No 1007 “En mi
opinión” Julio 25, 2015
“IN GOD WE
TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
LAZARO R GONZALEZ ALCALDE POR
MIAMI DADE
10,000 Patriots Deliver Obama a Message in Unison
|
In a show of
solidarity against a largely
unpopular Iranian nuclear deal, an estimated 10,000 protesters showed up at Times Square this week to
express their frustrations.
Western
Journalism has already shared a
remarks by a number of
prominent figures who have major problems
with the deal’s language, the
manner in which it was negotiated and approved, or both.
Among the
featured speakers at the event was former U.S. Rep. Allen West, who gave a
fiery speech that rallied conservatives nationwide. View his remarks
now by clicking on this link.
Until next time,
Chris Agee
WJ Managing Editor
The Extinction of Markets
Realities and Revelations
Photo by EPA
China's
four-week-long stock market rout wiped out nearly 30% off the Shanghai
Composite Index since its highs of June. To stem those losses the Chinese
government has formulated an interesting hypothesis: stocks won't go down if
you ban sell orders.
Working off
this proposition Beijing has ordered shareholders with more than a 5% interest
to stop selling shares; directors, supervisors, and senior management personnel
are also barred from reducing their holdings.
China has also
launched investigations on those it believes engaged in malicious short
selling. The threat of imprisonment has proved an effective deterrent to those
who may have been contemplating a short in the Chinese markets.
And even if
you don't fall into either of the above categories of sellers you still will
have trouble getting your money out of shares because two thirds of the stocks
on the exchange have been halted.
It should come
as no surprise that the Communist government of China has fallen off the free
market wagon. After all, the government is of the belief that economies grow by
building empty cities. So why shouldn't they think markets work best when not
allowing participants to sell?
The reaction
on Wall Street has been just as alarming. Deutsche Bank and Bank of America
Merrill Lynch have applauded the Chinese governments for doing everything
necessary to keep the bubble afloat.
But Wall
Street's counterintuitive and ironic bullishness on China is most evident in
the powerhouse investment firm Goldman Sachs. Goldman is urging investors to
buy stock in China right now!
In Observing
40 years of statistical history the Goldman team in China believes "...the
market is currently experiencing a standard bull market correction, not a
transition into a bear market." This is eerily reminiscent of the Wall
Street models that concluded housing prices could never go down on a national
basis.
First, I would
like to know how anyone could get forty years of honest and consistent data
from China. Then tell me where else in that forty year history of data did
China expand its debt by $20 trillion dollars in the space of just eight years,
as they have today?
Statistical
analysis such as this can offer a complement to fundamental analysis in making
market predictions. However, this assumes the exchanges where China trades
equities bears any resemblance to a market.
A market is a
place where a multitude of buyers and sellers freely meet and price is
discovered. What China has now created is a roach motel where money moves in
but it can't easily move out-if at all. Therefore, all technical and
fundamental analysis goes out the door. And those who choose to participate in
this charade are left waiting for Beijing's next decision on how to direct the
market move.
This is the
antithesis of capitalism and how free markets work. That's why it should be
shocking to see Wall Street, the supposed bastion of capitalism, embrace such
measures. But the sad truth is there are no free markets left in this world,
and it's becoming increasingly evident that most on Wall Street prefer it that
way. We have grown so accustomed to market manipulations that we have
completely lost sight of how the free market is supposed to function.
In this new
market dystopia stocks never go down, companies never fail and countries never
default on their debt--central banks just print all the problems away. And
where counterfeiting money and lowering interest rates doesn't solve the
problem, governments are trying to demonstrate that market regulations will
lead to success.
We can all
sleep well knowing that a small group of plutocrats who now control the global
economy will make everything turn out right. Genuine market analysis has been
supplanted by the need to parse the words of statements from central bankers
like students at a bible meeting.
And when you
really think about it, why bother analyzing their words anyway. Central bankers
don't understand how markets and economies work; all they have shown the
proclivity to do is print more money. So
we can all continue in our dystopian slumber.
But the
victory over command and control economies by free markets has been decided
long ago. However, these hard-fought lessons seem to have been too easily
forgotten. Even the Pope has joined on the Capitalist bashing band wagon.
Referring to it as ideological idolatry which leads to wage slavery, vast
communal dislocation, and commodity-market driven hunger. But perhaps he should
take a drive on the Pope mobile down the streets of Cuba or Venezuela to
witness the living standards of the poor that exist without the
"ideological idolatry" of Capitalism.
The truth is
there is no place where people live better than in a free market Capitalist
economy. And it is only when you stray from this model, as we have for the past
seven years, that you see the spread between the rich and poor blow out.
Freedom should
have vanquished Egalitarianism forever with the fall of the Soviet Union in
1991. But if those at Goldman still see the merit of investing in a tyrannical
command and control economy, perhaps North Korea is the next logical investment
to make. I am sure Kim Jong-un has a bridge to nowhere he would be happy to
sell them.
Nevertheless,
economic freedom and prosperity is rapidly being replaced by markets that are
driven by the edicts from autocrats, which is leading to the evisceration of
the middle class. People have willingly abandoned most of their freedoms. Why?
Because they have been dumbed down dramatically. How else could they have
handed over the markets, economies and, most importantly, the structure of the
family to governments with such ignorance and alacrity?
The abrogation
of markets leads to stagflation, economic collapse and chaos. Sadly, this is
the ultimate fate of the entire developed world.
Read more at http://affluentinvestor.com/2015/07/the-extinction-of-markets/#23OuFu9EAVD1O7Kc.99
Read more at http://affluentinvestor.com/2015/07/the-extinction-of-markets/#23OuFu9EAVD1O7Kc.99
DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION
Intelligence Expert Nails Reasons For
Investigation Into Hillary Emails
With news of the possible criminal
investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email use, one intelligence expert took to
Twitter to sum up the situation.
The
New York Times reports that two Inspector Generals have
called for a criminal probe into Hillary Clinton’s email use after news that
she used her private email instead of a secure government email to send and
receive classified information, which
would be illegal.There’s a lot of confusion surrounding Clinton’s emails and their significance, but Marc Ambinder, a journalist who literally wrote the book on classified intelligence, fired off a string of tweets worth reading.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/07/24/intelligence-expert-nails-reasons-for-investigation-into-hillary-emails/#ixzz3gvg6p2Sl
WND EXCLUSIVE
ARMS DEALER: OBAMA DOJ PROSECUTING ME TO
PROTECT HILLARY
Claims
administration covering up scheme to arm 'rebels'
Published: 3 days ago
NEW
YORK – Defense filings in the Department of Justice prosecution of arms dealer
Marc Turi allege the Obama administration is willing to prosecute an innocent
man to cover up the role former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton played
shipping weapons to Libya illegally in 2011.
A telephone
interview with Turi’s defense counsel, Jean-Jacques Cabou of the law firm
Perkins Coie LLP, led WND to an extensive review of the legal motions filed by
the government and the defense in the Turi criminal case.
Cabou
declined to answer specific questions WND posed, saying that rather than try
the case in the media, he preferred to allow the legal motions filed by the
defense to speak for themselves.
The
background of the Turi prosecution, while complicated, is at the heart of an allegation made by Fox
News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano in a recent syndicated column.
Napolitano charged Hillary Clinton, while secretary of state, lied when Sen.
Rand Paul, R-Ky., asked her in a Senate committee hearing if the State
Department had run guns illegally to Libyan rebels.
In the
column, Napolitano said an interview of Turi by Fox News intelligence
correspondent Catherine Herridge and Fox News senior executive producer Pamela
Browne led him to review emails to and from State Department and congressional
officials during the years when Clinton was secretary of state.
Napolitano
concluded it’s “beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainty” that
Hillary had conducted a “secret war” shipping arms to Libya illegally in 2011.
What
Napolitano assumed as true was the central argument advanced by the Obama
administration in the Turi prosecution: The weapons Turi shipped to Qatar were
intended not for the use of the Qatar Army but to be diverted to Libya for use
by the al-Qaida-affiliated militia attempting to overthrow Libyan dictator
Moammar Gadhafi.
But
Napolitano apparently missed the fact that if Turi is guilty as charged,
Clinton is arguably innocent of illegally shipping weapons to Libyan al-Qaida-affiliated
militia and of lying to Paul.
The
fact that remains indisputable in this complex controversy is that weapons and
ammunition in boxes marked “Qatar Army” were intercepted off the shore of Libya
in 2011. Video published July 6
by WND showed
Moussa Ibrahim, then Gadhafi’s information minister and official spokesman,
displaying to reporters a seized cache of weapons and ammunition clearly marked
as originating from the Qatar Army.
Court
motions filed by Turi defense attorney Jean-Jacques Cabou contend that should
Turi be acquitted, an elaborate plot will be exposed in which the Obama
administration set up Turi to take the blame if the illegal shipment of weapons
to Libya via Qatar in 2011 ever came to light.
The
central question then at the heart of the Turi criminal prosecution is whether
or not the Obama Department of Justice can prove Turi shipped the weapons to
Qatar in 2011, and if he did, whether he knew they were intended to be diverted
to Libya for the use of the al-Qaida-affiliated militia, in direct violation of
State and Treasury Department prohibitions.
The DOJ indictment
On Feb.
11, 2011, the Department of Justice charged Turi, individually and through his
company, Turi Defense Group, with attempting between February and July 2011 “to
broker a substantial quantity of weapons – machine guns, sniper rifles, assault
rifles, anti-tank rockets, rockets, and other high explosives and ammunition –
to individuals in Libya, with knowledge such activities were prohibited by
United States law enacted to protect the national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States.”
The
indictment charged that after the State Department denied Turi a brokering
license to supply weapons to Libya, he submitted brokering applications to the
State Department’s Directorate of Defense Trade Controls, “falsely listing
Qatar and United Arab Emirates as the end users for weapons that were actually
intended for individuals in Libya.”
This,
the indictment charged, was in direct contravention of U.N. Security Council
Resolution 170, passed Feb. 26, 2011. The resolution imposed an arms embargo on
all member states to prevent “the immediate prospect” of a Gadhafi-led attempt
“to slaughter rebel forces in Benghazi that would likely result in massive
civilian casualties.”
The indictment cited U.S. law, 22 C.F.R. § 29.5(d),
which specifies, “No brokering activities or brokering proposal may be carried
out with respect to countries which are subject to United Nations Security
Council arms embargoes.” It also cited features of the Arms Export Control Act,
Title 22, U.S. Code, Section 2778, allowing the State Department, in
concurrence with the Defense Department, to develop a list of weapons
prohibited to ship to Libya, many of which were found in the 2011 seizure.
The indictment listed a series of communications
between Turi, an Egyptian arms dealer residing in the United Kingdom identified
only by the initials “Y.A.” and an individual working from Cyprus identified as
“A.Y.” who was affiliated with a company importing and exporting Russian-origin
petroleum products. Both figures were named as the “primary intermediaries”
interceding between Turi and the Transitional National Council, TNC, in Libya,
to arrange for the arms.
The DOJ indictment charged Turi had “made a material
untrue statement and omitted a material fact required to be stated” when he
applied to ship weapons to Qatar and the UAE.
“Marc Turi and Turi Defense Group then knew the actual
intended end user” of the prohibited weapons being sent to Libya, the
indictment said.
Turi’s defense
In various court motions, defense attorney
Jean-Jacques Cabou asserted Turi shipped no weapons to Qatar.
Cabou strongly suggests the whole point of prosecuting
Turi was to blame him for the weapons transfer, which he called a covert Obama
administration gun-running operation that went wrong when Libya intercepted the
weapons.
He noted Gadhafi spokesman Ibrahim suggested publicly
that NATO countries were violating the U.N. resolution in an attempt to arm the
Libyan al-Qaida-affiliated militia – then designated by the U.S. and the U.N.
as “rebels” – in their attempt to oust Gadhafi.
In an initial motion to dismiss the case, filed July
23, 2014, Cabou noted that “in early 2011, while under contract with the
Government for work in those countries, Mr. Turi requested State Department
approval to conduct brokering discussions with allied entities and governments
in Africa, including the National Transition Council of Libya, the United Arab
Emirates, and Qatar.”
Cabou
pointed out that such requests “are common in Mr. Turi’s business and are
typically referred to as request for approval,” stressing that the outcome was
that the State Department approved Turi’s requests for approval in Qatar and
the UAE but turned down his request for Libya.
In bold
print, the next sentence of the motion made Cabou’s key point: “In the end,
however, no weapons were ever transferred pursuant to these requests. As is
often the case in international arms trade, these deals did not come to
fruition.”
Cabou
continued to note that later in 2011, the U.S. government began investigating
Turi for “still unknown reasons.”
“From
then until now, the Government has searched Mr. Turi’s home, seizing computers
and other electronic media, stopped him as he re-entered the country at Chicago
O’Hare International Airport, seizing even more computers, and flown agents
around the world to interview Mr. Turi’s associates in the brokering business
and the intelligence community,” Cabou’s motion said.
‘Hillary shipped the weapons, not Turi’
In a
motion filed Aug. 11, 2014, Cabou made clear his counter-claim that the
government was seeking to frame his client by allowing him to think the Obama
administration was in favor of a “plausible deniability” covert deal in which
the illicit weapons would be shipped to Qatar and packaged as “Qatar Army”
weapons manufactured outside the United States that were diverted to Libya
without State Department approval.
In another
sentence written in bold type for emphasis, the defense motion dated Aug. 11,
2014, stressed: “Public documents reveal that arms were in fact transshipped
through Qatar and the United Arab Emirates to Libya, and that the U.S.
Government may have provided support for those transactions.”
Cabou
then demanded the discovery of government documents or other evidence that
could prove the U.S. government had pursued a brokered-weapons deal through
Qatar that involved “nearly identical” transactions to those the DOJ was
accusing Turi of having executed.
In a
letter dated Aug. 6, 2014, addressed to the U.S. attorney’s office in Phoenix,
Cabou asked specifically for the following: “Any documents or other evidence
relating to instances in which the United States assisted or considered
assisting in any way, overtly or covertly, in the transportation, provision,
acquisition, transfer, or transport of Defense articles to or from any person,
entity, group of people, quasi-governmental entity, or government within the territory
of Libya, Syria, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey or Jordan (these
countries collectively here the ‘Covered Countries’) within the timeframe of
2010 to the date of the request.”
Cobou’s
letter to the U.S. attorney in Arizona detailed that for Libya, Qatar and the
UAE, “we have a good-faith basis to believe Defense Articles eventually did
covertly enter Libya from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates and that the
United States may have been involved.”
The
term “Defense Articles” was a legal term used by Cabou to refer to weapons
prohibited for transfer to Libya in 2011 under U.N. Security Council Resolution
170 and U.S. law that appears remarkably similar to the weapons display to the
international press in 2011.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/2251045/#foxyAcQBdqIjWM4o.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/2251045/#foxyAcQBdqIjWM4o.99
DOS ESCRITOS, DOS OPINIONES, UNA SOLA REALIDAD
|
 |
|
FUENTE INCANSABLE DE ÉTER
¿Y de quién procedían esos dólares?
¿Del hombre que respira debajo del agua
(gracias, Héctor Lavoe)?...
...De
la hiperimpresión de NUESTRA Hacienda y la hiperrehipotecación de NUESTRO banco central, del valor
de lo que creíamos los norteamericanos tener en la cartera. Razónde los precios por las nubes (900% desde 1945) y de
no tener Juan del Pueblo para el peaje.
A diferencia
de los de América Latina, el gobierno nuestro sale con la suya porque por ahí se cree que el dólar
norteamericano siempre valdrá para algo (libertades reconocidas, todas ellas, al ciudadano por la Declaración "Bill" de Derechos).
Parece
que del público estafado y robado solos Richie Blondet, mi jimagua y yo lo
sabemos. No que no se haya escrito sobre el tema.
Quien no se diere cuenta que demande al colegio (atención, clase política: cosa de hace 101 años, de los que el GOP tenía 48 en la Casa Blanca).
2015-07-24
17:26 GMT-04:00 juan molerio <juanmolerio@bellsouth.net>:
Fernando,
mi análisis es el siguiente:
- En Cuba siempre el pueblo ha estado durante 56 años, ayer mejor que hoy,
y hoy mejor que mañana.
- La URSS le regalaba todos los años a Cuba, 5,000 millones de dólares. ¿Que
hacia Cuba? invertía ese dinero en formentar guerrillas en África y América
Latina. ¿Con ese dinero mejoraba a su pueblo? ¡No! Prefería invertirlo en otras
cosas por una sola razón maquiavélica. "Si el pueblo tiene una forma de
vida normal, empezará a pensar en política". "Si el cubano se levanta
en la mañana pensando como buscar algo de comida para su familia, todo el
tiempo lo tendría ocupado y no pensaría en política".
- Al terminar la ayuda de la URSS, la obtuvo de Venezuela. Un país rico y sin
bloqueo. Tomando el ejemplo de Cuba, como está Venezuela ahora?
- Ahora que Venezuela está en quiebra y no la puede ayudar, por la
presión social y económica, ¡Sí podía haber cambios! El ejemplo lo tenemos con
África del Sur. Cuando se le aplicó un bloqueo real y verdadero, ¿Qué le pasó?
Cuando se hace real y no de mentirita, ¡funciona!
- Obama y su cuerpo de inteligencia se percataron de la situación, le dieron la
mano y le dio la espalda a la oposición. ¡ Es lógico para él!
El que
no se de cuenta, es porque "No hay peor ciego que el que no quiere
ver".
Molerio
DOS ESCRITOS, DOS OPINIONES, UNA SOLA REALIDAD
"No se puede caminar
contemplando las estrellas cuando se tiene una piedra en el zapato."
"Cuando el dinero
habla, la verdad calla."
Proverbios chinos
El Padre Eduardo M. Barrios nos
demuestra su fe religiosa, basada en el dogma católico que cree en
milagros. Escribe
de la población de Cuba como si fuera una entidad independiente que pudiera
tener la libertad de ejercer su voluntad para no necesitar las”remesas”
enviadas por sus familiares, no desear emigrar al extranjero para poder gozar
de mejor futuro, y/o tener “incentivo” para buscar trabajo, en un país
donde son esclavos y no trabajadores. También el buen Padre nos describe a
Cuba como independiente para actuar, ignorando que Cuba es solo un nombre de un
país que existió y que desde el año 1959 solo es una tierra cuyos únicos dueños
son los Castro, acompañados por sus más fieles seguidores. El Padre no menciona en su escrito al
castrato, que serian los únicos con poder suficiente para lograr reducir las
fuerzas armadas, no depender de potencias foráneas para subsistir, y convertir
su economía en una “pragmática”, donde pueda ser controlada por el
individuo. El “deshielo”
entre Cuba y los EEUU que luce el defender, no lograra, y ni siquiera
favorecerá el logro de los loables cambios que él desea. Por suerte en la misma edición de El
Nuevo Herald, el Sr. Guillermo I Martínez nos da una dosis de realidad en su
escrito “Cuento de hadas”. Es
obvio que Martínez no cree ni en “hadas”, ni en “milagros”. Explica con gran elocuencia y detalles
las razones del porque este nuevo “acercamiento” no hará diferencia en el bienestar del
pueblo. En el
caso de Cuba, el orden de los factores si altera el producto. Apoyar económicamente a los tiranos no
es el camino, alentar y
promover los deseos de independencia de la población, subversivamente si fuera
necesario, y fomentar el aislamiento económico solo disminuyéndolo a cambio de
un verdadero cambio en los derechos civiles del ciudadano y hacia un mercado
libre pudiera, con el tiempo, evitar la continuación de la
tiranía. “Tirarles
la toalla”, solo mantendrá en el poder a los Castro, sus militares y
herederos.
Fernando J. Milanés, MD
Breaking:
Hillary Could Soon Get Blindsided By A Criminal Investigation From An Unlikely
Source
The
emailgate scandal suddenly gets much more serious.
The
scandal surrounding emailgate — then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s use
of a private email account managed on a personal server — has just been
escalated to a higher level that could prove extremely damaging to Mrs.
Clinton’s hopes for the White House.
The New York Times reports that the Justice Department has been asked to
open “a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information
was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham
Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.”
Advertisement
RELATED
STORIES
And it’s
not a Republican politician or a conservative watchdog group that’s requesting
the criminal probe of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices. It’s two inspectors
general working for the federal government who have reportedly asked for the
inquiry into whether Hillary included classified information — sensitive
government secrets — in the emails she sent. Mrs. Clinton has denied that she
ever included any classified material in her many thousands of official emails
when she was the country’s top diplomat.
However,
as The Times article points out, when Mrs. Clinton turned over to the State
Department the digital communications she had held and controlled on her
private server, the review of those emails raised serious and troubling
questions.
In the
course of the email review, State Department officials determined that some
information in the messages should be retroactively classified. In the 3,000 pages
that were released, for example, portions of two dozen emails were redacted
because they were upgraded to “classified status.” But none of those were
marked as classified at the time Mrs. Clinton handled them.
TRENDING
STORIES
So now,
President Obama’s new Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, will have a huge say in
whether a criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s controversial email
practices will be undertaken. Such a criminal probe would almost
certainly further damage Mrs. Clinton’s already shaky image for being an
honest and trustworthy person.
Just a
couple of days ago, Western Journalism reported on a new poll from Quinnipiac that showed
Mrs. Clinton losing serious ground to potential Republican challengers in three
key swing states. The survey confirmed what other polls have found in recent
weeks — the frontrunner for the 2016 Democrat nomination for president is
not seen as particularly honest and trustworthy.
Mrs.
Clinton recently drew a fair share of snickers and snide comments when she
boasted to a CNNinterviewer,
“People should and do trust me.” Should Obama’s attorney general decide
that a criminal probe is warranted into Hillary’s emails and their possibly
classified content, even the presidential candidate herself would be
hard-pressed to make that statement again with a straight face.
Should a
criminal investigation be launched over Hillary Clinton’s controversial
email practices? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Cruz
Goes On Fox News, Drops This Incredible Truth Bomb On ‘Washington Cartel’ And
Trump
On this issue, he
pointed out, both he and Trump represent the field’s minority.
While some in the
Republican presidential primary field have trashed Donald Trump for his
controversial remarks on issues like immigration, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz explained
in a recent interview that he was observing
his party’s 11th commandment.
Often cited by Ronald
Reagan, Republicans obeying the rule agree to never “speak ill of any fellow
Republican.”
Advertisement
RELATED
STORIES
It is not only party
unity, Cruz told Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity Wednesday, that keeps him
from criticizing Trump.
“He’s a friend of
mine,” he said of the real estate tycoon. “He and I have sat down and visited
many, many times.”
As for the attention
– both positive and negative – his comments have received, Cruz chalked it up
to Trump’s willingness to address uncomfortable truths.
Advertisement
TRENDING
STORIES
“And he’s taking on
the Washington cartel,” he added.
Cruz went on to
charge that several others in the primary field are not so open to hearing a
conservative immigration message.
Trump has focused on
“illegal immigration and sanctuary cities” in recent speeches, Cruz explained,
adding that “a great many of the candidates in 2016 for the Republican
nomination have been vocal aggressive advocates of amnesty.”
On this issue, he
pointed out, both he and Trump represent the field’s minority.
“When we come to the
first debates in a couple of weeks,” he asserted, “I’m going to be one of the
very few major candidates on that stage who has never embraced amnesty.”
Instead of throwing
stones at a fellow GOP candidate, Cruz said he would prefer to focus on real
proposals to address our immigration problem, including his plan to strip
federal funding from sanctuary cities and impose a mandatory five-year minimum
sentence for anyone convicted of illegal re-entry into the U.S.
Is Trump right on
immigration? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.
BORN IN THE
USA?
CNN HOST ATTACKS SHERIFF JOE ON OBAMA BIRTH
CERTIFICATE
'Why would you risk your
credibility by getting involved in this nonsense?'
Published: 19 hours ago
CNN anchor Jake Tapper ripped into Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe
Arpaio Thursday, excoriating Arpaio for daring to call President Barack Obama’s
birth certificate a forgery.
On “The Lead,” Tapper said, “You’ve trafficked in this rather
preposterous notion that Obama was not born in the United States and that he
may have forged his birth certificate that he released.”
He continued, “Why would you risk your credibility on issues you care
about – like illegal immigration, like law enforcement – by getting involved in
this nonsense?”
“What do you mean ‘risk’?” Arpaio asked. “I’m the chief law enforcement
officer elected by the people. I have a right to investigate and speak out. I’m
not talking about where he came from. I don’t care where he came from. We’re
working on a fraudulent, forged government document. That’s what we are doing.”
Tapper interjected, “You’re maintaining that the birth certificate that
the president of the United States revealed and released to the public, you’re
maintaining that that is fraudulent?”
“That’s right,” Arpaio responded.
The CNN host asked, “Is there anyone, any credible law enforcement
person outside of you and your organization and your contractors, who has any
agreement with you on this?”
“No, they haven’t looked at it,” Arpaio said. “What are you kidding? I’m
probably the only law enforcement official who has looked into it. Nobody looks
into it. They shy away from it.”
Once again, a flustered Tapper interrupted: “Because the president was
born in Hawaii.”
“I don’t care where he was born,” Arpaio replied. “I’m talking about a
fraudulent government document, a birth certificate. That’s all I’m concerned
with. That’s a violation of the law.”
Tapper further questioned the sheriff, asking if he came to his
conclusion because “there are glitches in some of the printing.”
Sheriff Joe said he wouldn’t “get into all the technical details” at
that moment, but he added: “I’ve been around a long time. I’m not stupid enough
to even talk to you about it if I didn’t think there was a lot of smoke and
fire there.”
As WND reported on
July 5, Arpaio affirmed he is “pretty well convinced” Obama’s birth
certificate, as released by the White House in 2011, is a “fraudulent, fake
document.”
“I’ve been in law enforcement 55 years,” stated Arpaio. “I think I know
a fraudulent, fake document. I’m not a computer expert. I rely on my people.
But I’m pretty well convinced it’s a fake document.”
The sheriff was being
interviewed for “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New
York’s AM 970 The Answer and Philadelphia’s NewsTalk 990 AM.
Listen to “Aaron Klein
Radio” clip of Joe Arpaio discussing Obama’s birth certificate:
During the interview, Arpaio brought up the birth certificate.
Arpaio’s office has been investigating the birth certificate since 2011.
Arpaio’s statements prompted Klein to ask for an update on his team’s
investigation into the long-form birth certificate document, posted April 27,
2011 as a PDF file on the White House website.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/07/120722obamabirthcertificatez.jpg
Arpaio told Klein that “once again nobody wants to look at it right
now.”
“So it’s not my problem. I did my job.”
Obama’s qualification
for president as a “natural born citizen” has been challenged in court since
before he was first elected in 2008. The White House finally relented in 2011
and posted a birth certificate, but Arpaio’s investigative team concluded it is a
forgery.
Arpaio’s appointed
lead investigator on the birth-certificate case, Mike Zullo, has been promising
the release of
“universe-shattering” information regarding the document.
“When this information is finally exposed to the public, it will be
universe-shattering. This is beyond the pale of anything you can imagine,” he
told WND in a December 2013 interview.
Zullo has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth
certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had
been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from
a genuine paper document.
See some of Zullo’s
evidence:
Zullo has noted that Reed Hayes, a document examiner who has served as
expert witness for Seattle law firm Perkins Coie – the firm that flew an
attorney to Honolulu to personally deliver two paper copies of the birth
certificate to the White House – has concluded in a signed affidavit that the
document posted on the White House website is “entirely fabricated.”
The White House also has never verified the authenticity of a letter
purportedly sent by President Obama to the Kapi’olani Medical Center for Women
and Children in Honolulu in which he declares the center to be “the place of my
birth.”
image:
http://www.wnd.com/files/2014/08/obama-letter-600x728.jpg
A letter purportedly signed by Barack Obama indicating the president’s
claim he was born at the Kapiolani Center for Women and Children in Honolulu.
There also remains a
mystery as to why Obama is using a possibly fraudulent Connecticut-based
Social Security Number, when he and his parents never resided in the
Constitution State.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/07/cnn-host-attacks-sheriff-joe-on-obama-birth-certificate/#HWkH96LuvphcGcDm.99
Feels good to unmask an
incompetent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
"No
aceptamos donaciones de dinero"
"Solo
aceptamos su voto para poder sacar a
toda la
basura que nos desgobierna"
|
|
Briefly: both Trey Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC are coming under intense fire because they are standing up to the Hillary machine. I need your help now more then ever. That's why I hope you will set aside what you are doing right now and sign your pledge to show your support and stand with Trey Gowdy and Stop Hillary PAC. I really hope you will do this by midnight tonight. Here is what I'm asking you to do (it will only take a few moments):
Thank you for your attention to this important
email.
For America! Senator Ted Harvey P.S. Your signed petition and your donation will make a huge difference in this fight to defeat Hillary. SHE MUST BE STOPPED! From: ted@stophillarypac.org To: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com Subject: serious situation developing |
|
|
DAILY EVENTS FEATURED STORY
Why
Donald Trump Is Leading The Republican Field
Trump: Relationship 'Very Good' with
Hispanics
There is
a simple reason why Donald Trump is leading the race nationally amongst the
numerous Republicans vying for the nomination of their party. Voters are
despondent, and angry, and looking for somebody different.
Republicans
are mad that the Republican controlled Congress has produced nothing. They
recognize that the Republican leadership has been ineffectual. They see Donald
Trump fighting and fighting hard.
Same seems
to be true on the Democratic side where Hillary Clinton has been forced to
re-launch her campaign two times, because she is such a boring candidate who
does not say anything to excite rank and file Democratic voters.
Donald
Trump has tossed aside the Queensbury rules of combat for a political version
of a bloody MMA battle. This has caused chaos in the Republican field that will
hurt Gov. Jeb Bush more than any other candidate. As we get closer to debates,
it is clear that Trump will train his fire on Jeb and it is not going to be
pretty. Expect Jeb to have to tap out of this political fight when it becomes a
Trump versus Bush debate battle.
While
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is pulling huge crowds and showing that Clinton has
a glass jaw, Republicans leaders in Washington have done as much as they can to
help put Hillary, or another Democrat, into the White House.
Polls
indicate that since the Republican sweep to victory in 2014, President Obama’s
popularity is rising. That helps Hillary.
During
that time, Republican rage at leadership is also rising. A recentPew
Research Center study
found that “the Republican Party’s image has grown more negative over the first
half of this year. Currently, 32% have a favorable impression of the Republican
Party, while 60% have an unfavorable view. Favorable views of the GOP have
fallen nine percentage points since January.” This is because a Republican
controlled Congress has helped President Obama close out his second term with
some historic victories.
While
Republicans in the Capitol are floundering, Donald Trump has electrified the
polls with some harsh populist rhetoric against all things Washington, DC.
It has
not taken long for the establishment to fire back at The Donald. Rick Wilson
wrote a snarky piece in <href=”#ixzz3gf4SG0cz”>Politico where he argued
“greetings, Donald Trump super fans. I am a member of the GOP establishment.
I’m writing to tell you that, no matter how much you wish it otherwise, the
Donald Trump candidacy is almost over.” Wilson makes a weak case that somehow
support for Trump translates into support for Hillary, because Trump can’t win.
Not to be
outdone, Victor David Hanson at National
Review Online has an
equally ridiculous piece comparing Donald Trump to President Obama. “In his
current unbridled commentary and without worry over party politics, Obama has
perhaps gone the full Trump — though in the opposite fashion of tossing out
politically correct themes of the progressive Left, which lead to little
concrete action. So Obama is Trump’s doppelgänger. The two see the world in
similarly materialist — though, again, opposite — terms.”
John
Feehery at The
Hill went in
another direction by comparing Trump to Joe McCarthy. “McCarthy wasn’t wrong
about communist influence in the State Department or in Hollywood. There were
plenty of spies in both places, as records would later show. But his approach
to weed them out was paranoid, undisciplined and erratic. And when he decided
to take on the Army, he made a huge strategic mistake. Donald Trump reminds me
a bit of McCarthy.” I am sure a George Wallace or Adolph Hitler analogy is in
the establishment hip pocket for the next round of attacks.
Despite
the establishment attempt to bully voters, the latest Washington
Post/ABC News poll puts
Trump at the top with 24%. The numbers indicate that he has siphoned off Tea Party
support from Sens. Rand Paul (R-KY), Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Marco Rubio (R-FL).
Gov. Christie’s support was cut in half because he seems to be a less
conservative version of the outspoken New York/New Jersey guy. It looks like
New York is tougher than New Jersey in this battle of the tough talking
politicos.
Democrats
should not be so excited about Trump screwing up the Republican field, because
they have their own problem – Hillary Clinton. The latest Quinnipiac
poll indicates
that the coronation of Hillary may be on hold because she is losing in head to
head battles in the swing states of Colorado, Iowa and Virginia. Her
favorability ratings are bad and she is looking over her shoulder at Sen.
Sanders who is gaining fast.
Democrats
are not ripping Sanders, because they are in denial that Hillary is a terrible
candidate. They forget that she gave away the nomination in 2008 when she ran a
terrible campaign. Her strategy right now is to embrace the socialism-lite and
hope that the Sanders campaign peters out on its own.
The
American people are sick and tired of the lame establishment policies of both
parties. Hillary and Jeb’s attempt to retain control for our nations’ two royal
families – the Clintons and the Bushes – may be on hold. Get some popcorn and
enjoy the next few months while the voters of both parties root for the
underdog socialist and bombastic billionaire.
Trump and
Sanders may not win, but they sure will make it interesting. They also show
that the American public is ok with some non-traditional candidates who are
scrapping with two well-funded establishment elites.
Watch Trump
Dismiss This Liberal's Inane Question
·
Source: The Daily Caller
·
by: Al Weaver
GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump
batted down and dismissed questioning from MSNBC host Jose Diaz-Balart Thursday
during a press conference in Laredo, TX at the U.S./Mexico border.
Diaz-Balart began asking Trump about his comments from his kickoff announcement address, but soon into his question, the real estate mogul began railing against the media for taking his points out of context.
“Mr. Trump, you know 53,00o hispanics turn 18 years of age in this country every month, born in the country of voting age,” Diaz-Balart, also a host for Telemundo, told Trump. “54 million plus hispanics — many feel that what you said when you said that the people who cross the border are rapists and murderers –.”
“No, no, no. We’re talking about illegal immigration and everybody understands that,” Trump said. “And you know what: that’s a typical case — wait, that’s a typical case of the press with misinterpretation. They take a half a sentence — they take a half a sentence, then they take quarter of a sentence and put it all together. It’s a typical thing.” Source: The Daily Caller
Diaz-Balart began asking Trump about his comments from his kickoff announcement address, but soon into his question, the real estate mogul began railing against the media for taking his points out of context.
“Mr. Trump, you know 53,00o hispanics turn 18 years of age in this country every month, born in the country of voting age,” Diaz-Balart, also a host for Telemundo, told Trump. “54 million plus hispanics — many feel that what you said when you said that the people who cross the border are rapists and murderers –.”
“No, no, no. We’re talking about illegal immigration and everybody understands that,” Trump said. “And you know what: that’s a typical case — wait, that’s a typical case of the press with misinterpretation. They take a half a sentence — they take a half a sentence, then they take quarter of a sentence and put it all together. It’s a typical thing.” Source: The Daily Caller
- See more at:
http://americanactionnews.com/articles/donald-trump-shouts-down-msnbc-s-jose-diaz-balart-during-border-presser-video#sthash.BUA3iK7r.dpuf
Suspendida la pena de muerte sobre Asia Bibi
|
Además, considera que el fallo de la Corte de Apelaciones contiene irregularidades o fallos y abre expediente para estudiarlos.
¡¡¡Si se puede!!! Si participaste en esta campaña, Lazaro R, gracias y enhorabuena.
Te recuerdo la campaña:
http://www.citizengo.org/es/26915-asia-bibi-sera-juzgada-22-libertad-y-justicia
Es un paso muy importante, pero todavía no podemos cantar victoria. El Supremo de Pakistán todavía debe emitir su sentencia definitiva, que esperamos sea exculpatoria.
Además, aunque Asia se encuentra en libertad provisional, va a permanecer en la cárcel hasta que se produzca el fallo por razones de seguridad. El islamismo radical la quiere matar. Ya han ofrecido 5.000 dólares por su cabeza.
Pero lo de este miércoles ha sido un exitazo. Estoy emocionado, Lazaro R. Supongo que tu también. Sin duda la movilización social a nivel internacional ha ayudado. El mismo miércoles organizamos un acto frente a la embajada de Pakistán. Puedes ver aquí las fotos y el video del acto.
Esta buena noticia demuestra que la movilización tiene sus frutos. Cuando los ciudadanos de manera organizada decidimos alzar nuestra voz, somos imparables, Lazaro R.
Por eso es tan importante participar. Y lo de Planned Parenthood es INACEPTABLE. No sé si has tenido de ver el segundo video. La "doctora" Mary Gatter, Presidenta del Consejo de Directores Médicos de Planned Parenthood Federation of America aparece negociando con los órganos de los bebés abortados. Como si fuera una broker. ¡Repugnante!
Puedes verlo aquí: http://www.citizengo.org/es/26812-planificacion-familiar-trafica-con-organos-bebes-abortados
Y lo peor, Lazaro R. Dice abiertamente: "Quiero un Lamborghini” (coche de lujo)
¿Médicos?, ¿labor humanitaria? Son presuntos delincuentes, Lazaro R, que lo único que pretenden es hacer NEGOCIO con los órganos de los bebés abortados.
'Venderán' que hacen labor asistencial y que ayudan a las madres a decidir sobre su maternidad... bla, bla, bla. La realidad es que tienen el PEOR comportamiento de la especie humana. El peor. Sólo de escribirlo, me hierve la sangre…
¿Tú crees que estos establecimientos pueden seguir abiertos? Pide al Departamento de Justicia que intervenga
http://www.citizengo.org/es/26812-planificacion-familiar-trafica-con-organos-bebes-abortados
Ya sabes que estos tipos reconocen que la comercialización de órganos de bebés abortados es práctica habitual en todas sus filiales. ¿Te imaginas? ¿También en las de nuestro país?
Planned Parenthood y sus filiales no pueden permanecer ni un minuto más abiertas. ¡Tenemos que cerrarles! Pide al Departamento de Justicia que intervenga:
http://www.citizengo.org/es/26812-planificacion-familiar-trafica-con-organos-bebes-abortados
Gracias, Lazaro R, por estar siempre ahí. Gracias por defiende las causas justas. Juntos construimos un mundo más digno para todos. ¡Si se puede!
Un fuerte abrazo,
Luis Losada Pescador y todo el equipo de CitizenGO
PD. Tengo más buenas noticias. ¿Te acuerdas que el Senado de California pretendía retirar la estatua de fray Junípero Serra del Capitolio? Pues bien, el gobernador ha dicho que estará ahí "hasta el final de los tiempos”. ¡Bien! http://www.citizengo.org/es/21687-salvemos-fray-junipero-serra
PD2. Por favor, Lazaro R, firma y comparte. Tenemos que cerrar Planned Parenthood. ¡Podemos! ¿Puedes publicar la campaña en tu muro de Facebook? Mil gracias anticipadas. http://www.citizengo.org/es/26812-planificacion-familiar-trafica-con-organos-bebes-abortados
PD3. Te presento a parte del equipo de CitizenGO ;) https://www.flickr.com/photos/citizengo/sets/72157653880031094
Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de Miami Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016. Use la boleta en blanco.
No aceptamos contribuciones monetarias. Necesitamos que se
lo informe a todos los familiares, vecinos, amigos, compañeros de trabajo y a
todos.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment