No 859 “En mi
opinión”
Febrero 4, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Amenper: Estancamiento de la Historia
Política
No soy historiador, no tengo los conocimientos amplios de la historia, que
puede y debe tener un historiador. Conocimientos cómo los que tiene
Paul Johnson, el historiador británico al cual admiro por su acertada
descripción de los hechos sucedidos en diferentes etapas te la historia y su
compresión de los motivos socioeconómicos que se desarrollan en el contexto de
la historia.
Pero estaba leyendo un escrito de Johnson sobre algo de lo que yo creo
tener tanto conocimiento como Johnson, no por estudios, pero por la experiencia
personal vivida.
Yo creo que cada cubano de mi generación, es una enciclopedia viviente de como
se genera una revolución política y los hombres que la dirigen.
Johnson dice que estos hombres que dirigen estas revoluciones, son o
románticos idealistas o religiosos, y ambos fanáticos sobre sus ideas.
Yo creo que conociendo nuestro caso hay que decirle a Johnson que hay una
tercera clase, que son los hijos de puta.
Pero dentro de eso, vamos a considerar que tiene razón Johnson y que
tenemos razón nosotros también, y vamos a clasificarlos en dos solamente, los
hijos de puta románticos y los hijos de puta religiosos.
Johnson nos dice que Lenin era de la primera categoría, los románticos
idealistas.
Sus padres eran cristianos. La religión era importante para él, en el
sentido que la odiaba.
A diferencia de Marx, quien desdeñaba la religión y la trató como marginal,
Lenin la veía como un enemigo poderoso y omnipresente. 'No puede haber nada más
abominable,' escribió, 'que la religión".
Desde el principio, el estado socialista crea y mantiene, hasta el día de
hoy una enorme propaganda académica contra la religión.
Lenin no era sólo anticlerical como Stalin, que no le gustaba a sacerdotes
porque eran corruptos.
Por el contrario, Lenin no tenía ningún sentimiento adverso sobre
sacerdotes corruptos, porque eran repelidos fácilmente. Los hombres realmente
temía y odiaba y más tarde perseguía, fueron los devotos.
El más puro la religión, el más peligroso. Un cristiano dedicado,
argumentó, es mucho más influyente que un egoísta e inmoral. Los cristianos que
más necesitaba suprimir no era aquellos comprometidos con la explotación y la
corrupción, pero aquellos que eran horrados expresaron su solidaridad con los
necesitados.. Era como si él hubiera reconocido en el verdadero hombre de Dios,
el mismo celo y espíritu que lo animó a sí mismo y deseaba eliminarlo por ser
un peligroso enemigo.
Ningún hombre mejor personifica mejor que Lenin o sus seguidores el
reemplazo del impulso religioso por la voluntad de poder.
Pero Johnson también nos dice que quizás en un tiempo más temprano en la
historia, Lenin seguramente habría sido un líder religioso.
Con su extraordinaria pasión por la fuerza, podría haber pensado en
legiones como las de Mahoma, para imponer sus ideas. O en los poderosos
ejércitos de la iglesia Romana de los años de oscurantismo o el renacimiento
del poder papal del Sacro Imperio Romano o del protestantismo de Juan Calviño,
con su creencia en la estructura organizativa, su habilidad para crear uno y
luego dominar totalmente, con su puritanismo, su santurronería apasionado y
sobretodo su intolerancia.
Gracias a Dios, las pocas teocracias occidentales de las variaciones del
Cristianismo, han desaparecido o son nominales como en Costa Rica, Bélgica e
Inglaterra.
Pero lo que vemos es que la teocracia que se ha mantenido, no sólo vigente,
sino que más radical es la del Islam, y quizás es porque el Islam no es una
religión, sino una institución creada para implementar una revolución y
establecer un estado tiránico. Como es su diseño, no puede cambiar,
no puede evolucionar, porque sería su desaparición.
Por esto ahora, en el siglo XXI, no sólo nos vemos con las revoluciones de
los hijos de puta idealistas del socialismo, pero también tenemos que soportar
las revoluciones de los hijos de putas de la religión.
Tal parece que la historia se ha detenido, estamos en un estancamiento de
la historia política.
Jesus Marzo Fernandez: DOS CUBANOS
PARA RESPETAR
En el dia de ayer fuimos testigos, para mi, de un hecho historico e
e inolvidable , la discusion del Tema Cuba, en la subcomision del senado de
los EEUU.
Que orgullo y alegria daba, ver a dos senadores, de politicas diametralmente
opuestas , ambos de gran calibre en sus respectivos partidos, uno Republicano
y otro Democrata, analizando y discutiendo apasionadamente el tema Cuba.
Ah, pero cuando de Cuba se trata, no hay partidos , somos cubanos, y tenemos
que batirnos juntos. Que leccion han dado estas 2 grandes figuras de la politica
norteamericana. Tenemos que sentirnos orgullosos.
Les recomiendo a los que piensan con el bolsillo que aprendan de los hombres de los
cuales ""LA PATRIA Y TODOS LOS CUBANOS NOS SENTIMOS ORGULLOSOS""
DOS HOMBRES PARA VENERAR Y RESPETAR
MARCOS RUBIO Y BOB MENENDEZ
En el dia de ayer fuimos testigos, para mi, de un hecho historico e
e inolvidable , la discusion del Tema Cuba, en la subcomision del senado de
los EEUU.
Que orgullo y alegria daba, ver a dos senadores, de politicas diametralmente
opuestas , ambos de gran calibre en sus respectivos partidos, uno Republicano
y otro Democrata, analizando y discutiendo apasionadamente el tema Cuba.
Ah, pero cuando de Cuba se trata, no hay partidos , somos cubanos, y tenemos
que batirnos juntos. Que leccion han dado estas 2 grandes figuras de la politica
norteamericana. Tenemos que sentirnos orgullosos.
Les recomiendo a los que piensan con el bolsillo que aprendan de los hombres de los
cuales ""LA PATRIA Y TODOS LOS CUBANOS NOS SENTIMOS ORGULLOSOS""
DOS HOMBRES PARA VENERAR Y RESPETAR
MARCOS RUBIO Y BOB MENENDEZ
Amenper: Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi,
Martin Luther King….y Pedro Luis Boitel
Que todos los hombres son por naturaleza igualmente libres e
independientes, y tienen ciertos derechos inherentes, de los cuales, cuando entran
en un estado de sociedad, no pueden ser privados o postergados; en esencia, el
gozo de la vida y la libertad, junto a los medios de adquirir y poseer
propiedades, y la búsqueda y obtención de la felicidad y la seguridad.
ESTE ES EL
PRIMER PÁRRAFO DE LA DECLARACIÓN DE DERECHOS DE VIRGINIA DEL 12 DE JUNIO DE
1776
"Los
derechos se toman, no se piden; se arrancan, no se mendigan."
José Martí
Los tres nombres que menciono al principio Gandhi, King y Boitel, fueron
hombres que lucharon por estos derechos. ¿Cuál fue el más grande de los tres?
Vamos a analizar la trayectoria y la estrategia de cada uno para ver como
fue su lucha y de esta manera tratar de responder esta pregunta.
Ell nombre de Gandhi y King, aparecen en todos los libros de historia, son
y serán recordados en toda la historia de la humanidad.
Sus nombres y sus personas serán recordados y reconocidos como personas que
lucharon por los derechos del hombre.
Sin embargo el nombre de Pedro Luis Boitel, sólo será recordado por algunos
contemporáneos que fueron testigos de su lucha, su nombre no es ni siquiera
reconocido en su patria por la gran mayoría de sus ciudadanos.
¿Fue la lucha de King y Gandhi mejor que la de Boitel? ¿Fueron ellos como
personas mejores que Boitel? No lo creo, todo lo contrario, creo que
Boitel fue mejor persona y su lucha mayor y más justa que la de Gandhi y King.
¿Por qué entonces la diferencia?
Esto se debe a que los resultados de la lucha, King y Gandhi lograron su
objetivo.
Pero la pregunta es otra vez ¿Por qué?
No me cabe la menor duda que la grandeza no está en los hombres sino en el
sistema.
King y Gandhi deben su grandeza a que desarrollaron su lucha en un sistema
de libertades que permitieron que su lucha fuera más efectiva que la de Boitel.
Así que ¿Que cosa es más importante, los hombres o el sistema de libertades
que permitieron que pudieran lograr los derechos inherentes que
reclamaban? El
El historiador Paul Johnson nos dice “¿Cómo la lucha de Gandhi hubiera podido
florecer si no fuera por el entorno de libertades que proveía el imperio
Británico?”.
Orwell nos dice “Es difícil ver como los métodos de Gandhi
pueden ser aplicados en un país donde los oponentes de los derechos humanos
desaparecen en el medio de la noche y no se oye de ellos más nunca”
Lo mismo podemos decir de King, tanto uno como el otro tomaron ventaja de
la libertad de prensa que le permitieron exponer sus punto de vista a todos en
su país y en el mundo.
Esto es algo que no pudo hacer Pedro Luis Boitel, por eso no hubo un Gandhi
alemán bajo Hitler, por eso no hubo un King ruso bajo Stalin, por eso los que
usan la resistencia pacífica hoy en día en Cuba, son ignorados y desconocidos
en el mundo, porque son reprimidos y su mensaje no llega a su pueblo..
Si Gandhi y King hubieran vivido en un país como la Alemania de Hitler, la
Rusia de Stalin o la Cuba de Fidel Castro, nadie recordaría sus nombres hoy en
día porque como Boitel hubieran fracasado en su empeño.
Por eso es que aunque en lo personal las ideas sociopolíticas de Boitel
eran más puras y racionales que las de Gandhi y King, el mundo no
conoce de Boitel
Gandhi en su pacifismo rígido, criticó la lucha de Inglaterra contra los
Nazis , King hizo lo mismo, experimentó con la doctrina comunista y atacó
a su país por la guerra de Vietnam, atacaron al sistema que les permitió
desarrollar sus ideales, el sistema que les permitió lograr su objetivo..
Creo en la resistencia pacífica como un mal necesario, no como una
estrategia digna, creo como dijo Jose Martí que "Los derechos se toman, no
se piden; se arrancan, no se mendigan."
King y Gandhi fueron capaces de lograr con su estrategia pacifista sus
objetivos porque vivieron en un entorno donde los padres de la patria
obtuvieron esos derechos por guerra necesaria y lograron la libertad
para crear una nación de derechos para todos que hace posible al que siente que
esos derechos le son negados tener la libertad de protestar pacíficamente.
Por los que no mendigaron los derechos, los arrancaron con las armas, los
Gandhi y los King pudieron ser capaces de pedir sus derechos.
Porque otros antes que él no pudieron arrancar de los
tiranos los derechos de su pueblo, Bofil murió en la cárcel sin
haber cumplido su destino.
Los principios de los derechos de toda la humanidad, son más importantes
que los hombres que luchan por los principios de una parte de la
humanidad.
No es que Gandhi y King no tengan méritos, pero el mayor mérito hay que
dárselo al sistema que es lo que expone en la declaración de los derechos de
1779 y que no se pidió ni mendigó, se arrancó con la guerra justa como a la que
Gandhi y King se opusieron, criticaron y negaron.
Esta es la paradoja, si no existen esos derechos arrancados por la fuerza,
no pueden ni nunca pudieran existir ni un Mahatma ni un King que puedan
reclamar sus derechos.
La vida de Pedro Luis Boitel es un testimonio histórico de esa verdad. Pero
en el corazón de los que vivieron la lucha de Pedro Luis, este tiene un sitio
mucho más alto que King y Gandhi
Amenper: William F. Buckley Jr., frases de
sus artículos.
Los liberales dices que quieren dar libertad de
expresión a todos los puntos de vistas....pero se ofenden cuando descubren que
hay otros puntos de vistas.
En los años 30 nos dijeron que teníamos que
colectivizar la nación porque las personas eran muy pobres. Ahora nos dicen
que tenemos que colectivizar la nación porque las personas son muy ricas. William
F. Buckley, Jr.
La verdad es una dama muy modesta, muy fina para darle
a usted un golpe en la cabeza y arrastrarlo a su cueva. Ella está ahí pero
la persona tiene que desearla y buscarla.
Yo recibo satisfacción en mi vida en tres cosas. Una
es crear algo, otra es que me paguen por lo creado, y el otro es la
satisfacción de que no he estado sentado recostado en mi culo toda la tarde.
Yo quisiera electrocutar a cada persona que usa la
palabra "justo" en referencia con los impuestos sobre los ingresos. William F. Buckley, Jr.
Yo creo profundamente que toma mucha practica para
convertirse en un cochino moral..
William F. Buckley, Jr.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Todas las ideas conservadoras ahora son llamadas
reaccionarias.
Los científicos son personas que fabrican el Puente de
Brooklyn y entonces lo compran.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Las Personas decentes no deben de meterse en política,
a no ser que la política se meta con ellos.
Yo encuentro más fácil creer en Dios, que creer que el
intelecto que creó Hamlet, salió de una masa deforme.
Los conservadores deben de ser categóricos sobre la
necesidad la re-aparición de los valores Judeo-Cristianos en el foro público.
Yo me divierto más criticando que halagando
Sin lugar a dudas, formulaciones modernas deben de ser
incluidas en defensa de las verdades tradicionales. No por alegaciones de
anacronismo de las viejas ideas-Sus bienaventuranzas se mantienen como los
elementos esenciales del mundo occidental- pero porque los modismos idiomáticos
en la vida cambian constantemente
Karl Marx fue un genio, un extraordinario manipulador
de la historia del mundo que nos atragantó con lo su pensamiento, los que
convirtió en un juego de Guija, con cuyos movimientos el creó axiomas universales. El tuvo
sus seguidores durante la revolución Industrial. Pero fue desacreditado y descubierto
por la experiencia histórica como en el cuento del Wizard of Oz. Pero hay personas ya
creciditas todavía por ahí, que se declaran Marxistas,
inventando excusas para cosas desde el Gulag hasta Afganistán.
Amenper: Who is Middle Class?
Politicians
tell us that they are for the middle Class.
But
the accepted structure of middle class goes to a person that could have an
income of $140,000.00, this person do not benefit of the welfare state
benefits, they don't need or want the taxes from the rich.
The
question is, who are these the persons that are they referring to,
when they talk about middle class?
Are
they talking about the poor, those that they keep captive from the
dependence of the hands out of the welfare?
If
they are talking about the poor, it is OK, but why don't they say so?
What
is all that talk about helping the middle class?
We
don't hear this in the news, they accept silently the sophistic talk of the
politicians from both sides of the aisle, but mostly from the
left. Because there is a feature of American life that
negates it all: TV news is insidiously slanted to the Left. The three broadcast
TV networks, twist the facts and distort Americans’ perception of the world to
match the views of the smug, clannish liberals who control them.
This
isn't to say that the broadcasting companies have carefully thought out a
scheme of misinformation. It is almost unconscious, a matter of – ‘bias’.
Accordingly
with Wikipedia," Bias is an inclination of temperament or
outlook to present or hold a partial perspective, often accompanied by a
refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view."
It was always
accepted before the media changed the game, that Middle Class was the social
group between the upper and working classes, including professional and
business workers and their families. While the concept is typically
ambiguous in popular opinion and common language this is what middle class
really is.
In Cuba we had a
middle class of workers that were employed in large companies. These
workers while unionized, had an income commonly similar to the professionals
and small business owners.
In U.S.A. the
number of these workers are superior to in Cuba, because of the large number of
big companies in the business world of America.
Accordingly to the
statistics, roughly 20% to 25% of households is the upper or professional
middle class consisting of highly educated, salaried professionals and
managers.
Constituting
roughly one third of households is the lower middle class consisting
mostly of semi-professionals, skilled craftsmen and lower-level
management. Middle-class persons commonly have a comfortable standard of
living, significant economic security, considerable work autonomy and rely on
their expertise to sustain themselves. they do not depend of government hand
outs. When we put the two levels of middle class together 70% of the Americans
are middle class, they pay taxes, the other 30% are either upper lower
class making 40 to 60 thousands dollars a year, or poor underclass workers and
unemployed, they usually don't pay taxes and receive benefits from public
assistance.
Accepted
class structures in the present, places the range for lower middle class at
individuals making between $50,000 and $100,000 a year. When a
person finally arrives to the upper middle class, we have to consider that the
range is from $135,000 to $600,000. that leaves persons making
$150,000.00 of a combined household income will be in the same tax range of a
person with a half of a million dollar income.
Also
the combined income of two professionals or as a small entrepreneur of a
S Business corporation with revenues of over $250,000.00, which
is an income that this administration has established as the
point to tax a person as "rich" is not exactly the kind of
income of $1.5 million that is the accepted level of a wealthy person.
Below
you may see the table of the accepted class
structure. What we see in this administration, is not a concern for
the poor, but an attack to the class that with their responsibility creates the
wealth of the country.
This
is just more of the same socialist doctrine, to destroy the creators of wealth,
to install a new system with a structure of only two classes, the poor people
and the government new class controlling the wealth.
Amenper:
Scott Walker will win
|
(Changes of title are my personal perceptions) Amenper
By DICK MORRIS
Published on TheHill.com on February 3,
2015
Scott Walker is the only ambidextrous
candidate in the Republican field. He appeals equally to the Republican
establishment and the Tea Party/evangelical wingers.
All other candidates fit neatly in one
or the other box. While Jeb Bush's record in Florida used to make him the most attractive
member of his family to conservatives, he has blown that accolade with his
strong support for immigration amnesty and Common Core.
Chris Christie was never the darling of
conservatives, but his appeal to establishment Republicans is obvious.
Neither Bush nor Christie is a
switch-hitter.
On the right, Ted Cruz's views fit the
Tea Party like a glove but his brand of fiery politics may be too much for
establishment ears. He is so effective and so on target that he scares the
cautious GOP establishment to death. Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum have
perfect pitch in appealing to evangelicals, but, perforce, are too out there
for the more establishment types.
Rand Paul and Marco Rubio both have the
potential to be transcendent, Paul because he is blazing new ideological
grounds and Rubio because of his cautious, respectful tone.
But both are very young and the
establishment doesn't want to take chances. Can Rubio hold his own on a
national stage (without frequent gulps of water)? Can Paul's libertarian ideology
catch on? The establishment would rather not find out with the presidency on
the line.
Paul also runs afoul of the national
security wing of the establishment, a potent part of the centrist coalition.
Rick Perry once spanned the centrist
and Tea Party wings of the party -- until he imploded in 2012. Can he recover
from his ungraceful exit last time? Can he overcome the phony indictment under
which partisan Texas prosecutors have forced him to labor? We don't know yet.
Cruz, Paul, Rubio, Huckabee, Santorum
and Perry are all are hoping to be crossovers, keeping their Tea Party base but
appealing to the center as well. But Walker is effortlessly able to battle for
the establishment, the Tea Party and the evangelical vote. And there is no
reason for him to have trouble with national security voters, either.
The Wisconsin governor has been elected
and reelected, and defeated a recall attempt in a key swing state. His combat
credentials are enough to assuage worries the establishment might have about a
first-time candidate. His record on job creation and fiscal discipline is
admirable. He is the Christie who succeeded; Wisconsin is where the New Jersey
governor dreamed his state would be.
Yet Walker's credentials as a battler
against the left earn him backing from the right wing of the Republican Party,
including his stand against municipal unions, amnesty and Common Core.
From the Republican point of view, he
is America's most successful governor. He offers a chance to take the education
issue away from Hillary Clinton. He has actually turned a school system around,
ironically, by applying some of the very same remedies Clinton first proposed
in Arkansas in 1982 but has long since abandoned in her sycophancy toward the
National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers.
And Walker has been vetted. He has been
through a trial by fire that no other GOP presidential aspirant has. Under the
constant pressure of the municipal labor unions, continuously tested in recalls
(both his own and his senators'), he has survived nicely.
Energetic, young, charismatic and
fresh, Walker provides just the kind of generational contrast Clinton has most
to fear. And, now with Mitt Romney out of the race, he can spread his wings.
Mason-Dixon Poll: Fla. Voters Want Rubio
in Senate, Not WH
Monday, 02 Feb 2015 07:10 PM
By Jason Devaney
Florida voters think their Republican Sen.
Marco Rubio should stay in the Senate and not run for president, according to
the results of a new poll.
The Mason-Dixon poll found that just 15 percent of Florida voters think Rubio should launch a 2016 White House run, compared to the 57 percent that think he should run for reelection in the Senate next year.
The Mason-Dixon poll found that just 15 percent of Florida voters think Rubio should launch a 2016 White House run, compared to the 57 percent that think he should run for reelection in the Senate next year.
In terms of political parties, 19 percent
of Republicans and 15 percent of Democrats think Rubio should run for
president. Sixty-eight percent of Republicans and 47 percent of Democrats feel
he should pursue another term in the Senate.
Independent voters turned in similar results, with just 16 percent saying Rubio should run for president and 56 percent thinking he should shoot for the Senate again in 2016.
The poll also asked voters if former Gov. Jeb Bush should run for the White House next year, to which 42 percent said he should. Forty-three percent think he should not.
Republicans were the largest supporting group of Bush's potential presidential plans, with 59 percent saying he should run. Fifty percent of Independents and 23 percent of Democrats thought the same.
Independent voters turned in similar results, with just 16 percent saying Rubio should run for president and 56 percent thinking he should shoot for the Senate again in 2016.
The poll also asked voters if former Gov. Jeb Bush should run for the White House next year, to which 42 percent said he should. Forty-three percent think he should not.
Republicans were the largest supporting group of Bush's potential presidential plans, with 59 percent saying he should run. Fifty percent of Independents and 23 percent of Democrats thought the same.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Politics/marco-rubio-florida-voters-poll/2015/02/02/id/622247/#ixzz3Qk1QSrEG
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Jorge
Alberto Villalón Y.
3044 S.W. 27 Ave
Dershowitz: On Iran, Obama Is Another Neville Chamberlain
Iran has made no secret of its desire to
decimate Israel, yet the Obama administration continues to negotiate a
"bad, bad deal" with Tehran that will allow the country to have the
capability to act on its desires, according to Harvard law professor Alan
Dershowitz and former New York Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik, both of whom
appeared Monday on Newsmax TV's "America's
Forum."
"If you go back in history Hitler was not as forthright … as Iran is today in what they intend to do," said Kerik, who in 2003 was appointed by President George W. Bush to reconstruct the Iraqi interior ministry. "They want to blow Israel off the map, they want the demise of the Israeli people."
"If you go back in history Hitler was not as forthright … as Iran is today in what they intend to do," said Kerik, who in 2003 was appointed by President George W. Bush to reconstruct the Iraqi interior ministry. "They want to blow Israel off the map, they want the demise of the Israeli people."
Iran is "funding Hamas and Hezbollah
and these other major terrorist organizations," Kerik said. "There is
no negotiating with a bully. You don't put that bully on the world stage
especially in this position, and that's what we've done, that's what we
continue to do.
"The threat is increasing, has increased substantially since 2006-2007 when I was writing about this years ago, and it's only getting worse and if we don't stop it now … in the years to come it's going to be far, far worse."
In January, The Jerusalem Post reported that Iran had deployed a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which not only can reach Israel, but also Europe.
The missile and its launch pad are "a direct threat to the United States as well," according to a 2013 U.S. intelligence report that stated that Iran could test an ICBM this year, according to the Post.
The Obama administration's "negotiations" are a joke, according to Dershowitz, who noted that even if Iran accepts the proposed deal — which some reports have said give Tehran 80 percent of what it wants — there's nothing to prevent them from developing "trigger mechanisms."
"All it stops them from doing, or it requires them to go underground to do it, is their centrifuges, and it allows them to remain a threshold nuclear power and it has a sunset prevision," Dershowitz said. "After a few years, the number has not been explicitly stated, they can go on and do whatever they please.
"The threat is increasing, has increased substantially since 2006-2007 when I was writing about this years ago, and it's only getting worse and if we don't stop it now … in the years to come it's going to be far, far worse."
In January, The Jerusalem Post reported that Iran had deployed a new intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which not only can reach Israel, but also Europe.
The missile and its launch pad are "a direct threat to the United States as well," according to a 2013 U.S. intelligence report that stated that Iran could test an ICBM this year, according to the Post.
The Obama administration's "negotiations" are a joke, according to Dershowitz, who noted that even if Iran accepts the proposed deal — which some reports have said give Tehran 80 percent of what it wants — there's nothing to prevent them from developing "trigger mechanisms."
"All it stops them from doing, or it requires them to go underground to do it, is their centrifuges, and it allows them to remain a threshold nuclear power and it has a sunset prevision," Dershowitz said. "After a few years, the number has not been explicitly stated, they can go on and do whatever they please.
"This is a very bad deal, a bad deal
for the United States, a bad deal for the international community."
Furthermore, Dershowitz said, the deal does not address Iran being the major exporter of terrorism.
"My fear is that whether it's this year or next year or 10 years from now, Barack Obama is going to go down in history as the (former British Prime Minister) Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, if Iran ever does develop nuclear weapons.
"We will point to this point in history and say, this was the turning point. This was the point where the president could've recognized the greatest threat to the world in the 21st century and, like Chamberlain in the 20th century, he failed to do it. That will be his legacy if Iran develops nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver them."
The men also addressed future terror attacks and whether Islamic militants are planning another "spectacular" event like 9/11.
"I strongly believe that you don't need that today, you don't need four planes flying into buildings," Kerik said. "If you had an attack like you had in Paris here, not one, but if you had four attacks like you had in Paris in different cities at the same time on the same day — in a school, in a hospital, in a tourist location — I can assure you that's going to be a spectacular event.
"It's going to create major fear and things like that, which is what these guys try to instill," he said.
"Is that possible? Yes it's possible and our intelligence capabilities, our intelligence ability, is what we have to depend on right now to make sure that that stuff doesn't happen."
American trains are particularly vulnerable, said Dershowitz, author of "Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel's Just War Against Hamas."
"When you go to Grand Central Station or Penn Station in rush hour, there are thousands of people and there's very, very little security," he said.
The airlines are far more secure today than pre-9/11, according to Kerik, but there's always the possibility of someone slipping through the cracks.
"Especially in some of these airports that don't have the physical security, perimeter security that they should have," he said. "We have to look at everything and most importantly it's got to be preemptive and proactive.
Furthermore, Dershowitz said, the deal does not address Iran being the major exporter of terrorism.
"My fear is that whether it's this year or next year or 10 years from now, Barack Obama is going to go down in history as the (former British Prime Minister) Neville Chamberlain of the 21st century, if Iran ever does develop nuclear weapons.
"We will point to this point in history and say, this was the turning point. This was the point where the president could've recognized the greatest threat to the world in the 21st century and, like Chamberlain in the 20th century, he failed to do it. That will be his legacy if Iran develops nuclear weapons and the capacity to deliver them."
The men also addressed future terror attacks and whether Islamic militants are planning another "spectacular" event like 9/11.
"I strongly believe that you don't need that today, you don't need four planes flying into buildings," Kerik said. "If you had an attack like you had in Paris here, not one, but if you had four attacks like you had in Paris in different cities at the same time on the same day — in a school, in a hospital, in a tourist location — I can assure you that's going to be a spectacular event.
"It's going to create major fear and things like that, which is what these guys try to instill," he said.
"Is that possible? Yes it's possible and our intelligence capabilities, our intelligence ability, is what we have to depend on right now to make sure that that stuff doesn't happen."
American trains are particularly vulnerable, said Dershowitz, author of "Terror Tunnels: The Case for Israel's Just War Against Hamas."
"When you go to Grand Central Station or Penn Station in rush hour, there are thousands of people and there's very, very little security," he said.
The airlines are far more secure today than pre-9/11, according to Kerik, but there's always the possibility of someone slipping through the cracks.
"Especially in some of these airports that don't have the physical security, perimeter security that they should have," he said. "We have to look at everything and most importantly it's got to be preemptive and proactive.
"We are a reactive country
historically, and that creates a major problem for us. It's not doing us any
good after the fact."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Bernie-Kerik-Alan-Dershowitz-iran-nuclear-weapons/2015/02/02/id/622114/#ixzz3QmoaIQlk
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Bernie-Kerik-Alan-Dershowitz-iran-nuclear-weapons/2015/02/02/id/622114/#ixzz3QmoaIQlk
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Every
Al Sharpton Business Has Been Shut Down In At Least One Jurisdiction
Are
Sharpton's crimes catching up with him?
A review of public records in New York and
Delaware has revealed that every business started by Al Sharpton has been shut down in
at least one jurisdiction for failure to pay taxes.
According to National Review Online, the
records of Sharpton’s organizations are “copious, confusing, and sometimes
outright bizarre; and together, they depict persistent financial woes for
Sharpton, who also personally owes New York State nearly $596,000, according to
active tax warrants.”
Bernadette Schopfer, the director of taxation
at New York’s Maier Markey & Justic, a certified public-accounting firm
that has had no dealings with Sharpton, stated:
Advertisement-content continues below
He clearly appears — based on the information
that’s available to us — to have a history of noncompliance with tax
obligations. It appears that [Sharpton] does not file [taxes for his
businesses], and then opens up something else. At all the entities we see he
has opened up, he has not been compliant with the obligations of the owner of a
business. . . . He’s either willful in his behavior, or
he’s just sloppy.
Sharpton’s first company, Raw Talent, picked up
a lot of tax debt and finally dissolved in 2002 for failure to pay taxes.
Revel Communications, his second company,
started in 1999. It either failed to file or pay taxes from 1999 to 2002.
Advertisement-content continues below
He also started another for-profit entity,
Sharpton Media Group. A spokeswoman for National Action Network, Sharpton’s
non-profit organization, stated that Sharpton Media Group ceased to operate
after a tax settlement.
Bo Spanky is another company he founded, one
that dissolved due to a failure to pay a tax debt.
Carl Redding thinks that Sharpton’s problems
may be catching up with him.
Redding also stated:
What he’s doing is negligent. Absolute
power corrupts absolutely. I believe that Sharpton has become so powerful
it’s diluting everything about him. The African-American community doesn’t
trust Sharpton anymore. He’s living in a fantasy world if he thinks he has
credibility.
Schopfer, the tax expert, said:
They have a lien, and that’s as far as they
(New York State and IRS) can really pursue it unless there’s money that they
can claim under the lien. It’s probably on their [radar], and they’ve taken it
as far as they can until there’s an asset they can claim.
Should the authorities do more to hold Sharpton
accountable for his negligence in paying taxes? Feel free to share your
thoughts.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/every-al-sharpton-business-shut-least-one-jurisdiction/#tPFP2eFbs6z9rEUJ.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/every-al-sharpton-business-shut-least-one-jurisdiction/#tPFP2eFbs6z9rEUJ.99
WATCH:
Ferguson Protesters Claim Obama, Holder Support Their Pro-Palestine,
Anti-Israel Campaign
A CNN and MSNBC contributor is among the
Ferguson protestors working with Obama against Israel.
They
call themselves “freedom fighters,” this group of top Ferguson activists joined
together under the #BlackLivesMatter banner that has become a prominent, as
well as highly controversial, protest slogan.
And now
— proudly proclaiming they have the firm support of Barack Obama, Eric Holder, and
Al Sharpton — a number of the self-described leaders of the movement have
traveled to Nazareth, known as the Arab capital of Israel, to rally in
solidarity with Palestinians in their fight against the Israelis.
Details
of the #BlackLivesMatter demonstration are available on the Hands
Up United website, where 2015 is declared a “year of
resistance” against police brutality and societal oppression that supposedly
keeps minorities in America “in chains.”
Advertisement-content
continues below
“2015: The Year of Resistance with a firm
dedication to the liberation of Black, Brown and oppressed communities, along
with dismantling the New Jim Crow, we would like to honor our sisters and
brothers who paved the way in our nation and around the world!”
According
to the Ferguson protest leaders who went to Israel to “rail” against that
country’s policies, among the “oppressed communities” of the world are the
Palestinians in Gaza, who they compared to black residents of racially
torn Ferguson, Missouri.
And in
proclaiming their commitment to agitate on behalf of the Palestinians, the
#BlackLivesMatter protesters boast that they have powerful and prominent
people on their side, including the President of the United States.
Advertisement-content
continues below
From the statement on their website: “The
Ferguson and Eric Garner protests, staunchly supported by President Obama,
Attorney General Eric Holder and informal adviser Al Sharpton, have
well-documented strains of anti-Israel sentiment running through them.”
By
clicking on the video above, you can watch an account of the trip to Israel
produced and published by the Ferguson protest group, which included university
professor and racial activist Marc Lamont Hill, often seen as a commentator on
CNN and MSNBC.
It’s
interesting to note that this Ferguson protest group has been agitating in
Israel as relations between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and
President Obama have been publicly deteriorating.
Western
Journalism has also
reported on the apparent attempt by Obama campaign cronies, as well as John
Kerry’s State Department, to actively influence the outcome of the upcoming
Israeli elections — reportedly working on the ground, in Israel, against the
re-election of Netanyahu.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-ferguson-protestors-claim-obama-holder-support-pro-palestine-anti-israel-campaign/#CVuIgq2wQhGkRoQB.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-ferguson-protestors-claim-obama-holder-support-pro-palestine-anti-israel-campaign/#CVuIgq2wQhGkRoQB.99
Shocking New Snowden Leaks That Could Change the
World
(Disclose.tv) January 29, 2015 – Here are just some of
the notes from the interview. This one contained so much explosive information that you’re sure to learn a lot that you don’t
know. If you’re a patriot that is sick of the criminals getting away with
everything then do something! SHARE this to your facebook walls, email lists,
twitter so that their crimes will be exposed. It’s not enough that you learn
this information. You MUST share it with as many others as posssible to create
the chagne you want to see in the world!
In the latest Veterans Today Radio broadcast on
10-6-14, Gordon Duff goes over some of the hardcore information that he got
from Edward Snowden. Gordon talks about how the US media has covered up all of
this new Snowden information and only put out some “chicken feed”
about the US spying on Germany. In fact, CNN was given the huge Snowden release
on 9/11 being nuclear event first and suppressed the story. Veterans Today was
the 3rd media outlet to get the information and was the only one to release it!
Snowden literally brought the keys to the kingdom when he went to Russia and we
have not heard all of it. Gordon covers some more of this information in this
broadcast but you should also listen to the 6-4-14 episode of Veterans Today
Radio for much more on 9/11. This information literally rocked the world and
has been copied and heard by millions now. Unfortunately, this information has
been suppressed by all mainstream media and most of the alternative media
including the “tip of the spear” types.
Here are some brief notes of just some of this
interview. I had to get this article out now so didn’t have time to include all
of it. I hope all of you are spreading these interviews into all aspects of the
alternative media because it’s being censored by many of the fakes that won’t
touch it! Expose the fakes!
Gordon also talked about some of these topics.
Biden recently mentioned Turkey as helping ISIS
because of the information from Gordon Duff.
US lied when they said two planes recently lost to a
typhoon. One of those planes an F-16 is lying in pieces in Syria after being
shot down by an American PAC2 missile! The same missile used in Israeli Iron
Dome system. US has now ceased all air operations because of a plot by traitors
within the US Military, Air Force a retired General affiliated with Fox News
and some affiliated with Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News. This plot was to allow a
plane to be shot down and captured by ISIS so they could “Jimmy Carter” Obama
and help Republicans win the upcoming elections. Daish (ISIS) wants one or more
American pilots before the elections that they can threaten to behead. The
other aircraft lost was an Marine Osprey flying a team into Iraq. Gordon has
been told that the crew of these airplanes were recovered.
Now that ISIS has our one of our most advanced missile
systems we can’t offer air support to the Kurds and they are threatned to have
100,000 of them slaughtered now. During the Vietnam war, John McCain gave the
North Vietnamese the information that allowed them to shoot down more American
planes!
Gordon talks about the Presidio which is the home to
psychological warfare command. This base in San Francisco was run by two men.
One of them was a Colonel and the other a major. Both were “cutting edge” (men
who stare at goat types). One of them was involved with “the temple of Set” and
the “Church of Satan”. (note you can easily find this man’s name by googling
both of those organizations). The other man is a retired General that works for
Fox News. You can find out who is by searching google for “senior military
analyst fox news retired general”.
One of these men that run the “Temple of Set” in 1980
was accused of the sexual molestation of 150 children by the San Francisco
Examiner who were brutally raped at “The Presidio” and other military bases! In
1986 this man had a search warrant issued on his home and it was said that 38
films were seized depicting violent sexual acts against children as young as 9.
All of this evidence was covered up and no charges were brought. This man now
helps run the NSA!
All of the “heroes” from the Bush Administration were
treasonous. You’ll never know the heroes.
One of Snowden’s biggest Intel drops was only put out
by VeteransToday and it was the 2003 Dept of Energy report that showed 9/11 was
a nuclear event! Nobody in mainstream put it out even though some such as CNN
was given it before VeteransToday.
“En mi
opinión”
No 859 Febrero 4, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment