EE.UU. cree que el atentado en Libia fue un asalto terrorista deliberado by CNN en Español
WASHINGTON (CNN) — El equipo de inteligencia de Estados Unidos
ha revisado el balance del atentado perpetrado contra el consulado
estadounidense en Libia e informó que fue un asalto terrorista deliberado. La
Oficina del Director de Inteligencia Nacional emitió un inusual comunicado este
viernes
Como llegamos a
estas condiciones... por Pedro G de Céspedes. Enviado por Ricardo
Samitier.
La infiltración COMUNISTA en los periódicos y
revistas, TV, enseñanza primaria, secundaria y universitaria, sindicatos,
burocracia, administración de fundaciones, y hasta en la asociación de
bibliotecarios, es impresionante. El PD ha dado aliento a grupos nocivos como
el activismo homosexual, los promotores de la legalización de la mariguana, los
defensores de la inmigración ilegal. Y vemos el resultado de esa sorda campaña
de cinco décadas en el reblandecimiento de la disciplina y unión familiar, el
auge de las madres solteras acogidas al welfare, la vulgaridad en los
espectáculos, graduados de high-school incapaces de explicar lo que leen. Una
sostenida campaña del PD para rebajar la moral de la sociedad entera,
culminando con un sujeto en la Casa Blanca que con descaro hace “stimulus”,
negocios sucios con sus amigotes a costa del tesoro nacional. En cuanto a los
musulmanes, recordemos que hace mucho tiempo un negro americano inició “Nation
of Islam”, un contingente de hombres de su raza convertidos al Islam que
cambiaron sus nombres imitando su ejemplo: Elijah Muhammad (antes Robert Poole,
1897-1975), mentor de tipejos como Louis Farrakhan (antes Wolcott, n. 1933,
virulento crítico de Israel), parte de un movimiento más amplio “black power”
que engendró grupos y actos violentos como los Black Panthers y los incendios y
motines de los 60s en varias ciudades con el pretexto no siempre válido de
“brutalidad policíaca”. Sin olvidar a pacíficos “reverendos” del PD como Jesse
Jackson, admirador y asiduo visitante de Fidel Castro.
· LA REVOLUCION EN EUROPA... comenzando por ESPANA. Ricardo Samitier.
· Los EE.UU. crearon la crisis económica en el año 1971 cuando se canceló el PATRON ORO “Gold Standard de intercambio aprobado después de la guerra en Bretton Woods.”
Desde
entonces, todos hemos estado en el dinero fiduciario. Cualquier otro país que
acepta Dólares significa que todos los demás también se encuentra en el dinero
fiduciario.
La
Reserva Federal ha invertido $ 16 billones en los bancos y todavía no hay
recuperación. Porque hay demasiada deuda. Tenemos la deuda pública, la deuda
comercial y deuda personal.
En
conjunto, se trata de un agujero negro de la deuda absorbiendo el dinero y
causando la deflación. Antes, TENÍAMOS UNA ECONOMÍA PRODUCTIVA, entonces
pasamos a UNA ECONOMÍA DE SERVICIOS, ahora VIVIMOS
EN UNA ECONOMÍA DE CRÉDITO.
Pero
tarde o temprano, el crédito tiene que ser devuelto o cancelado. AL IGUAL QUE ARGENTINA! Si nos limitamos a
comparar sólo Alemania y España, todo se aclara.
Alemania
exporta más a España, que las importaciones alemanas de España. Por lo tanto, el dinero fluye hacia Alemania. Normalmente, esto
causaría que la inflación de precios en Alemania. Más dinero en circulación,
que compiten por la misma cantidad de bienes y servicios que produce la
inflación dentro de Alemania. PERO ALEMANIA, HA
REINVERTIDO EL DINERO EN LOS BANCOS ESPAÑOLES.
¿Ese
dinero prestado a España, creó una burbuja crediticia. El pueblo español no
puede pagar a los bancos, con el sueldo de un camarero y una camarera de hotel.
Por
ejemplo: Mallorca solo tiene 65.000 trabajadores del hotel que ganan salario
mínimo. Los bancos están ahora en bancarrota y ni siquiera pueden pagar los
intereses de Alemania. Alemania tiene sólo dos opciones.
Acepta
menos y sigue dando crédito a España o cancelar la deuda y empieza de nuevo. Si
continúa para mantener a España a flote, entonces Alemania va a perder dinero,
ya que es la exportación de alto valor, los bienes duraderos y el pago de altos
salarios, a cambio de papel españolas, pagando intereses bajos.
El papel
es infinito, pero los productos de exportación no lo son! Por lo tanto,
Alemania pierde!
Si
cancela la deuda española. A continuación, Italia, Francia y los demás exigirá
lo mismo! Alemania pierde de nuevo!
Si España
tuviera la Peseta, esto no podría suceder! Debido a que la peseta se devaluaría
y el Marco aumentaría. Pero debido a que España y Alemania tienen la misma
moneda, no hay ningún mecanismo para controlar el desequilibrio.
Eventualmente,
toda la moneda de España estaría circulando en Alemania y los precios en España
se disparan, ya que menos dinero en circulación, para la misma cantidad de
bienes y servicios en España.
Esto es
exactamente lo que está pasando en España! Todo el
dinero está desapareciendo de la economía española! HAY UNA GRAN FUGA DE
CAPITALES...Por lo tanto, los españoles se ven obligados a imprimir
más dinero!
Es la única
solución para España. El papel es barato! El trabajo es duro! La vida es dura!
Por lo tanto, Alemania recibe como PAGO nuevos Euros
impresos en España ... y estos hacen una inflación de precios en
Alemania.
Alemania
pierde de nuevo! No importa como lo mires, Alemania pierde!
Así que, ¿cuánto tiempo puede continuar Alemania a
perdiendo??? Alemania es un país rico, pero no va a durar. Si
Alemania abandona el euro, el marco se elevará en valor. Haciendo que las
exportaciones alemanas sean caras y provocando una recesión en Alemania. Una
vez más Alemania pierde! Si Alemania se queda en el euro y cada país paga
Alemania de nuevo con el papel, Alemania pierde de nuevo!
Si España
deja el Euro, todos los bienes importados se disparan en el precio! España no sólo es un importador neto de bienes, es un
importador NETO DE ALIMENTOS TAMBIÉN!
España no puede alimentarse a sí mismo y
debe pagar por esas importaciones de alimentos con Euros! DISTURBIOS POR ALIMENTOS, SERÍA EL
RESULTADO.
La única
solución es negociar duro activos españoles, para los bienes duraderos y los
alimentos, que se llama trueque y difícil de igualar. Es por eso que el ORO y la PLATA, se
utilizaban desde la época antes de ROMA...no dólares de papel... para el
comercio.
El oro y
la plata son los dos únicos elementos que tienen la capacidad de cancelar las
deudas de todo el mundo!
Sin
embargo, España sólo cuenta con 240 toneladas de
oro. Alemania dispone de 4000 toneladas.
Al precio actual del oro, España no puede importar
combustible, ni comida.
ESPAÑA ES POBRE, SIEMPRE LO FUE... pero los POLITICOS le han hecho creer a la GENERACIÓN JOVEN
que es un país rico. En
algún momento, la sorpresa de ser pobre, será demasiado para la población
española.
Los
viejos, todavía recuerdo que eran pobres y no tienen mucho tiempo de vida,
aceptarán la pobreza y comer frijoles.
Pero la
clase obrera española piensa que España es rica...!
Durante los últimos 30 años, los españoles
han dicho que son europeos.
Los
jóvenes no tienen idea de España es pobre! La realidad pronto golpeará España,
el bien y duro!
Desafortunadamente, esa es la forma...
en que TODAS LAS REVOLUCIÓNES HAN
COMENZADO...
36 dias
para sacarlo de la Casa Blanca .
¿Que está
pasando en Roma??? Ricardo
Samitier.
YO deje de practicar el CATOLISISMO...
CUANDO LOS CURAS se pusieron a FAVOR DE HACER LA PAZ EN VIET NAM... traicionando a los CATOLICOS de Viet Nam del SUR... si EL
SUR ERA CATOLICO... los asesinados HERMANOS BIEN por
KENNEDY... eran católicos... pero los curas estaban
obligados a pedir por la PAZ EN TODAS LAS MISAS... y de paso...
SIN DECIRLO... abandonaron a CUBA...
¿Miren lo que está pasando
en Roma... AHORA???
Desde 1735 hasta 1959...
todos los Papas han condenado los masones.
Hace poco, muere el
Cardenal Martini y la logia masónica, la Grande De Oriente de Italia,
lo honra ahora con una
ceremonia recordatoria.
¿Por que honran los
masones, a un Cardenal, si son enemigos?
Llamando a Martini:
hombre del dialogo y una gran expresión de la voz de la
Iglesia.
Seria Martini un MASON
INFILTRADO en la GERARQUIA DE ROMA?
Vean seguido, una misa
"católica" en España:
Parece un RITUAL PROPIO DE
SODOMA y GOMORRA...
El "arzobispo"
Mueller,
nombrado
al puesto "Defensor de la Fe" por el Papa, escribió esto:
No creo en la VIRGINIDAD
DE LA VIRGEN... NI EN LOS MILAGROS DE CRISTO... NI EN LA EUCARISTIA...
El "Papa"
Benedicto XVI nombrar un judío, Caballero Papal sin convertirse:
La iglesia "Católica"
en Alemania, cambia los sacramentos por impuestos.
No hay mas bautizos,
bodas y entierros, sin pagar!:
Eso fue lo hizo que
Lutero protestara y dio origen al PROTESTANTISMO...
¿Tenemos Papa, Si o No?
¡La respuesta es clara!
¡Benedicto es incapaz de
mantener la fe católica,
Porque, El Mismo, No La
Tiene!
Están destruyendo la
iglesia católica... y cuando este DESTRUIDA... LA DICTADURA MUSULMANA SE
IMPONDRA... mujeres ya tendrán que TAPARSE HASTA LOS OJOS...
Otro “SILENCIO” DE LA PRENSA... Ya nadie habla de esto:
Quien estableció ESCUCHAR los teléfonos y leer los
correos electrónicos... SIN ORDEN
JUDICIAL, fue la administración Bush, después de 9 / 11...
FUE UNA DE LAS CAUSAS MÁS DENUNCIADA DE LA IZQUIERDA y la
PRENSA contra Bush....
Pero desde que Obama llegó al poder - - el silencio
ha prevalecido EN LA PRENSA y en todas las asociaciones
izquierdistas... En otras palabras... los
socialistas... PUEDEN ESPIARNOS.
El gobierno de Obama ha aumentado el ESPIONAJE a extremos
que ha ASUSTADO a los
comunistas... Ricardo Samitier.
Lean este último informe
de la AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTY UNION... La organización que defiende a todos los
izquierdistas y los que rompen la ley...
28 de septiembre 2012
La ACLU publicó un
informe esta semana que muestra que bajo EL GOBIERNO DE Obama y su fiscal
general Eric Holder, las escuchas SIN ORDEN JUDICIAL y la vigilancia de las comunicaciones electrónicas
estadounidenses es "marcadamente en aumento."
Después de meses
de litigio y la Libertad de solicitudes de la Ley de Información, la ACLU
obtuvo documentos del gobierno federal que demuestra que en tiempo real de las
comunicaciones electrónicas dentro de los EE.UU. ha aumentado 60 por ciento desde 2009 y
supera con creces el seguimiento durante la presidencia de Bush.
Los informes de la
ACLU que el Departamento de Justicia usados "pen register" (registro de pluma) y
"trampa" (técnicas de rastreo)
Que es un "registro
de la pluma", el capta los datos salientes de una cuenta de teléfono o correo
electrónico, mientras que "la trampa y rastro" captura los datos entrantes.
Durante ese mismo
período, el número de personas cuyos teléfonos fueron objeto de registro de la
pluma y trampa y rastreo de vigilancia se han más que triplicado. De hecho, más
personas se sometieron a registro de la pluma y la vigilancia trampa y rastro
en los últimos dos años que en toda la década anterior.
"El número de
autorizaciones del Departamento de Justicia recibió a utilizar estos
dispositivos en el correo electrónico y de los datos de la red aumentó un 361%
entre 2009 y 2011", dijo la ACLU.
Cabe señalar que
todo esto es perpetrado por el Departamento de Justicia, sin obtener órdenes tradicionales.
La ACLU se quejó
de que se ha bloqueado repetidamente por la administración Obama en la búsqueda
de la divulgación. La ACLU también señaló que desde que Obama llegó a la
presidencia su gobierno ha descuidado reiteradamente los plazos exigidos por la
ley para emitir informes sobre las acciones del Departamento de Justicia.
El grupo de
derechos civiles encarga al gobierno federal de "frustrante supervisión
democrática" y evitar una medida básica de la rendición de cuentas por
descuidar sus deberes para cumplir con estas medidas de transparencia.
CUALQUIERA PUEDE CAER EN ESA
LISTA...
¿ESTAREMOS NOSOTROS EN LA
LISTA?
La informacion en INGLES…
El Islam se está convirtiendo
en la religión oficial de la PRENSA de América. Ricardo Samitier.
Ahora bien, también es
sorprendente que los Estados Unidos están transmitiendos anuncios de televisión
en todo Pakistán pidiendo disculpas por un video en Internet
despectivo para una película inexistente degradante del ser que los musulmanes
llaman "El profeta Mahoma". Nadie en su sano juicio esta de
acuerdo que se inclinen en el mismo país que albergaba a Osama bin Laden a un
grupo que disfrutaba, se deleitaba en el terrorismo contra civiles
estadounidenses y todavía proporciona el marco para la red terrorista Haqqani, puede
ser humillante y un insulto a la memoria de los grandes americanos que fueron
asesinados la semana pasada en Libia.
No, simplemente lo tomo con
calma que nuestro Presidente y nuestro Secretario de Estado disculpen a las
personas que nos odian y nos quieren muertos. Eso no es lo que me estoy
refiriendo.
Me refiero a algo peor: ¿Ha
notado que en los últimos años, y especialmente en las últimas semanas desde el
asesinato del embajador y sus guardias y colega en Benghazi (una ciudad que
amaba Erwin Rommel y cuyos habitantes alabó) , siempre que el New York Times se
refiere a Mahoma, ellos siempre lo llaman, sin comillas, el PROFETA MAHOMA, como
si todos los que tienen algún sentido entiende que, por supuesto Mahoma es el
único profeta verdadero y que acaba de entenderse que Mahoma es el Profeta.
Yo veo esto en otros medios de
comunicación y en la televisión, también. Sober aspecto periodistas y newswomen
menciona a Mahoma como el profeta Mahoma. Ningún ifs, ands o peros. Lo oigo en
el Servicio Mundial de la BBC, también.
Ahora bien, si los musulmanes
quieren creer que Mahoma es el Profeta, que Dios los bendiga. Fino y elegante.
Si alguien quiere creer que, buena suerte para él o ella. Pero ¿por qué
nuestros medios de comunicación aquí en los EE.UU., un país mayoritariamente
cristiano, consulte profeta del Islam como "El Profeta"?
¿Alguna vez ha visto ningún
periódico importante aquí en los EE.UU. se refieren a Jesús como "el Hijo de
Dios, Dios encarnado, el Señor Jesucristo"?
¿Puede usted imaginarse el New York Times en ejecución una historia sobre un
crucifijo descansando en la orina en una "galería de arte" como una
ofensa contra "El Señor Jesús, Hijo de Dios"?
¿Puede usted imaginar cualquier periódico importante en este país que tenga una
historia sobre el Papa y refiriéndose a él como "El
Santo Padre, el puente entre el Cielo y la Tierra"? O acerca de María,
como "Santa María, Madre de Dios"? Nunca
iba a suceder.
Pero de alguna manera,
probablemente debido a que las personas que escriben los artículos y editarlos
o los productores en los programas de noticias de televisión temen ser
decapitado - ¿y quién no lo hace? - Hemos adoptado en nuestro medio la
afirmación musulmán que Mahoma es el Profeta al
tiempo que otras figuras religiosas de la palma de nuestra mano los medios de
comunicación.
Esto es aterrador. No se
supone que deben estar haciendo una reverencia a un grupo religioso que tiene
muchos seguidores que nos quiere muertos. No somos, como periodistas, se supone
que etiquetar a alguien como "El" Profeta. Pero de alguna manera, lo
que está pasando. La PRENSA se ha convertido en una voz para el Islam.
Hitler lo veía hace mucho
tiempo. El terror y el miedo a la violencia puede producir cambios
sorprendentes en el comportamiento de las personas. Lo mismo ocurre con una
corrección errónea política y odio a sí mismo para la nación más grande en la
tierra.
Escuché una conversación entre
dos mujeres en una mesa de comedor que fue ayer. Uno de ellos dijo: "No me
importa lo que digan los demás, Obama es un musulmán" (ella lo ha dicho
antes) y el otro dijo: "Él no es un musulmán. Él es estúpido."
Yo no he dicho nada a ellos.
