HIT THE ROAD BARACK! Your time is over. "En mi opinion" Octubre 26, 2012

ENCUESTAS ELECCIONES OCTUBRE VIERNES 26, 2012

ENVIADAS POR JESÚS ANGUL0

Opinion, News, Analysis, Videos and Polls

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html

General Election: Romney vs. Obama

RCP Electoral Map | Changes in Electoral Count | Map With No Toss Ups | No Toss Up Changes

Polling Data

RCP Average	10/15 - 10/24	--	--	47.9	47.0	Romney +0.9
Rasmussen Reports	10/22 - 10/24	1500 LV	3.0	50	47	Romney +3
ABC News/Wash Post	10/21 - 10/24	1386 LV	3.0	50	47	Romney +3
IBD/TIPP	10/19 - 10/24	948 LV	3.5	45	47	Obama +2
Gallup	10/18 - 10/24	2700 LV	2.0	50	47	Romney +3
Associated Press/GfK	10/19 - 10/23	839 LV	4.2	47	45	Romney +2
Monmouth/SurveyUSA/Braun	10/18 - 10/21	1402 LV	2.6	48	45	Romney +3
NBC News/Wall St. Jrnl	10/17 - 10/20	816 LV	3.4	47	47	Tie
CBS News	10/17 - 10/20	790 LV	4.0	46	48	Obama +2
WashTimes/JZ Analytics*	10/18 - 10/20	800 LV	3.5	47	50	Obama +3
Politico/GWU/Battleground	10/15 - 10/18	1000 LV	3.1	49	47	Romney +2

All General Election: Romney vs. Obama Polling Data

201 Obama/Biden	Toss Ups 146	Romney/Ryan 191

Rasmussen Poll: Romney Leads Obama in Swing States

50-46
Read more on Newsmax.com: Rasmussen Poll: Romney Leads Obama in Swing States 50-46
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now! Mitt Romney is now attracting support from 50 percent of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47 percent — an indication that the GOP candidate is holding his lead and momentum after the final debate earlier this week.

More importantly, a new Rasmussen poll shows the Republican leading Obama in the crucial swing states that will determine the election, according to new data released Thursday.

The swing states collectively hold 146 Electoral College votes and include Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

In the 11 swing states, Mitt Romney earns 50 percent of the vote to Obama’s 46 percent. Two percent like another candidate in the race, and another two percent are undecided.

This is now the third day in a row - and the fifth time in the past six days - that Romney has hit the 50 percent mark in the combined swing states in a Rassmussen poll.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Rasmussen Poll: Romney Leads Obama in Swing States 50-46
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

 http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/rasmussen-swing-states-obama/2012/10/25/id/461496?s=al&promo_code=1080F-1#

“No more apologies we have to fight”

http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-libyan-fashion/

This is one of the most important denounce against Obama that I see, LRGM. Glen Beck Breaks down Obama’s ‘Lying’ On Libya In Fiery Segmentè http://www.westernjournalism.com/beck-breaks-down-obamas-lying-on-libya-in-fiery-segment/

“Obama’s Administration Lies”è http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=25449095&source=THEBLAZE

Lettereman on Obama’s lies [Late Night host David Letterman weighs in on Obama's repeated lies when it comes to Mitt Romney's record] è http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=25448997&source=THEBLAZE

Why this, (born in Socialist Hungary), US citizen will vote Republican this Election  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F4M4_8EUzoM

AUNQUE A LA MONA LA VISTAN DE SEDA “MONA SE QUEDA”

Colin Powell endorses Barack Obama for president for second timeè http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505263_162-57539893/colin-powell-endorses-barack-obama-for-president/

Esta es la expresión del mal agradecimiento elevada a su máxima expresión. Si no hubiera sido por el partido Republicano y George Bush este individuo no fuera mas que “Un negrito del batey” LRGM

 

 

Obama Linked To Benghazi Attackè http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-linked-to-benghazi-attack/

Frank Gaffney: Obama’s Middle East Fast & Furious?  http://www.westernjournalism.com/frank-gaffney-obamas-middle-east-fast-furious/

Miren lo que piensa este asqueroso animal inmundo, democrata, comunistoide y esposo de Janet Fonda: Ted Turner: I Think It’s “Good” U.S. Troops Are Killing Themselvesè http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-turner-i-think-its-good-u-s-troops-are-killing-themselves/

 

 

 

SOCIAL SECURITY NOW Hussein Obama CALLED FEDERAL BENEFIT PAYMENT/ENTITLEMENT!

Have you noticed, your Social Security check is now  referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment"?

I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.

Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.

The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment."

This isn't a benefit! It is earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.  We paid income tax on this money!

It totaled 15% of our income before taxes. If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security.

If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month including both your and your employer's
contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after
40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment.

Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive
$39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.

That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration (Google it - it's a fact).

Your retirement fund would normally last more than 33 years  (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! One can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere.
They "forgot" that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed.

Recently, they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer.

But is it our fault they misused our investments? And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a "benefit," as if we never worked to earn every penny of it. Just because they "borrowed" the money, it doesn't mean that our investments were a charity! Let's take a stand!  We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Let's demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government. Insist that they find a way to honor the IOU on the books of the Social Security and Medicare systems for the sake of that 92% of our population who currently or will need it.

Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.OUR EARNED RETIREMENT  INCOME


I paid into the system on every one of my paychecks until I was 72 years old. I am 80 years old now. I have been cheated out of my fair return already. I could have done a lot better with a saving account at a bank , but back then I trusted the Government, today I know the Government!..... For sure less hassle, less begging for my devalued  money back from the Federal Government and a terrible  sense of sadness  that is diverted to people that did not work for it, such a let down deal just when I  need it most.

If this is true we are in Sirius trouble. Martha Ruiz.

And to think that Fox News was the only channel that reported this. Brassy!

In my opinion, the Muslims are all getting very brave now. Read Tedd

Petruna's story below. Can you imagine, our own news media now are so

politically correct that they are afraid to report that these were all

Muslims? Unbelievable. Thank God for people like Tedd Petruna.

I, Gene Hackemack, received this email from my good friend Tedd

Petruna. He is, a diver  at the NBL (Neutral Buoyancy Lab) facility at

NASA Houston . I used to work with Tedd who happened to be on the

AirTran Flight 297, from Atlanta to Houston .

"One week ago, I went to Ohio on business and to see my  father. On

Tuesday, the 17th, I  returned home. If you read the papers the 18th

you may have seen a blurb about where an Air Tran flight was canceled

from Atlanta to Houston due to a man who refused to get off of his cell

phone before take- off. The story was only on Fox News. That was NOT

what really happened.

I was seated in 1st class coming home. Eleven Muslim men got on the

plane in full Muslim attire. Two of them sat in 1st class and the rest

seated themselves throughout the plane, in coach class, all the way to

the back.. As the plane taxied out to the runway, the stewardesses gave

the safety spiel that we are all so familiar with.

At that time, one of the men, in 1st class, got on his cell and called

one of his companions back in coach. He proceeded to talk on the phone

in Arabic very loudly and very, very aggressively. This activity took

the 1st stewardess out of action for she repeatedly told the man that

cell phones were not permitted at that time. He ignored her as if she

were not there. The man, who answered the phone back in the coach

section, did the same and this took out the 2nd stewardess. Further

back in the plane, at the same time, two younger Muslims, one in the

back on the aisle, and one sitting in front of him by the window, began

to show footage of a porno video they had taped the night before. They

were very loud about it.

Now, Muslim men are only permitted to view porno women prior to Jihad.

If a Muslim man goes into        a strip club, he has to view the woman via

mirror with his back to her. (Don't ask me, I don't make the rules,

but I've studied Muslims.)

The 3rd stewardess informed the two men that they were not to have

electronic devices on at this time.

One of the men said "shut up infidel dog!"

The stewardess attempted to take the camcorder and the Muslim began to

scream in her face in Arabic. At that exact moment, all eleven of the

men got up and started to walk throughout the cabin. I guess that

because of the noise, the flight crew must have decided that there was

something amiss and changed the plane's directions to head back to the

terminal.

The commotion and noise was reaching a feverish pitch, and at this

point I had had enough! I got up and started towards the back of 1st

class, when I heard a voice behind me, from another Texan twice my

size, say "I got your back." Then I grabbed the man, who had been on

the cell phone, by the arm and said "You WILL sit down in your seat or

you WILL be thrown from this plane!" As I "led" him around me to take

his seat, the fellow Texan grabbed him by the back of his neck and his

waist and headed him back to his seat. I then grabbed the 2nd man and

said, "You WILL do the same!"

He protested loudly, but my adrenaline was flowing now and he was going

to go also. Just as I escorted him forward, the plane stopped, the

doors opened and three TSA agents and four police officers entered the

cabin. Myself and my new  Texas friend were told to cease and desist

for they had the situation under control.

I was quite happy to oblige actually. There was still some sort of

commotion in the back, but within moments, all eleven Muslim men were

escorted off the plane. The TSA agents then had their luggage

unloaded. We talked about the occurrence and were in disbelief that it

had happened.

Then suddenly, the door opened again and in walked all eleven Muslim

men! Stone faced, eyes front and robotic, (the only way I can describe

it) they were reseated. The stewardess from the back had been in tears

and when she saw the men, she was having NONE of it! Since I was up

front, I heard and saw the whole ordeal. She told the TSA agents that

there was NO WAY she was staying on the plane with the Muslim men. The

agent told her that they had searched the men and were going through

their luggage with a fine tooth comb. However, nothing had been found

and that the men were allowed to proceed on to Houston .

The captain and co-captain came out of the cockpit and told the agent,

"We and our crew will not fly this plane!" After a word or two, the

entire crew, luggage in tow, left the plane. Five minutes later, the

cabin door opened again and a whole new crew walked on. Again, this

was where I had had enough! I got up and asked the TSA agent, "What

the hell is going on?

I was told to take my seat. The airlines and TSA were sorry for the

delay and we would be home shortly. I said "I'm getting off this

plane". The stewardess sternly told me that she could not allow me to

get off. Now I'm really mad! I said "I am a grown man who bought this

ticket, who's time is mine with a family at home and I am going through

that door, or I'm going through that door with you under my arm, but I

AM going through that door!"

And then I heard a voice behind me say "So am I!" Then everyone behind

us started to get up and say the same thing. Within two minutes, I was

walking off that plane where I was met by more TSA agents who asked me

to write a statement about the incident. I had five hours to kill at

this point waiting for the next flight to  Houston , so why the hell not

give them my statement.  Due to the amount of people who got off that

flight, it was canceled. I was supposed to be in Houston at 6 PM, but

I finally got there at 12:30 AM. If you don't believe this, look up

the date and then Flight 297 from Atlanta to  Houston .

If this wasn't a terrorism dry run, I don't know what one is. The

terrorists wanted to see how TSA would handle it, how the crew would

handle it, and how the passengers would handle it. I'm telling this to

you because I want you to  know. The threat IS real. I saw it with my

own eyes."

Tedd Petruna

I suggest you keep this going until this incident reaches the email of

all POLITICIANS and the news media!

Escándalo tapado:  la definición de empleo cambiada... Ricardo Samitier

Secretos En La Ley “Obama-Care”

Reducida La Semana Laboral

De 40 Horas A 30 Horas

Los Que Trabajan 30 Horas Son Full Time... No Part Time...

La medida es para forzar a las empresas a comprar seguro medico...

Esa medida va a TRAER COMO RESULTADO dos cosas:

1.     Las empresas para NO COMPRAR seguro medico VAN A REDUCIR EL NUMERO DE HORAS DE LOS PART TIME a menos de 30 horas... reduciendo el dinero en el hogar...

2.     Si no pueden REDUCEN EL NUMERO DE HORAS VAN A AUMENTAR LAS HORAS y USARAN MENOS EMPLEADOS...

3.     Muchas empresas Cerraran Desempleado mas personas...

He aquí la NOTICIA PUBLICADA AYER... en Ingles... ESCONDIDA EN EL OBAMA-CARE.

Anyone Who Works 30-Hour Week Is Now 'Full-Time' No Part Time

By Matt Cover

October 18, 2012

Subscribe to Matt Cover's posts

    

President Obama signs the Democrats’ health care bill into law in the East Room of the White House on Tuesday, March 23, 2010. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

CNSNews.com) – A little-known section in the Obamacare health reform law defines “full-time” work as averaging only 30 hours per week, a definition that will affect some employers who utilize part-time workers to trim the cost of complying with the Obamacare rule that says businesses with 50 or more workers must provide health insurance or pay a fine.

“The term ‘full-time employee’ means, with respect to any month, an employee who is employed on average at least 30 hours of service per week,” section 1513 of the lawreads.  (Scroll down to section 4, paragraph A.)

That section, known as the employer mandate, requires any business with 50 or more full-time employees to provide at least the minimum level of government-defined health coverage to those employees.

In other words, a business must provide insurance if it has 50 or more employees working an average of just 30 hours per week, which is 10 hours per week fewer than the traditional 40-hour work week.

If an employer has 50 or more "full-time employees" and does not offer health insurance, it must pay a penalty per employee for each month it does not offer coverage.

The obscure provision recently reemerged in regulations issued by the IRSfor how employers must account for which workers are full-time and which ones are not.

(AP Photo/Mark Duncan, File)

Under these standards, published in September, employers can choose a “look-back” period of between 3 and 12 months to measure if an employee has worked an average of 30 hours per week.

If an employee has worked 30 hours per week during this time, the person would count as a full-time employee for at least the next six months, regardless of how much they work, thus preventing employers from cutting hours to avoid the mandate.

In other words, an employer calculates the hours an employee works during at least a three-month period, determining if they employee has worked 30 hours or more per week on average.

If the employee meets the 30-hour threshold, they are counted as full-time for at least six months. If the employer has at least 50 such employees, he must provide them with health insurance pay a fine.

The IRS regulations do not apply to seasonal or temporary workers, only to regular employees.

y aumentan el numero de empleo para Obama!

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/mikeshedlock/2012/10/25/obama_slashes_four_hours_off_definition_of_fulltime_employment

Si esto es verdad el departamento de justicia, el partido Demócrata y El Partido Republicano deben denunciarlo. Investigarlo y castigar a los culpables.

Soros Backed 'Vote Fraud Denier Industry'

By Kevin Mooney on 3.8.12 @ 1:20PM

Going into the 2012 elections, the Republican Party appears to be a great disadvantage against a well-funded, well-organized "vote fraud denier industry" working overtime to keep ineligible names on ballots across the country. J. Christian Adams, a former attorney in the Voting Section of the U.S. Department of Justice, has identified several states with localities that have "implausible" registration numbers; meaning they have more names on the ballots than they have eligible voters.

Adams resigned from the DOJ after the department declined to pursue a voter intimidation case from the 2008 elections against members of the New Black Panther Party (NBPR) in Philadelphia. In his new book entitled: Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department, he describes how Obama's DOJ deliberately avoids enforcing Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), which calls for registration rolls to be purged of ineligible voters. At the same time, the DOJ is pushing "motor voter" lawsuits activated under Section 7 of the NVRA in an effort to uptick the Democratic turnout.

Thanks to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests Judicial Watch has filed, the collusion and cooperation between Obama's DOJ and third party pressure groups is now well documented.

Not surprisingly, ACORN's Project Vote figures prominently into the equation. But Anita MonCrief, a former Project Vote employee who has testified against the ACORN network in court, warns against fixating on Project Vote. The "vote fraud denier industry" as it is aptly described by Adams, includes several groups that deserve scrutiny. They are: The Brennan Center for Law and Justice, the Advancement Project, the NAACP, the ACLU, Demos, and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. The financial backers standing behind this industry, according to "Injustice," are the George Soros's Open Society Institute, the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation and Pew Charitable Trusts.

Bill Wilson, president of Americans for Limited Government, has commented, "The fact that Soros is spending large amounts of money to prevent voter fraud investigations is a bright red warning light that the sanctity of our election system is under unprecedented attack."

The question becomes is the Republican National Committee (RNC) doing anything to prepare for the onslaught of fraudulent votes?

It is worth recalling that Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who was behind Republican Norm Coleman before a recount went into effect in 2008, turned out to be the extra vote needed to pass ObamaCare. Minnesota Secretary of State Mark Ritchie, who oversaw that recount, was maneuvered into his position by the George Soros "Secretary of State Project" and with backing from ACORN.

http://spectator.org/blog/2012/03/08/republican-party-overmatched-b

THE   WASHINGTON POST HITS OBAMA by Sofia Iduate.

Finally, the Washington Post and Newsweek speak out about Obama. This is timely
and tough. As many of you know, the Washington Post and Newsweek have a reputation
for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editors saw fit to print
the following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event,
and a news story in and of itself. At last, the truth about our
President and his agenda are starting to trickle through the
“protective wall” built around him by the liberal media.

___________________________

I Too Have Become Disillusioned.

By Matt Patterson (columnist - Washington Post, New York Post, San
Francisco Examiner)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack
Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a
baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the
Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of
professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could
manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful
military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life:
ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades
and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community
organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative
achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did
he vote "present"); and finally an unaccomplished single term in the
United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his
presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature
legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his
troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher
who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life,
actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political
sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all
and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be
sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken
hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist
like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama
was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal Dom to have
hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if
they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass. Let that sink in: Obama
was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of
his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history
matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself
had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance
to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of
racism to rest?

Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the
Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of
course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all
affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily
to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about
themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat
themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools
for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the
inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow.
Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't
around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem
resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes,
racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the
color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if
that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never
troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many
have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia   despite
undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough
for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois ; he was told
he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the
Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was
good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the
contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display
every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked
executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory
skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives
included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and that's when
he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the prompter is absent
he can barely think or speak at all. Not one original idea has ever
issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that
has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and
everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I
inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the
task. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise
his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence. But
really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for
anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the
temperament nor the intellect to handle his job. When you understand
that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of
liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise
with such a man in the Oval Office.

Mounting Evidence Implicates Soros-Tied Dem Voter Registration Program in Mass Organized Fraud Effort
Jul 27, 2012 4 Comments Toro520

Pajamas Media:

Earlier today, news broke that the Romney campaign is requesting a state-level investigation of a voter registration group in Virginia. That group, the Voter Participation Center, has been sending out voter registration forms to people all over the commonwealth, hundreds of thousands of forms per month. The Washington Post and the Richmond Times-Dispatch have published stories on the Voter Participation Center and the allegations that the Romney campaign has levied against it. But both stories barely hint at what the VPC may be doing.

The center’s registration forms, some of which have been addressed to the dead, children, even pets and felons ineligible to vote in Virgina, state that recipients are eligible to vote. They come with some personal information already filled in, and instruct recipients to send the forms in to the Virginia State Board of Elections via Business Reply Mail to an address pre-printed on the form. But where do the returned forms really go? A Virginia blogger at the Disrupt the Narrative blog received one of the VPC’s forms in the mail in June 2012, and posted screen shots of the form on the blog. Click the image to enlarge it.

Look at the screenshot of the form above. The address for the State Board of Elections is correct up to the zip code. But the zip code on the form will send it somewhere other than the actual State Board of Elections.

The group bills itself as a Washington-based voter registration group, and on the voter registration form gives its return address as 7109 Staples Mill Rd., #160, Richmond, VA 22238.

Where is that? It certainly is not an office. Click the photos to enlarge them and see.

The evident misdirection of the return address and the permit number registered in Pennsylvania all beg for an answer: Why? These returned registration forms contain real personal information including full legal names, date of birth, and even Social Security numbers. What is the Voter Participation Center really up to, in having forms returned to an address that it says is controlled by a state entity, when that is not the truth? Additionally, where are the completed forms really going?

The Disrupt the Narrative blogger inquired about the zip code discrepancy with the US Postal Inspector, and received the following reply.

The Business Reply Mail (BRM) piece, Permit # 78103, containing the zip code 23286 is a unique zip code for BRM in the city of Richmond. The plus 4 number (0508) identifies the station in the city that the mail goes to.

BRM Permit # 78103 is issued out of Denver, CO and is issued to the Voters Participation Center. VPC has many sub accounts who use this number in different states, such as Virginia.

The bogus zip code is not a mistake or misprint. Google mapping 23286-0508 leads to a Richmond, VA park, and a query to the post office nearby at 1801 Brook Rd. in Richmond confirmed that the return address resides within that post office. The Voter Participation Center appears to be spoofing the Virginia State Board of Elections. The Voter Participation Center appears to be receiving forms that respondents believe are going to the Virginia State Board of Elections, but are not. Why? How many states is the VPC operating in?

As I noted in the previous post, the Voter Participation Center is not a non-partisan entity. It is run by longtime Democratic Party operative Page S. Gardner and receives funding from the Tides Center, which is funded by Democratic Party heavyweights including Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Sen. John Kerry (D-MA). The VPC’s Democratic connections do not stop there. John Podesta, former President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff and current chair and counselor to the Democratic advocacy group Center for American Progress, is on the Voter Participation Center’s board. The CAP is among the many groups on the political left that receive significant funding from George Soros, the billionaire who was convicted of insider trading by a French court in 2002.

The Voter Participation Center’s questionable activities are not limited to Virginia. On June 21, 2012, the Tampa Bay Times published a lengthy report on the group’s activities in Florida. The group’s tactics in Florida are similar to those it is deploying in Virginia, complete with confusing forms containing personal information. The forms went out to 420,000 Floridians, many of whom are already registered to vote and were confused to receive official-looking voter registration forms from the VPC. The VPC has also been active in Colorado this year. According to a Wisconsin blogger, the VPC has turned up mailing out forms in Wisconsin as well and spoofing the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board in a correct address/wrong zip code pairing similar to the method used in Virginia. VPC in Wisconsin also uses a return address that leads to a UPS box, again similar to the operation in Virginia.

Virginia, Florida, Colorado, Wisconsin — all of these states are expected to be in play in the presidential election in November, and most polling shows a tightening race in all of them. A small number of votes here and there could make a very significant difference.

To date, no one has done a comprehensive review of the Voter Participation Center’s activities in other states. If you have received a form from the Voter Participation Center, please email me at bryanp — at — pjmedia — dot — com.

Update: The VPC has posted a list of the states it was operating registration drives in in the last quarter of 2011. They are:

Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington.

They left Wisconsin off the list, most likely because they did not anticipate the recall and that Gov. Walker’s victory would help turn WI into a swing state. If you live in any of these states, you may receive a VPC registration form.

Update: The VPC held a conference call to respond to the Romney campaign’s request for an investigation. I was on the call, and here is my report.

HIT THE ROAD BARACK! Your time is over.

http://patdollard.com/2012/07/mounting-evidence-implicates-soros-tied-dem-voter-registration-program-in-mass-organized-fraud-effort/

ENVIEN  “EN MI OPINION”  A SUS CONTACTOS

Lázaro R González Miño

305 445 7364 lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com   MrLazaroRGonzalez.blogspot.com

https://www.facebook.com/lazarorg, "Lazaro R Gonzalez" "MiamidaderecallLazarorgonzalezmino"

“Salmo109” 7-Cuando fuere juzgado salga culpable; 8-Sean sus días pocos; tome otro su oficio,

Porque tuyo es El Reino, El Poder y La Gloria Eterna. AMEN

“ WE OWN THIS COUNTRY, DON’T DARE TEST US” 

If we ever forget that we are one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under. Ronald Reagan

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL!

Lázaro R González Miño