No 994 “En mi opinión” Julio 9, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R
González Miño Editor
La fórmula para resolver toda esta falta de respeto de la
mayoría de los políticos, el relajo, el robo, el malgasto, el amiguismo, el
nepotismo y la burla a los ciudadanos no
es votando por un individuo que haya vivido profesionalmente chupándose el
dinero de los votantes como un vampiro.
Es escoger uno que use la política como instrumento para
defender los derechos de los ciudadanos y hacer la patria más grande y fuerte.
Lázaro R González Miño
Quintin
George: Algunas personas pueden mirar hacia el futuro!
HL
Mencken nacio en 1880 - murió 1956) fue un periodista, escritor satírico,
crítico y demócrata.
Mencken
escribió el editorial de abajo mientras trabajaba para el Baltimore Evening
Sun, que apareció en la edición de julio 26,1920.
"A medida que se perfecciona la
democracia, la oficina del presidente representa, cada vez más cerca, el alma
interior de las personas. En algún gran y glorioso día, la gente de civil de la
tierra alcanzarán el deseo de su corazón, al fin la Casa Blanca serán ocupados por un francamente
tonto, completamente idiota y narcisista. "- HL Mencken, 26 de
julio 1920
Así
estaba escrito, y así ha llegado a pasar ...
¿Es
esto verdad?
ALBANILES RECOJAN QUE SE ACABO LA MEZCLA
TODAVIA NO LO CREO
TODAVIA NO LO CREO
AMENPER:
El Perro Católico
A una viejita se le murió el perrito, y fue a la
iglesia para hablar con el cura párroco.
Padre, le dijo, usted cree que podemos celebrar
una misa de difuntos para mi perrito que murió hoy.
El padre le dijo, mira, nosotros no celebramos
misa de difuntos para animales.
Quizás en la iglesia protestante que está en la
esquina hagan algo de eso,
¿Por qué no vas a verlos?
Está bien padre, dijo la viejita,
¿Usted cree que una donación de $10,000.00 por la
misa será suficiente para ellos?
El cura entonces dijo,
¡Un momento!
Usted no me había dicho que el perrito era
católico.
AMENPER: ¿Puede pasar esto?
LeRoy Jacksons, el dueño afroamericano de la
panadería “Delicias para hermanos negros” cerca de Marietta, Georgia, se
encontró en problemas legales por negarse a hornear un cake para dos clientes
miembros del KKK. "No es sólo contra mis convicciones de mi raza hacer
negocios con el KKK ", dijo Jackson, "pero no puedo hornear cake con
el tema del Ku Klux Klan adornado con la bandera Confederada.
Les dije firmemente, respetuosamente, que no
podía atenderlos, pero que deben de ser capaces de encontrar otra panadería en
la zona que fuera más receptiva a sus creencias.
Sin embargo, esa respuesta no fue lo
suficientemente buena para los simpatizantes de la confederación de la Guerra
Civil, Chester McElroy y Delmont Elkins.
"No puedo decirte cuan lastimados nos
sentimos. "Todo lo que queríamos era un pastel para celebrar el cumpleaños
del General Forrest que se celebra semana próxima y de hecho
rechazaron nuestra orden violando nuestros derechos, hay precedentes sobre
dulcerías a que se le han presentado demandas por no querer hornear cakes a
minorías.
¿Si unos gays pueden forzar un panadero cristiano
a hacer un cake para su boda, no hace esta medida automáticamente
que una panadería de negros deben de ser forzadas a hacer un cake para unos
supremacistas blancos de los caballeros del KKK?
Los miembros del Ku Klux Klan han presentado una
demanda ante el departamento de Justicia por violación a sus derechos humanos.
El fiscal del distrito no ha querido comentar
sobre la demanda.
Esta situación puede ser retórica, pero si
ocurren alguna vez estos escenarios ya hay desacuerdo sobre cómo deben ser
manejados. Así que, ¿qué significa esto para los partidarios de la ley de
libertad a los derechos gays?
“EMO” Pero esto si está ocurriendo en los Estados
Unidos de America cuna de los derechos y la igualdad. El meollo de este intríngulis
es que los negros y los maricones si lo pueden hacer y los blancos no. Asi de fácil
tenemos ahora una segregación racial y de preferencias sexuales por parte de
los negros y los maricones contra los blancos y las personas que prefieren
hacer sexo con personas de diferente sexo al de ellos. Así de fácil. LRGM.
Roberts: "Just who do we think we are?"
"The Majority's decision is an act of the will, not legal
judgement. The right it announces has no basis in the Constitution or
this Court's precedents."
Scalia: "A system of government that
makes the People subordinate to a committee of nine unelected lawyers does
not deserve to be called a democracy...Thus,
when the rights of persons are violated, the Constitution requires redress by
the courts."
Thomas:
"...to allow the policy question of
same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician,
highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more
fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without
representation."
Alito: "I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools." Five people should not be able to take away the votes of 50 million Americans.
The Motion for Rehearing could literally
protect the voters in nearly 40 states, our state constitutions, the institution
of marriage, and our Freedom of Speech and Religion. Think that is worth a call to
Attorney General DeWine? 800-282-0515
|
 |
|
|
|
In the 2000 Presidential election
between George W. Bush and Al Gore, I lived in a place called Broward County,
Florida. When they declared the state of Florida--and the election--for
Al Gore, I, like so many others, got down on my knees and asked for something
that had never been done. I asked for God to CHANGE
the outcome of the election.
You know what happened: He answered that "ridiculous" prayer. And if God can change the outcome of a presidential election, He can change the outcome of a Supreme Court ruling. This battle is NOT over! Call Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine now, and post this so your friends who care about marriage and our freedoms can be a part of reversing this illegal decision! |
DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION
Seven Of The Most Blatant
Lies In Hillary’s CNN Interview
Commentators, pundits and journalists the world over were quick to point out
that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s first television interview
since her April 12th presidential campaign announcement was full of misleading
statements and outright lies.
Here are seven of the most
questionable statements Clinton made in the 20-minute
interview with CNN’s Brianna
Keilar:
1. “People should and do trust me.”
“Would you vote for someone that you don’t trust?”
Keilar asked Clinton in a discussion of the polling numbers about voters
perception of her trustworthiness following the drama over her private email
server as secretary of state.
“Well, they – people should and do trust me,” Clinton
responded. “And I have every confidence that that will be the outcome of this
election.” (RELATED: Poll: Swing
State Voters Don’t Trust Hillary)
Fifty-three percent of American voters said Clinton is
not honest and trustworthy in a May Quinnipiac
poll. And in a May AP-GFK poll, nearly four in 10
Democrats and more than six in 10 Independents said “honest” is not the best
word to describe her.
The likeliest contributors: the thousands of headlines
generated from both her “home brew” civilian email server and from news of
the Clinton Foundation’s rolodex of foreign donors.
2. I’m subjected to a “constant barrage of attacks
that are largely fomented by and coming from the Right … “
Clinton blamed the email drama and resulting questions in the minds of voters
on a vast but baseless right-wing conspiracy. She admitted that Americans
should be thinking about those questions.
But she said they were only on the public’s
radar because she is subjected to a “constant barrage of attacks that are
largely fomented by and coming from the right.”
The New York Times broke the news in March that Clinton exclusively used a personal email account stored on a
private server to conduct government business as secretary of state, and since
then every major media outlet has followed the story.
3. “I only used one device.”
Clinton initially told reporters she set up the
private server for convenience, because she didn’t want to carry separate
devices for her work and her email. “People across the government knew that I
used one device,” she reiterated Tuesday. “Maybe it was because I am not the
most technically capable person and wanted to make it as easy as possible.”
But in an email to Sidney
Blumenthal while she was
secretary of state, Clinton mentioned she was without Blackberry coverage after
a tropical storm and so had switched to a “new iPad” for her emails.
4. “I’ve never had a subpoena.”
Asked why she deleted more than 30,000 emails while
under subpoena, Clinton said: “I’ve never had a subpoena.”
In response, the House Select Committee on Benghazi
released its March subpoena to Clinton Wednesday, which it sent directly after it became aware of
her personal email account and private server. The subpoena demanded she turn
over all records and emails in her possession related to Benghazi.
What she may have meant is that she wasn’t under
subpoena when she deleted the emails.
Prior to the subpoena, Clinton’s staff had voluntarily
turned over more than 30,000 emails to the State Department and deleted the
rest, which were deemed personal and irrelevant. The State Department then
provided 900 emails to the Select Committee on Benghazi.
5. “I wanted to go above and beyond what was expected
of me”
“Now I didn’t have to turn over anything,” Clinton
said, referring to the emails she turned over last year. “I chose to turn over
55,000 pages because I wanted to go above and beyond what was expected of me
because I knew the vast majority of everything that was official already was in
the State Department system.”
But new emails surfaced in June that had not been turned over to the Benghazi committee, suggesting
either that Clinton lied about turning all the remaining emails over to the
State Department, or that the State Department for some reason didn’t turn all
the relevant emails over to the Benghazi committee.
6. Republican presidential candidates are all “in the
same general area on immigration.”
Asked about Donald Trump’s comments on immigration,
Clinton tried to tie his remarks to the Republican party, saying they’re all
“in the same general area on immigration.”
“They don’t want to provide a path to citizenship,”
she said. “They range across a spectrum of being either grudgingly welcome or
hostile toward immigrants. And I’m going to talk about comprehensive
immigration reform.”
The Republican presidential candidates are in very
different places on immigraiton. Former Sen. Rick Santorum is expressly calling
for reduced legal immigration and rejects a path to
citizenship. Sen. Ted Cruz also rejects a path to citizenship.
But the comprehensive plan Sen. Marco Rubio is
outlining includes a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. And while
former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush has backed off a previous embrace of a pathway to
citizenship, but still advocates at least a path to permanent legal status.
Both want to dramatically expand legal immigration. (RELATED: Rubio
Doubles Down On Gang Of Eight Bill)
7. On raising taxes: “I’m going to be telling the
American people what I propose.”
Clinton dodged a direct question about tax increases,
saying she will tell the American people what she proposes in an upcoming
speech.
“Is raising taxes on the table?” Keilar asked.
“I’m going to put out my policies, and I’ll let other
people speak to their policies,” she said.
Hillary’s campaign announced her policy proposals will
include tax hikes in June. “We are rolling out major policy proposals over the
summer/fall,” her campaign spokesman
Brian Fallon tweeted. “Among those proposals will be revenue enhancements.”
Follow Rachel on Twitter
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/08/seven-of-the-most-blatant-lies-in-hillarys-cnn-interview/#ixzz3fOqupJ4U
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/08/seven-of-the-most-blatant-lies-in-hillarys-cnn-interview/#ixzz3fOqupJ4U
BREAKING: For The Second Time Today A Major
US Computer System Goes Down
First United Airlines
and now...
No one in an official
capacity is saying it yet — nobody in a position of knowledge and authority has
raised the possibility — but given that now two huge computer systems
in the United States have suffered major malfunctions in a matter of hours will
certainly have some people wondering whether hackers are at work…if cyber
attacks could be to blame.
USA
Today is reporting that all
trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has been suddenly and
mysteriously halted:
Advertisement
RELATED
STORIES
Technical issues are blamed for the systems on the
NYSE to shut down at 11:32 a.m. ET. Such outages are extremely rare in U.S.
markets…
Traders on the NYSE floor were standing around looking
at blank trading terminals where no bid or offers were being exchanged.
An expert in the
workings of the NYSE just told the Outnumbered show on Fox
News that, in his memory, nothing this drastic has ever occurred before at the
NYSE. Outnumbered is also saying that
the president has been briefed on the situation.
Advertisement
TRENDING
STORIES
CNBC also says it was an
apparent “technical issue” that caused all trading in all symbols to be halted
at around 11:30 a.m. ET:
The NYSE said all open orders would be canceled,
according to Reuters. The issues seemed to be limited to the NYSE floor, and
the exchange said it did not affect the NYSE Arca and NYSE Amex/Arca Options.
CNBC also reveals
that The Wall Street Journal website “experienced an apparent outage” as well.
Earlier on Wednesday, Western
Journalism told you how all
United Airlines flights were temporarily grounded because of a reported systems
malfunction.
CNN
Money tells us that flights
have resumed after schedules were severely disrupted for more than an hour, and
the ripples could be felt for days: “United issued a statement saying it
suffered from ‘a network connectivity issue this morning,’ and apologizing to
customers for any inconvenience. It said that 4,900 flights were impacted by
the problem worldwide.”
According to a report
from ABC News, the Department of Homeland Security has weighed in on the technical
issues that shut down the NYSE:
The Department of Homeland Security said there is no
evidence of a hack, saying evidence is pointing to some kind of hardware or
software issue.
ABC News also notes
that before trading was halted, the market was trending lower because of
investor worries about the deteriorating economy of China.
Western Journalism
will provide updates as they become available on these two major computer
problems plaguing a major U.S.-based airline as well as the New York Stock
Exchange.
Alert: Schools Are Implanting Dangerous Devices In
6th Grade Girls Without Telling Parents
Those pushing the
program, however, continue to sing its praises.
Concern
has been high for years among American parents who feel public schools are
inappropriately presenting graphic sexual material to students. Many
feel such subjects are best broached at home; however, more and more schools
are dismissing parental feedback.
Recent reports reveal how far the trend has gone in
more than a dozen Seattle-area middle and high schools. Intrauterine devices,
implanted contraceptives criticized by some for their potential health risks to
women and possible abortifacient properties, are reportedly being placed inside
girls as early as their sixth grade year – without parental notification.
RELATED
STORIES
CNS News
contacted a representative of Take Charge, a Medicaid program serving
Washington state, to learn more about the controversial program. The
spokesperson confirmed that “a student who does not want their parents to know
they are seeking reproductive health services is allowed to apply for Take
Charge using their own income, and if they are insured under their parents’
plan, the insurance would not be billed.”
This
program has been derided by many critics as a usurpation of parental rights.
“You need
parental okay [sic] to get your ears pierced,” one CNS News reader wrote, “but
not to get contraception. I’m ashamed to say that I grew up in the Seattle
School District. I guess parents don’t seem to count for anything, anymore, as far
as some are concerned.”
TRENDING
STORIES
Those
pushing the program, however, continue to sing its praises.
“Because
we’re at the school,” explained one health educator participating in the Take
Charge partnership, “which is so wonderful, we have access to the students, and
they have access to us, pretty much any time.”
CNS News’
Kathleen Brown summed up the situation in her article, saying kids “can’t get a
Coca-Cola or a candy bar at 13 Seattle public schools, but they can get a
taxpayer-funded intrauterine device … implanted without their parents’
consent.”
Should
schools facilitate the implantation of IUDs without parental consent? Share your thoughts in the
comments section below.
Ing.
Armando Lopez- Calleja **CARTA PUBLICA DE LOS CIUDADANOS DEL CONDADO MIAMI-DADE
Los vecinos de las ciudades del Condado Miami-Dade estamos
firmando esta carta, despues de ANALIZAR
EL ABSURDO AUMENTO DEL PEAJE EN LAS
AUTOPISTAS 836 Y 112, QUE PERMITEN EL TRANSITO A TRAVEZANDO
VARIAS CIUDADES DEL CONDADO MIAMI DADE, HACIA MIAMI BEACH.
En primer lugar se analizó el informe elaborado por el periodista
Ing. Armando Lopez- Calleja, el pasado 04 de Agosto del 2013, cuando comenzaron
los trabajos para construir
los nuevos “Puntos de Control” y los consecuentes aumento de las
tarifas del Peaje en ambas autopistas 836 y112.
En el cual se alertó a los gobiernos del Condado de Miami Dade, a
los gobiernos de de las ciudades de Miami y Miami Beach, asi como a parte de la
Prensa escrita, radial y de la television, mostrandole en dicho informe, las
enormes reacaudaciones entre los años 2010, 2011 y 6
meses del año 2012, con el siguente resultado; Recaudacion en los 2 y ½ años===$5’127.6
millones de dólares.
Gastos efectuados, ===========$3’902.3 millones de dólares.
Ganancias=================$1’225.3
millones de dólares.
Realmente nuestros empleados del gobierno, aparentemente no se
dieron por enterados, ni se inició una investigacion por el Poder Judicial,
para buscar transparencia en el trabajo realizado por la Comision MDX
responsable del control financiero, tanto para la
construction de las ampliaciones de las autopistas, de los nuevos
puntos de control, asi como del abusivos aumento del precio del peaje y por
ultimo de su operacion.
Con todo respeto, voy a transcribir unas lineas, del informe
respueta del Sr. Mario A. Diaz=Director de informacion Publica, en el 2013 a la
comisionada Rebeca Sosa, “En los proximos 5 años, MDX invertirá $836 millones
de dolares, solamente en la 836, que
permtirá encarar la congestion en …..”
Quiero aclararle al Sr. Mario, que en cualquiera de los años del
2010, 2011 y 2012 se inviertireon mas de $1.000 millones de dolares, entre las
autopistas 836 y 112, luego la cifra que usted indicó, que va a invertir en los
proximos 5 años, me parece que esta equivocada y aparentemente demuestra, que
sus explicaciones financiera dejan mucho que desear.
Como todos los que tienen que ver con este escandaloso abuso
economico, hacia el pueblo trabajador del Condado Miami Dade y de sus
ciudades, pues nos tomamos el trabajo de
analizar las recaudaciones entre el año 2008 y el 2013 y hemos sacado los
siguentes numeros, que demuestran lo abusrdo, abusivo, lo
irrresponsable e indolente del trabajo de esta “comision” y de los gobernantes
de cualquier nivel del gobierno, que han aprobado tan injusta y absurda
construccion innecesaria, que le ha costado a los
contribuyentes y que ademas le estan aumentando el precio del
peaje, por encima de las enomrmes ganancias obtenidas en en estos ultimos 6
años, con los precios del peaje y las instalaciones actuales, a pesar de haber
sido alertados como dije; en el informe del
4 de Agosto del 2013, no obstante
la maquinaria politica y juridical, permitieron que se continuara con esta torpe e innecesaria
construccion, sin que previamente se hiciera una
supervision economica, por el Poder Judicial, que clarificara los
manejos economicos de estas altas recaudaciones, sus gastos y conocer el
destino de las ganancias.
A continuacion los resultados economicos alcanzados, segun informe
del 4 de Diciembre del 2014, en los
“Puntos de Control” con los precios del peaje durante esos 6 años analizados y con las
instalaciones que existieron hasta el 2013.
Recaudacion total en los 6 años’==$9’644,049,170 dolares
Gastos efecutados ============$7’327,748,641 dolares
Ganancias. =================$2’316,300,529 dolares.
No obstante, les estamos adjuntando el escrito; “BOARD OF
DIRECTORES=MDX-13 members:. En el cual se detallan las Recaudaciones, los
Gastos y las Ganancias obtenidas
en en los años; 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 y 2013,
respectivamente..
Este escrito es el sentimiento de los electores y familiares de
las ciudades que respaldamos este informe, para demostrar, que estos nuevos
“Puntos de Control” y el consecuente aumento del precio del Peaje, es algo
innecesario, por demas injusto, como acabamos de demostrar en este, nuestro
mensaje solidario con los electores del
Condado de Miami Dade y de todas los empleados de las oficinas e instituciones
que trabajamos fuera de este Condado y que
transitamos a diario por la 836 y la112.
Si consideramos solo 700,000 viajes diarios, como dice el Sr.
Mario M Díaz. El incremento de la recaudación, con los nuevos “talls” y el
aumento del precio del Peaje, solo en el
2014 seria de $1,584’100,000 dólares, aunque el número de viajes diarios que
se maneja, es de un millón de viajes, resultando una recaudacion
de $2,232’000,000 dólares adicional a la recaudación que se recaudaba
originalmente cada año, con las instalciones
y el precio del Peaje. Estas nuevos puntos de control y el aumento del precio
del peaje, la recaudación llegaría cada año, hasta unos $3,400’.0 millones de dólares.
POR LO TANTO; EXHORTAMOS A
LA PRENSA ESCRITA, RADIAL Y TELEVISIBA A QUE RESPLDEN POR SUS MEDIOS, LA
INMEDIATA CANCELACION DEL COBRO DEL PEAJE EN LAS NUEVOS PUNTOS DE CONTRO Y QUE
EL PRECIO DEL PEAJE REGRESE A LOS QUE PAGAMOS ANTES DE QUE SURGIERA ESTE
ATROPELLO ECONOMICO EN CONTRA DEL PUEBLO TRABAJADOR Y DE TODOS LOS QUE
TRANSITAN POR ESTAS VIAS.
Ing. Armando Lopez- Calleja
|
We the People /
Take action / FORWARD
|
 |
|
Here is the ultimate solution to save
the United States: Impeachment
The Constitutional
Accountability Coalition of Tennessee (CACT)
in connection with the North
American Law Center (NALC).
Read the actual Articles of Impeachment
written by the NALC, the readable, formal, legal document that lists the
specific charges:
See the Impeach Obama Implementation
Plan developed by the CACT, ready to be extended to all 50 states: www.cactn.weebly.com
Actions:
2. Look for the chapter for your state on Facebook--or create one.
See the growing list here: http://cactn.weebly.com/state-chapters.html
3. Listen and ask questions. Next conference call:
Monday, July 13,
2015, 7:30pm CENTRAL
TIME/8:30pm EASTERN TIME.
Our group
of Americans have tried now for months to have a strong leader in our House of
Representatives file for Impeachment proceedings against one fraud, Barack
Hussein Obama. Our group of Americans are not affiliated with any single
political party or political group and are working completely free from any
salaries or compensation for our work.
We have
decided that the most important voice was the voice of the people and that a
combined voice of the good people of the United States could rally some leader
from the House of Representatives to overlook the coercion and the pressure
from their party to stand up for the citizens of the United States and file
Articles of Impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama on our behalf.
We
believe in the Constitution, we believe in the voice of Democracy and we
believe that the united voice of the good people of the United States cannot be
ignored any longer. Our sole purpose contained herein is to begin the
Impeachment process against Barack Hussein Obama.
We
must unite with the goal to save the USA.
Please
forward this information to others.
JIMMY
CARTER: FROM LUST IN HIS HEART TO GAY MARRIAGE
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
Though he admitted he doesn't have any supporting
Scripture, former President Jimmy Carter says he believes Jesus would approve
of gay marriage.
Appearing on HuffPost Live, Carter, an evangelical Christian, was asked by host Marc Lamont Hill whether Jesus would support same-sex marriage.
"I believe he would. I believe Jesus would," Carter answered, but admitted, "I don't have any verse in Scripture."
Appearing on HuffPost Live, Carter, an evangelical Christian, was asked by host Marc Lamont Hill whether Jesus would support same-sex marriage.
"I believe he would. I believe Jesus would," Carter answered, but admitted, "I don't have any verse in Scripture."
"No no no, just intuitively, yeah," Hill
chimed in.
Carter's opinion on same-sex marriage can be seen around the 15:30 mark of the HuffPost Live video.
"I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage, but I'm not … that's just my own personal belief," Carter said. "I think Jesus would approve of any love affair that was honest and sincere (for example,adultery, man on dog or goat, etc...), and was not damaging to anyone else. And I don't think that gay marriage damages anyone else."
Carter's opinion on same-sex marriage can be seen around the 15:30 mark of the HuffPost Live video.
"I believe that Jesus would approve of gay marriage, but I'm not … that's just my own personal belief," Carter said. "I think Jesus would approve of any love affair that was honest and sincere (for example,adultery, man on dog or goat, etc...), and was not damaging to anyone else. And I don't think that gay marriage damages anyone else."
Carter said he wouldn't be in favor of the government
forcing a local church to perform a same-sex marriage.
The only issue where his faith has conflicted with politics, he said, is on abortion.
"I have had a problem with abortion, and this has been a long-time problem of mine," he said. "I have a hard time believing that Jesus, for instance, would approve abortions unless it was in case of rape or incest or the mother's life was in danger."
Carter said that when he took the oath as president, he was bound to uphold the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision that abortion was legal.
The only issue where his faith has conflicted with politics, he said, is on abortion.
"I have had a problem with abortion, and this has been a long-time problem of mine," he said. "I have a hard time believing that Jesus, for instance, would approve abortions unless it was in case of rape or incest or the mother's life was in danger."
Carter said that when he took the oath as president, he was bound to uphold the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision that abortion was legal.
|
The Most Idiotic Comment in Presidential
History
Ben Shapiro | Jul 08, 2015
On Monday, President Obama
spoke about his new strategy to take on the terrorist entity Islamic State in
Iraq and Syria. In doing so, he explained that the battle against that
terrorist group -- a group he had once termed "JV" -- would amount to
a "generational struggle." Why would defeating a ragtag army of
primitives take generations? Because, Obama explained, "This is not simply
a military effort. Ideologies are not defeated by guns. They're defeated with
better ideas." To cap off this airsickness bag of gobbledygook, Obama then
concluded, "We will never be at war with Islam."
So let's get this
straight. A group Obama said he would degrade and destroy can only be degraded
and destroyed with ideas. Its own ideologies -- its animating force, according
to Obama -- have nothing to do with Islam. The cretinism here resembles a
perfect Jenga tower of fatuity: Remove one phrase, and the whole structure
tumbles
Americans should gawk
at the sheer wonder of Obama's applesauce here. Obama's bad acid trip bumper
sticker foreign policy -- "Better Ideas Beat Bad Ideologies" over a
Grateful Dead peace symbol -- reeks of third grade oral presentations. It takes
more than great ideas to beat ideologies -- it takes heavy weaponry. The
victims of the Holocaust didn't sit around thinking to themselves, "Golly,
if only we'd been able to come up with a better idea than Nazism, that Hitler
sure would have stopped all this nonsense." America didn't end World War
II by dropping informational leaflets. We dropped warning leaflets, then bombs.
Large ones. Atomic ones. No armed ideologues in history have been defeated
solely by better ideas -- at least not before decades of murder, repression and
evil.
So what did Obama
actually mean? It simply lacks credibility to read the president's comments at
face value: No sentient human being could be this dull. He meant that
ideologies aren't defeated by American guns, because American guns are backed
by American ideas. And American ideas are by nature bad, evil, racist,
xenophobic, homophobic, centophobic, and, presumably, arachnophobic. Sure,
American ideas backed with guns won World War II -- but hey, pretty much any
ideas backed with guns would have defeated Nazism, amirite? (Well, except for
the ideas of the British, the French, the Czechs, the Polish...)
When it comes to
fighting the ideology of ISIS, however, Obama finds Americanism insufficient,
since Americanism creates ISIS ideology through Islamophobia.
That's why Americans with guns can't defeat ISIS, says Obama: Americans with
guns create ISIS.
Only internationalism can win the day!
So far, that
internationalism has been a massive failure. Of course, internationalism is
always a massive failure, because it isn't an idea, any more than
"diplomacy" is an idea. Both are tools, to be used by those who
actually have something to say, something to fight for. But President Obama
despises traditional Americans who have something to say or fight for. They are
the problem. He is the cure. And he would rather disarm those Americans and their
rotten ideas than let them loose with guns against those who slaughter babies.
None of this should
be surprising from President Obama. He's been clear about his anti-Americanism
since "Dreams From My Father"; in that masterwork of falsely nuanced
detritus, Obama lambasted the "powerful" for their "dull
complacency and ... steady, unthinking application of force, of ... more
sophisticated military hardware."
Give Obama this: He
didn't lie to us. 66 million Americans blinded themselves to his ideology, proving
conclusively that bad ideologies are not always defeated by better ideas.
