No 1010 “En mi
opinión” Julio 29, 2015
“IN GOD WE
TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
LAZARO R GONZALEZ ALCALDE POR
MIAMI DADE
AMENPER: Revelación sobre nacimiento de
Obama en Kenia
Kogelo, Kenia—Durante la visita
del presidente Barack Hussein Obama al pueblo de su alegado padre en Kenia, un
miembro de la familia Obama produjo lo que se afirma que es la foto del momento
del nacimiento de Barack Hussein Obama. El miembro de la familia no quiere ser
identificado, pero inequívocamente afirmó que "si nos fijamos en los
orejas, no quedan dudas. Este es Junior Barack nacido de una elefante
keiniana”,
Se plantea nuevas preguntas
sobre el lugar del nacimiento del Presidente, y si su madre era realmente una
ciudadano de los Estados Unidos o si Barack fue adoptado por Ann Durham.
Cuando se le preguntó por el
cuerpo de prensa de casa blanca a comentar sobre el asunto, el portavoz Josh
Earnest aseguró a reporteros que "esta foto se podría haber tomado en
cualquier lugar. No hay ninguna característica distintiva en esta foto que
identificara positivamente que fue tomada en Kenia.". Cuando se le
preguntó si el presidente cree que la foto es auténtica, dijo, "el
Presidente está tan sorprendido por estas revelaciones como cualquiera y dice
que no recuerda el evento lo suficientemente bien como para poder hacer un
comentario, la primera vez que oyó sobre el particular es cuando leyó la
noticia en el periódico como todos los demás."
Fuentes sin identificar han
hecho declaraciones sobre esta noticia en relación con rumores de cierta
información de un cirujano plástico que pudiera haber hecho una operación
cosméticas reduciendo algo las orejas de elefante del presidente.
Fotos indican que las orejas de
Barack Obama, aunque aún mantienen un tamaño mayor que lo normal, han reducido
las características elefantinas que se pueden apreciar en fotos
anteriores.
Obama Just Made Many American Hearts Stop
With 9 Unimaginable Words
Obama's self-serving
comments came during...
Barack Obama
certainly seems to delight in traveling abroad and taking potshots at his
country and his political rivals — making the kind of remarks many would no
doubt consider unpresidential in a foreign setting. Obama also seems to
demonstrate an acute lack of awareness that, in leveling these kinds of
critiques and letting loose with off-the-cuff comments while visiting other
countries and mingling with other leaders, he does the very thing he claims to
find objectionable in others.
While on his African
tour, the president left his Ethiopian counterpart standing awkwardly and
uncomfortably silent in front of the international press corps while Obama
launched into a blistering critique of Republican White House hopefuls. As the
Associated Press reported in an article carried onYahoo! News, Obama took an
abrupt detour from the reason for the joint appearance with Ethiopia’s leader
and went hyper-political as he slammed Republicans Mike Huckabee, Ted Cruz and Donald
Trump.
“Obama’s comments
marked his most direct engagement in the race to succeed him,” according to the
AP account of the president’s near-meltdown while on foreign soil. “Until now,
he’s largely limited his commentary to policy differences with Republicans,
often sidestepping the names of specific candidates.”
The president was
particularly angry at his opponents’ attempts to derail the Iran nuclear
agreement he has fought so long to negotiate and now finds himself having to
defend against powerful pushback.
But the Obama
overseas comment that would likely get the most attention and raise the
most eyebrows among conservatives who can’t wait for the president to leave
office was what he said about running again.Fox News notes that Obama went “off-script” on Tuesday as he addressed the
African Union — it was a spontaneous, self-serving boast that apparently
included a rather odd reference to his own wealth.
“I actually think I’m a pretty good president.
I believe if I ran again, I could win.”
“But I can’t,” he
added.
Obama later said, “I
don’t understand why people want to stay so long, especially when they’ve got a
lot of money.”
Now why, one might
wonder, would President Obama find it useful or productive to his overseas
mission to say those nine words — “I believe if I ran again, I could win.” — as
they served no apparent purpose except to let him inflate and polish his own
ego?
During the same
presentation to the African audience in Ethiopia, Obama said something else
that many of his critics and opponents will likely jump on as
self-incriminating evidence of his own executive overreach. The Fox News report
on the president’s address quotes him as saying, without the slightest hint of
irony or tinge of self-awareness about his behavior:
AMEMPER: El
Guapo del Barrio
Cuando
el primer mandatario de una nación en un viaje a un país extranjero utiliza su
posición para atacar a enemigos políticos en su país de origen, está usando su
cargo para agendas políticas domésticas, crea un conflicto de intereses entre
su deber como oficial del estado y su política partidista. Cuando el pueblo
entrega a un presidente el puesto para la administración temporal del país,
este presidente tiene que poner su deber por delante del animal político y de
la egolatría personal.
