. “EN MI OPINION” ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ .
. Lunes,
Febrero 2 2013 No 309
Editor Lázaro R González Miño .
Charles Чарльз (Charl'ze) Hagel
Chuck Hagel, Senador Republicano, oficial en
diferentes administraciones Republicanas incluyendo durante la administración
de Ronald Reagan, siempre tuvo posiciones flojas en cuanto a política
internacional, pero como Colin Powell, se le ha incrementado la veta con
la administración de Obama.
Sus posiciones entreguistas han sido méritos
suficiente para que Obama lo haya nominado para, nada menos, que a la posición
de Secretario de defensa.
A Hagel le vienen bien estas palabras de la
Biblia en Apocalipsis (3:15)
"Yo conozco tus obras, que ni eres frío
ni caliente! Ojalá fueses frío o caliente!
Pero por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca."
Pero por cuanto eres tibio, y no frío ni caliente, te vomitaré de mi boca."
Hagel realmente nos ha producido deseos de
vomitar durante las audiencias de confirmación.
Ted Cruz (Senador Cubano de Tejas) le repitió las palabras textuales que
había dicho en el senado sobre su oposición a las sanciones de Irán y la
reanudación de las relaciones con Cuba. Cuestionando su política en estos
casos.
Pero las preguntas más interesantes
fueron las del senador Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.) las cuales copio:
Graham: Hablemos un poco sobre las
declaraciones que usted ha hecho. Usted no ha dado explicaciones sobre esto.
Dijo que "el lobby judío intimida a mucha gente aquí. Yo no soy un senador
israelí, soy un senador de Estados Unidos. Esta presión nos hace cometer estupideces
a veces. "... Mr. Hagel, Nombre de una persona en tu opinión
que se siente intimidada por el lobby israelí en el Senado de Estados Unidos.
Hagel: Bueno, EH, yo..no
Graham: Nombre uno.
Hagel: no sé.
Graham: ¿Por qué no puede decirlo?
Hagel: no tengo en mente una persona
específica.
Graham: ¿Está de acuerdo es una declaración
provocadora? Que no puedo pensar en algo más provocativo que decir acerca de la
relación entre Estados Unidos, Israel, el Senado o el Congreso que lo que usted
dijo.
Hagel: Lamento la terminología.
Graham: Nombre una cosa estúpida a la que
hemos sido incitados debido a la presión del lobby israelí o judío.
Hagel: ya he dicho que lamento la
terminología.
Graham: pero usted dije entonces claramente,
que "provoca que hagamos cosas estúpidas" Usted no puede nombrar un
senador intimidado. Ahora no me puede dar un ejemplo de las cosas
estúpidas que estamos presionados para hacer aquí..
Hagel: Estábamos hablando en esa entrevista
sobre el Medio Oriente, sobre posiciones, sobre Israel, que es lo que me
refería.
Graham: Muy bien, entonces ¿me puede
dar un ejemplo sobre algún Senador presionado o alguna cosa estúpida hecha por
la intimidación en relación sobre posiciones sobre el Medio Oriente, en Israel
o en cualquier otro lugar a los que se refería en su entrevista?
Hagel: Bien, yo no puedo darle un
ejemplo.
Graham, Muchas Gracias
Another Potential School Tragedy Avoided... By Armed Guard
By Bobby Eberle February 1, 2013 7:13 am
So here's the news story that those on the left don't
want you to hear. Whenever someone goes crazy or someone with evil intentions
starts shooting, the result is usually tragic, and the reaction of the left is
to disarm the population. However, at an Atlanta middle school, after one child
was shot, the shooting came to an end... because of an armed guard.That's right. There was not a mass killing spree in Atlanta on Thursday, but there could have been. We'll never know. And thankfully so, because an armed guard stepped in.
As reported by USA Today, "A 14-year-old student was shot at an Atlanta middle school Thursday afternoon, and another student was taken into custody, police said."
An armed guard disarmed the shooter moments after the 1:50 p.m. shooting in a courtyard at the Price Middle School in southeast Atlanta.
Atlanta Public Schools public information officer Steve Alford said the teen's wound was more toward the back of the neck, WXIA-TV reported.
An armed off-duty Atlanta police officer who works at the school subdued the shooter and had him drop his weapon, Police Chief George Turner said.
Several shots were fired, Turner added. He did not identify the gun.
It appears that the shooting could have been gang related, but here's the point. Rather than having a shooter run amok, this school had an armed guard. Rather than disarming law-abiding Americans, shouldn't the real focus be on providing a safe and secure environment for our kids, Barack Obama's children go to a school with armed guards, but that's not acceptable for the rest of America? If children are really the focus, then let's protect them. These so-called "gun free" zones do nothing but invite violence. It's like putting up a sign that reads, "Come in. Stop by. Rob or shoot this place. Everyone is unarmed." http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2013/02/01/another-potential-school-tragedy-avoided-by-armed-guard/?subscriber=1
¿Cuando Va a Reventar USA es la pregunta?
Ricardo
Samitier
To r.samitier@live.com
Claramente,
estamos GRACIAS A LA COMPRA y PRESTAMOS DE
$85
Billones Mensuales a los Bancos
En La
Calma Antes De La Tormenta
La
presión se ha liberado sólo temporalmente, pero el origen son las obligaciones
no
financiadas
de una sociedad SOCIALISTA de AYUDAR a los que NO TRABAJAN están
todavía
en vigor...
Los
banqueros GRANDES han SIDO SALVADOS. Los presupuestos nacionales han sido
reparados.
Todo sobre las espaldas de los ahorradores, por y con la inflación.
El
petróleo es un 6% más que el año pasado. Oficialmente, la inflación es de 2,6%,
AUNQUE
HAY COSAS QUE SE HAN DISPARADO por arriba de esa cantidad...
Pero para NO DISCUTIR; el dinero en
nuestras cuentas bancarias y en los bolsillos de
toda
los ciudadanos del mundo CAPITALISTA fue robado de 2,6% de su riqueza.
Si ha
iniciado el año con $100 ahora tiene sólo $ 97.40
¿De Dónde
Salió Toda Esa Riqueza?
Para el
pueblo, que llega a utilizar el dinero en primer lugar. Los Banco Centrales de
los
Países
Capitalistas de conformidad con el criminal, ex empleado de Goldman Sachs,
Mario
Draghi y Ben Shalom Bernanke están
prestando dinero a los grandes bancos al
0.75%. La pregunta es...
¿Cómo Va
A Prestar Dinero A 0.75 Si La Inflación Es 2.6%?
Eso es una pérdida de casi el 2% por préstamo.
Incluso
Un Idiota, Puede Sumar Y Restar!
El
jefe de la mafia Fed el “Economista” Bernanke y Mario Draghi le están prestando
a los
Too Big
To Fail a precios AÚN MEJORES DE 0.50%. Esto
se supone para estimular la economía.
No!
ESO ES FALSO...Están Destruyendo Los Ahorros De La Gente!
El
capitalismo proviene de la inversión de los ahorros. No hay ahorro, no HAY
capitalismo!
El
Capitalismo No Es, La Creación De Deuda!
Esta
es la VERDAD... todos los que se endeudan VAN A LA BANCARROTA... todos lo
sabemos...
Obama
y sus seguidores en el Gobierno no son idiotas.
Ellos Son
Depravados COMUNISTAS Verdaderos Criminales...
Estos
delincuentes están haciendo lo mismo que hizo el “CHE” Guevara en el Banco
Nacional
De
Cuba... son una mafia mundial y controlan ahora todos los MEDIOS y a la MAYORIA
de los
POLITIQUEROS...en
los países Capitalistas... y ya están DESCARADAMENTE PASANDOLE LA
CUENTA
y ELIMINANDO a los que les estorban...
El Único
Motivo Por El € Y El $ Circulan Todavía,
se
debe a que la gente todavía confía en ellos... Pero, un día, esa confianza se
evapora!
¿Por
qué? Porque no podemos tener una sociedad en California con mas personas
viviendo
De un
cheque del gobierno POR NO TRABAJAR que personas TRABAJANDO...
O
Como en España...
·
13 millones de ciudadanos mayores
·
6 millones de estudiantes
·
5 millones de parados
·
3,5 millones de trabajadores del gobierno
·
Sólo 12 millones de trabajadores del sector privado! Que sostienen
todo ese
ANDAMIAJE
SOCIALISTA...
y ESA
SITUACION existe en la mayoría de las naciones occidentales.
Por
lo tanto, LA FIESTA CONTINÚA, cada vez con menos gente
TRABAJANDO... y la gente
Continúe
Girando a crédito. Pero cuando la gente se canse de cada vez tener menos...
Cuando
Todos Dejen De “PRETENDER”
Cuando
los banqueros reconozcan que sus bancos SON INSOLVENTES.
Cuando
los políticos DEJEN DE PRETENDER Que Han Resuelto La SITUACION...
Y EL
PUEBLO Deje De PRETENDER QUE SU PAIS...
Es Todo
Poderoso y RICO Que No Puede Quebrar...
Entonces
Piensan los Obama y Compañía que van a Imponer la Dictadura...
Por
eso no dicen estas Verdades:
Hoy
el gobierno debe por cada dólar que recibe 55 y Lehman Brothers quebró cuando
Debía
30a 1.
Cuando
las deudas son 55 veces más que los activos, toma 55 años para pagarla.
La
persona promedio sólo funciona 30 a 35 años.... Pero
tienen que comer...
Lo Que Significa, Que
Tenemos La Opción De Comer O Pagar Las Deudas.
¿Cuál
es primero? Puesto que, todos podemos contestar la pregunta...sin ser
economistas...
Crees
que los economistas, NO conocen esta situación también! Claro que si...
pero son unos mentirosos!
El
Dólar y el Euro están muertos. Ambos murieron, todo hace mucho tiempo, en
2008.
Sin
embargo, nadie ha enterrado el cadáver putrefacto de papel moneda. Los US $ y €
siguen
ahí, apestando la economía.
Por Eso,
Estamos En La Calma Antes De La Tormenta.
La
tormenta que viene, será aún más grande, porque nuestros "Llamados
Líderes" no
han
abordado el problema real. El Problema Es La Deuda. La
deuda tiene que ser pagada o desestimado en la corte.
Dado Que
No Es Posible Devolver El Dinero, Será Desestimada.
Como
ha sucedido en los ULTIMOS 50 años con el perdón de las deudas a los países
TERCER
MUNDISTAS...
La Única
Pregunta Es, ¿Cómo Y Cuándo?
CON LA
VIOLENCIA O CON CORDURA??
Conociendo
A Obama Y Los Socialistas Ya Ellos...
Eligieron
La VIOLENCIA...
Por Eso
QUIEREN DESARMAR AL PUEBLO...
Business Surprise! IRS
Calculates Cheapest ‘Obamacare’ Plan Will Average $20,000 Per Family
Feb. 1, 2013 1:23pm
When
the Obama White House and Congress passed The Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act (i.e. “Obamacare”), we clearly recall being told that the bill would
save Americans money.
Yet,
as CNSNews.com reports, the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) in a regulation issued Wednesday “assumed that under Obamacare
the cheapest health insurance plan available in 2016 for a family will cost
$20,000 for the year.”
Wait,
what?
Yes,
while explaining the penalty for not purchasing government insurance, the IRS
calculates that the average annual cost for a family will be at about $20,000.
“The
IRS’s assumption that the cheapest plan for a family will cost $20,000 per year
is found in examples the IRS gives to help people understand how to calculate
the penalty they will need to pay the government if they do not buy a mandated
health plan,” CNSNews.com reports.
“The
examples point to families of four and families of five, both of which the IRS
expects in its assumptions to pay a minimum of $20,000 per year for a bronze
plan,” the report adds.
Wait
a minute. What is the exact language of the IRS regulation?
“The
annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3
children) is $20,000,” the regulation states.
Oh.
“Bronze
will be the lowest tier health-insurance plan available under Obamacare — after
Silver, Gold, and Platinum,” CNS explains. “Under the law, the penalty for not
buying health insurance is supposed to be capped at either the annual average
Bronze premium, 2.5 percent of taxable income, or $2,085.00 per family in
2016.”
In the new rules published Wednesday, the IRS also made law the regulations
regarding the fines and penalties incurred if someone chooses not to buy the
insurance. And in an attempt to explain these laws, the agency draws up a few
examples.
“[T]he
IRS assumes that families of five who are uninsured would need to pay an average
of $20,000 per year to purchase a Bronze plan in 2016,” CNS notes.
“Using
the conditions laid out in the regulations, the IRS calculates that a family
earning $120,000 per year that did not buy insurance would need to pay a
‘penalty’ (a word the IRS still uses despite the Supreme Court ruling that it
is in fact a ‘tax’) of $2,400 in 2016,” the report adds.
And
just in case you were wondering how convoluted and contrived these new
regulations look like, here’s the exact language from the IRS:
Example
3. Family without minimum essential coverage.
“(i)
In 2016, Taxpayers H and J are married and file a joint return. H and J have
three children: K, age 21, L, age 15, and M, age 10. No member of the family
has minimum essential coverage for any month in 2016. H and J’s household
income is $120,000. H and J’s applicable filing threshold is $24,000. The
annual national average bronze plan premium for a family of 5 (2 adults, 3
children) is $20,000.
“(ii)
For each month in 2016, under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (b)(2)(iii) of this
section, the applicable dollar amount is $2,780 (($695 x 3 adults) + (($695/2)
x 2 children)). Under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, the flat dollar
amount is $2,085 (the lesser of $2,780 and $2,085 ($695 x 3)). Under paragraph
(b)(3) of this section, the excess income amount is $2,400 (($120,000 –
$24,000) x 0.025). Therefore, under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the
monthly penalty amount is $200 (the greater of $173.75 ($2,085/12) or $200
($2,400/12)).
“(iii)
The sum of the monthly penalty amounts is $2,400 ($200 x 12). The sum of the
monthly national average bronze plan premiums is $20,000 ($20,000/12 x 12).
Therefore, under paragraph (a) of this section, the shared responsibility
payment imposed on H and J for 2016 is $2,400 (the lesser of $2,400 or $20,000)
Desarmar al pueblo americano, es desarmar a América, es debilitar la democracia y por es de...es minar la libertad. Eso es lo que buscan.
God Bless América!
Están pasándole la Cuenta a Bob Menéndez
Ricardo Samitier To r.samitier@live.com
Bob Menéndez… por no ser un SOCIALISTA 100% ahora le están
pasando la cuenta... se acostó con ellos... los ayudo... en CASI TODO... pero
con los COMUNSITAS ESTAS 100% o te SIQUITRILLAN...
Todos...
Demócratas y Republicanos la prensa de DERECHA e IZQUIERDA... están INDIGNADOS
por la acusación de que tuvo relaciones con dos putas dominicanas...
PREGUNTO????
¿ACASO
no es MAS ABERRANTE
y ENFERMIZO INTRODUCIRLE
UN TABACO a una mujer en la vagina para producirle placer como sabemos
Clinton le hizo a la Mónica... que Menéndez cayera un día de debilidad, si
es que eso paso, no se sabe, por
qué otros motivos... y tener relaciones SEXUALES
NORMALES con putas...
Que hizo la
PRENSA cuando Clinton permitía y violaba la “OFICINA PRESIDENCIAL”
permitiéndole a Mónica que ella tuviera relaciones sexuales con su PENE...
NUNCA Clinton sufrió una campaña de esta que sufre Menéndez...
Dear Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino “En mi opinion” ,
Across
our nation, rich, poor, parents, teachers, kids and grownups have come together
to fight against a one-size-fits-all federal government approach to schools.
They, and hopefully you, believe that though reform is slow it is vital to our
country and to our children.
Just
this past year Americans for Prosperity, along with a broad coalition of
groups, battled at the forefront for some major education reforms. One of the
most successful state school choice programs is in Louisiana. According to
Educate Now, 84 percent of New Orleans public school students now attend
charter schools. These charter schools overwhelming help poor, minority, and
low-performing students succeed, where traditional public schools have failed.
In
Georgia, over 58,000 students enrolled in one of Georgia’s 109 public charter
schools. After a legal challenged threatened students’ access to this
high-quality education last year, Georgia voters overwhelmingly reaffirmed
their state’s ability to create more charters by 59% – a massive victory for
their students, who have a bright future!
And
the victories continue.
In
Indiana, there now exist over 50 charter schools, many of which focus on a
single subject,such as reading or math, to help students improve or further
excel in the subject. Indiana has become a leader in revolutionizing the way
children are educated.
The
results have been staggering.
In
New York City’s Success Academy schools 96% of Success Academy
Students passed the math section of the city’s assessment test
last year, outperforming the NYC’s public schools by 31%. Even better, an
unbelievable 100% passed the science section, with 91% earning an advanced
rating. In Washington, D.C. 82% of Opportunity Scholarship students graduated
high school, compared to 70% of those not selected for the program.
While
we recognize that not every education reform is successful, the overwhelming
majority studies conclude that charter schools on average perform just as well
or significantly better than traditional public schools. In fact the latest and largest review
of these studies, released earlier this week by AFP Foundation, found that two-thirds of
these studies conducted after 2001 concluded charter schools help more students
achieve higher results.
This
is a fight that we are winning.
So,
that’s why I’m writing to you today, to say thank you for joining Americans for
Prosperity Foundation and other groups throughout our country this past week to
voice your support for education reform.
We
appreciated the enthusiasm which so many of you displayed as you came out
despite the cold weather. Because of you, real reform is occurring.
Keep
up the fight!
Tim Phillips
Obama's Jobs Council Shutting Down
Thursday, 31 Jan 2013 01:39 PM
President Barack Obama will let his jobs
council expire this week without renewing its charter, winding down one source
of input from the business community even as unemployment remains stubbornly
high.
When Obama in January 2011 formed his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, unemployment was hovering above 9 percent. Two years president later, more than 12 million people in the U.S. are out of work.
Declassified: ‘Financial War’ Could Wipe Out 50% of Your Wealth’
The unemployment rate has improved to 7.8 percent, but both parties agree that's still too high.
A provision in Obama's executive order establishing the council says it sunsets on Thursday. A White House official said the president does not plan to extend it.
Officials said the president always intended for the council to fulfill its mission and then wind down, and said that Obama would continue to actively engage and seek input from business leaders about ways to accelerate job-creation and economic growth. Among the steps Obama plans to pursue are expedited permits for infrastructure projects, the White House said.
Even before it was clear whether Obama would renew the jobs council, Republicans seized on its likely expiration as evidence the president has devoted insufficient attention to creating jobs, which polling shows remains a top priority for Americans.
The Republican National Committee dubbed it part of "the failed Obama record," while the House Republicans' campaign committee, in an online petition, accused Obama of laying off his own jobs council.
Adding to the concern about the job market's continued vulnerability, the Commerce Department said Wednesday that the U.S. economy shrank at an annual rate of 0.1 percent from October through December of last year, the first quarterly drop since 2009.
The jobs council was a successor to another economic advisory board Obama created at the onset of his presidency. The panel was chaired by General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt and was comprised of prominent business leaders and economists.
Obama met with the council only a handful of times. During the last meeting, in February 2012, the president and the council highlighted an engineering education initiative alongside school deans.
The jobs council's main work product was released in January 2012, entitled "Roadmap to Renewal." The council also organized a series of "listening and action" meetings across the country last year with business owners, local elected officials and academics, although Obama didn't attend those sessions.
Critics have argued that the council's primary purpose was to create the appearance of action at a time when the nation was pining for something — anything — to rein in soaring joblessness. The administration acted on many of the council's recommendations, including suggestions for streamlining the permitting process.
Declassified: ‘Financial War’ Could Wipe Out 50% of Your Wealth’
But the White House was at odds with several council members on tax policies, particularly a proposal to exclude overseas corporate earnings from U.S. taxes. That idea divided even the jobs council, whose membership included labor and Obama's political allies.
The council's dissolution also comes as White House aides are optimistic about the prospects for a second-term detente with the business community, which bristled during Obama's first term at his harsh depiction of "fat-cat bankers" and his efforts to impose regulations, tax policies and spending initiatives they argued were unfriendly to business. Obama aides hope the softening of the relationship between the president and the business world can benefit the White House in future fiscal debates with Republicans.
White House officials said the president made a fresh effort to reach out to business in the days following his re-election. Between the November election and the end of 2012, in the height of negotiations to avert the so-called fiscal cliff, more than 400 business leaders, ranging from CEOs of large multinational companies to small business owners, met with Obama or his aides at the White House, officials said
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-jobs-council-closing/2013/01/31/id/488307?s=al&promo_code=12473-1#ixzz2JfmkU7ou
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
When Obama in January 2011 formed his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, unemployment was hovering above 9 percent. Two years president later, more than 12 million people in the U.S. are out of work.
Declassified: ‘Financial War’ Could Wipe Out 50% of Your Wealth’
The unemployment rate has improved to 7.8 percent, but both parties agree that's still too high.
A provision in Obama's executive order establishing the council says it sunsets on Thursday. A White House official said the president does not plan to extend it.
Officials said the president always intended for the council to fulfill its mission and then wind down, and said that Obama would continue to actively engage and seek input from business leaders about ways to accelerate job-creation and economic growth. Among the steps Obama plans to pursue are expedited permits for infrastructure projects, the White House said.
Even before it was clear whether Obama would renew the jobs council, Republicans seized on its likely expiration as evidence the president has devoted insufficient attention to creating jobs, which polling shows remains a top priority for Americans.
The Republican National Committee dubbed it part of "the failed Obama record," while the House Republicans' campaign committee, in an online petition, accused Obama of laying off his own jobs council.
Adding to the concern about the job market's continued vulnerability, the Commerce Department said Wednesday that the U.S. economy shrank at an annual rate of 0.1 percent from October through December of last year, the first quarterly drop since 2009.
The jobs council was a successor to another economic advisory board Obama created at the onset of his presidency. The panel was chaired by General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt and was comprised of prominent business leaders and economists.
Obama met with the council only a handful of times. During the last meeting, in February 2012, the president and the council highlighted an engineering education initiative alongside school deans.
The jobs council's main work product was released in January 2012, entitled "Roadmap to Renewal." The council also organized a series of "listening and action" meetings across the country last year with business owners, local elected officials and academics, although Obama didn't attend those sessions.
Critics have argued that the council's primary purpose was to create the appearance of action at a time when the nation was pining for something — anything — to rein in soaring joblessness. The administration acted on many of the council's recommendations, including suggestions for streamlining the permitting process.
Declassified: ‘Financial War’ Could Wipe Out 50% of Your Wealth’
But the White House was at odds with several council members on tax policies, particularly a proposal to exclude overseas corporate earnings from U.S. taxes. That idea divided even the jobs council, whose membership included labor and Obama's political allies.
The council's dissolution also comes as White House aides are optimistic about the prospects for a second-term detente with the business community, which bristled during Obama's first term at his harsh depiction of "fat-cat bankers" and his efforts to impose regulations, tax policies and spending initiatives they argued were unfriendly to business. Obama aides hope the softening of the relationship between the president and the business world can benefit the White House in future fiscal debates with Republicans.
White House officials said the president made a fresh effort to reach out to business in the days following his re-election. Between the November election and the end of 2012, in the height of negotiations to avert the so-called fiscal cliff, more than 400 business leaders, ranging from CEOs of large multinational companies to small business owners, met with Obama or his aides at the White House, officials said
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/obama-jobs-council-closing/2013/01/31/id/488307?s=al&promo_code=12473-1#ixzz2JfmkU7ou
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Participan
en “En mi opinión” Alberto L. Pérez “amenper”, Alexis Ortiz, Amb. Armando
Valladares, Annie González, Ing. Armando López Calleja, J. Fresno, Bárbara
Fernández, Carlos Bringuier, Efraín Sinaí, Eladio José Armesto, Enrique
Enríquez, Enrique de Diego, Erick Ruiz,
Emigdio Prado, Gerardo Alfredo DeSola, Georgina López, Gustavo Rojas, Héctor
Molina, Héctor Lemange Sando, Irmende Méndez, Jesús Angulo, Jesús Marzo
Fernández, Jorge A Villalon, Jorge Aguiar , José y Marcia Caula, J Fresno, Luis
Pensado, Lili Samways, Manny Fernández, Margarita Sánchez, María Argelia
Vizcaíno, May De La Vega, Mil amigos de Holguín, Miriam Pinedo, Miriam Dopico, Margarita
Sánchez, Marlene, Martha Ruiz, María
Lahullier, Olga Griñan, Oscar Díaz, Philip
V. Riggio, Raúl
Barroso, Reinaldo López jr, Ricardo
Samitier, Rolando Antonio Lara, Sergio Bello, Sofía Iduate, Sonia “Chuchin”
Castell, Tony Flores, V J Marino, William Benard, Victor M Caamaño, http://news.yahoo.com,
NoticieroDigital.com , CNN Español, LaNuevaNacion.com, TheBLAZE.com, The
WesternCenterforJournalism.com, LastResistance.com, NewsMax.com, RealClearPolitics.com, GOPUSA.com, LIGNET.com, TheTradingReport.com, Beforeit’sNews.com,
http://economyincrisis.org, http://worldnews.nbcnews.com,
. “EN MI
OPINION” .
. Editor Lázaro R González Miño .
La creación de riqueza que es la única alternativa a la
superación de la pobreza. Los derechos individuales son éticamente la antítesis
de los derechos humanos.
No comments:
Post a Comment