Sólo estoy diciendo, estos no se sienten como días normales. Se sienten como
los últimos días.
Sólo hay una sensación en el
aire, una mirada en el cielo al atardecer, con una expresión en los rostros de
las personas. El miedo está en todas partes. Obama no puede perder esta
elección a menos que suficientes personas creen que es a su alcance para
detener el tic-tac del reloj, y yo no siento que marejada. No, en absoluto. Cuando los
medios estadounidenses da la espalda a nuestra propia religión de tolerancia y
adora a una religión de intolerancia, los tiempos son al revés. La PRENSA dice
que todo está bien, confía en El Príncipe de Grant Park, Chicago. Pero siempre
he preferido la amonestación: "No confiéis en los príncipes." Algo ha pasado.
Don't
look now, but Islam is becoming the MSM's official religion of America.
36 dias para sacarlo de la Casa Blanca .
WHEN I FINISHED READING
THIS I GOT SHORT OF BREATH…. Robert Lam.
Looking back thru the
past 4 years, many "Whens" pop up. Read them all to better
understand where we are going as a country….
WHEN - he refused to disclose who donated money to his election campaign, as other candidates had done, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he received endorsements from people like Louis Farrakhan, Muramar Kaddafi and Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - it was pointed out that he was a total newcomer and had absolutely no experience at anything except community organizing, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he chose friends and acquaintances such as Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn who were revolutionary radicals, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - his voting record in the Illinois Senate and in the U.S. Senate came into question, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he refused to wear a flag lapel pin and did so only after a public outcry, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - people started treating him as a Messiah and children in schools were taught to sing his praises, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he stood with his hands over his groin area for the playing of the National Anthem and Pledge of Allegiance, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he surrounded himself in the White House with advisors who were pro-gun control, pro-abortion, pro-homosexual marriage and wanting to curtail freedom of speech to silence the opposition, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he said he favors sex education in kindergarten, including homosexual indoctrination, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - his personal background was either scrubbed or hidden and nothing could be found about him, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - the place of his birth was called into question, and he refused to produce a birth certificate, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he had an association in Chicago with Tony Rezco - a man of questionable character and who is now in prison and had helped Obama to a sweet deal on the purchase of his home - people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - it became known that George Soros, a multi-billionaire Marxist, spent a ton of money to get him elected, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he started appointing White House Czars that were radicals, revolutionaries, and even avowed Marxist /Communists, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he stood before the Nation and told us that his intentions were to "fundamentally transform this Nation" into something else, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - it became known that he had trained ACORN workers in Chicago and served as an attorney for ACORN, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed cabinet members and several advisers who were tax cheats and socialists, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed a Science Czar, John Holdren, who believes in forced abortions, mass sterilizations and seizing babies from teen mothers, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed Cass Sunstein as Regulatory Czar who believes in "Explicit Consent," harvesting human organs without family consent and allowing animals to be represented in court, while banning all hunting, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed Kevin Jennings, a homosexual and organizer of a group called Gay, Lesbian, Straight, Education Network as Safe School Czar and it became known that he had a history of bad advice to teenagers, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed Mark Lloyd as Diversity Czar who believes in curtailing free speech, taking from one and giving to another to spread the wealth, who supports Hugo Chavez, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - Valerie Jarrett, an avowed Socialist, was selected as Obama's Senior White House Advisor, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director, said Mao Tse Tung was her favorite philosopher and the person she turned to most for inspiration, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed Carol Browner, a well known socialist as Global Warming Czar working on Cap and Trade as the nation's largest tax, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he appointed Van Jones, an ex-con and avowed Communist as Green Energy Czar, who since had to resign when this was made known, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - Tom Daschle, Obama's pick for Health and Human Services Secretary could not be confirmed because he was a tax cheat, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - as President of the United States, he bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he traveled around the world criticizing America and never once talking of her greatness, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - his actions concerning the Middle East seemed to support the Palestinians over Israel, our long time ally, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he took American tax dollars to resettle thousands of Palestinians from Gaza to the United States, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he upset the Europeans by removing plans for a missile defense system against the Russians, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he played politics in Afghanistan by not sending troops early-on when the Field Commanders said they were necessary to win, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he started spending us into a debt that was so big we could not pay it off, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he took a huge spending bill under the guise of stimulus and used it to pay off organizations, unions, and individuals that got him elected, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he took over insurance companies, car companies, banks, etc., people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he took away student loans from the banks and put it through the government, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he designed plans to take over the health care system and put it under government control, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he claimed he was a Christian during the election and tapes were later made public that showed Obama speaking to a Muslim group and 'stating' that he was raised a Muslim, was educated as a Muslim, and is still a Muslim, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he set into motion a plan to take over the control of all energy in the United States through Cap and Trade, people said it didn't matter.
WHEN - he finally completed his transformation of America into a Socialist State, people woke up--- but it was too late. Add these up one by one and you get a phenomenal score that points to the fact that Barrack Hussein Obama is determined to turn America into a Marxist-Socialist society. All of the items in the preceding paragraphs have been put into place. All can be documented very easily. Before you disavow this do an Internet search. The last paragraph alone is not yet cast in stone. You and I will write that paragraph.
Will it read as above or
will it be a happier ending for most of America?
Don't just belittle the opposition. Search for the truth. We all need to pull together or watch the demise of a free democratic society. Pray for Americans to seek the truth and take action for it will keep us FREE. Our biggest enemy is not China, Russia, North Korea or Iran. Our biggest enemy is a contingent of politicians in Washington, DC . The government will not help, so we need to do it ourselves.
Question....will you delete this, or pass it on to others who don't know about Obama's actions and plans for the USA , so that they may know how to vote in November, 2012 and the ensuing years?
It's your decision. I believe it does matter!
· "Focal Point": A huge Muslim problem: inbreeding Written by Bryan Fischer
Jorge
A Villalón
When I started
talking about this problem in Saudi Arabia people would tell me that I was just
against Muslims. I damned sure am but I also know the book of the Islamic
world, which ain’t pretty. People here in the States are fearful of
talking about the problems of the Islam world. I’m not and won’t be, for
as I’ve said many times I fear for me children and the rest of my descendants.
You have heard of Saudi men coming over here, marrying an American woman, have two or three children and suddenly he moves back to Saudi Arabia. The woman has a choice, follow him and live like a Muslim woman or stay here in the US and hope her children will return some day.
You have heard of Saudi men coming over here, marrying an American woman, have two or three children and suddenly he moves back to Saudi Arabia. The woman has a choice, follow him and live like a Muslim woman or stay here in the US and hope her children will return some day.
The reason for
the wealthy Saudi getting the kids was because the Crown’s descendants’ genes
were becoming mixed and they were getting defective kids. This has
happened over the year but Americans think, well many do not think, that anyone
could be doing this. Yeah and there were no gas chambers in German prison
camps. Hang tuff and study about Islam,
Muslim inbreeding ... An interesting study. (and not often discussed)
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited (for the most part), in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other Muslim countries 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as retarded, increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time). In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world. He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.
Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the Peace Prize. According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
In Denmark, Sennels' native country, Muslim children are grossly over-represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Muslim inbreeding ... An interesting study. (and not often discussed)
Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist who has done extensive research into a little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins.
This practice, which has been prohibited (for the most part), in the Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world.
This practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority on all matters, including marriage.
The massive inbreeding in Muslim culture may well have done virtually irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health.
According to Sennels, close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred. In Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England, more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their first cousins, and in Denmark the number of inbred Pakistani immigrants is around 40%.
The numbers are equally devastating in other Muslim countries 67% in Saudi Arabia, 64% in Jordan and Kuwait, 63% in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British Pakistani family is more than 13 times as likely to have children with recessive genetic disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of children with genetic birth defects.
The risk of what are called autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher. Other negative consequences of inbreeding include a 100 percent increase in the risk of stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor.
Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating consequence of Muslim marriage patterns. According to Sennels, research shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their IQ and that social abilities develop much slower in inbred babies.
The risk of having an IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for being classified as retarded, increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages.
(Similar effects were seen in the Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of time). In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are more than 300 percent more likely to fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army.
Sennels says that the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world. He points out that the Arab world translates just 330 books every year, about 20% of what Greece alone does.
In the last 1,200 years of Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even read a book.
Sennels points out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely makes it harder for many Muslims to have success in our high-tech knowledge societies.
Only nine Muslims have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the Peace Prize. According to Nature magazine, Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of the world average when it comes to scientific research (measured by articles per million inhabitants).
In Denmark, Sennels' native country, Muslim children are grossly over-represented among children with special needs. One-third of the budget for Danish schools is consumed by special education, and anywhere from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background.
Learning ability is severely affected as well. Studies indicated that 64% of school children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of the native-born.
Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood
relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic illness. The increased risk of
insanity may explain why more than 40% of the patients in Denmark's biggest
ward for clinically insane criminals have an immigrant background.
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, one study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.
Sennels concludes There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Jewish and Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion.
These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Let’s hope America wakes up before a blind naïveté about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.
Bryan Fischer, "Focal Point": A huge Muslim problem: inbreeding Written by Bryan Fischer
The U.S. is not immune. According to Sennels, one study based on 300,000 Americans shows that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole.
Sennels concludes There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims' religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material to their population, the genetic damage done to their gene pool since their prophet allowed first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct and indirect human and societal consequences.
Bottom line Islam is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are Muslims. Simple Jewish and Christian compassion for Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and dangerous religion.
These stark realities must be taken into account when we establish public polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S.
Let’s hope America wakes up before a blind naïveté about the reality of Islam destroys what remains of our Judeo-Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.
Bryan Fischer, "Focal Point": A huge Muslim problem: inbreeding Written by Bryan Fischer
Peter King Calls for Susan Rice's Resignation
Saturday,
29 Sep 2012 09:17 AM
Rep. Peter
King, the New York Republican who chairs the House Homeland Security Committee,
has demanded the resignation of U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan
Rice in the wake of the Benghazi attack.
King said on CNN Friday that Rice's explanation on the talk shows was "such a failure of foreign policy message and leadership" and "such a misstatement of facts" that "I believe she should resign."
GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney also accused the administration of being dishonest.
Urgent Poll: Romney or Obama to Handle Foreign Crisis? Vote Here!
"I think it's pretty clear that they haven't wanted to level with the American people. We expect candor from the president and transparency," Romney told Fox News this week. Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence officials sought to explain Friday why the Obama administration's understanding of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is "evolving."
Facing a barrage of Republican criticism about what the administration knew and when about the attack, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement Friday that laid out how officials came to understand the assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. At the same time, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations issued a statement explaining her early descriptions of the attack.
In the days immediately after the attack, the administration said it believed it was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video that ridiculed Islam's Prophet Muhammad and ignited mob protests on U.S. embassies around the Middle East and in North Africa. Now, the administration has begun to call it a terrorist attack carried out by al-Qaida-linked militants and explain that it was a planned attack distinct from the mob protests in the region.
Republicans have seized on the Obama administration's changing narrative, saying the administration was too slow to label it a terrorist attack because, they said, the White House did not want to admit its policies had failed to defeat al-Qaida, and quell anti-American sentiment in the Muslim world.
"Throughout our investigation we continued to emphasize that information gathered was preliminary and evolving," DNI spokesman Shawn Turner's statement said.
"It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate. However, we do assess that some of those involved were linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to al-Qaida," he said.
At the same time, a spokeswoman for Rice also sought to explain comments that Rice made early in the investigation saying there was no evidence the Benghazi attack was premeditated.
"During her appearances on the Sunday talk shows Sept. 16, 2012, Ambassador Rice's comments were prefaced at every turn with a clear statement that an FBI investigation was under way that would provide the definitive accounting of the events that took place in Benghazi," said Erin Pelton, spokeswoman for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. "At every turn Ambassador Rice provided — and said she was providing — the best information and the best assessment that the administration had at the time, based on what was provided to Ambassador Rice and other senior U.S. officials by the U.S. intelligence community."
Further intelligence may be slow to arrive. The FBI team that arrived in Libya last week to investigate the incident can't get to the scene of the attack because it is too dangerous, according to two law enforcement officials. The officials requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing investigation.
Republicans have seen the Libya attack as an opportunity to attack President Barack Obama on one of his strengths, foreign policy.
Recent intelligence reports indicated a force of more than 50 heavily armed extremists attacked the consulate, using gun trucks for added firepower, and establishing a perimeter to limit access to the compound and catch any Americans who might try to escape. A first wave of attacks set fire to the main building, forcing the Americans to flee to a fallback building a half mile away, where a second group of extremists attacked with mortar fire. Stevens died of apparent smoke inhalation when he was caught inside the main consulate building, becoming separated from the other fleeing diplomats.
Urgent Poll: Romney or Obama to Handle Foreign Crisis? Vote Here!
Intelligence officials have focused their attention on Ansar al-Shariah, a Libyan militant group led by a former detainee at the U.S. military-run prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday that there has been a "thread of intelligence reporting" about groups in eastern Libya trying to coalesce but no specific threat to the consulate.
King said on CNN Friday that Rice's explanation on the talk shows was "such a failure of foreign policy message and leadership" and "such a misstatement of facts" that "I believe she should resign."
GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney also accused the administration of being dishonest.
Urgent Poll: Romney or Obama to Handle Foreign Crisis? Vote Here!
"I think it's pretty clear that they haven't wanted to level with the American people. We expect candor from the president and transparency," Romney told Fox News this week. Meanwhile, U.S. intelligence officials sought to explain Friday why the Obama administration's understanding of the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is "evolving."
Facing a barrage of Republican criticism about what the administration knew and when about the attack, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence issued a statement Friday that laid out how officials came to understand the assault that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans. At the same time, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations issued a statement explaining her early descriptions of the attack.
In the days immediately after the attack, the administration said it believed it was a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Islamic video that ridiculed Islam's Prophet Muhammad and ignited mob protests on U.S. embassies around the Middle East and in North Africa. Now, the administration has begun to call it a terrorist attack carried out by al-Qaida-linked militants and explain that it was a planned attack distinct from the mob protests in the region.
Republicans have seized on the Obama administration's changing narrative, saying the administration was too slow to label it a terrorist attack because, they said, the White House did not want to admit its policies had failed to defeat al-Qaida, and quell anti-American sentiment in the Muslim world.
"Throughout our investigation we continued to emphasize that information gathered was preliminary and evolving," DNI spokesman Shawn Turner's statement said.
"It remains unclear if any group or person exercised overall command and control of the attack, and if extremist group leaders directed their members to participate. However, we do assess that some of those involved were linked to groups affiliated with, or sympathetic to al-Qaida," he said.
At the same time, a spokeswoman for Rice also sought to explain comments that Rice made early in the investigation saying there was no evidence the Benghazi attack was premeditated.
"During her appearances on the Sunday talk shows Sept. 16, 2012, Ambassador Rice's comments were prefaced at every turn with a clear statement that an FBI investigation was under way that would provide the definitive accounting of the events that took place in Benghazi," said Erin Pelton, spokeswoman for the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. "At every turn Ambassador Rice provided — and said she was providing — the best information and the best assessment that the administration had at the time, based on what was provided to Ambassador Rice and other senior U.S. officials by the U.S. intelligence community."
Further intelligence may be slow to arrive. The FBI team that arrived in Libya last week to investigate the incident can't get to the scene of the attack because it is too dangerous, according to two law enforcement officials. The officials requested anonymity because they are not authorized to speak publicly about an ongoing investigation.
Republicans have seen the Libya attack as an opportunity to attack President Barack Obama on one of his strengths, foreign policy.
Recent intelligence reports indicated a force of more than 50 heavily armed extremists attacked the consulate, using gun trucks for added firepower, and establishing a perimeter to limit access to the compound and catch any Americans who might try to escape. A first wave of attacks set fire to the main building, forcing the Americans to flee to a fallback building a half mile away, where a second group of extremists attacked with mortar fire. Stevens died of apparent smoke inhalation when he was caught inside the main consulate building, becoming separated from the other fleeing diplomats.
Urgent Poll: Romney or Obama to Handle Foreign Crisis? Vote Here!
Intelligence officials have focused their attention on Ansar al-Shariah, a Libyan militant group led by a former detainee at the U.S. military-run prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Thursday that there has been a "thread of intelligence reporting" about groups in eastern Libya trying to coalesce but no specific threat to the consulate.
Read more on Newsmax.com: Peter King Calls for Susan Rice's Resignation
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!
|
||||||||
|
Ver la publicación en Facebook
· Editar la configuración del
correo electrónico · Responde a este mensaje para hacer un
comentario.
|
36 dias
para sacarlo de la Casa Blanca .
ENVIEN “EN MI OPINION” A
SUS CONTACTOS
Lázaro R González Miño
“Salmo109” 7-Cuando
fuere juzgado salga culpable; 8-Sean sus días pocos; tome otro su oficio,
Porque tuyo es El Reino, El Poder y La Gloria
Eterna. AMEN
No comments:
Post a Comment