No 792
“En
mi opinión”
Noviembre 11, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
“Saludos a los Veteranos en su día. Gloria a
los héroes bravos americanos que han servido y sirven en las Fuerzas Armadas de
los Estados Unidos. Gloria a nuestros héroes”
¿25 veteranos se suicidan diariamente en los
Estados Unidos? ¿Por qué? ¿No reciben
apoyo del gobierno que los envio a la guerra? ¿Tendra algo que ver con el pésimo
servicio que ha estado dándoles Los Hospitales para veteranos? 25 veteranos
sicuidandose diariamente es mas que las bajas de una guerra…
“EMO” Quién fue el engendro diabólico y
abusivo que creo La Autoridad de carreteras que ha puesto ilegalmente todos esos “TOLLS” que le están acabando con
la vida de los Ciudadanos, que les está robando una gran parte de sus salarios.
Eso es un descaro y un abuso, e ilegal porque ya usted paga un impuesto en la
gasolina y cuando paga la chapa del carro. Es ilegal que les estén cobrando
tres veces. Todos a protestar contra estos abusos de los politicastros del
Condado Miami Dade. En cualquier momento les ponen un tol para sentarse en su
propia tasa del inodoro de su casa. “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA” “PROTESTA”
Lázaro R González Miño.
Is The Man In The White House Mentally Ill? President
Obama is a sick, dangerous man.
I
am not asking this with my tongue in my cheek. I am as serious as a judge. As I
sit here and write, I am listening to Mr. Obama’s press conference. Something
is very wrong with this guy. He is either mentally ill or
demon-possessed. Either is a possibility. But something is definitely
wrong with him. He seems somehow inhuman.
I’ve
lived my entire life in a world of athletic competition. I understand the
human emotion that is associated with winning and losing. I grew up with
the opening theme of ABC’s Wide World of Sports continuously playing in my head.
(If I close my eyes, I can hear the voice of Jim McKay bouncing around
the corners of my brain.)
“Spanning
the globe to bring you the constant variety of sports… the thrill of victory…
and the agony of defeat… the human drama of athletic competition… This is
“ABC’s Wide World of Sports!”
The
thrill of victory and the agony of defeat brings with it emotions. That is why
we watch sports. We love the human drama of athletic competition. That’s why we
have press conferences after games. We love to hear the emotional
reaction to winning and losing.
President
Obama is a hollow man. He has no feelings. He feels no emotions. The
human drama of competition seems to have no outward effect on him.
Can
I be blunt? He got his butt kicked. Every talking head on the tube is pointing
the finger at his unpopularity. “The bloom is off of the rose.
It is a direct repudiation of his policies. The era of Obama is
over.” It is as if everyone knows it but him.
Politics
is nothing more than a beauty contest, and Obama has been voted off of the
island. But he acts as if he still owns the island. There seems to be no agony
in his defeat. It is not normal. His emotions do not line up with reality. He
is either sick, or he is possessed. I’m not laughing. I am serious.
His
party rejected him. The American people rejected him. His fawning media has
turned their affections in a different direction; yet he shows no emotion. I
watch him on the TV. I watch him in his press conference. I watch his eyes as
he responds to the media’s questions. I believe he is a sick, dangerous man.
I
Googled the word ‘sociopath’. Here’s what I found: “A person with a psychopathic
personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense
of moral responsibility or social conscience.”
Bingo.
That’s him. That’s the guy living the life of President of the United States.
I
went a bit further and Googled “Characteristics of a Sociopath.” Read it for yourself. Permit me to summarize. You will
recognize his mental illness by these traits:
-An
oversized ego.
-Lying
and showing manipulative behavior.
-Incapable
of showing empathy.
-No
lack of shame or remorse.
-Staying
eerily calm in dangerous situations.
-Behaving
irresponsibly or with extreme impulsivity.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/man-white-house-mentally-ill/#bJPrF1j296FdkAY0.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/man-white-house-mentally-ill/#bJPrF1j296FdkAY0.99
Amenper: Obamacare
Architect: Yeah, We Lied to The "Stupid" American People to Get It
Passed
Katie Pavlich
|
Meet Jonathan Gruber, a professor at MIT and an architect of
Obamacare. During a panel event last year about how the legislation passed,
turning over a sixth of the U.S. economy to the government, Gruber admitted
that the Obama administration went through "tortuous" measures to
keep the facts about the legislation from the American people, including
covering up the redistribution of wealth from the healthy to the sick in the
legislation that Obamacare is in fact a tax. The video of his comments just
recently surfaced ahead of the second open enrollment period for Obamacare at
Healthcare.gov."You can't do it political, you just literally cannot do
it. Transparent financing and also transparent spending. I mean, this bill was
written in a tortured way to make sure CBO did not score the mandate as taxes.
If CBO scored the mandate as taxes the bill dies. Okay? So it’s written to do
that," Gruber said. "In terms of risk rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that
healthy people are going to pay in, you made explicit healthy people pay in and
sick people get money, it would not have passed. Lack of transparency is a huge
political advantage. And basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter
or whatever, but basically that was really really critical to get for the thing
to pass. Look, I wish Mark was right that we could make it all
transparent, but I’d rather have this law than not."
A few points. 1. Notice how lying to the American people is completely
justified by Obama administration standards so long as the ends justify the
means. Gruber would "rather have this law than not," and therefore
purposely lying about what the law actually is in order to get it passed is
completely acceptable. regardless of the negative effects it has on the lives
of Americans. 2. Lack of transparency might be a huge political advantage in
the short term, but long term there are consequences from voters, which is
exactly what we saw last week during the Democrat blood bath at every level of
government across the country. 3. Insulting Americans as stupid and deceiving
them is a really good way to lose your power on Capitol Hill, which is again
exactly what we saw last week in the 2014 midterms. Twenty-eight Senators who
voted for Obamacare are now out of the Senate for one reason or another. 4.
Obamacare in its entirely was "sold" on lies. From the promise to
keep your doctor to claims insurance rates would go down, not up -- to hiding
that the legislation was in fact a tax until of course it was necessary to
argue it was a tax to save the legislation at the Supreme Court. Government
bureaucrats promising an expansion of care knowing care under Obamacare would
be limited, etc. Hell, even the official name for Obamacare, "The
Affordable Care Act," is a lie. Obamacare isn't affordable. 5. The process
through which Obamacare was shoved through and down the throats of the American
people happened as a result of Harry Reid changing Senate rules and without the
support of voters. The legislation didn't receive a single Republican vote in
the House or the Senate. Also, remember this?
Or this?
"Absolutely not a tax increase."
|
er:
Amenper:
Hablando en Chino
BEIJING
—Con su influencia en la Casa Blanca, rápidamente deteriorándose, el
presidente
Barack
Hussein Obama está mirando a China, la parada de una gira por tres países es
para
tratar de hacer ver ante el mundo que
él tiene capacidad para
desempeñar un papel
dominante
en el escenario mundial durante sus últimos dos años de su administración-
Una vez
considerado como una superestrella mundial, Obama llegó el lunes en Pekín
bajo
circunstancias muy diferentes, con sus días
más poderosos evidentemente llegados a su fin.
En casa,
los republicanos siguen regocijados de
haber golpeado partido político de Obama
en las elecciones legislativas, relegando a
los demócratas a la minoría en ambas cámaras
legislativas.
Sus
homólogos en Asia sin lugar a dudas lo han notado y están posicionados para
tomar
ventajas de un atribulado Barack Obama que
va a enfrentarse con un seguro de Xi Jinping
A su
llegada a la capital China, Obama caminó del Air Force One y sobre una
alfombra roja,
con una guardia de docenas de soldados
chinos alineados en su camino a una limusina
que lo esperaba.
Más bien
parecía que estaba siendo tomado prisionero que recibido como un dignatario.
Lo
primero que hizo fue ir a una reunión con Presidente Joko Widodo de
Indonesia,
donde Obama vivió de joven.
Widodo,
quien juró su cargo el mes pasado en medio de una victoria izquierdista con
la promesa de un gobierno socialista, dijo
que su elección demuestra que el Islam y
el
socialismo pueden ir juntos y se comprometió a seguir luchando por el
extremismo
islámico
y socialista en su país.
Obama fue
efusivo, en su reunión con Widodos, llamando a su elección una
"afirmación
de la transición completa de que Indonesia
ha hecho a una próspera democracia y un
modelo para
la clase de tolerancia y pluralismo que queremos que todo el mundo".
¿Qué quiso decir, que quiere ese tipo de
gobierno para Estados Unidos?
Obama
sugirió que Widodo incluso podría visitar a Washington el año que viene.
Para
revivir una fase de su juventud, Obama se dirigió a los periodistas allí
reunidos en
Bahasa, la
lengua oficial de Indonesia.
Más tarde,
Obama fue a dar un discurso el lunes sobre lazos de Estados Unidos y China
en una cumbre de cooperación económica al
más alto nivel-
El viaje
marca una de las oportunidades finales de Obama para tratar de cumplir
un
objetivo de
ampliar la influencia estadounidense en Asia.
"Esto
va a ser un viaje difícil para el Presidente," dijo Ernest Bower, un
experto de Asia
en el
centro para estudios estratégicos e internacionales en Washington. Dijo que
los
líderes asiáticos estaban viendo el viaje de
Obama con una pregunta clave en mente:
¿Quién es
este Barack Obama después de las elecciones legislativas?
"¿Podrá
ser capaz de discernir si tiene un compromiso a seguir? y ¿podrá ahora tener
el poder político para cumplirlo?,"
dijo Bower.
En casa los
empresarios simplemente quieren que se pueda contrarrestar la creciente
influencia de China en el mercado de Estados
Unidos.
La misión
de Obama se encuentra
empañada con la débil posición contra el grupo estado
islámico y la respuesta de Ebola de su
gobierno hechos que han desviado recursos de
Estados Unidos militares y financieros en
otros lugares sin obtener resultados.
"El
Presidente sigue profundamente comprometido con China y su plan y su
implementación seguirá siendo una prioridad
durante el segundo mandato,"
dijo la
asesora de seguridad nacional de Obama, Susan Rice.
Obama está
sumergido en problemas causados por su administración ahora,
durante sus
dos últimos años en la oficina, cuando el foco en la próxima carrera
presidencial
agota la energía de sus propios esfuerzos nacionales.
A raíz de
las elecciones de la semana pasada, algunos de
los funcionarios de
casa blanca
aparentemente se mostraron optimistas sobre las perspectivas de
Obama para el comercio que gestiona en China
y otros lugares a pesar de que
ahora los republicanos se establecen
para controlar el Congreso y el Senado en Enero.
Pero otras
naciones y sobre todo domésticamente, todos están cautelosas con
respecto a
la capacidad de Obama para empujar un eventual acuerdo en el Congreso,
donde los demócratas han sido
extremandamente sensibles a las preocupaciones
de los
sindicatos.
Los
republicanos están en una posición de poder, las perspectivas de Obama son
tan
complejas y débiles como han sido sus seis años en su administración, sin
lugar
a dudas en una posición de minoría en las
cámaras legislativas, no pueden mejorar,
así que un argumento diferente no tiene validez ni substancia.
Los
republicanos tienden a apoyar los acuerdos de comercio como una manera de
impulsar la economía de Estados Unidos, y
los líderes del partido Republicano han
hablado positivamente de algún tipo de
acuerdo, pero han declarado en diferentes
ocasiones que cualquier acuerdo se sometería a una votación de arriba o
abajo,
evitando
las enmiendas de último minuto que podrían cambiar el tono del asunto.
Además,
los líderes chinos han visto enfoque de los Estados Unidos en Asia con
suspicacia,
temiendo un intento de contener el crecimiento de China e influencia
en la
región.
En una
muestra del clima político que enfrenta Obama en China, y el poco respeto
que los chinos le tienen, son los
comentarios en los medios de comunicación estatales
que han sido burlarse de él en los días
antes de su visita.
"Obama
siempre dice 'Sí,' para complacer las expectativas
que tienen de él, la gente"
lee un editorial en el idioma inglés del
Global Times. "Pero ha hecho un trabajo insulso,
ofreciendo casi nada a sus partidarios. La sociedad estadounidense se
ha cansado de
su banalidad". (Hasta los chinos lo han notado).
“En sus
reuniones con Xi, Obama también planea abordar cuestiones de derechos
humanos,
dijeron las autoridades, incluyendo el tratamiento de los periodistas, así
como las
protestas pro-democracia en Hong Kong que estalló en septiembre para
consternación de las autoridades chinas. El cambio climático — una preocupación
clave en Beijing lleno de smog — y el comportamiento agresivo de China hacia
sus vecinos también están en la agenda de Obama”
Esta
agenda para salvar cara, será recibida con el mismo humor y falta de respeto
que
tuvieron las agencias de noticias de la prensa controlada de Beijing.
En otras
palabras, el presidente de los Estados Unidos es tratado y considerado
como un
payaso, pero cuando se trata de Obama, no podemos ofendernos, no se
trata de la
nación, se trata que tengamos a un payaso de presidente.
Esto es un
hecho evidente no importa cómo se diga, en Español, en inglés y hasta
hablando en
Chino.
|
Bienvenida la mosca
Amenper: "Nature &
Nurture"and the Cuban Phenomenon
The popular discussion about nature and nurture relates to the relative importance of an individual's innate
qualities ("nature" in the sense of nativism or innatism) as
compared to an individual's personal experiences ("nurture" in the
sense of empiricism or behaviorism) in causing individual differences
in physical and behavioral traits.
Until some years ago, I was and advocate of nurture, I believed only
in the environment and culture influence in the individual
character. But watching some cases in persons close to me, in relation to
adopted children, I somewhat have changed my perception. I think
that the genetic tracks and genes, also have to do with the
character of the individual. But I still think that the nurture, the
culture in which the individual is raised, has a lot to do with what the
individual becomes in his or her adult life.
I have to accept this as a fact, especially when we notice how many Cubans
have raised from a minority among minorities, to important positions in
the public life, scientific and economic establishment.
When my first grandson celebrated his marriage in Chicago,
Illinois last August, I was surprised when I noticed how small the
Cuban community was, compared with the number of other sub ethnic Hispanic
residents of Illinois. But I also noticed that these few Cubans have
prominent positions in the state. I met people like Eliot
Montenegro, owner of Genesis, the larger home Healthcare institution in the
state, I met Ivan Fernandez, owner of one of the most
important Food and Pharmaceutical company in the state, I
learned of several prominent citizens of Cuban origin that had raised to
prominent positions in the state. Among those Cubans there was
a woman, Evelyn Sanguinetti.
Last Tuesday, "a day that will live in glory",
the citizens of Illinois elected Evelyn the first ever
Hispanic Lieutenant Governor of Illinois.,
Losing
The Senate Is The Least Of Harry Reid’s Worries After What Just Happened In
Nevada
"...has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy."
Last
week’s election might signal the beginning of the end for Harry Reid.
While
Nevada Republican Governor Brian Sandoval was re-elected in a landslide last
week, his pick for Lieutenant Governor, Mark Hutchison, was also elected, defeating Democrat Lucy Flores 59 to 33 percent.
The Governor and Lieutenant Governor run separately in the Silver State.
Flores
has been described as Reid’s “hand-picked candidate for lieutenant
governor” by the Las Vegas Review Journal.
What
this means for Nevada is that Sandoval, a former federal judge, has been given the green light to
challenge the outgoing Senate Majority Leader for his seat, which is up in two
years. Defeating Reid would assure that Nevada’s governor’s mansion would stay
in Republican control through 2018; and Hutchison did not rule out a run for
the top job four years from now, according to the Reno Gazette-Journal:
“That’s
a long way away and I am going to just to just do the very best I can to be
lieutenant governor and work as hard as I can for the people of Nevada.”
In
March, Jon Ralston wrote for Politico that Sandoval, a governor who has high
approval ratings, would be the “anti-Harry Reid if he chose to run for Senate”:
“Which
is why the prospect of Sandoval facing off against the occasionally dyspeptic,
sharply partisan and manifestly unpopular Senate majority leader in the 2016
U.S. Senate race has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”
Although
The New York Daily News reported Wednesday that Reid does not expect to
seek re-election in 2016, veteran Nevada GOP strategist Jim Denton told Western
Journalism he disagrees with that assessment:
“There
was a great deal of speculation that he would not run in 2010, too. I expect
that Senator Reid will seek re-election just as I expected him to in 2010.
Nothing in conversations I have had with him would lead me to believe
otherwise.”
Still,
Sandoval is no stranger to the Reid family, defeating son Rory to win his first
term in 2010. Reid recommended Sandoval to the
U.S. District Court in Nevada in 2004, and he was confirmed in 2005.
Mark
Peplowski, professor of Political Science at the College of Southern Nevada,
acknowledges that even though Republicans are a “poorly organized party” in the
Silver State, it would take something big to bring down the popular governor.
“The
only thing that would seriously hurt Sandoval’s bid would be if: he screwed up
[or] if a very strong woman candidate steps forward as a Democrat and runs
along with Hillary. [That] could muster some moderate movement to the left.
Peplowski
continued:
“Sandoval
is not undefeatable, but it will take a major policy flub, [a] meltdown or
second coming of FDR to slow down his momentum.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#rA6X8WY7eMoUhuq0.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#rA6X8WY7eMoUhuq0.99
Losing
The Senate Is The Least Of Harry Reid’s Worries After What Just Happened In
Nevada
"...has
some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy."
Last week’s election might signal the
beginning of the end for Harry Reid.
While Nevada Republican Governor Brian
Sandoval was re-elected in a landslide last week, his pick for Lieutenant
Governor, Mark Hutchison, was also elected, defeating Democrat
Lucy Flores 59 to 33 percent. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor run
separately in the Silver State.
Flores has been described as Reid’s
“hand-picked candidate for lieutenant governor” by
the Las
Vegas Review Journal.
What this means for Nevada is that
Sandoval, a former
federal judge, has been given the green light to
challenge the outgoing Senate Majority Leader for his seat, which is up in two
years. Defeating Reid would assure that Nevada’s governor’s mansion would stay
in Republican control through 2018; and Hutchison did not rule out a run for
the top job four years from now, according
to the
Reno Gazette-Journal:
“That’s a
long way away and I am going to just to just do the very best I can to be
lieutenant governor and work as hard as I can for the people of Nevada.”
In March, Jon Ralston wrote
for Politico that
Sandoval, a governor who has high approval ratings, would be the “anti-Harry
Reid if he chose to run for Senate”:
“Which is why
the prospect of Sandoval facing off against the occasionally dyspeptic, sharply
partisan and manifestly unpopular Senate majority leader in the 2016 U.S.
Senate race has some Republicans writing Reid’s political eulogy.”
Although The New York Daily News reported Wednesday
that Reid does not expect to seek re-election in 2016, veteran Nevada GOP
strategist Jim Denton told Western Journalism he disagrees with that
assessment:
“There was a
great deal of speculation that he would not run in 2010, too. I expect that
Senator Reid will seek re-election just as I expected him to in 2010. Nothing
in conversations I have had with him would lead me to believe otherwise.”
Still, Sandoval is no stranger to the
Reid family, defeating son Rory to win his first term in 2010.
Reid recommended Sandoval to the U.S. District Court in Nevada in 2004, and he
was confirmed in 2005.
Mark Peplowski, professor of Political
Science at the College of Southern Nevada, acknowledges that even though Republicans
are a “poorly organized party” in the Silver State, it would take something big
to bring down the popular governor.
“The only
thing that would seriously hurt Sandoval’s bid would be if: he screwed up [or]
if a very strong woman candidate steps forward as a Democrat and runs along
with Hillary. [That] could muster some moderate movement to the left.
Peplowski continued:
“Sandoval is
not undefeatable, but it will take a major policy flub, [a] meltdown or second
coming of FDR to slow down his momentum.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#YW0VVzwzoF0sFImd.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republican-victory-nevada-last-week-mean-end-harry-reid-2016/#YW0VVzwzoF0sFImd.99
Is Obama Looking to Burn Down the House?
President Obama is a sore loser. He
lost big on election-day 2014, even though he has said that it was not a
rejection of his policies.
Everybody but those in the Democrat
leadership and media sycophants knows better.
Obama, however, being the sore loser
and narcissist that he is, will not stop with his unconstitutional and damaging
policies.
He will use what’s left of his
presidency to push through his agenda. The most dangerous period is the time before
the new Congress is sworn in.
Obama would rather “burn down the
house” than follow the will of the people and the Constitution. He’s never had
neither the nation nor the American people in view. He’s only had himself. Even
the Democrat Party is of no concern to him. There’s a good chance that he is a
self-realized Manchurian Candidate. He has it in for America.
Watch
out you might get what you're after
Cool babies strange but not a stranger
I'm an ordinary guy
Burning down the house
Cool babies strange but not a stranger
I'm an ordinary guy
Burning down the house
Hold tight wait till the party's over
Hold tight we're in for nasty weather
There has got to be a way
Burning down the house.
Hold tight we're in for nasty weather
There has got to be a way
Burning down the house.
200 Years Ago: Burning of the White
House (1814)
He will move ahead in the destruction
of the coal industry. He’s lost West Virginia to the Republicans. The state is
no use to him.
He fought energy independence. The
Keystone Pipeline is a no-brainer, and yet he opposed it at every turn.
Obama will go ahead with amnesty. This
is the best way to dilute America’s founding principles. La Raza – “The Race” –
will supplant what made America the envy of the world.
“President Obama repeated Sunday that
he intends to change U.S. immigration law through executive action, over
Republican leaders’ repeated requests to wait and dire warnings about the
consequences of sidestepping Congress.
“‘I’m going to do what I need to do,’
Obama told CBS’ ‘Face the Nation,’ in an interview taped on Friday.”
If burning down the house is the
objective, objections have no relevance.
This is not to denigrate all
immigrants, but our existing welfare system, created by unconstitutionalists
from both political parties, will turn the United States into a breeding ground
for government dependency. America will become another socialist State. “A
record 20% of American households, one in five, were on food stamps in 2013,
according to data from the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA).” That’s more than 23 million households.
“In the past five years alone, the
number of households on food stamps has greatly increased. In fiscal year 2009
– Oct. 1, 2008 through Sept. 30, 2009 – the number of households on food stamps
was 15,232,115. Five years later, in 2013, that amount had increased by 51.3%
to reach 23,052,388 households.”
I suspect that even Democrats are
dismayed at the direction President ObamaEric Holder, has taken. His
radical agenda has sullied the Democrat Party. They now realize that he never
had the Party’s long-term future in mind.
Obama has a vendetta against America.
“In a speech given at Long Beach
earlier this year, President Obama’s new nominee for Attorney General, Loretta
Lynch, specifically called out voter ID laws as racist and schools as disproportionately using zero tolerance policies
against minorities.”
Voter ID laws apply to everybody
equally. If everybody is required to show an ID before voting, like every
person has to show an ID at a bank or to get on an airplane, then how is that
those who are voting to put people in power don’t have to show an ID? This
makes no sense unless there is a political agenda in view.
Don’t think this latest election
changes everything. Not only do we have to deal with the lame duck Congress,
executive action by the President, but a Republican Party in transition.
We need to stay engaged. One battle
does not mean the war has been won.
Update: we've just learned that President
Obama is going to pursue "Net Neutrality," which in government terms
means regulation of the Internet to force equality. Once the government gets
its hands on something, its grip will be on everything.
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/18358/obama-looking-burn-house/#IUr0ZkUTmc8buR0F.99
Read more at http://godfatherpolitics.com/18358/obama-looking-burn-house/#IUr0ZkUTmc8buR0F.99
Border Patrol: Obama Amnesty Talk Fuels Illegal Immigration
President Barack Obama's insistence that he will sign an executive order
that will allow as many as 6 million illegal immigrants to stay in the country
will only create a new surge of illegal migrants across the U.S. border, says
the National Border Patrol.
"We definitely see increases in illegal aliens coming across the border when there is national talk of an amnesty," Shawn Moran of the National Border Patrol Council told Newsradio 1200 WOAI.
"We definitely see increases in illegal aliens coming across the border when there is national talk of an amnesty," Shawn Moran of the National Border Patrol Council told Newsradio 1200 WOAI.
He said that Mexican and Latin American smuggling cartels seize on
messages from the administration to recruit people who may be desperate to
escape poverty and violent crime in their own countries.
"Under President Bush there was talk of immigration reform, and they would say, 'we're coming here for the amnesty,'" Moran said, adding that changes in the administration's immigration policy will create a new surge.
Moran used as an example the recent influx of minors from Central America.
"That was largely fueled by the idea that we were not enforcing our immigration laws, and if you got to this country, you could stay here," he said, according to WOAI.
President Barack Obama told congressional leaders at a meeting on Friday that he intended to take executive action on immigration even though he had been warned against the move by the GOP in the aftermath of their electoral victories.
"Under President Bush there was talk of immigration reform, and they would say, 'we're coming here for the amnesty,'" Moran said, adding that changes in the administration's immigration policy will create a new surge.
Moran used as an example the recent influx of minors from Central America.
"That was largely fueled by the idea that we were not enforcing our immigration laws, and if you got to this country, you could stay here," he said, according to WOAI.
President Barack Obama told congressional leaders at a meeting on Friday that he intended to take executive action on immigration even though he had been warned against the move by the GOP in the aftermath of their electoral victories.
Before the announcement, House Speaker John Boehner said the president
would"poison the well" if he changes immigration policy without waiting for
Congress to act, and incoming Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said
executive action on immigration would be like "waving a red flag in front
of a bull."
On Sunday, Obama defended his decision to act and said he was not trying to circumvent Congress, but that he had waited long enough for it to take action.
"The minute they pass a bill that addresses the problems with immigration reform, I will sign it and it supersedes whatever actions I take," Obama said on CBS' "Face the Nation."
"And I'm encouraging them to do so . . . on parallel track we're going to be implementing an executive action.
"But if in fact a bill gets passed, nobody's going to be happier than me to sign it, because that means it will be permanent rather than temporary."
Just days before the election, the chairman of the Republican National Committee,Reince Priebus
On Sunday, Obama defended his decision to act and said he was not trying to circumvent Congress, but that he had waited long enough for it to take action.
"The minute they pass a bill that addresses the problems with immigration reform, I will sign it and it supersedes whatever actions I take," Obama said on CBS' "Face the Nation."
"And I'm encouraging them to do so . . . on parallel track we're going to be implementing an executive action.
"But if in fact a bill gets passed, nobody's going to be happier than me to sign it, because that means it will be permanent rather than temporary."
Just days before the election, the chairman of the Republican National Committee,Reince Priebus
, promised that if the GOP won control of the Senate the party would do
"everything we can do to stop" executive amnesty for illegal
immigrants.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/Amnesty-Illegal-Immigration-Executive-action/2014/11/10/id/606442/#ixzz3IlhdYcQ7
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
President Obama to FCC: Reclassify Broadband Service as Title II
to Protect Net Neutrality
President Obama is urging the FCC to reclassify consumer broadband
service -- to open it to broader government oversight and regulation -- with
the goal of protecting the net neutrality principles that his administration
has long supported.
In
a lengthy statement that also included a video, Obama asserted "there is
no higher calling than protecting an open, accessible and free Internet."
He urged the FCC to reclassify broadband service as a Title II
telecommunications service but with caveats that would shield it from some
aspects of regulation for such services.
"The
time has come for the FCC to recognize that broadband service is of the same
importance and must carry the same obligations as so many of the other vital
services do. To do that, I believe the FCC should reclassify consumer broadband
service under Title II of the Telecommunications Act -- while at the same time
forbearing from rate regulation and other provisions less relevant to broadband
services. This is a basic acknowledgment of the services ISPs provide to American
homes and businesses, and the straightforward obligations necessary to ensure
the network works for everyone -- not just one or two companies," Obama
said in a statement.
Story continues below.
Story continues below.
FCC
chairman Tom Wheeler has previously said the agency would consider
reclassifying broadband under Title II -- a move staunchly opposed by Comcast,
AT&T, Verizon and other Internet service providers as an unnecessary step
that would impose undue burdens and decrease investment in high-speed networks.
ISPs
oppose the reclassification of broadband under Title II, because it would give
the FCC leeway to impose price regulations, conditions on wholesale access and
other controls.
In
response to Obama's statement Monday, Verizon said Title II would "apply
1930's-era utility regulation to the Internet," calling it "a radical
reversal of course that would in and of itself threaten great harm to an open
Internet, competition and innovation." The telco also suggested such a
regulatory change wouldn't withstand legal challenges from ISPs and argued that
the "light-touch regulatory approach" has been central to the
Internet's growth over the past two decades. Verizon challenged the FCC's
previous set of net neutrality rules, and the D.C. Circuit Court earlier this
year struck down rules banning Internet providers from blocking or
discriminating against certain types of content.
Comcast
EVP David Cohen, at an investment conference in May, argued that Title II
doesn't prohibit paid prioritization -- one of the hot-button issues in the
FCC's revised net neutrality rules it proposed earlier this year. "The
whole history" of Title II is that carriers are allowed to provide
different levels of service at different prices, Cohen said.
Such
an approach also would run into a buzzsaw of Republican opposition on Capitol
Hill, where the incoming GOP Senate majority can be expected to place pressure
on the FCC even though it is an independent agency. The commission includes
three Democrats and two Republicans.
The
National Cable and Telecommunications Assn., the lobbying group that represents
the cable industry, said that it was "stunned that the president would
abandon the longstanding and bipartisan policy of lightly regulating the
Internet and calling for extreme Title II regulation.
The
NCTA said that "this tectonic shift in national policy, should it be
adopted, would create devastating results." It called on the FCC to leave
the issue to Congress, which it said can "easily unravel the legal and
jurisdictional knot that has tied up the FCC in crafting sustainable open
Internet rules, without resorting to the rules of the rotary dial phone
era."
Netflix
has been among the most vocal content companies calling for broadband to be
regulated under Title II. In a filing with the FCC this summer, the company
argued that Title II provides the FCC with "a solid basis to adopt
prohibitions on blocking and unreasonable discrimination by ISPs. Opposition to
Title II is largely political, not legal."
Obama's
announcement was greeted by public interest groups, which have been pressing
the FCC to reclassify broadband.
"The
president wasn't kidding when he said he'd take a back seat to no one on net
neutrality," said former FCC commissioner Michael Copps, who is not
serving as an adviser to Common Cause.
"As
someone who has been pushing for Title II since 2002, when the FCC wrongly
classified broadband, I am thrilled. Now the FCC must show the same kind of
leadership and courage."
Demand
Progress, which has led a vocal campaign for reclassification, also praised
Obama's announcement.
"This
is a huge victory for the millions of Americans who have called for Title Ii
reform, and a huge blow for the cable companies that seek to establish fast and
slow lanes on the Internet," said David Segal, executive director of
Demand Progress.
In
a statement, FCC chairman Tom Wheeler called Obama's statement "an
important and welcome addition to the record of the Open Internet proceeding.
"As
an independent regulatory agency we will incorporate the president's submission
into the record of the Open Internet proceeding," he said. "We
welcome comment on it and how it proposes to use Title II of the Communications
Act."
Wheeler
has been working on a "hybrid" approach to net neutrality -- which
would reclassify the so-called "back end" of broadband service while
applying a lighter regulatory touch to retail service. News of the proposal was
greeted with skepticism by public interest groups, who argued that it still
wouldn't prevent Internet providers from giving priority to certain types of
content, like big media companies that pay for speedier access to the consumer.
"The
reclassification and hybrid approaches before us raise substantive legal
questions," Wheeler said. "We found we would need more time to examine
these to ensure that whatever approach is taken, it can withstand any legal
challenges it may face."
Wheeler's
original proposal in April set out to establish rules that would survive legal
challenges yet still would not reclassify the Internet. Public interest groups
sounded the alarm over such an approach, saying that they would be too weak to
prevent so-called "fast lanes," or paid prioritization by Internet
providers.
After
the outcry, Wheeler asked for public comment on his proposal as well as other
approaches, like reclassification or banning paid prioritization outright.
The
FCC has been inundated with more than 4 million comments, a record for an
agency proceeding, with groups like the Writers Guild of America calling for
reclassification. But there also has been a counter campaign by groups urging
the FCC to take a lighter approach to regulation.
In
his statement, Obama also said that the FCC should ban paid prioritization,
saying that "kind of gatekeeping would undermine the level playing field
essential to the Internet's growth." "No service should be stuck in a
'slow lane' because it does not pay a fee." he said. Wheeler also has said
that he opposes Internet "fast lanes."
Obama
also said that the rules should apply to mobile services as well. The previous
set of net neutrality rules, passed in 2010, spared such services from some of
the more significant restrictions.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/internet-broadband-service-obama/2014/11/10/id/606378/#ixzz3Ii0gGT6F
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Headline/internet-broadband-service-obama/2014/11/10/id/606378/#ixzz3Ii0gGT6F
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Obama: ‘I’m going
to do what I need to do’ on immigration
Warming
up his pen…..
Check it out: President Obama repeated Sunday that he intends to change U.S. immigration law through executive action, over Republican leaders’ repeated requests to wait and dire warnings about the consequences of sidestepping Congress.
Check it out: President Obama repeated Sunday that he intends to change U.S. immigration law through executive action, over Republican leaders’ repeated requests to wait and dire warnings about the consequences of sidestepping Congress.
“I’m going to do what I need to
do,” Obama told CBS’ “Face the Nation,” in an interview taped on Friday.
As he has said before, the
president said he would prefer that reform legislation come through Congress,
but that he has waited for more than a year for House Speaker John Boehner to
pass a bill like the Democrat-controlled Senate has done.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34679/obama-im-going-need-immigration/
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/34679/obama-im-going-need-immigration/
Olga Griñan: A TRABAJAR...
To: Lazaro Gonzalez,
Amigos de FB debemos llamar a Marco Rubio (Phone: (305)
418-8553 // 202-224-3041) y a Curbelo (en Facebook) . Curbrlo dice
estar de acuerdo con una ley migratoria "limitada." En nombre
de quien esta hablando? Y Marco Rubio ha dicho en Colombia que EEUU
necesita profesionales que "no tenemos en EEUU" Como es
eso? Y la cantidad de graduados universitarios sin trabajo? Los
politicos estan para hacer la voluntad de los votantes y no lo que les de la
gana. Hay que parar las visas de trabajo mientras tengamos el desempleo
por encima del 3%. Hay que proteger la frontera y fortalecer las leyes de
inmigracion ya existentes. Todos los trabajos deben ser controlados por el
E-Verify. Quien contrate ilegales debe ser multado con mas de $10,000 por
cada ilegal. Ningun ilegal que haya recibido beneficios sociales debe ser
premiado con licencia, estatus legal y mucho menos con ciudadania, y todos los
que hayan cometido crimenes deben ser deportados inmediatamente. El que
quiera permanecer aqui tendra que estar limpio y someterse a un largo
proceso. Nunca tendra ventajas sobre los que esperan para entrar
legalmente, ni siquiera los llamados dreamers. Si no les gusta es su
problema. Los americanos tienen que respetar las leyes en todos los
paises adonde van o pagar las consecuencias. Recientemente un soldado americano
entro POR ERROR a Mexico y estuvo mas de 7 meses preso, hasta fue golpeado y
torturado. Basta ya de hacer el papel de tontos. Nosotros, los
taxpayers y los que hemos trabajado exigimos que los politicos nos pregunten
antes de gastar nuestro dinero. Son 13 billones de dolares invertidos
anualmente en personas que con placer violan nuestras leyes y que no agradecen
nada que hagamos por ellos. Toda persona que reciba ayuda social en dinero,
alimento u otro y envie remesas al extranjero, debera suspendersele para
siempre la ayuda. Exigimos que se atienda primero a nuestros veteranos, a
nuestros soldados, a los ancianos que han trabajado y a las familias de
ciudadanos legales que han cumplido sus obligaciones ciudadanas trabajando y
sosteniendo a sus hijos. Cuando volvamos a tener un super-habit, entonces
tal vez podriamos ayudar a los hijos del vecino. Ahora es tiempo de ayudar en
nuestra casa...
Evelyn Sanguinetti
Lieutenant Governor of Illinois
Evelyn is the
living embodiment of the American dream. A first-generation citizen, Evelyn’s been
beating the odds her entire life. Evelyn’s father legally immigrated to the
United States from Ecuador, and her mother entered the country as a Cuban
refugee. Her parents were still teenagers when she was born in Miami, Florida,
and Evelyn grew up with Spanish as her first language. Her parents often
struggled to make ends meet, and her family moved frequently, whenever they
could no longer afford rent. Evelyn found her way through her love of playing
the piano and was able to attend a top public school for fine arts in Miami.
Through this opportunity, she developed a love of learning and decided to
attend college and pursue a better life. Evelyn received her bachelor’s degree
in piano performance from Florida International University. She soon moved to
Chicago to attend The John Marshall Law School, fell in love with Illinois and
plans to never leave. Following law school, Evelyn worked as an Assistant
Attorney General in the Illinois Attorney General’s Office under Jim Ryan
before transitioning to private practice. She is also an Adjunct Professor of
Law at The John Marshall Law School. In another turning point in her life,
Evelyn suffered a slip and fall accident a few years ago and when being checked
by doctors discovered that she has multiple sclerosis. Evelyn hasn't let it
slow her down. After being given the green light from her doctor, she ran for
City Council of Wheaton, and won in 2011. Evelyn currently lives in Wheaton
with her husband, Raymond, and their three children. She has been involved in
Franklin Middle School, Lowell Elementary School and Jefferson Preschool PTA’s.
Evelyn is also a member of the Wheaton Chamber of Commerce and the Du Page
County Bar Association. Evelyn and her family are active in Cub Scouts, the
Community School of the Arts, Wheaton Briarcliffe Youth Baseball, and sports
within the Wheaton Park District. Born into a family of immigrants with little
means, Evelyn has combined talent, hard work and self-determination to achieve
great things for herself and give back to the local community. She is committed
to making sure all the people of Illinois have a similar opportunity to
succeed.
Bruce Rauner
picks Evelyn Sanguinetti to be Lieutenant Governor
“Evelyn is
the perfect partner to shake up Springfield,” Bruce Rauner said. “She’s
achieved the American Dream and will fight so more in Illinois can reach it
too. She grew up in poverty, relying on public assistance, and worked hard to
become an Illinois Assistant Attorney General, a City Councilmember, and a
teacher at the very law school that gave her the opportunity to work for this
state.”
“She has the
talent and guts to take on the lobbyists, special interests, and career
politicians that are destroying this state and eliminating opportunities for
the next generation,” Rauner said.
“I’m proof
that with hard work, a good education and an opportunity anyone from anywhere
can make it,” Evelyn Sanguinetti said. “Unfortunately, too many in Illinois who
have backgrounds that look a whole lot like mine aren’t being given access to a
quality education or that opportunity to succeed. I understand firsthand how
the policies pushed by the career politicians are failing us and that’s why I’m
excited to bring back and transform Illinois.”
“Vamos a sacudir, y traer de vuelta a Illinois,” Sanguinetti
concluded.
Your 2nd Amendment Rights, Fact Sheet and Video
KrisAnne Hall (thepastorjchall@gmail.com)
To: Lazaro R Gonzalez
|
LIBERTAD FIRST BY KRINANNE HALL.
Hi Lazaro,
Okay, I really hope you liked the videos and fact
sheets on the 1st and 4th amendments. If you didn't get a chance to watch
them here are the two links for your convenience:
·
2nd Amendment Video &
Fact Sheet http://krisannehall.com/4th-amendment-rights/
Feel free to bookmark these pages if you want to
go back and review later and print out the PDF. Make as many copies as you
want. Carry them with you too.
The 3rd video in our series and it's all about
the 2nd amendment. You can watch the video and download the PDF fact sheet
from this page.
KrisAnne Hall
|
8229 25th Drive
Wellborn FL 32094
USA
Wellborn FL 32094
USA
MAPA DEL RESULTADO DE LAS ELECCIONES
EN ESTADOS UNIDOS NOVIEMBRE 4, 2014 La Nación. Jesús Angulo To: jangulo22@aol.com
VER ADJUNTO Y
GUARDELO PARA EL FUTURO
Saludos,
Jesús Angulo
Periodista , Presentador del programa ENTÉRESE,
WLRN TV 17, domingo 6:00 PM y
Productor y Director de TV PARA CUBA http://www.youtube.com/user/TVparaCUBA/videos
Saludos,
Jesús Angulo
Periodista , Presentador del programa ENTÉRESE,
WLRN TV 17, domingo 6:00 PM y
Productor y Director de TV PARA CUBA http://www.youtube.com/user/TVparaCUBA/videos
CUANDO
UNA MOSCA CAE EN LA TAZA DE CAFÉ
1.- El italiano - tira la
taza al suelo, grita a todos y se va lleno de rabia a tomarse un café en otra
parte
2.- El francés - saca la
mosca con dos dedos y se toma el café.
3.- El chino - se come la
mosca y tira el café.
4.- El ruso - se toma el
café con mosca y todo, siempre que no cobren por la mosca.
5.- El israelí - le vende
el café al francés, la mosca al chino, se compra una nueva taza de café y con
el saldo que le queda inventa y desarrolla un aparato para evitar que las
moscas caigan en los cafés.
6.- El palestino - mira
su taza, le echa la culpa al judío por la mosca en su café, protesta ante las
Naciones Unidas por el acto de agresión israelí, toma un
préstamo de la Unión
Europea para comprarse otro café, usa ese dinero para comprar explosivos y
revienta la cafetería. Mientras el italiano, el francés, el
chino y el ruso tratan de
convencer al israelí, de que él tiene la obligación moral de darle su nueva
taza de café al palestino.
Pero para completar el
cuento. Hay moscas que le
caen en el café a algunos políticos arrogantes que conocemos. Creo que esas
moscas son necesarias, las debemos tratar de que ese político haga como el ruso
del cuento, que se tenga que tragar la mosca y el café, que es como si la
mosca y el café lo botaran a él.
¿Que haría usted
personalmente con esta mosca en este café?...
“FREEDOM
IS NOT FREE”
“En mi opinión”
No 792
Noviembre 11, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R
González Miño EDITOR
No comments:
Post a Comment