Obama
en Kenia atacó por nombre de los aspirantes a las elecciones del 2016 del
partido Republicano, y mencionó inclusive el nombre del partido, haciendo
referencia de que no le gustaría dejar su presidencia a esos individuos por su
oposición al acuerdo de Irán. Fue un discurso político, y lo peor es que no
tenía un razonamiento viable, porque la oposición al acuerdo de Irán no es sólo
doméstica del partido Republicano, pero de todos los aliados de Estados Unidos
en Europa y el Medio Oriente.
Entonces, si ridiculiza a los candidatos republicanos, implícitamente está ridiculizando a sus aliados extranjeros.
Entonces, si ridiculiza a los candidatos republicanos, implícitamente está ridiculizando a sus aliados extranjeros.
Pero se
trata de un presidente que no tiene el concepto de su posición, no acepta la
crítica usual y necesaria que sistemáticamente recibe un mandatario en un país
democrático. Nunca ha habido un presidente de esta nación que haya
recibido las críticas con más arrogancia que Obama. Hay que recordar
simplemente a George W. Bush, como fue uno de los presidentes más criticado y
ridiculizado, y como supo aceptar el reto de su posición como lo hicieron sus
antecesores.
Pero
Obama prometió cambio, y ha habido cambio. Lo peor es que el cambio como todo
tiene sus consecuencias, y como un boomerang el cambio se vuelve hacia un nuevo
cambio por compensación.
Por eso
vemos que un candidato como Donald Trump que no hubiera podido tener un apoyo
de la ciudadanía en condiciones normales, se haya en primer lugar en las
encuestas.
El
público está ofendido y cansado de la conducta y las políticas de esta
administración, y está vertiendo su protesta en el candidato que más claramente
denuncia estas políticas.
No creo
de Donald Trump pueda o deba de ser el candidato del partido Republicano, pero
el mensaje que están enviando los votantes, debe de ser oído por los otros
candidatos.
Igual
que Obama no anda con paños calientes para atacar a los que se le opones,
llegando al punto de sacar los trapos sucios fuera de casa, la oposición debe
de no aguantar golpes y responder al mismo nivel, después de todo con conductas
como la de Kenia, Obama ha creado del rasero de cómo responder en la discusión,
y por eso Donald Trump está en primer lugar, porque ha respondido como hay que
responder en este nuevo escenario que ha cambiado las reglas.
No es
algo que queremos ver, llevar una campaña a un tipo de trifulca callejera baja
la dignidad de la nación, pero un guapo del barrio quiere imponer su
guapería, sólo puede ser combatido a su mismo nivel.
The ‘Unprecedented Move’ a Conservative
Congressman Just Took to Oust John Boehner From Leadership
·
Share This
·
·
·
·
A conservative congressman from North Carolina on Tuesday filed a motion
to oust Speaker John Boehner from his leadership position.
House Speaker John Boehner.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) filed a resolution to declare “the office of
Speaker of House of Representatives vacant,” effectively stripping Boehner
from his Speakership.
The motion accused Boehner of having “endeavored to consolidate power and
centralize decision-making, bypassing the majority of 435 Members of Congress
and the people they represent.”
It added, among other things, that “through inaction” the Ohio
representative has made Congress “subservient to the Executive and Judicial
branches.”
The action to oust Boehner was referred to by seasoned congressional
reporter Chad Pergram as an “unprecedented move.”
Rollcall reporter Matt Fuller tweeted that members “seem stunned.”
However, because Meadows did not file the resolution as a “privileged”
motion, it will be sent to the Rules committee instead of receiving an
immediate vote.
It was not clear who exactly supported Meadows’ resolution.
Neither Boehner nor Meadows immediately responded to a request for comment
from TheBlaze Tuesday evening.
You will NOT BELIEVE who was best man at John Kerry's daughter's wedding
- can the Secretary of State be impartial, read below
|
 |
|
||
Written by Michele Hickford, Editor-in-Chief on
July 28, 2015
You not might be
aware that in 2009, the daughter of Secretary of State John Kerry, Dr. Vanessa
Bradford Kerry, John Kerry’s younger daughter by his first wife, married an
Iranian-American physician named Dr. Brian (Behrooz) Vala Nahed, an
Iranian-American physician.
Of course you’re not
aware of it.
Brian (Behrooz) Nahed
is son of Nooshin and Reza
Vala Nahid of Los Angeles. Brian’s Persian birth name is “Behrooz
Vala Nahid” but it is now shortened and Americanized in the media to “Brian
Nahed.” At the time his engagement to Bradford Kerry, there was rarely any
mention of Nahed’s Persian/Iranian ancestry, and even the official wedding
announcement in the October 2009 issue of New York Times carefully avoids any
reference to Dr. Nahed (Nahid)’s birthplace (which is uncommon in wedding
announcements) and starts his biography from his college years.
Gosh, I wonder why??
Gee, do you think
Secretary Kerry should have recused himself from the negotiations with Iran at
the very outset because of his long-standing relationshipto
his Iranian counter-part, Mohammad Javad Zarif? Let me explain.
Zarif is the current
minister of foreign affairs in the Rouhani administration and has held various
significant diplomatic and cabinet posts since the 1990s. He was Kerry’s chief
counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations.
Sponsored by
RevContent
Secretary Kerry and
Zarif first met over a decade ago at a dinner party hosted by George Soros at
his Manhattan penthouse. What a surprise. I have to say, connecting the dots
gets more and more frightening.
But it gets even
worse. Guess who was the best man at the 2009 wedding between Kerry’s daughter
Vanessa and Behrouz Vala Nahed? Javad Zarif’s son.
Does this bother
anyone at all?
Apparently Kerry only
revealed his daughter’s marriage to an Iranian-American once he had taken over
as Secretary of State. But the subject never came up in his Senate confirmation
hearing, either because Kerry never disclosed it, or because his former
colleagues were “too polite” to bring it up.
As Front Page Magazine pointed
out several months ago, the nuclear talks with Iran were a tragic
farce, choreographed and orchestrated by Iran.
And unfortunately,
we’re going to have to live with the consequences. At least, I hope we live.
[Note: This article was written by Michele
Hickford, Editor-in-Chief]
|
|
Quantum
Geopolitics
By Reva Bhalla
Forecasting
the shape the world will take in several years or decades is an audacious
undertaking. There are no images to observe or precise data points to anchor
us. We can only create a picture and a fuzzy one at best. This is, after all,
our basic human empirical instinct: to draw effortlessly from the vivid imagery
of our present world and past experiences while we squint and hesitate before
faint, blobby images of the future.
In the
world of intelligence and military planning, it is far less taxing to base
speculations on the familiar — to simulate a war game that pivots on an Iranian
nuclear threat, a seemingly unstoppable jihadist force like the Islamic State
and the military adventurism of Russia in Eastern Europe — than it is to
imagine a world in which Russia is weak and internally fragmented, the jihadist
menace is contained by its own fractiousness and Iran is allied with the United
States against a rising Sunni threat. In the business world, it is much simpler
to base trades and strategies on a familiar environment of low oil prices and
high interest rates. Strategists in many domains are guilty of taking excessive
comfort in the present and extrapolating present-day assumptions to describe
the future, only to find themselves unequipped when the next big crisis hits.
As a U.S., four-star general once told me in frustration, "We always have
the wrong maps and the wrong languages when we go to war."
So how do
we break out of this mental trap and develop the confidence to sketch out
plausible sets and sequences of unknowns? The four-dimensional world of quantum
mechanics may offer some guidance or, at the very least, a philosophical
approach to strategic forecasting. Brilliant physicists such as Albert
Einstein, Louis de Broglie and Erwin Schrodinger have obsessed over the complex
relationship between space and time. The debate persists among scientists over
how atomic and subatomic particles behave in different dimensions, but there
are certain underlying principles in thecollection of quantum theories that
should resonate with anyone endowed with the responsibility of forecasting
world events.
Quantum Principles and Political Entities
Einstein
described space-time as a smooth fabric distorted by objects in the universe.
For him, the separation between past, present and future was merely a
"stubbornly persistent illusion." Building on Einstein's ideas,
celebrated U.S. physicist and Nobel Laureate Richard Feynman, some of whose
best ideas came from drawings he scribbled on cocktail napkins in bars and
strip clubs, focused on how a particle can travel in waves from point A to
point B along a number of potential paths, each with a certain probability
amplitude. In other words, a particle will not travel in linear fashion; it
will go up, down and around in space, skirting other particle paths and
colliding into others, sometimes reinforcing or canceling out another
completely. According to Feynman's theory, the sum of all the amplitudes of the
different paths would give you the "sum over histories" — the path
that the particle actually follows in the end.
The
behavior of communities, proto-states and
nation-states (at least on our humble and familiar planet Earth) arguably
follows a similar path. We have seen state lets; countries and empires rise and
fall in waves along varied frequencies. The crest of one amplitude could
intersect with the trough of another, resulting in the latter's destruction.
One particle path can reinforce another, creating vast trading empires. Latin
America, where geopolitical shifts can develop at a tortoise's pace in the
modern era, tends to emit long radio-like waves compared to the gamma-like
waves of what we know today as a highly volatile Middle East.
Applied Quantum Theories: Turkey
If we
apply the nation-state as an organizing principle for the modern era (recognizing
the prevalence of artificial boundaries and the existence of both nations
without states and states without nations), the possibilities of a state's path
are seemingly endless. However, a probability of a state's path can be
constructed to sketch out a picture of the future.
The first
step is to identify certain constants that have shaped a country's behavior
over time, regardless of personality or ideology (an imperative to gain sea
access, a mountainous landscape that requires a large amount of capital to
transport goods from point A to point B, and a fertile landscape that attracts
as much competition as it provides wealth). The country's history serves as a
laboratory for testing how the state has pursued those imperatives and what
circumstances have charted its path. What conditions were in place for the
state to fail, to prosper, to avoid being entangled in the collisions of bigger
states, to live in relative peace? We take the known and perceived facts of the
past, we enrich them with anecdotes from literature, poetry and song, and we
paint a colorful image of the present textured by its past. Then comes the hard
part: having the guts to stare into the future with enough discipline to see
the constraints and enough imagination to see the possibilities. In this
practice, extrapolation is deadly, and an unhealthy obsession with current
intelligence can be blinding.
Take
Turkey, for example. For years, we have heard political elites in the United
States, Eastern Europe and the Middle East lament a Turkey obsessed with
Islamism and unwilling or incapable of matching words with action in dealing
with regional competitors like Iran and Russia. Turkey was in many ways
overlooked as a regional player, too consumed by its domestic troubles and too
ideologically predisposed toward Islamist groups to be considered useful to the
West. But Turkey's resurgence would not follow a linear path. There have been
ripples and turns along the way, distorting the perception of a country whose regional role is, in the end, profoundly shaped by
its position as a land bridge between Europe and Asia and the gatekeeper
between the Black and Mediterranean seas.
How, then,
can we explain a week's worth of events in which Turkey launched airstrikes at
Islamic State forces and Kurdish rebels while preparing to extend a buffer zone
into northern Syria — actions that mark a sharp departure from the timid Turkey
to which the world had grown accustomed? We must look at the distant past, when
Alexander the Great passed through the Cilician Gates to claim a natural harbor
on the eastern Mediterranean (the eponymous city of Alexandretta,
contemporarily known as Iskenderun) and the ancient city of Antioch (Antakya)
as an opening into the fertile Orontes River Valley and onward to Mesopotamia.
We move from the point when Seljuk Turks conquered Aleppo in the 11th century
all the way up to the crumbling of the Ottoman Empire in the wake of World War
I, when a fledgling Turkish republic used all the diplomatic might it could
muster to retake the strategic territories of Antioch and Alexandretta, which
today constitute Hatay province outlining the Syrian-Turkish border.
We must
simultaneously look at the present. A contemporary map of the Syria-Turkey
border looks quite odd, with the nub of Hatay province anchored to the Gulf of
Iskenderun but looking as though it should extend eastward toward Aleppo, the
historical trading hub of the northern Levant, and onward through Kurdish lands
to northern Iraq, where the oil riches of Kiruk lie in what was formerly the Ottoman province of Mosul.
We then
take a long look out into the future. Turkey's interest in northern Syria and
northern Iraq is not an abstraction triggered by a group of religious fanatics
calling themselves the Islamic State; it is the bypass, intersection and
reinforcement of multiple geopolitical wavelengths creating an invisible force
behind Ankara to re-extend Turkey's formal and informal boundaries beyond
Anatolia. To understand just how far Turkey extends and at what point it
inevitably contracts again, we must examine the intersecting wavelengths
emanating from Baghdad, Damascus, Moscow, Washington, Arbil and Riyadh. As long
as Syria is engulfed in civil war, its wavelength will be too weak to interfere
with Turkey's ambitions for northern Syria, but a rehabilitated Iran could
interfere through Kurdistan and block Turkey farther to the east. The United
States, intent on reducing its burdens in the Middle East and balancing against
Russia, will reinforce the Turkish wavelength up to a point, while higher
frequencies from other Sunni players such as Saudi Arabia will run interference
against Turkey in Mesopotamia and the Levant. While Russia still has the
capacity to project military power outward, Turkey's moves in Europe and the
Caucasus will skirt around Russia for some time, but that dynamic will shift
once Russia becomes consumed with its own domestic fissures and Turkey has more
room to extend through the Black Sea region.
