No 801 “En mi
opinión” Noviembre 22, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Oklahoma
And Texas Attorneys General Promise To Hold Obama Accountable For Executive
Action
"The
executive action that the President proposed tonight is ill-advised,
unworkable, unlawful, and brazenly political. The administration will be
held accountable.”
The
attorneys general of Oklahoma and Texas said on Thursday they plan to
challenge President Obama’s executive action on immigration.
In a prime-time address to the nation
Thursday, Obama announced he would take executive action which
would allow about five
million illegal
immigrants to register for background checks, pay back taxes, work, and receive
Social Security cards.
Texas
Governor-elect Greg Abbott, who is still state Attorney General until he takes
his oath in January, said in a press
release Thursday,
“President
Obama has circumvented Congress and deliberately bypassed the will of the
American people, eroding the very foundation of our nation’s Constitution and
bestowing a legacy of lawlessness. Texans have witnessed firsthand the costs
and consequences caused by President Obama’s dictatorial immigration policy and
now we must work together toward a solution in fixing our broken immigration
system. Following tonight’s pronouncement, I am prepared to immediately
challenge President Obama in court, securing our state’s sovereignty and
guaranteeing the rule of law as it is intended under the Constitution.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/texas-governor-elect-greg-abbott-oklahoma-attorney-general-challenge-obama-immigration-executive-action/#GvyXHRO31lslYRlO.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/texas-governor-elect-greg-abbott-oklahoma-attorney-general-challenge-obama-immigration-executive-action/#GvyXHRO31lslYRlO.99
Amenper: La Historia no
los Absolverá
Estaba leyendo
un artículo de Peggy Noolan en lo que ella llama elementos de Nihilismo en la
Casa Blanca, aunque realmente, no creo que Nihilismo sea lo que describe la
conducta de la Casa Blanca.
Nihilista es la
persona que no se inclina ante ninguna autoridad, que no acepta ningún
principio como artículo de fe, y aunque esto es parte de la conducta del
presidente, esto no es propiamente la descripción del gobernante en la Casa
Blanca ni de ninguno de los gobernantes que una vez embriagados con el poder se
convierten en dictadores egocéntricos y narcisistas.
La palabra más
adecuado sería la egolatría, porque esto define culto, adoración,
amor excesivo de sí mismo. Y esto es lo que vemos en estos dictadores, ya haya
sido Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Fidel Castro, Chávez o el actual
inquilino de la Casa Blanca.
La egolatría de
estos líderes toman carácter sagrado para lo que los siguen, los líderes toman
atributos de omnisapiencia y omnipotencia y sus cercanos seguidores atributos
sacerdotales.
Hay un elemento
extraño, un pensamiento mágico en la psicología común en estas personas
que es el asumir que la historia va a declarar su grandeza en el camino. Se
procede como si esta grandeza fuera automática, garantizada: algún día, la
historia futura será reflexionar sobre sus logros y anunciar su genio.
La asunción de
reivindicación inevitable de la historia es más aguda en la actual Casa Blanca,
debido a la presunción general — realmente creen poseen una sabiduría superior
y un juego más profundo — y la expectativa e ilusión de que los historiadores
liberales al final van a escribir la historia, y “la historia los
absolverá”. ¿Les resulta familiar?
La ilusión se
convierte en una forma de licencia.
Ellos se dicen,
no tenemos que escuchar a los críticos, adversarios, sólo tenemos que forzar a
través de nuestra visión superior nuestra agenda de gobierno y dejar que la
historia dicte en el camino que lo hemos hecho tan bien.
Y
piensan, la reivindicación histórica tan espectacular que sucedió en el
caso de Ronald Reagan, así sucederá en nuestro caso
Lo que no se
acuerdan ellos es que Reagan, hizo todo lo contrario a lo que ellos hacen.
Por hacerlo fue
criticado por ellos que se burlaron de él cuando era presidente, riéndose de su
actuación en la presidencia, llamándolo cowboy por su antecedentes de actor,
por su política exterior ante el comunismo, y llamando Reaganomics a su gestión
económica.
Contrario a
ellos demostró su habilidad para trabajar con un congreso hostil y su gestión
de gobierno lo reivindicó ante sus contemporáneos y ante la historia.
Reivindicación
histórica ocurre. Le ocurrió a Reagan, la casa blanca de Obama asume que les
pasará también a ellos.
Por lo tanto
pueden hacer prácticamente lo que ellos quieren.
Lo que olvidan
o de lo que no se dan cuenta es que son los hechos los que deciden al final lo
qué historia piensa — los resultados, lo que pasó y lo que significa.
Lo que olvidan
también, o quizás nunca lo han sabido, es que los grandes como Reagan siempre
son constructivos. No dividen y destruyen. Construyen, se interesan
en crear, doblar, se funden en sus ideas y al hacerlo mueven las cosas hacia
delante.
Por eso cuando
se habla de los presidentes más admirados por los ciudadanos, Ronald Reagan
está ahí arriba con Lincoln.
Esta casa
blanca parece impulsada — por una especie de egolatría política. Divide,
agrava, confronta y separa, todo lo contrario a lo que hacen los verdaderamente
buenos gobernantes, contrario a los que hizo Ronald Reagan.
Mira a tres
grandes problemas nacionales sólo las últimas semanas. Obamacare, cuya
legitimidad estaba medio muerto por la mentira de que "Si te gusta tu
plan, puedes quedártelo" y luego por la incompetencia de su aplicación, y
se ha hecho en ahora peor, por el sin sentido, presumiendo arbitrariamente en
las declaraciones de un tecnócrata que lo ayudó a construir, explicando
que la aprobación de la ley fue asegurada solamente por mentiras, y las
mentiras fueron efectivas porque los estadounidenses son estúpidos.
Construyeron
una cosa tan impenetrable, tan deliberadamente imposible para cualquier persona
normal para entender, y entonces les denigran diciéndonos estúpidos por no
entender.
No sé cómo irá
Obamacare, pero no va a durar mucho como es.
La acción
ejecutiva del Presidente sobre la inmigración es otro acto de un ególatra
voluntarioso que él mismo había discutido como inapropiado en el pasado, es un
cuchillo afilado en el ojo de la nueva mayoría del Congreso.
Está en
desacuerdo con — desafía — el significado y el mensaje de las últimas
elecciones y por lo tanto, es destructivo para la reputación de la propia
democracia.
No es de mucho
impacto, son unas medidas suaves que no afecta realmente al escenario completo
de la inmigración, pero tiene sólo una única causa, voluntad solitaria del
Presidente.
Daña el
prestigio de nuestras instituciones políticas, en lugar de reforzarlas, que es
lo que desesperadamente necesitan y establece una plantilla para el abuso
futuro del poder ejecutivo.
Alentará
seguramente mayor inmigración ilegal y así erosionará aún más la posición de la
clase obrera estadounidense
Y ahí está el
oleoducto Keystone XL el senado aún demócrata no lo aprobó por un
solo voto, pero ya Obama había prometido vetar la ley.
La cuestión es
que la ley no sólo crearía la canalización de los puestos de trabajo y no sólo
el elemento de infraestructura. Es algo más. Si se hace bien, la gente que
construye el gasoducto podría ser presionada para tomar a los jóvenes de menos
habilidad, sin rumbo y aprendizaje, como parte de un equipo de trabajadores de
construcción.
Pero este
parece ser el espíritu de la casa blanca, diferente a las grandes presidencias
que tienen una conducta diferente, ampliar, avanzar, llegar.
El futuro
reconocimiento de la grandeza sólo sigue a una real grandeza.
La historia
toma la visión a largo plazo pero al final se basa en hechos.
Y el Presidente
ha fracasado no sólo a la nación en general, pero a los liberales en particular
a través de impopularidad, que es sinónimo de incompetencia.
Me parece estar
oyendo a alguno de ustedes decirme "Pero la historia se escribirá por
liberales".
Seguro que sí,
pero creo que ellos juzgarán al presidente más duramente porque él no pudo
hacer nada de lo que debía de haber hecho, ha fracasado en todo, y a nadie le
gusta tratar de esconder los fracasos de otros de su propia filosofía. ¿Han
visto a un liberal tratando de defender a Stalin?
Tratarán de
culpar al individuo no a la filosofía, esto es lo que han hecho los escritores
comunistas con Stalin y Gorbachov y lo harán con Fidel Castro y Hugo Chávez, y
lo harán con Obama.
Su
administración ha fracasado y su fracaso se hará más evidente con el tiempo, y
a nadie le gusta identificarse o disculpar el fracaso.
Obamacare
será corregido y derribado pieza por pieza. La orden de inmigración será
cambiada, disminuida o deshecha por los tribunales, Keystone eventualmente
pasará por el Congreso o a través de acciones ejecutivas en el camino, y la
historia no lo absolverá.
Sheriff
Joe Arpaio Fires Back Against Obama’s Executive Order.
"...let's
not con the American people."
Arizona lawman Joe Arpaio is no stranger to
taking on the Obama administration. The man often referred to as “America’s
Toughest Sheriff” has long held that Barack Obama is not qualified to hold the
office of the presidency, disputing the authenticity of his birth certificate.
As a border state official, Arpaio has also taken exception to Obama’s lax
enforcement of the nation’s immigration laws.
In response to Obama’s announcement Thursday
of executive action that will defer the deportation of more than five million
illegal immigrants, the Maricopa County sheriff is once again setting his
sights on the president.
Reports indicate Arpaio is filing a lawsuit
intended to challenge Obama’s authority to enact such policy unilaterally. He
explained the motivation behind the pursuit in an interview with KNXV.
“We have to understand whether this is constitutional
or not, whether he is going around Congress is legal,” he said. “I’m going to
send a message that we’re not going to give up, that this does affect the
streets of Maricopa County.”
Arpaio did offer a modicum of consideration
regarding Obama’s position; however, he lamented the fact that the nation’s
chief executive chose to dismiss the shortcomings of his plan.
“He speaks a good game,” Arpaio conceded,
“and I understand where he’s coming from in a way. On the other hand, let’s not
con the American public. How are we going to keep track of these five million
people?”
He continued by insisting this first step
toward amnesty will only serve to invite even more illegals into the country.
“This is going to open the door,” he
asserted. “Everybody in Mexico, Central America, thinks they will have a free
pass when they come into our country because of what the president is issuing.”
Read more at
http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-takes-obama-court-executive-order/#mOQDpvbYyKydwEsK.99
A HEARTFELT & ACCURATE E-MAIL WRITTEN
ABOUT
THE MAKING OF A DICTATOR IN THE UNITED SATES,
BY ANOTHER BOLD, CUBAN-BORN, CATHOLIC
REPUBLICAN ACTIVIST FROM MIAMI,
MIREYA GEILIN.
Dear "Bold"
Friends of the Faith:
Please take a look at this very accurate assessment
of what Emperor Obama has done to our
beloved United States of America in his 6 tumultuous years that he
has been "over-powering" our country. Being a Cuban-born American
citizen myself, who loves our country and our Church with all my being, I don't
think I could have written this e-mail any better. Mireya Geilin covers it all,
is not afraid to tell it like it is - as her mission is very similar to
mine:
** WAKE UP AMERICA TO THE INJUSTICES THAT WE HAVE HAD TO ENDURE WITH A
DICTATOR WANNA-BE, BARACK OBAMA - AS WE NEED TO STEP UP NOW, AS
ONE
NATION UNDER GOD - AND PUT HIS ILLEGAL EXECUTIVE ACTIONS TO A
COMPLETE STOP!!
REVUELTOS, BRUTALES Y
DESPRECIATIVOS
Por Hugo J. Byrne
José Martí nos previno del “Norte revuelto y brutal que nos
desprecia”. Por supuesto que no se refería a todos los del
norte, sino a los equivalentes
decimonónicos de quienes hoy llamamos “liberales”. ¿Por qué razón escribo
“liberales” entre comillas? Porque estos socialistas furtivos en control de la
mayor parte de los medios de comunicación, plagian todo cuanto les sea útil y
esté a su alcance, incluyendo las más atractivas etiquetas filosóficas.
¿Qué es liberalismo sin
comillas? El Diccionario de la Real Academia Española de la Lengua (Espasa
Calpe, 2006) lo define con precisión así: 1. “Doctrina política que defiende las libertades y la iniciativa individual y limita la
intervención del Estado y de los poderes públicos en la vida social, económica
y cultural”. ¿No es esto la antítesis del socialismo o es que ya no
sabemos leer?
¿Cuándo fue que los partidarios del Estado omnipotente empezaron a llamarse
“liberales” en los Estados Unidos? No tengo la respuesta exacta, pero apuesto a
que Martí, quien con deducción profética llamara al socialismo “la esclavitud futura”, ya había
pasado a la historia.
La exquisita brutalidad, la revoltura y el desprecio de los “liberales” de
Norteamérica no se dirige sólo a los cubanos libres ni a todos aquellos
ciudadanos de habla hispana que no encajen en el estereotipo que han diseñado
para ellos. Desprecian y se
revuelven brutalmente contra todo aquel que discrepe de su agenda y eso incluye
a los votantes. El ejemplo más reciente de ello lo brinda un
economista y profesor del Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts, Jonathan
Gruber PHD.
Gruber fue uno de los arquitectos del notorio Obamacare. Tanto el
Presidente Obama, como su testaferro del Senado, Harry Reid se han referido a
él, por su nombre, con admiración y agradecimiento en un pasado no lejano,
cuando todos cantaban a coro las loas del maravilloso futuro de salud que
aguardaba al pueblo de Estados Unidos gracias al “económicamente accesible”
plan.
Ahora, cuando resulta que las primas suben, que el deducible a los
beneficios sube y que los médicos van a escasear, Gruber anuncia en una serie
de videos que todo eso era bien conocido por la administración. Que
ésta basó su campaña mendaz en la estupidez de los votantes.
Agrega que todos sabían que Obamacare era un impuesto morrocotudo, cuyo
propósito nada tenía que ver con la salud popular sino con la redistribución
(arbitraria) de la riqueza ¿Quién sino un estúpido puede creer en obtener un
beneficio substancial de cualquier naturaleza sin que alguien pague?
Por supuesto, el Presidente Obama ha dicho que estaba en desacuerdo con la opinión de
Gruber. Nótese que no está desmintiendo (por si acaso) la
substancia de lo dicho por el profesor de ITM. Por su parte el Senador Harry
Reid (que yo sepa) no ha dicho esta boca es mía.
Ese tipo de “liberal” como Jonathan Gruber sólo crece en el ámbito
doméstico. En otras tierras suelen adoptar otros nombres un poco más cercanos a
la verdad. Viene a la mente otro deshonesto cínico parecido a Gruber, un
comunista millonario: Pablo Picasso.
Picasso, notorio por las palizas que propinaba a sus mujeres, afirmó en
público una vez que quienes pagaban millones por sus garabatos eran unos cretinos
sin redención intelectual posible. Hasta donde sé, Pablo Picasso murió sin haber rectificado ese aserto y no
creo que sus obras hayan depreciado.
Me pregunto cómo deben sentirse hoy los votantes quienes en noviembre del
2012 tenían todavía fe en la honestidad y buena voluntad de Obama y su
comparsa.
Juan Molerio: Indocumentados: "un tira y encoje"
La explicación
que le puedo encontrar a los Zigzags de Obama con respecto a los indocumentados
es la siguiente, después de prometerles durante su campaña, que haría una
reforma migratoria en el primer año de su presidencia si es elegido:
Ganó la
presidencia con mayoría Demócrata en la Cámara y el Senado en sus dos primeros
años. ¿Cumplió su promesa? ¡no! ¿Por qué? porque necesitaba deportar una
cantidad considerable de indocumentados trabajando por la izquierda, que al
deportarlos otros que estaban contabilizados en el unemployment ocuparían sus
puestos, y el índice de desempleo bajaría.
En el 2010,
perdieron la mayoría en la Cámara y siguieron con mayoría en el Senado, pero el
desempleo aún estaba alto y necesitaba seguir deportando.
Las propuestas
hechas por el Senado, no lo aceptaba la Cámara; y las propuestas de la Cámara,
no las aceptaba el Senado. En ese "tira y encoje", los perjudicados
son los indocumentados, y los ganadores los demócratas por el argumento de que
los culpables son los republicanos.
Al perder los
demócratas el Senado y la Cámara en las elecciones del 2014, ahora están
preocupados que los republicanos resuelvan, lo que Obama no pudo en seis años.
Obama y su
partido, al darse cuenta de lo que puede suceder, y que es posible que pierdan
el voto latino, lo quiere resolver por medio de una orden ejecutiva.
Juan A. Molerio
Miami
Jeh Johnson: Not All Criminals Are Subject to Deportation
Lower-tier criminals such as drunken
drivers and drug dealers aren't on the priority list of people to deport,
according to a memo from
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, who outlined guidelines
for the nation's immigration officers working to administer President Barack
Obama's new executive order for amnesty.
"In general, our enforcement and removal policies should continue to prioritize threats to national security, public safety, and border security," Johnson said in the memo, dated Thursday. "Due to limited resources, DHS and its components cannot respond to all immigration violations or remove all persons illegally in the United States."
"In general, our enforcement and removal policies should continue to prioritize threats to national security, public safety, and border security," Johnson said in the memo, dated Thursday. "Due to limited resources, DHS and its components cannot respond to all immigration violations or remove all persons illegally in the United States."
Immigration authorities are to seek and
deport terror suspects and felons, reports The Washington Examiner. But
lower-level criminals are considered secondary priorities, meaning an illegal
immigrant can be in prison for up to a year for a violent crime but still not
be considered a primary removal priority.
Overall, Johnson's memo says, there are three priorities for people who are to be detained. The first priority, or people to be sent out of country first, are "aliens engaged in or suspected of terrorism or espionage, or who otherwise pose a danger to national security," says the memo.
Others include people trying to "unlawfully enter" the country. In addition, immigrants convicted of felonies, if the immigrant status is "not an essential element" of the offence, and those convicted of an aggravated felony are to be prioritized for deportation.
Overall, Johnson's memo says, there are three priorities for people who are to be detained. The first priority, or people to be sent out of country first, are "aliens engaged in or suspected of terrorism or espionage, or who otherwise pose a danger to national security," says the memo.
Others include people trying to "unlawfully enter" the country. In addition, immigrants convicted of felonies, if the immigrant status is "not an essential element" of the offence, and those convicted of an aggravated felony are to be prioritized for deportation.
The Priority One status immigrants could
have their deportations delayed, though, if they don't qualify for asylum or
there are factors showing they are not a threat.
Priority Two offenders, or the second in line for deportation, include people guilty of a "significant misdemeanor" that includes domestic violence or sexual offenders, burglars, people guilty of gun offenses, drug dealers, or drunken drivers. A significant misdemeanor means that the person can be sentenced to a maximum of one year in jail, but not less than five days.
This status also includes "aliens convicted of three or more misdemeanor offenses" other than traffic offenses.
The final priority level describes those who have simply violated immigration laws, and may be allowed to stay if an officer determines they are not a threat to the United States and its laws.
However, even those falling within Priority One designation are not to be targeted for immediate deportation, Johnson says in the memo, as immigration officers are still permitted to determine if there are "compelling and exceptional factors that clearly indicate the alien is not a threat to national security, border security, or public safety and should not therefore be an enforcement priority."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/jeh-johnson-criminal-immigrant-deport/2014/11/22/id/609025/#ixzz3JpVwBRPB
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Priority Two offenders, or the second in line for deportation, include people guilty of a "significant misdemeanor" that includes domestic violence or sexual offenders, burglars, people guilty of gun offenses, drug dealers, or drunken drivers. A significant misdemeanor means that the person can be sentenced to a maximum of one year in jail, but not less than five days.
This status also includes "aliens convicted of three or more misdemeanor offenses" other than traffic offenses.
The final priority level describes those who have simply violated immigration laws, and may be allowed to stay if an officer determines they are not a threat to the United States and its laws.
However, even those falling within Priority One designation are not to be targeted for immediate deportation, Johnson says in the memo, as immigration officers are still permitted to determine if there are "compelling and exceptional factors that clearly indicate the alien is not a threat to national security, border security, or public safety and should not therefore be an enforcement priority."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/jeh-johnson-criminal-immigrant-deport/2014/11/22/id/609025/#ixzz3JpVwBRPB
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
MMMM… DHS Lists Illegals who are
Drunk Drivers, Sex Abusers, Drug Dealers, Gun Offenders Not Top Deportation
Priorities
This is unbelievable. So, when Obama said he
wanted to focus on the ‘felons, not the families’, he meant just the ones he
thought were dangerous enough. Apparently sex abusers and gun offenders aren’t
that dangerous.
Keep your guns loaded people. Things are
about to get crazy.
Clemente Sanchez: UNA GRAN
IDEA
Colocar a jubilados en las cárceles y a
delincuentes en residencias de ancianos.
De esta manera, nuestros ancianos tendrían acceso a una ducha todos los días, al ocio, cultura, educación y medicamentos.
Recibirían gratis sillas de ruedas, prótesis, anteojos.
No pagarían por su alojamiento y comida.
Tendrían vigilancia continua, por lo que de inmediato recibirían asistencia de emergencia.
Tendrían un lugar especial para recibir a su familia y visitas.
Tendrían acceso a una biblioteca, sala de ejercicios, campos de deportes, enseñanza gratuita y sala de TV en alta definición.
Además tendrían un sueldo de $ 5.600. El doble de lo que percibe actualmente.
En cambio los delincuentes tendrían:
Platos fríos y escasos, se quedarían solos y enrejados.
Las luces se apagarían a las 20:00 hrs.
Los atiborrarían de sedantes e hipnóticos para que no molestasen
Tendrían derecho a un baño a la semana.
Vivirían en una pequeña habitación compartida... y por la que tendrían que pagar al menos $ 2.000 pesos x mes, sin esperanza de salir con vida !
De esta forma habría justicia para todos
Abuel@: antes de ir a una residencia, elimine a un político y vaya a la cárcel.
De esta manera, nuestros ancianos tendrían acceso a una ducha todos los días, al ocio, cultura, educación y medicamentos.
Recibirían gratis sillas de ruedas, prótesis, anteojos.
No pagarían por su alojamiento y comida.
Tendrían vigilancia continua, por lo que de inmediato recibirían asistencia de emergencia.
Tendrían un lugar especial para recibir a su familia y visitas.
Tendrían acceso a una biblioteca, sala de ejercicios, campos de deportes, enseñanza gratuita y sala de TV en alta definición.
Además tendrían un sueldo de $ 5.600. El doble de lo que percibe actualmente.
En cambio los delincuentes tendrían:
Platos fríos y escasos, se quedarían solos y enrejados.
Las luces se apagarían a las 20:00 hrs.
Los atiborrarían de sedantes e hipnóticos para que no molestasen
Tendrían derecho a un baño a la semana.
Vivirían en una pequeña habitación compartida... y por la que tendrían que pagar al menos $ 2.000 pesos x mes, sin esperanza de salir con vida !
De esta forma habría justicia para todos
Abuel@: antes de ir a una residencia, elimine a un político y vaya a la cárcel.
¡¡¡¡¡PIÉNSELO!!!!!
UN PRESO LE CUESTA AL ESTADO $ 15.000 POR MES; UN JUBILADO $ 2.780,
Y SE TIENE QUE ARREGLAR COMO PUEDA.-
Enviado por Miriam Dopico. IN GOD WE MUST!!!
Willy Guardiola
Christian on a Mission
Cuban-born Catholic Republican Activist
** THOUGHT-PROVOKING MESSAGE FROM MIREYA
GEILIN **
Hi, Everyone,
For 200 years, Elementary civics
classes taught us the same: Congress makes the laws, the president enforces the
laws, and the judiciary interprets the laws, because our nation runs by division of power. But, when Obama suspended laws that
were already on the books to bless the illegal presence of millions of
foreigners in the U.S., he said "some laws can be tossed aside" and justified the lawlessness we live
in today.
Obama told us exactly what he planned to do in his 2008 inauguration. He
aimed to “fundamentally transform” America, and just proved it by importing
populations with cultural and legal traditions that are foreign to Americans.
Those cultural traditions are more than exotic foods and fun music. They are
instability in government, corruption, and civil unrest, with expectations that
"the system" is rigged, whether true or not.
Obama transformed our nation by transforming the country's fiber. He
transformed what every day Americans truly are, by changing our historythrough Common Core, destroying the best healthcare system in the world with Obamacare, chocking small businesses with
EPA regulations, and now importing foreigners, planting Democrat Party seeds in them, their
children and those yet born, so they become the radicals Obama needs to
perpetuate the Democrat Party for the next 200 years.
Obama tapped into 20th century history, when radicals took over power-
quickly, openly, brazenly; as he began nullifying laws he had sworn under oath to
uphold, and was supposed to enforce. Yes, Obama is playing the long game, and
many Americans feel they are impotent spectators living a horrible nightmare.
Yesterday, on Mexico's
"official" Revolution Day, mainly
on Hispanic stations, since most English-speaking channels did not broadcast
the speech, Obama announced he was fixing a broken process, and would use
executive action on immigration. This is an “impeachable offense” and Glenn Beck had choice words in the
video embedded below for the American public. “If you don’t stand up against this, what do
you think he’s going to do next?”
The majority of Americans don't like this crammed down our throats
through Executive Order, and law enforcement along the border likes it less.
Sacramento County Sheriff, Scott Jones, recorded a blistering message to the
president. “Only you (Obama) are singularly responsible
for the hands-off policy that exists in Homeland Security and it subsidiaries,
including Customs and Border Protection. Mr. President, they don’t need a raise
to improve morale in that organization, they need to be allowed to do their
jobs” Sheriff Jones
said.
Americans sent a message loud and clear on November 4th to the nation
and to the world. We didn't want Obama's policies, so we voted Republican and
colored the United States map Republican Red. But, what good did that do when we have a lawless president that thinks he is
king?
Unfortunately, as soon as the election's euphoria faded, and results
were logged on history books, the GOP leadership began to weaken. We had
majority in Congress, but HAD TO HAVE THE SENATE to make a stand. When we got the Senate,
we CAN'T DO MUCH UNTIL the
new members start on January, 2015. Next will they tell us we can't do much
because we don't have the White House, and we must wait until 2016?
The word out from GOP leaders on Fox News and Karl Rove is they don't
want us to react, so we don't offend Hispanics. Don't antagonize Latinos, no, no, no. Don't make waves... SHHHHHHHHH. But, how about ANTAGONIZING AMERICAN CITIZENS?
I am an immigrant, a LEGAL immigrant, and I thank God and my parents, who did things
right and followed the rule of the law. This country is where my child and
grandchildren were born, and I feel offended when I see other American citizens chastised, marginalized and even mocked in their own country by illegal
foreigners. As a Latina, that feels for a country with millions of unemployed citizens, overwhelmed by half of the country dependent
of government assistance, unable to give decent medical care to
returning veterans, I am furious to see the abuse illegals give our Border Patrols. http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/report-illegals-taunt-immigration-agents-as-they-await-amnesty-from-obama
The number one topic today on Facebook & Twitter was not Obama's
unconstitutional act, but what the GOP leadership was doing to control the tempers of Conservatives in DC. Word came down that Senate Majority,
Mitch McConnell, may even remove Senator Jeff Sessions from his position in the budget
committee. Jeff Sessions was the senator, who consistently spoke against
Obama’s amnesty, and even talked about using the Power of the Purse to prevent
immigration reform funding, as it was bad policy, unlawful and unworthy. Mitch McConnell does not allow dissentand nipped quickly all
topics he doesn't want voiced in public.
When an American president governs by Executive Order, he governs by
arbitrary power, his will is made, rather than the will of the people, and the
subversion of popular government happens, when the consent of the governed is
an afterthought. Obama has brazenly ignored laws to achieve his ends. But, what is the Republican response?
We've known that amnesty was coming down from Obama for weeks, yet the
day after he announces it, our Republican leaders are still scrambling for a
strategy, can't think of anything other than posturing, and preferred to leave town for the Thanksgiving holiday...
SERIOUSLY?
Our president tested the waters with his Executive Order on Immigration
last night, but there were NO protests, NO public outcries, NO formal protest. If we took this act against
our Constitution silently, more executive orders will come down soon, and more
illegals will benefit from Obama's misguided vision. Many, many more, get ready.
I have shared many links on this e-mail as back up, so you see where I
got my information from, but I beg you take time to listen to today's Mark
Levin Show (11/21/14) and hear first hand the frustration Mark, and many of us
have. Mark Levin Show:http://www.stationcaster.com/player_skinned.php?s=2591&c=10771&f=3659883
What ever happened to securing our borders first? Didn't we find proof of Muslim infiltration on
the border? Why are legislators only peeling off a few layers of Obamacare,
rather than repealing it
TOTALLY? Why is the government shutdown off the table?
Karl Rove & Fox News commentators say the government shutdown Senator Ted
Cruz initiated last year had devastating effects on our nation, but I am
confused. Didn't we just had a landslide and see the ENTIRE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TURN RED ON NOVEMBER 4TH, 2014, in spite
of the government shutdown?Couldn't this be media propaganda, and our
nation finally seeing life in the Republican Party?
Will the GOP recognize the dangerous line Obama has crossed, and use the
powers the Founders gave them to reign in executive lawlessness, or will they meekly punt the problem to the
courts? Many questions,
but no answer, and Obama sees our lack of response as our
weakness, so he prepares to attack again. The future of much more than
immigration policy is at stake, so fear cannot paralyze us, but it has, and the Left will take advantage of it.
We have enjoyed a heritage of freedom because of the vision of our
Founders, but the time has come to set our feet back on that original path, so we may pass the torch of liberty to the next generation.
Federalism is, no doubt, one of those original principles that we must embrace,
and work to reestablish as a fortress against that age-old desire for absolute power.
Our country turned into a "banana republic/third world
country" right before our eyes. The rule of law is dead, and we welcomed
the FIRST DICTATOR the United States ever
had... Barack H. Obama.
Now, what are we going to do about it?
No one is more capable of squandering a political victory than the
Republican Party, and since our leaders packed up and went on vacation for the
holiday, I will do the same. Please
take time to thank the Lord on Thanksgiving for His blessings, hug hard your
loved ones, pray for wisdom and guidance in these troubled times, and may God bless the United States of America, now and forever.
New Black Panther Members Arrested with Bombs
Near Ferguson
The racists aren’t going to let this end without lots of chaos.
Check it out:
Check it out:
The
FBI arrested two men earlier this week on firearms charges as part of increased
law enforcement presence in Ferguson, Missouri, ahead of a grand jury decision
in the shooting death of Michael Brown.
Court
documents show Brandon Orlando Baldwin and Olajuwon Davis face charges of
making false written statements in connection with a firearms purchase and aiding
and abetting. FBI spokeswoman Rebecca Wu told CBS News the suspects were arrested on
outstanding warrants.
A law enforcement source said the two men allegedly purchased
explosive material during an FBI undercover operation to possibly use during
Ferguson protests.
Court
documents show Baldwin and Davis were arrested and charged with the illegal
purchase of two Hi-Point .45 ACP pistols.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/new-black-panther-members-arrested-bombs-near-ferguson/
Amenper: La Caída del Imperio Romano
Una de las razones detrás del éxito del imperio
romano era que los romanos eran extraordinariamente efectivos incorporando las
diferentes culturas que conquistaron a través de los siglos.
En lugar de oprimir a los diversos pueblos que
vivían bajo la bandera del Imperio, Roma en su mayor parte (con algunas
excepciones notables) les permitió mantener su identidad cultural al tiempo que
también engendrando una asociación fuerte con la mentalidad de la cultura
"Romana".
Las fronteras Romanas era un aspecto muy importante
del bienestar del imperio.
Durante al menos dos siglos de la época del
emperador Augustus en adelante la actitud era substancialmente una del
imperialismo no agresivo para garantizar la seguridad fronteriza-
Un análisis de los patrones de migración en la
antigua Roma es un buen indicador de un número de factores económicos
importantes que influyó en el ascenso y caída de las fortunas de Roma.
La inmigración fue uno de los aspectos que
caracterizan la decadencia del imperio romano.
Las tribus germánicas, bajo la presión de las
amenazas del este y el hambre pidieron entrar en territorio romano fueron
rechazados pero finalmente irrumpieron, infiltrándose en territorio
romano.
Del mismo modo existe la llamada "rescriptos
de Honorius" en el cual emperador Honorius dice esencialmente que el
imperio debe de ayudar a los britanos: Los recursos del Imperio fueron
estirados y los confines externos se convirtieron en menos seguros.
La integración de los llamados bárbaros en la
sociedad romana tuvo efectos duraderos, dramáticos en el Imperio, y fue un
factor contribuyente a su caída.
Esta es una lección que debemos aprender en
América. Como el Imperio Romano, América es un país que ha sido receptivo a la
inmigración de diversas personas de diferentes culturas, pero como Roma estas
personas manteniendo su identidad cultural, también fueron engendrando una
fuerte asociación a la cultura americana, se asimilaron con el estilo de vida
americano, en lo que se denominó el crisol fundido (Melting Pot).
Como Roma, ahora estamos teniendo problemas de
control de su frontera y como Roma, América está enfrentándose al peligro de la
caída de su cultura y de la caída de la nación.
Poco se dice en los medios de comunicación de
nuestras fronteras porosas como realmente son.
Pero en muchos lugares a lo largo de nuestra
frontera sur, cualquiera puede entrar en nuestro país; No sabemos quiénes son,
ni de donde vinieron.
Sin embargo, los políticos con una agenda, dicen
que ellos van a encarar las fronteras porosas, después de que se conceda la
amnistía quienes han entrado aquí ilegalmente... que es lo mismo que
cerrar la puerta del establo después de que las vacas se han escapado.
Las fronteras necesitan estar bloqueadas ahora,
firmemente, primero, antes de hablar de qué hacer con aquellos ya aquí
ilegalmente.
Ningún país conserva su carácter y su soberanía si
no controla sus fronteras-
El imperio romano aprendió por las
malas, otros países a lo largo de la historia han aprendido esto también, los
países de la Unión Europea también lo están experimentando ahora.
¿Por qué no aprendemos de los errores de otros?
¿Por qué vamos a sufrir los resultados que ya nos enseñó la historia?
Pepe Cancio: Chicago, Chicago... it's a hell of a town.... 
Very interesting...Note this. A US State with zero Republicans in office
-The State of Illinois. Think about this...Some interesting data on the state of Illinois:
-There are more people on welfare in Illinois than there are people working.
-Chicago pays the highest wages to teachers than anywhere else in the U.S. averaging $110,000/year.
Their pensions average 80-90% of their income. Wow! Are Illinois and Chicago great or what?
Body count: In the last six months, 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago. 221killed in Iraq; AND Chicago has one of the strictest gun laws in the entire US.
The Chicago chain of command:
President: Barack Hussein Obama.
Senator: Dick Durbin.
House Representative: Jesse Jackson Jr.
Governor: Pat Quinn.
House leader: Mike Madigan.
Atty. Gen.: Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike).
Mayor: Rohm Emanuel.
The leadership in Illinois- all Democrats.
Thank you for the combat zone in Chicago.
Of course, they are all blaming each other - can't blame Republicans, there aren't any!
Chicago school system rated one of the WORST in the U.S.A,
State pension fund $78 Billion in debt, worst in country.
Cook County (Chicago)sales tax 10.25% highest in country.
This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois. And he went to fix Washington politics for us?
George Ryan is no longer Governor, he is in prison.
Ryan was replaced by Rob Blagojevich who is, that's right, also in prison.
And Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. who resigned a few months ago, that's right, is also in prison.
The Land of Lincoln, where our governors make our license plates.
But you know what?
As long as they keep providing entitlements to the population of Chicago, nothing is going to change, except the state will go broke before the country does.
"Anybody who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian."
And check this last set of statistics!!
Very interesting...Note this. A US State with zero Republicans in office
-The State of Illinois. Think about this...Some interesting data on the state of Illinois:
-There are more people on welfare in Illinois than there are people working.
-Chicago pays the highest wages to teachers than anywhere else in the U.S. averaging $110,000/year.
Their pensions average 80-90% of their income. Wow! Are Illinois and Chicago great or what?
Body count: In the last six months, 292 killed (murdered) in Chicago. 221killed in Iraq; AND Chicago has one of the strictest gun laws in the entire US.
The Chicago chain of command:
President: Barack Hussein Obama.
Senator: Dick Durbin.
House Representative: Jesse Jackson Jr.
Governor: Pat Quinn.
House leader: Mike Madigan.
Atty. Gen.: Lisa Madigan (daughter of Mike).
Mayor: Rohm Emanuel.
The leadership in Illinois- all Democrats.
Thank you for the combat zone in Chicago.
Of course, they are all blaming each other - can't blame Republicans, there aren't any!
Chicago school system rated one of the WORST in the U.S.A,
State pension fund $78 Billion in debt, worst in country.
Cook County (Chicago)sales tax 10.25% highest in country.
This is the political culture that Obama comes from in Illinois. And he went to fix Washington politics for us?
George Ryan is no longer Governor, he is in prison.
Ryan was replaced by Rob Blagojevich who is, that's right, also in prison.
And Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. who resigned a few months ago, that's right, is also in prison.
The Land of Lincoln, where our governors make our license plates.
But you know what?
As long as they keep providing entitlements to the population of Chicago, nothing is going to change, except the state will go broke before the country does.
"Anybody who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian."
And check this last set of statistics!!
The percentage of each past President's cabinet who had worked in the
private business sector prior to their appointment to the cabinet.....
You know what the private business sector is - a real-life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages: look!!!
T. Roosevelt................ 38%
Taft................................40%
Wilson......................... 52%
Harding......................... 49%
Coolidge....................... 48%
Hoover..........................42%
F. Roosevelt................ 50%
Truman..........................50%
Eisenhower.................. 57%
Kennedy........................30%
Johnson.........................47%
Nixon..............................53%
Ford................................42%
Carter.............................32%
Reagan...........................56%
GH Bush.........................51%
Clinton........................... 39%
GW Bush........................55%
Obama........................... 8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration, only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent -- the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!
And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business?
You know what the private business sector is - a real-life business, not a government job. Here are the percentages: look!!!
T. Roosevelt................ 38%
Taft................................40%
Wilson......................... 52%
Harding......................... 49%
Coolidge....................... 48%
Hoover..........................42%
F. Roosevelt................ 50%
Truman..........................50%
Eisenhower.................. 57%
Kennedy........................30%
Johnson.........................47%
Nixon..............................53%
Ford................................42%
Carter.............................32%
Reagan...........................56%
GH Bush.........................51%
Clinton........................... 39%
GW Bush........................55%
Obama........................... 8%
This helps to explain the incompetence of this administration, only 8% of them have ever worked in private business!
That's right! Only eight percent -- the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!
And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business?
How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business?
Here's how you can stop
amnesty
Actions: Michael Needham
Michael Needham
Mr. Lazaro R Gonzalez, “En mi
opinion”
Barack Obama has announced a lawless and
unconstitutional plan to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.
This action purposely bypasses Congress, the
elected voice of the American people, and ignores the Constitution.
This dispute is between the President and the
American people.
And hardworking Americans must rise up and
demand Congress use its constitutional power of the purse to block amnesty.
Congress needs to know that the American
people are not on board with the President's agenda and that you want action now.
Lazaro R Gonzalez, the fight over immigration
policy is critical to our nation's future. We are a nation of immigrants, and
that is important. But we are also a nation of laws. The President has taken
lawless actions to decree an unconstitutional and unfair policy. And we are firing
back.
Can I count on you to stand with Heritage
Action in this fight?
Thank you for your perseverance and swift
action.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Needham
Chief Executive Officer
Heritage Action for America
Chief Executive Officer
Heritage Action for America
P.S. Blocking executive amnesty is the
greatest fight we face, and the outcome will have significant repercussions to
our nation's future. I urge you to get involved and support
us in the fight to stop Obama's amnesty.
Some Republican Should Announce Today: “I Am
Running to Repeal Obama’s Amnesty.”
This is a
moment of opportunity. Some Republican Senator or Governor should announce his
candidacy for the Republican nomination for President in 2016. He should
announce his reason: “I will repeal by executive order President Obama’s
executive action granting amnesty to five million illegal aliens.”
That
announcement would make him the front-runner. It would galvanize the Republican
voter base. It would steal millions of Democrats.
He would
then hammer on this for two years. This would be his promise: “My first act as
President will be to repeal this unconstitutional monstrosity. I will sign my
executive order when I give my inaugural address.”
The
Republican who did this today — no hesitation, no straw polls — would turn all
the other would-be candidates into: “Me, too.” It would preempt all of
them.
Obama
torpedoed Hillary yesterday.
She is now on the defensive.
Some
Republican could launch the second torpedo this afternoon. “Come out of the
shadows, Mrs. Clinton. Make your position clear. Do you or don’t you favor what
President Obama did on November 20? No waffling. Yes or no?”
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/11/21/republican-announce-today-running-repeal-obamas-amnesty/#JhjGSB9rChv975w1.99
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/11/21/republican-announce-today-running-repeal-obamas-amnesty/#JhjGSB9rChv975w1.99
Amenper: El Error de Cálculo de Obama y otros Liberales
Si revisamos la población denominada “Hispana” o
"Latina" en la nación, los lugares de más densidad hispana en
comparación a la población total son New México con el 47%, Texas con el 38.2%,
California con el 38.2%, Arizona con el 30.2% y Nevada con el 27.5.
% y Florida con el 23.2%-.
La Gobernadora de New México, el estado de mayor densidad hispana, es
republicana, Ted Cruz y el gobernador electo de Texas son Republicanos, el
gobernador de Nevada es Brian Sandoval, republicano. Jan Brewner el gobernador
de Arizona es republicano, así como el Senador McCain que ha sido uno de los senadores
que por más veces ha sido re-elegido. Y todos sabemos que Rick Scott-López
Cantera son los electos para la gobernación de la Florida y que Marco Rubio es
el sanador del estado, y que todos son Republicanos.
Todos se oponen a la acción ejecutiva de Obama sobre inmigración.
Solo queda California, pero California es un planeta aparte.
Por eso creo que Obama ha hecho un error de cálculo, y quizás se debe a la
percepción de que el voto hispano es demócrata sin remedio.
George W. Bush sacó el 45% del voto hispano, (observen la diferencia entre
el voto negro 95% demócrata) y el aumento de la inmigración desde entonces
se trata mayormente de indocumentados que no votan (al menos legalmente).
Si los republicanos lo toman con calma, y esperan a que pase el año, y
presenta una reforma migratoria con el control de las fronteras efectivo, el
presidente tendrá que vetarlo y desprestigiarse, o aceptarlo y entonces los
republicanos serán el partido de los hispanos.
Al menos de los ciudadanos Americanos de origen hispano.
Hay que pensar bien en esto de inmigración. Muchos hispanos no están de
acuerdo, y las estadísticas de arriba lo muestran. O sea que de la población
hispana que es aproximadamente el 11% del total de la población, quizás
conservadoramente más del 4% no está de acuerdo con una amnistía. Tampoco
están muchos negros y miembros de las uniones que temen que los hispanos les
roben trabajos, y también, sobre todo en los estados del sur, hay los racistas
que no aceptan a nadie con un apellido hispano por considerarlos
inferiores. Si sumamos todas estas diferentes fracciones, estos
raros compañeros de cama suman una cantidad que es lo que me hace pensar que
Obama cometió un error de cálculo, los “hispanos” que están de acuerdo son sólo
un 7% del toal de los votantes, y quizás menos si los Republicanos saben jugar
el juego.
Primero, porque los hispanos son decisivos solamente si tomamos en
consideración a otras fracciones, algunas de las cuales como expico arriba no
están de acuerdo con la aminsitía. Segundo, los hispanos no son homogéneos como
equivocadamente lo consideran. Todo esto sin tomar en consideración
la actitud dictatorial que también le traerá un rechazo de otra parte de la
opinión pública
Abajo les paso el editorial del Wall Street Journal de hoy, que aconseja a
los republicanos lo que deben hacer para contrarrestar la ilegalidad de la
acción ejecutiva de Obama.
Y como es el carácter del Journal, lo que aconsejan es una medida mesurada
y pragmática, la cual creo la indicada en este momento.
Ferguson Cop
Darren Wilson to Resign
This poor guy’s life has been ruined. All for
doing his job.
Check it out:
Check it out:
Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson, who
shot and killed teenager Michael Brown on August 9, is in the final stages of
negotiations with city officials to resign, according to people close to the
talks.
Wilson
maintains he hasn’t done anything wrong, and the resignation talks have hinged
on whether a grand jury returns an indictment against him in the death of
Brown, people close to the talks said.
Wilson
has told associates he would resign as a way to help ease pressure and protect
his fellow officers. Wilson has expressed concern about resigning while the
grand jury was hearing evidence for fear it would appear he was admitting
fault. Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2014/11/ferguson-cop-darren-wilson-resign/
IN GOD WE MUST!!!
Willy Guardiola
Christian on a Mission
Cuban-born Catholic Republican Activist
** THOUGHT-PROVOKING MESSAGE FROM MIREYA
GEILIN **
Hi, Everyone,
For 200 years, Elementary civics classes taught us the same: Congress
makes the laws, the president enforces the laws, and the judiciary interprets
the laws, because our nation runs by division of power. But, when Obama suspended laws that
were already on the books to bless the illegal presence of millions of foreigners
in the U.S., he said "some laws can be tossed aside"and
justified the lawlessness we live in today.
Obama told us exactly what he planned to do in his 2008 inauguration. He
aimed to “fundamentally transform” America, and just proved it by importing
populations with cultural and legal traditions that are foreign to Americans.
Those cultural traditions are more than exotic foods and fun music. They are
instability in government, corruption, and civil unrest, with expectations that
"the system" is rigged, whether true or not.
Obama transformed our nation by transforming the country's fiber. He
transformed what every day Americans truly are, bychanging our history through
Common Core, destroying the best healthcare system in the world with Obamacare, chocking small businesses with
EPA regulations, and now importing foreigners, planting Democrat Party seeds in them, their
children and those yet born, so they become the radicals Obama needs to
perpetuate the Democrat Party for the next 200 years.
Obama tapped into 20th century history, when radicals took over power-
quickly, openly, brazenly; as he began nullifying laws he had sworn under oath
to uphold, and was supposed to enforce. Yes, Obama is playing the long game, and
many Americans feel they are impotent spectators living a horrible nightmare.
Yesterday, on Mexico's
"official" Revolution Day, mainly
on Hispanic stations, since most English-speaking channels did not broadcast
the speech, Obama announced he was fixing a broken process, and would use executive
action on immigration. This is an “impeachable offense” and Glenn Beck had choice words in the
video embedded below for the American public. “If you don’t stand up against this, what do
you think he’s going to do next?”
The majority of Americans don't like this crammed down our throats
through Executive Order, and law enforcement along the border likes it less.
Sacramento County Sheriff, Scott Jones, recorded a blistering message to the
president. “Only you (Obama) are singularly responsible
for the hands-off policy that exists in Homeland Security and it subsidiaries,
including Customs and Border Protection. Mr. President, they don’t need a raise
to improve morale in that organization, they need to be allowed to do their
jobs” Sheriff Jones
said.
Americans sent a message loud and clear on November 4th to the nation
and to the world. We didn't want Obama's policies, so we voted Republican and
colored the United States map Republican Red. But, what good did that do when we have a lawless president that thinks he is
king?
Unfortunately, as soon as the election's euphoria faded, and results
were logged on history books, the GOP leadership began to weaken. We had
majority in Congress, but HAD TO HAVE THE SENATE to make a stand. When we got the
Senate, we CAN'T DO MUCH UNTIL the new members start on January,
2015. Next will they tell us we can't do much because we don't have the White
House, and we must wait until 2016?
The word out from GOP leaders on Fox News and Karl Rove is they don't
want us to react, so we don't offend Hispanics. Don't antagonize Latinos, no, no, no. Don't make waves... SHHHHHHHHH. But, how about ANTAGONIZING AMERICAN CITIZENS?
I am an immigrant, a LEGAL immigrant, and I thank God and my parents, who did things
right and followed the rule of the law. This country is where my child and
grandchildren were born, and I feel offended when I see other American citizens chastised, marginalized and even mocked in their own country by illegal
foreigners. As a Latina, that feels for a country with millions of unemployed citizens, overwhelmed by half of the country dependent
of government assistance, unable to give decent medical care to
returning veterans, I am furious to see the abuse illegals give our Border Patrols. http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/report-illegals-taunt-immigration-agents-as-they-await-amnesty-from-obama
The number one topic today on Facebook & Twitter was not Obama's
unconstitutional act, but what the GOP leadership was doing to control the tempers of Conservatives in DC. Word came down that Senate Majority,
Mitch McConnell, may evenremove Senator
Jeff Sessions from his
position in the budget committee. Jeff Sessions was the senator, who
consistently spoke against Obama’s amnesty, and even talked about using the
Power of the Purse to prevent immigration reform funding, as it was bad policy,
unlawful and unworthy. Mitch McConnell does not allow dissent and nipped quickly all topics he
doesn't want voiced in public.
When an American president governs by Executive Order, he governs by
arbitrary power, his will is made, rather than the will of the people, and the
subversion of popular government happens, when the consent of the governed is
an afterthought. Obama has brazenly ignored laws to achieve his ends. But, what is the Republican response?
We've known that amnesty was coming down from Obama for weeks, yet the
day after he announces it, our Republican leaders are still scrambling for a
strategy, can't think of anything other than posturing, and preferred to leave town for the Thanksgiving holiday...
SERIOUSLY?
Our president tested the waters with his Executive Order on Immigration
last night, but there were NO protests, NO public outcries, NO formal protest. If we took this act against
our Constitution silently, more executive orders will come down soon, and more
illegals will benefit from Obama's misguided vision. Many, many more, get ready.
I have shared many links on this e-mail as back up, so you see where I
got my information from, but I beg you take time to listen to today's Mark
Levin Show (11/21/14) and hear first hand the frustration Mark, and many of us
have. Mark Levin Show:http://www.stationcaster.com/player_skinned.php?s=2591&c=10771&f=3659883
What ever happened to securing our borders first? Didn't we find proof of Muslim infiltration on
the border? Why are legislators only peeling off a few layers of Obamacare,
rather than repealing it
TOTALLY? Why is the government shutdown off the table?
Karl Rove & Fox News commentators say the government shutdown Senator Ted
Cruz initiated last year had devastating effects on our nation, but I am
confused. Didn't we just had a landslide and see the ENTIRE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES TURN RED ON NOVEMBER 4TH, 2014, in spite
of the government shutdown? Couldn't
this be media propaganda, and our nation finally seeing life in the Republican
Party?
Will the GOP recognize the dangerous line Obama has crossed, and use the
powers the Founders gave them to reign in executive lawlessness, or will they meekly punt the problem to the
courts? Many questions,
but no answer, and Obama sees our lack of response as our
weakness, so he prepares to attack again. The future of much more than
immigration policy is at stake, so fear cannot paralyze us, but it has, and the Left will take advantage of it.
We have enjoyed a heritage of freedom because of the vision of our
Founders, but the time has come to set our feet back on that original path, so we may pass the torch of liberty to the next generation.
Federalism is, no doubt, one of those original principles that we must embrace,
and work to reestablish as a fortress against that age-old desire for absolute power.
Our country turned into a "banana republic/third world
country" right before our eyes. The rule of law is dead, and we welcomed
the FIRST DICTATOR the United States ever
had... Barack H. Obama.
Now, what are we going to do about it?
No one is more capable of squandering a political victory than the
Republican Party, and since our leaders packed up and went on vacation for the
holiday, I will do the same. Please
take time to thank the Lord on Thanksgiving for His blessings, hug hard your
loved ones, pray for wisdom and guidance in these troubled times, and may God bless the United States of America, now and forever.
Amenper: Bill Crosby
Bill Crosby ha sido acusado de
acoso sexual y rapto por tres mujeres, hoy apareció otra,
así que son cuatro hasta ahora, y no solo le costará millones de dólares en
abogados, pero Hollywood le ha pasado la cuenta y su carrera terminará.
No creo que Crosby sea
culpable de rapto o de haber violado a ninguna de esas mujeres.
Creo que posiblemente si haya
sido mujeriego y debe de haber tenido sexo con todas ellas.
Pero no creo que con el tipo
de personalidad que él era en Hollywood, hubiera tenido que imponerse para
tener sexo con ellas, seguro que le sobraban las mujeres en un ambiente en que
las mujeres buscan relaciones con hombres famosos para poder avanzar en el
medio.
¿Cuál es el
problema? Porque tener una vida promiscua, si fuera verdad no
debiera ser un problema en Hollywood, si fuera un problema, Hollywood se
quedaría sin artistas.
El problema es que Bill Crosby
es un hombre famoso y respetado, y también es que era un negro y que
sus programas eran considerado como un ejemplo para cambiar el tipo de vida de
los negros.
Donde surge el mayor problema
es que Bill Crosby era políticamente incorrecto en la comunidad.
Bill Crosby era conservador, y
negro esto unido a su fama, era un problema, y un problema se resuelve en
Hollywood de la manera que los están resolviendo con las mujeres que le han
echado a Crosby.
Lo curioso en estos casos, es
que cuando la persona que acusan de violación es un artista liberal, los medios
de comunicación no le dan mucha cobertura o lo justifican, ya sea un artista o
un político.
Bill Clinton, siempre ha sido
justificado por la prensa a pesar de su portañuela alegre.
No sólo lo justifican
sino que lo ensalza, como se dice coloquialmente, le ríen la gracia.
Pero si se trata de Bill
Crosby, no paran de denigrarlo y condenarlo antes de que realmente se haya
podido probar de que alguno de los casos tenga validez.
Pero es que para los
liberales, todo es política y todo es válido.
Leaked
Emails Prove Obama Admin Intentionally Targeted Whistleblowing Reporter
"Is this how you envision your tax
dollars being spent?"
Documents
disclosed regarding the Fast and Furious scandal to conservative watchdog group
Judicial Watch reveals the United States Department of Justice believed that
former CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson was “out of control.”
Judicial Watch obtained 10,112 documents comprised of about
42,000 pages. The correspondence shows former United States Department of
Justice (DOJ) Spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler talking with White House Deputy Press
Secretary Eric
Schultz about
how “out of control” Attkisson has been in covering Fast and Furious; Schmaler
intended on contacting her editor and host of CBS’s Face The Nation, Bob Schieffer.
“I”m also
calling Sharryl’s editor and reaching out to Scheiffer. She’s out of control.”
Judicial Watch
This
correspondence was from October 2011, when The White House denied any knowledge
of the gun running scandal, even though reports show that they were briefed on
the matter in 2010, The Daily Caller reported at the time.
Attkisson,
who was with CBS News for more than two decades, left in March 2014 amid frustration on her part that her
investigative pieces did not make the CBS Evening News more frequently. This is
how she responded to the documents on Twitter:
“Now there
have always been tensions, there have always been calls from the White House
under any administration i assume, when they don’t like a particular story.
“But it is
particularly aggressive under the Obama administration and I think it’s a
campaign that’s very well organized, that’s designed to have sort of a chilling
effect and to some degree has been somewhat successful in getting broadcast
producers who don’t really want to deal with the headache of it.
“Why put
on these controversial stories that we’re going to have to fight people on,
when we can fill the broadcast with other perfectly decent stories that don’t
ruffle the same feathers?”
Schultz
also told Schmaler he was sending her the National Journal’s Susan Davis, who
was writing on House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Darrell Issa
(R-California) and could “load her up on leaks,” after her last piece “was
really bad for the AG.” A few weeks later, Davis wrote a critical piece on
on Issa, as pointed out by Human Events.
Schmaler left the DOJ in March 2013 after being caught colluding
with left wing media watchdog organization Media Matters for America, and now
works for a firm connected to former Obama adviser David Axelrod.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/former-department-justice-official-says-sharyl-attkisson-control/#ZdVuei8SKW9edoiM.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/former-department-justice-official-says-sharyl-attkisson-control/#ZdVuei8SKW9edoiM.99
Sen. Ron Johnson on Amnesty: Cynical Move for 'Political Gain'
Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson tells Newsmax that President Barack Obama is
using executive action on immigration as a "political weapon" and
he's "poking a stick" in the eyes of the Republicans.
"What he's serious about is using immigration cynically for political gain. He's using it as a political weapon," Johnson told J.D. Hayworth on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TVFriday.
Story continues below video Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now
"What he's serious about is using immigration cynically for political gain. He's using it as a political weapon," Johnson told J.D. Hayworth on "America's Forum" on Newsmax TVFriday.
Story continues below video Note: Watch Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now
"If he was really serious about passing the bill, which he was
taunting us to do, he would've worked with us to find an agreement to start
doing this in a common sense approach," he explained. The Wisconsin Republican contends that
there was a lot in Obama's immigration plan, which he described in his speech
Thursday night, that Republicans agree on and that those areas of "common
ground" could have been a good place to start negotiations to begin to
"build a level of trust."
"Last night, the first thing he talked about was more resources, the border, speed return and return criminals first — we agree on that. Let's do that," he explained.
"High skilled laborers — there's a great deal of agreement on that — let's keep the brightest minds in the world here in America to help our economy," he said.
"Where we start running into areas of disagreement . . . in terms of what we should do is with the people that are already here and the timing of how we should do it — we don't agree on that yet," he contends.
"Last night, the first thing he talked about was more resources, the border, speed return and return criminals first — we agree on that. Let's do that," he explained.
"High skilled laborers — there's a great deal of agreement on that — let's keep the brightest minds in the world here in America to help our economy," he said.
"Where we start running into areas of disagreement . . . in terms of what we should do is with the people that are already here and the timing of how we should do it — we don't agree on that yet," he contends.
"Let's do the first things we agree on first and worry about the
areas of disagreement in the second step in the process, but he's not giving us
that opportunity," Johnson explained.
"He's poking a stick in our eye, he's making it far more difficult to pass a bill, and he knows that, which is why he's starting the relationship with the new Congress by picking a fight rather than trying to find common ground," he said.
Story continues below video
Johnson also contends that if Obama was really serious about immigration reform "he would've done it in the first year," but the Wisconsin senator thinks that "he's not serious about fixing the problem."
In addition, he fears that the president's actions "will create incentive" for more illegal immigrants to come into the country.
"Let's reduce the flow, let's reduce the incentives for illegal immigration," he said.
"President Obama's unilateral action is going to increase that and exacerbate the problem," he said.
"That's why you have to secure the border first before you do these other things," he explained, adding that the Deferred Action of Childhood Admissions (DACA) is "probably the best example we could use as a predictor of what might happen."
"He's poking a stick in our eye, he's making it far more difficult to pass a bill, and he knows that, which is why he's starting the relationship with the new Congress by picking a fight rather than trying to find common ground," he said.
Story continues below video
Johnson also contends that if Obama was really serious about immigration reform "he would've done it in the first year," but the Wisconsin senator thinks that "he's not serious about fixing the problem."
In addition, he fears that the president's actions "will create incentive" for more illegal immigrants to come into the country.
"Let's reduce the flow, let's reduce the incentives for illegal immigration," he said.
"President Obama's unilateral action is going to increase that and exacerbate the problem," he said.
"That's why you have to secure the border first before you do these other things," he explained, adding that the Deferred Action of Childhood Admissions (DACA) is "probably the best example we could use as a predictor of what might happen."
"Obama's memorandum on the Deferred Action of Childhood Admissions
did not apply to anybody coming into the country currently, but it did
apply," he said.
"We can't trust President Obama to even enforce the letter of his own memorandum, much less the letter of the law that has been passed previously," he contends.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/SenRon-Johnson-Obama-amnesty/2014/11/21/id/608854/#ixzz3Jjn2vXNU
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
"We can't trust President Obama to even enforce the letter of his own memorandum, much less the letter of the law that has been passed previously," he contends.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/SenRon-Johnson-Obama-amnesty/2014/11/21/id/608854/#ixzz3Jjn2vXNU
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
OBAMA’S AMNESTY DECLARATION: REPUDIATING THE ELECTION THAT
REPUDIATED HIM
Barack Obama ceased to
be the President of the United States on Thursday night. He’s still
occupying the Oval Office, of course, but it’s not the same office any of his
predecessors held. It’s an insult to all of them, Democrat and Republican
alike, to refer to Obama as “President.” They all held office under a
rule of law that no longer exists. When he talks about taking action
because he’s tired of waiting for Congress to pass a bill, he is transcending
every imaginable Constitutional interpretation of his authority as president.
There is no clause that gives him more power because Congress doesn’t do
what he wants.
It didn’t die suddenly, mind you – Thursday
night’s declaration of amnesty for illegal aliens, in violation of the
Constitution, Obama’s oath of office, and the express will of the American
people was just the next step in a long degenerative process. Depending
on how things shake out, it might not be as big of a step as ObamaCare was –
look at how much of the Constitution had to be sacrificed so that could live, from the end
of First Amendment protections for religious liberty, to Obama’s lawless ad hoc
revision of the law for political needs, to the Supreme Court keeping it alive
by hatching a strange new creature known as the “tax/penalty.” If the
Supreme Court rules the wrong way on its review of King v Burwell, our
Constitutional order will be changed once again, giving our rulers new power to
disregard what laws actually say, and act according to what they now believe
the authors of the law probably intended. The Constitution has had a rough
six years under assault from a leader who evidently studied it only so he could
learn how to kill it, and it’s not over yet.
But last night an important line was crossed – a
Rubicon, if you will, since imperial Roman allegories are all the rage right
now, and Ted Cruz is quoting Cicero on the Senate floor. The Rubicon wasn’t
just a significant boundary; it was a line that could not be uncrossed.
That’s clearly what Emperor Obama thinks amnesty is, and it’s doubtless
what his munchkins have been telling nervous Democrats behind the scenes: hang tough, we might get creamed in 2016 for
this, but after that we won’t have to worry about elections ever again.
The process I’m beginning today will change the electorate forever, and
that process cannot be stopped.
We’ll see about that, because as liberals are
forever failing to understand, no story ends with a speech, the passage of a
bill, or (now that passing bills is obsolete) the signing of an imperial
decree. Some observers have noted that Obama might have trouble exerting
the dictatorial powers he has claimed. Legal challenges may yet hold the
despot in check. His estimation of the political calculus could be
mistaken, portending a 2016 election that will shock everyone but him as much
as 2014 did. One continues to hear rumblings that at least half a dozen Democrats could break with Obama on amnesty, but the
pressures brought to bear against the caucus to keep renegades in line will
be enormous… and
frankly, if I were doing Obama’s bare-knuckle backroom work, I’d bluntly tell
these red-state Democrats that no significant number of voters will believe
their “break” from Obama is genuine or meaningful anyway. I’m sure that
point will be
quietly made to them, since part of Obama’s spin on the midterm elections has
been that running away from him didn’t win many races, and while his flacks
obviously wouldn’t put it this way in public, voter skepticism about the
sincerity of their anti-Obama claims was part of the reason why.
The short-term political calculus might be off,
too. The media action line today is that our benevolent Emperor has
showered benefits upon deserving people, and anyone who challenges his edict is
a racist (the Democrats’ official social media account went so far as to accuse Republicans of desiring ethnic cleansing.) A big part of the euphoric
reaction from leftists today comes from the excitement of a defiant Obama
repudiating the midterm election that repudiated him, and ordering a crusade
his dejected followers can get frisky about joining. They can’t wait to fill cyberspace with
taunts that all dissent from the imperial decree is racist. The more
politically savvy members of the Obama Lollipop Guild are hoping spaghetti-spined
Republican leaders will follow Jeb Bush’s lead and surrender to the Emperor, after mumbling a
few complaints about how terribly outrageous it all is, and maybe some excuses
about how they don’t think there’s anything they can really do to stop him…
followed by a heavy sigh and promise to give Obama what he wants in a
“comprehensive immigration reform” bill after all. That would trigger a
Republican civil war that would make 2016 look a lot brighter for the
Democrats.
But this sort of outrage
can electrify the opposition, too. The inevitable overplaying of this
political card by overheated Obama supporters will increase the opposition’s
voltage. If it was possible to insult the American people into
submission, Democrats wouldn’t have been massacred in the midterm elections.
Capering around the Internet shouting, “Screw your stupid midterm election
– the President you strongly disapprove of just gave you and your stupid
Congress a big middle finger!” might feel good for a few days, but it’s not
going to broaden the Democrat coalition.
Conservatives are rising to the occasion and
waxing eloquent about the Republic that was formally abolished on Thursday
night. Those papers and speeches will find many receptive ears, for the
simple reason that Americans
don’t want amnesty, and they have long since fallen out of
love with Barack Obama. It’s not going to get popular just because Obama
gave a speech and his media sycophants dissolved into puddles of quivering goo.
It’s not even a terribly popular idea with Hispanics – and let’s not
forget that the open racism
of Obama’s political calculations is another disturbing feature of this move.
Racial politics should not become more palatable to any American based on which
race gets pandered to, even if - especially
when - it’s the race you happen to belong to. In any
event, a recent NBC News poll
found that Latino voters support Obama’s amnesty by only 43-37 – a six-point
edge that gets even smaller when measured against the significant Latino bias
towards the Democrat Party. 43-37 means a great deal of Hispanic voters
who supported Obama in both elections, and have never voted for a Republican in
their lives, oppose him on this.
And well they should, because as Obama’s speech
last night made clear, he has nothing
to say to legal citizens looking for opportunity in the tough
economy he has created. If the imperial amnesty decree holds, and the
expected tidal wave of new illegals washes across the border, legal citizens
who happen to look like them will still be losing their jobs. There isn’t
going to be any special dispensation for an honorable immigrant born in Mexico
who spent a decade, and thousands of dollars, doing things the right way.
Such legal immigrants and their children will suffer just like the rest
of us as millions of new low-skilled workers are poured into an economy that
already has deep-seated problems producing entry-level jobs. The more
clear that becomes to legal citizens who hail from Central and South America, and
especially to their children and grandchildren, the more amnesty politics are
likely to shift. Latino voters might not be thrilled that the Emperor
bizarrely decided to characterize them as fruit-pickers and bed-makers last night,
either. Let’s see what the growing chorus of angry responses from
betrayed legal immigrants to Obama’s amnesty giveaway does to public opinion.
Public opinion was already against this, and
that’s what makes Obama’s amnesty decree such a Rubicon moment. Past
usurpations of power and violations of the Constitution have generally been
accompanied by some argle-bargle about how the ambitious politician was
fulfilling the Will of the People and doing what America Really Wants.
But America sent the clearest possible signals that it didn’t want
amnesty. Such matters are not governed by popular referendum, but it’s
still striking that not a single poll can be produced showing majority support
for what Obama did last night, including some resistance from people who are
generally in favor of all that “pathway to citizenship” stuff but oppose the
way Obama is forcing it down their throats. The most recent election
could not have made it more clear that the American electorate doesn’t want
this. But Obama seized new powers to override the American people, acting
as the representative of foreign citizens.
Even with something like ObamaCare, there was political
spin about how some majority percentage of the public vaguely favored its
ostensible goals, but not this time. Obama is explicitly rejecting
Constitutional authority and the expressed will of the voters, in essence
declaring that the voters don’t matter, and elections don’t matter – he’s said
as much in recent days, declaring that he derives his authority from his
psychic connection to the people who didn’t bother to vote. It was always
a mistake for Americans to weaken the Constitutional restraints on government
power in the pursuit of popular objectives. The very purpose of such
restraints is to hold aspiring rulers at bay when they claim to be doing what
the public wants. We accepted the tyranny of the majority, and then we
submitted to the tyranny of politically active, well-connected minorities, and
now we face tyranny in the name of people who aren’t part of the American
electorate at all. By waxing rhapsodic about the glories of immigration
last night, the tyrant shamefully erased the distinction between legal and
illegal immigration, a breathtaking insult to those who did the hard work of
complying with American law… and he declared that this is no longer an issue
on which American citizens have any
say at all, no matter how many ballots they cast against his
will. The issue has been decided by your ruler, and you will now obey.
That argument should be unacceptable to a single
patriotic American, no matter what they think about the immigration issue
itself – the fact that you’ve been told you can’t even vote against these decrees
should completely transcend whatever you think about the policy itself.
Obama has posed a test to discover just how submissive America has
become. In the end, I think we’ll surprise him.
Update: Viewed from the standpoint of dispassionate
political strategy, the biggest problem for Obama is that his actions will draw
significant opposition from people who basically agree that illegal aliens
should be given amnesty, but are repulsed by the techniques Obama is using to
impose the policy. One such example comes from Ilya Shapiro at the Cato Institute, whose headline sums
it up: “Obama’s Executive Action is Good Policy, Bad Law, and Terrible
Precedent.” The post even begins with praising Obama’s speech as
“excellent,” but things go downhill for the Emperor with each succeeding
paragraph.
It wold be fair to
postulate that some number of people will be influenced in the opposite manner:
they aren’t all that crazy about handing out amnesty to illegal aliens, but
they approve of Obama’s power grab, or at least enjoy watching the outraged
reaction of his critics. There won’t be nearly as many people who see it
that way, and virtually all of them were already dead-end Obama supporters.
Granted that Obama wants the strife and divisiveness caused by his
actions, I nevertheless think he might have underestimated how many amnesty
supporters he’s losing by doing what they want, using means they cannot abide.
IT IS DONE: Obama Gives
Amnesty to 5 MILLION Illegals, Wants to Focus on ‘Felons, Not Families’
Not what America needed.
Spurning furious Republicans, President
Barack Obama unveiled expansive executive actions on immigration Thursday night
to spare nearly 5 million people in the U.S. illegally from deportation and
refocus enforcement efforts on “felons, not families.”
The moves, affecting mostly parents and young
people, marked the most sweeping changes to the nation’s fractured immigration
laws in nearly three decades and set off a fierce fight with Republicans over
the limits of presidential powers.
In a televised address to the nation, Obama
defended the legality of his actions and challenged GOP lawmakers to focus their
energy not on blocking his actions, but on approving long-stalled legislation
to take its place.
“To those members of Congress who question my
authority to make our immigration system work better, or question the wisdom of
me acting where Congress has failed, I have one answer: Pass a bill,” Obama
said, flexing his presidential powers just two weeks after his political
standing was challenged in the midterm elections.
As Obama addressed the nation from the White
House, immigration supporters with American flags draped over their shoulders
marched on the street outside carrying signs that read, “Gracias, Presidente
Obama.”
Despite Obama’s challenge to Republicans to
pass a broader immigration bill, his actions and the angry GOP response could
largely stamp out prospects for Congress passing comprehensive legislation
under the current administration, ensuring that the contentious debate will
carry on into the 2016 presidential campaign.
Republicans, emboldened by their sweeping
victories in the midterms, are weighing responses to the president’s actions
that include lawsuits, a government shutdown, and in rare instances, even
impeachment.
“The president will come to regret the
chapter history writes if he does move forward,” Sen. Mitch McConnell, the
Kentucky Republican who is soon to become the Senate majority leader, said
before Obama’s address.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, who has
refused to have his members vote on broad immigration legislation passed by the
Senate last year, said Obama’s decision to go it alone “cemented his legacy of
lawlessness and squandered what little credibility he had left.”
No
nos damos cuenta pero cuando aceptamos una condición como cierta realmente
estamos vendiendo nuestra alma al Diablo; y esto... !no sólo pasa con las
matemáticas!
UNA DOBLE ESCALA PARA
“MEDIR” EL UNIVERSO:
Hoy
día representa un misterio como se pudieron erigir las pirámides de Egipto.
Dicen que los antiguos no conocían casi nada de matemáticas pero todas las
evidencias sugieren algo muy distinto: realmente no pueden existir construcciones geométricas más perfectas. Sólo existe una posibilidad de poder
erigir un monumento como la Gran Pirámide de Keops que condense en sus
dimensiones no sólo una extrema perfección en sus relaciones geométricas sino
que además sea un reflejo a escala, tanto de la Tierra como quizás, de todo el
Universo. Si pudiera demostrarse que los Antiguos arquitectos utilizaron un
conocimiento físico y matemático similar, aunque mucho más avanzado que el
nuestro querría decir que realmente existió una civilización con un perfecto dominio tanto del espacio como del tiempo.
De
ser esto cierto quizás las pirámides contengan un mensaje visible a simple
vista: un mensaje geométrico escrito en todas y cada una de sus piedras. Como muchos autores sostienen lo que
los antiguos pretendieron era “La
cuadratura del círculo”. Según ellos sólo fue un intento, aunque como vamos
a ver desde otro punto de vista, las conclusiones pueden ser distintas.
En
el siglo XIX dimos un salto en el conocimiento matemático con la introducción
de diferentes tipos de geometría consistentes con el espacio-tiempo. En
términos generales podemos definirlas como geometrías esféricas o curvadas. El
nexo de unión entre la geometría euclidea que habitualmente estudiamos en el
colegio y la geometría esférica se puede condensar en el concepto de
“curvatura”, un concepto igual de fundamental en el mundo físico.
Su
aplicación práctica en la comprensión de los patrones que rigen el Universo no
se hizo esperar mucho. Gracias a ella Einstein pudo desarrollar la
teoría de la relatividad en
la que se introdujo una descripción del espacio-tiempo que, como cabía esperar,
lógicamente era curvado. Esto ha sido ampliamente demostrado.
Las
matemáticas o, más concretamente, el tipo de geometría en que se basan siempre
han ido por delante en el conocimiento profundo de los patrones que rigen el comportamiento del mundo “real” o natural. No es menos cierto que las matemáticas
dependen totalmente de los números en que se basan y que solemos ver estos
dispuestos solamente de forma lineal: es lo que conocemos como la métrica, la
escala decimal o la recta “real”.
Por
este motivo el nexo de unión entre estas diferentes variedades geométricas se
basa precisamente en el Teorema
de Pitágoras, que es el criterio que utilizamos para establecer si
trabajamos con una “estructura” plana o curvada. Es lógico que así sea ya que
comparamos ambos tipos de geometría con la única “herramienta” que disponemos
para hacerlo: una escala lineal, que nos permite “triangular”.
Cuando
definimos una función matemática lo que hacemos, en esencia, es otorgar a un
número (o varios) un valor diferente de acuerdo con dicha función. Ambos
valores, lógicamente, están vinculados por la propia definición. Ahora bien, a
ambos lados de la ecuación trabajamos con los mismos valores; en otras
palabras, todo lo que hagamos, matemáticamente hablando, está determinado (podemos
conjeturar) por lo que los propios números nos permiten
hacer.
Podríamos
pensar que esto es correcto si no fuera por un “pequeño” detalle; y es que,
realmente, no sabemos cómo los números se organizan entre ellos. Todo lo que
conocemos de los números lo sabemos a través de caminos indirectos, que son las
funciones que habitualmente utilizamos, pero desconocemos si existe un patrón oculto que
realmente determina su comportamiento o está en la base de todos los
resultados.
El
razonamiento es el siguiente: si los números siguen un patrón de comportamiento
(y esta es una de las “Conjeturas del Milenio”), este patrón será subyacente a
cualquier estructura matemática que “montemos” gracias a ellos. Si esto fuera
cierto cualquier concepto o construcción matemática que pensemos no sería
correcta si entrara en contradicción con dicho patrón. En otras palabras, su
existencia implicaría una correlación universal e intemporal independiente
incluso de nuestra civilización y de toda nuestra ciencia matemática, ya que no
podemos imaginar una forma diferente de contar que no sea de forma unitaria.
Sería cierto que únicamente descubrimos, como en la naturaleza, los patrones
ocultos y dado que estos pueden expresarse de forma matemática podría decirse,
incluso, que los números representan el Universo.
Física y matemática como sabemos son ciencias opuestas, pero absolutamente
complementarias.
En
matemáticas encontramos algunas anomalías, quizás la mayor de ellas sea la
existencia de los números denominados imaginarios. Estos números no existen
matemáticamente pero, curiosamente, son el mejor instrumento de que disponemos
para representar gráficamente las principales manifestaciones del
espacio-tiempo. No debemos subestimar su importancia porque una anomalía parecida,
pero en un plano físico (no conceptual), fue la que permitió a Max Planck descubrir la
mecánica cuántica, en un
tiempo en el que todos estaban convencidos de que nuestro conocimiento físico
ya estaba completado.
Trabajar
con una única herramienta ciertamente condiciona nuestra forma de entender la
realidad. Podemos expresar
nuestra escala decimal en un plano de coordenadas, simplemente duplicándola. De
esta manera tenemos unos ejes de coordenadas rectos que nos permiten describir
todo tipo de manifestaciones espacio-temporales en un plano. Nuevamente
podríamos decir que esto es correcto si no fuera por otro “pequeño” detalle
relevante y es que el espacio-tiempo, como descubrió Einstein,
también puede ser curvado, no sólo recto.
Tomemos
un ejemplo algo más práctico. Normalmente definimos el valor de pi como un punto más dentro de nuestra
escala decimal. Ya sabemos que este valor es muy especial, pues ha llegado a
ser asimilado incluso con “Dios”. Ahora bien, respecto de lo que nos interesa,
dicho valor puede representarse alternativamente tanto en una línea recta como
también de forma curva; pero… si solamente utilizamos nuestra “métrica” una
circunferencia no “cabe” en una línea recta.
Si
realmente pensamos que es cierto que todo lo que ocurre a nuestro alrededor
puede ser descrito de forma matemática realmente tiene poco sentido
“complicarnos” la vida con conceptos físicos. Si prescindimos de ellos
podríamos sustituir todas las magnitudes físicas de nuestras ecuaciones tan
sólo por una medida unitaria (el valor unidad, 1). La unidad, como dijo Planck,
es la unidad de medida más básica en nuestro Universo; cualquier manifestación
puede ser reducida a la misma. No sólo un “cuanto” de Planck sino, incluso, todo el movimiento del Universo, como
si de una “onda” o un “ciclo” se tratara.
Cualquier
función o estructura matemática es independiente de las unidades de medida y,
en el fondo lo que establece es una idéntica numérica que se da entre
dimensiones matemáticas. Un ejemplo de esto es la función que define el volumen
de una esfera: en función de un radio inicial (un número) determinamos su
equivalente a nivel tridimensional (otro número). Toda función matemática,
realmente vincula, conceptualmente, dimensiones diferentes.
Hoy
día intentamos unificar todas las leyes de la física bajo una única y exclusiva
formulación “físico”-matemática. La principal incoherencia es que intentamos
unificar un mundo físico descrito en función de determinadas magnitudes
físicas, con el mundo cuántico, donde el concepto físico de medición es
totalmente irrelevante. Si queremos unificar ambos mundos es lógico pensar que
el vehículo adecuado sea únicamente el matemático. En matemáticas no dependemos
de las unidades de medida, todo se basa en relaciones. Cuando adaptamos estas
al mundo físico lo único que hacemos es asignar magnitudes conocidas a los
símbolos matemáticos, aunque realmente estas sean irrelevantes. Su única
utilidad se deriva de la necesidad de establecer comparaciones que nos son
habituales. Pero, realmente, también podríamos comparar sin utilizar unidades
de medida: todo depende del contexto o del punto de
vista. Todo es relativo.
Si
las matemáticas son el vehículo adecuado hemos de centrar nuestra atención en
estas. Y, sobretodo, darnos cuenta de que si queremos alcanzar una descripción
total del Universo quizás necesitamos no sólo una escala matemática, sino de dos escalas entrelazadas entre ellas, como si de una partícula y
una onda se tratara.
Ahora
vamos sobre ellas. Antes piensa que vamos a hablar de dos escalas opuestas
entre ellas pero, a su vez, complementarias. La 1ª está hecha con los números
naturales, la 2ª con sus opuestos. Todo lo opuesto, como el frío y el calor, en
el fondo es complementario.
Precisamente
este es el comportamiento que encontramos en el “medio” físico donde todo se basa en los opuestos: los efectos electromagnéticos,
la gravedad o la relatividad (dualidad masa-energía) son un buen ejemplo. En
cambio las matemáticas justamente no nos permiten hacer esto.
Una
precisa fundamental en matemáticas es que una solución no puede ser igual a su
opuesta; en función de este criterio nos basamos para dar validez a las
demostraciones. Es el criterio que se conoce como “reducción al absurdo” pero…
¿Qué pasaría si lo absurdo fuera lo correcto? Al fin y al cabo, el Universo parece tener un comportamiento totalmente paradójico. ¿No es cierto?
Vamos
a abrir una brecha que ya está un tanto abierta. No siempre es cierto que una
solución no pueda ser igual a su opuesta. Un ejemplo de esto son las elevaciones
al cuadrado. Dos soluciones opuestas son equivalentes,
aunque sea en una dimensión superior. El
propio Teorema de Pitágoras también es un ejemplo de esto: dos
líneas rectas opuestas formando un ángulo recto a 90º son iguales a una
tercera, pero sólo cuando elevamos al cuadrado.
De
esta incoherencia surgieron los números imaginarios, gracias a ellos una
solución puede ser igual a su opuesta, pero claro, viendo esto siempre en un
plano, no en una línea recta.
La
mayor parte de las incoherencias matemáticas surgen precisamente cuando
elevamos al cuadrado. Gracias a esta función podemos demostrar incluso
resultados a priori “absurdos”. Lo más importante es que una solución y su
opuesta pueden ser vistas como complementarias, de la misma manera que un número
imaginario se compone de la misma manera: dos puntos situados en lados opuestos
del plano. Bajo este contexto, como dijo Gödel, un matemático, siempre existirán soluciones que sean correctas pero que estén fuera del
sistema. Matemáticamente
nos referimos a ellas como soluciones absurdas o imaginarias, simplemente por
el hecho de que la probabilidad de que sean ciertas es extremadamente pequeña;
tanto o más que la probabilidad de encontrar un valor que pueda definir una
circunferencia perfecta. No es casualidad que todas nuestras leyes físicas
relevantes se basen también en los cuadrados y en
manifestaciones espacio-temporales opuestas. Todas ellas pueden ser vistas de forma
geométrica.
Seguramente
nunca habrás oído hablar de ella, pero hace miles de años ya utilizaron una
doble escala en las construcciones que llevaron a cabo. Como habrás adivinado
me estoy refiriendo al Antiguo Egipto. En estas pirámides milenarias podemos
observar que, misteriosamente se utilizaron dos escalas. La primera de ellas es el codo real,
también llamado “codo egipcio” y la segunda, y aquí también reside el misterio,
fue el metro: una unidad de medida que tan sólo podemos referenciar hoy día a
la velocidad de la luz: la única referencia en nuestro Universo. Tampoco es
casual que estas civilizaciones adoraran la Luz que el Sol representa.
Una parte del misterio lo podemos intentar
comprenderlo ahora. Los “constructores” querían desviar nuestra atención no al
metro, sino simplemente al concepto “unidad” para verlo simplemente de forma
matemática, sin ninguna unidad de medida complementaria. Cuando hacemos esto
nos damos cuenta de que, por ejemplo, la Gran Pirámide de Keops representa la
Unidad, pues todas sus dimensiones están referenciadas a los valores áureos que, a su vez, se basan en la misma.
Es indiferente hablar del diámetro unidad o del arco de una circunferencia, por
ejemplo.
Esta
equivalencia la observamos en todas sus dimensiones interiores. La Gran
Pirámide se construyó utilizando tanto los números naturales en la que, por supuesto, la unidad es su representante, como en base al codo egipcio que, a su vez, sintetiza una escala formada
por valores áureos. Tampoco
es casualidad que dichos valores muestren sus correspondencias con los números
naturales precisamente cuando “elevamos al cuadrado”. Las dos escalas están
relacionadas pero en dimensiones diferentes, de la misma manera que encontramos
este tipo de relaciones con los números naturales. Los números imaginarios son
el nexo de conexión, siempre que sustituyamos estos por la “divina proporción”
(una solución que, cuando hacemos su raíz cuadrada es igual a su opuesta).Todo puede ser considerado igual o diferente
dependiendo del punto de vista, de
la misma manera que podemos imaginar que una circunferencia no es más que un
cuadrado “girando”. Esta perspectiva desde diferentes puntos de vista es
incompatible con la utilización de una simple escala, y más si se trata de una
escala lineal. Las matemáticas, como están planteadas, no te permiten otro
punto de vista, metafóricamente no te dejan “elevar” el lápiz del papel y
pensar de forma diferente. Algo no puede quedar demostrado si no es bajo su
peculiar criterio.
Pongamos
un ejemplo. La escala decimal no sólo se puede representar de forma lineal,
también podemos pensar en ella como si de una “escalera” realmente se tratara.
Simplemente sustituye el “cero” como indicador de posición (así es como
actualmente lo usamos) por un “escalón”. Esta perspectiva diferente no
distorsiona la concepción de escala decimal, dado que la misma, como la
geometría, se comporta de forma fractal. Simplemente indicamos el cambio de
posición en “vertical” en lugar de “horizontal”, pero la esencia no cambia. Si hacemos un esfuerzo incluso podemos
contemplar la misma como si de una circunferencia se tratara: simplemente piensa que cada escalón de
la misma, por pequeño que sea, siempre se compone de 10 escalones más pequeños.
Si resulta complicado lo podemos ver de forma lineal: dado que toda nuestra
escala decimal se puede representar de forma binaria, como si de 0s y 1s se
tratara piensa en ella como si fuera el arco de una circunferencia, dando una
gran vuelta. Si lo expresáramos en términos físicos diríamos que el tiempo también puede ser cíclico, no sólo lineal. ¿Puedes imaginar las consecuencias?
Si
juntamos dos escalas como estas no necesitamos sólo una línea recta, también
necesitamos un compás y un ángulo recto. Pero, aparte de esto, no necesitamos
nada más. Lo que hoy día entendemos como relatividad y gravedad los antiguos lo
veían como si de formas geométricas se tratarán. Este es el motivo de que el
faraón venga siempre representado con dos atributos en sus manos: ambos son la síntesis de todo el conocimiento del Universo. Verdaderamente la civilización que
construyeron las pirámides fueron dueños del espacio y el tiempo,
los que los siguieron simplemente seguían este conocimiento.
Dicen
que una teoría unificadora es complicada, simplemente por el hecho de que
intentamos unificar conceptos, en apariencia, totalmente diferentes. La base de la teoría áurea es que no hagamos esto, que simplemente veamos
ambos como complementarios: como
la esfera y el cuadrado. También, ¡claro! adaptando geométricamente todos los
conceptos matemáticos que no tienen una exacta correspondencia con el Universo
que observamos.
Fueron
los griegos los que, literalmente, “extrajeron” los números reales de la
geometría para poder operar con ellos y proporcionarnos todos esos maravillosos
teoremas matemáticos que aún hoy día, nos resultan imprescindibles. Lo que
estamos haciendo es el camino inverso: devolvemos a los números naturales al
lugar al que pertenecen. Bajo este concepto, tal y como los antiguos creyeron los números realmente son el
Universo.
La
base de la Teoría Áurea se basa en no imponer ninguna condición de partida. Al hacer esto hacemos que las matemáticas sean relativas. Pero, al fin y al cabo, así es como el Universo se presenta.
No nos damos cuenta
pero cuando aceptamos una condición como cierta realmente estamos vendiendo
nuestra alma al Diablo; Y esto... !no sólo pasa con las matemáticas!
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
“En mi opinión”
No 801 Noviembre 22, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro
R González Miño EDITOR
No comments:
Post a Comment