No 1016 “En mi opinión” Agosto 5, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño Editor
Lázaro R González para Alcalde del Condado de Miami
AMENPER: Que pienso de Donald Trump ?
|
|
¿Que
pienso de Donald Trump ?
Creo
que lo que mejor puede determinar lo que Donald Trump ha representado a la
campaña presidencial del partido republicano es su posición en las encuestas,
que representa el apoyo de los votantes a las posiciones de Trump.
Este
es un mensaje que los demás candidatos deben de imitar, no criticar.
"Donald
Trump tiene nombre fuerte reconocimiento y la capacidad de auto financiar su
campaña por tiempo indefinido. Esas cualidades lo hacen viable," dice
Harry Wilson, profesor de asuntos públicos y director del Instituto de
investigación en políticas y opinión en el Roanoke Collage, en Salem, Virginia
Pero
el dinero y la visibilidad no son suficiente, es el mensaje lo que le ha traído
el éxito en la campaña.
Pero
no sólo denunciar la verdad es la solución, eso lo tienen que recordar los que
apoyaron incondicionalmente y sin cuestionar su capacidad a un joven líder
carismático que denunció la verdad violentamente contra la dictadura de
Batista. Necesitamos a un con la capacidad política y el mensaje
de Trump y la capacidad y experiencia
política para ser el próximo presidente.
Los
que vivimos la experiencia de las elecciones de 1992, cuando un carismático
empresario millonario fue como independiente y recibió el 19% de los votos
causando la victoria de Bill Clinton sobre George H Bush que comenzó la hegemonía
de la maquinaria demócrata que vivimos hoy en día.
Ross
Perot logró Bush lograra la nominación a pesar de su impopularidad por
haber subido los impuestos,al dividir el campo como ahora
Trump y luego causó su derrota en las
elecciones generales al volver a dividir el campo.
Tengo
miedo que la historia se repita, tenemos que aprender de las experiencias, tal
parece que cuando se calmen las aguas el beneficiado de la campaña de Trump
pudiera ser Jeb Bush.
Bush
es el único candidato que ha subido en las encuestas desde la entrada de Trump,
saltando por unos cuatro puntos porcentuales en el promedio de todas las
encuestas, al 15.5 por ciento.
Trump
ha robado su posición no de Jeb Bush pero de los que tienen una posición
parecida a la suya pero han sido demasiado blandos al expresarlas, otros
aspirantes a estrellas de GOP como el gobernador Scott Walker el senador de
Florida Marco Rubio, senador de Kentucky Rand Paul el senador de Texas Ted Cruz
y el ex gobernador de Arkansas Mike Huckabee, todos se han hundido
significativamente en las encuestas desde que Trump asumió el triunfo y el
centro de atención, mientras Bush se ha mantenido igual..
Mi
opinión, estoy de acuerdo con lo que dice Trump, pero no veo como la nación
pudiera estar mejor con Trump, o Hillary Clinton de presidente que con Scott
Walker.
No
quisiera vivir esta pesadilla del 1992
Google Translate. LRGM:
AMENPER: I
think of Donald Trump?What do I think of Donald Trump?
I think what can best determine what Donald Trump has represented the Republican Party presidential campaign is his standing in the polls, which represents the support of voters positions Trump.
This is a message that the other candidates must imitate, not criticize.
"Donald Trump has strong name recognition and the ability to self finance his campaign indefinitely. These qualities make it feasible," says Harry Wilson, a professor of public affairs and director of the Institute for policy research and opinion in the Roanoke College in Salem, Virginia
But money and visibility are not enough, it is the message that has brought him success in the campaign.
But not only denounce the truth is the solution, that I have to remember those who supported unconditionally and without question his capacity to a young charismatic leader who denounced the truth violently against the Batista dictatorship. We need a policy with the capacity and the Trump message and the ability and political experience to be the next president.
Those who live the experience of the 1992 elections, when a charismatic millionaire businessman was as an independent and received 19% of the votes causing the victory of Bill Clinton on George H Bush began the hegemony of the Democratic machine that we live today .
Ross Perot won the nomination Bush succeeded despite its unpopularity for having raised taxes by splitting the field and now Trump and then caused his defeat in the general elections to re-divide the field.
I fear that history will repeat itself, we have to learn from the experience, it appears that when the waters subside the campaign benefited from Trump could be Jeb Bush.
Bush is the only candidate who has risen in the polls from the entrance of Trump, jumping by about four percentage points in the average of all polls, at 15.5 percent.
Trump has stolen his position not of Jeb Bush but which have a similar position to yours but have been too soft to express, other starlets GOP Gov. Scott Walker as Florida Senator Marco Rubio, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul Texas Senator Ted Cruz and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, all have sunk significantly in the polls since Trump triumph and took the spotlight, as Bush has remained the same ..
My opinion, I agree with what he says Trump, but do not see how the nation could be better with Trump, President Clinton or Hillary Scott Walker.
I would not want to live this nightmare of 1992
JUAN A MOLERIO: Análisis sobre Donald Trump
Donald Trump, un hombre netamente de negocios. Supo multiplicar su
fortuna después de la muerte de su padre y se vale de cualquier artimaña (en
donaciones) para lograrlo.
Trump le ha donado miles de dólares a Harry Reid, Rahm Emanuel,
Hillary Clinton, Jhon Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Charles Rangel, y 125, 000 dólares al
partido Demócrata. ¿Lo ha hecho para su beneficio personal o por simpatizar con
ellos? De cualquiera de las dos formas, no aparenta ser un político genuino.
Por videos y noticias, Trump ha sido muy amigo de Hillary. En el 2008,
al no ganar la presidencia Hillary, se suponia que aspiraría al terminar el
mandato de Obama. En el 2009, Trump se pasa del partido Demócrata al
Republicano. ¿Con qué idea? ( ? ) Aunque parece energico y conceptos algo
reales, no están dicha de la mejor forma. ¿Por qué en esa forma? (? ) La prensa
solo escribe sobre su popularid y no tienen en cuenta la variedad de buenos
candidatos que tenemos. El divide y no es capaz de unir criterios, por tanto no
es un candidato conservador confiable.
Con su discurso ofensivo a los mexicanos y a Mc Cain, ha perdido
múltiples de contratos y la prensa lo tiene en las principales noticia por su
forma despectivas con los demás. En estos momento le interesa mas la fama, que
perder cierta cantidad de dinero (tal vez piensa que lo recuperará, si Hillary
es Presidente). Como un dicho que dice: "No importa que hablen bien o mal,
el caso es que hablen".
Como ha demostrado que no es un tonto (aunque sí útil), el sabe el
daño que le está haciendo al partido Republicano. Aún faltan muchos meses para
las primarias, y cometerá otras sorpresas favorables al partido Demócrata y en
contra del partido Republicano. ¿El alma de Donald Trump, a favor de quién
está? El partido Republicano tendrá que luchar contra un enemigo (Donald Trump)
y un contrario. ¡Qué tarea!
Juan A. Molerio
Miami
Google translate. LRGM
JUAN A Molerio: Analysis of Donald Trump
Donald Trump, a man purely business. He knew how
to multiply his fortune after the death of his father and uses any trick (in
grants) to achieve this.
Trump has donated thousands of dollars to Harry
Reid, Rahm Emanuel, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Charles Rangel,
and 125, 000 US dollars to the Democratic party. What he has done for personal
gain or for sympathizing with them? In either form, there appears to be a
genuine political.
For videos and news, Trump has been a close
friend of Hillary. In 2008, not Hillary win the presidency, he was supposed to
aspire to end the mandate of Obama. In 2009, Trump spends the Democratic Party
to the Republican. What idea? (?) Although it appears energetic and some actual
concepts that are not in the best way. Why in this way? (?) The press only
writes about his popularid and do not take into account the variety of good
candidates that we have. The divided and unable to unite criteria, so it is not
a reliable conservative candidate.
With his offensive speech to Mexican and McCain,
he has lost many contracts and the press in the major news for his derogatory
other way. At this moment more interested in fame, to lose some money (maybe
you think he will recover, if Hillary is president). As a saying: "No
matter who speak right or wrong, the fact is they speak."
As has shown that it is not a fool (though
useful), he knows the damage he is doing to the Republican Party. There are
still many months to the primary, and commit other pro-Democratic party and the
Republican party against surprises. The soul of Donald Trump, who is in favor?
The Republican Party will have to fight an enemy (Donald Trump) and a counter. What a task!
Juan A. Molerio
Miami
|
Fariña’s commitment to ‘success’ is
failing our students
August 3, 2015 | 10:58pm
‘Raising the success rate of our students is the only goal,” said Carmen
Fariña the day then-Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio announced that she would head
New York City’s 1.1 million-student public-school system.
One way or another, she might’ve added!.......Because Susan Edelman,
Carl Campanile and other Post reporters keep digging up flagrant proof of fraud
at school after school.
Whether it’s the rigging of Regents
test scores at Automotive HS in Brooklyn or retroactively “rescoring”
test outcomes at Richmond Hills HS in Queens, or giving flunking students “online
credit” at Flushing HS in Queens, or flat-out handing a pass to a student who
didn’t even bother to attend class at William Cullen Bryant HS in Queens, it all
adds up to the same thing.
Carmen Fariña is dedicated to the appearance of success, if not its
achievement.
Fariña’s direct, personal culpability in the test-fixing shenanigans
that Edelman and Campanile have so ably reported over the past several weeks no
doubt is minimal.
But responsibility for the scandal is hers, and Mayor de Blasio’s, and
they must answer for it.
Fat chance that either will recognize it, though.
That’s because each is totally invested in public education the way it
used to be, before Mayor Mike Bloomberg bludgeoned Albany into granting him
substantial — if not total — operational control of the system.
Reform followed — glacially, perhaps, and incompletely.
But it was real.
From 2005 to 2013, the city’s four-year-high-school graduation rate
jumped by more than 40 percent, while its dropout rate halved — imperfect
metrics, perhaps, but telling nevertheless.
And when Albany toughened its performance tests four years ago, scores
in New York City dropped — but not nearly as sharply as in other urban school
systems in the state.
Nevertheless, de Blasio & Co. have never missed an opportunity to
criticize the Bloomberg reforms — and to promise to reverse them.
That’s because those reforms profoundly threaten the chief impediment to
positive public-school change in New York City: the United Federation of
Teachers.
Bloomberg championed teacher accountability, as measured by student
performance, as well as alternatives to the old ways — in particular, charter
schools.
Fariña, whose grandmotherly public demeanor masks startling private
bluntness, is coy about accountability — promising to “take the temperature
down around testing.”
Translation: We want no part of accountability testing.
Neither is she interested in charter schools — except to throttle their
growth.
That’s to be expected from someone with more than four decades invested
in the old ways — a former teacher who worked her way through the ranks all the
way to a brief stint as a deputy schools chancellor in the Bloomberg years.
That the Bloomberg gig was a bad fit regarding reform is underscored by
Fariña’s long policy association with bitterly anti-reform activist Diane
Ravitch — said to wield substantial influence at the Department of Education
now.
Then there is UFT President Michael Mulgrew’s enthusiasm for Fariña.
“Carmen is a real educator. She has a deep knowledge of schools and our system
and is on record criticizing Mayor Bloomberg’s focus on high-stakes testing,”
he said at her appointment. “We look forward to working with her.”
So far, the association has been a winner for the union, which quickly
secured a multiyear contract so lavish the raises alone won’t fully be paid for
until 2020.
The mayor, of course, is mainly responsible for that lopsided contract.
But it was just ducky with Fariña, the ostensible manager who got no management
reforms whatsoever in return for the pay hikes.
But why would she want them? Who needs management prerogatives when the
union is running the show anyway?
De Blasio is still smoldering at his rough treatment by Gov. Cuomo and
the Legislature last month — especially over Albany’s refusal to grant him
full, unfettered control over the schools.
So far, the mayor has done little to earn that sort of power — again,
essentially aligning himself with the UFT and other anti-reform elements.
Nothing dramatizes that more than his hiring of Carmen Fariña in the
first place — just as nothing will demonstrate his continuing unfitness to run
the schools more clearly than permitting her to sweep the fraudulent-graduation
scandals off into a corner.
It may not seem so to de Blasio, but he has another credibility crisis
on his hands.
|
WND: Looming White House Financial
Crisis Could Erupt In 2015? 08.05.2015 by Mike Palmer, Stansberry Research
No one believed Porter Stansberry six years ago.
As head of one of America’s largest independent
financial research firms, Mr. Stansberry’s work back in 2008 led him to a
bold, but worrisome, conclusion:
That the world’s largest mortgage bankers–Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac, which at the time were responsible for nearly 50% of all the
mortgages in America–would soon go bankrupt.
In fact, in June of 2008, while their stock prices
were still trading at well over $20 per share, Stansberry published a report
to his customers titled: “Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Are Going to Zero.”
Inside this report, Stansberry explained:
“For those of you who don’t work in the financial
industry, it might be hard for you to immediately grasp what’s so dangerous
about the extreme amount of leverage employed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Let me explain exactly what Fannie and Freddie do and why they’re in so much
jeopardy…”
We all know what happened next.
Both agencies went bust–and if not for a bailout
from the Federal Government, both would have declared bankruptcy.
Barron’s–America’s second biggest financial newspaper–even
wrote a story about Mr. Stansberry’s accurate prediction short, and called it
“remarkably prescient.”
Over the years, Mr. Stansberry has made a name for
himself by accurately predicting the biggest and most important collapses in
America.
A few of the others he’s accurately identified well
in advance include: General Motors, General Growth Property (America’s biggest
mall owner), D.R. Horton (a homebuilder), and Gannett newspapers, to name
just a few.
Stansberry also predicted the recent collapse of oil
and natural gas prices as early as 2010, when he wrote a report titled: “Peak
Oil is a Flat Lie.”
Well, now Mr. Stansberry has issued another
fascinating warning, about a new and looming bankruptcy.
As Mr. Stansberry writes:
“No one believed me years ago when I said the
world’s largest mortgage bankers would soon go bankrupt.
And no one believed me when I said GM would fall
apart… or that the same would happen to General Growth Properties.
But that’s exactly what happened.”
And, he says, that brings us today…
Stansberry says the next big bankruptcy in America will be even bigger
than those he’s identified in the past. In fact, he says this looming
bankruptcy will threaten your way of life, whether you own any investments
related to it or not.
This collapse, says Stansberry, will change
everything about our normal way of life: where you vacation… where you send
your kids or grandkids to school… how and where you shop… the way you protect
your family and home.
I strongly encourage you to check out Mr.
Stansberry’s recent write-up on this situation.
|
Exclusive
Newsmax Poll: Trumps Surges, Walker Slips in South
An exclusive Newsmax poll released Tuesday shows businessman Donald Trump sweeping
to a commanding lead among Republican presidential candidates across the South,
with retired pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson surging in popularity.
Trump, who has led in the polls since his campaign
began on June
16, finished with 28 points in the exclusive
Newsmax-Southern Political Report Survey conducted by OpinionSavvy.
The billionaire developer leads all other candidates
from the region, including former southern Govs. Jeb Bush (Florida) and Mike
Huckabee (Arkansas), current Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Sens. Lindsey
Graham (South Carolina), Ted Cruz (Texas), Marco Rubio (Florida) and Rand Paul
(Kentucky).
The Atlanta-based OpinionSavvy research firm surveyed
5,728 adults in 12 Southern states on Sunday and Monday, and
its results have a margin of error of 1.3 percent.
Bush finished in a familiar second place with 18
percent. Carson is third with 10 percent. The remaining 14 GOP contenders ended
in single digits.
The Newsmax poll results contrast with Trump's national
showing of 24 percent in the Real Clear Politics average of polls, versus 13
percent for Bush and 11 percent for Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker.
In that ranking, Carson is tied with former Arkansas
Gov. Mike Huckabee at 7 percent each.
"This is not a pretend candidacy," Matt
Towery, the pollster and CEO of InsiderAdvantage, which owns OpinionSavvy, said
of Trump's White House run. "This is not something to be mocked.
"This guy is for real. He has hit something big
time in this region of the country," Towery said. "I've not seen
anyone have this sort of effect — to be quite blunt — since Ronald
Reagan."
"I don’t recall anyone having a lead this far
out," he told Newsmax. "It was building, not simply sitting there —
particularly that was so regionally strong."
The exclusive Newsmax poll results come as Trump leads
the field heading into the first Republican presidential debate with the 10
top-polling candidates on Thursday at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland.
Seven others will square off in a one-hour forum to be held before the
prime-time event.
The debate is sponsored by Fox News Channel and the
Republican National Committee. Fox averaged five national polls of GOP primary
voters, including Real Clear Politics, to make its selection.
"Many of the upper-tier candidates are from the
South, yet Donald Trump is doing better in this poll of the South than he is
doing nationally," Towery said.
Here are the other GOP candidates fared in the Newsmax
poll:
· Cruz: 9 percent
· Huckabee
and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker: 6 percent
· Rubio: 4 percent
· Ohio Gov. John Kasich: 3 percent
· Jindal,
Paul, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, and former Hewlett-Packard Co. CEO Carly Fiorina: 2 percent
· Graham,
former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, and former Texas Gov. Rick Perry: 1 percent
· Former
New York Gov. George Pataki finished below 1 percent
In addition, 2 percent responded that they would vote
for someone else, while 3 percent said they were undecided.
The Newsmax results reflected poor name recognition
for Walker in the South, Towery said.
The second-term governor has regularly followed Trump
and Bush in national polls — and he won a match-up against Democratic
front-runner Hillary Clinton in New Hampshire last month, according to a
Dartmouth College poll.
And only last week did Trump supplant Walker in Iowa
in a Gravis Marketing survey for the One American News Network. Iowa holds its
caucuses on Feb.
1, in the first contest of the 2016 presidential cycle.
"He's not well known — and a lot of this has to
do with name ID right now," Towery told Newsmax of the Badger State
governor. "He's known to people who are active in political circles, but
to the average voter in a Republican primary in these Southern states, they've
hardly ever heard of Scott Walker.
"He has a long way to go — and with Trump
dominating the headlines, he's not able to get much traction," the
pollster added. "It doesn't mean that Walker couldn't have stronger
numbers down the road, it's simply not being able to get his name known enough
right now."
While Iowa and New Hampshire are also critical for
Trump, victories in the South could send him sailing into the Florida primary
on March
15 if he
doesn’t win in those states, Towery said.
"If Trump can just stay in the game in Iowa and
New Hampshire, then he goes into South Carolina and some of the other states
and he keeps moving, he would be competitive with Bush and Carson."
The Southern states are especially critical in this
Republican presidential season, as many will hold their primaries before
Florida's. In the past, Florida held its primary earlier in the season.
This cycle, however, 14 mostly Southern states will
hold primaries between South Carolina's, on Feb.
20, and Florida's.
They are Arkansas, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Tennessee,
Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Louisiana, Alabama, Idaho, Mississippi, and Michigan.
Colorado and Hawaii will hold caucuses during the period.
Seven of those Southern primaries are part of the
first "Super Tuesday" onMarch
1.
The change will have a huge effect on the race, most
likely favoring popular candidates over establishment choices. Florida also has
held a "winner-take-all" primary, with all of its 99 delegates going
to the winner.
A Trump win in the Sunshine State could readily sink
the Bush and Rubio campaigns, since they would be losing in their home state,
Towery told Newsmax.
But this strong Southern showing poses two challenges
for the businessman, he said.
"If Trump can hold or build on that lead in the
South, he is going to go to the big dance, as they say in 'March Madness'
terms," Towery said.
Also, "can he transfer this popularity to
non-Southern states where he is running a little bit lower, like Iowa and New
Hampshire? If he can get his numbers up to the mid-30s, then he can really blow
the doors off this thing.
"Trump's running in the mid-20s nationally, 30s
and above in a lot of these Southern states," Towery concluded. "He's
the winner right now in the first run for the heart and soul of the South.
"I'm sure that if anyone told Donald Trump years
ago that Mr. New York City would be so popular in Alabama, he would've believed
it. I
wouldn't."
©
2015 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Wow: Senator
Catches Obama Red-Handed Violating The Law He JUST Signed
"That is one of
the most mind-blowingly stupid things I can ever remember."
The Iran Nuclear Agreement Review
Act specifically provides that Congress must receive “all
nuclear agreement documents, including any related to agreements ‘entered into
or made between Iran and any other parties.’ It expressly includes ‘side
agreements.’ This requirement is not strictly limited to agreements to which
the U.S. is a signatory,” Sen. Cotton and Rep. Mike Pompeo wrote in a joint
op-ed in the Wall Street Journal last week.
RELATED
STORIES
Cotton and Pompeo
recount that they traveled to Vienna a few weeks ago to meet with officials of
the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). There, they learned “that
certain elements of this deal are—and will remain—secret.” They further
discovered that those involved with the talks, including the Obama
administration, specially allowed the IAEA and Iran to have two side deals.
The first has to do
with the IAEA’s inspection of the controversial Parchin military complex. The
site is a suspected location of Iran’s long range missile and nuclear
development. The second side deal has to do with what the nation must reveal
about its nuclear program to date.
The legislators argue
that both are vital issues if the deal will have any chance of success. They
also make clear that the administration has been inconsistent in its responses
regarding the existence of these agreements and whether Congress will have
access to review them.
TRENDING
STORIES
The two sent a letter to the Obama administration requesting access to all relevant
information, so the agreement can be adequately reviewed.
To ensure there is
enough time for this review, Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, introduced a resolution
last Thursday calling for the clock to not start until all relevant “side
deals” are made available to Congress, according toThe Hill.
His resolution reads,
in part:
The 60-calendar day
period for review of such agreement in the Senate cannot be considered to have
begun until the Majority Leader certifies that all of the materials required to
be transmitted under the definition of the term ‘agreement’ under such Act,
including any side agreements with Iran and United States Government-issued
guidance materials in relation to Iran, have been transmitted to the Majority
Leader.
Dan Calabrese, writing for CainTV, called into
question the whole premise of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, noting it
runs contrary to the Constitution. Congress has a way to approve treaties–and
it is not by majority vote in both Houses, which the president can veto. “It’s
called treaty ratification, and it requires two-thirds of the Senate. For
congressional Republicans to give Obama an alternative [only requiring him to
sustain a veto] to that is one of the most mind-blowingly stupid things I
can ever remember them doing. And
that’s saying something.”
Do you believe the Iranian nuclear deal should have to go through the
normal treaty ratification process? Please
leave your thoughts below.
Bebés abortados: "por piezas podemos sacar más
dinero"
No
sé si has podido ver el tercer video de Planned parenthood. Te confieso que a
mi me ha costado verlo. Es repugnante. Hablan de bebés abortados como si fueran
pollos de corral. Bufff…
Te
cuento: aparece un bebé descuartizado. Se ven
perfectamente los brazos y las piernas.
Los empleados de Planned Parenthood se muestran contentos: "son piezas 5
estrellas”.
Van a sacar mucho dinero con él. Un "médico” dice que pueden obtener
por cada pieza entre 50 y 75 dólares y que en cada bebé pueden sacar como 3 ó 4
piezas. "O sea, unos 200 ó 300 dólares por uno entero; con eso estamos
contentos”.
Una
tercera persona interviene y dice que es mejor
venderlos por piezas en lugar de entero porque se puede sacar algo más de
dinero. ¡Como los pollos!
El
"médico” dice que todavía se mantiene la espina dorsal que da unidad a
todas las piezas y que eso permite transportarlo entero…
Se
me hiela la sangre cuando lo escribo, Lazaro R. Es repugnante. ¿Cómo puede
haber gente con tanta sangre fría?,¿cómo
pueden hablar de piezas humanas como si fueran piezas de un coche?,
¿cómo es posible que siga habiendo empresas que sigan financiando esta
barbarie?
Es
horrible. La maldad humana parece que no tiene final. Hasta se permiten hacer
bromas delante del cadáver.
Por
eso no entiendo cómo Pepsi, Unilever o
Starbucks pueden seguir financiando la industria del
terror.
¿Crees
que puedes seguir consumiendo shamoo Dove (Johnson & Johnson), comprar un jugo Ades a tu hijo, aderezar un sandwich con mayonesa Hellmans (productos de Unilever) o tomar una Pepsi, o ir a un Starbucks sabiendo que están financiando a una empresa
que lucran con el comercio de órganos de bebés abortados.
Paradójicamente
Johnson & Johnson tienen productos para bebés. Es increíble…
Yo
desde luego no tengo estómago para seguir consumiendo los productos de quien no
tiene inconveniente en mantener una industria ilegal, inhumana, inmoral y
espantosa.
Sé
que es una gota en el océano. Pero como decía santa Teresa de Calcuta, sin
muchas gotas el océano se quedaría seco. ¡Podemos!
Diles a los presidentes de las
compañías que retiren inmediatamente la financiación de una empresa que se ha revelado como lo más
antihumano que existe sobre la tierra:
Gracias,
Lazaro R, por apoyar esta campaña. Si no nos movemos ante una barbarie así,
¿Cuándo? Si no eres tú, ¿quién?
Un
fuerte abrazo,
Luis
Losada Pescador y todo el equipo de CitizenGO
PD.
No podemos permitir que los que comercian con los trozos de bebés abortados
sigan siendo percibidos como "hermanitas de Caridad”, sin contingencias
legales y recibiendo fondos públicos y privados. ¡STOP la financiación de
Planned Parenthood! http://www.citizengo.org/es/27342-starbucks-pepsi-y-johnson-johnson-siguen-financiando-planned-parenthood
PD2.
De momento ya hemos conseguido que la Fiscal General diga que va a abrir una
investigación después de que Justicia recibiera muchas quejas. ¡¡Enhorabuena!!
Lázaro R González para
Alcalde del Condado de Miami Elecciones de Noviembre 8 del 2016. Use la boleta en blanco.
Por favor infórmeselo
a todos los familiares, vecinos y amigos, No aceptamos contribuciones
monetarias Contacto: lazarorgonzalez@gmail.com
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment