No 907 “En mi
opinión” Marzo
20, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE
Estamos
buscando un candidato decente a alcalde que no sea un metiroso ni un ladron, ni
un descarado para Miami Dade:
1- Que no
haya sido ni sea político profesional nunca.
2- Que no
se robe los dineros de los contribuyentes.
3- Que se
someta a un tribunal de cuentas al final de su mandato para que testifique que
sus propiedades y peculio no sea mayor de los que represento su sueldo de
alcalde u otras fuentes legales y agenas a su posición de alcalde.
4- Que al
final de su mandato se someta a una inspección de la diferencia de su dinero y
sus propiedades.
5- Que
se comprometa a eliminar el MDX “Miami Dade XpresWay” (Departamento que ha
puesto todos los peajes en las carreteras) Y a eliminar todos los Peajes.
6- Que
no engañe a los contribuyentes tratando de robarse dineros públicos diciendo
que va a reparar el edificio de la corte.
7- Que
no engañe al contribuyente diciendo que el inversionista no van a pedir dineros
públicos y luego le dan dineros públicos.
8- Que no tenga ni hijos ni amigos “Cabilderos”
9- Que
no traiga amigos de el para que sean “Vice-Alcaldes” (Cargo que ni existía) Y
luego les pague $100,000 o más mas gastos.
10-
Que se
comprometa que al final de cada trimestre se reúna con los ciudadanos del condado
a responder las preguntas de los ciudadanos sobre su gestión durante este
trimestre.
11-
Que la deuda y
los movimientos económicos, compras, gastos, del condado sean expuestos en un
sitio público para que los electores puedan tener control de su
administración.
12-
Que sea juzgado
por los tribunales si favorece de forma económica a sus amigos o familiares.
AMENPER:
Proyecto de
acción ejecutiva de Obligaciones Ciudadanas
Washington DC--Presidente Barack Obama ordenó al
gobierno federal el jueves una disposición que aplicará por acción ejecutiva
para un proyecto de ley para declarar la votación obligatoria en las próximas
elecciones, combinada con un proyecto para reducir su uso de la
energía controlada por el libre mercado en un 40 por ciento, mientras que busca
crear una base de cliente cautivo para la industria controlada por el gobierno
y ayudaría a la fluidez de las elecciones con los nuevos votantes.
La casa blanca dijo que los contribuyentes estadounidenses
podrían ahorrar hasta $ 18 billones en costos de electricidad si se obliga a
financiar la máquina de movimiento perpetuo para la creacion de energía en una
máquina que es una combinación de energía solar y fuentes de energía de
viento y que a su vez contaría los votos en las próximas elecciones, esta
máquina serviría para descontinuar las industrias energéticas
existentes de origen pivado en su esfuerzo para apuntalar la nuevas
industrias del gobierno que hacen obsoletas la antigua tecnología de maquinas
energéticas y de contar los votos.
El proyecto de
ley incluirá fuerza obligatoria electoral a todos los ciudadanos, en las
próximas elecciones como ya lo había sugerido, así como los fondos
de la fuerza de la máquina perpetua y se considerará la oposición o el
incumplimiento de cualquiera de las partes como una ofensa criminal.
"Estas son metas
ambiciosas, pero sabemos que son alcanzables los objetivos,", dijo Obama
en el techo del Departamento de energía, donde recorrió un panel solar y una
instalación de molino de viento conectado a la máquina de movimiento perpetuo
que crea energía y cuenta los votos de los electores, después de
firmar la orden ejecutiva en la casa blanca.
Esto es algo que hemos
decidido después que las encuestas enseñan que sólo un 14% de los ciudadanos se
oponen a este proyecto y ese bajo porcentaje son los recalcitrantes
conservadores que no quieren los avances de nuestra administración.
La encuesta enseña que
efectivamente sólo el 14% se opone al proyecto de ley, son conservadores que
consideran el proyecto una estupidez, el 15% de afroamericanos
consideran que si la ley viene de Obama tiene que ser buena, el
71% de los americanos promedio, dijeron no saber qué carajo quiere
decir “perpetua”.
Obama también dijo la
razón de que a la vez que el proyecto de ley incluye la votación obligatoria y
la máquina de movimiento perpetuo obligatoria, es porque la máquina también
será capaz de contar los votos.
Nuestro querido líder
está siguiendo el éxito de uso obligatorio del Obamacare, utilizando la misma
plantilla que se ramifican a otras industrias.
LUIS
ALMAGRO: OTRO PRO-COMUNISTA NOMBRADO SECRETARIO GENERAL DE LA OEA. “EMO” otro
mas para el estercolero. +Porque
los USA no se retira de la OEA y de la ONU si es que son nidos de comunistas. LRGM.
|
He aquí su biografía según sus camaradas de Tele
Sur, el ALBA y los “socialistas del Siglo XXI”. Más claro, ni el agua:
Luis Leonardo Almagro Lemes es un
político, abogado y diplomático uruguayo nacido en 1963 en Paysandú (oeste de
Uruguay) y es
militante del partido de izquierda, Frente Amplio.
En sus 51 años de vida y más de 20 en
carrera política, fungió como primer secretario y encargado de negocios en la
embajada de Uruguay en la República Islámica de Irán entre 1991 y 1996. Del
mismo modo, fue representante de Uruguay ante la Organización de Naciones
Unidas para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura (Unesco) en 1998.
En su país, Almagro ejerció como
director de la unidad de asuntos internacionales del Ministerio de Ganadería,
Agricultura y Pesca, y como asesor del entonces ministro de esa cartera, José
“Pepe” Mujica (2005). Entre 2007 y 2010 fue embajador de Uruguay en China.
En 2010, luego de que “Pepe” fuera electo presidente, Almagro pasó a ser
canciller. En las elecciones uruguayas de 2014, Almagro fue candidato a la
cámara alta, y resultó electo senador para el período 2015-2020.
Decisiones destacadas Al frente de la
Cancillería uruguaya, Almagro dejó su huella negociando la recepción en Uruguay
de ex detenidos en la base militar estadounidense de Guantánamo, un acuerdo que
quedó sellado en un encuentro entre Barack Obama y el “Pepe”, en Washington.
Destacando como un defensor de la unión y de concretar a América Latina como
una zona de paz, participó en las negociaciones para la reanudación de diálogos
entre Cuba y Estados Unidos. De igual forma, Almagro negoció los detalles de la
llegada de refugiados de la crisis en Siria.
Este contenido ha sido publicado
originalmente por teleSUR bajo la siguiente dirección:
Jorge Alberto Villalón Y.
THIS IS WHAT "BROKE" LOOKS LIKE !
Amazing isn't It
?
Welcome to the
Clintons ' $11 Million Dollar
Mansion ,-- New York state
Hillary
Rodham Clinton, as a New York State Senator now comes under this fancy "congressional retirement staffing plan" which means that if she never gets re-elected, she STILL receives her Congressional salary until she dies.
If Bill out-lives her, he then inherits HER salary until he dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary ($20,000 a month) until he dies. If Hillary out-lives Bill, she also gets HIS salary until she dies, Guess
who pays for that? WE DO!
Rodham Clinton, as a New York State Senator now comes under this fancy "congressional retirement staffing plan" which means that if she never gets re-elected, she STILL receives her Congressional salary until she dies.
If Bill out-lives her, he then inherits HER salary until he dies. He is already getting his Presidential salary ($20,000 a month) until he dies. If Hillary out-lives Bill, she also gets HIS salary until she dies, Guess
who pays for that? WE DO!
Clinton's 20 Acre
- $11 million mansion is common knowledge. For
her to establish NY residency, they purchased this mansion in
upscale Chappaqua , New York ....makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense.
upscale Chappaqua , New York ....makes sense. They are entitled to Secret Service protection for life. Still makes sense.
Here is where it becomes interesting. Their mortgage payments are around $10,000/month. But an extra
residence had to be built by the government on the acreage to house the Secret
Service Agents. Any
improvement to the property is owned by the property owners...the Clinton 's.
So....the Clinton's charge the federal government $10,000 monthly rent for the use of the extra residence to house the
Secret Service staff which is just about equal to their mortgage payment.
He is the ONLY ex-president to use this loophole, thus earning the name 'Slick Willie'.
improvement to the property is owned by the property owners...the Clinton 's.
So....the Clinton's charge the federal government $10,000 monthly rent for the use of the extra residence to house the
Secret Service staff which is just about equal to their mortgage payment.
He is the ONLY ex-president to use this loophole, thus earning the name 'Slick Willie'.
This means that
we, the taxpayers, pay the Clinton's, salary, mortgage, transportation, safety and security as well as the salaries for their 12 man staff and it is
all perfectly legal.
AND DON’T FORGET
HIS GOVERNOR’S PENSION AND HER SECRETARY OF STATE PENSION…..
When She runs
for President, will you vote for her ?
What
Obama Just Said About Voting In the U.S. Reveals The Scary Truth Behind His
Amnesty Scheme
"fundamentally
transforming the United States of America..."
Any
time Barack Obama uses a word like “transformative,” people who cherish the
Constitution and the rule of law have learned to brace themselves against a
likely storm of liberal attack that will further erode the foundations of
traditional America.
Speaking
before a town hall on Wednesday in Cleveland, President Obama used the “t” word
— transformative — to describe how the country would be changed if voting were
not voluntary, but mandatory.
NBC News reports that the president told the audience
something that was eerily reminiscent of his now infamous declaration years ago
to his adoring acolytes about “fundamentally transforming the United States of
America.” Said the president only a day ago:
“It would
be transformative if everybody voted.
“If
everybody voted, then it would completely change the political map in this
country.”
Purportedly,
in making those remarks the president was talking about counteracting the
influence of big money in politics. But paying close attention to what Obama
told the Cleveland crowd reveals why compulsory voting would indeed be
“transformative” — transformative for Democrats who would likely gain
significant and possibly permanent political power from making sure certain
voter groups went to the polls.
“[Obama]
added that the people who tend not to vote are ‘young, they’re lower income,
they’re skewed more heavily toward immigrant groups and minorities … There’s a
reason why some folks try to keep them away from the polls.'”
Obama’s
beginning to talk about mandatory voting in the United States might well
suggest to conservatives why the president and his liberal allies are so intent
on pushing forward with amnesty for illegal immigrants — a scheme that many
worry would lead to voting rights for millions of illegals whose political
allegiance would most certainly lie with their Democrat benefactors.
In
a post on Western Journalism a little more than a month ago, writer L.
Todd Wood noted a revealing article from The Washington Times that would
explain why mandatory voting could lock in power for Progressives:
President
Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal
immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections
officials testified to Congress on Thursday, saying that the driver’s
licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting
loophole.
DAILY EVENTS FEATURED STORY
Why Rubio Shouldn’t Run…for
Senate
Marco Rubio: I'm Ready To Be President
There are half-dozen
substantial reasons to support Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) apparent decision not
to seek re-election. It is becoming evident that he will soon announce he is
foregoing another Senate term in order to concentrate fully on a presidential
run, and his move will prove correct.
Rubio’s impending decision is
consistent within the context of assuming his ultimate goal is to become
President of the United States, and not a national legislator or political
figure. In politics, timing is everything and Sen. Rubio, at just 43 years of
age, will have many options to continue his promising career even if his 2016
presidential gambit falls short.
He’s also right to commit to
just one political campaign next year. Running for President while fighting a
contested Senate re-election battle in what is America’s toughest swing state would
surely end in failure to some major degree.
Reason Number One: Sen. Rubio
can test the presidential waters because he has a respectable chance of winning
the nomination. A brilliant campaigner who came from nowhere in 2010 to destroy
incumbent Florida Gov. Charlie Crist in the Senate GOP primary – to the point
where the chief executive was even forced to unceremoniously leave the party –
Rubio will connect with the grassroots constituencies that are so important to
scoring well in the early states of Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and South
Carolina. Winning a state and exceeding expectations early would then make him
viable in the big, delegate-rich states like say, Florida, for example.
Reason Two: If the Florida
Senator loses the nomination but maintains good relations with the eventual
winner, he will be on the Vice Presidential short list, thus continuing to
expand his stature. If Rubio is selected as the VP nominee, he will either win
or be more experienced after a national general election run. Either way, he’s
the likely early front-runner heading into 2020, if the Democrats win, or 2024
if the Republican ticket is victorious.
As a person who can excite
crowds, constituencies and, most importantly, the Republican base, Sen. Rubio
has also proven he can win in the most important state on the GOP presidential
map, in addition to having an obvious appeal to the burgeoning Hispanic voter
population. Certainly such attributes will be badly needed on the GOP ticket
for any presidential nominee.
Reason Three: Florida will
host an open Governor’s race in 2018 because Gov. Rick Scott (R) is ineligible
to seek a third term. Clearly, if he were not President or Vice President,
Rubio would have the option of returning home to run for Governor. Winning this
election would add executive experience to his legislative record, thus
completing his resume.
Additionally, Sen. Bill
Nelson (D) also comes in-cycle then and turning 76 years of age at that time
after completing what will be 30 years of congressional service, the veteran
politician may call it a career. This would mean an open Senate race to
compliment an incumbent-less Governor’s contest, thus giving Rubio yet one more
option if he felt a Washington return would better suit him.
Reason Four: Mr. Rubio would
also have the option of not running at all in 2018, but rather spending his
political time preparing a 2020 presidential bid. Becoming a media commentator,
political pundit, and author is a proven path to launch a presidential
campaign, and it’s a bonus when already having elective experience. This would
be a particularly attractive option if a new Democratic President begins to
experience popularity problems, which will invariably be the case after
ten-plus consecutive years of one-party White House control.
Reason
Five: Realistically, Rubio’s Senate re-election is not guaranteed and therefore
running again might be a bigger risk than not. In anticipation of the Senator’s
national move, Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-FL) has reportedly scheduled his own
political announcement for March 23rd.
Murphy, he says, will run for the Senate irrespective of Rubio’s plans. The
young Congressman is a strong candidate. Therefore, a hard fought Florida swing
Senate race is guaranteed, no matter what the circumstances.
Reason Six: What does serving
another Senate term really accomplish for Mr. Rubio? He already has the
experience of being a Senator, and continuing to serve in a body that just 10%
of people believe is doing a good job is hardly a way to forge a positive
image. Additionally, with Congress trapped in what appears to be a terminal
state of gridlock, little realistic opportunity presents itself to craft
meaningful legislation that will actually be enacted.
Though the Florida Senate
seat – and the Republican majority with it – will be at greater risk without
Rubio running for re-election, the better long-term play dictates striking
while the presidential political iron is hot, and with full force. A man with
options always has the luxury of moving quickly…and should. Sen. Marco Rubio is
such a man.
Iran endorses
nuclear EMP attack on United States
image:
http://conservbyte.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Iran-Military-Chief-AP-300x204.jpg
Obama would let them do this and blame Bush.
Check it out:
Check it out:
Suspected
for years of plotting to dismantle the U.S. electric grid, American officials
have confirmed that Iranian military brass have endorsed a nuclear
electromagnetic pulse explosion that would attack the country’s power system.
American defense experts made the discovery while translating a
secret Iranian military handbook, raising new concerns about Tehran’s recent
nuclear talks with the administration.
The issue of a nuclear EMP attack was raised in the final hours of
this week’s elections in Israel when U.S. authority Peter Vincent Pry penned a
column for Arutz Sheva warning of Iran’s threat to free nations.
“Iranian
military documents describe such a scenario — including a recently translated
Iranian military textbook that endorses nuclear EMP attack against the United
States,” he wrote.
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/03/iran-endorses-nuclear-emp-attack-on-united-states/
Read more at http://conservativebyte.com/2015/03/iran-endorses-nuclear-emp-attack-on-united-states/
|
Scott Walker Hits the Trail in South Carolina on Road to GOP
Nomination.
|
|
Dear Lazaro R
Conservative
Gov. Scott Walker hits
 the trail today in South
Carolina — one of the big three early battleground states on the
road to the Republican presidential nomination.
In
South Carolina, the votes of the religious and the deeply conservative hold
great sway. The son of a Baptist preacher who has built his reputation as
someone who has stood up for conservative caucuses in a purple state, Walker hopes to appeal to those sets of overlapping voters.
Walker
has been positioning himself as someone who can appeal to his party's
conservative and moderate wings. He points to his success in Wisconsin, where he has won election
three times in four years even though the state — as he likes to point out — hasn't voted
for a Republican for president since 1984…
Walker
stands at second place among Republicans in South Carolina, according to an average of three polls conducted in that state
compiled by Real Clear Politics. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush had
17.7% and Walker had 15.7%.
Lindsey
Graham, a U.S. senator from South Carolina, placed third with 14%. Two others
had double digits — retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson (11.5%) and former
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (10.7%)…." (Journal Sentinel, 3/19)
A
genuine conservative with big, bold conservative ideas — Scott Walker has the leadership qualities so urgently needed in
Washington today.
Scott
Walker is strongly considering a run for President.
As he
tours early primary states like South Carolina, Iowa, and New Hampshire, it
is critical for conservatives to rally their support behind Scott Walker.
We need
to encourage him in the strongest of terms to take the next immediate step —
Go, Scott, Go! Scott Walker 2016!
Let
send a BIG, BOLD message to Scott Walker — take the next immediate step, champion our conservative
American values, and ‘we’ve got your back’!
‘Go
Big, Go Bold’ — Conservative leadership for America — Scott
Walker 2016!
Go
Scott, Go!
Bob
Adams
Treasurer
Go Big,
Go Bold PAC
P.S. — As Scott Walker tours early primary states like South Carolina, Iowa, and New Hampshire, it is critical for conservatives to rally their support behind Scott Walker.
P.P.S.
— Now is the time for conservatives to
 rally behind Scott Walker. With your pledge of any amount, we’d be happy to send you this
awesome ‘Go Big, Go Bold!’ bumpersticker! It’s our way of saying thank you — while helping to build
support for Scott Walke |
Access, Denied: More Gun
Sellers Blocked From Financial Sector
After
serving multiple deployments overseas with the U.S. Army Special Forces, Josh
Burns began building his own rifles at home.
In Sept.
2013, he and his wife Felicia, who also served in the military, decided they
would make a business out of selling guns.
“This is his hobby that [Josh] masks as a
business so he can play with guns,” Felicia told The Daily Signal recently
while setting up their stand at the New Orleans Area Gun and Knife Show.
But starting their small business, Apocalypse Sports in Ponchatoula, La., wasn’t so easy.
What they
found, is that because they sell guns, payment processors did not want to do
business with them.
Problems
With Processors
Felicia
was in charge of finding a payment processor, which is a third-party outlet
that handles credit card transactions between merchants and banks. In a world
where credit cards are a primary method of payment, it’s one of the first
things a start-up must do.
Felicia
told The Daily Signal she was declined from three different payment processor
companies—one of which, PayPal, froze their account.
For
awhile, she only blamed herself.
“I just
thought the whole payment [and] gateway system was a difficult thing to get
around if you’re not a computer geek,” Felicia said, laughing.
Since
this is my first start-up business, I didn’t realize that there were any
different barriers to me selling guns than versus someone selling mascara or
lipstick at a stand.
Felicia then came across TransNational, one of the few payment processors that
does business with firearms and ammunition vendors.
From then
on, she didn’t give the issue much thought.
“I’m not
personally outraged,” Felicia said of her original dealings with payment
processors. “It was frustrating—I just think it’s their loss.”
Treatment
of Gun Sellers
Another
vendor who set up shop at the New Orleans gun show wonders why the product he
sells would make his business more scrutinized.
“Honestly,
we are relegated to porn sites,” Bart Wilson, owner of Advanced Weapon Systems
and Security Concepts in Baton Rouge, La., said. “I’ve actually had this
conversation with bank managers, and [for example] that is Bank One’s policy.
Gun companies are no different from porn sites as far as they’re concerned.”
Bart
Wilson, owner of Advanced Weapon Systems and Security Concepts in Baton Rouge,
La.
Wilson is
currently trying to expand his business to include a flea auction site for
guns, but isn’t having much luck.
One bank,
after finally accepting his business, told him it would be a “24.9 percent
processing charge, plus the gateway [payment] was going to be some ridiculous
amount per month.”
As a comparison, PayPal, a processing company
that has a blanket policy against firearms sellers, charges about 2.9 percent per transaction.
That’s how
gun sellers say it works: Firearms companies eventually find the financial
service they need, but often at higher rates than other small businesses would.
Who’s at
Fault?
While some
firearms sellers might blame banks for not wanting to do business with them,
others blame Operation Choke Point.
Designed
by the Justice Department in 2013 as a way to crack down on banks and payment
processors who enable fraud, the program encourages banks to more closely monitor
their customer base for fraud.
The agency
does so by partnering with banking regulators to communicate to banks what is
considered a “high risk” business. The Justice Department then pursues lawsuits
against banks engaging in “risky” behavior.
Since the
program’s initiation, the Justice Department has negotiated three settlements
under Operation Choke Point, two of which were announced by the agency last
week.
The
controversy centers around 2011 guidelines created by the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation (FDIC), which labeled firearms and ammunition sellers
“high risk” industries, pinning them right alongside pornography and other
blatantly illegal enterprises like Ponzi schemes and racist materials.
The list
was adopted into the Justice Department’s Operation Choke Point.
Although
the list has since been removed from official guidance, it appears banks are no
more inclined to accept customers like Wilson or the Burns.
Furthermore,
the question about why firearms and ammunition sellers were targeted in a
program that aims to reduce fraud has yet to be answered by Justice Department
officials.
Fraud and
the Firearms Industry
Krista Lowery, vice president of the Target
Marketing Group of Payment Alliance — another gun-friendly payment
processor — told The Daily Signal that because of all the regulations in place
to prevent a weapon from landing in the wrong hands, cases of fraud within the
firearms industry are rare.
“Because
of the strict guidelines set forth by the [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives] as to whom and how guns can be sold, firearms dealers have
significantly more data on their customers than any other type of specialty
retail merchant,” she said.
In other
business types, a customer can order something on a website and the merchant ships
the product to the address the customer specifies, essentially making it
possible to never physically interact with the customer. Even in the case of
internet selling, firearms have to be delivered via a [federal firearms
license] holder who validates the background and identity of the customer. No
other industry can be more sure of their customer.
Congress
will get a chance to put Operation Choke Point under fire during a March 24
hearing hosted by the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations.
Led by
Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis., the FDIC will face questions about its involvement in
the program and why citizens like the Burns and Wilson struggle to obtain basic
financial services.
“Who was
involved? How high does it go?” Duffy told The Daily Signal. “And has anyone
been held accountable? We’re holding this hearing to get those answers. The
countless people who have been impacted by this deserve those answers.”
As for
Josh and Felicia Burns, though they’ve faced their fair share of frustrations,
they are not worried that Operation Choke Point will force their business to
shut down.
“I’m one
of those people that, you tell me not to do something, I’m going to do it that
much harder,” Josh said.
“En mi opinión”
No comments:
Post a Comment