Sadly, Obama's own rotten-to-the-core ideology continues to win victories, and
the world continues to lose because of it.
Shocking New Study Reveals Just How Many
Muslims Support ISIS (And It’s Frightening)
This isn't the first time a study seemed to show that
Muslims agree with or lean toward Islamic extremism.
Yet another poll of “regular” Muslims seems to show
that a shockingly high number actually agree with Muslim extremism. This time,
a poll finds that a whopping 42 million support the creation of a worldwide
caliphate, an Islamic order that would outlaw all other religions.
Many non-Muslims console themselves with the
assumption that “most Muslims” don’t support extremism or terrorism. But nearly
every time a poll is taken, this notion that Muslims stand four square against
extremism is shot down.
Advertisement
RELATED
STORIES
According to Ryan Mauro of the Clarion Project, this new study should serve as a warning about
Muslim extremism. With these results, “ISIS is only a fraction of what it could
potentially become,” Mauro said.
“If we don’t act quickly, this is still going to
grow,” he continued, “and what we’re looking at today is going to look like the
good old days compared to the future.”
This isn’t the first time a study seemed to show that
Muslims agree with or lean toward Islamic extremism.
Advertisement
TRENDING
STORIES
A recent study of British Muslims found that fully a third felt that the British
government was at fault for the radicalization of young Muslims, not Islam, not
ISIS, and not al Qaeda.
Britain isn’t alone. A new study of U.S. Muslims conducted last month by the Center for Security Policy
found that a large number of American Muslims felt that sharia law was better
than the U.S. Constitution. They also felt that they should be allowed to
ignore the Constitution and instead be judged by “sharia courts” in America.
Not long ago, another poll by the Pew Research Center found that 88% of Muslims
in Egypt and 62% of Muslims in Pakistan favor the death penalty for people who
leave the Muslim religion.
The same poll found that honor killings were acceptable to many Muslims
and that putting adulterers to death was a perfectly sane punishment.
Finally, during the “draw Mohammad” controversy, not
to mention the murders of 12 staff members ofCharlie Hebdo magazine in Paris, large numbers of Muslims around the world agreed that freedom of speech should
be illegal and that any harsh words against Islam should be made a crime.
Who's The Next Greece?
New Research Report Explains Financial Fallout From Greek Chaos
By PAT BOONE, Legendary Entertainer
New Research Report Explains Financial Fallout From Greek Chaos
By PAT BOONE, Legendary Entertainer
Greece's "No!" vote means the Euro currency and Europe’s
entire economy may now slip into chaos - and drag us all down with them!
Capital controls were imposed last week to prevent bank runs from bankrupting
and destroying its financial institutions.
"A time bomb is ticking in heavily-indebted Greece. If it goes off
– with Greece repudiating its international debts and exiting the Euro currency
in a 'Grexit' - the damage could be severe worldwide," says THE GREEK SHOWDOWN, a new Research Paper by Craig R. Smith & Lowell
Ponte.
Greece has just reached the breaking point. A breaking
point the United States could soon reach as well. Our banks are already required
to report you to the government for making any unusual withdrawal and could
refuse to let you withdraw your account in cash.
Last year at the meeting of the G-20, the world’s ruling economic
powers, President Barack Obama agreed that this ominous new “bail-in” principle
would apply to the United States and other advanced nations.
Who will be the next Greece?
Will it be Portugal, Italy, Spain? Or will it be closer to home? Could
it be Puerto Rico, Illinois or New Jersey - who are all facing bankruptcy -
like Detroit?
Don't be left standing in a bank line for your money. This FREE Research
Paper will help you to put a sound financial strategy in place ahead of time!
|
|
|
|
Quintin
George: President
Obama brings a mouth to a knife fight
‘Ideologies are not defeated with guns; they’re
defeated by better ideas.”
Add that, along with “leading from behind” and
disappearing “red lines,” to the list of gems that will forever define
President Obama’s era in national security.
That line, from Obama’s televised Pentagon visit Monday on his administration’s anti-ISIS strategy,
quickly became a social-media meme.
Can we beat ISIS by presenting “a more attractive and
more compelling vision”? That’s how Obama put it while assessing progress in
our undeclared, undefined non-war against a nonstate that has nothing to do with
Islam (and yet kicks our ass all over the place).
Come on. This isn’t Debate Club.
ISIS is about mass executions, throat-slashing,
flesh-burning or pool-drowning in steel cages. They’re not into contests that
can be resolved in a West Side Story-type dance-off between the Jets and the
Sharks.
We can’t bring a mouth to a knife fight.
Nor should we. Even on acid, philosophy’s most ardent
relativists would find it difficult to put ISIS’s nihilist, fascist, murderous
and backward ideology on par with America’s vision of liberty.
In the real world, ISIS isn’t conquering vast
territories in Iraq, Syria, North Africa and South Asia by presenting a
compelling vision. The majority of residents in those occupied territories obey
ISIS only because their other option is a slashed throat.
When ISIS’s battle-crazed, testosterone-driven men
show up in Iraqi and Syrian towns, must our side win the hearts of the local
women and girls? No, because what they really need is someone to help them fend
off rapists.
True, there are a lot of Arabs, Westerners and others
who join ISIS or commit jihad in its name willingly. But they do so because
it’s a victorious movement on the march.
The way to counter that message is not by telling
those (mostly) young men and women that the West has better “ideas,” but by
dealing decisive military defeats to ISIS and expose its weakness.
Yet while Obama claims he’s ready to pull no punches
in the battle of ideas, he applies all kinds of brakes, limitations and “yes
buts” when it comes to the military battlefield.
Last week, US planes finally attacked Raqqa, Syria,
where ISIS headquarters are located. While a positive turn, it was far from
decisive. And unless sustained, it’s unlikely to make much of a dent in the
Islamists’ march across the Mideast and beyond.
But in his Pentagon address, Obama promised no major
changes. Instead, he spoke a lot about what we’re not going to do.
So no quick victories — or, as Obama put it, “This is
a long-term campaign.”
(Translation: Let the next president deal with it). No
Americans in combat roles — or, in Obama parlance, this battle is “the job of
local forces on the ground.”
(Translation: Let extremist Iran lead the fight
against extremist ISIS.)
And while defending America against would-be
ISIS-inspired attackers, the president would like you not to link them to
“real” Islam. (What kind of battle of ideas is it if our side is barred from
studying the Islamic passages that guide the enemy’s ideology?)
And most fundamentally, what evil ideologies can’t be
defeated militarily? What of the Nazis, the Japanese imperialists and the
rebelling Confederates, to name a few, which the US military beat almost
exclusively with blazing guns?
Yes, for more than half a century, America had engaged
in a seemingly-endless ideological contest with Communists.
But ultimately President Ronald Reagan, while
negotiating and engaging with Moscow, stopped “competing” ideologically.
Instead he called the Soviet Union an “evil empire” and built up our military,
acquiring ever-more and ever-better guns, showing the men in the Kremlin that
they’ll never compete militarily.
In other words, he won the Cold War with no limits on
the military and, well, forget about that battle of ideas.
Obama isn’t the first US president who shies away from
foreign wars. Sooner or later, as the menace from Islamists of all stripes
grows, America will be forced to join the battle. The longer we make up excuses
for not doing so, the more difficult that future battle will be.
En
español Google Traducido:
Consejo
Personal Una de Multi-Millonario Para Sobrevivir a la moneda Coming Collapse:
"Esto
es lo que estoy haciendo para proteger a mi familia y mis finanzas -
Te
recomiendo hacer lo mismo. "
Estimado
compañero americano,
¿Cree
usted que los problemas financieros de los Estados Unidos a partir de 2008 se
han fijado?
¿Crees
que tendremos otra crisis bancaria en los próximos años, o un problema con
nuestra moneda?
Si
usted está preocupado acerca de estas posibilidades, usted no está solo.
Después
de todo: Lo que estamos presenciando hoy en Estados Unidos no tiene
precedentes.
Nuestro
gobierno se ha embarcado en un experimento bruto fuera de control, la
ampliación de la oferta de dinero 400% en sólo seis años, y más del doble de
nuestra deuda nacional desde 2006.
Tomó
nuestra nación 216 años para acumular la primera $ 8,5 billón en deuda ...
entonces sólo 8 años más para duplicar esa cantidad.
Y
esta es precisamente la razón por tantas preguntas sobre la economía y nuestro
futuro se mantienen. Por ejemplo ...
¿Por
qué ha habido muy poco la inflación hasta el momento? ¿Cómo vamos a
posiblemente pagar todas estas deudas?
Y,
por supuesto, tal vez la pregunta más importante de todas: ¿Por qué no tiene
nada "malo" que pasó después de nuestro gobierno imprime más de $
4000 mil millones de nuevos dólares de la nada y pidió prestado $ 9400 mil
millones más?
Bueno,
como alguien que ha estado investigando de cerca esta situación desde hace
años, que ha construido un negocio de $ 100 millones para la capitalización de
experiencia en finanzas y contabilidad ... Yo estoy aquí para decir con 100% de
certeza:
Estados
Unidos está en para algunos cambios importantes en nuestra economía, nuestro
país y nuestro modo de vida en los próximos cinco años.
La
forma en que vive, trabajo, viajes, retírese, invertir ... todo va a cambiar.
Parte de ella en formas la mayoría de la gente nunca esperaría.
En
algún momento de los próximos años, vamos a experimentar una "nueva"
crisis de proporciones épicas.
Vamos
a tener una importante caída de la bolsa - y será peor que la que experimentamos
hace siete años.
Vamos
a tener una crisis monetaria también - porque los inversionistas y gobiernos de
todo el mundo se dará cuenta de que el dólar estadounidense no es el refugio
seguro que era antes.
Antes
de lo que mucha gente piensa, ya veremos el dólar perder su estatus de
"moneda de reserva", y esto hará que sea mucho más difícil para
nuestro gobierno a pedir dinero prestado, y tenemos nuestro ejército estacionado
en más de 150 países.
Como
mi amigo James Rickards (quien es un abogado financiero y consultor para el
gobierno de Estados Unidos) escribió en sus guerras libro Moneda:
"Si
la moneda se derrumba, todo lo demás va con él ... acciones, bonos,
commodities, derivados y demás inversiones están un precio en la moneda de una
nación. Si destruyes la moneda, se destruyen todos los mercados y de la
nación."
Vamos
a tener grandes cambios a nuestro sistema de jubilación y de la Seguridad
Social. Somos propensos a ver enormes aumentos de impuestos e incluso un
"impuesto sobre el patrimonio", que cobra una cuota en todos sus
ahorros y activos de valor.
Vamos
a ver todo tipo de nuevas leyes y normas sobre lo que puede hacer con su
dinero, al igual que la Cámara de Representantes proyecto de ley HR 2847, que
entró en vigor el 1 de julio de 2014. Esta ley hace que sea extremadamente
difícil, si no imposible , para el americano medio para conseguir un poco de su
dinero de dólares y en monedas más estables a través de los bancos extranjeros.
En los meses y años por venir vamos a ver más y más de estos "controles de
capital" colocados en nuestros ahorros personales ... que vamos a tener
una inflación masiva - cuando los billones y billones de dólares recién
impresos empiezan haciendo su camino en la economía.
También
vamos a testigos de cambios importantes en la estructura misma de nuestra
sociedad. Destruir el dinero de una naciones de este modo destruye negocios,
amistades y familias, que simplemente no entienden y no están preparados para
lo que va a suceder.
Créeme,
no me tomo estas predicciones ligeramente - y no tengo ningún interés en tratar
de asustar.
Simplemente
estoy siguiendo mi investigación hasta su conclusión lógica.
Yo
hice lo mismo cuando yo era uno de los primeros analistas para predecir con
precisión el colapso de los mayores bancos hipotecarios del mundo - Fannie Mae
y Freddie Mac.
Yo
hice lo mismo cuando yo cavé en las finanzas de GM y me di cuenta de este
otrora gran institución norteamericana pronto ir a la quiebra también. Yo hice
lo mismo Inmuebles Crecimiento General (el mayor propietario de la propiedad
comercial en América).
La
primera vez que presenté mi caso y expuesto los hechos acerca de estas
instituciones en conferencias económicas, la gente se enoja.
No
podían refutar mi investigación ... pero no estaban dispuestos a aceptar la
enormidad de las conclusiones tampoco.
Y
ahora, los mismos problemas financieros que he estado siguiendo de banco a
banco ... y de empresa a empresa en la última década han encontrado su camino en
el Tesoro de Estados Unidos.
La
siguiente fase de esta crisis va a poner en peligro nuestra propia forma de
vida.
Los
ahorros de millones serán eliminados. Este desastre cambiará su negocio y su
trabajo. Va a afectar dramáticamente su cuenta de ahorros, las inversiones y la
jubilación.
Se va
a cambiar todo acerca de su forma normal de vida: ¿Dónde usted las vacaciones
... donde usted envía a sus hijos o nietos a la escuela ... cómo y dónde usted
hace compras ... la manera de proteger a su familia y el hogar.
Mira
...
Sé
que mucha gente ve el mercado de valores se recuperó, el repunte de los precios
de bienes raíces, y quieren creer que todo es "volver a la
normalidad."
Pero
te prometo, nada es "normal" lo que está pasando en América hoy. Todo
es humo y espejos - el resultado de un experimento fuera de control
gubernamental con nuestra oferta de dinero.
Después
de todo, ¿cómo puede ser "normal" cuando ...
*
Aproximadamente el 75% de los estadounidenses están viviendo de cheque a
cheque, con esencialmente cero ahorros, según un estudio reciente realizado por
Bankrate.
* La
"tasa de actividad" (básicamente, el porcentaje de personas sin
discapacidad que realmente están trabajando) ha caído cada año desde 2007 y se
encuentra en su nivel más bajo desde la década de 1970. (Fuente: La Oficina de
Estadísticas Laborales de EE.UU.)
*
¿Cómo pueden las cosas ser realmente "normal" en Estados Unidos,
cuando el número de personas en cupones de alimentos se ha duplicado,
básicamente, desde que Barack Obama asumió el cargo ... y cuando la mitad de
todos los niños nacidos hoy estará en cupones de alimentos en algún momento de
su vida ?
Sí,
leyó usted bien: Aproximadamente el 50% de todos los niños nacidos en Estados
Unidos hoy estará en cupones de alimentos en algún momento de su vida. ¿Le
suena "normal" para usted?
*
Puede nuestro país realmente estar de vuelta a la "normalidad",
cuando, según las cifras más recientes de la Oficina del Censo, un increíble
49% de los estadounidenses están recibiendo beneficios de al menos un programa
de gobierno cada mes?
* O
cuando el 52% de todos los trabajadores estadounidenses ganan menos de 30.000
dólares al año?
*
Puede que las cosas sean realmente "normal" en Estados Unidos cuando
en un punto, un solo organismo controlado por el gobierno de Estados Unidos (la
Reserva Federal) estaba comprando hasta el 70% de los bonos emitidos por el
Tesoro de Estados Unidos - simplemente creando dinero de la nada ?
* O
cuando el "demasiado grandes para fracasar-bancos" que consiguió
rescatados en 2007 en realidad son 37% más grandes de lo que eran en aquel
entonces?
* ¿Y
cómo pueden las cosas ser normal cuando la oferta monetaria de nuestro país se
ha incrementado en un 400% desde 2006 - todos sólo impresa de la nada. Mira
este cuadro a continuación ... debe asustar a la mierda de ustedes ...
Esto
demuestra que lo que ha ocurrido en los últimos años con el dólar es algo
directamente de la Alemania de Weimar ... o los últimos 20 años en Zimbabwe.
http://files.stansberryresearch.com/images/Chart1.png
Como
he dicho, nadie puede decir cuándo exactamente la próxima crisis está por
venir. No yo ... nadie más. Pero te aseguro que lo que está pasando hoy en día
seguro que no es "normal".
Y
está garantizado para terminar en un desastre.
Es
por ello que recientemente he creado un Plan de 300 páginas, que detalla los
pasos exactos que estoy tomando para prepararse para esta crisis inevitable. Le
recomiendo a usted a tomar estos sencillos pasos también.
Liberal Trophy Girl Amy Schumer Forced To Apologize…
To Liberals
Liberals always need
something to complain about...
Liberals invariably
eat their own if they choose to not follow lockstep, and they are
doing that with Amy Schumer, who is the new “it girl” in comedy, movies,
whatever.
Listen, I’m not a Schumer fan from a comedic
standpoint. But professionally she deserves respect; and I certainly don’t
think she’s a bigot of any kind.
Advertisement
RELATED
STORIES
Yet, because liberals
always need something to complain about, there is “debate” on the left as to
whether or not she should get a pass from the outrage police. Some say that it’s ok that she
makes “racist” jokes because she’s a
feminist, while others attack the very notion that she is a feminist because there are
apparently rules and guidelines to follow. Then you have her “blind spot” on
race. A recent article from The Guardian states:
For such a keen observer of social norms and an
effective satirist of the ways gender is complicated by them, Schumer has a
shockingly large blind spot around race. Her lacklustre stint hosting the MTV
Movie awards (a rare misstep) featured lazy jokes about Latina women being “crazy”
that left Jennifer Lopez as unimpressed as the online commentariat. While a
much-lauded sketch from the show featured an ad for a training centre where old
people learn not to be racist, Schumer’s stand-up repeatedly delves into racial
territory tactlessly and with no apparent larger point. Her standup special
features jokes like “Nothing works 100% of the time, except Mexicans” and much
of her character’s dumb slut persona is predicated on the fact that the men she
sleeps with are people of colour. “I used to date Latino guys,” she says in an
older stand-up routine. “Now I prefer consensual.”
This led to her defending herself on Twitter, as well
as a defense from a guy who calls himself the “Dean of Comedy” on Twitter, even
though he’s not funny so much as a liberal activist. Still, it’s not enough for
liberals. A Washington Post article says:
Advertisement
TRENDING
STORIES
And there’s generally a common refrain in how these
jokes are justified: the individual telling them can’t possibly be capable of
racism because she’s dating or has dated men of color. The declaration serves
as both inoculation against charges of racism, or so the thinking goes, but
also as an assertion of agency, which is perhaps why Handler spent so much real
estate in her book “Uganda Be Kidding Me” discussing her black former boyfriend
“Tyrone” and how she relished her father’s obvious discomfort when she brought
him home.
Isn’t it easier just
to laugh?
The views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their
author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by
WesternJournalism.com.
Translate Google into English.
"EMO" Yesterday I send to you a proposition which I wish to
respond with Your opinions:
For 27 years I live in this county of Miami since I came from prisons in
Cuba without exception politicians: they have allegedly been elected to any
office, to solve the tremendous problems of misappropriation of public funds,
they have frustrated the aspirations most citizens. I can present thousands of
blatant examples: "The Marlins Stadium, the tunnel port, transport,
continuous and abusive nerve to the Highway Authority ghost of Miami, problems
with the police, steadily increasing taxes on anything, etc etc, etc. I think
we are the county pays more expensive gasoline. All politicians have
disappointed the hopes of the citizens.
All political WITHOUT EXCEPTION made fun of voters, no matter whether
they are commissioned, or whatever MAYORS HAVE ALL ABOUT RESULTS Vaquetas.
I WANT TO STOP THIS ease and CHANGE THINGS TO DO WHAT IS CITIZENS WANT.
We'll fix all that we have to fix, starting with "eliminating MXDX"
"The penny through PENELAS" and all the other crap that many have
been made.
I think I'm the best person I can be found to solve these problems. In
prison in Cuba I learned to fight even if not win, which here have the chance
to win.
I propose to elect me as Mayor of Miami in the 2016 elections.
Everyone knows I'm a person "conservative and respectful of those
who deserve it"
I offer to fix everything much as possible from my position as Mayor and
I promise that anyone gets in the task of making a more functional and honest
denounces county with evidence of their work against things better in Miami and
improve substantially.
The only way we can do that is if you contact their friends or
acquaintances and send the information I send them to you and in turn they also
send them to their friends. And they send me all your criteria to me to base
the work on what voters think are necessary fix first. That way we can
establish a communications network on what is what voters want solved and how.
It is time that voters are truly the ones to decide what the priorities
are. If the mayors and commissioners do not represent the needs of citizens
such politicians should not be the ones who make the decisions and squander our
money on junk that only benefits them.
For starters I can post a summary of all the things that have worked
more in the county and what is the way that you think should be done.
As many of you know, I am not a rich person, since I retired and I do
not have money to pay political campaign. So I think "If I receive
directly their opinion of what you wont here on my desire to run for
mayor"
Recolectare no money, I do not postulare on the ballot of candidates
(Because I do not have available the nearly thousand dollars you pay to be an
official candidate) I will be a candidate on the ballot blank. What is that? It
is a space provided on the ballot after all the names of the candidates in
which you can type the name of the person that you think should be elected
mayor. Although not an official candidate.
If I get from you a good response, quality and quantity as well start
from the campaign.
I ask that you send me a list of all the things you think are wrong and
send me a list of how you can solve all the disasters that we have in the
county.
Send me your opinion on my candidacy for Mayor in 2016 and suggestions
for solving the problems are many and difficult to solve, but together we can
do. Please send your comments and suggestions and this idea is not good the
number of people who do not participate will be the index I'm not the right
person to get out of this dunghill.
This is a very important task and we have over a year to do that we can
do.
I remember when we present the RECALL against Mayor Carlos Alvares, with
very few economic resources and we were short by 3,600 ballots to remove it in
an election. Then came Brahman and his super wallet and bag. But those who lit
the fuse to remove it was us. That is what we do to these manganzones we sit in
political positions to enrich themselves and to squeeze. And we can not afford.
A hug to all of you, good luck and God let us do what we want to make
things better for all, my best wishes to all.
Lázaro González Miño R lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com possible "if you
support me"
Mayor of Miami County.
Please send me your opinion on what you sent them in this appeal. Tell
me what you believe, to express their views freely. I need to know what you all
think about what I have expressed in this message.
Note: It says that if a friend took the rooster to the
fence, we will never know if he can win ... JMF.
Quintín George:
|
||||||||||
|
“EMO”
Ayer les envie una proposición que deseo me
respondan con su opinión:
Desde hace 27 años que vivo en este condado de Miami
desde que vine de las cárceles de Cuba y sin excepción los políticos que:
Supuestamente han sido electos para cualquier cargo, para resolver los
tremendos problemas de malversación de los fondos públicos, han frustrado las
aspiraciones de la mayoría los ciudadanos. Puedo presentar miles de ejemplos
descarados: “El Estadio de los Marlins,
El tunnel de puerto, El transporte, el descaro continuado y abusivo de la
fantasma Autoridad de Carreteras de Miami, Problemas con la policía, aumento
constante de impuestos en cualquier cosa, etc, etc, etc. Creo que somos el
condado que más cara paga la gasolina. TODOS LOS POLITICOS HAN DEFRAUDADO LAS
ESPERANZAS DE LOS CIUDADANOS.
TODOS LOS POLITICOS SIN EXCEPCIÓN SE HAN BURLADO DE
LOS VOTANTES, NO IMPORTA SI SON COMISIONADOS, ALCALDES O LO QUE SEA TODOS HAN
RESULTADOS UNOS VAQUETAS.
YO QUIERO DETENER ESTE DESPARPAJO Y CAMBIAR LAS
COSAS PARA QUE SE HAGA LO QUE DESEAN LOS CIUDADANOS. Vamos a arreglar todos lo
que debemos arreglar, empezando “eliminando al MXDX” “El medio centavo de
Pénelas” y a todas las otras muchas porquerías que se han hecho.
Yo creo que soy la persona mejor que se pueden
encontrar para resolver estos problemas. En la cárcel en Cuba aprendí a pelear
aunque fuera imposible ganar, cosa que aquí si tenemos la posibilidad de ganar.
Yo les propongo que me elijan como Alcalde del
Condado de Miami en las elecciones del 2016.
Todos saben que soy una persona “conservadora y respetuosa
de las personas que lo merecen”
Yo les ofrezco arreglar todo lo más que se pueda
desde mi posición como alcalde y le prometo que cualquier persona se interponga
en la tarea de hacer un condado más funcional y honesto lo denunciare con
pruebas de su trabajo en contra de que las cosas mejoren en Miami y que mejoren
sustancialmente.
De la única forma que podemos hacerlo es si ustedes
contactan a sus amigos o conocidos y le envían las informaciones que yo les
envíe a ustedes y a su vez ellos también se las envíen a sus amigos. Y todos me
envían sus criterios a mí para basar el trabajo sobre lo que consideran los
votantes que son necesarios arreglar primero. De esa forma podemos establecer
una red de comunicaciones sobre qué es lo que los votantes quieren resolver y
cómo.
Llego el momento en que sean verdaderos los votantes
los que decidan cuales son las prioridades. Si los Alcaldes y comisionados no representan
las necesidades de los ciudadanos esos políticos no deben ser los que tomen las
decisiones y despilfarren nuestro dinero en basura que solo los beneficia a
ellos.
Para empezar me pueden enviar un resumen de todas
las cosas que han funcionado más en el condado y cuál es la forma que ustedes
creen se deben hacer.
Como muchos de ustedes saben, no soy una persona
rica, ya me he retirado y no dispongo dinero para pagar campaña política. Por
lo tanto pienso “Si recibo directamente su opinión de lo que aquí le planteo,
sobre mi deseo de postularme para alcalde”
No recolectare dinero, No me postulare en la boleta
de candidatos (Porque no tengo disponible los casi mil pesos que hay que pagar
para ser un candidato oficial) Seré un candidato en la boleta en blanco. ¿Qué es eso? Es un
espacio que se deja en la boleta después de todos los nombre de los candidatos
en el cual usted puede escribir el nombre de la persona que usted considera
debe ser el alcalde electo. Aunque no sea un candidato oficial.
Si yo recibo de ustedes una buena respuesta, en
calidad y cantidad pues empezaremos desde ya la campaña.
Les pido que me envíen una relación de todas las
cosas que ustedes creen que están MAL y envíenme también una relación de cómo
se pueden resolver todos los desastres que tenemos en el condado.
Envíenme su opinión sobre mi postulación de Alcalde
para el 2016 y sus sugerencias para resolver los problemas que son muchos y muy
difíciles de resolver pero juntos lo podemos hacer. Por favor envíenme sus opiniones y sugerencias
y esta idea no es buena la cantidad de personas que no participen será el
índice que no soy la persona indicada para salir de este muladar.
Esta es una tarea muy importante y tenemos más de un
año para hacer que podamos hacerlo.
Me recuerdo de cuando presentamos el RECALL Contra
el Alcalde Carlos Alvares, con poquísimos recursos económicos y nos quedamos
cortos por 3600 boletas para sacarlo en una elección. Después vino Brahman y
con su super billetera y lo saco. Pero los que encendimos la mecha para sacarlo
fuimos nosotros. Eso se lo podemos hacer a estos manganzones que tenemos
sentados en las posiciones políticas para enriquecerse y exprimirnos. Y no lo
podemos permitir.
Un abrazo a todos ustedes, muy buena suerte y que
DIOS nos deje hacer lo que deseamos para que las cosas mejoren para todos, mis
mejores deseos a todos.
Alcalde del Condado Miami.
Por favor envíenme su opinión sobre lo que les envió
en esta exhortación. Díganme lo que crea, expresen su opinión libremente. Yo
necesito saber qué es lo que todos ustedes piensan sobre lo que les he
expresado en este mensaje.
Nota: Dice un amigo que si no llevamos el
gallo a la valla, no sabremos nunca si puede ganar… JMF.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment