.“EN MI
OPINION” ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’.
"EMO" Nota: Estoy fuera de Miami y teniendo problemas de
coneccion, hace unos momentos en Facebook calificaron de "Span" varios
de mis mensajes, no se si es una casualidad, un problema o censura. Ya
no me extrana nada. Si no reciben ningun otro mensajes en los proximos dias,
quizas no lo pueda hacer mas. Saludos, Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino.
El dictador chavez murió
como él quiso. Hace unos 4 Años chávez
en elecciones les pidio a los venezolanos que lo nombraran presidente de
por vida, los venezolanos no lo hicieron... pero DIOS si... “Fue presidente de Venezuela hasta su muerte” Los castros se lavaron
las manos y lo enviaron a morir en Caracas... Ahora el individuo que destrozo a Venezuela tendrá que
comparecer ante el creador que lo juzgara y decidirá cuál será su estado por la eternidad. Que DIOS lo
juzgue, Amen. LRGM. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzAsMHV2gWo
Venezuela's 'Comandante' Hugo Chavez dies
Hugo Chavez, socialist leader of Venezuela, dies after long battle with cancer at the age of 58.
By Tracy Connor, Staff Writer, NBC News
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the charismatic
leftist who dominated his country with sweeping political change and flamboyant
speeches, died Tuesday at
age 58, after a long battle with cancer that was shrouded in mystery and
prevented him from being inaugurated for a fourth term.Adored or reviled for his self-styled populist revolution, Chavez held sway over Venezuela through a cult of personality, government reforms that championed the downtrodden, and an endless stream of rhetoric denouncing capitalism, imperialism and the United States.
The "Chavistas" praised El Comandante for reducing extreme poverty and expanding access to health care and education. Critics blamed him for high inflation, food shortages, escalating crime and mismanagement of the country’s oil industry.
Human rights groups lambasted him for politicizing the judicial branch, and undermining the democratic system of checks and balances.
To many he was a charming populist who sang and danced on his weekly television show and gave the impoverished a voice; others saw him as an autocrat who plastered his portrait all over the country and failed to deliver on the promises of what he called the "Bolivarian revolution."
"He will be remembered as someone who generated over 14 years an international presence and impact way beyond his country's size or wealth and beyond his own talent and personal charisma," said Jorge Castenada, the former Mexico foreign minister and NBC's Latin American policy analyst.
"And I think he'll be remembered for having tried to make a life of poor people in Venezuela better but in the end of the day, having made it worse. When the consequences of his economic policies become apparent, it will end up that he spent an enormous amount of money to make people a little better off for a short period of time."
The last two years of his presidency were overshadowed by his health struggles. After declaring himself free of an unspecified cancer, he fended off a tough challenge to win re-election in 2012 — even giving an epic nine-hour speech during the campaign.
He soon relapsed and was rushed to Cuba for surgery. He was deemed too sick to be sworn into office in early January, and was still gravely ill when he made a surprise return to Venezuela in mid-February, heralded on a Twitter account with 4 million followers.
His deputies insisted he was still in control, signing documents and holding meetings in a Caracas hospital room even if a tube in his throat had silenced his well-known voice. But by this week, the end seemed imminent with reports of a new respiratory infection.
Slideshow: Hugo Chavez through the years
The life of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez from his rise as a lieutenant colonel after his failed coup attempt in 1992.
Launch slideshowIn an address to the nation Tuesday afternoon, Vice President Nicholas Maduro said Chavez was facing his "most difficult hours" and claimed the cancer was an "attack" by his enemies. A few hours later, he announced Chavez's death at 4:25 p.m.
"Honor and glory to Hugo Chavez," an emotional Maduro said in Spanish on Venezuelan television, calling for public memorials at every town square in the country but warning against violence or hatred.
Born July 28, 1954, to schoolteachers in a small Venezuelan village, Chavez was raised by his grandmother and entered the military academy in Caracas at age 17. Six years later, inspired by the life of 19th century South American revolutionary Simon Bolivar, he formed a secret movement within the army.
Rising through the military to the rank of captain, he led a bloody coup attempt in 1992 that failed and landed him in prison. Pardoned two years later, the ex-paratrooper re-launched his revolt against the ruling class and announced his candidacy for president in 1998.
"The resurrection of Venezuela has begun, and nothing and no one can stop it,'' he bellowed to a roaring crowd after a landslide victory made him the youngest president in the history of Venezuela.
As president, Chavez created a new constitution and had the name of the country changed to the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. He took greater control of the state-run oil company, expanded the country’s armed forces, and instituted government programs to create jobs, housing and services for the poor.
A 2009 report by the progressive think tank Center for Economic and Policy Research found poverty was cut in half during the first decade of Chavez’s rule; child mortality fell by a third; malnutrition deaths were down by 50%; and college enrollment almost doubled.
At the same time, one non-government report estimated Venezuela’s murder rate quadrupled while Chavez was in power. In 2012, inflation hit 18%. Accusations of corruption and nepotism dogged his administration.
Problems aside, he enjoyed tremendous loyalty from his supporters. A 2002 coup during an economic crisis kept him out of power for just two days — and he claimed the United States had orchestrated it.
Chavez’s relations with the U.S. — referred to derisively as the "empire" in his epic speeches — were icy. He called President George W. Bush "the devil" and "the king of vacations." In 2010, he demanded Secretary of State Hillary Clinton resign "along with those other delinquents working in the State Department."
He often lavished praise on Libya’s Moammar Gadhafi and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, but his staunchest ally was Cuba. He kept the island nation flush with oil in exchange for its well-trained doctors and teachers, and he was visiting Havana when he fell ill in June 2011.
In an address to the nation a few weeks later, he admitted neglecting his health and said it was Fidel Castro who got him to admit he wasn’t feeling well, leading to the discovery of a tumor in his pelvis and emergency surgery.
In the following months, the twice-divorced Catholic shuttled between Cuba and Caracas for treatment even as he sought a fourth term, made possible because he had pushed through the abolition of term limits in the constitution he had rewritten.
Days before the election he would win with 54 percent of the vote to his opponent’s 45 percent, he spoke to a rally of supporters in Caracas, displaying the trademark swagger that had made him one of Latin America’s most captivating, if polarizing, leaders.
"Since I haven’t failed you in these 14 years," he said, according to the Associated Press. "I promise I won’t fail you in the next presidential term.
"Because Chavez doesn’t lie. Because Chavez doesn’t sell out. Because Chavez is the people. Because Chavez is truth. Because all of you are Chavez. We all are."
“EMO”
Lázaro R González Miño: Una simple sugerencia: La persona más
indicada para ser presidente de Venezuela es MARIA CORINA MACHADO. Pero si los
Venezolanos se quieren seguir revolcando en la mierda pueden escoger a este… 09:00 PM ET
Henrique Capriles sobre Hugo Chávez: "Fuimos adversarios, nunca enemigos"
(CNNEspañol.com) - El dirigente opositor venezolano Henrique Capriles Radonski
expresó sus condolencias a la familia y seguidores de Hugo Chávez en nombre de
la Mesa de la Unidad Democrática.
"Fuimos adversarios, nunca enemigos. Este es un
mensaje desde el respeto y la solidaridad. Es un mensaje a todos los
venezolanos, sin discriminaciones, sin excepciones", dijo Capriles leyendo
un comunicado.Aseguró que desde la oposición garantizan la paz y su apoyo para que así sea. "Esperamos que el Gobierno actúe con estricto apego a su deber constitucional", agregó.
Señaló además que "esta no es la hora de la diferencia, es la hora de la paz, es la hora de la unión, del compromiso y de demostrar nuestro profundo amor por Venezuela".
"Venezuela nos reclama a todos que estemos a la altura de las siguientes circunstancias, en la unidad asumimos ese compromiso", indicó Capriles.
Venezuela Expels 2 US Diplomats; Vice President Claims Hugo Chavez was Poisoned By Andrew O'Reilly. Enviado por Enrique Enriquez
After reiterating that President Hugo Chávez's
health is looking grave, Venezuela’s vice president lashed out at the country’s
“enemies” and expelled two U.S. diplomats whom he accused of spying on the
country’s military.
At a press conference
on Tuesday, Vice President Nicolás Maduro also pointed to the U.S. and other
foreign countries of somehow poisoning Chávez with cancer.
Following a lengthy
introduction of numerous officials in attendance, Maduro said U.S. military
attaché David Delmonaco will be expelled from the country for conspiring
against the government and the armed forces. Greg Adams, spokesman for the U.S.
Embassy in Caracas, confirmed the attaché is Delmonaco, but had no immediate
comment.
"I'm sure we will
be formulating some sort of response from Washington,” he said.
“He has been thrown
out. He’s got 24 hours to leave Venezuela. Our national Armed Forces must be
respected. We’ve already legally notified the American government,” Maduro
said, as quoted in the leading Venezuelan newspaper, El Universal.
Foreign Minister Elias
Jaua also announced the expulsion of a second U.S. official, also a U.S. Air
Force attache.
“We’re after other
forces that are also conspiring in this poisonous effort. They’re trying to
create disruption. They have taken all possible measures to hurt our economy,”
Maduro said.
The Pentagon did not
comment, though it confirmed the expulsions.
"We are aware of
the allegations made by Venezuelan Vice President Maduro over state-run
television in Caracas, and can confirm that our Air Attache ... is en route
back to the United States," said Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Pentagon
spokesman.
Maduro made his speech
only hours after the country’s Communications Minister, Ernesto Villegas,
announced that Chávez is suffering from "a new, severe" respiratory
infection which has made breathing more difficult.
Chávez has battled an
unannounced form of cancer since 2011 and has deteriorated rapidly since his
reelection in November, with many pundits claiming he is near his death.
Continuing his assault
on the U.S. and other foreign governments, Maduro broached the idea that Chávez
was poisoned or somehow infected with the infection by "enemies,"
such as the United States.
The vice president
compared Chávez’s sickness to that of the former Palestinian Liberation
Organization’s leader Yasser Arafat.
“We have no doubt that
Commandant Chávez was attacked with this illness, we have not a single doubt,”
Maduro said. “The established enemies of our land specifically tried to harm
the health of our leader.”
Maduro said he will
order the creation of a “scientific commission” to look at this alleged
conspiracy that Chávez was sickened through medical means.
“We already have
leads, which will be further explored with a scientific investigation,” Maduro
said.
Arafat died in 2004,
less than a month after coming down with “flu-like” symptoms. Conspiracy
theorists and some Palestinian leaders suggest that Arafat was poisoned
medically by Israeli operatives.
“There have been too
many cases throughout history, including the most recent, of the Palestinian
leader, Yasser Arafat, it’s widely known that was poisoned medically.”
The U.S. government
may be mum so far, but Latin American experts were quick to dismiss Maduro's
speech as wild and nonsensical.
“This clown show
demonstrates that these guys are amateurs and play their hands too easily,”
said Chris Sabatini, an analyst for America's Society/Council of the Americas,
a think tank in New York City.
It's poorly executed
plan for a post-Chávez Venezuela, Sabatini said.
“This is a desperate
government peddling in absurdities,” he said.“They needed some sort of cover
and now they don’t know what to do.”
Adam Isacson, a
researcher at the Washington Office on Latin America, said the timing of the
accusations was meant to reassure the Venezuelan people that, despite his face
having virtually from public sight, Chávez's revolution continues on track.
“Maduro is trying to
assert himself as a leader. This could be seen as the first move in the next
election," Isacson said.
“Maduro now has a lot
more freedom to act,” Isacson said of the expulsion. “Clearly Hugo Chávez with
a tube down his throat did not order this.”
Chávez has run
Venezuela for more than 14 years as a virtual one-man show, gradually placing
all state institutions under his personal control. But the former army
paratrooper, who rose to fame with a failed 1992 coup, never groomed a
successor with his force of personality.
The Associated
Press contributed to this report.
Estoy Escribiendo Como
Cubano... Pero Creo Que La Historia
Se Repite... Ricardo
Samitier.
Y solamente los que leemos HISTORIA...
podemos saber
Estas Similitudes Históricas...
Enrique IV estaba
excomulgado por el Papa... y había liderado
Tres guerras contra los Católicos... y
el PAPA se oponía a que fuera
El rey de Francia... fue coronado Rey
de Francia cuando se convirtió
al Catolicismo... y se dice que dijo: “Paris Bien Vale Una Misa”
400 años después Fidel Castro se dice
que dijo: “Levantar La Prohibición
De Celebrar El 24 De
Diciembre Bien Vale El Reconocimiento Del Papa”
y en esa forma Castro Paso de ser un
EXCOMULGADO por el Papa Juan XXIII
a BUEN CATÓLICO...
ante la opinión mundial...
Chávez y Fidel Castro... fueron siempre
beneficiados y porque no decirlo:
PROTEGIDOS de
los Gobiernos SOCIALISTAS...
El primer Golpe militar que triunfo en
el siglo XX fue el 4 de Septiembre 1933...
Ha quedado TAPADO que el triunfo fue
gracias al Millón de Dólares
Dado por Summer Wells a Batista para
que pague al ejército que hacía dos
Meses no cobraban...
Eso fue hecho por orden de Roosevelt...
el golpe se “CONSOLIDO” en toda la
Isla... también quedo Tapado que fue el
primer golpe COMUNISTA que triunfo...
He aquí la lista de los principales...
que fracasaron...
Comenzamos por el Potankin en Rusia en
1905, los Spartacist en Alemania 1918,
El “Caballero de la Esperanza” en
Brasil “Movimiento de los Tenientes”
Liderado por Luis Carlos
Preste...1931... La sublevación de la marina en
Chile 1931...
Nadie puede NEGAR
que TODOS LOS PARTIDOS POLÍTICOS Cubanos A PARTIR del 4 de
Septiembre FUERON SOCIALISTAS... el
partido “Autentico” se hacía y continua
Aun en el exilio llamándose “ANTI
IMPERIALISTA”...
Afirmo que Fidel Castro se beneficio de
todos los gobiernos pues fue BOTELLERO
Durante esos gobiernos... Y SU MUJER era BOTELLERA Del gobierno de BATISTA...
y ese fue el motivo ALEGADO por Fidel
en su divorcio de Mirta Díaz Barlart...pues
FIDEL en los motivos del divorcio
afirmó que él desconocía que su mujer era botellera...
Estando preso en Isla de Pinos y su
abogado fue PELAYO CUERVO NAVARRO...
YA DIVORCIADO DE MIRTA... y siendo Díaz
Balart su ex suegro... y Ministro de Batista...
lo que quiere decir que NO fue
indultado por influencia familiar...
Fue indultado porque Batista... una
prueba más del SOCIALISMO de Batista...
En Venezuela vemos como Chávez...
también se beneficio de Los gobiernos
“SOCIALISTAS DEMOCRÁTICOS” a los
extremos Que Caldera un PRESIDENTE SOCIALISTA
Lo indultó Igual que Castro fue
indultado por Batista...
Como ven la Historia se repite...
cuando tenemos en los puestos
Importantes gente con antecedentes
SOCIALISTAS...
Hoy en todos los países están en los
puestos importantes la gente
Que fueron “Revolucionarios” en los
años 60...
El que dude que han llegado a esos
puestos con la ayuda de una Organización
Que desea establecer un gobierno FEUDAL
único Mundial... Está en su derecho
Pero como explicar... como toda las
ORGANIZACIONES se ayudan y complementan
Como hemos visto RÁPIDAMENTE...La
Historia se repite... NO EXACTAMENTE...
Pero se repite... lo que No SE con que
periodo y con qué hechos históricos
COMPARAR a los ESTADOS UNIDOS... CON
OBAMA de presidente...
Esto sucedió
en Febrero 12 Y la Prensa No Dice Nada...
Pero dedican horas a
noticias bobas...Para mantenernos “ENTRETENIDOS”
Davis
Shaw quien dono entre $200 y $300 Mil A la Campaña de Reelección de
Obama...
Consiguió el permiso para venderle a
los chinos De los Departamento
del Tesoro, Defensa y “HOME Security” Que traducido al español es Seguridad de la Patria! Para venderle a los Chinos una
compañía que tiene Acceso
al Petróleo de USA en el Golfo y en Canadá
Como
Dije ayer estamos en la ETAPA de la Guerra Por los MERCADOS... fase anterior a
la Guerra Mundial Esta Venta Hace 40 Años Serian TraiciónVean en este enlace la
noticia
http://freebeacon.com/china-deal-benefits-obama-donors/
Este era el presidente de Venezuela: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAc9GAYty_U&feature=endscreen
Chavez Propped Up Cuba, 'Father' Figure Fidel Castro Tuesday, 05 Mar 2013 07:11 PM By Bill Hoffmann
Chavez assumed the presidency in Venezuela, he formed
a very close bond with Cuban President Fidel Castro — one that boosted Cuba’s
economy through trade, advanced its health care system and bolstered its
military might.
"Venezuela is traveling towards the same sea as the Cuban people, a sea of
happiness and of real social justice and peace," Chávez said during a
visit to Havana in 1999, the same year he rose to power.
One of the first major ties between the two countries came in 2000, when the
two presidents inked an agreement under which Venezuela sent 50,000 barrels of
oil per day to Cuba at a heavy discount. The shipment was nearly doubled by
2005.
In exchange, Cuba sent thousands of specialists in the fields of education, the
arts, sports and medicine to Venezuela.
In 2005, the two countries hammered out a contract to bring tens of thousands
of health care workers, including doctors and nurses, to Venezuela and
establish them in brand-new health care centers.
Chávez and Castro signed a declaration ripping the Free Trade Area of the
Americas, a program supported by the United States as an "expression of a
hunger to dominate the region."
Cuba also helped Venezuela free itself from U.S. influences on its military by
helping train its soliders in guerrilla warfare and counterinsurgency.
In 2007, Chávez signed an agreement with Cuba to embark on a series of
technical projects, including the construction of an underwater fiber optics
cable.
Venezuelan and Cuban scientists also worked together to improve their
countries' food production — spearheading a research project to improve the
growing of rice.
Last summer, as The New York Times reported, Chavez announced an agreement with
Cuba to create a factory to produce Coppelia ice cream, famous in Cuba for its
tropical flavors.
Washington has kept a weary eye on the ongoing cooperation between Venezuela
and Cuba with the idea they are trying to dominate the Caribbean economically
and militarily. And both sides have fired verbal shots.
President George W. Bush’s Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice slammed Cuba as
an “outpost of tyranny.’’ She labeled Chavez a “negative force’’ in Latin
America.
Chávez called Bush’s diplomatic efforts "a false democracy of the elite.’’
The friendship between Venezuela and Cuba long predates Castro. Diplomatic ties
between the two powers were first established in 1902. In 1913, they agreed to
an extradition treaty.
The bond between the two men was often described as a father-son relationship —
with Castro was seen as a father figure to Chavez.
"Fidel to me is a father, a comrade, a master of perfect strategy,"
Chavez said in 2005.
RED STATE. Morning Briefing For March 6, 2013. Erick Erickson.
Yesterday, the White House announced it would stop White House tours in response to sequestration.
Congressman Louie Gohmert of Texas responded by offering an amendment to the pending continuing resolution that would prohibit federal dollars spent to cover the costs of President Obama’s golf games.
Speaker John Boehner and the Republican Leaders ruled that Congressman Gohmert’s amendment was not relevant to the continuing resolution and threw it out.
Today, House conservatives will join with their Republican colleagues to vote on what is called a “closed rule.” This is a vote that will allow Republican leaders to bring to the floor of the House of Representatives the continuing resolution without having to deal with Congressman Gohmert’s amendment.
It will also prevent Republicans from being able to defund Obamacare.
Today, House Republicans will vote on a rule in the House of Representatives that, once approved, will allow the continuing resolution to pass while enabling and funding Obamacare.
House Conservatives will make it happen. In fact, House Conservatives who vote for the rule are voting to fund Obamcare. Passing the rule then conveniently voting against the actual continuing resolution cannot be given a pass.
Today, conservative groups must set a new standard — voting for the rule on the continuing resolution must be scored against. . . . please click here for the rest of the post →
Jihadis training in your neighborhood?
Investigator describes setup as infrastructure for attack
Investigator describes setup as infrastructure for attack
One of the investigators who worked on a report about
terror training camps operating inside the United States describes the network
as no more or less than an infrastructure for attack.
WND previously reported on a documentary called "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S.," and how it offers evidence that "Muslims of America" operates a series of training camps in the U.S.
Jason Campbell is project manager for the Christian Action Network, which was behind the training camps investigation.
He described for WND some of his visits to the camps, which have been located in New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma Michigan, Colorado, California and Washington.
"The one that really gets you concerned is in Georgia," he said. "You go down a road and all of a sudden it's just woods, and there are two roads that go straight down to the camp. It's dark because of the trees. And one of the roads is named Mecca and the other Medina."
Watch the trailer for "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." and share it with your neighbors, your local police officials and your representatives in Congress.
"If there ever was an infrastructure for terrorism, this is it," he told WND.
He said the camps themselves are in remote areas with few neighbors, and mostly self-sufficient, such as having their own water supply and often food stores. They also are closed to outsiders, with the women sometimes taking off-campus jobs, but little other interaction.
"If you died there, they bury you there," he said. "There are no permits from the Department of Health…"
WND previously reported on a documentary called "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S.," and how it offers evidence that "Muslims of America" operates a series of training camps in the U.S.
Jason Campbell is project manager for the Christian Action Network, which was behind the training camps investigation.
He described for WND some of his visits to the camps, which have been located in New York, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Texas, Oklahoma Michigan, Colorado, California and Washington.
"The one that really gets you concerned is in Georgia," he said. "You go down a road and all of a sudden it's just woods, and there are two roads that go straight down to the camp. It's dark because of the trees. And one of the roads is named Mecca and the other Medina."
Watch the trailer for "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." and share it with your neighbors, your local police officials and your representatives in Congress.
"If there ever was an infrastructure for terrorism, this is it," he told WND.
He said the camps themselves are in remote areas with few neighbors, and mostly self-sufficient, such as having their own water supply and often food stores. They also are closed to outsiders, with the women sometimes taking off-campus jobs, but little other interaction.
"If you died there, they bury you there," he said. "There are no permits from the Department of Health…"
The locations
are run by Muslims of the Americas Inc., a tax-exempt organization, and it has
been directly linked by court documents to Jamaat ul-Fuqra. The organization
operates communes of primarily black, American-born Muslims throughout the U.S.
The investigation confirmed members commonly use aliases and intentional
spelling variations of their names and routinely deny the existence of Jamaat
ul-Fuqra.
Click here to
watch the trailer!
The group openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in compounds where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority.
U.S. authorities have probed the group for charges ranging from links to al-Qaida to laundering and funneling money into Pakistan for terrorist activities. The organization supports various terrorist groups operating in Pakistan and Kashmir, and follows Sheikh Mubarak Gilani.
He boasts of conducting "the most advanced training courses in Islamic military warfare."
The jihadist organization is thought to be responsible for nearly 50 attacks on American soil, but the U.S. government refuses to list it among foreign terrorists.
In a recruitment video captured from Gilani's "Soldiers of Allah," Gilani states in English: "We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America."
Jamaat ul-Fuqra is thought to have been responsible for the beheading murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan.
The documentary called "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." provides compelling evidence of how "Muslims of America" operates, and already has caught the attention of neighbors and local police officials.
Gilani's American headquarters is in Hancock, N.Y., where training is provided to recruits who are later sent to Pakistan for more jihadist paramilitary training, according to law enforcement authorities.
A Justice Department report to law enforcement agencies, prepared in 2006, provides a glimpse into how long Jamaat ul-Fuqra or "Muslims of America" has been operating inside the U.S.: "Over the past two decades, a terrorist group known as Jamaat ul-Fuqra, or 'Community of the Impoverished,' has been linked to multiple murders, bombings and various other felonies throughout the United States and Canada."
Gilani's "communes" are described by law enforcement as "classically structured terrorist cells."
Help spread the word! Watch the trailer for "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." and share it with your neighbors, your local police officials and your representatives in Congress.
As WND reported, a covert visit to a Jamaat ul-Fuqra encampment in upstate New York by the Northeast Intelligence Network found neighboring residents deeply concerned about military-style training taking place there but frustrated by the lack of attention from federal authorities.
Campbell told WND the compounds raise his concern because of their proximity in Georgia to a prison, in New York to a water supply and other such circumstances.
He said the information about the camps has come from law enforcement sources, from the organization's own investigation, and, tellingly, from information from insiders who have left.
Click here to learn more. Jihadist who abandoned violence for Christianity
Kamal Saleem was trained in terror starting at age 7 at a PLO assault camp, learning to know and hate his enemies, was indoctrinated in radical Islam on his mother's knee and studied with his father how to despise Christians and Jews.
He's told his story in the book, "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption," as well as in a gripping DVD called "In the Red Chair," where he describes how he used to use his power – all of it – to change the world for Islam.
He dined with Moammar Gadhafi, his website says he served under Yasser Arafat and has Arab royalty in his family tree and he worked as a career mercenary, taking his terror activities worldwide. Ultimately, he was recruited by the Saudi royal family to infiltrate the United States with a campaign of radical Islam.
But Kamal Saleem now has renounced terrorism, adopted a home in America, found Christ and has spoken against terror and radical Islam at universities across the nation.
How could this change happen?
Actually, as he explains of his own life and its changes, it was a severe accident that broke his back and the love of a Jewish man, Jesus, that ultimately put him on the right course.
It is an amazing personal story that every Christian and every American should read: "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption."
"My car was very small and it has a T-top, so when the 18-wheeler broad-sided me, I ejected from car and landed on my head in a mud hole upside down," he recalls.
"I cried out for Allah, but Allah didn't come to save me. I cried, 'Allah where are you?'" Saleem added.
Rescuers, doctors and hospital staff then introduced him to something he had never seen. He says he was shown the unconditional love of God, something that is foreign to Islam.
"In Islam, everything is conditional. For example, in the Quran, there is not one place where Allah says 'I love my people,' not once. The word love is not mentioned in the Quran," Saleem said.
In his surgeon's house, Saleem says he was amazed by the love everyone showed to him. He also says it was in the doctor's house that he also noticed something special about Christian marriage and the treatment of women.
"Women in our (Islamic) culture are nothing. They are equal to the goat or the rug. Her purpose is to be married to her husband to give him pleasure. When a husband marries a wife, he purchases her sexual organs," Saleem said.
Saleem has a warning for the Western world: "Islam is like a cancer. It grows and expands until it eventually consumes and suffocates the host."
He says his knowledge of the Muslim Brotherhood's mission and methods compels him to warn Americans about what is happening under the radar in their own country.
"The Muslim Brotherhood is here specifically to destroy the house of the United States of America and bring about the Islamic House and that's done by the Muslim's hand," Saleem explained.
"And it’s not the just the Muslims who came to the United States for this purpose, but also those they recruited in the United States as Americans and have turned them against this country." Click here for Kamal Saleem's full story in "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption," and click here for the DVD titled "In the Red Chair."
Saleem adds by now Islam even has reached the sanctuaries of Christian churches and campuses of Christian colleges.
"Even in Christian schools today, you find Islamic history professors whose papers are done on the glory of Allah and Islam and Muhammad, right there on Christian universities," Saleem said.
The group openly recruits through various social service organizations in the U.S., including the prison system. Members live in compounds where they agree to abide by the laws of Jamaat ul-Fuqra, which are considered to be above local, state and federal authority.
U.S. authorities have probed the group for charges ranging from links to al-Qaida to laundering and funneling money into Pakistan for terrorist activities. The organization supports various terrorist groups operating in Pakistan and Kashmir, and follows Sheikh Mubarak Gilani.
He boasts of conducting "the most advanced training courses in Islamic military warfare."
The jihadist organization is thought to be responsible for nearly 50 attacks on American soil, but the U.S. government refuses to list it among foreign terrorists.
In a recruitment video captured from Gilani's "Soldiers of Allah," Gilani states in English: "We are fighting to destroy the enemy. We are dealing with evil at its roots and its roots are America."
Jamaat ul-Fuqra is thought to have been responsible for the beheading murder of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in Pakistan.
The documentary called "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." provides compelling evidence of how "Muslims of America" operates, and already has caught the attention of neighbors and local police officials.
Gilani's American headquarters is in Hancock, N.Y., where training is provided to recruits who are later sent to Pakistan for more jihadist paramilitary training, according to law enforcement authorities.
A Justice Department report to law enforcement agencies, prepared in 2006, provides a glimpse into how long Jamaat ul-Fuqra or "Muslims of America" has been operating inside the U.S.: "Over the past two decades, a terrorist group known as Jamaat ul-Fuqra, or 'Community of the Impoverished,' has been linked to multiple murders, bombings and various other felonies throughout the United States and Canada."
Gilani's "communes" are described by law enforcement as "classically structured terrorist cells."
Help spread the word! Watch the trailer for "Homegrown Jihad: Terrorist Training Camps Around the U.S." and share it with your neighbors, your local police officials and your representatives in Congress.
As WND reported, a covert visit to a Jamaat ul-Fuqra encampment in upstate New York by the Northeast Intelligence Network found neighboring residents deeply concerned about military-style training taking place there but frustrated by the lack of attention from federal authorities.
Campbell told WND the compounds raise his concern because of their proximity in Georgia to a prison, in New York to a water supply and other such circumstances.
He said the information about the camps has come from law enforcement sources, from the organization's own investigation, and, tellingly, from information from insiders who have left.
Click here to learn more. Jihadist who abandoned violence for Christianity
Kamal Saleem was trained in terror starting at age 7 at a PLO assault camp, learning to know and hate his enemies, was indoctrinated in radical Islam on his mother's knee and studied with his father how to despise Christians and Jews.
He's told his story in the book, "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption," as well as in a gripping DVD called "In the Red Chair," where he describes how he used to use his power – all of it – to change the world for Islam.
He dined with Moammar Gadhafi, his website says he served under Yasser Arafat and has Arab royalty in his family tree and he worked as a career mercenary, taking his terror activities worldwide. Ultimately, he was recruited by the Saudi royal family to infiltrate the United States with a campaign of radical Islam.
But Kamal Saleem now has renounced terrorism, adopted a home in America, found Christ and has spoken against terror and radical Islam at universities across the nation.
How could this change happen?
Actually, as he explains of his own life and its changes, it was a severe accident that broke his back and the love of a Jewish man, Jesus, that ultimately put him on the right course.
It is an amazing personal story that every Christian and every American should read: "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption."
"My car was very small and it has a T-top, so when the 18-wheeler broad-sided me, I ejected from car and landed on my head in a mud hole upside down," he recalls.
"I cried out for Allah, but Allah didn't come to save me. I cried, 'Allah where are you?'" Saleem added.
Rescuers, doctors and hospital staff then introduced him to something he had never seen. He says he was shown the unconditional love of God, something that is foreign to Islam.
"In Islam, everything is conditional. For example, in the Quran, there is not one place where Allah says 'I love my people,' not once. The word love is not mentioned in the Quran," Saleem said.
In his surgeon's house, Saleem says he was amazed by the love everyone showed to him. He also says it was in the doctor's house that he also noticed something special about Christian marriage and the treatment of women.
"Women in our (Islamic) culture are nothing. They are equal to the goat or the rug. Her purpose is to be married to her husband to give him pleasure. When a husband marries a wife, he purchases her sexual organs," Saleem said.
Saleem has a warning for the Western world: "Islam is like a cancer. It grows and expands until it eventually consumes and suffocates the host."
He says his knowledge of the Muslim Brotherhood's mission and methods compels him to warn Americans about what is happening under the radar in their own country.
"The Muslim Brotherhood is here specifically to destroy the house of the United States of America and bring about the Islamic House and that's done by the Muslim's hand," Saleem explained.
"And it’s not the just the Muslims who came to the United States for this purpose, but also those they recruited in the United States as Americans and have turned them against this country." Click here for Kamal Saleem's full story in "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption," and click here for the DVD titled "In the Red Chair."
Saleem adds by now Islam even has reached the sanctuaries of Christian churches and campuses of Christian colleges.
"Even in Christian schools today, you find Islamic history professors whose papers are done on the glory of Allah and Islam and Muhammad, right there on Christian universities," Saleem said.
"These guys are the first allies and the best allies to Islam. So, when someone speaks of Islam, they try to destroy the person's character instantly because they (the professor) have become a war machine," Saleem said.
Saleem says one of the most insidious ways jihad and Shariah law is infiltrating the U. S. is through the courts. He cites the recent Florida case in which a judge ordered Shariah law be used to settle a mosque leadership dispute.
"What they're trying to do is fake cases for Islam and these cases are done purposefully. We take an imam, there are two of them. They were fighting against each other and the fight was over a mosque," Saleem explained.
"That is so devious and it is part of the culture of Islamic invasion. These two imams are fighting over a mosque in Florida. Each imam says it belongs to me," Saleem said,
"One says I built it and I raised the funds. The other one says the Wahhabi government put me over here and they're the ones who sent the money. Both of them are right," Saleem continued.
"They went to the Supreme Court in Florida. What happened is that they said this was a Muslim matter and you need to judge us by Islamic Shariah law or you will not understand how these things work," Saleem added.
"Both of them are demanding to be judged by Shariah so now the Supreme Court is learning how Shariah works. So, in turn, they have instilled and indwelt Islamic laws with our laws," Saleem said.
Saleem says that the effort to install Shariah law into the United States should be treated like "any other act of terrorism because they are terrorizing this country."
Saleem says what's happening should be prayed against.
"That's what we need to speak against and pray against because it is the essence of evil." Saleem declared.
Read Kamal Saleem's story in the new book, "The Blood of Lambs: A Former Terrorist's Memoir of Death and Redemption," and watch him tell it firsthand in the new DVD called "In the Red Chair."
See the book
Glenn Beck raves about:
The Islamic Antichrist
The Islamic Antichrist
Glenn Beck
gave a big boost for an older WND Books product saying Americans should be
alarmed over the revelations of "The
Islamic Antichrist," in which
author Joel Richardson documents the similarities between the "bad
guy" of the Bible, the Antichrist, and the "good guy" of the
Quran, the Mahdi.
Beck's promotion drove the 2-year-old book all the way up to the top 10 spot in Amazon rankings.
The author of "The Islamic Antichrist" contends the Antichrist and the Mahdi are, in fact, the same.
"You have to look at this, really ask yourself, 'Wow, is this true?'" Beck said.
He also cited the Islamic teachings that some Muslims like Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believe – that they can speed the coming of the Madhi, their end-times savior, by creating chaos, from which they expect him to emerge.
Beck, applying such a belief to Christianity, suggested, "What do you say we go start slaughtering people so Jesus will come back."
Read it for yourself, "The Islamic Antichrist."
Richardson's book discusses his analysis of the Bible's account of the end times and that of the Quran, including his conclusions about the "Antichrist," who is described by the Bible as the ultimate enemy of God and His people, the Jews and Christians. The Mahdi, meanwhile, in Islam is forecast to be someone who comes to establish a worldwide Islamic caliphate.
Following the broadcast, the book's ranking on Amazon shot up, hitting the top 10 among all books only hours later. It was rated No. 1 in books on theology and No. 3 in books on eschatology
Beck's promotion drove the 2-year-old book all the way up to the top 10 spot in Amazon rankings.
The author of "The Islamic Antichrist" contends the Antichrist and the Mahdi are, in fact, the same.
"You have to look at this, really ask yourself, 'Wow, is this true?'" Beck said.
He also cited the Islamic teachings that some Muslims like Iran President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad believe – that they can speed the coming of the Madhi, their end-times savior, by creating chaos, from which they expect him to emerge.
Beck, applying such a belief to Christianity, suggested, "What do you say we go start slaughtering people so Jesus will come back."
Read it for yourself, "The Islamic Antichrist."
Richardson's book discusses his analysis of the Bible's account of the end times and that of the Quran, including his conclusions about the "Antichrist," who is described by the Bible as the ultimate enemy of God and His people, the Jews and Christians. The Mahdi, meanwhile, in Islam is forecast to be someone who comes to establish a worldwide Islamic caliphate.
Following the broadcast, the book's ranking on Amazon shot up, hitting the top 10 among all books only hours later. It was rated No. 1 in books on theology and No. 3 in books on eschatology
Beck cited a
number of similarities between the prophecies, that of Jesus from the Bible and
of the Mahdi in the Islamic tradition.
"You have the bad guy of the Bible, he primarily persecutes God's people, Jews and Christians," Richardson said. Meanwhile the "12th imam," or Islam's Mahdi, "causes Jews and Christians to submit to Islam or be killed."
Both prophecies call for a time of rule of 7 years, a leader of the world who makes peace with Israel, then breaks the accord, then invades Israel and kills nonbelievers, setting up a seat of government on the Temple Mount.
While the biblical Antichrist is evil personified, the culmination of antagonism to God and His word, Richardson described in a column for WND the Islamic perspective:
"The Mahdi is Islam's primary messiah figure Muslims believe will come at the end of the age to lead Islam to global dominance. Much popular discussion of Mahdism in recent years has inaccurately expressed that belief in the Mahdi is merely a Shia phenomenon. While variances in the details do exist between Sunni and Shia Muslims on this issue, belief in the Mahdi is nevertheless not reserved to one group or the other. Numerous renowned Muslim scholars, Sunni, Sufi and Shia affirm the orthodoxy of belief in the coming of the Mahdi."
Beck noted that the Mahdi story results in a character that is the "polar opposite" of the biblical prophecy, and another guest, Zuhdi Jasser, of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, agreed.
He described himself as moderate Muslim and said the belief that Muslims can speed the return of their savior is "toxic."
Richardson said, "In both stories, Jesus returns. On the biblical side, Jesus returns to deliver his people from being persecuted. On the Islamic, a Muslim Jesus tells the Christians of the world, 'You've had it wrong all along. I never said God was my father. I never died on the cross.'"
Beck played video of Ahmadinejad repeatedly saying during his speeches, "Oh God, hasten the arrival of Imam al-Madhi and grant him good health and victory."
That, Beck, said is the reason some Muslims seek chaos, and Richardson explained that is because it is from chaos they expect their Madhi to come.
Other commenters included retired Lt. Gen William G. Boykin, who said Iran's activities these days show it is "trying to establish themselves as the leader of the Islamic revolution."
And Richardson had noted in a recent WND column that when Iran launched a surface-to-surface missile, it had the words "Ya Mahdi" emblazoned on its body – the equivalent of "Go Mahdi."
Boykin noted Muslims believe their savior's return can happen only when "bloodshed and chaos" are worldwide.
"What circumstance," he questioned, would bring that about more quickly "than using nuclear weapons against the nation of Israel?"
Media Matters for America launched an immediate response, called, "Who is Joel Richardson, Beck's End Times Prophet?"
It noted that Beck's website has published writings by Richardson, and the author also appears in a new video by Beck that talks about the threat of a nuclear Iran to the U.S. and Israel.
Richardson's book also takes on the popular assumption among Christians that the Antichrist will come from a revived Roman Empire, which many have assumed is associated with the Roman Catholic Church and the European Union.
"The Bible abounds with proofs that the Antichrist's empire will consist only of nations that are, today, Islamic," Richardson explains. "Despite the numerous prevailing arguments for the emergence of a revived European Roman empire as the Antichrist's power base, the specific nations the Bible identifies as comprising his empire are today all Muslim."
Richardson believes the key error of many previous prophecy scholars involves the misinterpretation of a prediction by Daniel to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar. Daniel describes the rise and fall of empires of the future, leading to the end times. Western Christians have viewed one of those empires as Rome, when, claims Richardson, Rome never actually conquered Babylon and was thus disqualified as a possibility.
It had to be another empire that rose and fell and rose again that would lead to rule of this "man of sin," described in the Bible. That empire, he says, is the Islamic Empire, which did conquer Babylon and, in fact, rules over it even today.
Those who are unaware of the similarities of the prophecies for the Antichrist and the Mahdi will be stunned by chapters including "Islamic Eschatology," "The Sacred Texts of Islam," "Comparing the Biblical Antichrist and the Mahdi," and "The Dark Nature of Muhammad's Revelations."
The author is a human rights activist, lecturer and artist. He is also the co-author with Walid Shoebat of "God's War on Terror" and co-editor of "Why We Left Islam: Former Muslims speak out."
"You have the bad guy of the Bible, he primarily persecutes God's people, Jews and Christians," Richardson said. Meanwhile the "12th imam," or Islam's Mahdi, "causes Jews and Christians to submit to Islam or be killed."
Both prophecies call for a time of rule of 7 years, a leader of the world who makes peace with Israel, then breaks the accord, then invades Israel and kills nonbelievers, setting up a seat of government on the Temple Mount.
While the biblical Antichrist is evil personified, the culmination of antagonism to God and His word, Richardson described in a column for WND the Islamic perspective:
"The Mahdi is Islam's primary messiah figure Muslims believe will come at the end of the age to lead Islam to global dominance. Much popular discussion of Mahdism in recent years has inaccurately expressed that belief in the Mahdi is merely a Shia phenomenon. While variances in the details do exist between Sunni and Shia Muslims on this issue, belief in the Mahdi is nevertheless not reserved to one group or the other. Numerous renowned Muslim scholars, Sunni, Sufi and Shia affirm the orthodoxy of belief in the coming of the Mahdi."
Beck noted that the Mahdi story results in a character that is the "polar opposite" of the biblical prophecy, and another guest, Zuhdi Jasser, of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, agreed.
He described himself as moderate Muslim and said the belief that Muslims can speed the return of their savior is "toxic."
Richardson said, "In both stories, Jesus returns. On the biblical side, Jesus returns to deliver his people from being persecuted. On the Islamic, a Muslim Jesus tells the Christians of the world, 'You've had it wrong all along. I never said God was my father. I never died on the cross.'"
Beck played video of Ahmadinejad repeatedly saying during his speeches, "Oh God, hasten the arrival of Imam al-Madhi and grant him good health and victory."
That, Beck, said is the reason some Muslims seek chaos, and Richardson explained that is because it is from chaos they expect their Madhi to come.
Other commenters included retired Lt. Gen William G. Boykin, who said Iran's activities these days show it is "trying to establish themselves as the leader of the Islamic revolution."
And Richardson had noted in a recent WND column that when Iran launched a surface-to-surface missile, it had the words "Ya Mahdi" emblazoned on its body – the equivalent of "Go Mahdi."
Boykin noted Muslims believe their savior's return can happen only when "bloodshed and chaos" are worldwide.
"What circumstance," he questioned, would bring that about more quickly "than using nuclear weapons against the nation of Israel?"
Media Matters for America launched an immediate response, called, "Who is Joel Richardson, Beck's End Times Prophet?"
It noted that Beck's website has published writings by Richardson, and the author also appears in a new video by Beck that talks about the threat of a nuclear Iran to the U.S. and Israel.
Richardson's book also takes on the popular assumption among Christians that the Antichrist will come from a revived Roman Empire, which many have assumed is associated with the Roman Catholic Church and the European Union.
"The Bible abounds with proofs that the Antichrist's empire will consist only of nations that are, today, Islamic," Richardson explains. "Despite the numerous prevailing arguments for the emergence of a revived European Roman empire as the Antichrist's power base, the specific nations the Bible identifies as comprising his empire are today all Muslim."
Richardson believes the key error of many previous prophecy scholars involves the misinterpretation of a prediction by Daniel to Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar. Daniel describes the rise and fall of empires of the future, leading to the end times. Western Christians have viewed one of those empires as Rome, when, claims Richardson, Rome never actually conquered Babylon and was thus disqualified as a possibility.
It had to be another empire that rose and fell and rose again that would lead to rule of this "man of sin," described in the Bible. That empire, he says, is the Islamic Empire, which did conquer Babylon and, in fact, rules over it even today.
Those who are unaware of the similarities of the prophecies for the Antichrist and the Mahdi will be stunned by chapters including "Islamic Eschatology," "The Sacred Texts of Islam," "Comparing the Biblical Antichrist and the Mahdi," and "The Dark Nature of Muhammad's Revelations."
The author is a human rights activist, lecturer and artist. He is also the co-author with Walid Shoebat of "God's War on Terror" and co-editor of "Why We Left Islam: Former Muslims speak out."
John F. Kennedy vs The Federal Reserve
|
On
June 4, 1963, a virtually unknown Presidential decree, Executive Order 11110, was signed with
the authority to basically strip the Bank of its power to loan money to the
United States Federal Government at interest. With the stroke of a pen,
President Kennedy declared that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank would
soon be out of business. The Christian Law Fellowship has exhaustively
researched this matter through the Federal Register and Library of Congress. We
can now safely conclude that this Executive Order has never been repealed,
amended, or superseded by any subsequent Executive Order. In simple terms, it
is still valid.
When
President John Fitzgerald Kennedy - the author of Profiles in Courage -signed
this Order, it returned to the federal government, specifically the Treasury
Department, the Constitutional power to create and issue currency -money -
without going through the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank. President
Kennedy's Executive Order 11110 [the full text is displayed further below] gave
the Treasury Department the explicit authority: "to issue silver
certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in
the Treasury." This means that for every ounce of silver in the U.S.
Treasury's vault, the government could introduce new money into circulation
based on the silver bullion physically held there. As a result, more than $4
billion in United States Notes were brought into circulation in $2 and $5
denominations. $10 and $20 United States Notes were never circulated but were
being printed by the Treasury Department when Kennedy was assassinated. It
appears obvious that President Kennedy knew the Federal Reserve Notes being
used as the purported legal currency were contrary to the Constitution of the
United States of America.
"United
States Notes" were issued as an interest-free and debt-free currency
backed by silver reserves in the U.S. Treasury. We compared a "Federal
Reserve Note" issued from the private central bank of the United States
(the Federal Reserve Bank a/k/a Federal Reserve System), with a "United
States Note" from the U.S. Treasury issued by President Kennedy's
Executive Order. They almost look alike, except one says "Federal Reserve
Note" on the top while the other says "United States Note".
Also, the Federal Reserve Note has a green seal and serial number while the
United States Note has a red seal and serial number.
President
Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963 and the United States Notes he
had issued were immediately taken out of circulation. Federal Reserve Notes
continued to serve as the legal currency of the nation. According to the United
States Secret Service, 99% of all U.S. paper "currency" circulating
in 1999 are Federal Reserve Notes.
Kennedy
knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they
would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very
simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not
backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have
prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of
the nearly $9 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or
any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately
given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the
private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new
"money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once
again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Again,
according to our own research, just five months after Kennedy was assassinated,
no more of the Series 1958 "Silver Certificates" were issued either,
and they were subsequently removed from circulation. Perhaps the assassination
of JFK was a warning to all future presidents not to interfere with the private
Federal Reserve's control over the creation of money. It seems very apparent
that President Kennedy challenged the "powers that exist behind U.S. and
world finance". With true patriotic courage, JFK boldly faced the two most
successful vehicles that have ever been used to drive up debt:
1)
war (Viet Nam); and,
2)
the creation of money by a privately owned central bank. His efforts to have
all U.S. troops out of Vietnam by 1965 combined with Executive Order 11110
would have destroyed the profits and control of the private Federal Reserve
Bank.
Executive Order 11110
Executive Order 11110
AMENDMENT
OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN
FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY. By virtue of the authority
vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered
as follows:
SECTION
1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby
further amended - (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following
subparagraph (j): "(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph
(b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821 (b)),
to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard
silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding
silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver
certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver
currency for their redemption," and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and
(c) of paragraph 2 thereof. SECTION 2. The amendment made by this Order shall
not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or
proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of
this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if
said amendments had not been made.
JOHN
F. KENNEDY THE WHITE HOUSE, June 4, 1963
Once again, Executive Order 11110 is still valid. According to Title 3, United States Code, Section 301 dated January 26, 1998:
Executive
Order (EO) 10289 dated Sept. 17, 1951, 16 F.R. 9499, was as amended by:
EO
10583, dated December 18, 1954, 19 F.R. 8725;
EO
10882 dated July 18, 1960, 25 F.R. 6869;
EO
11110 dated June 4, 1963, 28 F.R. 5605;
EO
11825 dated December 31, 1974, 40 F.R. 1003;
EO
12608 dated September 9, 1987, 52 F.R. 34617
The
1974 and 1987 amendments, added after Kennedy's 1963 amendment, did not change
or alter any part of Kennedy's EO 11110. A search of Clinton's 1998 and 1999
EO's and Presidential Directives has also shown no reference to any
alterations, suspensions, or changes to EO 11110.
The
Federal Reserve Bank, a.k.a Federal Reserve System, is a Private Corporation.
Black's Law Dictionary defines the "Federal Reserve System" as:
"Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and
to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment
of stock and minimum reserves." Privately-owned banks own the stock of the
FED. This was explained in more detail in the case of Lewis v. United States, Federal
Reporter, 2nd Series, Vol. 680, Pages 1239, 1241 (1982), where the court said:
"Each Federal Reserve Bank is a separate corporation owned by commercial
banks in its region. The stock-holding commercial banks elect two thirds of
each Bank's nine member board of directors".
The
Federal Reserve Banks are locally controlled by their member banks. Once again,
according to Black's Law Dictionary, we find that these privately owned banks
actually issue money:
"Federal
Reserve Act. Law which created Federal Reserve banks which act as agents in
maintaining money reserves, issuing money in the form of bank notes, lending
money to banks, and supervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board
(q.v.)".
The
privately owned Federal Reserve (FED) banks actually issue (create) the
"money" we use. In 1964, the House Committee on Banking and Currency,
Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, at the second session of the 88th Congress,
put out a study entitled Money Facts which contains a good description of what
the FED is: "The Federal Reserve is a total money-making machine. It can
issue money or checks. And it never has a problem of making its checks good
because it can obtain the $5 and $10 bills necessary to cover its check simply
by asking the Treasury Department's Bureau of Engraving to print them".
Any
one person or any closely knit group who has a lot of money has a lot of power.
Now imagine a group of people who have the power to create money. Imagine the
power these people would have. This is exactly what the privately owned FED is!
No
man did more to expose the power of the FED than Louis T. McFadden, who was the
Chairman of the House Banking Committee back in the 1930s. In describing the
FED, he remarked in the Congressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June
10, 1932:
"Mr.
Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the
world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal
reserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheated the
Government of the United States and he people of the United States out of
enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities of
the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal reserve banks acting together have
cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over.
This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United
States; has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.
It has done this through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal
Reserve Board, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who
control it".
Some
people think the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government
institutions. They are not Government institutions, departments, or agencies.
They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United
States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. Those 12
private credit monopolies were deceitfully placed upon this country by bankers
who came here from Europe and who repaid us for our hospitality by undermining
our American institutions.
The
FED basically works like this: The government granted its power to create money
to the FED banks. They create money, then loan it back to the government
charging interest. The government levies income taxes to pay the interest on
the debt. On this point, it's interesting to note that the Federal Reserve Act
and the sixteenth amendment, which gave congress the power to collect income
taxes, were both passed in 1913. The incredible power of the FED over the
economy is universally admitted. Some people, especially in the banking and
academic communities, even support it. On the other hand, there are those, such
as President John Fitzgerald Kennedy, that have spoken out against it. His
efforts were spoken about in Jim Marrs' 1990 book Crossfire:"
Another
overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American society involves
money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which
states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national
debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal
Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at
interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order
11110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes
through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System.
That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar
bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy's
comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful
Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending
powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also
had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general
obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks".
In
a comment made to a Columbia University class on Nov. 12, 1963,
Ten
days before his assassination, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy allegedly
said:
"The
high office of the President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the
American's freedom and before I leave office, I must inform the citizen of this
plight."
In
this matter, John Fitzgerald Kennedy appears to be the subject of his own
book... a true Profile of Courage.
This research report was compiled for
Lawgiver. Org. by Anthony Wayne
What
is the Federal Reserve Bank?
What
is the Federal Reserve Bank (FED) and why do we have it?
by
Greg Hobbs November 1, 1999
The
FED is a central bank. Central banks are supposed to implement a country's
fiscal policies. They monitor commercial banks to ensure that they maintain
sufficient assets, like cash, so as to remain solvent and stable. Central banks
also do business, such as currency exchanges and gold transactions, with other
central banks. In theory, a central bank should be good for a country, and they
might be if it wasn't for the fact that they are not owned or controlled by the
government of the country they are serving. Private central banks, including
our FED, operate not in the interest of the public good but for profit.
There
have been three central banks in our nation's history. The first two, while
deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud
being perpetrated by our current FED. What they all have in common is an
insidious practice known as "fractional banking."
Fractional
banking or fractional lending is the ability to create money from nothing, lend
it to the government or someone else and charge interest to boot. The practice
evolved before banks existed. Goldsmiths rented out space in their vaults to
individuals and merchants for storage of their gold or silver. The goldsmiths
gave these "depositors" a certificate that showed the amount of gold
stored. These certificates were then used to conduct business.
In
time the goldsmiths noticed that the gold in their vaults was rarely withdrawn.
Small amounts would move in and out but the large majority never moved. Sensing
a profit opportunity, the goldsmiths issued double receipts for the gold, in
effect creating money (certificates) from nothing and then lending those
certificates (creating debt) to depositors and charging them interest as well.
Since
the certificates represented more gold than actually existed, the certificates
were "fractionally" backed by gold. Eventually some of these vault
operations were transformed into banks and the practice of fractional banking
continued.
Keep
that fractional banking concept in mind as we examine our first central bank,
the First Bank of the United States (BUS). It was created, after bitter dissent
in the Congress, in 1791 and chartered for 20 years. A scam not unlike the
current FED, the BUS used its control of the currency to defraud the public and
establish a legal form of usury.
This
bank practiced fractional lending at a 10:1 rate, ten dollars of loans for each
dollar they had on deposit. This misuse and abuse of their public charter
continued for the entire 20 years of their existence. Public outrage over these
abuses was such that the charter was not renewed and the bank ceased to exist
in 1811.
The
war of 1812 left the country in economic chaos, seen by bankers as another
opportunity for easy profits. They influenced Congress to charter the second
central bank, the Second Bank of the United States (SBUS), in 1816.
The
SBUS was more expansive than the BUS. The SBUS sold franchises and literally
doubled the number of banks in a short period of time. The country began to
boom and move westward, which required money. Using fractional lending at the
10:1 rate, the central bank and their franchisees created the debt/money for
the expansion.
Things
boomed for a while, then the banks decided to shut off the debt/money, citing
the need to control inflation. This action on the part of the SBUS caused
bankruptcies and foreclosures. The banks then took control of the assets that
were used as security against the loans.
Closely
examine how the SBUS engineered this cycle of prosperity and depression. The
central bank caused inflation by creating debt/money for loans and credit and
making these funds readily available. The economy boomed. Then they used the
inflation which they created as an excuse to shut off the loans/credit/money.
The
resulting shortage of cash caused the economy to falter or slow dramatically
and large numbers of business and personal bankruptcies resulted. The central
bank then seized the assets used as security for the loans. The wealth created
by the borrowers during the boom was then transferred to the central bank
during the bust. And you always wondered how the big guys ended up with all the
marbles.
Now,
who do you think is responsible for all of the ups and downs in our economy
over the last 85 years? Think about the depression of the late '20s and all
through the '30s. The FED could have pumped lots of debt/money into the market
to stimulate the economy and get the country back on track, but did they? No;
in fact, they restricted the money supply quite severely. We all know the
results that occurred from that action, don't we?
Why
would the FED do this? During that period asset values and stocks were at rock
bottom prices. Who do you think was buying everything at 10 cents on the
dollar? I believe that it is referred to as consolidating the wealth. How many
times have they already done this in the last 85 years?
Do
you think they will do it again?
Just
as an aside at this point, look at today's economy. Markets are declining. Why?
Because the FED has been very liberal with its debt/credit/money. The market
was hyper inflated. Who creates inflation? The FED. How does the FED deal with
inflation? They restrict the debt/credit/money. What happens when they do that?
The market collapses.
Several
months back, after certain central banks said they would be selling large
quantities of gold, the price of gold fell to a 25-year low of about $260 per
ounce. The central banks then bought gold. After buying at the bottom, a group
of 15 central banks announced that they would be restricting the amount of gold
released into the market for the next five years. The price of gold went up
$75.00 per ounce in just a few days. How many hundreds of billions of dollars
did the central banks make with those two press releases?
Gold
is generally considered to be a hedge against more severe economic conditions.
Do you think that the private banking families that own the FED are buying or
selling equities at this time? (Remember: buy low, sell high.) How much money
do you think these FED owners have made since they restricted the money supply
at the top of this last current cycle?
Alan
Greenspan has said publicly on several occasions that he thinks the market is
overvalued, or words to that effect. Just a hint that he will raise interest
rates (restrict the money supply), and equity markets have a negative reaction.
Governments and politicians do not rule central banks, central banks rule
governments and politicians. President Andrew Jackson won the presidency in
1828 with the promise to end the national debt and eliminate the SBUS. During
his second term President Jackson withdrew all government funds from the bank
and on January 8, 1835, paid off the national debt. He is the only president in
history to have this distinction. The charter of the SBUS expired in 1836.
Without
a central bank to manipulate the supply of money, the United States experienced
unprecedented growth for 60 or 70 years, and the resulting wealth was too much
for bankers to endure. They had to get back into the game. So, in 1910 Senator
Nelson Aldrich, then Chairman of the National Monetary Commission, in collusion
with representatives of the European central banks, devised a plan to pressure
and deceive Congress into enacting legislation that would covertly establish a
private central bank.
This
bank would assume control over the American economy by controlling the issuance
of its money. After a huge public relations campaign, engineered by the foreign
central banks, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was slipped through Congress
during the Christmas recess, with many members of the Congress absent.
President Woodrow Wilson, pressured by his political and financial backers,
signed it on December 23, 1913.
The
act created the Federal Reserve System, a name carefully selected and designed
to deceive. "Federal" would lead one to believe that this is a
government organization. "Reserve" would lead one to believe that the
currency is being backed by gold and silver. "System" was used in
lieu of the word "bank" so that one would not conclude that a new
central bank had been created.
In
reality, the act created a private, for profit, central banking corporation
owned by a cartel of private banks. Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London
and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb
and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the
Rockefeller families of New York.
Did
you know that the FED is the only for-profit corporation in America that is
exempt from both federal and state taxes? The FED takes in about one trillion
dollars per year tax free! The banking families listed above get all that
money.
Almost
everyone thinks that the money they pay in taxes goes to the US Treasury to pay
for the expenses of the government. Do you want to know where your tax dollars
really go? If you look at the back of any check made payable to the IRS you
will see that it has been endorsed as "Pay Any F.R.B. Branch or Gen.
Depository for Credit U.S. Treas. This is in Payment of U.S. Oblig." Yes,
that's right, every dime you pay in income taxes is given to those private
banking families, commonly known as the FED, tax free.
Like
many of you, I had some difficulty with the concept of creating money from
nothing. You may have heard the term "monetizing the debt," which is
kind of the same thing. As an example, if the US Government wants to borrow $1
million ó the government does borrow every dollar it spends ó they go to the
FED to borrow the money. The FED calls the Treasury and says print 10,000
Federal Reserve Notes (FRN) in units of one hundred dollars.
The
Treasury charges the FED 2.3 cents for each note, for a total of $230 for the
10,000 FRNs. The FED then lends the $1 million to the government at face value
plus interest. To add insult to injury, the government has to create a bond for
$1 million as security for the loan. And the rich get richer. The above was
just an example, because in reality the FED does not even print the money; it's
just a computer entry in their accounting system. To put this on a more
personal level, let's use another example.
Today's
banks are members of the Federal Reserve Banking System. This membership makes
it legal for them to create money from nothing and lend it to you. Today's
banks, like the goldsmiths of old, realize that only a small fraction of the
money deposited in their banks is ever actually withdrawn in the form of cash.
Only about 4 percent of all the money that exists is in the form of currency.
The rest of it is simply a computer entry.
Let's
say you're approved to borrow $10,000 to do some home improvements. You know
that the bank didn't actually take $10,000 from its pile of cash and put it
into your pile? They simply went to their computer and input an entry of
$10,000 into your account. They created, from thin air, a debt which you have
to secure with an asset and repay with interest. The bank is allowed to create
and lend as much debt as they want as long as they do not exceed the 10:1 ratio
imposed by the FED.
It
sort of puts a new slant on how you view your friendly bank, doesn't it? How
about those loan committees that scrutinize you with a microscope before
approving the loan they created from thin air. What a hoot! They make it
complex for a reason. They don't want you to understand what they are doing.
People fear what they do not understand. You are easier to delude and control
when you are ignorant and afraid.
Now
to put the frosting on this cake. When was the income tax created? If you
guessed 1913, the same year that the FED was created, you get a gold star.
Coincidence? What are the odds? If you are going to use the FED to create debt,
who is going to repay that debt? The income tax was created to complete the
illusion that real money had been lent and therefore real money had to be
repaid. And you thought Houdini was good.
So,
what can be done? My father taught me that you should always stand up for what
is right, even if you have to stand up alone.
If
"We the People" don't take some action now, there may come a time
when "We the People" are no more. You should write a letter or send
an email to each of your elected representatives. Many of our elected
representatives do not understand the FED. Once informed they will not be able
to plead ignorance and remain silent.
Article
1, Section 8 of the US Constitution specifically says that Congress is the only
body that can "coin money and regulate the value thereof." The US
Constitution has never been amended to allow anyone other than Congress to coin
and regulate currency.
Ask
your representative, in light of that information, how it is possible for the
Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and the Federal Reserve Bank that it created, to
be constitutional. Ask them why this private banking cartel is allowed to reap
trillions of dollars in profits without paying taxes. Insist on an answer.
Thomas
Jefferson said, "If the America people ever allow private banks to control
the issuance of their currencies, first by inflation and then by deflation, the
banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of
all their prosperity until their children will wake up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered."
Jefferson
saw it coming 150 years ago. The question is, "Can you now see what is in
store for us if we allow the FED to continue controlling our country?"
"The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he breaks, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime, and the punishment of his guilt."
John P. Curran
Source: http://www.roc-grp.org/jfk.html
. “EN MI OPINION”.
”Freedon
is never Free” Editor Lázaro R González Miño .
No comments:
Post a Comment