No 888 “En mi
opinión” Marzo
10, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
Enero 20, 2017 FIN DEL DISPARATE
AMENPER: Claro que no me
gusta el compatriota Menéndez.
Recuerdo su apoyo a Obama y a las causas
liberales. Claro que pienso que a lo mejor es culpable de haber
usado el jet privado del Dr. Melgen para sus campañas políticas (que incluyen
su ayuda a la campaña de Obama).
Pero precisamente por esto estoy seguro que
la administración de Obama sabía de esto si es verdad. ¿Entonces por
qué no le presentaron los cargos antes?
¿Por qué los cargos se presentan ahora
cuando Menéndez se ha declarado contra la política exterior de Obama
con respecto a Cuba, Irán y Rusia?
Tiene que haber escepticismo sobre la
conducta no sólo de Menéndez pero de la administración de Obama.
Si Menéndez es culpable, más culpable es la
administración. Si se presentan cargos contra Menéndez también hay
que presentar cargos contra los oficiales de esta administración que se
hicieron de la vista gorda por conveniencia política.
Esto es lo que dice el Wall Street Journal
en su editorial de hoy, no puede estar más acertado.
Los cargos contra Menendez
El momento ha producido escepticismo a la
derecha y la izquierda.
El valor predeterminado partidismo en casos de presunta corrupción política
es para todos los de la parte opuesta o filosofía escéptica. Así esto habla
volúmenes sobre la pérdida de credibilidad del Departamento de Justicia del
Presidente Obama Departamento que las primicias de noticias de la semana pasada
a los medios de que se están preparando cargos federales contra el senador
demócrata Robert Menéndez ha generado escepticismo a través de la división
ideológica.
Es imposible juzgar los cargos sin una acusación formal, y con el Sr.
Menéndez estamos hablando de Nueva Jersey, que compite con Chicago como una
línea rasa sobre la corrupción política. Las historias dicen que al Sr.
Menéndez se cargará con el uso de su oficina para ayudar a un amigo y un
donante, Florida el oculista Dr. Salomón Melgen, con privilegioss federales. .
Menéndez respondió diciendo: "Me he siempre comportado apropiadamente y de
acuerdo con la ley."
El escepticismo se deriva la naturaleza politizada del Eric Holder
Departamento de justicia, así como abusos anteriores en su sección de
integridad pública. Recuerda la acusación al senador Ted Stevens en medio de su
campaña de reelección en el 2008. Su condena fue echada a un lado después de
que un juez determinó que la Fiscalía había retenido evidencia exculpatoria
"significativa".
La sincronización de los cargos de Menéndez también es políticamente
sospechosa. El Senador demócrata es un destacado crítico de la política
exterior del señor Obama en Rusia, Cuba e Irán. El Sr. Obama acusó
recientemente a los críticos de su diplomacia de Irán de inclinarse ante sus
donantes políticos — es decir, a los judíos estadounidenses. Según el New York
Times, el Sr. Menéndez se levantó en una reunión privada de senadores
democrátas para decirle al Presidente que él personalmente se sintió ofendido
por esos comentarios. Las negociaciones sobre el programa nuclear de Irán están
viniendo a la cabeza de este mes, y es conveniente para el presidente si un
crítico destacado de su política exterior, está operando bajo una nube de
ética.
Todo lo cual quiere decir que es importante mirar de cerca las pruebas y
los cargos en este caso y las pruebas ante un jurado. Este departamento de
justicia merece ser tratado con tantas dudas como cualquier político de Nueva
Jersey.
The Menendez Charges
The timing has produced skepticism on the right and left.
March 8, 2015 7:15
p.m. ET
The partisan
default in cases of alleged political corruption is for everyone of the
opposite party or philosophy to pile on. So it speaks volumes about the lost
credibility of President Obama ’s Justice Department that last week’s leaks to
the media that federal charges are being prepared against Democratic Senator
Robert Menendez has produced skepticism across the ideological divide.
It’s impossible to
judge the charges without a formal indictment, and Mr. Menendez is from New
Jersey, which rivals Chicago as a laugh line about political corruption. The
stories say Mr. Menendez will be charged with using his office to aid a friend
and donor, Florida eye-doctor Salomon Melgen, with federal business. Mr.
Menendez responded by saying, “I have always conducted myself appropriately and
in accordance with the law.”
The skepticism
results from the politicized nature of Eric Holder ’s Justice Department as
well as previous abuses in its Public Integrity Section. Recall the indictment
of the late Senator Ted Stevens in the middle of his re-election campaign in
2008. His conviction was set aside after a judge found the prosecution had
withheld “significant” exculpatory evidence.
The timing of the
Menendez charges is also politically suspicious. The Senate Democrat is a
leading critic of Mr. Obama’s foreign policy on Russia, Cuba and Iran. Mr.
Obama recently accused critics of his Iran diplomacy of bowing to their
political donors—that is, to Jewish Americans. According to the New York Times
, Mr. Menendez rose at a private meeting of Democratic Senators to tell the
President he was personally offended by those remarks. The negotiations on
Iran’s nuclear program are coming to a head this month, and it doesn’t hurt the
President if a prominent critic is operating under an ethical cloud.
All of which is to
say that it’s important to look closely at the evidence and charges in this
case and test them before a jury. This Justice Department deserves to be
treated with as much doubt as any New Jersey politician.
 |
Click here to Reply
to all, Reply, or Forward
|
Corruption Case against Menendez Hard to Support
CBNNews.com
Federal prosecutors could have a tough time making a
corruption case against New Jersey Democratic Sen. Robert Menendez, should they
pursue those charges.
The case would involve a friend who has been a
financial supporter of Menendez.
The Washington Post reports the members of Congress have several legal
defenses they can use in such cases and Menendez has been friends with the man
in question for decades.
The Wall Street Journal's editorial page says both conservatives and liberals
have questions about the political nature of the possible charges because
Menendez has been a leading critic of President Barack Obama's policies on
Russia, Cuba, and Iran.
AMENPER: LAS DISCULPAS DE LOS CLINTON…
El ex Presidente Bill Clinton el sábado defendió la práctica de su
fundación familiar de tomar dinero de países extranjeros, argumentando que
mientras él no está de acuerdo con todas las políticas de los países que
contribuyeron, cree que la Fundación ha "hecho mucho más bien que
mal".
"Los Emiratos Árabes Unidos nos dieron dinero. ¿Estamos de acuerdo con todo lo
que hacen?. No. Pero ellos nos están ayudando a combatir ISIS y construyeron
una gran universidad con abierta a personas de todo el mundo,"
"¿estoy de acuerdo con toda la política de Arabia Saudita? No."
Está bien, puede decir lo que quiera, pero vamos hacer igual que hacemos en
el otoño, vamos a darle marcha atrás al reloj y vamos a ir a los años del
embargo a Sur Africa, de un embargo verdadero no como el que se han hecho en
Cuba.
Vamos a poner estas declaraciones de Clinton en ese contexto:
“El gobierno de Sur Africa nos dio dinero ¿Estamos de
acuerdo con todo lo que hacen? No. Pero ellos nos están ayudando a combatir
Angola y construyeron una gran universidad abierta a personas de todo el mundo”
¿Estoy de acuerdo con toda la política de Sur Africa? No
Claro que ni Clinton ni ninguno de los liberales hubiera recibido dinero de
Sur Africa, porque hubiera sido una complicidad implícita, porque esto lo
obligaba a dar algo en cambio .
Todo lo que los Clinton dieron, es indeterminado, sabe Dios qué, pero lo
que evidentemente dieron en cambio es el silencio a la ayuda de Arabia Saudita a los
terroristas y el silencio sobre la opresión a las mujeres en los países árabes
mientras se dan golpes de pecho como defensores de las mujeres en los Estados
Unidos.
AMENPER: Vermín Supreme Candidato Demócrata
Ahora que Hillary no parece tener mucho chance para ser el candidato del
partido demócrata, creo que
Vermín Supreme debe de ser el candidato alternativo.
Vermín ha sido Republicano, Libertario, anarquista, socialista, anarquista
comunista y ahora quiere ser candidato al partido Demócrata.
Tiene un historial muy bueno en el pasado,
Ha sido un candidato alternativo en diversas elecciones locales,
estatales y nacionales en los Estados Unidos. Supremo es conocido por llevar un
sombrero en forma de bota y un cepillo de dientes grande. Ha dicho que si es
elegido Presidente de los Estados Unidos, pasará una ley que requiere a
toda la gente cepillarse los dientes, lo cual es una medida de higiene muy
conveniente.
También hizo campaña en 2012 en una plataforma de conocimiento apocalipsis
zombie (y plan energético basado en zombies) y tiene un plan para viajar en el
tiempo como medio de investigación. Promete un caballito pony gratis para todos
los estadounidenses.
Participó en las protestas de Occupy Boston.
Supreme, que no revela su nombre de nacimiento, nació en creció cerca
Boston, Massachusetts y se dice que es el mayor de tres hijos de padres
desconocidos. Se graduó de la High School secundaria de Gloucester en los años
80, y luego se mudó a Baltimore para asistir a la escuela de arte, pero se
retiró y comenzó a bandas de Rock para clubes clandestinos.
En 1986, se unió a la gran marcha para la paz en marzo para el Desarme
Nuclear Mundial en protesta de las armas nucleares.
A partir de 1987 en adelante, empezó a correr para un cargos
públicos.
Legalmente cambió su nombre a Vermin Supreme en la década de 1990 mientras
estaba en Baltimore.
Suprema cuando se postuló para alcalde de Baltimore como independiente,en
unas eleccionen en la que perdió ante Kurt L. Schmoke.
También se postuló para alcalde de Detroit como independiente, en el cual
perdió a Coleman Young. Finalmente, se postuló para alcalde de Mercury, Nevada,
pero no tuvo éxito tampoco,.
En el año 2000, Supremo proclamó el "emperador del nuevo milenio"
lo que se ha convertido en un punto focal de sus campañas presidenciales
Supreme hizo campaña en el Washington, DC primario presidencial en
2004, donde obtuvo 149 votos.. Según la Comisión Federal de elecciones
(FEC), también recibió 43 votos, a nivel nacional, en las elecciones
generales.2012
Vermin Supreme hizo campaña como un demócrata en las elecciones
presidenciales de 2012
El 14 de abril de 2011: Participó en el primer Debate del nuevo ciclo de
elecciones en Convención el IGLO disidentes que también incluyó Jimmy McMillan,
Jill Stein y otros.
El 29 de octubre de 2011: Calificó a figurar en la votación primaria del
partido demócrata de 2012 en New Hampshire.
El 29 de octubre de 2011: Participó en un debate contra un representante de
la campaña del difunto ocultista británico Aleister Crowley.
El 19 de diciembre de 2011: Participó en el "foro de los menos
conocidos candidatos presidenciales en el partido demócrata", en el
Instituto de política de New Hampshire en Saint Anselm College y el 3 de enero
de 2012 fue un candidato en las primarias democráticas de Iowa y recibió 1,4%
de los votos.
El 12 de enero de 2012: En la primaria democrática en New Hampshire,
Supremo recibió 833 votos. (Barack Obama ganó las primarias con 49.080 votos)
Pero Vermín dice que no contaron bien sus votos, que el ganó.
El 2 de febrero de 2012: Supreme participó en un debate en
directo con el candidato republicano Jimmy McMillan en honor del día de la
marmota
Fue un participante en las protestas contra la OTAN en el 20 – 21 de mayo
durante la Cumbre de la OTAN de Chicago.
En mayo, visitó unaa segundria regional en Maine para dar un discurso
sobre su estilo de campaña a una clase de gobierno.
El 25 de agosto de 2012: Supreme, después de perder (o como dice que se la
robaron) las primarias demócratas, anunció su nuevo partido
político, el partido "Pony Gratis", y anunció que había elegido
de vicepresidente a su a oponente Jimmy McMillan como su compañero
de ticket presidencial. Aunque , McMillan declaró que todavía corría para Presidente
en su propia plataforma.
El 5 de octubre de 2012: Participó en un debate organizado por Peter Schiff
en el Peter Schiff Radio Show, que contó con un panel de los candidatos
presidenciales
Vermín considera que su tiempo ha llegado para ganar su primera elección
como presidente de los Estados Unidos.
Supreme está haciendo otra carrera presidencial en el año 2016. y
se ha embarcado en una gira por 20 ciudades para construir apoyo para su
campaña y busca calificar para fondos de contrapartida de la FEC. (su única
entrada monetaria conocida)
Espera correr en las primarias demócratas si Hillary Clinton abandona la
carrera
Creo que con este historial sería un buen candidato para el partido
demócrata, lo recomendamos altamente. Sería un buen oponente para
Scott Walker debíamos de cooperar con él economicamente para que pueda ser el
candidato..
Aunque pensándolo bien, después de la experiencia con Obama, debemos de ser
cuidadosos, podría ser electo nuestro próximo presidente.
JESUS MARZO FERNANDEZ: LA OBRA DE LOS
COMUNISTAS
|
Inbox
|
x
|
|
|
Marzo Fernandez: QUE CLASE DE NEGOCIO PARA LOS
AGRICULTORES DE EEUU Y A 90 MILLAS. INCREIBLE PERO CIERTO
CUBA : UN PAIS AGROPECUARIO
LA TIERRA MAS HERMOSA QUE OJOS HUMANOS HAYAN VISTO
CON CAPACIDAD PARA 3 COSECHAS AL ANO
CON PERSONAS CALIFICADAS
CON AGUA, REGADIO , Y TODO LO QUE SE NECESITA PARA
PRODUCIR.
QUE EN 1959 EXPORTABA MAS DE 1TN DE ALIMENTOS POR HABITANTES. RECORD NADIE LA HA SUPERADO.
CUBA : UN PAIS AGROPECUARIO
LA TIERRA MAS HERMOSA QUE OJOS HUMANOS HAYAN VISTO
CON CAPACIDAD PARA 3 COSECHAS AL ANO
CON PERSONAS CALIFICADAS
CON AGUA, REGADIO , Y TODO LO QUE SE NECESITA PARA
PRODUCIR.
QUE EN 1959 EXPORTABA MAS DE 1TN DE ALIMENTOS POR HABITANTES. RECORD NADIE LA HA SUPERADO.
PRODUCIA
EL 92 % DE LA QUE CONSUMIA
DONDE
ESTA LA INDUSTRIA AZUCARERA, LA GANADERIA, EL
CAFE,
LOS FRUTALES. DESPARECIERON EL TABACO AUCTOTONO
DE
CUBA. QUE MAS FALTA POR DESTRUIR.
UN
PAIS SIN GUERRA, SIN OCUPACION, LA OBRA DE LOS
COMUNISTAS.
GRAN
NEGOCIO PARA EEUU.
Compras de
Cuba en alimentos a EEUU: $4,980 millones desde 2001; $6 millones en medicinas
El gobierno
cubano redujo en un 17 por ciento las compras de alimentos y más de la mitad la
adquisición de medicinas y equipamiento médico a Estados Unidos durante el
pasado año, en una estrategia que pudiera convertirse en mecanismo de presión
sobre los intereses comerciales norteamericanos.
A pesar del
declive, el monto total de las operaciones durante los últimos 14 años de
comercio restringido con Cuba asciende a $4,980 millones de dólares
Por segundo
año consecutivo, las operaciones de la estatal Alimport con empresas
estadounidenses cayeron en picada hasta los $291.2 millones, mientras que en el
sector de la salud pública apenas alcanzaron $879 mil dólares después de haber
repuntado hasta los $2.15 millones en el 2013, según estadísticas divulgadas
por el Consejo Económico y Comercial EEUU-Cuba (USCTEC), con sede en Nueva
York.
Las ventas de
medicinas y equipos médicos, con carácter restringido, están autorizadas por la
Ley de Democracia para Cuba (Ley Torricelli), de 1992. El USTEC compila registros
en esta categoría desde el 2003 y la cifra de operaciones supera los $6
millones.
Pollo congelado
Respecto al
volumen de productos alimenticios, se trata de la cifra de importación más baja desde el
2003,cuando Cuba compró solo $256.9 millones.
La mitad del
dinero que invirtió Alimport en sus compras a Estados Unidos fue en pollo
congelado ($147.5
millones, el 50% del total de las operaciones). El resto se repartió en aceite
de soya ($67.3 millones), granos de soya ($30.5 millones) y maíz ($28.2 millones.
Como dato curioso, también compraron $32,000 dólares en frutas frescas.
Desde que el
Congreso autorizó las transacciones transacciones comerciales con Cuba en el
2000, solo en cuatro ocasiones se han registrado cifras por debajo de los $300
millones anuales. El pico de las compras ocurrió en el 2008, con $710
millones.
Pero lo
notorio de este descenso es que durante el 2014 Cuba tuvo que aumentar sus
compras de alimentos en el extranjero hasta los $2,057 millones de dólares,
debido a las limitaciones en la producción interna, el incremento de los
precios en el mercado internacional y las carencias de insumos básicos para la
canasta familiar, y la decisión no fue comprar a firmas estadounidenses.
El mercado
estadounidense representó solo el 14 por ciento de las importaciones
alimentarias de Cuba.
El reporte de
USCTEC -entidad independiente- se basa en los reportes oficiales de los
departamentos de Agricultura y Comercio, así como en los registros de compañías
exportadoras, pero no incluye los costos añadidos de transportación, recargos
bancarios y otros gastos derivados de los envíos de mercancías a la isla.
Falta de liquidez
La entidad
atribuyó esta caída a la falta de liquidez del gobierno cubano, las facilidades
de compras a crédito con Venezuela, China y Brasil, y a motivaciones
políticas sobre empresas, representantes federales, estatales y locales para
cabildear contra las restricciones impuestas por el embargo.
“Esa táctica
tuvo éxito en el pasado, pero su efectividad se ha evaporado”, consideró John
S. Kavulich, presidente de USCTEC.
Kavulich cree
que la nueva política de la Casa Blanca hacia la isla pudiera estimular las
ventas en el 2015, cuando el gobierno cubano planea desembolsar $2,194 millones
($137 millones más que el pasado año).
Por lo pronto,
un poderoso brazo de congresistas (republicanos y demócratas) de estados
eminentemente agrícolas, con el empuje de la flamante Coalición Agrícola de
Estados Unidos, establecida a comienzos de enero, podrían inclinar la balanza a
favor de mayores oportunidades de comercio con la isla.
Entre las
flexibilizaciones planteadas por la nueva política de Obama está la eliminación
del requisito de “dinero efectivo por adelantado” que imponía el Departamento
del Tesoro para efectuar las ventas a Cuba, lo que se convierte, de hecho, en
una suerte de crédito de las instituciones bancarias estadounidenses.
|
CIFRAS ANUALES DE LAS COMPRAS DE CUBA
EN EL MERCADO DE EEUU
|
|||
|
Año |
Alimentos
y P. Agricolas |
Medicinas y P. Medicos
|
% Medicinas del Total
|
|
2001 |
$4,318,906
|
|
*
|
|
2002 |
$138,634,784
|
|
*
|
|
2003 |
$256,901,471
|
$9,416
|
3.5
|
|
2004 |
$391,990,382
|
$468,485
|
0.12
|
|
2005 |
$350,218,040
|
$404,001
|
0.11
|
|
2006 |
$340,433,442
|
$814,866
|
2.3
|
|
2007 |
$437,564,824
|
$436,773
|
0.9
|
|
2008 |
$710,086,323
|
$320,420
|
0.5
|
|
2009 |
$528,482,955
|
$85,408
|
0.02
|
|
2010 |
$366,467,782
|
$226,563
|
0.06
|
|
2011 |
$358,457,389
|
$103,771
|
0.03
|
|
2012 |
$457,318,357
|
$234,718
|
0.05
|
|
2013 |
$348,747,293
|
$2,155,024
|
0.62
|
|
2014 |
$291,258,881
|
$879,267
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL: |
$4,980,880,829
|
$6,138,712
|
0.12
|
AMENPER: Albert (Al) Franken
Ayer les hablé sobre un
posible candidato a la presidencia del partido Demócrata, Vermín Supreme, hoy
les voy a hablar de Al Franken.
Tengo cierta sensación
de complacencia con Al Franken senador del Estado de Massachusetts, a pesar de
su antipática personalidad, porque compartimos el nombre de pila y porque
cuando veo su cara me siento como un galán de película bien parecido.
Al Franken tendría una
magnífica oportunidad de ser el candidato del partido demócrata si hiciera la
campaña correcta, la cual se la voy a sugerir en una amistosa carta a su
oficina de campaña para su beneficio.
Al Franken no tiene el
menor chance si sigue basando su campaña con sus filosofías comunistas y sus
virulentos ataques a los que no piensan como él.
El problema con esto es
que todos los demás candidatos demócratas ya están haciendo esto, así que
tiene mucha competencia.
Al Franken debiera
declararse en el defensor de una minoría oprimida.
Esto le dio resultado a
Obama con los negros Hillary Clinton con las mujeres de Estados Unidos (no de
las musulmanas).
Al Franken pertenece a
una minoría oprimida que está clamando por un líder, y el pudiera ser ese
líder.
Gay, negros, mujeres,
hispanos, viejos, gordos, flacos, transversistas, y
otras minorías que no recuerdo, todos pueden reclamar sus derechos cuando son
discriminados, todos menos una minoría olvidada….los feos, y son muchos.
Hay más casos de abusos
a los feos en los centros de trabajos que abusos sexuales, pero nunca hemos
visto a un feo presentando una demanda por haber sido abusado por ser feo.
Al Franken pudiera ser
el mesías de los feos. Los feos son la minoría
más oprimida de la humanidad. Nadie quiere ser feo,
todo el mundo se ríe de los feos.
Si una fea está
aplicando a un trabajo contra una bonita, si la fea tiene cierta inteligencia,
solo le servirá para darse cuenta que no le dieron el trabajo porque era
fea, que fue discriminada por su fealdad.
Hay más discriminación
en los centros de trabajos contra los feos que por raza, género o país de
origen. Si hay un dependiente de tienda feo y otro bien parecido,
el cliente prefiere al bien parecido, lo mismo en todos los aspectos de la
vida.
Si Al Franken se
convierte en el líder de los feos, lograría una gran cantidad de votos de
ciudadanos de ambos partidos, hasta habría conservadores feos que votarían por
él a pesar de su pensamiento socialista.
Al Franken por sus ideas
marxistas tiene un precedente intelectual en Lenin, la frase de Lenin
“Proletarios del Mundo Uníos” pudiera ser adoptada por Franken como “Feos del
mundo Uníos”, hay muchos feos y todos se sienten oprimidos y abandonados.
La única oportunidad de
conseguir trabajo de una fea sobre una bonita, es cuando la esposa del jefe es
la que escoge la secretaria del esposo. Eso es lo mismo que la
limitación racial cuando los negros tenían ventaja en el trabajo de recogedor
de basura o los mejicanos que tienen ventaja recogiendo tomates.
Al Franken pudiera
establecer una ley de acción afirmativa para los feos, todos los centros de
trabajo tendrían que tener su cuota de feos, y la aceptación en las
universidades tendría que darle preferencia a los alicantes también por su
fealdad. Las revistas tendrían que poner su cuota de mujeres y
hombres feos en sus portadas, los anuncios comerciales y las estaciones de
televisión tendrían que tener su cuota para que los feos fueran representados.
Se pudieran hacer
marchas de feos a Washington pidiendo sus derechos, y Franken se convertiría en
el nuevo Martin Luther King de los feos.
Sin lugar a dudas, no
hay un político más indicado que Al Franken para este liderazgo. Al igual que Obama
fue el primer presidente Negro, Franken pudiera ser
considerado el primer presidente de una fealdad absoluta en la historia de
Estados Unidos.
Observen la foto
de Al Franken, no por un largo tiempo porque se pueden vomitar y dañar el
teclado de la computadora, pero tírenle una mirada rápida y verán que es el
político más indicado para esta agenda.
Iran Hawks See a Possible Conspiracy in Menendez Corruption Leak
A Democratic senator is hit with corruption charges. A Republican
governor stands ready to replace the senator if he resigns. On paper, it's easy
to imagine the troubles of New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez setting up a
partisan power struggle.
That's not how the Menendez story is playing out. On Friday
afternoon, after CNN broke the news that the Department of Justice was
preparing a case against Menendez, conservatives openly asked if this had
anything to do with the debate over Iran. Menendez, the ranking member of the
Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was wrangling Democrats for a sanctions
bill that the White House had threatened to veto.
Just days before the leak, Menendez was onstage at the AIPAC
conference, winning ovation after ovation. "I am not intimidated by
anyone," said Menendez. Now, to many conservatives, it seemed as though
someone was trying to intimidate him. Bret Stephens, the Pulitzer-winning Wall
Street Journal columnist, reacted quickly and succinctly.
Since, then plenty of pundits have repeated that
sentiment, and leading conservative lawmakers like Ted Cruz have also weighed
in.
How convenient was it that the key Democrat
challenging the administration on Iran, a tough legislator in the final stages
of getting votes for his bill, was hit with credibility-sinking charges. The
question answered itself. The Obama administration, wrote Lee Smith in Tablet,
"took a page from Michael Corleone’s handbook." In Iowa this past
weekend, Texas Senator Ted Cruz openly speculated about a DOJ hit on
Menendez.
"The timing is curious," he told reporters. The charges
raised "suggestions to other Democrats if you dare part
from [the] Obama White House that criminal prosecutions will be used
potentially as a weapon against you as well."
After a Monday morning speech in New Hampshire, South Carolina
Senator Lindsey Graham told Bloomberg Politics that the Menendez allegations
did not sit right with him.
"All I can say is, they were leaked," Graham said.
"He wasn't actually charged officially. They leaked the fact that he may
be charged, is gonna be charged. I hate it when that happens for anybody. I
like Bob. Like everybody else, he's innocent until proven guilty. He's been a
champion on the Iranian nuclear issue. It just doesn't smell right."
Asked if he thought there was political pressure on the DOJ to embarrass Menendez, Graham said he didn't know. "I just know that leaking a potential indictment now–leaking it all, he doesn't deserve that," he said. "No American deserves that. Reading in the paper that you're going to be indicted, that's not how the system works. I'm just disgusted with the whole process."
Asked if he thought there was political pressure on the DOJ to embarrass Menendez, Graham said he didn't know. "I just know that leaking a potential indictment now–leaking it all, he doesn't deserve that," he said. "No American deserves that. Reading in the paper that you're going to be indicted, that's not how the system works. I'm just disgusted with the whole process."
Reached Monday morning, the Justice Department declined to
comment.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/menendez-iran-conspiracy-charges/2015/03/09/id/629040/#ixzz3Tv2EHSu2
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/menendez-iran-conspiracy-charges/2015/03/09/id/629040/#ixzz3Tv2EHSu2
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
CALL TO ACTION! PLEASE CALL THESE LEGISLATORS IN WEST
VIRGINIA NOW!
|
7:57 PM (13 hours ago)
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Created
with NationBuilder, the
essential toolkit for leaders.
Ex-Navy SEAL: We'll Help Get Hillary's Benghazi Emails
The president of Operations Security (OPSEC), a
non-partisan advocacy group of ex-Special Operations Forces officers, has
vowed to assist Congress in uncovering Hillary Clinton's emails pertaining to
the Benghazi attack.
"From Day One, we've been working to get the truth out to the American people and we're not going to stop until it happens," retired Navy SEAL Scott Taylor said Monday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
Note: Watch
Newsmax TV now on DIRECTV Ch. 349 and DISH Ch. 223
Get Newsmax TV on your cable system – Click Here Now Taylor says his grassroots organization has offered assistance to Rep. Trey Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican heading the House's select committee investigating the 2012 Benghazi attack, in which Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans died.
"Trey Gowdy is a very methodical, meticulous
guy and he was very clear …. we're going to leave no stone unturned … we're
going to get to the truth, we're going to uncover every single thing,"
Taylor said.
"I have a lot of confidence in him and his ability to do so, and eventually it will come out … Ultimately, it's going to happen." Taylor has little confidence that Clinton — who The New York Times last week revealed used a private email account to conduct government business — will release all of her emails on her own. "There should've been a third party that went through these emails years ago. It needs to happen now. Hopefully, everything is still there on the server," he said. "This shines a spotlight on who Hillary Clinton is and it will hurt her chances. However, I will say she's still very strong politically and it doesn't mean that it's going to sink her — but once the truth comes out, it will … "At the minimum, it's irresponsible, at the maximum … there are some legal problems that she has here. But it's important that she comes clean and lets an independent investigator come and forensically check that hard drive to make sure there aren't any emails that are missing, which as Congressman Gowdy says there are." Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Scott-Taylor-Hillary-Clinton-email-scandal/2015/03/09/id/629127/#ixzz3TzVPUzaF Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now! |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The
Top 7 Hillary Clinton Lies That The Liberal Media’s Trying To Hide…
Hillary's
record for honesty and ethical behavior has always been less than impeccable.
Hillary Clinton. Wife of an impeached president. Failed
Secretary of State. All around ornery old lady. Plus, of course, a liar. Her
husband gets caught with his pants down, she gets caught with her pants-suit
on. What a lovely couple they make.
This week, we learned that Hillary Clinton used her
own personal email account to conduct official business rather than a public,
archivable .gov account – in direct violation of a 2009 Federal Law. Not only would this make
her emails unavailable for public scrutiny, but it allows the former first lady
to pick and choose what emails she releases to us – if any. So
essentially… Chinese and Russian hackers are probably fully aware of Hillary’s
activities as Secretary of State, while we the people are not.
But Hillary’s record for honesty and ethical behavior has always
been less than impeccable. Let’s take a walk down memory lane with 7 of
Hillary’s biggest lies…
1.
Chelsea Clinton was jogging
around the World Trade Center on 9/11. Immensely insensitive to those who actually were affected
by this horrific attack, Hillary later admitted that Chelsea was actually
safely in her Union Square apartment at the time of the attack.
2. She
landed under sniper fire in Bosnia. In true Brian Williams-esque
form, to listen to Hillary’s account, she was ducking and
running in a dramatic M*A*S*H-type arrival scene in fear for her life. In
actuality, she and Chelsea can be seen on video walking across the
Bosnian tarmac… smiling and greeting well-wishers. But hey, anybody could
misremember deadly sniper fire, right?
3.
She was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, one of the first two men
to climb Mt. Everest. This one’s just embarrassing. Sir Hillary didn’t actually
climb Mt. Everest (AKA, achieve any fame worth naming a child
after) until Hillary Clinton was
6 years old. Ouch. So either Hillary’s mom was lying about her namesake
Hillary’s entire life, or she waited until Hillary was 6 to name her,
or Hillary just, you know, misspoke. Again
4.
Her family was dead broke when they left the White House. They only made $12
MILLION the year after Bill Clinton’s presidency. I guess when you’re used to
the taxpayers’ billions funding your vacations, private airfare, and security,
food, housing, and all, a measly few million could be a rough adjustment, huh?
5.
She claims to have been instrumental in the Northern Ireland peace process. Except those who actually were at the negotiating table say Hillary
was nowhere to be seen…
6.
She’s just like you. No, really. Because
every woman in America has one child who’s always attended private schools, was
married to a president, had a personal chef, flies in an environment-polluting
personal jet, and makes about $200K for every
speaking engagement. Duh.
7.
Benghazi – it was a disgusting video! The worst of the worst. We know for a fact, based on State
Department documents, that not only was Benghazi a terrorist attack, but
Hillary knew it was a
terrorist attack which had absolutely
nothing to do with a YouTube video. Not only did she lie about Benghazi, she failed to act in
response to the attack, and four American lives were lost in the conflict.
But, at this point, what difference does it make, right? What
difference does any of this make?
Sound off in the comments below!
by Krystal Heath and Steven Crowder from LouderWithCrowder.com
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/top-7-hillary-clinton-lies-liberal-medias-trying-hide/#6yUWTofFPZpbZ1mz.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/top-7-hillary-clinton-lies-liberal-medias-trying-hide/#6yUWTofFPZpbZ1mz.99
Intelligence Report: 116 Ex-Gitmo Detainees Went Back to
Battlefield
A new report from Director of National Intelligence
James Clapper claims 116 detainees released from Guantanamo Bay have returned
to the terror battlefield.
The report says 116 of 647 former detainees are "confirmed of re-engaging," a rate of 17.9 percent.
Another 69 former detainees, which amounts to 10.7 percent, are "suspected of re-engaging."
Based on those findings, the report concludes that some detainees released from the prison camp on Cuba will try to return to their lives as terrorists once they are transferred out of the prison known as Gitmo.
The report says 116 of 647 former detainees are "confirmed of re-engaging," a rate of 17.9 percent.
Another 69 former detainees, which amounts to 10.7 percent, are "suspected of re-engaging."
Based on those findings, the report concludes that some detainees released from the prison camp on Cuba will try to return to their lives as terrorists once they are transferred out of the prison known as Gitmo.
"Based on trends identified during the past 11
years, we assess that some detainees currently at GTMO will seek to re-engage
in terrorist or insurgent activities after they are transferred," the
report reads. "Transfers to countries with ongoing conflicts and internal
instability as well as active recruitment by insurgent and terrorist
organizations pose particular problems.
"While enforcement of transfer conditions may deter re-engagement by many former detainees and delay re-engagement by others, some detainees who are determined to re-engage will do so regardless of any transfer conditions, albeit probably at a lower rate than if they were transferred without conditions."
The report says 110 detainees had returned to the fight before Jan. 22, 2009, while another six did the same between that date and Jan. 15, 2015.
The briefing promises to declassify an updated copy of the report "not less frequently than once every six months."
Of the 116 detainees who are confirmed to have returned to terrorism, 25 are now dead, 23 are in custody, and 68 are not in custody.
"While enforcement of transfer conditions may deter re-engagement by many former detainees and delay re-engagement by others, some detainees who are determined to re-engage will do so regardless of any transfer conditions, albeit probably at a lower rate than if they were transferred without conditions."
The report says 110 detainees had returned to the fight before Jan. 22, 2009, while another six did the same between that date and Jan. 15, 2015.
The briefing promises to declassify an updated copy of the report "not less frequently than once every six months."
Of the 116 detainees who are confirmed to have returned to terrorism, 25 are now dead, 23 are in custody, and 68 are not in custody.
Of the 69 suspected of returning to the battlefield,
two are dead, 12 are in custody, and 55 are not in custody.
One prisoner released from Gitmo in 2007 was confirmed to have returned to the battlefield as a recruiter for the Islamic State (ISIS).
Mullah Abdul Rauf switched allegiances from the Taliban to ISIS, the terror group currently occupying much of Iraq and Syria. However, he was killed in a U.S. military drone strike last month.
President Barack Obama has pushed hard to close the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, which means detainees there must either be tried in the U.S. court system or released. As of January, there were just 127 prisoners left in the camp that once held 680 in the years immediately after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Many Republicans want the prison camp to remain open for business and filled with suspected terrorists. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas took that a step further last month, saying the U.S. should punish any ally that helps Gitmo transfers resettle once they are released.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Gitmo-released-detainees-return/2015/03/09/id/629157/#ixzz3TzWA6v82
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
One prisoner released from Gitmo in 2007 was confirmed to have returned to the battlefield as a recruiter for the Islamic State (ISIS).
Mullah Abdul Rauf switched allegiances from the Taliban to ISIS, the terror group currently occupying much of Iraq and Syria. However, he was killed in a U.S. military drone strike last month.
President Barack Obama has pushed hard to close the Guantanamo Bay prison camp, which means detainees there must either be tried in the U.S. court system or released. As of January, there were just 127 prisoners left in the camp that once held 680 in the years immediately after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.
Many Republicans want the prison camp to remain open for business and filled with suspected terrorists. Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas took that a step further last month, saying the U.S. should punish any ally that helps Gitmo transfers resettle once they are released.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Gitmo-released-detainees-return/2015/03/09/id/629157/#ixzz3TzWA6v82
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!
VETERANS GROUP WANTS TO KNOW: WHAT IS
HILLARY HIDING?
RELEASE
YOUR EMAILS NOW!
Eight months ago, Veterans for a Strong America,
with the assistance of top national security attorney Mark Zaid, filed a
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request with the State Department seeking all of Hillary’s
Clinton’s correspondence, including her email and phone records BOTH PRIVATE
AND GOVERNMENTAL.
Veterans for a Strong America’s
FOIA request was clear:
Will
you help us? Can you make an immediate contribution of $10 or $25 or more right
away to support VSA’s efforts to uncover what else Hillary is hiding on her
private email server?
Guess what the State Department
did after it received our request? No, they didn’t deny our request – they
ignored it!
Now, we’ve discovered that
Hillary’s private email server contains classified national security
information that
was hacked into. Hillary’s reckless conduct has helped our enemies and hurt our
country. But you know how it goes for the Clintons – they are above the law and
beyond reproach…until now.
It won’t be easy suing the
federal government in order to expose Hillary for what she is – but it’s the
right thing to do. Serving in Iraq as an Army Infantry Platoon Leader chasing
terrorists down wasn’t easy either – but it was the right thing to do!
WE
WANT ANSWERS! HELP US FUND THE LAWSUIT THAT WILL UNRAVEL HER PRESIDENTIAL
ASPIRATIONS. DON’T LEAVE THIS EFFORT TO THE G.O.P. OR THE REPUBLICAN PARTY –
THEY DON’T HAVE THE GUTS TO FIGHT AGAINST AMERICA’S ENEMIES – VETERANS FOR A
STRONG AMERICA DOES!
During her entire career,
Hillary has used and abused the system: She was fired from the Watergate
investigation, exposed by special prosecutors as obstructing the Travelgate
investigation, treated uniformed members of the military serving in the White
House as second rate citizens, lied about being shot at by a sniper in Bosnia
and when asked about her involvement in leaving four American heroes dead on
the streets of Benghazi, she famously shrieked: “What difference at this point
does it make!”
The leadership of Veterans for
a Strong America is comprised of combat tested warriors that have fought on the
battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan. I can personally assure you that this
organization will go the distance to take down Hillary Clinton.
For America,
Joel Arends
Chairman
Veterans for a Strong America
Chairman
Veterans for a Strong America
WATCH:
What 47 Senators Just Did Could Throw A HUGE Wrench Into Obama’s Big Plan
Stand by for Obama's White House to blow its top...
Less
than a week after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu swatted a political
hornets’ nest with his address to Congress in which he called the Obama
administration’s emerging nuclear arrangement with Iran a “very bad deal” that
“paves the way” to their getting the bomb, here comes another “bomb” of sorts
from Senate Republicans.
Pushing
back hard against the Obama administration, forty-seven GOP senators have
signed an open letter to the Iranian regime offering a lesson in how the U.S.
system of government functions under the Constitution. The letter advises Iran
that any deal concerning Tehran’s nuclear program that President Obama agrees
to without Senate consent could die when Obama leaves office.
As The Hill reports, the letter that was
spearheaded by freshman Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas advises the Iranians
that “anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement” — an
agreement that could well be changed or voided altogether when there’s a new
executive in the White House.
“The
next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a
pen and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time,”
they wrote.
It
wasn’t just newcomers to the upper chamber who signed the letter to Iran.
Adding their signatures to the document were Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
and, according to The Hill article: “It was also signed by four Republicans who
are said to be considering a run for president: Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.), Sen.
Rand Paul (Ky.), Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) and Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.).”
And
as The Times of Israel notes, the GOP Senators’ letter is not
just an advisory to Tehran, it is also a strong message to the White
House.
“…the
latest effort to pressure the Obama administration into granting Congress some
oversight over the nuclear negotiations and emerging agreement….”
By
clicking on the video above, you can see the Fox News interview with the
letter’s primary author, Sen. Tom Cotton, who also explains to Brian Kilmeade
why he believes Iran is a far greater threat than ISIS is to America and the
rest of the free world.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-47-senators-just-throw-huge-wrench-obamas-big-plan/#L3tRVGcwmAefgqal.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-47-senators-just-throw-huge-wrench-obamas-big-plan/#L3tRVGcwmAefgqal.99
DAILY EVENTS
Clinton e-mail scandal
disqualifies her for president
After one of the coldest weeks in
history for the first week of March, a chill has hit Team Hillary.
Conservatives are mining for the anti-Jeb Bush candidate to wrestle the
Republican nomination away from Team Bush. The inevitability of another
President Clinton or President Bush is in grave doubt – and for very different
reasons.
Hillary
campaign hit by blizzard of allegations
Hillary Clinton is in big trouble and
she has likely disqualified herself from the presidency. She is guilty of rank
hypocrisy and appears to have violated the law.
Back in 2007, during Clinton’s last
failed attempt to recapture the White House for the Clinton family, she spoke
at a conference titled Take Back America sponsored by the Campaign for
America’s Future. At the conference, Clinton attacked the President George W.
Bush administration for violating “everything our Founders were afraid of.”
What is Hillary
Clinton’s Worst Scandal?
She bellowed to the
adoring liberal crowd “our Constitution is being shredded. We know about the
secret wiretaps, we know about the secret military tribunals, the secret White
House e-mail accounts.” On all scores, Hillary Clinton has been complicit in
these same offenses against the Constitution when imposed by Democrats.
Clinton was nowhere to be
found when members of both parties complained about the NSA wiretapping scandal
conducted by President Obama.
Clinton has yet to
denounce President Obama for maintaining a kill list of American citizens
without providing them any due process.
She not only did not
denounce Obama Administration officials from maintaining secret e-mail accounts
— she set one up herself.
This is a classic case of
partisan doublespeak. Hillary Clinton is not to be trusted.
This scandal may be the
end of her political career because if you look closely at the allegations, it
is clear that Hillary Clinton took actions to conceal official communications
from the federal government department that she ran — the State Department and
the American people.
The New
York Times reported
that “as State Department lawyers sifted last summer through a new batch of
documents related to the Benghazi attacks, they repeatedly saw something that
caught their attention: e-mails sent to and from a personal account for Hillary
Clinton.” In response, Clinton had her lawyers send over boxes full of
e-mails and “roughly 900 pages pertaining to the Benghazi attacks” were
produced.
The big question is what
was not produced. We know that the most important documents and e-mails will
never be produced. This is a scandal of epic proportions.
Maybe it is time for
former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Vice
President Joe Biden to fire up a campaign apparatus, because this scandal could
be the end of Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions.
Jeb Bush
When talking about the
political dynasty of the Clinton’s, only Jeb Bush and his family have a
superior divine right to occupy the White House.
And Jeb Bush has been
acting like it.
Many conservatives have
concerns about Bush’s position on issues ranging from federally run education
to immigration, yet conservatives will be less forgiving of his record as
Governor of Florida.
According to Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute, “like George W. Bush,
Jeb was good on taxes, but apparently not so good on spending. Jeb Bush was in
office from 1999 to 2007. Florida general fund spending increased from $18.0
billion to $28.2 billion during those eight years, or 57 percent. Total state
spending increased from $45.6 billion to $66.1 billion, or 45 percent.”
And with Jeb Bush getting
the old Bush foreign policy team together, we can expect a Jeb Bush Administration
to be good on tax policy, yet pushing expensive nation building, more No Child
Left Behind/Common Core nonsense and an expansive view of the responsibility of
the federal government to pay for everything.
Sounds familiar and if
Republicans want to have a third term of President George W. Bush and his Wall
Street bail outs, expansion of Medicare programs, creation of a new federal
department and more federal government interference in local education
decisions, then many liberty loving voters may stay home this next election.
Anti-Jeb Bush Candidate
Candidates are emerging to
stop a Jeb Bush coronation.
Wisconsin Governor Scott
Walker has had a few good weeks including a very well received speech at the
Conservative Political Action Conference. The latest McClatcy/Marist poll
has Walker as the leader of the anti-Jeb pack. Real Clear Politics
has Walker beating Bush.
Fox News has Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) as the leader of
the Senate presidential candidates edging out Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Ted
Cruz (R-TX). Nobody really believes that Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is anything
but a messaging candidate so he can pontificate about how he would execute a
more aggressive war on terror.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike
Huckabee is doing very well in national polls and is sneaking up on Walker in
Iowa polls. And Dr. Ben Carson is proving to be a non-conventional
candidate who attracts those who are sick and tired of career politicians
occupying the White House.
Although it is early, the
divine right of Clinton and Bush may be snowed out by a number of emerging and
exciting candidates. The e-mail scandal hitting Hillary like a blizzard of
controversy may freeze her out of politics and knock her out early.
Obama Just Did What Every World
Dictator Failed To Do
|
“En mi opinión”
No comments:
Post a Comment