No 869 “En mi
opinión”
Febrero 17, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE MAS GRANDE EN LA HISTORIA DE USA
Amenper:
Reflexión de Una mente Civilizada
No creo que una mente civilizada pueda
comprender realmente lo que estamos presenciando en las noticias con respecto a
la brutalidad de los bárbaros musulmanes.
Escapa a nuestro razonamiento el ver como 21 seres humanos son decapitados por
sus creencias religiosas como era costumbre en el siglo VI, y nos los presentan con videos de
tecnología del siglo XXI. (Al final del E mail pueden ver el video)
Escapa al razonamiento como el mundo civilizado no se aterra lo
suficiente ante tan horrible comportamiento.
No creo como me quieren hacer creer que esto es algo de unos cuantos
militantes que como algunos cristianos tergiversan las doctrinas de su
religión, estos tergiversan las doctrinas del Islam.
He leído el Corán, y lo que creo que son religiosos que siguen las
doctrinas de una religión guerrerista y criminal, y que tenemos que como
cristianos, enfrentarnos a ella.
Pero entonces algunos nos dicen que el cristianismo es una religión de
paz y que no debemos responder fuerza con fuerza, que Cristo dijo que si te
golpean en una mejilla presenta la otra.
¿Entonces deberán los cristianos simplemente no usar la fuerza y dejar
que destruyan , sus valores, su moral su familia sus creencias, su, su vida?.
¿Deben los cristianos no contra-atacar?
Pero Cristo dijo que volviéramos la otra mejilla, en este caso si nos
cortan la cabeza no tenemos oportunidad de presentar la otra cabeza.
Así que antes de que no la corten vamos a usar la cabeza para analizar
sobre estos, que con un extraño puritanismo nos quieren hablar que la paz del
cristianismo, vamos a hablar desde un punto de vista puramente cristiano, como
quieren hablar de cristianismo, está bien, hablemos de cristianismo.
Decir que un grupo o nación no deban defenderse cuando lo atacan, es
algo ingenuo, estúpido, o cómplice, depende de quién y por qué lo dice, pero si
quieren hablar de la religión cristiana, vamos a hablar con propiedad, si eso
es lo que ellos quieren.
Dicen que los cristianos que estaban siendo perseguidos por los paganos
romanos y nunca utilizaron cualquier fuerza militante, pero esto es totalmente impreciso.
Cuando los cristianos no tenían ninguna influencia sobre el gobierno de
Roma, no constituían ninguna fuerza, no tenían medios para responder al poderío
de Roma eran pacíficos, pero en realidad por necesidad, porque no tenían medios
militares para defenderse, como los disidentes pacíficos en Cuba.
Pero en cuanto Dios utilizó una batalla en la guerra para la conversión
del emperador Constantino,
este fue el punto de partida cuando los cristianos comenzaron a utilizar la
guerra justa para su defensa..
La primera guerra cristiana fue en 312 D.C., cuando Constantino,
manteniendo la señal de la Cruz, derrotó al tirano pagano Majencio. Esta fue la intervención de Dios para
terminar la persecución de los cristianos en Roma. O sea Dios usó la guerra, no
la paz para defender a su iglesia.
O sea que los cristianos, tan pronto como en el primer siglo, utilizaron una guerra
contra los paganos, no fue ni siquiera una cruzada, fue algo defensivo, y esto
lo que muestra realmente es
en realidad cómo en un momento dado el cristianismo puede y debe usar una
guerra justa.
Exactamente lo mismo puede decirse del antiguo Israel. Cuando el hebreo
era perseguido bajo el Faraón, no podían declarar guerra a Egipto, igual
que los cristianos del primer siglo a Roma. Pero tan pronto como tuvieron a
Moisés como su líder recuerden que el ejercito del Faraón quedó ahogado en las aguas del
Mar Rojo, una intervención de Dios no muy pacífica que digamos
Pero bueno, me pueden argumentar los
más puritanos teólogos que lo
que digo arriba es historia secular y antiguo testamento, y me pueden decir que
no es doctrina cristiana que se encuentra sólo en el nuevo testamento.
Lo cual también es discutible, porque todo lo que sucede viene de Dios y todo puede y debe de usarse
para entendimiento.
Pero vamos a aceptar esto, vamos a aceptar todas las maneras posibles de
exponer la razón, y vamos a
ver solamente el nuevo
testamento.
Empecemos por lo que nos dice el libro de Hebreos
11-32¿Y qué más digo?
Porque el tiempo me faltaría contando de Gedeón, de Barac, de Sansón, de Jefté,
de David, así como de Samuel y de los profetas; 33que por fe
conquistaron reinos, hicieron justicia, alcanzaron promesas, taparon bocas de
leones, 34apagaron fuegos impetuosos, evitaron filo de espada,
sacaron fuerzas de debilidad, se hicieron fuertes en batallas, pusieron en fuga
ejércitos extranjeros.
Lo que nos dice el escritor de Hebreos, ya sea San Pablo o quien lo haya
escrito, es que Dios no condena una guerra justa no la condenó en Israel como
no la condenaría en el caso de alguien como el "Francotirador
Americano" que arriesgó su vida para salvar a otros de los terroristas que
iban a asesinar a inocentes. Fue
Jesús el que dijo "3Nadie tiene mayor amor
que este, que uno ponga su vida por sus amigos".
Vamos a leer en el libro de los
hechos de los apóstoles, en el capítulo 23, cuando un joven informó Pablo que
algunos judíos estaban
decididos a matarlo, por su "traición" al judaismo.
¿Qué dijo Pablo?
¿ Déjame aquí y que me maten, puesto
que nosotros no peleamos somos pacifistas?.Noo ..... el se defendió.
Llamó a un centurión para que
informara al Gobernador Felix que él tenía sus derechos como ciudadano Romano,
y éste recibió su mensaje y envió a Centuriones para que los protegieran y lo
llevaran a la fortaleza.
Si algunos de los religiosos judíos
hubieran llegado para tratar de matar a Paul, los soldados protegiendo a Pablo
no habrían dudado en matar a los atacantes.
Y Pablo no hubiera tenido un problema
con esto.
Si Pablo puede utilizar un ejército para
protegerse contra sus perseguidores, los cristianos, entonces, tiene
justificación en el uso de
ejércitos para protegerse contra cualquier grupo musulmán que busca la sangre
de los cristianos..
¿Cómo puede uno criticar la
militancia del cristianismo después de leer el libro de hechos y de hebreos, y otros pasajes bíblicos
cuando se alaba las batallas pasadas e ilustres del pueblo de Dios contra sus
enemigos.
Pero lamentablemente hay cristianos
en América, condicionados por la comodidad en que viven, o por razones
políticas, que denuncian tales hazañas gloriosas.
Estos son aquellos que siguen el
Evangelio de la inutilidad y probablemente sean condescendientes contra cualquiera que criticara a
algún pastor pacifista celebre como Tim LaHaye, mientras condenan a los
cristianos por contraatacar como defensa.
Creo que es hora de denunciar este
cristianismo vacío, sin vida, esta herejía que está determinada por la moda, la
comodidad en algunos y la agenda política cómplice en otros.
Reflexionemos de lo que
verdaderamente cristianismo se trata, y cómo la guerra justa es una parte de
esta guerra de la supervivencia de la fe cristiana.
Cristo expulsó a los ladrones del
templo de su padre con un látigo; entonces no es malo para los cristianos a
expulsar a quienes quieran robar vidas inocentes de esta tierra.
Al final del mundo, la
Biblia nos dice que habrá una gran guerra entre el pueblo de Cristo, y la puta de Babilonia, no
será un momento de paz,
Cristo defenderá a Israel con su Iglesia contra la puta de Babilonia, la defenderá... y va a ganar.
Entonces ¿De que nos están
hablando? Mejor es que se
concentren más en las doctrinas de Marx y nos reclamenen sus puntos basados en
esas doctrinas y no se metan en las doctrinas cristianas.
Por nuestra parte, creo que debemos
hacer como Cristo cuando echó a los mercaderes del templo, como Cristo cuando
vuelva a defender a su pueblo.
Un soldado luchando contra el
mal musulmán no es un asesino como algunos políticos liberales sugieren utilizando su versión del
cristianismo, un soldado luchando en el Medio Oriente , es como combatiente en
una guerra justa entre la tiranía y el mundo civilizado.
El Presidente Obama nos habló dijo de
los crímenes que se han cometido a nombre de Cristo, y yo creo que el mayor
crimen que se está cometiendo usando el nombre de Cristo es cuando usan las palabras
de Cristo para justificar a los que están tratando de destruir el cristianismo.
Terrible paradoja esta, de los liberales incluyendo a nuestro presidente.
Si Obama me quiere dar lecciones de
moral, de cristianismo, él lo puede hacer, porque tiene los medios para
hacerlo, él es el presidente electo.
Pero los cristianos de América tienen el derecho como ciudadanos el exigir algo de
Obama en este caso. Como en
el caso de Pablo cuando le recordó al Gobernador Félix de sus derechos como
ciudadano Romano, como el
Gobernador Félix protegió a Pablo, reclamar
que el presidente Obama proteja a los ciudadanos cristianos de los Estados
Unidos de América contra el peligro musulmán, es su deber.
Pero como la voz de Juan el Bautista
en el desierto, la voz de los que pedimos esto clama sin respuesta. Tenemos que olvidarnos
de la actualmente anacrónica tradición cristiana en este mundo en que vivimos,
lo que pedimos simplemente no es "políticamente correcto" ni siquiera
podemos mencionar el nombre del enemigo que nos va a destruir.
Pero como no soy alguien, soy muy
poca cosa, si puedo decirlo, es el estado ISLAMICO, A NOMBRE DEL ISLAM Y
DE MAHOMA SU PROFETA, Y ESTE ES EL VIDEO QUE NO NOS QUIEREN ENESEÑAR
WATCH: ISIS Mass Coptic Christian Beheading
Execution Video
Published 3:39 pm EST, February 15, 2015 Updated 5:13 pm EST, February 15, 2015
6 Comments Sam Prince
The Islamic State has released a new video
allegedly showing the beheading of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians in Libya.
Watch the graphic video above.
Media companies like Al Jazeera have vowed
not to air the video in its entirety and we agree. But video stills of the massacre are
available beyond
what this short Vine shows.
Al-Jazeera reports that the men perpetrating the mass beheading
are taking revenge for “Muslim women persecuted by Coptic crusaders in Egypt.”
Crusaders is a term for “Christians” in
Muslim theology, alluding to the Medieval reconquering of the Middle East by
European Christians that ended around 1300.
Oddly enough, prior to the Muslim Crusades of
around 800, Egypt was a majority Coptic Christian country.
Amenper: La guerra Justa
y necesaria
El bien, el
amor, la dignidad, el deber, el sacrificio, la virtud, la guerra justa y
necesaria por el bien de todos los cubanos y de la humanidad
José Martí
La guerra justa y necesaria es un principio estudiado y discutido como
doctrina y aceptado por todas las naciones civilizadas. José Martí
era un jurista graduado de las universidades de Madrid y Zaragoza y fue también
influenciado en su pensamiento por su estancia en Francia. Martí conocía los
principios y la necesidad de una guerra justa y necesaria.
Aunque no lo queramos reconocer, estamos en la tercera guerra
mundial. Una guerra contra un enemigo quizás peor que los anteriores
porque es un bárbaro viviendo en un pasado fanático religioso.
Una guerra en que nos encontramos en una situación en que nuestros
gobernantes no quieren ni siquiera mencionar el nombre del enemigo.
El cuidado de la república ha sido encomendado a los gobernantes, a ellos
compete defender el bien público del país, de los ciudadanos sometidos a su
autoridad.
Pues bien, del mismo modo que la defienden lícitamente con la espada
material contra los perturbadores internos, castigando a los malhechores, a
tenor de las palabras del Apóstol Pablo: «No en vano lleva la espada, pues es
un servidor de Dios para hacer justicia y castigar al que obra mal» (Rm 13,4).
Le incumbe también defender el bien público con la espada de la guerra contra
los enemigos externos.
San Agustín, por su parte, en el libro Contra Faust, enseña: «El orden
natural, acomodado a la paz de los mortales, postula que la autoridad y la
deliberación de aceptar la guerra pertenezca a los gobernantes, o sea es el
deber y la obligación de los gobernantes para proteger a los gobernados
Por eso escribe también San Agustín en el libro Quaest: «Suelen
llamarse guerras justas las que vengan por las injusticias; por ejemplo, si ha
habido lugar para castigar al pueblo o al país que descuida castigar el
atropello cometido por los suyos o restituir lo que ha sido injustamente
robado»
Las teorías sobre la de guerra justa (jus bellum iustum) es una doctrina,
también conocida como una tradición, de la ética militar estudiado por
teólogos, expertos en ética, legisladores y líderes militares. El propósito de
la doctrina es asegurar que la guerra es moralmente justificable a través de
una serie de criterios que deben cumplirse para que una guerra deba de ser
considerada justa.
Los criterios se dividen en dos grupos: "el derecho a ir a la
guerra '' (jus ad bellum) y la conducta en la guerra la '' (jus en
bello). El primero refiere a la moralidad de ir a la guerra y la segunda con
una conducta moral dentro de la guerra.
El enemigo ha violado los dos grupos, no tienen una justificación para la
guerra y en cuanto a la conducta moral dentro de la guerra, no ha habido en el
mundo civilizado moderno un grupo o nación que haya cometido las atrocidades de
este enemigo.
Es el deber de los gobernantes enfrentar al enemigo no entrar en
componendas con el enemigo.
Se conoce que Muammar Gaddafi estaba más que dispuesto a una transición
pacífica. Lo sabemos por los tapes que han sido hechos público por el
Pentágono.
Pero Barack Obama y Hillary Clinton. entregaron a Libia a los militantes
islámicos y ahora es un territorio fértil para ISIS. La muerte del
embajador americano en Bengasi, la decapitación de los cristianos en Libia es
simplemente el resultado de la política entreguista de esta administración.
Tal parece que las políticas de nuestros gobernantes, no son para la guerra
justa y necesaria contra el enemigo, pero para entregar a nuestro país y el
mundo a nuestros enemigos.
FW: EL FINAL DE LA ERA
DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI
TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
From: aelcv32@hotmail.com
To: osvaldo40@atlanticbb.net; beaappel@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: EL FINAL DE LA ERA DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:42:35 -0500
To: osvaldo40@atlanticbb.net; beaappel@hotmail.com
Subject: RE: EL FINAL DE LA ERA DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 19:42:35 -0500
Felicito de todo Corazon, a estos dos
amigos, por el magnifico mensaje que le estan enviando al mundo, ya que al
fin nos quitamos la dependencia del suministro del petroleo de los paises
Arabes, al bajar el precio del barril de petroleo, deido a la masiva
venta del petroleo Americanos, esto se lo han sentido, Venezuela y nuestra
sufrida Patria=Cuba, asi como otros paise de Americda y del mundo.
Por esta accion, debemos felicitar al Gobierno de los EEUU....cierto
La frsea lapidaria "La era del petroleo Arabe ha terminado"
Ing. Armando Lopez-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio y de la UCP
Por esta accion, debemos felicitar al Gobierno de los EEUU....cierto
La frsea lapidaria "La era del petroleo Arabe ha terminado"
Ing. Armando Lopez-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio y de la UCP
From: osvaldo40@atlanticbb.net
Subject: Fwd: FW: EL FINAL DE LA ERA DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:12:39 -0500
Subject: Fwd: FW: EL FINAL DE LA ERA DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:12:39 -0500
--- the forwarded message follows ---
--Forwarded Message Attachment--
From: beaappel@hotmail.com
To: aureliopadron@bellsouth.net
Subject: FW: EL FINAL DE LA ERA DEL PETRÓLEO ÁRABE / UNA BUENA NOTICIA...ESPERANDO QUE SEA REALIDAD.. SI ES ASI TODAVIA HAY ESPERANZA DE UN MUNDO MEJOR
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 01:02:43 +0000
I believe in the sun even if isn't shinning
I
believe in love even when I am alone
I
believe in God even when He is silent
Armando Lopez-Calleja
La era del petroleo
arabe ha terminado…
Cuando
los estados del Golfo se quedan sin dinero para gastar y estan
experimentando sacudidas internas, la era del poder arabe
destructivo esta llegando a su
fin; la era de la mente y la innovación israelies,
por otra parte, acaba de comenzar.
Fuente: Ynetnews
La noticia más
espectacular de 2014 pasó casi desapercibida: Estados Unidos levantó las
restricciones a las exportaciones de petróleo estadounidense, y a partir del
primer día del nuevo año ha comenzado a exportar petróleo al mundo.
Nadie creía que esto sucedería tan rápido, pero EE.UU. ya es el mayor
productor de petróleo del mundo, mayor que Arabia Saudita, gracias a la
tecnología de pizarra bituminosa, que cambió el mundo de la energía.
Dentro de un año, se espera que EE.UU. exporte alrededor de un millón de
barriles de petróleo por día y produzca 12 millones de barriles por día. Iran,
en comparación, produce un millón y medio de barriles por día.
Esto significa que los precios del petróleo continuarán bajando, porque
EE.UU. ya está compitiendo contra otros productores. Como resultado, Rusia será
aplastada, Arabia Saudita y el resto de los estados del Golfo caerán de bruces,
el cártel colapsará, y todas las dictaduras que se basaban principalmente en el
petróleo – como Irán – se enfrentarán a un futuro sombrío.
Al mismo tiempo, las democracias como Canada, Brasil, Mexico, Nigeria e
incluso el pequeño Israel entraran en el mercado.
La era del petroleo árabe ha terminado, y también el poder destructivo
de las dictaduras petroleras del Golfo Pérsico. Estas dictaduras han controlado
vergonzosamente a la deteriorada Europa: Comprando políticos, sobornando a
empresas, asumiendo el control de la economía y ganando poder político, que
también fue utilizado en contra de Israel.
Tomará algunos meses, pero tanto los europeos como los estadounidenses
se darán cuenta de que la era del destructivo poder árabe ha terminado, porque
los estados del Golfo no tendrán dinero para gastar. Por el contrario, serán
sacudidos desde adentro por conmociones sociales, étnicas y terroristas, ya que
no tendrán dinero para continuar satisfaciendo al terrorismo.
Ya se pueden ver los signos de la caída del poder árabe. Veintidós
estados árabes hicieron un enorme esfuerzo, la semana pasada, para hacer
aprobar una resolución contra Israel en el Consejo de Seguridad de las Naciones
Unidas, pero fracasaron. EE.UU. permaneció inmutable, y también países
occidentales fuertes. Es cierto que Francia y Luxemburgo siguen estando
controlados por el capital árabe, o piensan que lo están, pero ellos también se
darán cuenta de que la era del dinero árabe ha terminado.
Pero a medida que los precios del petróleo sigan bajando, ¿que pasara
con Rusia? El país está colapsando y podría recurrir a una guerra europea para
salvarse. ¿Y qué pasará con Egipto, que está financiado por Arabia Saudita?
Este último ya está recortando su ayuda a El Cairo, porque el dinero ya no es
una obviedad.
Y ¿qué pasa con los estados ricos del Golfo, como Qatar? Se engañan a sí
mismos de que alguien estará interesado en ellos si no es por el petróleo.
Algunos incluso están jugando con la idea del turismo. Bueno, si no es por el
petróleo, nadie quiere ir allá en absoluto, y la arena cubrirá una vez más las
torres que han construido y que se levantan en el aire.
¿Y la Autoridad Palestina de Mahmoud Abbas? Bueno, en realidad nadie del
Golfo dona dinero a esta entidad, incluso antes de la crisis, aunque siempre
hubo alegres declaraciones.
Cuando comienza el año 2015, estamos frente a un nuevo mundo: Un mundo
de una revolución de la información, la mente, la fuerza personal, la
innovación y los inventos. Y en este mundo, Israel es un príncipe real.
La era del petróleo árabe ha terminado y comienza la era de la mente
global e israelí. Es un hecho que los países que no se atrevían a acercarse a
nosotros en el pasado – a causa de la extorsión árabe – ahora lo están haciendo
a toda prisa, como para compensar el tiempo perdido durante tantos años.
Israel se está convirtiendo en un amigo cercano de países que eran
distantes en el pasado, pero se acercan hoy en día, como la India, Japón, China
y Corea del Sur. Ellos también comprenden que los que no son innovadores y
carecen de una mente creativa no sobrevivirán. Y en este campo, Israel tiene
mucho que ofrecerles, al igual que ellos tienen mucho que ofrecer a cambio
Amenper: Mi Computadora
Mi
computadora es una parte esencial en mi vida. No es que sea “Mi
Amante” como dice mi esposa, no es para mí un fetiche sexual, aunque lo sea
para alguno de ustedes por los E Mail que me mandan.
No creo
que sea realmente “mi droga”, aunque sin lugar a duda la uso como un fármaco
tranquilizante para descargar mis frustraciones como saben ustedes.
Mi
computadora es el empleado más eficiente que tengo en el trabajo, me sirve como
un contable eficiente, me guarda la información del negocio, me ofrece
consultoría que de otra manera necesitaría varios empleados y volúmenes de
libros que no cabrían en mi oficina.
Me ofrece
noticias al momento antes de que ocurran en los medios de comunicación.
Me ofrece
información de los políticos, de los jugadores deportivos.
Puedo
comprar con ella los tickets para los juegos y las entradas para el teatro
Me sirve
de agencia de viajes, puedo hacer reservaciones desde mi silla que antes me
tomaban viajes a oficinas, innumerables llamadas telefónicas, y disgustos con
los agentes.
Me enseña
literatura, geografía, historia y fotos de lugares que he visitado y que me
gustaría visitar.
También
me ha convertido en un Pascual Pérez virtual, Pascual Pérez era un
fotógrafo notorio en mi pueblo, con mi computadora puedo crear fotos que no
existen nada más que en momentos de mi mente enajenada.
Pero no
todo es color de rosa con mi computadora, hay veces que tengo peleas profundas
con ella.
Se me
congela cuando menos lo pienso, aunque tenga que reconocer que fue mi falta por
meter el dedo donde no debía, pero a veces he estado tentado a
destruirla de un martillazo.
Porque mi
computadora funciona de una manera muy parecida a mi abogado y mi médico,
está llena de información, pero hay que tener la habilidad para podérsela
extraer convenientemente.
Todo
depende de los programas que le ponga y de cómo sepa manejarlos, porque la
computadora puede ser incompetente en sí misma, esto es, incapaz de realizar y
regular con exactitud el trabajo para el que fue diseñada ella o el programa
que estamos usando. Porque depende del lugar y las personas que la
diseñaron.
Aun
cuando sea competente en sí misma, la computadora amplifica enormemente los
resultados de la incompetencia de su operador, en este caso yo mismo.
La
computadora es igual que un empleado humano, se halla sometida al principio de
la incompetencia innata en todo ser humano, porque funciona según la manejamos
los humanos.
No sé si
han oído el cuento de la computadora comparado a una mujer, pero es así:
El grupo
de hombres llegó a la conclusión de que la computadora era sin lugar
a dudas del género femenino porque……
1- Nadie,
salvo su creador, entiende su lógica interna.
2- El
lenguaje que utiliza para dialogar con otra computadora es completamente
incomprensible.
3- Guarda
el más mínimo error en memoria para sacarlo en el momento más inoportuno.
4- En
cuanto te decides por una, te das cuenta de que tienes que gastar la mitad de
tus entradas en accesorios.
Pero no
me imagino como pudiera vivir mi vida sin mi computadora, es mi compañera en el
trabajo, en mi casa, cuando viajo.
Usando
una frase de las novelas cursis, no sé cómo pude vivir sin ella antes de
conocerla.
Egypt Bombs Islamic State Targets in Libya After 21 Egyptians
Beheaded
Egyptian jets bombed Islamic State targets in Libya on
Monday, a day after the group there released a video showing the beheading of
21 Egyptian Christians, drawing Cairo directly into the conflict across its
border.
Egypt said the pre-dawn strike hit militant camps, training sites
and weapons storage areas in neighbouring Libya, where civil conflict has
plunged the country into near anarchy and created havens for armed factions.
While Cairo is believed to have provided clandestine support to a
Libyan general fighting a rogue government in Tripoli, the mass killings pushed
President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi into open action, expanding his battle against
Islamist militancy.
"And let those near and far know that the Egyptians have a
shield that protects and preserves the security of the country, and a sword
that eradicates terrorism," the military said.
Egyptian state television aired footage of fighter planes leaving
a hangar with "Long live Egypt" emblazoned on the tails, followed by
night-vision aerial footage showing bomb explosions and the aircraft returning
in early daylight.
Libya's air force also participated in Monday's attack, which
targeted Derna, an eastern coastal city seen as a base for Islamic State
fighters in the oil-rich nation.
"There are casualties among individuals, ammunition and the
(Islamic State) communication centres," Libyan air force commander Saqer
al-Joroushi told Egyptian state television, adding that dozens were killed.
Joroushi, who is loyal to Libya's internationally recognised
government that set up camp in the city of Tobruk after losing control of
Tripoli, said there would be more strikes on Tuesday.
The rival Tripoli-based parliament, which is supported by some
Islamist groups, said the strike was an assault on the country's sovereignty.
Omar al-Hassi, the premier of the self-declared Tripoli government, said three
children, two elderly men and a 21-year-old woman were killed in the attack.
It was not possible to confirm either factions' accounts of the
number or nature of the casualties.
Cairo called on the U.S.-led coalition fighting Islamic State in Iraq and Syria to broaden the scope of their operations to include Libya, highlighting how the militant group has expanded its reach around the Arab world.
Cairo called on the U.S.-led coalition fighting Islamic State in Iraq and Syria to broaden the scope of their operations to include Libya, highlighting how the militant group has expanded its reach around the Arab world.
Since the fall of strongman Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, a number of
Islamist movements have taken hold in Libya. Recently, some have declared ties
to Islamic State and claimed high-profile attacks in what appears to be an
intensifying campaign.
The U.S. military estimated in December that only around 200
Islamic State fighters were operating in the country.
Egypt is not the only Arab nation sucked into confrontation with
the group by the gruesome killings of its citizens.
Jordan has taken a leading role in conducting air strikes against
the group in Syria and Iraq this month after the militants released a video
showing a captured Jordanian pilot being burned alive in a cage.
The 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians were marched to a beach, forced
to kneel and then beheaded on video, which was broadcast via a website that
supports Islamic State.
The victims were among thousands of unemployed Egyptians
desperately seeking work in Libya, despite the risks. Egypt's foreign ministry
said it was banning travel to Libya and had set up a crisis centre to bring
home Egyptians.
Before the videoed killings, one of the militants stood with a
knife in his hand and said: "Safety for you crusaders is something you can
only wish for." Afterwards, he says: "And we will conquer Rome, by
the will of Allah."
The head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Francis, condemned the
beheadings. "They were killed simply for the fact that they were
Christians," he said at the Vatican. "It makes no difference whether
they be Catholics, Orthodox, Copts or Protestants. They are Christians!"
Egypt's Coptic Christian pope was one of the public figures who
backed Sisi when he, as army chief, ousted Islamist president Mohamed Mursi in
2013 after mass protests against him.
The killings put pressure on Sisi to show he is in control of
national security, even as he makes progress against Islamist militant
insurgents in the Sinai, some of whom have recently pledged allegiance to Islamic
State.
"It's swift and decisive, it's not about strategy, it's about
containing anger within Egypt," said Hassan Hassan, co-author of a book on
Islamic State.
"Just like in Jordan, it's more about saving face, saying:
'You can't mess with us'. .... It's likely to evolve into a sustained strategy
of helping in the fight against ISIS (Islamic State) in neighbouring
countries."
Fears the crisis in Libya could spill across the border had
already prompted Egypt, the Arab world's most populous nation, to upgrade its
military hardware.
France has said Egypt will order 24 Rafale fighter jets, a naval
frigate and other equipment in a deal to be signed in Cairo on Monday worth
more than 5 billion euros ($5.7 billion).
French President Francois Hollande said on Monday that he and Sisi
wanted the United Nations Security Council to discuss Libya and take new
measures against the Islamic State.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/egypt-bombs-isis-libya/2015/02/16/id/625016/#ixzz3RwaaIP8F
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/egypt-bombs-isis-libya/2015/02/16/id/625016/#ixzz3RwaaIP8F
Amenper: ISIS Has Said it Will Behead
People for Smoking…
Rashid, an old Kurdish
peshmerga fighter, smoking a cigarette in the Kurdish-held portion of northern
Iraq. ISIS, which controls parts of Syria, Iraq and Libya, has said that
smoking is punishable by death. (Getty)
A severed head with a
cigarette in its mouth was found last month in the ISIS-held Syrian city of
Al-Mayadeen, as was reported by the Los Angeles Times. On the corpse
nearby, “This is not permissible, Sheikh,” had been written in Arabic.
ISIS’ strict interpretation of
Sharia law has classified smoking as “slow suicide,” and therefore not
acceptable.
As the “ISIS Preaching Office”
said in a statement last year:
“Every smoker should be aware
that with every cigarette he smokes in a state of trance and vanity is
disobeying god. Three days following the issuance of the statement,
selling tobacco and shisha will be strictly prohibited and those who insist on
selling them will bring injustice upon themselves and upon other people. All
tobacco quantities will be burned and the seller will be punished according to
Sharia.”
Bueno después de todo, ISIS está teniendo una coincidencia
con los que, a nombre de la civilización y la ciencia nos inundan con
anuncios y regulaciones para que las personas dejen de fumar. Creo
que este método para evitar que la gente fume de ISIS debe de tener muy
buenos resultados y quizás sea usado en los Estados Unido por la EPA
(Envioranmental Portection Agency) que tiene un estilo regulatorio parecido a
la ley Sharia.
Por lo menos en mí ha logrado
lo que ni mi mujer ni las regulaciones del gobierno y los consejos de los
ambientalistas han logrado. Leyendo esto estoy pensando en no fumar
mi tabaquitos cotidianos, porque tengo un gran apego a mi calva cabeza.
White House Statement on Coptic Christian Beheadings Has Two
Major Omissions
·
Share This
·
Tweet This
·
·
The White House released a strongly worded statement Sunday
condemning the killing of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians by
Islamic State-affiliated militants in Libya, but did not name the religions of
the victims or of the perpetrators.
In the video released Sunday purporting
to show the mass execution on a Libyan beach, militants emphasized their
captives’ faith, calling them “crusaders.” The video was titled “The people of
the cross, followers of the hostile Egyptian church,” certainly suggesting the
Christians were targeted because of their religion.
The group that posted the video called itself the Tripoli
Province of the Islamic State group, according to the Associated
Press. Multiple news outlets reported — and the Coptic Christian church in
Egypt confirmed — that the captives were
Christians.
White House press secretary Josh
Earnest during the daily press briefing, Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2015, at the White
House in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
White House press secretary Josh
Earnest condemned the “despicable and cowardly murder of twenty-one Egyptian
citizens in Libya by ISIL-affiliated terrorists.”
“ISIL’s barbarity knows no bounds. It
is unconstrained by faith, sect or ethnicity,” Earnest said, using the White
House’s term for the Islamic State. He called it a “heinous act” and a “wanton
killing of innocents.”
While the White House statement did not mention Christian
victims or Islamic extremists, it did call the attackers
“terrorists.” That stood in contrast with a statement released Saturday by
National Security Council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan condemning Saturday’s
deadly shooting at a free speech event in Denmark that did not use the word “terrorist” to
describe the incident – a word used by the Danish prime minister.
Meehan called the shooting
“deplorable.”
In a statement issued Sunday, a day after Meehan’s
statement, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki condemned the
Denmark shootings, characterizing them as “terrorist attacks.”
“The United States condemns the
terrorist attacks that took place over the weekend in Copenhagen, Denmark,”
Psaki said, referring to the shootings at the free speech event and one later
at a synagogue. “The people of the United States stand united with the people
of Denmark and all others who defend the universal right of freedom of speech
and stand against anti-Semitism and bigotry in all its forms.”
Danish media Sunday named the suspected gunman as
Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein, 22, who was born in Denmark and was released
from jail two weeks ago after serving a term for aggravated assault.
Two people were killed in the
Copenhagen attacks. Police later shot and killed El-Hussein.
Franklin Graham: 'Storm Is Coming' After 21 Christians Beheaded
The Rev. Franklin Graham called on Muslim leaders to
condemn the beheadings of 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians by Islamic State (ISIS)
militants, warning a "storm is coming."
In a Facebook post on Monday, the son of the Rev. Billy Graham and head of the Christian relief group Samaritan's Purse said that there would have been an outcry if 21 Muslims had been beheaded by Christians.
"Where is the universal condemnation by Muslim leaders around the world?" Graham wrote.
He said the graphic video, titled "A Message Signed With Blood to The Nation of the Cross" should be taken as a serious warning and that such acts of terror will only spread across Europe and the United States if they are ignored.
In a Facebook post on Monday, the son of the Rev. Billy Graham and head of the Christian relief group Samaritan's Purse said that there would have been an outcry if 21 Muslims had been beheaded by Christians.
"Where is the universal condemnation by Muslim leaders around the world?" Graham wrote.
He said the graphic video, titled "A Message Signed With Blood to The Nation of the Cross" should be taken as a serious warning and that such acts of terror will only spread across Europe and the United States if they are ignored.
"If this concerns you like it does me, share
this. The storm is coming," Graham wrote.
ISIS released the video on Sunday of the 21 Egyptian men who were kidnapped while working in Libya.
A statement in the ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq said, "It is important for Muslims everywhere to know that there is no doubt in the great reward to be found on Judgment Day for those who spill the blood of these Coptic crusaders wherever they may be found," CNS News reported.
The statement also accused the Copts, who are an Orthodox Christian minority in Egypt, of following Pope Shenouda III, who led the church from 1971 until he died in 2012, and of "the taghut [idolator] Sisi."
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is hated by the Islamist militants.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Franklin-Graham-ISIS-Christians-Libya/2015/02/16/id/625053/#ixzz3S0mGXRFr
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
ISIS released the video on Sunday of the 21 Egyptian men who were kidnapped while working in Libya.
A statement in the ISIS propaganda magazine Dabiq said, "It is important for Muslims everywhere to know that there is no doubt in the great reward to be found on Judgment Day for those who spill the blood of these Coptic crusaders wherever they may be found," CNS News reported.
The statement also accused the Copts, who are an Orthodox Christian minority in Egypt, of following Pope Shenouda III, who led the church from 1971 until he died in 2012, and of "the taghut [idolator] Sisi."
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is hated by the Islamist militants.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Franklin-Graham-ISIS-Christians-Libya/2015/02/16/id/625053/#ixzz3S0mGXRFr
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
OBAMA FAIL: Texas Federal Judge Halts
Obama Immigration Policy
Good
for Texas. Rule of law should play a role somewhere here in the USA and I’m
glad Texas is setting the example.
Slate:
College Students Are Children And Do Not Deserve Free Speech Rights
...do
not deserve free speech or due process rights.
Eric Posner- a professor at the
University of Chicago and son of famed judge Richard Posner- makes the case in Slate that college students are
children and thus do not deserve free speech or due process rights.
Posner writes:
Conservatives and libertarians
are up in arms. They see these rules as an assault on free speech and
individual liberty. They think universities are treating students like
children. And they are right. But they have also not considered that the
justification for these policies may lie hidden in plain sight: that
students are children. Not in terms of
age, but in terms of maturity. Even in college, they must be protected like
children while being prepared to be adults.
Furthermore, he writes that
“sincere expressions of opinion about same-sex marriage or campaign finance
reform” are “out of place even in philosophy and politics classes, where the
goal is to educate students (usually about academic texts and theories), not to
listen to them spout off.”
Posner thinks that universities
create speech and sex codes because “that’s what most students want.” He
then says: “If students want to learn biology and art history in an environment
where they needn’t worry about being offended or raped, why shouldn’t they?”
In response to the argument that
college students are children, Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
President Greg Lukianoff argues:
But that’s definitely an argument
that people should make that straight out, but you run into a couple moral and
philosophical problems with that.
One of them is the moral and
philosophical underpinnings of the 26th Amendment. Essentially, we have
decided in this country that 18-year-olds… that is considered the age for
majority.
We also send our 18-year-olds to
war. Unless you’re actually also willing to make the argument that nobody
below the age of, I don’t know, 22 should go to war, and we repealed the 26th
Amendment, we’ve got a serious problem.
Are college students
children who deserve to be subjected to liberal speech codes? Feel free to
share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/slate-college-students-children-not-deserve-free-speech-rights/#5QMlRQBSmQtAXqqP.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/slate-college-students-children-not-deserve-free-speech-rights/#5QMlRQBSmQtAXqqP.99
Attention, San Fran Nan:
Government dependency kills jobs
Unemployment
Benefits Extension Debate
Being a San Francisco liberal
means never having to say you’re sorry. Or wrong. Take Nancy Pelosi, please.
Five years ago, California’s
genius Bay Area Democrat declared that government unemployment checks generate
job growth. Yes, really. “Let me say about unemployment insurance,” she told
reporters, “this is one of the biggest stimuluses (sic) to our economy.
Economists will tell you, this money is spent quickly. It injects demand into
the economy and is job creating.”
She babbled on: “It creates
jobs faster than almost any other initiative you can name, because, again, it
is money that is needed for families to survive, and it is spent. So it has a
double benefit. It helps those who’ve lost their jobs, but it also is a job
creator.”
What Crazy-Cakes Pelosi failed
to mention, however, is the long-established conclusion of labor economists
from all parts of the political spectrum that extending unemployment insurance
benefits prolongs unemployment. While she heralded the short-term effects on
consumer spending, she ignored the blindingly obvious: Outside the land of
progressive make-believe, workers respond to incentives. Over the long term,
subsidizing joblessness creates more of it.
I bring this all up because a
new paper from the venerable, nonpartisan National Bureau of Economic Research
concludes that the recent job gains Pelosi and the Democrats are now crowing
about may be due to the very policy they fought so hard against: ending
extended unemployment benefits.
“We find that a 1 percent drop
in benefit duration leads to a statistically significant increase of employment
by 0.0161 log points,” the NBER economists reported. In practical terms, it
means that “1.8 million additional jobs were created in 2014 due to the benefit
cut.” Take note: “Almost 1 million of these jobs were filled by workers from
out of the labor force who would not have participated in the labor market had
benefit extensions been reauthorized.”
The jobs bump coincided with
the expiration of the 99-week UI benefits extension passed as part of the Obama
stimulus package. Remember: Laid-off workers were already collecting up to 79
weeks of unemployment in half of the states before the last extension.
Democrats were pushing for yet another 13-week extension that would have cost
tens of billions of dollars more. The cost of the joint federal-state program
is borne by employers who pay state and federal taxes on a portion of wages
paid to each employee in a calendar year.
Remarkably, the NBER analysis
attributed “61 percent of the aggregate employment growth in 2014″ to the
congressional cutoff in unemployment benefits at the end of 2013. Here’s the
NBER team’s bottom line for Pelosi and her fellow unemployment benefits cheerleaders:
“The findings in this paper imply that the negative effects of unemployment
benefit extensions on employment far outweigh the potential stimulative effects
often ascribed to this policy.”
This vindication comes after a
hyperbolic campaign by Democrats accusing Republicans of “meanness” and
“obstruction” for opposing “temporary” unemployment benefits that have become
enshrined permanently.
But it’s not just partisan
hacks in Washington who’ve so falsely demonized those opposed to endless
unemployment checks as a “job creation” vehicle. During the contentious debate
over extending UI checks as part of the Obama stimulus in 2009, I argued on an
ABC “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” panel, “If you put enough government
cheese in front of people, they are just going to keep eating it.” Atlanta
Journal-Constitution columnist Cynthia Tucker took offense, mischaracterizing
standard economic arguments for moral judgment. “Does the right really believe
the unemployed are lazy?” she wailed.
The left-leaning journalism
outfit at PolitiFact jumped on board, rating my 100 percent-true reference to
decades of labor economics literature on UI’s impact on joblessness
“half-true.” And the George Soros-funded hitmen of Media Matters called me and
several other conservatives “reality”-deniers for stating the bloody obvious
about UI’s warped incentives — even though their favorite “progressive”
economist Paul Krugman acknowledged that “everyone agrees that really generous
unemployment benefits, by reducing the incentive to seek jobs, can raise the
NAIRU” (the minimum rate of unemployment consistent with a stable inflation
rate).
The politicians posing as
economy-healers and the political operatives posing as journalists will no
doubt find clever ways to slice, dice and explain away the latest NBER
findings. But this simple truth endures: Government dependency doesn’t “create”
jobs. It kills them.
Michelle Malkin is the author
of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and
Cronies” (Regnery 2010).
Who has most
racist views…Democrat or Republicans?
I have no doubt that
Democrats are the most racist (and vile) people on the planet. Most don’t even
realize just how racist they are, since they usually don’t possess the
intellect to see “outcomes.’
Further, Democrats LOOK
for racism in everything, incapable of just taking things at face value.
Nevertheless, much of the
public believes the Madison Avenue sales job that Republicans are the most
racist.
Al Sharpton Dodges Racism Debate at Oxford Union, Will
Deliver Prepared Speech
The General Social Survey, conducted by
the University of Chicago, affirms the fact that there are only minor
differences between rank-and-file Democrats and rank-and-file Republicans with
regard to racism.
See article
————————————————————————————————————-
Caveat:
Social desirability bias
is a social science research term that describes the tendency of survey respondents to
answer questions in a manner that will be viewed favorably by others. It can
take the form of over-reporting “good behavior” or under-reporting “bad”, or
undesirable behavior. The tendency poses a serious problem with conducting
research with self-reports, especially questionnaires. This bias interferes with
the interpretation of average tendencies as well as individual differences.
————————————————————————————————————-
In
1988 when Jesse Jackson was running for the Democratic nomination, 23 percent of white Democrats said they wouldn’t
vote for a black president, compared to 19 percent of white Republicans.
In 2008, when Obama was a candidate
rather than a president, the numbers were about equal ( 5% ) among Republicans
and Democrats.
In 1990, 65 percent of white Democrats
and 71 percent of white Republicans said they’d object to an interracial
marriage of a close relative.
From
1990 to 2008, white Republicans were just slightly more likely than white
Democrats to say they considered blacks to be more “unintelligent” than
“intelligent.” However, the numbers have fallen over time, and the small
partisan gap erased itself in 2010 and 2012, under Obama’s presidency. [Under Obama, I would not be surprised to see this
number go way up, given that he was supposed to be SO smart.]
A 1989 poll shows that approximately
63% of white Republicans and 63% of white Democrats believed that blacks lack
the motivation to pull themselves out of poverty.
In 2004, approximately the same
percentage ( 32%) of white Republicans and white Democrats opposed a close
relative marrying a black person.
In 2006, 37% of white Republicans and
36% of white Democrats said blacks are “more lazy” than “hard-working”.
The 2009 survey showed that the
percentage of white Democrats and white Republicans who oppose living in a half
black neighborhood was tied at 20%.
A 2008 survey shows the percentage of
whites who say they do not feel close to blacks at 10% for both parties.
In 2004, 18% of white Republicans, and
15% of white Democrats said they believed the federal government was spending
too much money on improving conditions for blacks.
On average, between the 2004 and 2006
editions of the surveys — the last two before Obama was either a president or a
candidate — the index of negative racial attitudes stood at 22 percent for
white Democrats and 26 percent for white Republicans. Those values are within
the margin of error.
NOTEWORTHY:
If there’s a discouraging trend, it’s
not so much that negative racial attitudes toward blacks have increased in
these polls, but that they’ve failed to decrease under Obama, as they did so
clearly for most of the past three decades.
I completely get most of these
statistics. Sure there are some knuckledragging Neanderthals who are just race
bigots, but most of them are “old school” folks, with one foot in the grave and
another on a banana peel. By the way, if you poll black people, you would get
some astoundingly racist statistics against whites.
Thanks for all the racial healing,
Barack Obama. Read more at http://theblacksphere.net/2015/02/racist-views-democrat-republicans/
Obama Won’t Call Beheaded Victims Christians; Goes Golfing
Obama is such a wimp and makes it easy for Islamic State to
continue to grow.
Check it out:
Check it out:
It is well-known that the pro-Muslim Obama White House will not
call Islamic terrorism, Islamic terrorism. Nor were the Jews murdered by
Islamists in a Jewish deli in France allowed to be called Jews, instead, Obama
referred to them as “random” and “folks.”
The same regime that said “you can keep your policy” and “you
didn’t build that” has a problem with the truth, especially when it comes to
painting Islam, the “religion of peace” that’s responsible for almost all
terrorism in the world, in any kind of negative light.
And now, following the horrific beheadings of 21 Coptic Christians
over the weekend by ISIS (who the regime still calls “ISIL”), Obama immediately
went golfing to celebrate mourn, while his mouthpieces were given the marching
orders to not say that those slaughtered were Christians and that is the reason
why the barbaric Islamic monsters brutally beheaded them.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/02/obama-wont-call-beheaded-victims-christians-goes-golfing/
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/02/obama-wont-call-beheaded-victims-christians-goes-golfing/
Were Obama’s ‘Crusade’ Comments Responsible for
Latest Beheadings of Christians?
Fox
News reported that “a video released on Sunday by militants in Libya claiming
loyalty to the Islamic State terror group purports to show the mass beheading
of Coptic Christian hostages.
The
video, which appeared on the Twitter feed of a website that supports Islamic
State, depicts several men in orange jumpsuits being led along a beach, each
accompanied by a masked militant. The men are made to kneel and one militant,
dressed differently than the others, addresses the camera in North
American-accented English.”
The
latest reports have confirmed the murders of these committed Christians:
“Even
under the blade, some were making their last prayers and as the blade came to
their neck they all cried in unison ‘Ya
Rabbi Yasou’ (O My
Lord Jesus) the caption by ISIS stated ‘these insisted to remain in unbelief.’
In other words, they were given the option to convert or die and every one of
them refused, even unto death.”
This
is the important part from one of the murdering Muslims:
"All
crusaders: safety for you will be only wishes, especially if you are fighting
us all together. Therefore we will fight you all together. The sea you have
hidden Sheikh Osama Bin Laden's body in, we swear to Allah we will mix it with
your blood."
You
may recall how President Obama in his National Prayer Breakfast speech
described a moral equivalency between modern-day Islamic barbarity with the
Crusades that took place more than 500 years ago in response to Islamic
oppression.
“The
Crusades were an effort ‘to defend Christians in the Middle East who were being
slaughtered by Muslims’ after the Muslim conquest of Christian Jerusalem in 638
AD, wrote Douglas Murray for the Gatestone Institute.”
Read more: "Did the Inquisition Really Kill
50 Million People": Historical Revisionism Gone off the Rails.
Here’s
what Obama said:
“Lest
we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember
that during the Crusades and the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds
in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often
was justified in the name of Christ.”
Were
these comments by President Obama viewed by the beheading Islamists as a way to
justify their actions? It’s payback for the Crusades – moral equivalency in
action!
The
original reason for the Crusades is happening again:
"The
killings raise the possibility that ISIS, which controls about a third of those
countries in a self-declared caliphate, has established a direct affiliate less
than 500 miles from the southern tip of Italy. One of the militants in the
video makes direct reference to that possibility, saying the group now plans to
'conquer Rome.'"
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/20437/obamas-crusade-comments-responsible-latest-beheadings-christians/#pLqWqs0eT0DusVMT.99
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/20437/obamas-crusade-comments-responsible-latest-beheadings-christians/#pLqWqs0eT0DusVMT.99
DUMB WH BLONDE: State Dept Spox on
ISIS, ‘We Can’t Win This War By Killing Them…They Need More Job Opportunities’
State Department
Representative Marie Harf told Chris Matthews that the answer to fighting ISIS
is not killing them, but helping them to have more job opportunities. Yeah,
that’ll work. It has nothing to do with their insane ‘religion of peace’.
MATTHEWS: How do we stop this? I
don’t see it. I see the Shia militias coming out of Baghdad who are all Shia.
The Sunnis hate them. The Sunnis are loyal to ISIS rather than going in with
the Shia. You’ve got the Kurds, the Jordanian air force and now the Egyptian
air force. But i don’t see any — If i were ISIS, I wouldn’t be afraid right
now. I can figure there is no existential threat to these people. They can keep
finding places where they can hold executions and putting the camera work
together, getting their props ready and killing people for show. And nothing we
do right now seems to be directed at stopping this.
HARF: Well, I think there’s
a few stages here. Right now what we’re doing is trying to take their leaders
and their fighters off the battlefield in Iraq and Syria. That’s really where
they flourish.
MATTHEWS: Are we killing enough
of them?
HARF: We’re killing a lot of
them and we’re going to keep killing more of them. So are the Egyptians, so are
the Jordanians. They’re in this fight with us. But we cannot win this war by
killing them. We cannot kill our way out of this war. We need in the medium to
longer term to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups,
whether it’s lack of opportunity for jobs, whether —
MATTHEWS: We’re not going to be
able to stop that in our lifetime or fifty lifetimes. There’s always going to
be poor people. There’s always going to be poor muslims, and as long as there
are poor Muslims, the trumpet’s blowing and they’ll join. We can’t stop that,
can we?
HARF: We can work with
countries around the world to help improve their governance. We can help them
build their economies so they can have job opportunities for these people…
Judge Blocks Obama's Deferred Deportation Policy for
Undocumented Immigrants
A
federal judge in Texas on Monday issued a preliminary
injunction blocking the U.S.
government from enacting President
Barack Obama's executive order on immigration to defer deportations for up to 5
million undocumented immigrants.
U.S.
District Judge Andrew S. Hanen of the Southern District of Texas temporarily
blocked the federal government from implementing "any and all
aspects" of the order, which protected millions of people in the country
illegally from immediate deportation.
Hanen's
ruling allows a lawsuit filed by Texas and 25 other states challenging Obama's
executive order to go forward.
In
a memorandum accompanying his order, Hanen wrote that the lawsuit should go
forward and that without a preliminary injunction the states will "suffer
irreparable harm in this case."
"The
genie would be impossible to put back into the bottle," he wrote, adding
that he agreed with the plaintiffs' argument that legalizing the presence of
millions of people is a "virtually irreversible" action.
In
his ruling,
Hanen said the Obama administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act.
The
preliminary injunction applies to the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans
and Lawful Permanent residents, better known as DAPA, and expansions to the
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, both of which Obama announced in
November. DAPA, part of which was set to go into effect on Wednesday, would
grant work permits and defer deportation for three years of undocumented
immigrants who are both parents of U.S. citizens and who've been living in the
U.S. since 2010.
"This
decision is a victory for the rule of law in America and a crucial first step
in reining in President Obama's lawlessness," Texas Attorney General Ken
Paxton, who is leading the lawsuit against the Obama administration, said in a
statement. "This injunction makes it clear that the president is not a law
unto himself, and must work with our elected leaders in Congress and satisfy
the courts in a fashion our Founding Fathers envisioned."
Texas
Governor Greg Abbott added: "President Obama abdicated his responsibility
to uphold the United States Constitution when he attempted to circumvent the
laws passed by Congress via executive fiat, and Judge Hanen's decision rightly
stops the president's overreach in its tracks."
However,
White House press secretary Josh Earnest said in a statement that "the
Department of Justice, legal scholars, immigration experts, and the district
court in Washington, D.C. have determined that the president's actions are well
within his legal authority."
He
added: "The district court's decision wrongly prevents these lawful,
commonsense policies from taking effect and the Department of Justice has
indicated that it will appeal that decision."
An
appeal would be heard by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans.
FRANKLIN GRAHAM: What If 21 Muslims
were Beheaded by Christians?
Reverend Franklin Graham
issued a eery warning today saying, “the storm is coming”, in response to ISIS
murdering 21 Egyptian Coptic Christians. See the full text of it below via
Facebook: http://clashdaily.com/2015/02/franklin-graham-21-muslims-beheaded-christians/
BASTA YA / ENOUGH IS
ENOUGH
Saquemos a estos politicos / votemos en su
contra. El futuro del pais esta en nuestras manos.
Como es posible que una persona que nunca trabaja en
este pais viva mejor que un obrero que dejo su juventud en una
factoria...Ustedes los politicos que apoyan esto...¿ No les da
Verguenza ?. Fwd: RV: ¿CUANDO VAMOS A APRENDER DE ELLOS?
¿Recordáis la madre musulmana, residente en
España, que protestó porque había un Crucifijo en la
clase y eso ofendía a su hijo y casi le dan la
razón?
Pues lean, lean...
Legislación para extranjeros inmigrantes:
1. No habrá programas de lenguas extranjeras en las escuelas.
España, que protestó porque había un Crucifijo en la
clase y eso ofendía a su hijo y casi le dan la
razón?
Pues lean, lean...
Legislación para extranjeros inmigrantes:
1. No habrá programas de lenguas extranjeras en las escuelas.
2. Todos los anuncios del gobierno y las elecciones
se desarrollaran en lengua nacional.
se desarrollaran en lengua nacional.
3. Todas las cuestiones administrativas tendrán
lugar en nuestra lengua.
lugar en nuestra lengua.
4. Los extranjeros no serán una carga para los
contribuyentes. No tendrán seguridad social, ni
indemnización para comidas, no tendrán asistencia
contribuyentes. No tendrán seguridad social, ni
indemnización para comidas, no tendrán asistencia
sanitaria, ninguna otra ventaja pública le será
acordada.
Cualquier abuso provocará su expulsión.
5. Los extranjeros podrán invertir en este
país, pero
el importe mínimo tendrá que ser igual a 40.000 veces el salario mínimo.
el importe mínimo tendrá que ser igual a 40.000 veces el salario mínimo.
6.Si los extranjeros compran bienes inmuebles,
sus
posibilidades están limitadas. Ciertos terrenos,
en
particular bienes inmuebles que tengan acceso al agua
corriente, serán reservados para los ciudadanos nacidos
aquí.
particular bienes inmuebles que tengan acceso al agua
corriente, serán reservados para los ciudadanos nacidos
aquí.
7.Los extranjeros no pueden protestar en nuestro
país. Ningún tipo de manifestación, ninguna
utilización
de una bandera extranjera, ninguna organización política.
de una bandera extranjera, ninguna organización política.
Ninguna calumnia dirigida hacia nuestro país, el
gobierno y su política.
Toda violación conducirá a la expulsión.
8. Si alguien penetra a este país ilegalmente,
será acosado
sin piedad. Detenido, y retenido hasta que sea expulsado. Todos sus bienes serán confiscados.
Los artículos arriba
sin piedad. Detenido, y retenido hasta que sea expulsado. Todos sus bienes serán confiscados.
Los artículos arriba
detallados, son las reglas de inmigración vigentes en
Arabia Saudita y en Emiratos Árabes Unidos.
Arabia Saudita y en Emiratos Árabes Unidos.
“En mi opinión”
No 869 Febrero 17, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
No comments:
Post a Comment