Tuesday, October 21, 2014

No 773 "En mi opinion" Octubre 21, 2014

No 773 “En mi opinión” Octubre 21, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST”  lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com EDITOR

Petition to Demand the Resignation of President Obama

petition-impeachment

Sign now!

To join the call to demand that President Obama resign, submit your email address (and, optionally, your name) and click the button when done. Once our petition reaches 100,000 signatories, we will present our petition to the U.S. Congress. We will also keep you in the loop on this and other important stories by sending you newsletters from Minutemen News andThe Black Sphere; don’t worry, you can unsubscribe at any time if you find that’s not for you.
Email Address 

Full Name (optional)
This is an unprecedented time in our nation’s history. The American people are outraged by the display of unconstitutional, corrupt, immoral, and criminal actions by President Barack Obama and his Administration. We, the people, demand justice. We, the people, demand that President Barack Hussein Obama resign immediately.
We, the people, present the following:
The IRS Scandal:
§  Whereas: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intentionally abused their power by targeting conservative organizations; and
§  Whereas: These actions demonstrate that the IRS was being used as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
§  Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
§  Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§  Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the IRS scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law.
The Benghazi Scandal:
§  Whereas: Key members of the Obama Administration, seemingly with President Obama’s knowledge, willfully denied support to the American ambassador and other brave Americans while they were under attack in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012; and
§  Whereas: The ensuing cover-up, including the intent to deceive the American people about the nature of the attack, was politically motivated for the advancement of Barack Obama’s re-election campaign; and
Whereas: The truths uncovered to date, which are too many to list, prove that the death of four Americans was exploited as a tool for partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
§  Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration, deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
§  Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§  Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the Benghazi scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law.
The Associated Press Scandal:
§  Whereas: The Obama Administration’s Department of Justice secretly obtained private telephone and fax records of Associated Press reporters and editors; and
§  Whereas: The communicated intent, once this seizure was revealed, was to search for government leaks; the perceived intent was an attempt by government officials to intimidate and manipulate freedom of the press; and
§  Whereas: The Department of Justice violated its own regulations which recognize the importance of freedom of the press, and exceeded their authority for the purposes of partisan, political manipulation and advantage; and
§  Whereas: President Obama will not reveal or admit to knowledge of the actions of his Administration; deeming him either ineffective or deceitful. At a minimum, this makes him guilty of betraying the trust of the American people; and
§  Whereas: Accountability is crucial if we are to send a message to our elected officials and bureaucrats that committing crimes against the American people, and our Constitution will not be tolerated;
§  Therefore: We demand a thorough investigation and full disclosure of the matters concerning the Associated Press scandal; and swift, expedient action against all offenders, including the President of the United States, to the fullest extent of the law.
Read more: 
http://MinutemenNews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of- president-obama/#ixzz3GiRZba00
Read more at
http://minutemennews.com/petition-to-demand-the-resignation-of-president-obama/#aXkWpbey68KIrCce.99


8 Ways the Federal Government is Blocking Information

The federal government is out of control. Help stop them: Rein them in
Check it out:
If you’re still unsure whether or not federal government abuses its power, this list from Associated Press Washington Bureau Chief Sally Buzbee will convince you.
The following are eight ways the current administration is making it hard for journalists to find information and cover the news:
1. As the United States ramps up its fight against Islamic militants, the public can’t see any of it.
2. The White House once fought to get cameramen, photographers and reporters into meetings the president had with foreign leaders overseas. That access has become much rarer.
3. Guantanamo: The big important 9/11 trial is finally coming up. But we aren’t allowed to see most court filings in real time — even of nonclassified material.
4. Information about Guantanamo that was routinely released under President George W. Bush is now kept secret.
5. Day-to-day intimidation of sources is chilling. AP’s transportation reporter’s sources say that if they are caught talking to her, they will be fired.
6. One of the media — and public’s — most important legal tools, the Freedom of Information Act, is under siege. Requests for information under FOIA have become slow and expensive.
7. The administration uses FOIAs as a tip service to uncover what news organizations are pursuing.
8. The administration is trying to control the information that state and local officials can give out. The FBI has directed local police not to disclose details about surveillance technology the police departments use to sweep up cellphone data.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/10/8-ways-federal-government-blocking-information/


100,000 Haitians to be Allowed into the US Without Visas by Obama 


With all the risks we are assuming, and all the problems with illegal immigration, of course we would just INVITE a whole bunch more people into the US – without a visa, naturally.

Calling it “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority,” Senator Charles Grassley, ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, is criticizing an executive order issued by the president that would allow at least 100,000 Haitian nationals into the United States to be “reunited with their families.”

Washington Times:
“Which countries are next on President Obama’s list?” Mr. Grassley said. “Will there by medical screenings before entry? Will work permits be granted automatically? How will this affect American workers?”

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the branch of the Department of Homeland Security that handles immigration benefits cases, announced Friday the program to unite Haitians already living in the U.S. with family members abroad will ramp up in 2015.

At that time the State Department’s National Visa Center will begin notifying families who may be eligible to take part in the program. Those immigrants will allowed to apply for work permits while waiting for issuance of their permanent visas.
The agency said the program will expedite “safe, legal and orderly migration.”
A similar program that reunited Central American children with their parents had a fraud rate of about 70%.
Or how about NOT. Maybe we should DEPORT the people HERE and using all of our social welfare programs, free medical and food stamps, and reunite them in their home countries? That seems like a WAAAAAY better use of resources. Should Obama be able to use his power to make this happen? Should the administration be able to import 100,000 more PROBLEMS for America?
http://www.rightwingnews.com/top-news/100000-hatians-allowed-us-without-visas-obama/



US Ordering 34 Million Green Cards for Illegal Plan

By Greg Richter
With some lawmakers predicting a sweeping executive order on immigration from President Barack Obama after the Nov. 4 elections, one federal agency is already making plans to hire a vendor to crank out up to 34 million  blank green cards to accommodate an expected surge in immigrants in 2016.

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has published a 
draft solicitation for a contractor capable of producing 4 million cards a year for five years — and 9 million in the early stages — that would allow immigrants to live and work in the country, Breitbart reports.

One estimate suggests 34 million cards will be printed in total.

An official from the government agency told 
MailOnline on Monday a plan was developed "in case the president makes the move we think he will," even though the agency's Document Management Division isn't yet committing to buying the materials.

Another official cautioned the plan was only a "contingency" in case immigration reform legislation passes in Congress, 
stressing to MailOnline it wasn't in anticipation of an Obama executive order.

The president was 
rebuffed by Congress to enact immigration reform — which Republicans have decried as an "amnesty" for millions of illegal immigrants, including hundreds of thousands of unaccompanied minors who poured into the United States through the southern border with Mexico this summer – and has vowed to go it alone.

The executive action's timetable has since shifted to after the crucial midterm elections.
The latest draft solicitation "seems to indicate that the president is contemplating an enormous executive action that is even more expansive than the plan that Congress rejected in the 'Gang of Eight' bill," Jessica Vaughn, an immigration expert at the Center for Immigration Studies, told Breitbart.

The green cards – officially known as Permanent Residency Cards – and Employment Authorization Documentation cards are used for participants in Obama's controversial Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Known as "DREAMers," the program's participants came to the United States illegally as children.

A total of 862,000 people have been approved for such documentation by USCIS through June.

But according to the draft solicitation, "the guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. ... The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards."

On CNN's "Inside Politics" Monday, moderator John King said he unilateral executive action promised by Obama for after the midterm elections will kick off confrontation, not compromise, from Republicans driven by anger and frustration in their conservative grass-roots voter base.

"Well, if you believed perhaps there would be room and motivation for a deal after the 2014 midterms — think again," King said.

"I was so struck by conversations in Colorado, in Kansas and Iowa — just pure frustration; a belief among conservative Republicans that this problem is getting worse.

"What does that tell you? It tells you there is no prospect for any compromise legislation during the final two years of the Obama presidency," King said.

"If the president uses his executive power as promised, Republicans will be pushing the grass-roots for confrontation, not compromise. An issue we thought after 2014 Republicans would try to deal with, will be with us until 2016 and beyond."

There is little doubt that Obama is determined to take action.

"There appears to be little political space for House Speaker John Boehner and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, who could well be majority leader in January, to negotiate any deal that would be acceptable to Obama," CNN reports.

"When the president takes executive actions, as he promises to do after the election unless there is some legislative breakthrough, it is clear the conservative grass-roots will demand confrontation, leaving the issue front and center as we head into the 2016 presidential cycle."

Related Stories:
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/green-card-immigration-surge/2014/10/19/id/601688/#ixzz3GkBlGfCw 
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed?
 Vote Here Now!

Amenper: The Final Solution, Nigeria is Ebola free.
Nigeria's containment of Ebola is a "spectacular success story," said Rui Gama Vaz, WHO director for Nigeria
Some 9,000 people have been infected with Ebola, and about 8.999.5 have died, mostly in hard-hit Sierra Leone, Guinea and Liberia, with the number of cases expected to increase exponentially in the coming weeks.
Dr. Simon Marvel, one of the world's leading experts on viral hemorrhagic fevers, says that the final solution of Ebola in Nigeria should be an example for the world.
The last case was executed last night, now Nigeria is Ebola free.  Any new case will be disposed accordingly as soon as it is detected
We have being able to stop the spreading of the disease by human-to-human transmission of Ebola by permanently isolating the  persons that have tested positive for Ebola.
Ron Klain, Ebola Czar. recently appointed by President Obama, said that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are working on revisions to safety protocols. The new protocols will take into consideration the model of Nigeria.
Because of its success, Nigeria’s model could be included in the new protocol immediately in the United States.
He said if any other person test positive for Ebola, a plan is in place that includes the new protocols.
Klain said that it is imperative for the country, not to have any other case of Ebola before the Midterm elections.

Kick Them Out: 55 Florida Mayors Who Are Anti-Second Amendment And Pro-Bloomberg


If your mayor is on the list, inform them of your dissatisfaction or better yet, vote them out of office this up coming election.
As unlikely as it may seem to those of us who pay attention to Second Amendment issues, there may still be some Florida Mayors Against illegal Guns (MAIG) Mayors who have been mislead by lies fed to them by Bloomberg’s anti-gun group.
We have the emails sent to Florida Mayors from MAIG claiming that they support the Second Amendment, we even have emails from known anti-gun Police Chiefs and Sheriffs reassuring some mayors that MAIG is just “helping to target illegal guns, not legal gun owners”.
They may not have noticed that MAIG has opposed every pro-gun and pro-self-defense legislative initiative proposed in Florida and nationally since the group was founded.
Florida’s 55 Bloomberg MAIG Mayors
Mayor
City/County
email/Contact
Susan Gottlieb
Aventura
Jean Rosenfield
Bal Harbour
Robert Yaffe
Bay Harbor Islands
David Coviello
Biscayne Park
Jerry Taylor
Boynton Beach
Rocky Randels
Cape Canaveral
Greg Ross
Cooper City
Jim Cason
Coral Gables
Walter B. Duke
Dania Beach
Judy Paul
Davie
Derrick L. Henry
Daytona Beach
Cary Glickstein
Delray Beach
Bruce Mount
Eatonville
Daisy Black
El Portal
Glenn Singer
Golden Beach
Samuel J. Ferreri
Greenacres
Charles Sanders
Greenwood
Samuel Henderson
Gulfport
Joy Cooper
Hallandale Beach
Peter Bober
Hollywood
Ken Schultz
Hypoluxo
Ted Blackburn
Islamorada
Marlene M. Wagner
Lake Hamilton
Patricia Gerard
Largo
QUIT MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
Barrington Russell
Lauderdale Lakes
Richard J. Kaplan
Lauderhill
Howard Schieferdecker
Maitland
Tomás Regalado
Miami
Philip Levine
Miami Beach
Oliver G. Gilbert
Miami Gardens
Wayne Slaton
Miami Lakes
Carlos Gimenez
Miami Dade County
Lori C. Moseley
Miramar
Connie Leon-Kreps
North Bay Village
Jack Brady
North Lauderdale
Lucie M. Tondreau
North Miami
QUIT MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
Douglas A. Gibson
Oak Hill
QUIT MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
John Adornato
Oakland Park
QUIT MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
Myra Taylor
Opa-Locka
Buddy Dyer
Orlando
Dominic Persampiere
Oviedo
QUIT MAIG to SUPPORT YOUR RIGHTS!
Colin Walkes
Pahokee
William Capote
Palm Bay
Shelley Stanczyk
Palmetto Bay
Frank C. Ortis
Pembroke Pines
Cindy Lerner
Pinecrest
Diane Veltri Bendekovic
Plantation
Thomas A. Masters
Riviera Beach
Philip K. Stoddard
South Miami
Rick Kriseman
St. Petersberg
Norman Edelcup
Sunny Isles Beach
Michael J. Ryan
Sunrise
Daniel Dietch
Surfside
John Marks
Tallahassee
Jeri Muoio
West Palm Beach
Eric H. Jones
West Park
Daniel J. Stermer
Weston
Dr Helen B. Miller
White Springs
Gary Resnick
Wilton Manors
Juan Otero
Zolfo Springs


Amenper: Hillary for President? Maybe yes, maybe not.
 Glenn Beck may not want to vote for Hillary Clinton, but he is convinced that she will win the presidency in 2016. Beck, the conservative radio and television host, used part of his radio show on Tuesday to talk about the prospect of Clinton running for president and why, if she does, she "will be the next president of the United States."
"She is going to win," Beck said, matter-of-factly, because Clinton will convince voters that she is the candidate that can take the United States back to "the golden years" of Bill Clinton's administration.
Yes, Hillary Clinton is running for president, and she is running away from President Barack Obama's record on foreign policy, she has drawn sharp distinctions between her view of America's role in the world and those of the President, while also expressing significant disagreements with him over the right approach to ongoing crises in the Middle East.
But with all the respect I have for Glenn, and with all the respect I have to the evil intelligence of Hillary, it bothers my mind to think that whoever the republican candidate is going to be, he will remain silent about who Hillary is and about her record.
From her days as first lady when she tried to socialize medicine, with a plan even worse than Obamacare, to her recent tenure as Secretary of State, Hillary has been not only a failure, but a disgrace for the country with the highest point of her career being the Benghazi catastrophe..
Hillary Clinton didn’t do much during her time in the U.S. Senate, relying on records collected by former Clinton adviser Dick Morris, the legislation Clinton passed during her first five years in the Senate had little substance. The vast majority of bills, according, were purely symbolic or would have passed without Clinton’s support
Morris tells us that even though she didn’t have much of a legislative impact in the Senate, Clinton did spend a lot of time befriending "moderate" Republicans like Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), who could potentially support her in a presidential campaign. (my question, will they dare?).Hillary Clinton is extremely ambitious, shortly after Bill Clinton graduated Yale Law School, Hillary was already telling colleagues that he was going to be president. Hillary private slogan for her and her husband was “eight years of Bill, eight years of Hill.”
At Wellesley College, Clinton wrote her senior thesis on Saul Alinsky,( the known Marxist) discussing Alinky's  community organizing tactics, but later found them to be “too idealistic and simplistic,” according to Bill Clinton’s biographer David Maraniss.
In other words Hillary was even more radical than Alinsky according to her biographer.

There are other  books and articles that show us the character of our "next president, here are quotes and incident in Hillary's life:

From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper,p. 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous taxpayer-funded health care plan) 
We just can't trust the American people to make those types of choices.... Government has to make those choices for people"
(From the book "I've Always Been A Yankee Fan" by Thomas D. Kuiper,p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)
"I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe"
(From the book "Inside" by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at Democrat lawyer
You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!" 
(From the book "American Evita" by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - Hillary to her State Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with "Good morning"
F**k off! It's enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every day, I'm not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn job and keep your mouth shut." 
(From the book "The First Partner" p. 259 - Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in case of an incident.) 
"If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over here and grab those bags!" 
(From the book "Inside The White House" by Ronald Kessler, p. 243 - Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally)
 "Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can't f**k her here!!"
 (From the book "The Truth About Hillary" by Edward Klein, p. 5 - Hillary shouting at a Secret Service officer) 
"Where's the miserable c*ck sucker?" 

This ill-tempered, violent, foul mouthed, hateful and abusive woman, this bitch wants to be our president and have total control as commander-in-chief of a military that her party so openly and proudly admit they detest. I can see someone like this gaining the respect of other nations, and especially from their leaders, who refuse to do as she tells them "por mis ovarios" ... or else.  
No thanks, our country deserves a better leader, not a dominatrix!
I don't think that the people could ignore this, I think that Glenn is kidding us, he is a kidder, and he is just scaring us to get us to go out and vote, and we will get out and vote, you bet, Glenn.
But it is also my believe that Hillary is not going to be the democratic candidate, and that is also a dangerous proposition, because.... who is going to be the other bitch?.


Uncle of Benghazi Victim: Will We Ever Learn?

President Obama and Hillary Clinton after his remarks during the ceremony at Joint Base Andrews, marking the return to the United States of the remains of J. Christopher Stevens, U.S. Ambassador to Libya; Sean Smith, Information Management Officer; and Security Personnel Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, who were killed in the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. (Photo: Pete Souza/White House/Sipa Press)
Michael Ingmire is a musician, writer and activist living in North Carolina. He is the uncle of Benghazi victim Sean Smith and has been an active voice in the pursuit of truth and accountability about Benghazi.
Most news accounts of the attack on Benghazi say it cost the lives of U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.
My nephew Sean Smith was one of those other Americans.
It’s been a frustrating two years since Sean died serving his country on Sept. 11, 2012. There have been countless news reports, multiple congressional investigations and more than one set of recommendations that either should’ve been followed before the attacks or that should be addressed going forward.
But when it comes to definitive answers on what happened, how and why my nephew died that night, and what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the future, we’re still waiting and wondering and hurting and asking.
Subscribe to updates and alerts
That’s why I made the journey from my home in North Carolina to the first hearing of the Benghazi Select Committee on Sept. 17.
It is important for me and my family to get to the truth and to honor the memory of my nephew, who was an information officer for the State Department.
As I sat in the hearing room in the U.S. Capitol, I considered the history of the moment. I thought back to similar hearings on Watergate and Iran-Contra. I believe Benghazi ranks with them on the list of the biggest cover-ups in American history.
The hot, white lights reminded me that sometimes the brightest light is needed to uncover the darkest truth.
The approach by the committee, particularly the bipartisan cooperation between the chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., and ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., gave me confidence this is a serious investigative body with little to none of the partisan grandstanding that marred earlier Benghazi hearings before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
A burnt building is seen at the United States consulate, one day after armed men stormed the compound and killed the U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others in Benghazi, Libya on September 12, 2012. (Photo: Tariq AL-hun/Newscom)
Then the hearing began. Its focus and the ramifications of what it covered horrified me both as an American citizen and a Benghazi victim family member.
The hearing dealt with the Benghazi Accountability Review Board report produced nearly a year earlier by Adm. Mike Mullen and Ambassador Thomas Pickering.
The witnesses were Gregory Starr, assistant secretary for diplomatic security at the State Department; Todd Keil, a member of the independent panel on best practices, and Mark Sullivan, chairman of the independent panel on best practices.
The history of Accountability Review Board reports—whether about Beirut, Kenya or Benghazi—shows the State Department accepts the conclusions, promises to do better, then does little to implement the substantive security recommendations.
A truly revelatory moment occurred when Gowdy quoted from an Accountability Review Board report: “We are disturbed at the inadequacy of resources to provide security against terrorist attacks. We are disturbed at the relative low priority accorded security concerns, and we praise the ambassador for seeking security enhancements before the attack.”
Patricia Smith, mother of American Sean Smith who was killed in the Benghazi attack, wipes away tears while testifying during the US House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on ‘Reviews of the Benghazi Attacks and Unanswered Questions’, on Capitol Hill September 10, 2013. (Photo: Michael Reynolds/Newscom)
Only that report was not about Benghazi. It was written in 1999 about the 1998 attack on the U.S. Embassy in Kenya. We should not be able to cut and paste key items of these reports; we should be learning what works and should be making adjustments. But we don’t.
We’re slow to even find out what went wrong. And when we do, and we realize this could’ve been prevented if we had acted on past recommendations, we’re even slower to hold people accountable.
There are some questions I have for the Benghazi Select Committee:
1. Why was Stevens sent to this dangerous part of the world on the anniversary of 9/11 without adequate security? Why didn’t then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton personally oversee the security guidelines or even review the risk assessment for this “diplomatic mission” facility?
2. For that matter, why has Secretary of State John Kerry still not appointed an undersecretary of diplomatic security, as has been recommended in previous Accountability Review Board reports? Will he be called to testify? Will Hillary Clinton or Leon Panetta?
3. Finally, what were we doing in Benghazi in the first place?
The most disturbing lessons about Benghazi are that the U.S. government has learned nothing, and the most important recommendations of the Benghazi panel, as well as previous Accountability Review Board reports, still have not been implemented.
Sean’s mother Pat and I do not want to see other Americans lose their lives like this.
We removed a fourth-tier dictator in Libya and armed Islamic rebels who turned around and killed American citizens. Once again, in the name of fighting ISIS, we are repeating similar mistakes, and our battle plans are being dictated by Islamic heads of state. Repetition of error is the true definition of insanity.

VA officials retire with benefits before they can be fired (Descarados o Inmorales???)

Posted on  by Cowboy Byte
“You can’t fire me – I’m retiring with full taxpayer-funded benefits!” appears to be the battle cry among the very few high officials held accountable for failure or corruption during the Obama years.
First we had IRS scandal kingpin Lois Lerner riding off into the sunset, her saddlebags stuffed full of lavish pension and benefit money (although, as she hastened to point out during a laughable effort to cadge some public sympathy with a softball interview, not enough to keep her in the style to which she has become accustomed.) Now the Wall Street Journal reports that VA officials caught up in the secret death-list scandal are pulling the rip cords on their golden parachutes, and the Administration is letting them get away with it. Try to contain your shock.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34197/va-officials-retire-benefits-can-fired/


Amenper: Racismo
 Cerca de 400 personas estaban parados detrás de barricadas coreando "Vergüenza en el Met!" y portando carteles diciendo "El Met glorifica el terrorismo" antes de la primera actuación programada de "La muerte de Klinghoffer".
La ópera se basa en el asesinato de 1985 del pasajero paralítico Leon Klinghoffer en el Achille Lauro, un barco de crucero italiano secuestrado por cuatro miembros del frente de Liberación Palestina.
El ‘anciano” de 69 años de edad fue tirado en su silla de ruedas y empujado por la borda en alta mar.  El compositor John Adams según he leído del libreto de la ópera, realmente justifica el hecho, no sé si lo hace por convicciones políticas o por ganar notoriedad.
Pero el punto no es el crimen que no tiene justificación, ya sea de un judío o un chino en una silla de ruedas.
El punto tampoco es defender a los judíos, ellos saben defenderse.
Y de eso se trata, a través de los años los judíos han tomado un poder que nadie se atrevía a hacer algo ni parecido a lo que ha hecho Abrams. Y hoy, el alcalde DeBlasio lo defiende. 
Esto trae una comparación de poderes, los nuevos recipientes del poder que tenían los judíos, son los negros y un poder salvaje y sin límites. 
Piensen por un momento que la ópera hubiera sido justificando a miembros del KKK colgando a un negro de una guácima, bueno en el sur no habían guácimas, pero de un sauce sureño-
Las protestas no hubieran sido tan civilizadas y el alcalde no se hubiera atrevido a defender al compositor.
Lo que hubiéramos visto es la destrucción de teatro de la Met. Hubiera ardido en llamas, y como es claro se hubieran justificados los actos de la turba. 
El ejemplo lo vemos en Ferguson, según avanza el juicio, vemos que el policía estaba justificado en matar al “niño” de 250 libras que le cayó arriba en el carro para quitarle la pistola.  Pero las protestas, los ataques violentos a los blancos, la muerte de un policía a manos de un negro “desconocido” aumentan cada vez más según aparecen las pruebas de las inocencias del oficial Wilson.
Pero toda la violencia pasa sin mayores críticas, todo es justificable porque mataron a un negro, no importa si el negro era culpable o no lo era.
Eso es el racismo que vemos en estos tiempos. En el pasado, hubo segregación, abusos, discriminación y crímenes contra los negros en el Sur, no se puede negar, pero eran otros negros, no los que vemos ahora y las condiciones de los negros hoy no es lo mismo que en los años 50s. 
Las protestas de hoy simplemente son un racismo a la inversa, un racismo contra un blanco sin darle la oportunidad de defenderse en el sistema legal de la nación, declarándolo culpable sin juicio.  Si el sistema judicial encuentra razones para absolverlo, entonces arderá Troya, y se justificarán los desmanes, y los culpables no serán juzgados.
Si esto no es una repetición de los tiempos de la segregación, cuando los blancos podían matar a un negro sin consecuencias, una repetición de los hechos, pero a la inversa, entonces lo que estamos viendo es esconder la realidad detrás de una corrección política.  Esto es la nueva discriminación, el nuevo apartheid, y el que no lo vea es porque no lo quiere ver.
Pero si vamos a justificar a los negros, tenemos que justificar a los palestinos, como hace Abrams.
Lo que dice el compositor es que la muerte de Kinghoffer era un resultado de la opresión de los palestinos por los judíos, y esto es lo mismo que nos dicen ahora, que los desmanes de los negros es el resultado de la discriminación de los negros por los blancos en ell pasado.
Pero no se puede juzgar un hecho presente por el pasado y mucho menos cuando los que cometen los delitos no vivieron en el pasado pero en el presente, ya sean negros o palestinos.

Amenper:  Extraterrestrials?
There’s a great deal of content, here and elsewhere, about UFO visits. No point in hashing that out in much detail. But let’s suppose, as a matter of brute fact, that we were able to verify with a high degree of certainty that an alien spacecraft flew the skies over Earth, and all we knew for certain about it was that it was extraterrestrial in origin. What would that tell us?
Well, we can assume to begin with that if the craft serves a purpose, it would probably be reasonably assumed that the entity that sent the craft didn’t want to hide it. We’ve already discovered technology that would allow us in principle to make aircraft invisible, and we can assume that any alien civilization capable of traveling to Earth would be similarly familiar with nanomaterials
The civilization sending them is trolling us—and maybe being a little cruel about it.
In other words: if any UFOs really are manned alien spacecraft, I think they’re probably full of obnoxious space beings that may be changed lo look like us, who want to live among us.  They may have been living among us for years; they could be holding public offices right now
Many will recall that on 1947, witnesses claim that an unidentified object with five aliens aboard crashed onto a sheep and cattle ranch just outside Roswell, New Mexico.
This is a well-known incident that many say has long been covered up by the U.S. Air Force and the federal government.
However, you may NOT know that more or less around nine months after that historic day, Albert Arnold Gore, and, Hillary Clinton, were born.
Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Eric Holder, Charles E. Schumer, and Barbara Boxer were born in dates coinciding with various UFO sightings.
There were also sightings of a UFO over the island of Cuba, in 1961, near a town called Sagua la Grande, where Ann Durham, the mother of President Obama was living at the time.
Does this have anything to do with our President birth?  Nobody knows, but anything is possible,
There are many cases of Aliens abducting and impregnating human women.
 The stories say that when the alien impregnate a woman, they say the woman is "carrying the future." They refer to the "children of the future." They talk about a "change" coming—a difficult change but an inevitable one. What we are seeing in the abduction phenomenon is apparently a process.  
The questions are, are these descendants of extraterrestrials. superior beings that they sent to control earth? or are they rejects that the alien civilization decided to send to earth as unwanted trash?
We don't know, but this piece of information has now cleared up a lot of things


What's wrong with obama and the firings???


This needs to be on the front page of every Newspaper in this nation!
Obama is setting us up for another pearl harbor!!!  

What is wrong with this  five first line US nuclear carriers docked together in one place. Just like Battleship Row, Pearl Harbor , December 7, 1941.
This picture was taken the February 2014 in Norfolk , Virginia … Obama ordered 5 nuclear carriers into harbor for "routine" (?) inspections. Heads of the Navy were flabbergasted by the directive but had to comply as it was a direct order from their Commander-in-Chief.

The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role leaving our land forces naked and exposed!

NORFOLK, VA. (February 8, 2014). This is the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were docked together. USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), USS Enterprise (CVN 65), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) are all in port at Naval Station Norfolk , Va. , the world’s largest naval station. 

Knowledgeable Sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces.
(U..S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released).

Obama is ‘Commander in chief’.
This ordering of most of the Navy's capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor !  This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, why did the following happen?  Is this a routine changing of the guard?  Or what?  Sounds more like a Purge!

Major General Paul Vallely (Ret):
This long list of senior military officers and one sergeant major
comes at no great surprise to me because of the direction this
country is heading.
Here is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:

Commanding Generals fired:
· General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012)
· Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013)
· Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013)
· Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013)
· Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011)
· Major General Charles MM. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013)
· General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013)
· Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point , NY (2013)
· Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013)
· General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013)
· Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico 's Security Battalion (Oct 2013)
· General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010)
· General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009)
· General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012)
· Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013)
· Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013)
· Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013)
· Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013)

Commanding Admirals fired:

· Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)
· Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2011)
· Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011)
· Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs , NY (Aug 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011)
· Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story , VA (Aug 2011)
· Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011)
· Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (Jun 2011)
· Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011)
· Commander Kevin Harms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham  
   Lincoln (Mar 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011)
· Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011)
· Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego 
  (Apr 2011)
· Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific 
  (Mar 2011)
· Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier
  Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)
· Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011)
· Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota , U.S. Navy Comander Naval Activitis Spain.   
   (April 1912)
 .Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station  
   Whidbey Island , WA (Apr 2011)
· Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011)
· Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011)
· Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011)
· Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island , WA (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville , TN (Jul 2011)
· Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011)
· Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011)
· Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011)
  Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012):
· Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012)
· Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012)
· Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012)
· Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012)
· Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station's Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic
  (Sep 2012)
· Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Captain Daniel Dusek-U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme
· Commander David Faught-Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012)
· Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012)
· Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012)
· Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012)
· Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012)
· Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Commander Dennis Klein- US. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012)
· Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (Jun 2012)
· Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012)
· Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012)
· Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL 
  (Nov 2012)
· Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012)
· Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxe

 Response Action Network Newsletter
Here is your weekly update on the politics and policies affecting our liberties. 

TWITTER SUES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Tech companies have complained about federal government demands for information on their customers and insistence that the companies tell no one about it (or else). Some, like Google, Apple and LinkedIn, have even tried to push back. The latest to do so: Twitter, which is taking the federal government to court saying its demands are a restriction in the company's First Amendment rights: 
"In the case of Twitter, their posts are public, they don't actually get that many requests that are related to national security, so they want to make that clear to users. In April, Twitter sent the government a draft copy of its July transparency report asking if it could be reviewed for publication. They were told they couldn't publish it. Twitter is saying this is what we call 'prior restraint,' it's a gag order under our First Amendment. Before we even speak, our First Amendment is violated. So they are asking now in court to be able to say more." 

Twitter's odds of winning in court are uncertain. Google and others who have sued the federal government ended up settling their cases out of court. The government still demands information from them, but the companies can give users a general idea of how many times the government has asked for information. 

In other words, it's a battle of inches, and there are still miles to go before Big Brother's prying eyes are closed.

 

 

Later Obama: Crowd Walks Out On Obama Mid-Speech

The crowd left before Obama was half way through his speech. Epic.
In an unusual break from rubbing shoulders with the rich and liberal at party fundraisers, Obama spoke at a campaign rally in western Maryland for the state’s lieutenant governor who’s gunning for the top seat in November.
But his audience left their own seats in droves – while the president was still speaking.
The most amazing part of the rejection at was the crowd’s makeup — overwhelmingly black – and Obama’s subject: encouraging heavy minority turnout for the midterm elections.
This is Obama country — Barack Obama Elementary School is just down the road, and close to 90 percent of votes cast here in the 2012 presidential election were for him, the best he did in any county in the state. The crowd was energetic in waiting for the president and in welcoming him to the stage, but once the president started speaking, the crowd began streaming out, a few at first, but then by the dozen once Obama was about 10 minutes into his talk.
This article continues on bizpacreview.com

UN NUEVO GENIO INVENTA COMO DESCUBRIR 3 TIPOS DE CANCER A EDADES TEMPRANAS.‏https://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gif

UN NUEVO GENIO INVENTA COMO DESCUBRIR 3 TIPOS DE CANCER A EDADES TEMPRANAS.

Clemente Sanchez.
                     EL NACIMIENTO DE UN GENIO
     Se llama Andraka, parece ser descendiente de Otomanos-Eslavos…
Un chico de 16 años inventó un sensor que detecta el cáncer en 5 minutos y en etapas tempranas Jack Andraka a los 13 años perdió a un ser querido  por cáncer de páncreas. Se puso a investigar y descubrió el sensor, que cuesta 3 centavos de dólar.
Los laboratorios se negaron a apoyarlo porque derriba a la millonaria industria del cáncer. Una universidad avalará su descubrimiento.
Jack Andraka: para muchos la esperanza. Para los laboratorios, el fin de un negocio.
Con tan sólo 16 años, un estudiante estadounidense de secundaria inventó un sensor para detectar el cáncer en tan sólo cinco minutos. 
El descubrimiento puede cambiar la vida de muchísimas personas, pero también es una amenaza para la industria farmacéutica, que recauda millones por esta dolorosa enfermedad. 
Todo comenzó con la pérdida de un ser querido cuando Jack Andraka tenía 13 años. Le dijeron que el cáncer de páncreas se detecta cuando ya no se puede tratar, lo que lo empujó a investigar sobre el cáncer a través de herramientas sencillas en Internet. 
Y tres años después, descubrió una manera "rápida, simple y efectiva" de detectar esta enfermedad mortal, que gracias a este invento, podrá neutralizarse. Con información que obtuvo de Google y Wikipedia, Jack estudió las 8 mil proteínas que se encuentran en la sangre, hasta entender que una de ellas, la mesotelina, se dispara en etapas tempranas, en las personas que enferman de cáncer de páncreas. 
"Detecta una de las miles de proteínas (la mesotelina) que hay en la sangre de los enfermos de cáncer. La mecánica fue utilizar anticuerpos y entretejerlos en una red de nanotubos de carbono, de modo que se obtiene un marcador que únicamente reacciona ante dicha proteína" explicó al presentarse en el Festival de las Mentes Brillantes. 
El invento es un sensor de papel, que cuesta 3 centavos, y que es capaz de detectar en cinco minutos tres tipos de cáncer: el de páncreas, el de ovario y el de pulmón. 
Pero lo más sorprendente de todo es que ha sido26 mil veces más barato siendo 168 veces más rápido. Además, este método es 400 veces más sensible que los actuales y no es invasivo. 
Pero su mejor punto a favor es que "se puede detectar el cáncer en las etapas más tempranas, cuando alguien tiene casi 100 por ciento de probabilidades de sobrevivir, y hasta el momento es más de 90 por ciento exacto para detectar el cáncer" dijo. "Y va a ser lo mismo para cáncer ovario y de pulmón" añadía "y cambiando el anticuerpo, este mismo invento puede utilizar una proteína diferente para detectar Alzheimer, otras formas de cáncer o VIH". 
Pero no fue nada fácil de conseguir. De 200 solicitudes que envió a laboratorios, todos se negaron a continuar con sus investigaciones, excepto uno. Finalmente logró que la Universidad Johns Hopkinsayudará a su desarrollo. 
Es un descubrimiento que podría afectar a la millonaria industria del cáncer. 
Su invento está en etapa de tramitación de patentes, algo que puede demorar varios años, pero el día que se apruebe puede resultar toda una revolución para la ciencia médica.
Además, durante la conferencia, el joven apuntó que la ciencia no debería ser un lujo, y que debería ser un derecho humano fundamental, "el derecho de acceso a la información debe ser de todos, no sólo de los que pueden pagar" afirmó. 

Un descubrimiento que le ha llevado a ganar el premio Gordon E. Moorede la Feria Internacional de Ciencia e Ingeniería de Intel y el Premio Smithsoniano al Ingenio Estadounidense y es el orador más joven de la Real Sociedad de Medicina en Estados Unidos.
Sin duda más que merecido.


Executive Amnesty Begins

Laws mean nothing to liberals.
Despite no official action from the president ahead of the election, the Obama administration has quietly begun preparing to issue millions of work authorization permits, suggesting the implementation of a large-scale executive amnesty may have already begun.
Unnoticed until now, a draft solicitation for bids issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Oct. 6 says potential vendors must be capable of handling a “surge” scenario of 9 million id cards in one year “to support possible future immigration reform initiative requirements.”
The request for proposals says the agency will need a minimum of four million cards per year. In the “surge,” scenario in 2016, the agency would need an additional five million cards – more than double the baseline annual amount for a total of 9 million.
“The guaranteed minimum for each ordering period is 4,000,000 cards. The estimated maximum for the entire contract is 34,000,000 cards,” the document says.
The agency is buying the materials need to construct both Permanent Residency Cards (PRC), commonly known as green cards, as well as Employment Authorization Documentation (EAD) cards which have been used to implement President Obama’s “Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals” (DACA) program. The RFP does not specify how many of each type of card would be issued.



Alerta la oficina del Tasador de la Propiedad de estafa de identidad que están haciendo a los propietarios

October 21st, 2014

 Por medio de una carta que alegan le rebajarían los impuestos le piden sus datos personales

MIAMI 21 DE OCTUBRE DEL 2014, nhr.com—Las autoridades de Miami Dade están alertando sobre lo que parece ser una nueva estafa dirigida a los propietarios de viviendas.
De acuerdo con la oficina del Tasador de la propiedad de Miami Dade, ellos no han enviado ninguna carta pidiendo información personal financiera.
El Tasador Lázaro Solís ha emitido una advertencia sobre una carta que está siendo enviada a los propietarios y la cual está impresa con el logotipo de la oficina del Tasador de la propiedad y donde se le pide a los dueños de propiedades que envíen vía fax que clase de líneas de crédito tienen en sus préstamos hipotecarios, numero de cuentas de cheque, haciéndole ver que son elegibles para un descuento en sus impuestos.
“Para ofrecerle un mejor alivio en sus impuestos, nuestra oficina debe comprobar que usted tiene aun una línea de crédito en su hipoteca, si este es el caso, por favor envíe por fax a nuestra oficina una copia del monto de su última línea de crédito y copia del estado de cuenta, acompañado de una copia de un cheque cancelado de su cuenta corriente donde usted quisiera que le enviemos su reembolso de impuestos”, dice la carta.
Carta Tasador e1413853793528 Alerta la oficina del Tasador de la Propiedad de estafa de identidad que están haciendo a los propietariosSegún señala el Tasador Solís, su oficina ha recibido una cantidad de llamadas de propietarios dando cuenta de la carta, la cual utiliza todos los números telefónicos correctos de la oficina del Tasador público, aunque el número de fax es distinto.
Solís esta pidiéndole a los propietarios que notifiquen inmediatamente a las autoridades si reciben dicha carta.
Si alguien ya ha enviado la información al fax falso, debe ponerse en contacto con su banco para que tomen las medidas pertinentes en su cuenta bancaria.
Aunque la Unidad de crímenes económicos de la policía de Miami Dade ha sido reducida, aun pueden llamar al 305-994-1000 para realizar las denuncias.

Se distancia el alcalde Tomas Regalado de la famosa Torre SkyRise

October 20th, 2014

• El alcalde no está de acuerdo con subsidio que le dará el condado al urbanizador Jeff Berkowitz

MIAMI 20 DE OCTUBRE DE 2014, nhr.com—La posición del alcalde Tomas Regalado sobre el subsidio de $9 millones que pidió el urbanizador Jeff Berkowitz lo ha distanciado del proyecto SkyRise por el que hizo una intensa campaña durante varias semanas y por la que los votantes de Miami creyeron y votaron.
“Los contribuyentes ganan sin poner un centavo”,decía Regalado en su comercial, “y es que eso es lo que  Berkowitz negoció”, según nos dijo.
Regalado declaró el fin de semana que él no estaba enterado de que el urbanizador  Berkowitz estaba pidiendo subsidio al condado. Aunque el alcalde de Miami ha declarado que no cree que fue engañado por Berkowitz, el hecho es que tampoco le dijo que estaba pidiéndole al condado $9 millones de los mismos fondos que decía antes no necesitaría.
“No podemos continuar haciendo las cosas de manera diferente de lo que prometemos a la gente”, dijo el alcalde Regalado, añadiendo que “no se trata de los $9 millones, se trata de un asunto moral”.
Pero existe otro detalle en esta trama de los $9 millones del subsidio, y es que la administración de Miami Dade se lo habían ocultado al alcalde Miami, fue hace unas semanas que un funcionario de la administración lo contactó para solicitarle una carta, “le dije  claro a Jack Osterholt, que  no estaba de acuerdo con el subsidio”,señaló Regalado.
Osterholt confirmó esta versión de Regalado, “el se negó a enviar una carta de apoyo”, dijo el vice alcalde.
En el comercial instando a los votantes aprobar la construcción de la torre SkyRise, el alcalde Regalado decía,“Esto significa más renta y un pago por adelantado de $10 millones para la Ciudad de Miami”, pero ahora ha declarado que, “dar media vuelta y pedir $9 millones al Condado  aumentaría los impuestos a la propiedad, aunque sea unos centavos para el contribuyente promedio, pero  ese es el tipo de medida que contribuye a  que los votantes no sientan respecto por el gobierno”.
A pesar que Regalado pidió a los comisionados de Miami Dade que no aprobaran el subsidio a Berkowitz, los comisionados apoyaron la entrega de los 9 millones para la torre de observación SkyRise.



Clemente Sanchez: QUE ES LO MAS IMPORTANTE DE LA VIDA. https://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gifhttps://blu172.mail.live.com/ol/clear.gif

En cierta ocasión, durante una charla que di ante un grupo de abogados, me hicieron esta pregunta: ¿"Qué es lo mas importante que ha hecho en su vida?"

La respuesta me vino a la mente en el acto, pero no fue la que di, porque las circunstancias no eran las apropiadas. En mi calidad de abogado de la industria del espectáculo, sabía que los asistentes deseaban escuchar anécdotas sobre mi trabajo con las celebridades.

Lo más importante que he hecho en la vida, tuvo lugar el 8 de octubre de 1990.

Comencé el día jugando golf con un amigo mío al que no había visto en mucho tiempo. Entre jugada y jugada, conversamos acerca de lo que estaba pasando en la vida de cada cual. Me contó que su esposa y él acababan de tener un bebé.

Mientras jugábamos, llegó el padre de mi amigo, que consternado, le dijo que su bebe había dejado de respirar y lo habían llevado de urgencia al hospital.

En un instante, mi amigo subió al auto de su padre y se marchó. Por un momento me quedé donde estaba, sin acertar a moverme, pero luego traté de pensar qué debía hacer:

¿Seguir a mi amigo al hospital? Mi presencia allí, me dije, no iba a servir de nada, pues la criatura seguramente estaría al cuidado de médicos y enfermeras, y nada de lo que yo hiciera o dijera iba a cambiar las cosas.

¿Brindarle mi apoyo moral? Eso, quizás, pero tanto él como su esposa provenían de familias numerosas, sin duda estarían rodeados de parientes, que les ofrecerían consuelo y el apoyo necesario, pasara lo que pasara. Lo único que haría yo sería estorbar. Así, decidí reunirme con ellos e ir más tarde a ver a mi amigo.

Al poner en marcha el auto, me percaté que mi amigo había dejado su camioneta con las llaves puestas, estacionada junto a las canchas. Decidí pues, cerrar el auto e ir al hospital a entregarle las llaves.

Como supuse, la sala de espera estaba llena de familiares que trataban de consolarlos. Entré sin hacer ruido y me quedé junto a la puerta, tratando de decidir qué hacer. No tardó en presentarse un médico, que se acercó a la pareja y, en voz baja les comunicó que su bebé había fallecido.

Durante lo que pareció una eternidad, estuvieron abrazados, llorando, mientras todos los demás los rodeamos en medio del silencio y el dolor.

El médico les preguntó sí deseaban estar unos momentos con su hijo. Mi amigo y su esposa se pusieron de pie, y caminaron resignadamente hacia la puerta.

Al verme allí, en un rincón, la madre se acercó, me abrazó y comenzó a llorar. También mi amigo se refugió en mis brazos. "Gracias por estar aquí, me  dijo".

Durante el resto de la mañana, permanecí sentado en la sala de urgencias del hospital, viendo a mi amigo y a su esposa sostener en brazos a su bebé y despedirse de él.

Eso, es lo más importante que he hecho en mi vida. Aquella experiencia me dejó tres enseñanzas:

Primera:

Lo más importante que he hecho en la vida, ocurrió cuando no había absolutamente nada que yo pudiera hacer. Nada de lo que aprendí en la universidad, ni en los seis años que llevaba ejerciendo mi profesión, ni todo lo racional que fui para analizar mis alternativas, me sirvió en tales circunstancias.

A dos personas les sobrevino una desgracia, y yo era impotente para remediarla.

Lo único que pude hacer fue acompañarlos y esperar el desenlace.

Pero estar allí en esos momentos, en que alguien me necesitaba, era lo principal.

Segunda:

Estoy convencido, que lo más importante que he hecho en mi vida, estuvo a punto de no ocurrir, debido a las cosas que aprendí en la universidad, al concepto inculcado de ser racional, así como en mi vida profesional. Al aprender a pensar, casi me olvide de sentir.

Hoy, no tengo duda alguna que debí haber subido al coche sin titubear, y seguir a mi amigo al hospital.

Tercera:

Aprendí que la vida puede cambiar en un instante. Intelectualmente, todos sabemos esto, pero creemos que las desdichas les pasan a otros. Así pues, hacemos planes y concebimos nuestro futuro como algo tan real, que pareciera que va a ocurrir. Pero, al ubicarnos en el mañana, dejamos de advertir todos los presentes que pasan junto a nosotros, y olvidamos que perder el empleo, sufrir una enfermedad grave o un accidente, toparse con un conductor ebrio y miles de cosas más, pueden alterar ese futuro en un abrir y cerrar de ojos. En ocasiones, a uno le hace falta vivir una tragedia, para volver a poner las cosas en perspectiva. Desde aquel día, busqué un equilibrio entre el trabajo y la vida; aprendí que ningún empleo, por gratificante que sea, compensa perderse unas vacaciones, romper con la pareja o pasar un día festivo lejos de la familia.

Y aprendí que lo más importante en la vida, no es ganar dinero, ni ascender en la escala social, ni recibir honores... Lo más importante en la vida, es el tiempo que dedicamos a cultivar una amistad.



Sugerencia de Oscar Fraga sobre las próximas elecciones:
Las elecciones del próximo martes 4 de noviembre son de suma importancia para el futuro de nuestro gran país.  No debemos pensar como demócratas ni como republicanos, sino como americanos.  Tenemos que votar por candidatos que representen los mismos valores que hicieron a los Estados Unidos la gran nación que siempre fue. Tenemos que tener en mente que los ciudadanos son el gobierno, "We the People."  El presidente, los miembros del congreso y nuestros jueces son solo parte de ese gobierno y no una entidad que tiene el poder absoluto sobre cada uno de sus ciudadanos.
Es vital que cada uno de nosotros salgamos a votar ese día y que nos eduquemos acerca de cada uno de los candidatos.  Lo mismo digo sobre cada una de las enmiendas que aparecerán en la boleta. Lo importante es salir a votar.  

Los anuncios que estamos viendo en la televisión y oyendo en la radio dejan mucho que desear.  Atacan al oponente pero ellos mismos no nos dicen que piensan hacer si ellos son electos.  Mucho de estos anuncios están llenos de mentiras y de información totalmente errónea y mal intencionada.  
Por vivir en diferentes distritos, cada uno de nosotros tendremos candidatos y enmiendas diferentes.  También habrá casos en los cuales hay candidatos y enmiendas por lo que todos nosotros votaremos.  

Le sugiero que consideren a los siguientes candidatos y a las explicaciones que los acompañan en la mayoría de los casos.  También les sugiero que consideren como votar en las enmiendas y las explicaciones que las acompañan.  Pero cada uno de Uds. sabrá cómo quieren votar ese día.
1.  Para gobernador y vicegobernador: Rick Scott y Carlos López Cantera.  Rick Scott tomó las riendas del estado en un momento en que el desempleo estaba sumamente alto y miles de familias tenían sus propiedades en foreclosure.  Charlie Cris fue republicano, independiente y ahora demócrata.  Dice que va a subir el salario mínimo y ésto suena muy lindo, pero eso es una función del gobierno federal y no el de un estado.  Ninguno de los candidatos son santos pero hay veces que hay que elegir el menos de dos males.
2.  Para fiscal general:  Pam Bondi
3.  Para Funcionario Principal de Finanzas:  Jeff Atwater
4.  Para Comisionado de Agricultura:  Adam Putnam
5.  Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 23:  Joseph "Joe" Kaufman
6.  Representante ante el Congreso, Distrito 24:  Carlos Curbelo.  José "Joe" García es su oponente.  Esta en estos momentos siendo investigado por un caso federal y no olvidemos que el dice que "Communism works."
7.  Representante Estatal, Distrito 100:  Martin a. "Marty" Feigenbaum
8.  Representante Estatal, Distrito 103:  Manny Díaz, Jr.  No tiene nada que ver con el que fué alcalde de la Ciudad de Miami y terminó siendo millonario en pocos años.
9.  Representante Estatal, Distrito 105:  Carlos Trujillo
10. Representante Estatal, Distrito 110:  Jose Oliva
11. Representante Estatal, Distrito 111:  Votar por uno 
12. Representante Estatal, Distrito 112:  Daniel Díaz Leyva
13. Representante Estatal, Distrito 114:  Erik Fresen
14. Representante Estatal, Distrito 115:  Michael Bileca
15. Representante Estatal, Distrito 116:  Jose Felíx Díaz/Carmen Sotomayor
16. Representante Estatal, Distrito 118:  Frank Artiles
17. Representante Estatal, Distrito 119:  Jeanette M. Nuñez
18: Tasador de Inmuebles:  Pedro J. García.  El ha estudiado toda su vida para esa posición.  Gracias a el, nuestros impuestos a la propiedad bajaron cuando el estaba en ese cargo.  Su contrincante es Eddy Gonzalez, no luce una mala persona, pero no sabe mucho sobre la posición de tasador ya que por años fué un Representante Estatal.  
19. Enmienda #1-Water and Land Convervation-Conservación de Aguas y Tierras:  No.  (Suena bonito, sobre todo cuando dicen que no nos subiran nuestros impuestos.  Aqui es para que el gobierno sigan comprando tierras y más tierras y hacer más y más regulaciones.  ¿Sabian que apróximadamente el 80% de las tierras del estado de Nevada han sido compradas por el gobierno?  Todo en nombre del calentamiento global, etc.-  Esto se pica y se extiende!!!)  Tengan mucho cuidado porque el lobo viene vestido de obeja.
20. Enmienda #2-Marihuana:  No.  Ya el estado de la Florida tiene la ley Charlotte Webb firmada por el gobernador Rick Scott que permite la venta de la marihuna medicinal a personas que de verdad lo necesitan.  Lean lo que ha pasado en el estado de Colorado después que ellos votaron a favor.  Ahora la mayoria de los usuarios son jovenes entre los 20 y los 35 años.  Ya estan haciendo galleticas de marihuana y hasta un aceite de cocinar de marihuana.  La marihuana es adictiva, afecta al cerebro y es el primer paso al uso de drogas mas fuertes.  Suena muy bonito como no las quieren vender.
21.  Enmienda #3-Nombramiento Eventual para Ciertos Cargos Judiciales Vacantes:  No.  Esta perfecto de la manera que se hace.  No hace falta que cambien el proceso que esta en vigencia hoy en día.  Eso le daria un poder a los gobernadores de poner a sus amigos ya Uds. saben para que.
22.  Preguntas del Condado-Enmienda para permitir bibliotecas en parques:  No.  Ya tenemos suficientes bibliotecas y con las que tenemos ellos tienens problemas asi que como ahora ellos quieren bibliotecas en los parques.  Parece que le esta patinando el coco.
23.  Preguntas del Condado-  Eximir al Parque Regional de Fútbol de Miami-Dade del Articulo 7:  No.  Esto es un arma de doble filo.
24.  Preguntas del Condado-  Permitir terrenos para acampar y alojamientos/cabañas en el Parque de Matecumbe:  No.  Esto también esta dudoso.Ya tenemos bastantes lugares de alojamientos y para acampar.  Esto impactaria negativamente el medio ambiente de la zona.  ¿Quién sera el contratista y el dueño de esos alojamientos y lugares de acampar?  
25.  Enmienda para eximir del Articulo 7  la ampliación de la Universidad Internacional de la Florida en los predios de la Fería de la Juventud:  No.  FIU ya tiene bastante tierra.  Ya estan tomando tierras del otro lado de la Calle 8.  Tienen un Campo Universitario en el Norte que hay que decirle Ud.  Quiere tomar los mangos bajitos con el hecho de que le den esos terrenos.  En esos terrenos se llevan a caba muchas actividades para nuestra comunidad.  Pienso que lo mudarian para Homestead.  ¿Cuantas familias pueden ir a Homestead?  También FIU ha hecho muchas cosas en contra de los estudiantes.  Cursos lo dividen en dos sesiones para cobrar más, se quedan con parte del dinero de Florida Pre-paid,etc.  En fin, son un pulpo que lo quiren acaparar todo.  
26.  Imponer otro impuesto a la propiedad para cubrir el gasto de construir una Corte que reemplaze el edificio del Cielito Lindo:  No.  Ya no podemos con otro impuesto mas.  Si el edificio de la corte esta asi es porque el Condado la dejo ponerse asi.  ¿Dónde han estado los inspectores todos estos años?  Solo piensen lo que le pasaria a Uds. si pusieran algo fuera de codigo en su propiedad o no cortaran el pasto por un tiempo. . . Si, le iban a poner una tremenda multa.  Recuerden lo que paso con el impuesto al Jackson Hospital.  Ahora tenemos que pagar ese impuesto y el dinero que el hospital recibia del estado se lo han quitado y se los han dado a otros hospitales alrededor del estado.

27.  Juez del Condado, Grupo 19:  Frank Bocanegra
28.  ¿Se deberian retener en sus cargos los tres jueces del Tribunal de Apelaciones:  Thomas Logue, Barbara Lagoa, y Vance E. Salter?  (He tratado de encontrar información sobre ellos y la poca información que esta disponible dice que han desempeñado bien su cargo).  
Piensen en todos los puntos antes mencionados.  Recuerden, la decisión es suya.  Compartan cualquier información que piensen que es importante con sus familiares y amigos.  Pidanles que voten por cualquiera de los candidatos que ellos merecen que se merecen su voto, pero que voten.
Están son mis sugerencias para las próximas elecciones el martes 4 de noviembre del 2014.
Usted debe votar por quien usted desee. LRGM
Esta es Boleta electoral  del próximo Noviembre  Martes 4, 2014 en Miami Dade.
REPRESENTANTE ANTE EL CONGRESO, DISTRITO 23 Joseph Kaufman REP 10
REPRESENTANTE ANTE EL CONGRESO, DISTRITO 24 Carlos Curbelo REP 15
GOBERNADOR Y VICEGOBERNADOR Rick Scott REP 17 Carlos Lopez-Cantera
FISCAL GENERAL Pam Bondi REP 22
FUNCIONARIO PRINCIPAL DE FINANZAS Jeff Atwater REP 25
COMISIONADO DE AGRICULTURA Adam Putnam REP 27
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 100 Martin A. “Marty” Feigenbaum REP 30
STATE REPRESENTATIVE, DISTRICT 103 Manny Diaz, Jr. REP 33
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 105 Carlos Trujillo REP 35
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 110 Jose Oliva REP 40
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 112 Daniel Diaz Leyva REP 44
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 114 Erik Fresen REP 46
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 115  Michael Bileca REP 50
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 116  Jose Felix Diaz   REP 52    Carmen Sotomayor REP 54
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 118 Frank Artiles REP 56
REPRESENTANTE ESTATAL, DISTRITO 119 Jeanette M. Nuñez REP 58
TASADOR DE INMUEBLES Pedro J. Garcia 70 
No voten por Eddie González para tasador de inmuebles, porque es un aliado de Carlos Giménez para subirnos los impuestos.  
ENMIENDA CONSTITUCIONAL No. 2  (Mariguana)  VOTE      NO
ENMIENDA CONSTITUCIONAL ARTÍCULO X, SECCIÓN 29
Financiamiento de Proyectos del Tribunal  mediante la Emisión de Bonos de Obligación  General:  Hacer una nueva corte con dinero de los contribuyentes. Vote NO/.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
Lázaro R. González Miño
https://twitter.com/lazarorgonzale2
En mi opinión