Thinking beyond Limitations
This
sketch of Turkey is by no means static or deterministic. It is, simply but
critically, the product of putting a filter on a lens to bring the state's
trajectory into clearer view. The assumptions we form must be tested every day
by incoming intelligence that can lead to refinements of the forecast at hand.
A quantum interpretation of the world will tell you that nothing is
deterministic, and we cannot know for sure that a certain outcome will or will
not happen based on the limited information we possess. We can only assign a
probability of something happening, and that probability will evolve over time.
As Stephen Hawking said, "It seems Einstein was ... wrong when he said,
'God does not play dice.' Not only does God definitely play dice, but He
sometimes confuses us by throwing them where they can't be seen."
We can
apply the same process to the ebb and flow of the Far East, with a resurgent
Japan responding to the reverberations of a powerful China and an artificially
divided Korea sandwiched in between. Or, the push and pull between France and
Germany on the European mainland as centripetal forces subsume the EU project.
Too often,
we see the future as we see the past — through the distorted lens of the
present. That is the flaw in our human instinct that we must try to overcome.
Constraints will apply, and probabilities will be assigned. But whatever the
time, direction or dimension we are operating in when forecasting geopolitical
events, we must simultaneously exist in the past, present and the future to
prepare for a world that we have yet to know.
Reprinting or republication of this report on websites is
authorized by prominently displaying the following sentence, including the
hyperlink to Stratfor, at the beginning or end of the report.
"Quantum Geopolitics is republished with permission of
Stratfor."
|
Una
respuesta del Pastor Alain Toledano Valiente a Percy Francisco Alvarado Godoy.
Esta es la
respuesta que le envié a un comunista que invadió mi buzón con un correo
titulado:Otra falacia de
Radio Martí: supuesta
"represión" contra minorías religiosas por Percy Francisco
Alvarado Godoy. (Foto abajo a la derecha)
Le saludo aunque no lo conozco; ni tampoco le he aprobado
que me escriba porque usted ni es amigo mío ni deseo mantener ningún tipo de
comunicación con Ud., pero ya que en su dedicación al espionaje Estatal
usted invade mi privacidad, aprovecho para que sepa algunas cosas.
La idea de llamar mentiroso y mercenario a todo el cubano que
reclama su derecho dentro de la Isla es muy común para personas como usted que
goza de todo el respaldo del gobierno. Estoy convencido de que el correo y el
servicio de Internet que usted usa no lo paga su bolsillo sino el
Estado, la merienda y comida que se come para mantenerse concentrado en el
ataque a todo lo que se exprese no acorde a los intereses de la dictadura
Castrista viene de la misma fuente, el Estado, de su mal llamada Revolución. Es
el mismo poder el que , el 21 de Noviembre del 2007 fue capaz de
convocar a todos los Órganos estatales y a la Seguridad del
Estado y a la policía política
para desalojarnos de nuestra casa, aprovechando cobardemente mi ausencia, ya
que esperaron que saliera temprano hacia el Templo y penetraron con todo tipo
de hierros e instrumentos tanto para desarmar, como para matar, en la casa,
donde estaba mi esposa y mis niñas; con las cuales estuvimos toda esa madrugada
bajándoles la fiebre altísima que tenían, quienes maltrataron a mis hijas, halándolas
de sus camitas y al abrir sus ojitos y pedir sus chancletas le dijeron “que con
chancleta y todo ese día irían con sus padres para la calle”; esto propicio que
quedaran nuestras hijas traumatizadas; una de ellas quedo
tartamuda, y al ver un policía en la calle irrumpían a gritos y se orinaban,
todo señor, por el buen servicio de su Revolución.
Soy un hombre que nací y he crecido bajo este régimen y
creo, que atacar a alguien, a tal punto, de usar todas las fuerzas de un
gobierno solo porque se exprese reclamando sus derechos; por el solo
hecho de que temen a que se sepa la verdad, es una cobardía. Pero más cobardía
es respaldar una mentira sabiendo que la es, para de esta manera sustentar a la
familia, porque usted, o señor, es pagado por el Estado para que lo defienda, y
eso, hasta usted lo llama mercenario.
Pregúntele a sus revolucionarios jefes, porque demolieron
nuestro templo en Santiago de Cuba y le dirán que por ilegalidad o
contrarrevolución; pregúntele donde están todos los bienes de la iglesia
que ellos se llevaron y hasta el día de hoy no han devuelto y que nosotros lo
vemos hoy en nuestra ciudad en la casa de sus jefes revolucionarios, y hasta lo
hemos visto comercializándolos en la bolsa negra en la calle, LO
NUESTRO.
Tuvimos que vivir como animales, en medio de los alacranes,
las ratas, las ranas y sapos, el maja y cuantos bichos mas, sin dormir para que
ninguno picara ni mordieran a una de nuestras hijas de 3, 4 y 12 años. En aquel
entonces, Berenice, la tercera, ha estado en tres ocasiones en
Terapia casi muriendo por una alergia respiratoria que debutó por las malas
condiciones de vida. Recuerdo que en aquel entonces tenía un vecino que ha
estado preso desde muy pequeño por robo y otras causas, este, señor político,
le dio un machetazo a nuestro panadero y le pico tres dedos, y la policía ni lo
tocó porque su madre poseía un buen poder monetario y quien sabe lo
que se dio para que se hicieran los ciegos. Ninguna jinetera que vivía a
nuestro alrededor, las cuales compraron sus apartamentos fue tocada, ningún
comprador de casa ha sido tocado hasta hoy, y le confieso, que de ellos
estábamos rodeado; y Cuba está llena de estos casos, pero no, su Revolución no
los toca, solo toca al que le amenaza su estancia en el poder.
Señor mercenario, sé que al leer este correo usted
informará, como mercenario que es, de mis palabras y mi posición para que su
Revolución arremeta con furia contra mí. Soy un cubano dentro de la Isla
y usted puede estar seguro que sus jefes me conocen, así que no tendrá
que darles tantos datos de mí, soy el Apóstol Alain Toledano Valiente,
( foto arriba a la derecha junto a su
esposa) quien no es pagado por ningún
sistema para decir estas cosas. Tengo mis principios, que son mi
verdadero pago; los cuales han tratado sus dirigentes de ensuciar con sus
falacias y que sé que armarán ahora una cacería de brujas contra mí a partir de
su patriótico informe pagado por el Estado cubano.
Tenga vergüenza y no me escriba más sus disparates
castristas e ignorantes y mentirosos a mi buzón, limite su espionaje a mi
persona, no invada más mi espacio ni viole mis derechos a la privacidad, chao,
político desconocido, espero no saber nunca más de usted.
Líder del Movimiento Apostólico en Cuba. Toledano Valente
está radicado en la Ciudad de Santiago de Cuba, uno de los más prominentes
líderes de las cerca de 20 redes del Movimiento Apostólico Internacional en
Cuba. Sus colaboraciones aparecen en el Blog Religión en Revolución.
MR. STICKAROUND: A THIRD TERM FOR
PRESIDENT OBAMA?-Edit!!
|
DEAR HERALD: ONE MONTH & A DAY AFTER I SENT THIS
UPON NOTICING THE OCCUPY DEMOCRATS FACEBOOK TRIAL BALLOON & A COUPLE OF DAYS
SINCE THE AP STORY CAME OUT (FORWARDED TO YOU), HERE'S THE PRESIDENT TODAY
HIMSELF WITH ANOTHER THIRD-TERM TRIAL BALLOON ("I'D WIN A THIRD TERM IF I
COULD RUN AGAIN...", QUITE A HINT "TO THE TROOPS" & YET
ANOTHER HIT AT CONVENTIONAL WISDOM'S PRESUMED DEMOCRATIC FRONT-RUNNER, SOMEWHAT
OF A 2008 RERUN). THOUGH I SENT THIS YESTERDAY TO THE SUN-SENTINEL (AFTER TWICE
REQUESTING EXCLUSIVITY RELEASE FROM YOU; & INFORMING YOU OF THE FORWARD TO
A NEWSPAPER AD AGENCIES AT CUTBACK TIME CONSIDER TO BE A COMPETITOR, IT WAS
YOURS TO BEGIN WITH, SO I ASK YOU AGAIN TO RUN IT & IF YOU CONSENT, GO
AHEAD AND STOP IT AT LAUDERDALE,
EXERCISING EXCLUSIVITY. NO REASON THE HERALD SHOULD LAG OTHER MEDIA RE
BACKGROUNDING THIS IMPORTANT & TIMELY ITEM.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philip Riggio <phvr38@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:59 PM
Subject: MR. STICKAROUND: A THIRD TERM FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA?
To: Letters to The Miami Herald <heralded@miamiherald.com>
Cc: Alexandra Villoch <avilloch@miamiherald.com
The Editor
The Miami Herald
MR. STICKAROUND: A THIRD TERM FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA?
Posted on Facebook tonight (6/27) is Occupy Democrats's trial balloon or third-partied promotion for a third term for President Barack Obama. To thus follow the left's Hemispheric Zeitgeist, the president, a noted constitutional law scholar, would have to bypass the Constitution's 22nd Amendment (adopted 1947) limiting the incumbent to two consecutive terms; however, there's time to undo the inconvenience (as Prohibition was) and the president may be motivated or encouraged by the rationale of his Cuba statement lastDecember 17, that "that was long before most of us were born," by the example of Mexico's Álvaro Obregón, or perhaps by friend Raúl Castro's brother's "¿Elecciones para qué?". In the event, there must be unease in Mrs. Hillary Clinton's camp tonight, as if the Bernard Sanders surge and those pesky continuous seemingly minor but newsworthy leaks weren't enough.
Philip V. Riggio
From: Philip Riggio <phvr38@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:59 PM
Subject: MR. STICKAROUND: A THIRD TERM FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA?
To: Letters to The Miami Herald <heralded@miamiherald.com>
Cc: Alexandra Villoch <avilloch@miamiherald.com
The Editor
The Miami Herald
MR. STICKAROUND: A THIRD TERM FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA?
Posted on Facebook tonight (6/27) is Occupy Democrats's trial balloon or third-partied promotion for a third term for President Barack Obama. To thus follow the left's Hemispheric Zeitgeist, the president, a noted constitutional law scholar, would have to bypass the Constitution's 22nd Amendment (adopted 1947) limiting the incumbent to two consecutive terms; however, there's time to undo the inconvenience (as Prohibition was) and the president may be motivated or encouraged by the rationale of his Cuba statement lastDecember 17, that "that was long before most of us were born," by the example of Mexico's Álvaro Obregón, or perhaps by friend Raúl Castro's brother's "¿Elecciones para qué?". In the event, there must be unease in Mrs. Hillary Clinton's camp tonight, as if the Bernard Sanders surge and those pesky continuous seemingly minor but newsworthy leaks weren't enough.
Philip V. Riggio
|
The
IMF Threatens to Kill the U.S. Dollar
According to
Bloomberg and other sources, the International Monetary Fund is expected to
announce a reserve currency alternative to the U.S. dollar on October 20th of this year, which
experts say will send hundreds of billions of dollars moving around the world,
literally overnight. This announcement is expected to trigger one of the
most profound transfers of wealth in our lifetime. Bloomberg reports that
this decision comes on the heels of China pushing for their own currency to be
elevated to reserve currency status. So if you want to protect your
savings & retirement, you better get your money out of U.S. dollar
investments and into the one asset class that rises as currencies collapse.
The IMF Holds Supreme Power. DAMOS GELLER
The International
Monetary Fund, or IMF, is one of the most secretive and powerful organizations
in the world. They monitor the financial health of more than 185
countries. They establish global money rules and provide “bail-out” assistance
to bankrupt nations. Some are warning that any move by the IMF to
supplant the U.S. dollar could be catastrophic to American investments.
According to Juan
Zarate, who helped implement financial sanctions while serving in George W.
Bush’s Treasury department, “Once the [other currency] becomes an alternative
to the dollar, rules of the game begin to change.”
Leong Sing Chiong,
Assistant Managing Director at a major central bank, said this dollar
alternative “is likely to transform the financial landscape in the next 5-10
years.”
Currency expert Dr.
Steve Sjuggerud warned, “I’ve been active in the markets for over two decades
now, but I’ve never seen anything that could move so much money, so quickly.
Hundreds of billions of dollars could change hands in a single day after this
announcement is made. The announcement will start a domino effect, that
will basically determine who in America gets rich in the years to come, and who
struggles.”
Dr. Sjuggerud says if
you own any U.S. “paper” assets—and that includes stocks, bonds, or just cash
in a bank account–you should be aware of what’s about to happen and know how to
prepare. A number of experts believe the recent spike in gold and silver
prices is a direct result of the IMF’s action. Precious metals
notoriously rise when the U.S. dollar falls.
The Death of the U.S. Dollar in One Frightening Graph
For the last 600
years, there have been six different global reserve currencies controlled by
world superpowers. The latest – the U.S. dollar – has dominated world currency
for over 80 years. The alarming fact is, global reserve currencies have
collapsed every 80-90 years for the last six centuries! What does this mean for
America and the dominance of the U.S. dollar? Based on recent evidence and
long-standing historical trends, experts predict the imminent collapse of the
U.S. dollar! What’s more alarming? Many Americans aren’t yet doing the one
thing that will save their savings & retirement from U.S. dollar collapse.
