No 419 6/2513 “En mi opinión” Lázaro R
González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE TRUST’ ¡ obama deserve to be Impeach!
Niña Siria es atada con cadenas a la ventana de hierro de su casa, para que viera el ASESINATO DE SUS PADRES... Para Aquellos Que Tienen Problemas EN Seguir Los Acontecimientos Y No Saben QUIENES SON LOS BUENOS Y QUIENES LOS MALOS...EN SIRIA... Ricardo Samitier.
He aquí OTRA
prueba más - DE QUÉ LADO ESTÁ OBAMA?
Niña sirio atado con cadenas fue obligada a ver el asesinato de
sus padres por los rebeldes Patrocinados Por Los Estados Unidos... CON EL APOYO TAMBIÉN DE LOS
INFILTRADOS EN EL PARTIDO REPUBLICANO...
De acuerdo a la página de Facebook de la Verdad Sobre Siria, la foto de arriba
es de un niña que vive en el Deir ez-Zor Gobernación en el este de Siria, en la
frontera iraquí. Estaba atado por los miembros del apoyada por
Estados Unidos "Ejército Sirio Libre" - que está
dominado por extranjeros Iraníes, los yihadistas suníes - y la ataron para que
viera como su madre y su padre fueron asesinados por ser chiíes.
Con esa gente y así es como el gobierno de Obama está utilizando
sus dólares de impuestos -. Utilizando que está AYUDANDO A LA
LIBERTAD Lo que constituye una burla (gracias por la información a
Raymond Ibrahim)
According to
Syrian Truth’s Facebook page, the above photo is of a toddler living in the
Deir ez-Zor Governate in eastern Syria, bordering Iraq. She was tied up by
members of the U.S.-supported “Free Syrian Army” — which is dominated by
foreign, Sunni jihadis — and made to watch as her mother and father were killed
for being Shia. Here is how the Obama administration is using your tax dollars
— mockingly in the name of “freedom.” (thanks to Raymond
Ibrahim hat tip Jane)
IRS Chief Admits Improper Screening Went on Until Last Month
Monday, 24
Jun 2013 03:37 PM
The Internal Revenue Service's
screening of groups seeking tax-exempt status was broader and lasted longer
than has been previously disclosed, the new head of the agency said Monday. An
internal IRS document obtained by The Associated Press said that besides
"tea party," lists used by screeners to pick groups for close
examination also included the terms "Israel," ''Progressive" and
"Occupy." The document said an investigation into why specific terms
were included was still underway.
In a conference call with reporters, Danny Werfel said that after becoming acting IRS chief last month, he discovered wide-ranging and improper terms on the lists and said screeners were still using them. He did not specify what terms were on the lists, but said he suspended the use of all such lists immediately.
"There was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum" on the lists, Werfel said. He added that his aides found those lists contained "inappropriate criteria that was in use."
Werfel's comments suggest the IRS may have been targeting groups other than tea party and other conservative organizations for tough examinations to see if they qualify. The agency has been under fire since last month for targeting those groups.
His comments also indicate that the use of inappropriate terms on such lists lasted longer than has been revealed previously. A report last month by a Treasury Department inspector general said agency officials abolished targeting of conservative groups with those lists in May 2012.
Werfel said preliminary results of an examination he has conducted of his agency have so far found no indication of improper screening beyond the IRS offices that examines groups seeking tax-exempt status.
He said he believes there was "insufficient action" by IRS managers to prevent and disclose the problem involving the screening of certain groups, but has discovered no specific clues of misconduct.
"We have not found evidence of intentional wrongdoing by anyone in the IRS or involvement in these matters by anyone outside the IRS," he told reporters.
Werfel's comments came as he released an 83-page report containing his assessments of the embattled agency and initial steps he is taking to make improvements.
The report describes several new procedures the agency is installing to prevent unfair treatment of taxpayers in the future. They include a fast-track process for groups seeking tax-exempt status that have yet to get a response from the IRS within 120 days of applying.
In addition, the top five people in the agency responsible for the tax-exempt status of organizations have been removed, including the former acting commissioner, Steven Miller, whom President Barack Obama replaced with Werfel.
"The IRS is committed to correcting its mistakes, holding individuals accountable as appropriate" and establishing new controls to reduce potential future problems, Werfel told reporters.
Werfel's comments and report drew negative reviews from one of the IRS's chief critics in Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Issa said the review "fails to meaningfully answer the largest outstanding questions about inappropriate inquiries and indefensible delays. As investigations by Congress and the Justice Department are still ongoing, Mr. Werfel's assertion that he has found no evidence that anyone at IRS intentionally did anything wrong can only be called premature."
The IRS has provided congressional committees investigating the agency documents related to the screening problems. He said work was continuing on removing sensitive taxpayer information from those documents, and he said he expects them to be released soon.
Werfel had promised to produce a report within a month of taking over the embattled agency.
Werfel said he briefed Obama and Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew on the report earlier Monday.
In a conference call with reporters, Danny Werfel said that after becoming acting IRS chief last month, he discovered wide-ranging and improper terms on the lists and said screeners were still using them. He did not specify what terms were on the lists, but said he suspended the use of all such lists immediately.
"There was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum" on the lists, Werfel said. He added that his aides found those lists contained "inappropriate criteria that was in use."
Werfel's comments suggest the IRS may have been targeting groups other than tea party and other conservative organizations for tough examinations to see if they qualify. The agency has been under fire since last month for targeting those groups.
His comments also indicate that the use of inappropriate terms on such lists lasted longer than has been revealed previously. A report last month by a Treasury Department inspector general said agency officials abolished targeting of conservative groups with those lists in May 2012.
Werfel said preliminary results of an examination he has conducted of his agency have so far found no indication of improper screening beyond the IRS offices that examines groups seeking tax-exempt status.
He said he believes there was "insufficient action" by IRS managers to prevent and disclose the problem involving the screening of certain groups, but has discovered no specific clues of misconduct.
"We have not found evidence of intentional wrongdoing by anyone in the IRS or involvement in these matters by anyone outside the IRS," he told reporters.
Werfel's comments came as he released an 83-page report containing his assessments of the embattled agency and initial steps he is taking to make improvements.
The report describes several new procedures the agency is installing to prevent unfair treatment of taxpayers in the future. They include a fast-track process for groups seeking tax-exempt status that have yet to get a response from the IRS within 120 days of applying.
In addition, the top five people in the agency responsible for the tax-exempt status of organizations have been removed, including the former acting commissioner, Steven Miller, whom President Barack Obama replaced with Werfel.
"The IRS is committed to correcting its mistakes, holding individuals accountable as appropriate" and establishing new controls to reduce potential future problems, Werfel told reporters.
Werfel's comments and report drew negative reviews from one of the IRS's chief critics in Congress, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.
Issa said the review "fails to meaningfully answer the largest outstanding questions about inappropriate inquiries and indefensible delays. As investigations by Congress and the Justice Department are still ongoing, Mr. Werfel's assertion that he has found no evidence that anyone at IRS intentionally did anything wrong can only be called premature."
The IRS has provided congressional committees investigating the agency documents related to the screening problems. He said work was continuing on removing sensitive taxpayer information from those documents, and he said he expects them to be released soon.
Werfel had promised to produce a report within a month of taking over the embattled agency.
Werfel said he briefed Obama and Treasury Secretary Jacob J. Lew on the report earlier Monday.
Wake Up
Call 2013: obama DHS Prepares For Civil War
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b72_1371575335
Clarence Thomas por Alberto Pérez.
En una ardiente opinión
concurrente el lunes, Clarence Thomas el magistrado de la Corte
dijo que constituía una discriminación de la Universidad de Texas la política
de admisión por acción afirmativa e hizo una comparación del el programa
con la esclavitud y la segregación.
Fïsicamente no se puede ser más negro que
Thomas. Obama parece un blanquito al lado de Thomas.
Pero por su
condición de conservador, los que usan la negrura como una condición de
militancia política, dicen que Thomas no es un verdadero negro, ellos dicen que
Thomas es una galletica Oreo, negra por fuera y blanco por dentro..
Bueno, para
mí es algo bueno, porque me gustan mucho las galleticas Oreo desde que era
niño.
Pero la
realidad es que Thomas es un verdadero negro, un negro que lleva su raza con
honor, no para utilizarla como una excusa para impulsar una agenda.
Los que son
oreos invertidos son los que son blancos por fuera pero que tienen el
alma negra
La posición
de Thomas en cuando a los abusos de acción afirmativas, no son más que un
razonamiento imparcial de un abuso cometido. Cuando hay un abuso no se
puede ser selectivo por el color de la piel del abusado. Cuando una
persona por ser blanco es segregada, los que ejecutan esta segregación son
iguales que los esclavistas y segregacionistas del pasado.
Por esto
Thomas dijo:
"Los esclavistas argumentaban
que la esclavitud era un "bien positivo" y que había civilizado a los
negros y los había mejorado en todas las dimensiones de la vida", Thomas
escribió en su opinión separada en Fisher v. Universidad de Texas en Austin. "Un
siglo más tarde, segregacionistas igualmente afirmaron que la segregación era
no sólo benigno, pero bueno para estudiantes negros."
Thomas había citado Brown v. Board of
Education, el caso de Tribunal Supremo de 1954 de hito que llevó a la
segregación de las escuelas públicas, en la elaboración de una comparación
entre la segregación y la acción afirmativa.
"Vemos que seguir estos pasos es
poco auspicioso, la Universidad nos han hecho creer que su discriminación
además es benigna. Creo que la lección de la historia es bastante clara: nunca
es benigna, la Discriminación Racial”
Escribió en la opinión de 20 páginas.
“Los bienintencionados profesores de la Universidad no puede excusar su
discriminación racial con las mismas justificaciones que argumentaros los
esclavistas y segregacionistas."
Cuando un blanco cuyo hijo fue
víctima de la discriminación a la inversa por su blancura, protesta por la
injusticia, le dicen que es un racista. Pero esta injusticia es una
realidad que vemos en nuestras universidades, como algo beneficioso.
Ahora lo dice un magistrado que es
bien negro, pero también le dicen racista, como le dicen racista a cualquier
negro que no se una a la nueva discriminación política en que usan a los negros
como unos nuevos esclavos para sus agendas.
Palin: Immigration Bill Is a Vote for Amnesty, Not Security
Monday, 24 Jun 2013 08:10 PM By Courtney Coren
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin
criticized the Senate immigration bill for lacking teeth on border security,
going after Florida Sen. Marco Rubio specifically, in a long Facebook post Monday.
Palin detailed several amendments that were presented that she argues would have increased security at the border but were all voted down.
"It's beyond disingenuous for anyone to claim that a vote for the bill is a vote for security," the former Republican vice presidential candidate wrote.
"Look no further than the fact that Senator Rubio and amnesty supporters nixed Senator Thune's amendment that required the feds to finally build part of a needed security fence before moving forward on the status of illegal immigrants who've already broken the law to be here," she said.
She then cited the amendment offered by Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky that made similar demands as Thune's amendment, which was also voted down.
"And if shooting down the border fence wasn't proof enough, they blew another chance by killing Senator Paul's 'Trust But Verify' amendment, which required the completion of a fence in five years and required Congress to vote on whether the border is actually secure before furthering any immigration measures," Palin wrote.
She also criticized the Corker-Hoeven amendment presented last Thursday that would put an additional 20,000 border patrol agents to the border with Mexico 10 years after it is enacted, after certain goals are met.
"Now the Senate's pro-amnesty crowd is offering a fig leaf to security via the Corker-Hoeven Amendment, but this is really nothing more than empty promises," she said. "It's amnesty right now and border security ... eh, well, someday."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/palin-immigration-bill-amnesty/2013/06/24/id/511652?s=al&promo_code=13EF9-1#ixzz2XEPPQSr3
Palin detailed several amendments that were presented that she argues would have increased security at the border but were all voted down.
"It's beyond disingenuous for anyone to claim that a vote for the bill is a vote for security," the former Republican vice presidential candidate wrote.
"Look no further than the fact that Senator Rubio and amnesty supporters nixed Senator Thune's amendment that required the feds to finally build part of a needed security fence before moving forward on the status of illegal immigrants who've already broken the law to be here," she said.
She then cited the amendment offered by Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky that made similar demands as Thune's amendment, which was also voted down.
"And if shooting down the border fence wasn't proof enough, they blew another chance by killing Senator Paul's 'Trust But Verify' amendment, which required the completion of a fence in five years and required Congress to vote on whether the border is actually secure before furthering any immigration measures," Palin wrote.
She also criticized the Corker-Hoeven amendment presented last Thursday that would put an additional 20,000 border patrol agents to the border with Mexico 10 years after it is enacted, after certain goals are met.
"Now the Senate's pro-amnesty crowd is offering a fig leaf to security via the Corker-Hoeven Amendment, but this is really nothing more than empty promises," she said. "It's amnesty right now and border security ... eh, well, someday."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/palin-immigration-bill-amnesty/2013/06/24/id/511652?s=al&promo_code=13EF9-1#ixzz2XEPPQSr3
Se rumora sobre otro negocio al estilo Marlins Park
une 25th, 2013
• Las vistas están fijas sobre lo que pueda ocurrir con Scotty’s Landing adyacente al Ayuntamiento de Miami
MIAMI, 25 DE JUNIO DE 2013, NHR.com—En NHR.com hemos
informado sobre el famoso caso de Scotty’s Landing, el viejo restaurante
ubicado dentro de una propiedad priviligiada adyacente al Ayuntamiento de
Miami. Fue un reportaje publicado por NHR,com del pasado año cuando se dio
cuenta de la enorme deuda de más de $2 millones en impuestos sobre la propiedad
que los administradores de Scottys se negaban a pagar, y esto alertó a la
administración de Miami y al alcalde Tomás Regalado que tomaron cartas en el
asuntoy junto a los comisionados cancelaron el acuerdo con el propietario de Scottys
Landing, Scott Wessel y han sometido el espacio a licitación.
Pero al parecer con esa resolución
no se podrán terminar los problemas con esa propiedad. Se rumora que un
grupo liderado por el ex alcalde de Miami, Manny Díaz, podrían apoderarse de
esta propiedad pagando una baja suma a la ciudad de Miami.
De acuerdo con fuentes, Díaz y su
grupo tienen algunos aliados en la comisión de Miami y además han cabildeado
con el comité seleccionador encargado de recomendar a la comisión el mejor
postor. Por otro lado, hay quienes quieren que se realice una licitación nueva.
NHR.com estará hoy investigando
detalles sobre la reunión del comité seleccionador para poder informar
ampliamente sobre lo que podría convertirse en un controversial contrato al
estilo de los negocios hechos con estadio de los Miami Marlins o la American
Airlines Arena.
“EN
MI OPINION” LA MISMA MIERDA CON LOS MISMOS MIERDA. Lázaro
R González Miño {Disculpen la expresión tan soez, pero era lo menos que podía decir}
¡Sólo Verdades!
¿Por qué no dudar de los que dudan?
23 de junio de
2013
Héctor
Lemagne Sandó:.
“La grandeza lastima a los que no son grandes” José Martí
¡Todos tenemos derecho! Tenemos derecho a cuestionar, dudar y
hasta atacar, justa o injustamente, a quienes conocemos y también a los que no
conocemos. Hay ocasiones que los ataques físicos hacen menos daño que los
ataques contra la reputación de las personas. Y más aún cuando se basan en
calumnias. Los físicos se curan en el policlínico, los morales pueden durar
toda una vida. Pero más sufre el que los ejerce que las víctimas. Hay viles que
llevan ya en su negra alma todo el castigo.
El título de este artículo no es mío. Por casualidad lo mencionó un
amigo de mi padre durante estas controversiales conversaciones en que nos vemos
envueltos los cubanos que tratamos de hacer, a nuestra manera lo que
podamos, por que Cuba recobre su libertad. Muchas personas han expuesto
opiniones, a favor y en contra de los disidentes y opositores que han viajado
por el mundo denunciando al régimen castrista. En programas radiales, y de TV.
Pero sobre todo en Internet se han hecho serias acusaciones contra esos
cubanos. Internet que tiene tremenda influencia, por eso el castrismo no lo
permite en Cuba. Voy a tratar de ser lo más claro posible, porque aquí también
hay personas que le huyen a temas controversiales “por no buscarse problemas,”
por pusilánimes, o por pendejos. Bienvenidos sean los problemas siempre y
cuando se exponga la razón, la verdad y la justicia. Muchos no ignoran que en
el exilio cubano existen quienes han convertido la causa de la libertad de Cuba
en una industria protagónica, económica y más. ¡Viven de Cuba en lugar de
vivir para Cuba! Y nadie los toca ni con el pétalo de una rosa. Hace
muchos años que le he perdido el respeto a estos personajes, y cada vez son
más.
Con las giras que por el mundo han hecho algunos opositores, estos
“intocables” la han emprendido contra ellos con más saña que el Granma y los
defensores de los mismos dictadores Fidel y Raúl Castro. Buscan los defectos
con lupas de alto calibre, e inventan historias para seguir reinando como los
libertadores en el exilio. ¡Basta! Son tan burdos y hasta
estúpidos esos ataques que muchos en el exilio, empezando por mí, ya dudan del
patriotismo de estos inefables “lideres.” Pero ahora también atacan a quienes
exponen respetuosamente el criterio que se tiene respecto a esos opositores. Yo
particularmente no voy a permitir que estos demagogos, atartufados, mediocres y
egocentristas insulten la inteligencia con tal impunidad y tan descaradamente. ¡Y
menos que me insulten a mí! ¡Basta!
Yo quisiera saber qué plan, después de 54 largos años, estos “lideres”
han desarrollado para la libertad, y la democracia en Cuba. Los que han
tenido la oportunidad de levantar sus voces alrededor del mundo, (que siguen
viviendo en Cuba, y que no se van de Cuba) por lo menos han expresado sus
planes, y se les han hecho preguntas de todo tipo.
Déjenme recordarle algo a los que me conocen, y a los que no sépanlo.
Quien escribe es Mason desde antes de nacer y lo será después de morir. El
único masón en el mundo que ha sido suspendido tres veces. Por denunciar
que Collera Vento, y otros impostores que han dividido la masonería en el
exilio colaboraban con Seguridad del Estado cubano. ¡Qué casualidad! Quiero
aclarar, que no tengo ningún interés en participar en reuniones, y mucho menos
intercambiar impresiones con estos pseudo-masones. Tampoco con los que
insisten en sostener una discusión sobre el tema con epítetos ofensivos. ¡No
lo necesito! Dudo de su patriotismo.
¡También dudo del patriotismo de todos los que, buscando más protagonismo,
han atacado a nuestros Hermanos que han levantado sus voces alrededor del mundo
respecto a la santa causa de la libertad de Cuba! A ellos sólo los
conocen en su casa a la hora del almuerzo. ¡Si acaso!
Los Obispos CATÓLICOS De USA. Han Pedido 15 Días De Oraciones Por La Libertad
Religiosa... Lo Primero Que tienen Que hacer los Obispos
Católicos... Es Practicar Con El Ejemplo... Ricardo
Samitier.
Cumpliendo Con Su Deber Y Excomulguen A Los “Empedernidos
Pecadores Católicos” En El Congreso Que Apoyan El Aborto... Comenzando
Por John Kerry Y La Nancy Pelosi Y Los Cientos Que Se Dicen “Católicos” A
La Hora De Pedir Votos...
Unámonos A Sus Rezos... Pero Pidiendo Que Dios Llene De Valor A Los
Obispos...
He Aquí La Petición De Los Obispos...
Arzobispo Chaput dijo
que es mejor despertar.
¿Por qué?
Él escribió: "La
última fealdad IRS es un indicio del tratamiento desaprobados grupos religiosos
pueden enfrentar en el futuro, si dormimos a través de la discusión nacional de
la libertad religiosa ahora."
Como católicos que aman
la Iglesia y valoran nuestra libertad, nos negamos a dormitar cuando nuestra
libertad está en peligro!
Es por eso que hemos
creado 7 maneras de activar su Quincena por la Libertad!
El derecho a creer, a
seguir a Jesucristo ya su Iglesia sin temor o amenaza, se ha torcido en el
privilegio que se le conceda una "adaptación" de las manos de un
político.
Esta no es la libertad
- es opresión.
Por eso nuestros
Obispos han pedido una "Quincena por la Libertad" - de dos semanas de
oración, el testimonio y la educación públicas para ayudar a cambiar el rumbo y
recuperar nuestra legítima Constitucional y derecho dado por Dios a la libertad
religiosa.
La Quincena comenzó el
viernes pasado, 21 de junio y va hasta el jueves 4 de julio.
Coulter warns GOP will suffer ‘devastating’ consequences if immigration reform passes
On Fox News Channel’s Saturday broadcast of “America’s
News HQ,” Ann Coulter attacked the immigration legislation and questioned why
Republicans, including junior Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, would
support such legislation after
suggesting otherwise during an election.
“[D]emocrats will get 30 million new voters, 80
percent of which, according to all polls, will be voting for the Democrats,”
Coulter said. “Why any Republican would support this — and by the way, it is
kind of striking that Republicans including Marco Rubio don’t support such
amnesties when they are running for office. Oh, no, somehow it is once they get
to Washington, they discover
all of the
unknown bounties for Republicans and amnesty. But Rubio specifically said a
pathway to citizenship is amnesty when he ran against Charlie Crist a couple of
years ago.”
Anchor Uma Pemmaraju asked Coulter, the author of “Mugged: Racial
Demagoguery from the Seventies to Obama,” why Democrats were expressing a sense of urgency in
getting the bill through the Senate before the Fourth of July break.
“This is the way the Democrats always hoodwink, always
snooker the Republicans as they tried to do with gun control,” she said. “‘Oh
come on, you have to be with gun control after Newtown. We are trying to help
you out,
Republicans. Why don’t we schedule the vote for Sunday?’ And the better path
has been let’s think about this. Let’s see what is in the thousand-page bill. I
mean this is another Obamacare-type bill where people don’t know what is in it.
A real immigration bill could be one-page long — enforce E-verify and build a
fence. This idea that the fence is some impossible thing — ‘What do you mean, a
fence? We don’t understand and it will not work.’ You know, fences have worked
all over the world going back hundreds of years.”
Coulter also explained the electoral benefits
for the
Democratic Party should their efforts prove successful, but that it would also
hurt low-wage workers that Democrats seem to be neglecting in their
consideration of immigration reform.
“The Democrats don’t care about making lawbreakers —
first immediately getting them legalized and then a few years later giving them
citizenship because it helps them electorally,” Coulter said. “And don’t be
mistaken. The Democrats do not care about the people. It is generally — they
certainly don’t care about low-wage workers. And that’s who Republicans should
care about. We care about Americans, and low-wage workers are going to be
devastated by bringing in another 30 million very low-wage workers. It’s just
the laws of supply and demand. People will be poorer, especially those without
a high school
education, a
college education. They are already suffering under Obama with massive
unemployment. The last thing we need is another 30 million low-wage workers.”
“And by the way, the reason I say 30 million is, the
estimates now — and I’ll assume they are correct — say we have 11 million
immigrations here,” she continued. “Well, but we have chain migration under
[Sen.] Teddy Kennedy’s 1965 immigration act. So that 11 million can instantly
start bringing in their distant relatives, their brothers-in-law, their second
cousins — which is what happened with [former President Ronald] Reagan’s 1986
amnesty bill, which is why you get the 1986 amnesty bill. In 1988, the
Republican share
of the Hispanic
vote plummeted from 37 percent to 30 percent. A few years later, the last
Republican was elected statewide in California. This is devastating for the
Republican Party, which Republicans should care about. It is also devastating
for the country, which the entire country should care about, especially those
who care about the people who are in the bottom rungs of society.”
http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/22/coulter-warns-gop-will-suffer-devastating-consequences-if-immigration-reform-passes/
http://dailycaller.com/2013/06/22/coulter-warns-gop-will-suffer-devastating-consequences-if-immigration-reform-passes/
Irish MP Blasts President Obama as 'Hypocrite of the Century' President Obama got blasted by Clare Daly, a fiery Irish Member of Parliament. She rips the shameful, sycophantic American media for supporting a ‘war criminal’ and the ‘hypocrite of the century.’ And — she’s a soft socialist.
JUSTICIA
SELECTIVA Alberto Pérez.
Hay un caso
sobre un pastor de Hialeah que está siendo acusado porque está usando una
oficina de un edificio del gobierno para su ministerio con un precio
especial por ser una empresa sin utilidades.
Pero el caso
se trata de que el ministerio como se opone al aborto y el matrimonio
homosexual, y recomienda no votar a los que promueven esto y que voten por los
que se oponen, entonces dicen que no debe tener los privilegios de
exención de impuestos como empresa no lucrativa porque es una institución
política..
Como no tengo
creencias religiosas institucionales, pudiera estar de acuerdo de que las
instituciones religiosas en general estén exentas de impuestos, creo que
si no pueden existir con el dinero con los que contribyen sus miembros no
deben de existir.
Pero esta es
una ley instituida por años, y a mi manera de pensar la única manera que se
puede corregir es con el “Impuesto Justo” (Fair Tax), o sea que nadie pague
impuestos personales, que los impuestos sean cargados a las compras de
artículos que no sean de primera necesidad.
Esto
resolvería esta situación y la mayor parte de los problemas que tenemos, y
sobre todo nos libraríamos de la terrible oficina del IRS.
Aceptando el
hecho de la excención de impuestos es una realidad, lo que no puedo aceptar es
que sea selectiva.
Como en el
caso de los ataques del IRS a los conservadores, pasando por alto los liberales
que se aprovechan de la excención de impuestos. En el caso de la exención a las
instituciones religiosas es la misma situación. Si se atacan a todas las
instituciones religiosas que usan su institución para recomendar a sus miembros
por quien votar, sería justo.
Pero las
iglesias que son más militantes en cuanto a esto son las iglesias negras, que
hasta utilizan ómnibus para llevar sus miembros a votar por los candidatos que
ellos recomiendan, y por alguna razón que no entiendo, o que prefiero no
elaborar como lo entiendo, su exención es intocable.
La justicia
selectiva no es justicia es simplemente hipocresía y por ende INJUSTICIA..
Ancient Egyptian Statue Mysteriously Rotates at
Museum. An ancient Egyptian statue in a British museum has sparked debate after it was captured on
video seemingly rotating on its own.
The 10-inch tall statue of Neb-senu
has been on display at the Manchester Museum in Manchester, England, for 80
years but it was only recently that museum staff noticed the statue moving.
"Most Egyptologists are not superstitious people. I wondered who had
changed the object's position without telling me," the museum's curator, Campbell
Price, told the U.K.'s Sun. "But the next time I looked, it was facing in another
direction-and a day later had yet another orientation."
With his curiosity piqued, Price returned the statue of the Egyptian
idol to its original position in a locked glass case and set up a camera to
film the statue over an 11-hour period. The resulting time-lapse video, Price
says, shows the statue moving on its own.
Other experts attribute the rotation to a more scientific reasoning,
such as subtle vibrations that cause the statue to move.
"The statue only seems to spin
during the day when people are in the museum," Carol Redmount, associate professor of Egyptian archeology at the University of California,
Berkeley, told ABC News. "It could have something to do with its
individual placement and the individual character of the statue."
The statue, made from serpentine, shows what is likely an official with
"priestly duties," according to Price, wearing a shoulder-length wig
and knee-length kilt.
The hieroglyphs on the back of the statue spell out, "bread, beer
and beef," a "prayer for offerings for the spirit of the man,"
Price told the Sun. http://gma.yahoo.com/blogs/abc-blogs/ancient-egyptian-statue-mysteriously-rotates-museum-141331675.html?vp=1
¡Impeach obama!
En caso de que usted no reciba “En mi
opinión” en su e-mail lo puede leer en estos blogs:
5)
http://romelbpaz1.wordpress.com/
Copie estos links porque posiblemente los necesitara
en un futuro para que pueda leer “En mi opinión” si sigue la guerra contra
nuestro sitio web.
“THE FREEDON NEVER IS FREE”
“En
mi opinión” Lázaro
R González Miño Editor ‘IN GOD WE
TRUST’
No comments:
Post a Comment