No 773 “En mi opinión” Octubre 21, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com EDITOR
Petition
to Demand the Resignation of President Obama
Sign now!
To
join the call to demand that President Obama resign,
submit your email address (and, optionally, your name) and click the button
when done. Once our petition reaches 100,000 signatories, we will present our
petition to the U.S. Congress. We will also keep you in the loop on this and
other important stories by sending you newsletters from Minutemen News andThe Black
Sphere; don’t worry, you can unsubscribe at
any time if you find that’s not for you.
This is an unprecedented time in our
nation’s history. The American people are outraged by the display of
unconstitutional, corrupt, immoral, and criminal actions by President Barack
Obama and his Administration. We, the people, demand justice. We, the people,
demand that President Barack Hussein Obama resign immediately.
We, the people, present the following:
The IRS Scandal:
§ Whereas: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
intentionally abused their power by targeting conservative organizations; and
§ Whereas: These actions demonstrate that the IRS was
being used as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
§ Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to
knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective
or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the
American people; and
§ Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a
message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against
the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§ Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full
disclosure of the matters concerning the IRS scandal; and swift, expedient
action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to
the fullest extent of the law.
§ Whereas: Key members of the Obama Administration,
seemingly with President Obama’s knowledge, willfully denied support to the
American ambassador and other brave Americans while they were under attack in
Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012; and
§ Whereas: The ensuing cover-up, including the intent to
deceive the American people about the nature of the attack, was politically
motivated for the advancement of Barack Obama’s re-election campaign; and
Whereas: The truths uncovered to date, which are too many to list, prove that the death of four Americans was exploited as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
Whereas: The truths uncovered to date, which are too many to list, prove that the death of four Americans was exploited as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
§ Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to
knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective
or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the
American people; and
§ Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a
message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against
the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§ Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full
disclosure of the matters concerning the Benghazi scandal; and swift, expedient
action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to
the fullest extent of the law.
The Associated Press Scandal:
§ Whereas: The Obama Administration’s Department of
Justice secretly obtained private telephone and fax records of Associated Press
reporters and editors; and
§ Whereas: The communicated intent, once this seizure
was revealed, was to search for government leaks; the perceived intent was an
attempt by government officials to intimidate and manipulate freedom of the
press; and
§ Whereas: The Department of Justice violated its own
regulations which recognize the importance of freedom of the press, and
exceeded their authority for the purposes of partisan, political manipulation
and advantage; and
§ Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to
knowledge of the actions of his Administration; deeming him either ineffective
or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the
American people; and
§ Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a
message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against
the American people, and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§ Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full
disclosure of the matters concerning the Associated Press scandal; and swift,
expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United
States, to the fullest extent of the law.
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of- president-obama/#ixzz3GiRZba00
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of-president-obama/#aXkWpbey68KIrCce.99
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of- president-obama/#ixzz3GiRZba00
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of-president-obama/#aXkWpbey68KIrCce.99
8 Ways the
Federal Government is Blocking Information
Check
it out:
If
you’re still unsure whether or not federal government abuses its power, this
list from Associated Press Washington Bureau Chief Sally Buzbee will convince
you.
The
following are eight ways the current administration is making it hard for
journalists to find information and cover the news:
1.
As the United States ramps up its fight against Islamic militants, the public
can’t see any of it.
2.
The White House once fought to get cameramen, photographers and reporters into
meetings the president had with foreign leaders
overseas. That access has become much rarer.
3.
Guantanamo: The big important 9/11 trial is finally coming up. But we aren’t
allowed to see most court filings in real time — even of nonclassified
material.
4.
Information about Guantanamo that was routinely released under President George
W. Bush is now kept secret.
5.
Day-to-day intimidation of sources is chilling. AP’s transportation reporter’s
sources say that if they are caught talking to her, they will be fired.
6.
One of the media — and public’s — most important legal tools, the Freedom of Information Act, is under
siege. Requests for information under FOIA have become slow and expensive.
7.
The administration uses FOIAs as a tip service to uncover what news
organizations are pursuing.
8.
The administration is trying to control the information that state and local
officials can give out. The FBI has directed local police not to disclose
details about surveillance technology the police departments use to sweep up
cellphone data.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/10/8-ways-federal-government-blocking-information/
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/10/8-ways-federal-government-blocking-information/
100,000
Haitians to be Allowed into the US Without Visas by Obama
With all the risks we are assuming, and all the problems with illegal
immigration, of course we would just INVITE a whole bunch more people into the
US – without a visa, naturally.
Calling it “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s
authority,” Senator Charles Grassley, ranking Republican on the Judiciary
Committee, is criticizing an executive order issued by the president that would
allow at least 100,000 Haitian nationals into the United States to be “reunited
with their families.”
Washington Times:
“Which countries are next on President Obama’s list?” Mr. Grassley said. “Will there by medical screenings before entry? Will work permits be granted automatically? How will this affect American workers?”
“Which countries are next on President Obama’s list?” Mr. Grassley said. “Will there by medical screenings before entry? Will work permits be granted automatically? How will this affect American workers?”
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the branch of the Department
of Homeland Security that handles immigration benefits cases, announced Friday
the program to unite Haitians already living in the U.S. with family members
abroad will ramp up in 2015.
At that time the State Department’s National Visa Center will begin
notifying families who may be eligible to take part in the program. Those
immigrants will allowed to apply for work permits while waiting for issuance of
their permanent visas.
The agency said the program will expedite “safe, legal and orderly
migration.”
A similar program that reunited Central American children with their
parents had a fraud rate of about 70%.
Or how about NOT. Maybe we should DEPORT the people HERE and using all
of our social welfare programs, free medical and food stamps, and reunite them
in their home countries? That seems like a WAAAAAY better use of resources.
Should Obama be able to use his power to make this happen? Should the
administration be able to import 100,000 more PROBLEMS for America?
http://www.rightwingnews.com/top-news/100000-hatians-allowed-us-without-visas-obama/
http://www.rightwingnews.com/top-news/100000-hatians-allowed-us-without-visas-obama/
US Ordering 34 Million Green Cards for Illegal Plan
With some lawmakers predicting a sweeping executive order on immigration from
President Barack Obama after the Nov. 4 elections, one federal agency is
already making plans to hire a vendor to crank out up to 34 million blank
green cards to accommodate an expected surge in immigrants in 2016.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has published a draft solicitation for a contractor capable of producing 4 million cards a year for five years — and 9 million in the early stages — that would allow immigrants to live and work in the country, Breitbart reports.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has published a draft solicitation for a contractor capable of producing 4 million cards a year for five years — and 9 million in the early stages — that would allow immigrants to live and work in the country, Breitbart reports.
One estimate suggests 34 million cards will be printed in total.
An official from the government agency told MailOnline on Monday a plan was developed "in case the president makes the move we think he will," even though the agency's Document Management Division isn't yet committing to buying the materials.
Another official cautioned the plan was only a "contingency" in case immigration reform legislation passes in Congress, stressing to MailOnline it wasn't in anticipation of an Obama executive order.
The president was rebuffed by Congress to enact immigration reform — which Republicans have decried as an "amnesty" for millions of illegal immigrants, including hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors who poured into the United States through the southern border with Mexico this summer – and has vowed to go it alone.
The executive action's timetable has since shifted to after the crucial midterm elections.
The latest draft solicitation "seems to indicate that the president is contemplating an enormous executive action that is even more expansive than the plan that Congress rejected in the 'Gang of Eight' bill," Jessica Vaughn, an immigration expert at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Breitbart.
The green cards – officially known as Permanent Residency Cards – and Employment Authorization Documentation cards are used for participants in Obama's controversial Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Known as "DREAMers," the program's participants came to the United States illegally as children.
A total of 862,000 people have been approved for such documentation by USCIS through June.
But according to the draft solicitation, "the guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. ... The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards."
On CNN's "Inside Politics" Monday, moderator John King said he unilateral executive action promised by Obama for after the midterm elections will kick off confrontation, not compromise, from Republicans driven by anger and frustration in their conservative grass-roots voter base.
"Well, if you believed perhaps there would be room and motivation for a deal after the 2014 midterms — think again," King said.
"I was so struck by conversations in Colorado, in Kansas and Iowa — just pure frustration; a belief among conservative Republicans that this problem is getting worse.
"What does that tell you? It tells you there is no prospect for any compromise legislation during the final two years of the Obama presidency," King said.
"If the president uses his executive power as promised, Republicans will be pushing the grass-roots for confrontation, not compromise. An issue we thought after 2014 Republicans would try to deal with, will be with us until 2016 and beyond."
There is little doubt that Obama is determined to take action.
"There appears to be little political space for House Speaker John Boehner and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, who could well be majority leader in January, to negotiate any deal that would be acceptable to Obama," CNN reports.
"When the president takes executive actions, as he promises to do after the election unless there is some legislative breakthrough, it is clear the conservative grass-roots will demand confrontation, leaving the issue front and center as we head into the 2016 presidential cycle."
Related Stories:
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/green-card-immigration-surge/2014/10/19/id/601688/#ixzz3GkBlGfCw
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Amenper: The Final Solution, Nigeria is Ebola free.
Nigeria's containment of Ebola is a "spectacular success story,"
said Rui Gama Vaz, WHO director for Nigeria
Some 9,000 people have been infected with Ebola, and about 8.999.5 have
died, mostly in hard-hit Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia, with the number of
cases expected to increase exponentially in the coming weeks.
Dr. Simon Marvel, one of the world's leading experts on viral hemorrhagic
fevers, says that the final solution of Ebola in Nigeria should be an example
for the world.
The
last case was executed last night, now Nigeria is Ebola free. Any
new case will be disposed accordingly as soon as it is detected
We have being able to stop the spreading of the disease by human-to-human
transmission of Ebola by permanently isolating the persons that have
tested positive for Ebola.
Ron Klain, Ebola Czar. recently appointed by President Obama, said
that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are working on revisions to
safety protocols. The new protocols will take into consideration the model of
Nigeria.
Because of its success, Nigeria’s model could be included in the new
protocol immediately in the United States.
He said if any other person test positive for Ebola, a plan is in place
that includes the new protocols.
Klain said that it is imperative for the country, not to have any other
case of Ebola before the Midterm elections.
Kick Them Out: 55 Florida Mayors Who
Are Anti-Second Amendment And Pro-Bloomberg
If your mayor is on the list, inform them of your
dissatisfaction or better yet, vote them out of office this up coming election.
As
unlikely as it may seem to those of us who pay attention to Second Amendment
issues, there may still be some Florida Mayors Against illegal Guns (MAIG)
Mayors who have been mislead by lies fed to them by Bloomberg’s anti-gun group.
We
have the emails sent to Florida Mayors from MAIG claiming that they support the
Second Amendment, we even have emails from known anti-gun Police Chiefs and
Sheriffs reassuring some mayors that MAIG is just “helping to target illegal guns, not legal gun
owners”.
They
may not have noticed that MAIG has opposed every pro-gun and pro-self-defense
legislative initiative proposed in Florida and nationally since the group was
founded.
|
Florida’s 55 Bloomberg MAIG Mayors
|
||
|
Mayor
|
City/County
|
email/Contact
|
|
Susan Gottlieb
|
Aventura
|
|
|
Jean Rosenfield
|
Bal Harbour
|
|
|
Robert Yaffe
|
Bay Harbor Islands
|
|
|
David Coviello
|
Biscayne Park
|
|
|
Jerry Taylor
|
Boynton Beach
|
|
|
Rocky Randels
|
Cape Canaveral
|
|
|
Greg Ross
|
Cooper City
|
|
|
Jim Cason
|
Coral Gables
|
|
|
Walter B. Duke
|
Dania Beach
|
|
|
Judy Paul
|
Davie
|
|
|
Derrick L. Henry
|
Daytona Beach
|
|
|
Cary Glickstein
|
Delray Beach
|
|
|
Bruce Mount
|
Eatonville
|
|
|
Daisy Black
|
El Portal
|
|
|
Glenn Singer
|
Golden Beach
|
|
|
Samuel J. Ferreri
|
Greenacres
|
|
|
Charles Sanders
|
Greenwood
|
|
|
Samuel Henderson
|
Gulfport
|
|
|
Joy Cooper
|
Hallandale Beach
|
|
|
Peter Bober
|
Hollywood
|
|
|
Ken Schultz
|
Hypoluxo
|
|
|
Ted Blackburn
|
Islamorada
|
|
|
Marlene M. Wagner
|
Lake Hamilton
|
|
|
|
|
QUIT
MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
|
|
Barrington Russell
|
Lauderdale Lakes
|
|
|
Richard J. Kaplan
|
Lauderhill
|
|
|
Howard Schieferdecker
|
Maitland
|
|
|
Tomás Regalado
|
Miami
|
|
|
Philip Levine
|
Miami Beach
|
|
|
Oliver G. Gilbert
|
Miami Gardens
|
|
|
Wayne Slaton
|
Miami Lakes
|
|
|
Carlos Gimenez
|
Miami Dade County
|
|
|
Lori C. Moseley
|
Miramar
|
|
|
Connie Leon-Kreps
|
North Bay Village
|
|
|
Jack Brady
|
North Lauderdale
|
|
|
|
|
QUIT
MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
|
|
|
|
QUIT
MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
|
|
|
|
QUIT
MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
|
|
Myra Taylor
|
Opa-Locka
|
|
|
Buddy Dyer
|
Orlando
|
|
|
|
|
QUIT
MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
|
|
Colin Walkes
|
Pahokee
|
|
|
William Capote
|
Palm Bay
|
|
|
Shelley Stanczyk
|
Palmetto Bay
|
|
|
Frank C. Ortis
|
Pembroke Pines
|
|
|
Cindy Lerner
|
Pinecrest
|
|
|
Diane Veltri Bendekovic
|
Plantation
|
|
|
Thomas A. Masters
|
Riviera Beach
|
|
|
Philip K. Stoddard
|
South Miami
|
|
|
Rick Kriseman
|
St. Petersberg
|
|
|
Norman Edelcup
|
Sunny Isles Beach
|
|
|
Michael J. Ryan
|
Sunrise
|
|
|
Daniel Dietch
|
Surfside
|
|
|
John Marks
|
Tallahassee
|
|
|
Jeri Muoio
|
West Palm Beach
|
|
|
Eric H. Jones
|
West Park
|
|
|
Daniel J. Stermer
|
Weston
|
|
|
Dr Helen B. Miller
|
White Springs
|
|
|
Gary Resnick
|
Wilton Manors
|
|
|
Juan Otero
|
Zolfo Springs
|
|
Amenper: Hillary for
President? Maybe yes, maybe not.
Glenn Beck
may not want to vote for Hillary Clinton, but he is convinced that she will win
the presidency in 2016. Beck, the conservative radio and television host, used
part of his radio show on Tuesday to talk about the prospect of Clinton
running for president and why, if she does, she "will be the next
president of the United States."
"She is going
to win," Beck said, matter-of-factly, because Clinton will convince voters
that she is the candidate that can take the United States back to "the
golden years" of Bill Clinton's administration.
Yes,
Hillary Clinton is running for president, and she is running away from
President Barack Obama's record on foreign policy, she has drawn sharp
distinctions between her view of America's role in the world and those of the
President, while also expressing significant disagreements with him over the
right approach to ongoing crises in the Middle East.
But
with all the respect I have for Glenn, and with all the respect I have to the
evil intelligence of Hillary, it bothers my mind to think that whoever the
republican candidate is going to be, he will remain silent about who Hillary is
and about her record.
From
her days as first lady when she tried to socialize medicine, with a plan even
worse than Obamacare, to her recent tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary has
been not only a failure, but a disgrace for the country with the highest point
of her career being the Benghazi catastrophe..
Hillary Clinton
didn’t do much during her time in the U.S. Senate, relying on records collected by former Clinton adviser Dick Morris, the
legislation Clinton passed during her first five years in the Senate had little
substance. The vast majority of bills, according, were purely symbolic or would
have passed without Clinton’s support
Morris tells us
that even though she didn’t have much of a legislative impact in the Senate,
Clinton did spend a lot of time befriending "moderate" Republicans
like Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), who could
potentially support her in a presidential campaign. (my question, will they
dare?).Hillary Clinton is extremely ambitious, shortly after Bill
Clinton graduated Yale Law School, Hillary was already telling colleagues that
he was going to be president. Hillary private slogan for her and her husband
was “eight years of Bill, eight years of Hill.”
At
Wellesley College, Clinton wrote her senior thesis on Saul Alinsky,( the known
Marxist) discussing Alinky's community organizing tactics, but later
found them to be “too idealistic and simplistic,” according to Bill Clinton’s
biographer David Maraniss.
In
other words Hillary was even more radical than Alinsky according to her
biographer.
There
are other books and articles that show us the character of our
"next president, here are quotes and incident in Hillary's life:
From the book
"I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper,p. 20 -
Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous
taxpayer-funded health care plan)
We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices....
Government has to make those choices for people"
(From the book
"I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper,p. 76 -
Hillary in 1996)
"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe"
(From the book "Inside" by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer
"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe"
(From the book "Inside" by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer
You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!"
(From the book
"American Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - Hillary
to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good
morning"
F**k off! It's enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I'm
not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your
mouth shut."
(From the book
"The First Partner" p. 259 - Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who
was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in
case of an incident.)
"If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass
over here and grab those bags!"
(From the book
"Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 -
Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive
female at an Arkansas political rally)
"Come on Bill, put your dick up! You
can't f**k her here!!"
(From the
book "The Truth About Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5 -
Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer)
"Where's the miserable c*ck sucker?"
This ill-tempered,
violent, foul mouthed, hateful and abusive woman, this bitch wants to be our
president and have total control as commander-in-chief of a military that her
party so openly and proudly admit they detest. I can see someone like this
gaining the respect of other nations, and especially from their leaders, who
refuse to do as she tells them "por mis ovarios" ... or
else.
No thanks, our
country deserves a better leader, not a dominatrix!
I don't think that
the people could ignore this, I think that Glenn is kidding us, he is a kidder,
and he is just scaring us to get us to go out and vote, and we will get out and
vote, you bet, Glenn.
But it is also my
believe that Hillary is not going to be the democratic candidate, and that is
also a dangerous proposition, because.... who is going to be the other bitch?.
Uncle of
Benghazi Victim: Will We Ever Learn?
President Obama and Hillary
Clinton after his remarks during the ceremony at Joint Base Andrews, marking
the return to the United States of the remains of J. Christopher Stevens, U.S.
Ambassador to Libya; Sean Smith, Information Management Officer; and Security
Personnel Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, who were killed in the attack on the
U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. (Photo: Pete Souza/White House/Sipa Press)
Michael
Ingmire is a musician, writer and activist living in North Carolina. He is the
uncle of Benghazi victim Sean Smith and has been an active voice in the pursuit
of truth and accountability about Benghazi.
Most
news accounts of the attack on Benghazi say it cost the lives of U.S.
Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
My
nephew Sean Smith was one of those other Americans.
It’s
been a frustrating two years since Sean died serving his country on Sept. 11,
2012. There have been countless news reports, multiple congressional
investigations and more than one set of recommendations that either should’ve
been followed before the attacks or that should be addressed going forward.
But
when it comes to definitive answers on what happened, how and why my nephew
died that night, and what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the
future, we’re still waiting and wondering and hurting and asking.
That’s
why I made the journey from my home in North Carolina to the first hearing of
the Benghazi Select Committee on Sept. 17.
It
is important for me and my family to get to the truth and to honor the memory
of my nephew, who was an information officer for the State Department.
As
I sat in the hearing room in the U.S. Capitol, I considered the history of the
moment. I thought back to similar hearings on Watergate and Iran-Contra. I
believe Benghazi ranks with them on the list of the biggest cover-ups in
American history.
The
hot, white lights reminded me that sometimes the brightest light is needed to
uncover the darkest truth.
The
approach by the committee, particularly the bipartisan cooperation between the
chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings,
D-Md., gave me confidence this is a serious investigative body with little to
none of the partisan grandstanding that marred earlier Benghazi hearings before
the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
A burnt building is seen at the United States consulate, one day after
armed men stormed the compound and killed the U.S. Ambassador Christopher
Stevens and three others in Benghazi, Libya on September 12, 2012. (Photo:
Tariq AL-hun/Newscom)
Then
the hearing began. Its focus and the ramifications of what it covered horrified
me both as an American citizen and a Benghazi victim family member.
The
hearing dealt with the Benghazi Accountability Review Board report produced
nearly a year earlier by Adm. Mike Mullen and Ambassador Thomas Pickering.
The
witnesses were Gregory Starr, assistant secretary for diplomatic security at
the State Department; Todd Keil, a member of the independent panel on best
practices, and Mark Sullivan, chairman of the independent panel on best
practices.
The
history of Accountability Review Board reports—whether about Beirut, Kenya or
Benghazi—shows the State Department accepts the conclusions, promises to do
better, then does little to implement the substantive security recommendations.
A
truly revelatory moment occurred when Gowdy quoted from an Accountability
Review Board report: “We are disturbed at the inadequacy of resources to
provide security against terrorist attacks. We are disturbed at the relative
low priority accorded security concerns, and we praise the ambassador for
seeking security enhancements before the attack.”
Patricia Smith, mother of American Sean Smith who was killed in the
Benghazi attack, wipes away tears while testifying during the US House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee hearing on ‘Reviews of the Benghazi Attacks and
Unanswered Questions’, on Capitol Hill September 10, 2013. (Photo: Michael
Reynolds/Newscom)
Only
that report was not about Benghazi. It was written in 1999 about the 1998 attack
on the U.S. Embassy in Kenya. We should not be able to cut and paste key items
of these reports; we should be learning what works and should be making
adjustments. But we don’t.
We’re
slow to even find out what went wrong. And when we do, and we realize this
could’ve been prevented if we had acted on past recommendations, we’re even
slower to hold people accountable.
There
are some questions I have for the Benghazi Select Committee:
1.
Why was Stevens sent to this dangerous part of the world on the anniversary of
9/11 without adequate security? Why didn’t then-Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton personally oversee the security guidelines or even review the risk
assessment for this “diplomatic mission” facility?
2.
For that matter, why has Secretary of State John Kerry still not appointed an
undersecretary of diplomatic security, as has been recommended in previous
Accountability Review Board reports? Will he be called to testify? Will Hillary
Clinton or Leon Panetta?
3.
Finally, what were we doing in Benghazi in the first place?
The
most disturbing lessons about Benghazi are that the U.S. government has learned
nothing, and the most important recommendations of the Benghazi panel, as well
as previous Accountability Review Board reports, still have not been
implemented.
Sean’s
mother Pat and I do not want to see other Americans lose their lives like this.
We
removed a fourth-tier dictator in Libya and armed Islamic rebels who turned
around and killed American citizens. Once again, in the name of fighting ISIS,
we are repeating similar mistakes, and our battle plans are being dictated by
Islamic heads of state. Repetition of error is the true definition of insanity.
VA officials retire with benefits before they
can be fired (Descarados o Inmorales???)
“You
can’t fire me – I’m retiring with full taxpayer-funded benefits!” appears to be
the battle cry among the very few high officials held accountable for failure
or corruption during the Obama years.
First
we had IRS scandal kingpin Lois Lerner riding off into the sunset, her
saddlebags stuffed full of lavish pension and benefit money (although, as she
hastened to point out during a laughable effort to cadge some public sympathy
with a softball interview, not enough to keep her in the style to which she has
become accustomed.) Now the Wall Street Journal reports that VA officials
caught up in the secret death-list scandal are pulling the rip cords on their
golden parachutes, and the Administration is letting them get away with it. Try
to contain your shock.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34197/va-officials-retire-benefits-can-fired/
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34197/va-officials-retire-benefits-can-fired/
Amenper: Racismo
Cerca de 400 personas estaban parados detrás de barricadas coreando
"Vergüenza en el Met!" y portando carteles diciendo "El Met
glorifica el terrorismo" antes de la primera actuación programada de
"La muerte de Klinghoffer".
La ópera se basa en el asesinato de 1985 del pasajero paralítico Leon
Klinghoffer en el Achille Lauro, un barco de crucero italiano secuestrado por
cuatro miembros del frente de Liberación Palestina.
El ‘anciano” de 69 años de edad fue tirado en su silla de ruedas y empujado
por la borda en alta mar. El compositor John Adams según he leído
del libreto de la ópera, realmente justifica el hecho, no sé si lo hace por
convicciones políticas o por ganar notoriedad.
Pero el punto no es el crimen que no tiene justificación, ya sea de un
judío o un chino en una silla de ruedas.
El punto tampoco es defender a los judíos, ellos saben defenderse.
Y de eso se trata, a través de los años los judíos han tomado un poder que
nadie se atrevía a hacer algo ni parecido a lo que ha hecho Abrams. Y hoy, el
alcalde DeBlasio lo defiende.
Esto trae una comparación de poderes, los nuevos recipientes del poder que
tenían los judíos, son los negros y un poder salvaje y sin límites.
Piensen por un momento que la ópera hubiera sido justificando a miembros
del KKK colgando a un negro de una guácima, bueno en el sur no habían guácimas,
pero de un sauce sureño-
Las protestas no hubieran sido tan civilizadas y el alcalde no se hubiera
atrevido a defender al compositor.
Lo que hubiéramos visto es la destrucción de teatro de la Met. Hubiera
ardido en llamas, y como es claro se hubieran justificados los actos de la
turba.
El ejemplo lo vemos en Ferguson, según avanza el juicio, vemos que el
policía estaba justificado en matar al “niño” de 250 libras que le cayó arriba
en el carro para quitarle la pistola. Pero las protestas, los
ataques violentos a los blancos, la muerte de un policía a manos de un negro
“desconocido” aumentan cada vez más según aparecen las pruebas de las
inocencias del oficial Wilson.
Pero toda la violencia pasa sin mayores críticas, todo es justificable
porque mataron a un negro, no importa si el negro era culpable o no lo era.
Eso es el racismo que vemos en estos tiempos. En el pasado, hubo
segregación, abusos, discriminación y crímenes contra los negros en el Sur, no
se puede negar, pero eran otros negros, no los que vemos ahora y las
condiciones de los negros hoy no es lo mismo que en los años 50s.
Las protestas de hoy simplemente son un racismo a la inversa, un racismo
contra un blanco sin darle la oportunidad de defenderse en el sistema legal de
la nación, declarándolo culpable sin juicio. Si el sistema judicial
encuentra razones para absolverlo, entonces arderá Troya, y se justificarán los
desmanes, y los culpables no serán juzgados.
Si esto no es una repetición de los tiempos de la segregación, cuando los
blancos podían matar a un negro sin consecuencias, una repetición de los
hechos, pero a la inversa, entonces lo que estamos viendo es esconder la
realidad detrás de una corrección política. Esto es la nueva
discriminación, el nuevo apartheid, y el que no lo vea es porque no lo quiere
ver.
Pero si vamos a justificar a los negros, tenemos que justificar a los
palestinos, como hace Abrams.
Lo que dice el compositor es que la muerte de Kinghoffer era un resultado
de la opresión de los palestinos por los judíos, y esto es lo mismo que nos
dicen ahora, que los desmanes de los negros es el resultado de la
discriminación de los negros por los blancos en ell pasado.
Pero no se puede juzgar un hecho presente por el pasado y mucho menos cuando
los que cometen los delitos no vivieron en el pasado pero en el presente, ya
sean negros o palestinos.
Amenper: Extraterrestrials?
There’s a great
deal of content, here and elsewhere, about UFO visits. No point in hashing that
out in much detail. But let’s suppose, as a matter of brute fact, that we were
able to verify with a high degree of certainty that an alien spacecraft flew
the skies over Earth, and all we knew for certain about it was that it was
extraterrestrial in origin. What would that tell us?
Well, we can
assume to begin with that if the craft serves a purpose, it would probably be
reasonably assumed that the entity that sent the craft didn’t want to hide it.
We’ve already discovered technology that would allow us in principle to make
aircraft invisible, and we can assume that any alien civilization capable of
traveling to Earth would be similarly familiar with nanomaterials
The civilization
sending them is trolling us—and maybe being a little cruel about it.
In other words: if
any UFOs really are manned alien spacecraft, I think they’re probably full of
obnoxious space beings that may be changed lo look like us, who want to live
among us. They may have been living among us for years; they could
be holding public offices right now
Many will recall
that on 1947, witnesses claim that an unidentified object with five aliens
aboard crashed onto a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico.
This is a
well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the U.S. Air
Force and the federal government.
However, you may
NOT know that more or less around nine months after that historic day, Albert
Arnold Gore, and, Hillary Clinton, were born.
Joe
Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Eric Holder, Charles E. Schumer, and Barbara
Boxer were born in dates coinciding with various UFO sightings.
There were also
sightings of a UFO over the island of Cuba, in 1961, near a town called Sagua
la Grande, where Ann Durham, the mother of President Obama was living at the
time.
Does this have
anything to do with our President birth? Nobody knows, but anything
is possible,
There are many
cases of Aliens abducting and impregnating human women.
The stories
say that when the alien impregnate a woman, they say the woman is
"carrying the future." They refer to the "children of the
future." They talk about a "change" coming—a difficult change
but an inevitable one. What we are seeing in the abduction phenomenon is
apparently a process.
The questions are,
are these descendants of extraterrestrials. superior beings that they sent to
control earth? or are they rejects that the alien civilization decided to send
to earth as unwanted trash?
We don't know, but
this piece of information has now cleared up a lot of things
What's
wrong with obama and the firings???
This needs
to be on the front page of every Newspaper in this nation!
Obama is
setting us up for another pearl harbor!!!
What is wrong with this five first line US nuclear carriers docked together in one place. Just like Battleship Row, Pearl Harbor , December 7, 1941.
This picture was taken the February 2014
in Norfolk , Virginia … Obama ordered 5 nuclear carriers into harbor for
"routine" (?) inspections. Heads of the Navy were flabbergasted by
the directive but had to comply as it was a direct order from their
Commander-in-Chief.
The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role leaving our land forces naked and exposed!
The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role leaving our land forces naked and exposed!
NORFOLK, VA. (February 8, 2014). This is
the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were
docked together. USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS George H.W. Bush (CVN
77), USS Enterprise (CVN 65), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), and USS Abraham
Lincoln (CVN 72) are all in port at Naval Station Norfolk , Va. , the world’s
largest naval station.
Knowledgeable Sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces.
(U..S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released).
Knowledgeable Sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces.
(U..S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released).
Obama is ‘Commander in chief’.
This ordering of most of the Navy's capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor ! This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.
This ordering of most of the Navy's capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor ! This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, why did the following happen?
Is this a routine changing of the guard? Or what? Sounds more like a Purge!
|
Major General Paul Vallely (Ret):
This long list of senior military
officers and one sergeant major
comes
at no great surprise to me because of the direction this
country
is heading.
Here
is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:
Commanding Generals fired: · General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012) · Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013) · Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013) · Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013) · Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011) · Major General Charles MM. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013) · General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013) · Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point , NY (2013) · Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013) · General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013) · Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico 's Security Battalion (Oct 2013) · General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010) · General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009) · General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012) · Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013) · Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013) · Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013) · Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013) Commanding Admirals fired: · Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012) · Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)
Naval
Officers fired: (All in 2011)
· Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011) · Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs , NY (Aug 2011) · Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011) · Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011) · Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story , VA (Aug 2011) · Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011) · Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (Jun 2011) · Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011) · Commander Kevin Harms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham
Lincoln (Mar 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011) · Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011) · Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego
(Apr 2011)
· Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific
(Mar 2011)
· Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011) · Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011) · Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier
Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)
· Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011) · Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota , U.S. Navy Comander Naval Activitis Spain.
(April 1912)
.Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station
Whidbey Island , WA
(Apr 2011)
· Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011) · Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011) · Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011) · Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island , WA (Jul 2011) · Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville , TN (Jul 2011) · Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011) · Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011) · Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011) Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012): · Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012) · Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012) · Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012) · Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012) · Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station's Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic
(Sep 2012)
· Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012) · Captain Daniel Dusek-U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme · Commander David Faught-Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012) · Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012) · Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012) · Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012) · Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012) · Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012) · Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012) · Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012) · Commander Dennis Klein- US. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012) · Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (Jun 2012) · Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012) · Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012) · Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL
(Nov 2012)
· Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012) · Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxe |
Response Action Network Newsletter
Here is your weekly update on the politics and
policies affecting our liberties.
TWITTER SUES
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Tech companies
have complained about federal government demands for information on their
customers and insistence that the companies tell no one about it (or else).
Some, like Google, Apple and LinkedIn, have even tried to push back. The latest
to do so: Twitter, which is taking the federal government to court saying its
demands are a restriction in the company's First Amendment rights:
"In the case of Twitter, their posts are
public, they don't actually get that many requests that are related to national
security, so they want to make that clear to users. In April, Twitter sent the
government a draft copy of its July transparency report asking if it could be
reviewed for publication. They were told they couldn't publish it. Twitter is
saying this is what we call 'prior restraint,' it's a gag order under our First
Amendment. Before we even speak, our First Amendment is violated. So they are
asking now in court to be able to say more."
Twitter's odds of winning in court are
uncertain. Google and others who have sued the federal government ended up
settling their cases out of court. The government still demands information
from them, but the companies can give users a general idea of how many times
the government has asked for information.
In other words, it's a battle of inches, and
there are still miles to go before Big Brother's prying eyes are closed.
Later Obama: Crowd Walks Out On Obama
Mid-Speech
The crowd left before Obama was half way
through his speech. Epic.
In an unusual break from rubbing shoulders with the rich and liberal
at party fundraisers, Obama spoke at a campaign rally in western Maryland for
the state’s lieutenant governor who’s gunning for the top seat in November.
But his audience left their own seats in droves – while the
president was still speaking.
The most amazing part of the rejection at was the crowd’s makeup —
overwhelmingly black – and Obama’s subject: encouraging heavy minority turnout
for the midterm elections.
This is Obama country — Barack Obama Elementary
School is just down the road, and close to 90 percent of votes cast
here in the 2012 presidential election were for him, the best he did in any
county in the state. The crowd was energetic in waiting for the president and
in welcoming him to the stage, but once the president started speaking, the
crowd began streaming out, a few
at first, but then by the dozen once Obama was about 10 minutes into his talk.
This article continues on bizpacreview.com
This article continues on bizpacreview.com
UN NUEVO GENIO INVENTA COMO
DESCUBRIR 3 TIPOS DE CANCER A EDADES TEMPRANAS.
UN NUEVO GENIO INVENTA COMO
DESCUBRIR 3 TIPOS DE CANCER A EDADES TEMPRANAS.
Clemente
Sanchez.
EL NACIMIENTO DE UN GENIO
Se
llama Andraka, parece ser descendiente de Otomanos-Eslavos…
Un chico de 16 años inventó un sensor que
detecta el cáncer en 5 minutos y en etapas tempranas Jack Andraka a los 13 años
perdió a un ser querido por cáncer de páncreas. Se puso a investigar y
descubrió el sensor, que cuesta 3 centavos de dólar.
Los
laboratorios se negaron a apoyarlo porque derriba a la millonaria industria del
cáncer. Una universidad avalará su descubrimiento.
Jack Andraka: para muchos la esperanza. Para los laboratorios, el fin de un negocio.
Jack Andraka: para muchos la esperanza. Para los laboratorios, el fin de un negocio.
Con tan sólo 16 años, un
estudiante estadounidense de secundaria inventó un sensor para detectar el
cáncer en tan sólo cinco minutos.
El descubrimiento puede
cambiar la vida de muchísimas personas, pero también es una amenaza para la
industria farmacéutica, que recauda millones por esta dolorosa enfermedad.
Todo comenzó con la pérdida
de un ser querido cuando Jack Andraka tenía 13 años. Le dijeron que el cáncer
de páncreas se detecta cuando ya no se puede tratar, lo que lo empujó a
investigar sobre el cáncer a través de herramientas sencillas en Internet.
Y tres años después,
descubrió una manera "rápida, simple y efectiva" de detectar esta
enfermedad mortal, que gracias a este invento, podrá neutralizarse. Con
información que obtuvo de Google y Wikipedia, Jack estudió las 8 mil proteínas
que se encuentran en la sangre, hasta entender que una de ellas, la mesotelina,
se dispara en etapas tempranas, en las personas que enferman de cáncer de
páncreas.
"Detecta una de las
miles de proteínas (la mesotelina) que hay en la sangre de los enfermos de
cáncer. La mecánica fue utilizar anticuerpos y entretejerlos en una red de
nanotubos de carbono, de modo que se obtiene un marcador que únicamente
reacciona ante dicha proteína" explicó al presentarse en el Festival de las
Mentes Brillantes.
El invento es un sensor de
papel, que cuesta 3 centavos, y que es capaz de detectar en cinco minutos tres
tipos de cáncer: el de páncreas, el de ovario y el de pulmón.
Pero lo más sorprendente de
todo es que ha sido26 mil veces más barato siendo 168 veces más rápido. Además,
este método es 400 veces más sensible que los actuales y no es invasivo.
Pero su mejor punto a favor es que "se puede detectar el cáncer en las etapas más tempranas, cuando alguien tiene casi 100 por ciento de probabilidades de sobrevivir, y hasta el momento es más de 90 por ciento exacto para detectar el cáncer" dijo. "Y va a ser lo mismo para cáncer ovario y de pulmón" añadía "y cambiando el anticuerpo, este mismo invento puede utilizar una proteína diferente para detectar Alzheimer, otras formas de cáncer o VIH".
Pero su mejor punto a favor es que "se puede detectar el cáncer en las etapas más tempranas, cuando alguien tiene casi 100 por ciento de probabilidades de sobrevivir, y hasta el momento es más de 90 por ciento exacto para detectar el cáncer" dijo. "Y va a ser lo mismo para cáncer ovario y de pulmón" añadía "y cambiando el anticuerpo, este mismo invento puede utilizar una proteína diferente para detectar Alzheimer, otras formas de cáncer o VIH".
Pero no fue nada fácil de
conseguir. De 200 solicitudes que envió a laboratorios, todos se negaron a
continuar con sus investigaciones, excepto uno. Finalmente logró que la Universidad Johns Hopkinsayudará a
su desarrollo.
Es un descubrimiento que
podría afectar a la millonaria industria del cáncer.
Su invento está en etapa de
tramitación de patentes, algo que puede demorar varios años, pero el día que se
apruebe puede resultar toda una revolución para la ciencia médica.
Además, durante la
conferencia, el joven apuntó que la ciencia no debería ser un lujo, y que
debería ser un derecho humano fundamental, "el derecho de acceso a la
información debe ser de todos, no sólo de los que pueden pagar" afirmó.
Un descubrimiento que le ha llevado a ganar el premio Gordon E. Moorede la Feria Internacional de Ciencia e Ingeniería de Intel y el Premio Smithsoniano al Ingenio Estadounidense y es el orador más joven de la Real Sociedad de Medicina en Estados Unidos. Sin duda más que merecido.
Un descubrimiento que le ha llevado a ganar el premio Gordon E. Moorede la Feria Internacional de Ciencia e Ingeniería de Intel y el Premio Smithsoniano al Ingenio Estadounidense y es el orador más joven de la Real Sociedad de Medicina en Estados Unidos. Sin duda más que merecido.
Executive Amnesty Begins
Laws mean
nothing to liberals.
Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of
work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale
executive amnesty may have already begun.
Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge”
scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future
immigration reform initiative requirements.”
The request for proposals says the agency will need a minimum of
four million cards per year. In the “surge,” scenario in 2016, the agency would need an
additional five million cards – more than double the baseline annual amount for
a total of 9 million.
“The guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000
cards. The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards,” the document says.
The agency is buying the materials need to construct both Permanent
Residency Cards (PRC), commonly known as green cards, as well as Employment
Authorization Documentation (EAD) cards which have been used to implement
President Obama’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program. The
RFP does not specify how many of each type of card would be issued.
Alerta la oficina del Tasador
de la Propiedad de estafa de identidad que están haciendo a los propietarios
October 21st, 2014
• Por
medio de una carta que alegan le rebajarían los impuestos le piden sus datos
personales
MIAMI 21 DE OCTUBRE DEL 2014, nhr.com—Las autoridades de
Miami Dade están alertando sobre lo que parece ser una nueva estafa dirigida a
los propietarios de viviendas.
De acuerdo con la oficina del Tasador de la propiedad de
Miami Dade, ellos no han enviado ninguna carta pidiendo información personal
financiera.
El Tasador Lázaro Solís ha emitido una advertencia sobre
una carta que está siendo enviada a los propietarios y la cual está impresa con
el logotipo de la oficina del Tasador de la propiedad y donde se le pide a los
dueños de propiedades que envíen vía fax que clase de líneas de crédito tienen
en sus préstamos hipotecarios, numero de cuentas de cheque, haciéndole ver que
son elegibles para un descuento en sus impuestos.
“Para ofrecerle un mejor alivio en sus impuestos, nuestra
oficina debe comprobar que usted tiene aun una línea de crédito en su hipoteca,
si este es el caso, por favor envíe por fax a nuestra oficina una copia del
monto de su última línea de crédito y copia del estado de cuenta, acompañado de
una copia de un cheque cancelado de su cuenta corriente donde usted quisiera
que le enviemos su reembolso de impuestos”, dice la carta.
Según señala el Tasador Solís, su oficina ha recibido una
cantidad de llamadas de propietarios dando cuenta de la carta, la cual utiliza
todos los números telefónicos correctos de la oficina del Tasador público,
aunque el número de fax es distinto.
Solís esta pidiéndole a los propietarios que notifiquen
inmediatamente a las autoridades si reciben dicha carta.
Si alguien ya ha enviado la información al fax falso,
debe ponerse en contacto con su banco para que tomen las medidas pertinentes en
su cuenta bancaria.
Aunque la Unidad de crímenes económicos de la policía de
Miami Dade ha sido reducida, aun pueden llamar al 305-994-1000 para realizar
las denuncias.
Se distancia el alcalde Tomas
Regalado de la famosa Torre SkyRise
October 20th, 2014
• El alcalde no está de
acuerdo con subsidio que le dará el condado al urbanizador Jeff Berkowitz
MIAMI 20 DE OCTUBRE DE 2014, nhr.com—La posición del
alcalde Tomas Regalado sobre el subsidio de $9 millones que pidió el
urbanizador Jeff Berkowitz lo ha distanciado del proyecto SkyRise por el que
hizo una intensa campaña durante varias semanas y por la que los votantes de
Miami creyeron y votaron.
“Los contribuyentes ganan sin poner un centavo”,decía Regalado en su comercial, “y es que eso es lo que Berkowitz negoció”, según nos dijo.
Regalado declaró el fin de semana que él no estaba
enterado de que el urbanizador Berkowitz estaba pidiendo subsidio al
condado. Aunque el alcalde de Miami ha declarado que no cree que fue engañado
por Berkowitz, el hecho es que tampoco le dijo que estaba pidiéndole al condado
$9 millones de los mismos fondos que decía antes no necesitaría.
“No podemos continuar haciendo las cosas de manera
diferente de lo que prometemos a la gente”, dijo el alcalde Regalado, añadiendo que “no se trata de los $9 millones, se trata de un asunto
moral”.
Pero existe otro detalle en esta trama de los $9 millones
del subsidio, y es que la administración de Miami Dade se lo habían ocultado al
alcalde Miami, fue hace unas semanas que un funcionario de la administración lo
contactó para solicitarle una carta, “le dije claro a Jack Osterholt, que no
estaba de acuerdo con el subsidio”,señaló
Regalado.
Osterholt confirmó esta versión de Regalado, “el se negó a enviar una carta de apoyo”, dijo el vice alcalde.
En el comercial instando a los votantes aprobar la
construcción de la torre SkyRise, el alcalde Regalado decía,“Esto significa más renta y un pago por adelantado de $10
millones para la Ciudad de Miami”,
pero ahora ha declarado que, “dar media vuelta y pedir $9 millones al Condado
aumentaría los impuestos a la propiedad, aunque sea unos centavos para el
contribuyente promedio, pero ese es el tipo de medida que contribuye a
que los votantes no sientan respecto por el gobierno”.
A pesar que Regalado pidió a los comisionados de Miami
Dade que no aprobaran el subsidio a Berkowitz, los comisionados apoyaron la
entrega de los 9 millones para la torre de observación SkyRise.
Clemente
Sanchez: QUE
ES LO MAS IMPORTANTE DE LA VIDA.
En cierta ocasión, durante una charla que di ante un grupo de
abogados, me hicieron esta pregunta: ¿"Qué es lo mas importante que ha
hecho en su vida?"
La respuesta me vino a la mente en el acto, pero no fue la que di,
porque las circunstancias no eran las apropiadas. En mi calidad de abogado de
la industria del espectáculo, sabía que los asistentes deseaban escuchar
anécdotas sobre mi trabajo con las celebridades.
Lo más importante que he hecho en la vida, tuvo lugar el 8 de
octubre de 1990.
Comencé el día jugando golf con un amigo mío al que no había visto
en mucho tiempo. Entre jugada y jugada, conversamos acerca de lo que estaba
pasando en la vida de cada cual. Me contó que su esposa y él acababan de tener
un bebé.
Mientras jugábamos, llegó el padre de mi amigo, que consternado, le
dijo que su bebe había dejado de respirar y lo habían llevado de urgencia al
hospital.
En un instante, mi amigo subió al auto de su padre y se marchó. Por
un momento me quedé donde estaba, sin acertar a moverme, pero luego traté de
pensar qué debía hacer:
¿Seguir a mi amigo al hospital? Mi presencia allí, me dije, no iba
a servir de nada, pues la criatura seguramente estaría al cuidado de médicos y
enfermeras, y nada de lo que yo hiciera o dijera iba a cambiar las cosas.
¿Brindarle mi apoyo moral? Eso, quizás, pero tanto él como su
esposa provenían de familias numerosas, sin duda estarían rodeados de
parientes, que les ofrecerían consuelo y el apoyo necesario, pasara lo que
pasara. Lo único que haría yo sería estorbar. Así, decidí reunirme con ellos e
ir más tarde a ver a mi amigo.
Al poner en marcha el auto, me percaté que mi amigo había dejado su
camioneta con las llaves puestas, estacionada junto a las canchas. Decidí pues,
cerrar el auto e ir al hospital a entregarle las llaves.
Como supuse, la sala de espera estaba llena de familiares que
trataban de consolarlos. Entré sin hacer ruido y me quedé junto a la puerta,
tratando de decidir qué hacer. No tardó en presentarse un médico, que se acercó
a la pareja y, en voz baja les comunicó que su bebé había fallecido.
Durante lo que pareció una eternidad, estuvieron abrazados,
llorando, mientras todos los demás los rodeamos en medio del silencio y el
dolor.
El médico les preguntó sí deseaban estar unos momentos con su hijo.
Mi amigo y su esposa se pusieron de pie, y caminaron resignadamente hacia la
puerta.
Al verme allí, en un rincón, la madre se acercó, me abrazó y
comenzó a llorar. También mi amigo se refugió en mis brazos. "Gracias por
estar aquí, me dijo".
Durante el resto de la mañana, permanecí sentado en la sala de
urgencias del hospital, viendo a mi amigo y a su esposa sostener en brazos a su
bebé y despedirse de él.
Eso, es lo más importante que he hecho en mi vida. Aquella
experiencia me dejó tres enseñanzas:
Primera:
Lo más importante que he hecho en la vida, ocurrió cuando no había
absolutamente nada que yo pudiera hacer. Nada de lo que aprendí en la
universidad, ni en los seis años que llevaba ejerciendo mi profesión, ni todo
lo racional que fui para analizar mis alternativas, me sirvió en tales
circunstancias.
A dos personas les sobrevino una desgracia, y yo era impotente para
remediarla.
Lo único que pude hacer fue acompañarlos y esperar el desenlace.
Pero estar allí en esos momentos, en que alguien me necesitaba, era
lo principal.
Segunda:
Estoy convencido, que lo más importante que he hecho en mi vida,
estuvo a punto de no ocurrir, debido a las cosas que aprendí en la universidad,
al concepto inculcado de ser racional, así como en mi vida profesional. Al
aprender a pensar, casi me olvide de sentir.
Hoy, no tengo duda alguna que debí haber subido al coche sin
titubear, y seguir a mi amigo al hospital.
Tercera:
Aprendí que la vida puede cambiar en un instante. Intelectualmente,
todos sabemos esto, pero creemos que las desdichas les pasan a otros. Así pues,
hacemos planes y concebimos nuestro futuro como algo tan real, que pareciera
que va a ocurrir. Pero, al ubicarnos en el mañana, dejamos de advertir todos
los presentes que pasan junto a nosotros, y olvidamos que perder el empleo,
sufrir una enfermedad grave o un accidente, toparse con un conductor ebrio y
miles de cosas más, pueden alterar ese futuro en un abrir y cerrar de ojos. En
ocasiones, a uno le hace falta vivir una tragedia, para volver a poner las
cosas en perspectiva. Desde aquel día, busqué un equilibrio entre el trabajo y
la vida; aprendí que ningún empleo, por gratificante que sea, compensa perderse
unas vacaciones, romper con la pareja o pasar un día festivo lejos de la
familia.
Y aprendí que lo más importante en la vida, no es ganar dinero, ni
ascender en la escala social, ni recibir honores... Lo más importante en la
vida, es el tiempo que dedicamos a cultivar una amistad.
Sugerencia de Oscar
Fraga sobre las próximas elecciones:
Las
elecciones del próximo martes 4 de noviembre son de suma importancia para el
futuro de nuestro gran país. No debemos pensar como demócratas ni como republicanos,
sino como americanos. Tenemos que votar por candidatos que representen
los mismos valores que hicieron a los Estados Unidos la gran nación que siempre
fue. Tenemos que tener en mente que los ciudadanos son el gobierno, "We
the People." El presidente, los miembros del congreso y nuestros jueces
son solo parte de ese gobierno y no una entidad que tiene el poder absoluto
sobre cada uno de sus ciudadanos.
Es
vital que cada uno de nosotros salgamos a votar ese día y que nos eduquemos
acerca de cada uno de los candidatos. Lo mismo digo sobre cada una de las
enmiendas que aparecerán en la boleta. Lo importante es salir a votar.
Los
anuncios que estamos viendo en la televisión y oyendo en la radio dejan mucho
que desear. Atacan al oponente pero ellos mismos no nos dicen que piensan
hacer si ellos son electos. Mucho de estos anuncios están llenos de
mentiras y de información totalmente errónea y mal intencionada.
Por
vivir en diferentes distritos, cada uno de nosotros tendremos candidatos y
enmiendas diferentes. También habrá casos en los cuales hay candidatos y
enmiendas por lo que todos nosotros votaremos.
Le sugiero
que consideren a los siguientes candidatos y a las explicaciones que los
acompañan en la mayoría de los casos. También les sugiero que consideren
como votar en las enmiendas y las explicaciones que las acompañan. Pero
cada uno de Uds. sabrá cómo quieren votar ese día.
1.
Para gobernador y vicegobernador: Rick Scott y Carlos López Cantera.
Rick Scott tomó las riendas del estado en un momento en que el desempleo
estaba sumamente alto y miles de familias tenían sus propiedades en
foreclosure. Charlie Cris fue republicano, independiente y ahora
demócrata. Dice que va a subir el salario mínimo y ésto suena muy lindo,
pero eso es una función del gobierno federal y no el de un estado.
Ninguno de los candidatos son santos pero hay veces que hay que
elegir el menos de dos males.
2.
Para fiscal general: Pam Bondi
3.
Para Funcionario Principal de Finanzas: Jeff Atwater
4.
Para Comisionado de Agricultura: Adam Putnam
5.
Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 23: Joseph "Joe"
Kaufman
6.
Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 24: Carlos Curbelo.
José "Joe" García es su oponente. Esta en estos momentos
siendo investigado por un caso federal y no olvidemos que el dice que
"Communism works."
7.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 100: Martin a. "Marty"
Feigenbaum
8.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 103: Manny Díaz, Jr. No tiene
nada que ver con el que fué alcalde de la Ciudad de Miami y terminó siendo
millonario en pocos años.
9.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 105: Carlos Trujillo
10.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 110: Jose Oliva
11.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 111: Votar por uno
12.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 112: Daniel Díaz Leyva
13.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 114: Erik Fresen
14.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 115: Michael Bileca
15.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 116: Jose Felíx Díaz/Carmen Sotomayor
16.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 118: Frank Artiles
17.
Representante Estatal, Distrito 119: Jeanette M. Nuñez
18:
Tasador de Inmuebles: Pedro J. García. El ha estudiado toda su vida
para esa posición. Gracias a el, nuestros impuestos a la propiedad
bajaron cuando el estaba en ese cargo. Su contrincante es Eddy Gonzalez,
no luce una mala persona, pero no sabe mucho sobre la posición de tasador ya
que por años fué un Representante Estatal.
19.
Enmienda #1-Water and Land Convervation-Conservación de Aguas y Tierras:
No. (Suena bonito, sobre todo cuando dicen que no nos subiran
nuestros impuestos. Aqui es para que el gobierno sigan comprando tierras
y más tierras y hacer más y más regulaciones. ¿Sabian que apróximadamente
el 80% de las tierras del estado de Nevada han sido compradas por el gobierno?
Todo en nombre del calentamiento global, etc.- Esto se pica y se
extiende!!!) Tengan mucho cuidado porque el lobo viene vestido de obeja.
20.
Enmienda #2-Marihuana: No. Ya el estado de la Florida tiene la ley
Charlotte Webb firmada por el gobernador Rick Scott que permite la venta de la
marihuna medicinal a personas que de verdad lo necesitan. Lean lo que ha
pasado en el estado de Colorado después que ellos votaron a favor. Ahora
la mayoria de los usuarios son jovenes entre los 20 y los 35 años. Ya
estan haciendo galleticas de marihuana y hasta un aceite de cocinar de
marihuana. La marihuana es adictiva, afecta al cerebro y es el primer
paso al uso de drogas mas fuertes. Suena muy bonito como no las quieren
vender.
21.
Enmienda #3-Nombramiento Eventual para Ciertos Cargos Judiciales Vacantes:
No. Esta perfecto de la manera que se hace. No hace falta que
cambien el proceso que esta en vigencia hoy en día. Eso le daria un poder
a los gobernadores de poner a sus amigos ya Uds. saben para que.
22.
Preguntas del Condado-Enmienda para permitir bibliotecas en parques:
No. Ya tenemos suficientes bibliotecas y con las que tenemos ellos
tienens problemas asi que como ahora ellos quieren bibliotecas en los parques.
Parece que le esta patinando el coco.
23.
Preguntas del Condado- Eximir al Parque Regional de Fútbol de
Miami-Dade del Articulo 7: No. Esto es un arma de doble filo.
24.
Preguntas del Condado- Permitir terrenos para acampar y
alojamientos/cabañas en el Parque de Matecumbe: No. Esto también
esta dudoso.Ya tenemos bastantes lugares de alojamientos y para acampar.
Esto impactaria negativamente el medio ambiente de la zona. ¿Quién
sera el contratista y el dueño de esos alojamientos y lugares de acampar?
25.
Enmienda para eximir del Articulo 7 la ampliación de la Universidad
Internacional de la Florida en los predios de la Fería de la Juventud:
No. FIU ya tiene bastante tierra. Ya estan tomando tierras
del otro lado de la Calle 8. Tienen un Campo Universitario en el Norte
que hay que decirle Ud. Quiere tomar los mangos bajitos con el hecho de
que le den esos terrenos. En esos terrenos se llevan a caba muchas
actividades para nuestra comunidad. Pienso que lo mudarian para
Homestead. ¿Cuantas familias pueden ir a Homestead? También FIU ha
hecho muchas cosas en contra de los estudiantes. Cursos lo dividen en dos
sesiones para cobrar más, se quedan con parte del dinero de Florida
Pre-paid,etc. En fin, son un pulpo que lo quiren acaparar todo.
26.
Imponer otro impuesto a la propiedad para cubrir el gasto de construir
una Corte que reemplaze el edificio del Cielito Lindo: No. Ya no
podemos con otro impuesto mas. Si el edificio de la corte esta asi es
porque el Condado la dejo ponerse asi. ¿Dónde han estado los inspectores
todos estos años? Solo piensen lo que le pasaria a Uds. si pusieran algo
fuera de codigo en su propiedad o no cortaran el pasto por un tiempo. . . Si,
le iban a poner una tremenda multa. Recuerden lo que paso con el impuesto
al Jackson Hospital. Ahora tenemos que pagar ese impuesto y el dinero que
el hospital recibia del estado se lo han quitado y se los han dado a otros
hospitales alrededor del estado.
27.
Juez del Condado, Grupo 19: Frank Bocanegra
28.
¿Se deberian retener en sus cargos los tres jueces del Tribunal de
Apelaciones: Thomas Logue, Barbara Lagoa, y Vance E. Salter? (He
tratado de encontrar información sobre ellos y la poca información que esta
disponible dice que han desempeñado bien su cargo).
Piensen
en todos los puntos antes mencionados. Recuerden, la decisión es suya.
Compartan cualquier información que piensen que es importante con sus
familiares y amigos. Pidanles que voten por cualquiera de los candidatos
que ellos merecen que se merecen su voto, pero que voten.
Están son mis sugerencias para
las próximas elecciones el martes 4 de noviembre del 2014.
Usted debe votar por quien
usted desee.
LRGM
Esta es Boleta electoral del próximo Noviembre Martes 4, 2014 en Miami Dade.
REPRESENTANTE ANTE EL CONGRESO,
DISTRITO 23 Joseph Kaufman REP 10
REPRESENTANTE ANTE EL CONGRESO,
DISTRITO 24 Carlos Curbelo REP 15
GOBERNADOR Y VICEGOBERNADOR Rick Scott
REP 17 Carlos Lopez-Cantera
FISCAL GENERAL Pam Bondi REP 22
FUNCIONARIO PRINCIPAL DE FINANZAS Jeff
Atwater REP 25
COMISIONADO DE AGRICULTURA Adam Putnam
REP 27
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 100 Martin A. “Marty” Feigenbaum REP 30
STATE REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 103 Manny Diaz, Jr. REP 33
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 105 Carlos
Trujillo REP 35
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 110
Jose Oliva REP 40
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 112 Daniel
Diaz Leyva REP 44
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 114 Erik
Fresen REP 46
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 115 Michael Bileca REP 50
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 116 Jose Felix Diaz REP 52 Carmen Sotomayor REP 54
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 118 Frank
Artiles REP 56
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 119 Jeanette
M. Nuñez REP 58
TASADOR DE INMUEBLES Pedro J. Garcia
70
No voten por Eddie González
para tasador de inmuebles, porque es un aliado de Carlos Giménez para subirnos
los impuestos.
ENMIENDA CONSTITUCIONAL No. 2 (Mariguana)
VOTE NO
ENMIENDA CONSTITUCIONAL ARTÍCULO X,
SECCIÓN 29
Financiamiento de Proyectos del
Tribunal mediante la Emisión de Bonos de
Obligación General: Hacer una nueva corte con dinero de los
contribuyentes. Vote NO/.
“FREEDOM
IS NOT FREE”
Lázaro R. González
Miño
https://twitter.com/lazarorgonzale2
“En mi opinión”
No comments:
Post a Comment