Just take a look at
the graph below. It shows the lifespan of dominant currencies going back 600
years. Notice that the U.S. dollar has now been the dominant currency for 88
years, about the same length of time as its predecessors:
It’s obvious why
experts say that the U.S. dollar’s days as the world’s reserve currency are
coming to a climactic end.
All Fiat Currencies Collapse
“Fiat” currency is
paper currency backed by nothing tangible. As opposed to “sound money” which is
was backed by gold or some other valuable commodity, a fiat currency is backed
by nothing more than faith in the government. The U.S. dollar has been a fiat
currency since Nixon closed the gold window in 1971 in what was the greatest
heist in American history. The scary fact is, the average life span of a fiat currency
is 40 years, and the U.S. dollar has now exceeded 40 years as a fiat currency!
Prior to 1933 and for
well over 100 years, the dollar was backed by gold, and $20 bought you an ounce
of gold. But after the government stole all U.S. citizens’ gold in 1933 for a
$20 paper certificate, gold was revalued at $35 U.S.D., meaning the dollar was
devalued by 43% overnight and all foreign and domestic holders of dollars were
effectively robbed.
After Nixon closed
the gold window completely in 1971, it took $67 to buy an ounce of gold,
devaluing the U.S. dollar by 50% again. Today, it takes well over a thousand
U.S. dollars to buy that same ounce of gold. Why? Because the U.S. dollar is
now nothing more than a fast-declining Federal Reserve note backed by a corrupt
government that is saddled with $18 trillion in unpayable debt — growing by $10
million per minute!
Protect Yourself Before It’s Too Late
This “Paper Money
Experiment” has run its course. The Federal Reserve, the U.S. government, and
Wall Street crooks have misused their power by mismanaging the dollar, and now
there are global repercussions. The debt load sitting on top of the U.S.
dollar is unsustainable and will continue to crush the dollar’s purchase power
until no one wants to hold U.S. dollars, and they are no longer accepted for
global trade. The dollar’s collapse means that every single one of your paper
investments that are dollar-backed – stocks, mutual funds, money markets, cash
accounts, etc. – will go down right along with the dollar! Meanwhile, the government
and the banks will find a way to protect themselves at your expense.
So as we say goodbye
to the U.S. dollar’s dominance, it doesn’t have to mean goodbye to your savings
& retirement. Remove at least some of your savings & retirement from
the dollar-backed, paper-based financial system and protect it with the one
asset that has outlasted every fiat currency ever invented for the last 5,000
years: Gold.
(Call (888) 511-2549 to receive your free
copy of Damon Geller’s popular book, “Defend Your Money against Gov't
Confiscation,” or fill in the form below)
‘First Kenyan-American’ president, Obama, tells
Africans that America would elect him to third term
Views:
President Obama is pretty sure he could earn another term in the White
House — if he wanted it.
Playing into years of speculation and criticism from the political far
right, Obama tapped into a commonly circulated fear among his opponents: that
he secretly wants to abolish the two-term limit on U.S. presidents and take
over the White House indefinitely.
“Let me be
honest with you; I do not understand this,” said Obama in a speech before
delegates of the African Union in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. “I am in my second
term. It has been an extraordinary privilege for me to serve as president of
the United States. I cannot imagine a greater honor or a more interesting job.
I love my work. But under our Constitution, I cannot run again. I can’t run again.”
People were really, really clapping for this. Maybe that’s because Obama
used the moment to compare the rule of law in the U.S. with some African
nations, where elections have not prevented incumbent leaders from entrenching
themselves in office — even when they lose the popular vote.
“I actually think I’m a pretty good president; I think if I ran, I could
win,” Obama added. “But I can’t. So there’s a lot that I’d like to do to keep
America moving, but the law is the law.”
Then again, our president has a pen and phone; and he’s assured us he’s
not afraid to use them.
Earlier, Obama told an energized crowd in
Nairobi, Kenya, that he is “the first Kenyan-American to be president of the
United States. That goes without saying.”
Hey, if identity politics works here, why can’t it work in Kenya? At
least Obama can sell the idea to other nations, even if they’re far less
diverse or tolerant than ours — that that’s how America works.
Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de Miami Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016. Use la boleta en blanco.
No aceptamos contribuciones monetarias.
Necesitamos que se lo informe a todos los familiares, vecinos, amigos,
compañeros de trabajo y a todos.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment