Friday, July 31, 2015

No 1012 "En mi opinion" Julio 31, 2015

No 1012 “En mi opinión”  Julio 31, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de Miami

Ted Cruz’s Blunt Response to Mitt Romney Saying It Was ‘Way Over the Line’ to Say Iran Deal Would Make Obama ‘Financier’ of Terror


Republican presidential candidate and Texas Sen. Ted Cruz fought back Thursday after Mitt Romney criticized him for saying the Obama administration would become the “leading financier of radical Islamic terrorism” if Congress approves the Iran nuclear deal.
Romney had taken to Twitter to say that Cruz’s comment was “over the line.”
In a blunt response on KFYO radio in Lubbock, Texas, Cruz hit back at the 2012 Republican nominee, saying: “One of the reasons Republicans keep getting clobbered is that we have leaders like Mitt Romney or like Jeb Bush who are afraid to say that.”
Cruz said the nuclear deal would allow for more than $100 billion to go to Iran, the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism, and that the same money would also end up in the hands of Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis and other radical Islamic terrorist groups.
“When you send billions of dollars to jihadists trying to kill Americans, you bear responsibility for the murder they carry out with the money you have given them” Cruz told host Chad Hasty, adding that the Iranian supreme leader routinely leads chants in which he shouts, “Death to America.”
Cruz previously characterized the deal as “catastrophic” and said that it poses the “gravest national security threat” more than anything else for three reasons.
“One, if it goes through, hundreds of billions of dollars will flow to Iran that they will use to fund radical Islamic terrorism to murder Americans. Two, because it leaves four American hostages languishing in Iran. The last president to leave hostages in Iran was Jimmy Carter [and] that appeasement profoundly weakened America,” Cruz said. “But three, this deal accelerates Iran’s acquiring nuclear weapons, and they have pledged to use those nuclear weapons.
LRGM: Google Translate: El candidato presidencial republicano y senador de Texas Ted Cruz se defendió el jueves después de Mitt Romney lo criticó por decir que la administración de Obama se convertiría en el "líder financista del terrorismo islámico radical" si el Congreso aprueba el acuerdo nuclear de Irán.
Romney había tomado a Twitter para decir que el comentario de Cruz fue "sobre la línea."
En una respuesta contundente en la radio KFYO en Lubbock, Texas, Cruz bateó de vuelta en el candidato republicano de 2012, diciendo: "Una de las razones republicanos seguir recibiendo una paliza es que tenemos líderes como Mitt Romney o como Jeb Bush que tienen miedo de decir que ".
Cruz dijo que el acuerdo nuclear permitiría más de $ 100 mil millones para ir a Irán, el principal estado patrocinador mundial del terrorismo, y que el mismo dinero también terminaría en manos de Hamas, Hezbolá, el huzíes y otros grupos terroristas islámicos radicales .
"Cuando se envía miles de millones de dólares para los yihadistas tratan de matar a los estadounidenses, que son responsables por el asesinato que llevan a cabo con el dinero que les han dado" Cruz dijo al anfitrión Chad Hasty, y agregó que el líder supremo iraní conduce rutinariamente cantos en la que grita , "Muerte a América."
Cruz caracterizado previamente el acuerdo como "catastrófica" y dijo que plantea el "más grave amenaza a la seguridad nacional", más que nada por tres razones.
"Uno, si sigue adelante, cientos de miles de millones de dólares fluirá a Irán que utilizarán para financiar el terrorismo radical islámico para asesinar estadounidenses. Dos, porque deja a cuatro rehenes estadounidenses que languidecen en Irán. El último presidente que dejar rehenes en Irán fue Jimmy Carter [y] que el apaciguamiento profundamente debilitado Latina ", dijo Cruz. "Pero tres, este acuerdo acelera la adquisición de armas nucleares de Irán, y ellos se han comprometido a utilizar esas armas nucleares.




Correo electrónico recibido del camarada nacionalista argentino Dr. Rodolfo Brieba:
¡¡¡En los últimos tiempos mi vida se complica !!!
* Agradezco a todos mis amigos que todavía se atreven a relacionarse conmigo a pesar de mis defectos
* Nací blanco, lo que hace de mi un racista.
* Yo no voto a la izquierda, lo que hace de mi un fascista.
* Soy heterosexual, lo que hace de mí un homófobo.
* No soy de ningún sindicato, lo cual hace de mí un traidor a la clase obrera y un aliado de las grandes empresas.
* Yo soy cristiano, lo que hace de mí un perro infiel.
* Soy mayor de 60 años y estoy jubilado, lo que hace de mí un viejo estúpido…
* Yo reflexiono, sin creerme todo lo que la prensa me dice, lo que me hace un reaccionario.
* Yo valoro mi identidad y mi cultura, lo que hace de mí un xenófobo.
* Me gustaría vivir con seguridad y ver a los delincuentes en la cárcel, lo que hace de mí un miembro de la Gestapo.
* Creo que cada uno debería ser recompensado según sus méritos, lo que hace de mí un antisocial.
* He sido severamente educado y se lo agradezco a mis padres, Lo cual hace de mí un verdugo de niños que se opone a su bienestar.
* Yo creo que la defensa de mi país es cosa de todos los ciudadanos, lo cual hace de mi un militarista.
¡He aquí una breve reseña de mi reputación!
Al menos somos tres, el amigo que me ha enviado el mensaje, ¡vos que lo recibes y yo!”

Wow! And make certain you read, at the bottom of this page, the part that says it will take 30 more seconds to read.! Please forward to all you know and ask them to forward to all they know.

The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora, Mexico does not like it. Can you believe the nerve of these people? It's almost funny. The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico !

The state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona 's new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico. It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off. A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona's new 'Employer Sanctions Law' will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, - Arizona's southern neighbor - made up of mostly small towns - cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their home towns from the USA without jobs or money.

The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States. Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business license. The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government instead of ours.

'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogales. 'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their home towns in Sonora without jobs,' she said 'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona .

Wrong! The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico, and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico's citizens. It's time for the Mexican government, and its citizens, to stop feeding parasitically off the United States and to start taking care of its/their own needs.

Too bad that other states within the USA don't pass a law just like that passed by Arizona. Maybe that's the answer, since our own Congress will do nothing.!

*New Immigration Laws*
Be sure to read to the bottom or you will miss the message...
1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools. 
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
3. All government business will be conducted in our language.
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office.
6. Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or any other government assistance programs. Any who are a burden will be deported.
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
8. If foreigners come here and buy land, their options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens naturally born into this country.
9. Foreigners may have NO protests; NO demonstrations, NO waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, NO bad-mouthing our president or his policies. These will lead to deportation.
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted and, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged.
All assets will be taken from you. 

Too strict.? The above laws are the current immigration laws of MEXICO.! If it's good for American's to obey Mexican laws, then it's good vice versa.!!!

This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on. An idea whose time has come: Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. The self-serving must stop. This is a good way to do that. It is an idea whose time has come. Have each person contact a minimum of twenty people on their address list, in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have read the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.
You are one of my 20. If you don't have twenty, pass it on to as many as you can.!
Lazaro R Gonzalez: Google translate: PARECE MÉXICO ES ENOJADO CON ARIZONA
Guao! Y asegúrese de que usted lea, en la parte inferior de esta página, la parte que dice que tomará 30 segundos más para leer.! Por favor, transmita a todo lo que sabe y les pedimos que enviar a todos.

El zapato está en el otro pie y los mexicanos del estado de Sonora, México no le gusta. ¿Puedes creer el descaro de esta gente? Es casi gracioso. El estado de Sonora está enojado con la afluencia de mexicanos en México!

Los legisladores estatales del estado mexicano de Sonora viajaron a Tucson para quejarse nueva ofensiva empleador de Arizona 's sobre los ilegales desde México. Parece que muchos ilegales mexicanos están regresando a sus lugares de origen y los funcionarios del gobierno del estado de Sonora se enumeró. Una delegación de nueve legisladores del estado de Sonora fue en Tucson el martes para indicar que las nuevas sanciones a los empleadores 'Ley' de Arizona tendrán un efecto devastador en el estado mexicano. En rueda de prensa, los legisladores dijeron que Sonora - vecino del sur de Arizona - formado por las ciudades en su mayoría pequeños - no puede manejar la demanda de vivienda, trabajo y escuelas que se enfrentará como trabajadores mexicanos regresan a sus lugares de origen de los EE.UU. sin empleo o dinero.

La ley de Arizona, que entró en vigor el 1 de enero, castiga a los empleadores que a sabiendas contratan a Arizona personas sin documentos legales válidos para trabajar en los Estados Unidos. Las sanciones incluyen la suspensión o pérdida de, su licencia de negocio. Los legisladores mexicanos están enojados porque sus propios ciudadanos están regresando a sus lugares de origen, la colocación de una carga en su gobierno estatal en lugar de la nuestra.

'¿Cómo puede Arizona aprobara una ley como esta?' preguntó el representante mexicana Leticia Amparano-Gámez, quien representa a Nogales. 'No hay una sola persona que vive en Sonora que no tiene un amigo o pariente de trabajo en Arizona ", dijo, hablando en español. 'México no está preparado para esto, por los tremendos problemas que se enfrentará a medida que más y más mexicanos que trabajan en Arizona y que estaban enviando dinero a sus familias regresen a sus lugares de origen en Sonora sin trabajo, "ella dijo" Somos una sola familia, social y económicamente ", dijo de la gente de Sonora y Arizona.

Incorrecto! Los Estados Unidos es una nación soberana, no una filial de México, y sus contribuyentes no son responsables por el bienestar de los ciudadanos de México. Es hora de que el gobierno de México, y sus ciudadanos, para detener la alimentación parasitariamente de los Estados Unidos y para empezar a cuidar de sus / sus propias necesidades.

Lástima que otros estados de los EE.UU. no pasan una ley al igual que pasó por Arizona. Tal vez esa es la respuesta, ya que nuestro propio Congreso no hará nada.!

* La ley de inmigración de Nueva *
Asegúrese de leer en el fondo o te vas a perder el mensaje ...
1. No habrá programas especiales bilingües en las escuelas.
2. Todas las boletas estarán en el idioma de esta nación.
3. Todos los asuntos de gobierno se llevará a cabo en nuestro idioma.
4. Los no residentes no tendrán derecho a voto no importa el tiempo que están aquí.
5. Los no ciudadanos NUNCA podrán ocupar un cargo político.
6. Los extranjeros no serán una carga para los contribuyentes. Sin bienestar, no hay cupones de alimentos, sin servicios de salud, o cualquier otro programa de ayuda del gobierno. Cualquier que son una carga serán deportados.
7. Los extranjeros pueden invertir en este país, pero debe ser una cantidad al menos igual a 40,000 veces el salario mínimo diario.
8. Si los extranjeros vienen aquí y comprar tierras, se limitarán sus opciones. Algunos paquetes que incluyen propiedad frente al mar están reservados para los ciudadanos nacidos de forma natural en este país.
9. Los extranjeros pueden no tener las protestas; NO manifestaciones, NO ondeando una bandera extranjera, ninguna organización política, NO hablando mal de nuestro presidente o sus políticas. Éstas darán lugar a la deportación.
10. Si usted viene a este país ilegalmente, se le cazado de forma activa y, cuando se ven atrapados, enviado a la cárcel hasta que su deportación se pueden arreglar. Todos los activos se tomará de ti.

Demasiado estricta.? Las leyes anteriores son las leyes de inmigración actuales de MEXICO.! Si es bueno para el americano de obedecer las leyes mexicanas, entonces es bueno viceversa. !!!

Esto tomará menos de treinta segundos para leer. Si está de acuerdo, por favor transmitirlo. Una idea cuyo momento ha llegado: De alguna manera, eso no parece lógico. No tenemos una élite que está por encima de la ley. El egoísta debe parar. Esta es una buena manera de hacerlo. Es una idea cuyo tiempo ha llegado. Haga que cada persona en contacto con un mínimo de veinte personas en su lista de direcciones, a su vez, pedir a cada uno de aquellos que hagan lo mismo.
En tres días, la mayoría de personas en los Estados Unidos de América se han leído el mensaje. Esta es una propuesta que realmente debe ser pasada alrededor.
Usted es uno de mis 20. Si usted no tiene veinte años, pasarlo a tantos como puedas.!

Scott Walker Defunded Planned Parenthood Conservative, 

As the Republican-led House leaves on Summer vacation with no vote to defund Planned Parenthood (or anything else), clearly 'actions speak louder than words'. 

As Governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker DEFUNDED Planned Parenthood.  He'll do the same as President.

Governor Walker also signed a law requiring women seeking abortions to receive an ultrasound. 

As you can imagine, Planned Parenthood's top-boss Cecile Richards blew a gasket! 

"Women are very clear that forced government ultrasounds are not 'cool.'" Richards called Walker's statement "appalling" and added "the real problem is the record behind his words." (NPR, 5/27)

Scott Walker is a man who keeps his promises.  He says what he means. He does what he says. 

And Wisconsin's Planned Parenthood no longer gets $1.13 million in taxpayer funds every year to subsidize their recently exposed the ghoulish practice of harvesting and trafficking the body parts of unborn children.   

As a genuine conservative, Scott Walker's proven track record shows that time-after-time, and on issue-after-issue his actions speaks louder than his words. 

After 6-1/2 miserable years of Obama's wrecking-ball of a failed Presidency, isn't it time for a conservative American President with the 'guts' and courage to make America great again?

Scott Walker is tough as nails, never quits, and he knows how to WIN - just like Ronald Reagan.

Let's bring bold, conservative leadership to America - Scott Walker 2016

Thank you for everything that you've already done.

Bob Adams

Will This Bill Curb Food Stamp Abuses?

·         by: AAN Staff
Congressman Rice (R-SC) has introduced legisltaion in the House to reform the SNAP program that provides money for food. The new act is known as the "Nutritious Options for Meals Act."

The premise of the bill says that SNAP is a program that was created to be a "supplemental nutrition program." The law would restrict what SNAP purchases consumers could make to: Special Supplemental Nurition Programs for Women, Infants, and children with the addition of lean meat and poultry. SNAP benefits would also be used to buy: vegetables, fruits, milk, juice, whole grain cereal, eggs, peanut butter, legumes, whole grain bread, lean meat, and poultry."

The bill aims to alter SNAP to reflect it's original purpose. To jprovide healthy food for all Americans who need it.

“The original food stamp program was a good, common sense program,” said Rice.  “It paired nutritious farm surpluses with Americans in need.  Over the years, the nutrition portion of food stamps has become obsolete.  Today, beneficiaries can use taxpayer dollars to purchase nearly anything in the grocery store.  Meanwhile, families barely living over the poverty threshold are pinching pennies and clipping coupons to make ends meet.
“Furthermore, our country is more health conscious than it’s ever been,” continued Rice.  “Even fast food establishments are revamping their menus with healthier items.  Sadly, obesity is still on the rise and the only way to curb this trend is by changing what we eat.  While independent Americans have the right to purchase what they want to eat, taxpayer-funded food programs should follow nutritious standards to keep recipients healthy and able to transition off government assistance.”
- See more at:

GOP Tries To Block This Outrageous Change to the Citizenship Oath

·         Washington Examiner 
·         by: Pete Kasperowicz
More than two dozen House Republicans have proposed a bill that would prevent the Obama administration from changing the Oath of Allegiance that people take when becoming naturalized U.S. citizens.

The bill from Rep. Diane Black, R-Tenn., is a reaction to last week's announcement that the Obama administration's U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services wants to water down the oath. USCIS has said it will not require naturalized citizens to say they will "bear arms on behalf of the United States" or "perform noncombatant service."

The agency said it made the change to accommodate people's religion or conscientious objection. It said officials administering the naturalization oath are free to let people avoid those phrases if they claim to have a "deeply held moral or ethical code."

But the move angered many conservatives, who said the change further weakens U.S. immigration rules by giving people citizenship rights in the United States without some of the corresponding responsibilities to defend the nation. Black said Congress needs to ensure the Obama administration doesn't create a wave of naturalized citizens who don't feel obligated to defend the country they have adopted as their new home.  Source: 
Washington Examiner

*Time is Like a River..*

 *Afraid he is right about this. Scary stuff! Time is like a river. You
cannot touch the water twice, because the flow that has passed will never
pass again. *  
      *Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in
Jacksonville, Florida in January, 2015 when he said America will not come
back. He wrote: *

      *The American Dream ended (on November 6th, 2012 ) in Ohio.The second
term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of
the white Christian males who  discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and
developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind.*
 *A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays, Government Workers, Union
Members, Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood , uninformed young
people, the "forever needy," the  chronically unemployed, illegal aliens
and other "fellow travelers" have ended Norman Rockwell 's America .  
 *The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch... The Pit Bull is in the back
yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky 's
"Rules for Radicals" and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod, along with
international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their
beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order. *
 *    Our side ran two candidates who couldn't even win their own home
states, and Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing "post
Sandy " tribute that elevated the  "Commander-in-Chief" to Mother Teresa
status. (Aside: with the way the polls were run, he didn't need any help!) * 
 *People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never
again comment on or concern myself with the afore mentioned coalition which
has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our  traditions without a
shot being fired.*
 *    You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual
acts of defiance and massive displays of civil  disobedience to get back
the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not
moderates & shy not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and
restore our beloved country to its former status.*

 *    Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes
and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has
timidly frittered away due to"white guilt" and political correctness...*
    *Got the guts to pass it on? You bet !!!!!*

LRGM: Google translated:  * El tiempo es como un río .. *

 * Miedo tiene razón en esto. Cosas de miedo! El tiempo es como un río. Usted
no puede tocar el agua dos veces, porque el flujo que ha pasado nunca se
pasar de nuevo. *

       * Franklin Graham hizo estas declaraciones en la Primera Iglesia Bautista en
Jacksonville, Florida, en enero de 2015, cuando dijo que Estados Unidos no llegará
espalda. El escribio: *

      * El sueño americano terminó (el 6 de noviembre de 2012) en Ohio.The segundos
plazo de Barack Obama será el último clavo en el ataúd de la herencia de
los varones cristianos blancos que descubrieron, explorado, pionero, se asentaron y
desarrollado la mayor República en la historia de la humanidad. *

   * Una coalición de los negros, los latinos, las feministas, los gays, los Trabajadores del Estado, de la Unión
Miembros, los extremistas del Medio Ambiente, Medios de comunicación, Hollywood, desinformado joven
personas, los "necesitados", siempre los, extranjeros ilegales crónicamente desempleados
y otros "compañeros de viaje" han terminado Latina Norman Rockwell 's. *

  * El Cocker Spaniel es el porche frontal ... El Pit Bull se encuentra en la parte posterior
yarda. La Constitución de Estados Unidos ha sido reemplazado por Saul Alinsky 's
"Reglas para Radicales" y picapleitos Chicago, David Axelrod, junto con
Internacional Socialista George Soros se tira de los hilos en su
marioneta de color beige para traernos Ley 2 del Nuevo Orden Mundial. *

 * Nuestro lado corrió dos candidatos que ni siquiera pudo ganar su propia casa
estados, y Chris Christie ayudaron a Obama sobre la parte superior con un post que brilla intensamente "
Sandy "homenaje que elevó el" Comandante en Jefe "a la Madre Teresa
de estado. (Aparte: con la forma en que se ejecutan las urnas, que no necesitaba ninguna ayuda!) *

  * La gente como yo son completamente políticamente irrelevante, y yo nunca lo harán
nuevamente comentar o ocuparme de la coalición ya mencionado, que
ha entregado nuestra cultura, nuestro patrimonio y nuestras tradiciones sin
disparo. *

 * Nunca más fuera de votar a esta gente. Tomará individuo
actos de desafío y exhibiciones masivas de desobediencia civil para volver
los derechos que les han permitido llevar. Tomará zelotes, no
moderados y tímido no llegan a-través-del-pasillo RINOs a derecho en este barco y
restaurar nuestro amado país a su estado anterior. *
 * Los que vendrán después de nosotros tendrá que arriesgan sus vidas, sus fortunas
y su honor sagrado para traer de vuelta a la República que esta generación tiene
tímidamente malgastado debido a la "culpa blanca" y la corrección política ...

SHOCK POLLS: Trump Just Scored Two HUGE Wins In A Way That Could Redefine The Race

The Trump 2016 train continues to gain steam.
When the home team suffers an unexpected and startling defeat on its own field, fans and commentators will most likely take notice. And that’s just what’s happening today as the GOP front-runner for the 2016 presidential nomination, Donald Trump, scores a big win in a state where a rival or two could certainly be considered favorite sons.
The website Florida Politics reports on what it calls the “shock poll” that finds Trump leading Jeb Bush by a significant margin in Florida, the state where George W.’s younger brother served as a very popular governor from 1999-2007.


According to the just-released St. Pete Polls survey of more than 1900 likely GOP primary voters in the Sunshine State:
For the first time this year, Donald Trump tops a state poll of GOP presidential candidates in Florida.
A St. Pete Polls survey released on Wednesday shows the New York businessman with 26 percent support, with Jeb Bush in second place with 20 percent.


And what about Marco Rubio’s standing in the newly released survey of GOP voters? The senator from Florida is also found to be trailing Trump. Rubio places fourth in the new poll with 10 percent of the respondents backing him. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker came in third with 12 percent.
What many observers and analysts of presidential politics might find equally if not more surprising are the results of a different voter poll — one conducted by the left-leaning Public Policy Polling (PPP). In this national survey, Donald Trump has a higher favorability rating than any of his GOP competitors among Latinos who were questioned July 20-21 about their candidate preferences.
According to MRC-TV coverage of this survey of 1,087 registered voters of Hispanic heritage, Trump scored a favorability rating of 34 percent. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio, who one might think would hold an advantage with Latinos because of their backgrounds, were close behind with 30 percent and 29 percent, respectively. Jeb Bush, whose wife hails from Mexico and who frequently delivers campaign messages in fluent Spanish, won 31 percent of the Latino vote in this PPP poll.
You may recall that, as Western Journalism reported, Donald Trump has confidently said he would win the Latino vote should he become the nominee of the party. Trump has made that prediction several times, despite the fact that he continues to generate heated controversy over his campaign-launching remarks about dangerous, criminal aliens illegally entering the United States.

Hillary Clinton and the Fatal Conceit

Here are some statistics regarding the speeches that four presidential hopefuls used to announce their candidacies:
·         Jeb Bush: 2,217 words; “grow” or “growth” used 7 times
·         Hillary Clinton: 5,125 words; “grow” or “growth” used 32 times
·         Martin O’Malley: 2,158 words; “grow” or “growth” used 3 times
·         Bernie Sanders: 1,729 words; “grow” or “growth” used 0 times
So, is Hillary Clinton 4.5 times more pro-growth than Jeb Bush?  No, although she may well be infinitely more pro-growth than Bernie Sanders.  If you judge by Hillary’s announced policy proposals, she isn’t pro-growth at all.  Rather, Hillary is a “neopaleoliberal.”
David Brooks summed up Hillary’s neopaleoliberal economic philosophy as follows:
“This neopaleoliberalism is built… on a tremendous faith in government to manage the economy more intelligently than the private sector. It’s… an optimistic faith in the power of planning. The private sector is not evil or power hungry, just kind of dumb.”
F. A. Hayek had a term for this: “the fatal conceit.”  Rather than relying on price signals to coordinate economic activity, Hillary proposes to give bureaucrats even more power to intervene in economic decisions than they have under President Obama.
Again, in Brooks’ words:
“Hillary Clinton used her kickoff economic address to embrace the idea that government can write rules to govern how much companies pay their workers. Government can direct investors toward more sensible long-term investments. Government can refashion the way companies distribute equity in their companies. Government can determine how companies should structure and manage themselves.”
This is progressive statism, the kind that has produced economic stagnation everywhere that it has been tried.  It is the polar opposite of “pro-growth.”
So, why is Hillary Clinton, a leftist that is being forced even farther to the left by Bernie Sanders, trying to convince us that she is pro-growth?  Simple.  Hillary wants to win the election, and she knows that the voters prefer strong economic growth to government-enforced income redistribution in pursuit of “fairness.”
The 2016 presidential race is shaping up to be an almost pure “Wanniskian” election.  In his seminal 1978 book, The Way the World Works, Jude Wanniski noted that democracies tend to evolve two political parties: a party of economic growth, and a party of income redistribution.  In the run-up to the 2016 election, America’s two great political parties are polarizing along Wanniski’s axis to perhaps the greatest degree in living memory.
Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush has made his goal of “4 percent growth as far as the eye can see” the centerpiece of his campaign.  The other Republican hopefuls are also running as “pro-growth” candidates, although they have not been bold enough to state a numerical goal.
Hillary knows that if voters come to believe that Jeb Bush would actually deliver “4 percent growth as far as the eye can see,” her candidacy is doomed.  Here’s why.
In 2012, the reviled “one percent” received 22.46% of total income, leaving 77.54% for “the 99 percent.”  Meanwhile, real GDP (RGDP) growth under Obama (whose policies are more favorable to growth than Hillary’s) has averaged 1.79% thus far.
Even if Hillary could (somehow) maintain Obama’s growth rate while (somehow) instantly rolling the income distribution clock back to 1976 (when “the one percent” claimed only 8.95% of total income, the all-time low), “the 99 percent” would be better off with Bush.  They would be earning more total income by the end of his second term, and they would enjoy a much more vibrant economy along the way.
One of Hillary’s most dangerous flights of economic fancy is the notion that it is possible to boost RGDP growth by raising capital gains taxes.  Higher taxes on capital mean less capital available for the private economy to invest, and less incentive to invest what capital remains after Hillary’s tax hikes and government-directed “investments.”
Here is the iron law of economic growth:
GDP = 0.44 (nonresidential assets) + 0.08 (residential assets)
If we want more growth (whether “fair” or not) we have to invest more capital.  No matter how you do it, raising capital gains taxes will result in less investment.
But wait!  Hillary has a clever “sliding scale” capital gains tax plan that would increase incentives for long-term investment.
No, it wouldn’t.  Hillary’s plan would reduce total investment, while forcing investors to hold financial assets longer.  In the process, it would cripple our venture capital industry, which has been America’s greatest driver of wealth creation.
Hillary does not seem to understand the difference between physical assets (which include intellectual property) and paper claims on the cash flows produced by those assets. (In case Hillary hasn’t noticed, stock goes on the right side of the balance sheet.)  America may or may not need longer-term assets, but it definitely does not need longer-term (i.e., less liquid) liabilities.
Consider the situation of the “angel investor” (of which I am one).  Angels are typically successful entrepreneurs that like to plow their capital gains back into new startup ventures.
In my case, all of my experience relates to getting a company off the ground.  I don’t pretend to be good at running or advising companies that have more than about 100 people.  Hillary’s capital gains tax plan aims to prevent me from selling my shares in a successful startup (say, to an investor that specializes in “growth phase” companies), and using the proceeds to fund more startups.  Obviously, doing this can only reduce, not increase, economic growth.
Yes, if Hillary knew more about “seed round” and “Series A” venture capital firms, she might not be proposing such a naïve and destructive capital gains tax plan.  However, this is the fatal conceit: the notion that central planners can ever know enough to add value in a price-driven market economy.
Under the circumstances, Hillary’s only hope in a general election match-up with Jeb Bush would be to somehow convince the voters that Bush’s 4% growth goal is unrealistic, or that he isn’t serious about it.  If the Republicans offer a candidate that is both credible and genuinely pro-growth, Hillary Clinton’s neopaleoliberalism is toast.

Porque  tanta gente se alegro de la desgracia de los Cubanos:

Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de  Miami Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016.  Use la boleta en blanco.
No aceptamos contribuciones monetarias. Necesitamos que se lo informe a todos los familiares, vecinos, amigos, compañeros de trabajo y a todos.

En mi opinión