No 957 “En mi opinión” Mayo 23, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIñO EDITOR
Muchas gracias a Luis Carril que nos ha enviado este trabajo de hace mucho tiempo publicamos, que por su vigencia lo publicamos y lo disfrutamos mucho. Esto me recuerda que estamos a solo 43 números de alcanzar la edición # 1000 de “En mi opinión. Que nació a raíz de que yo presentara el RECALL a Carlos Álvarez, ¿se recuerdan? [Que pena que nadie le ha presentado un recall a Carlos Gimenes por todos los abusos, de los tols y otras muchísimas mentiras como la de “Cielito Lindo” y otras muchas. “En mi opinión” ha sido un esfuerzo 6 años de trabajo y satisfacciones y una prueba de su paciencia y afecto de ustedes. Posiblemente es un buen momento para que algunos de ustedes con muchísima preparación que yo y menos años, que soy un químico y no un escritor o periodista, se hagan cargo de este modesto periódico digital. Es casi un hijo para mí. ¿Así que quien recoge la bandera? LRGM.
Cuando la injusticia se convierte en ley, la rebelión es un deber. Thomas Jefferson.
‘En mi opinión’ “In GOD we trust” Lázaro R González Miño
”Un gobierno demasiado controlador, no es un buen gobierno” Thomas Jefferson.
FEBRERO 12, 2012
GOD BLESSES AMERICA!
Sheriff Joe Arpaio sets “D-Day” March 12, 2012 on Obama's eligibility Faltan solo 16 dias.
Esta informacion fue extraida de la publicacion "Cuba LLora" Por la importancia de su contenido es un placer para mi presentarla en nuestra pagina. Muchas gracias. Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino..
AMENPER: Solución Final para el Conflicto del Medio Oriente
Obama: No estamos perdiendo la guerra contra ISIS – pérdida de Ramadi es sólo un "revés"
Barack Obama dice: "No vamos a perder," la guerra contra ISIS en Irak.
Bueno, Díselo a los refugiados de Ramadi y Palmyra.
Después de ISIS toma Ramadi, Iraq y Palmyra, Siria, Barack Obama insiste en que no vamos a perder.
El presidente Barack Obama ha descrito la pérdida de territorio iraquí al estado islámico como un revés táctico, aunque insistiendo en la guerra contra el grupo yihadista no se está perdiendo.
"No creo que estamos perdiendo", dijo Obama en una entrevista con la revista The Atlantic publicó el jueves, días después fue invadida la ciudad iraquí de Ramadi noticias.
"Hay sin duda hubo un retroceso táctico, aunque Ramadi había estado vulnerable durante mucho tiempo", dijo.
Bueno, quizás este asunto tenga una solución que sea satisfactoria para todas las vertientes políticas en Estados Unidos.
Vamos a analizar la situación:
Desde agosto de 2014, bajo las órdenes de Obama, una coalición encabezada por Estados Unidos ha llegado a más de 6.000 objetivos en Irak y Siria con ataques aéreos, con el objetivo de degradar al grupo estado islámico. Pero esto no parece haber tenido resultado. Obama se ha negado a devolver U.S. tropas de combate a Irak, después de una larga brutal guerra después del derrocamiento de Saddam Hussein.
Pero la derrota en Ramadi ha puesto en cuestión U.S. estrategia y la credibilidad del gobierno central del Iraq.
Obama culpó para esto reveses a la falta de formación y refuerzo de las fuerzas de seguridad de Irak.
"Han estado allí esencialmente por un año sin refuerzos suficientes," dijo el propio Obama.
Claro que este es un problema que podemos solucionar si analizamos bien la situación.
Primero ¿cual es el problema?, ¿que no queremos mandar más tropas de soldados a medio oriente que hay veces que se comportan como criminales nazis según la prensa liberal?
Ok está bien, pero creo que hay una alternativa. Tenemos una fuerza táctica que está teniendo un gran poder en las calles de Estados Unidos. Vemos combatientes en las calles de Fergurson y Baltimore, New York y toda la nación. Quizás a esto sea a lo que Obama se refiere cuando dice que no estamos perdiendo.
Obama pudiera usar esa fuerza para enfrentarse a nuestros enemigos del medio oriente, y con su vitalidad lograríamos un triunfo total. También pudiéramos incluir una brigada de inmigrantes ilegales.
Ese sería el gran legado de Obama.
Vamos a empezar a reclutar combatientes entre los manifestantes, es la solución final. Vamos a resolver el problema del Medio Oriente.
Watch: Krauthammer And Napolitano Team Up To SMASH Obama With Harsh Truth He Doesn’t Want To Hear
“The administration is sounding like Baghdad Bob..."
Fox News analyst Charles Krauthammer asserted the Obama administration was “sounding like Baghdad Bob” after the president said that despite two major recent defeats, he would not change his approach to fighting the war against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS)
ISIS took control of the Iraqi city of Ramadi on Monday and Palmyra in Syria on Thursday. Still, Obama told Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic Tuesday that he does not think the U.S. is losing.
“There’s no doubt there was a tactical setback, although Ramadi had been vulnerable for a very long time, primarily because these are not Iraqi security forces that we have trained or reinforced.” Obama said.
On the panel of Special Report with Bret Baier Thursday, Krauthammer excoriated the president for his contentions. “The administration is sounding like Baghdad Bob during the invasion of Iraq,” Krauthammer said.
They’re losing. Everybody understands that. ISIS — it wasn’t only that they took over in Iraq, but it took over the town of — the city of Palmyra in Syria, which gives it control of half of Syria, and later in the day today, they took over a crucial crossing point between Syria and Iraq, essential erasing the frontier and making it easier to resupply Ramadi.
These are huge strategic gains. They are not tactical defeats, and what Obama says, well it’s not because it wasn’t our — the guys who were trained by us who were in Ramadi. This is nuts. The idea is if you’re going to have success, you have to have training and you have to have will. The idea that what the Iraqis are lacking is training is ridiculous. We’ve been training them for 15 years.
“If the troops haven’t got their heart in the battle, it will not succeed, and that’s what happened in Mosul when they ran away, and that’s what happened in Ramadi when they ran away,” Krauthammer added.
Judge Andrew Napolitano, also on the panel Thursday, agreed. “The president conveys an image of being passive and indecisive, and that leads to an image of defeat. If you’re going to be there, fight to win and come home. If you don’t think we can win it, then we shouldn’t be there,” Napolitano said.
In my view, this cannot be won without a long term commitment of ground troops for a long period of time and nation building. And the American public will not tolerate that politically, and we can’t afford it.
However, what we’re doing now accomplishes nothing. He’s punching with his left hand and apologizing to the galleries with his right for hitting too hard.
h/t: The Daily Caller
Do you agree with Krauthammer and Judge Napolitano? Share your thoughts in the comments section.
Un entrenador de Maine, envió a Barack Obama una nota sobre el Islam ...
Entonces Algo MAJOR SUCEDIÓ (Alarmante!)Maine, langosta no es la única cosa en el agua caliente. De Scott Lees, un entrenador de lacrosse de la escuela secundaria compartió una carta abierta a partir de 2009 al presidente Barack Obama, en la que con razón, puso en duda la afirmación de que la fe islámica siempre ha sido parte de la historia americana. Fue enviado a él por un amigo, y compartió que en Facebook con la esperanza de tener una discusión con los demás.
Dos días más tarde, los partidarios de Obama se aseguró su empleador lo vieron, y los funcionarios de la escuela en Fryeburg Academia le lata!
El entrenador ganó aproximadamente $ 7 / hora porque le encanta entrenar a los niños y fomentar el trabajo en equipo. Pero al parecer, cuando se trabaja como entrenador, usted pierde sus derechos de la Primera Enmienda. Vergonzoso!
Después de cuatro años al frente del equipo de lacrosse de los muchachos de Fryeburg Academia Scott Lees de Conway dijo que fue obligado por los funcionarios de la academia a dimitir como entrenador en jefe después de compartir en Facebook una carta abierta al presidente Barack Obama de que era poco halagüeño para los musulmanes.
La carta, escrita por "un ciudadano estadounidense", estaba a punto el discurso de Obama en El Cairo dada en 2009. En ese discurso y en otro hecho el mes pasado, el presidente dijo que el Islam ha sido durante mucho tiempo una parte de la historia americana.
En la primera parte de la carta, que se pregunta si alguien ha visto alguna vez un hospital musulmán o escuchado una orquesta musulmán. El escritor pasa a cobrar que los musulmanes "siguen siendo los traficantes más grandes de la esclavitud humana", que se aliaron con Adolf Hitler en la Segunda Guerra Mundial y que estaban bien contentos con o silencio sobre los 11 de septiembre 2001, los ataques terroristas. El escritor añade que los piratas berberiscos eran musulmanes.
"Pensé que era un artículo interesante", dijo Lees, quien agregó que es un conservador independiente políticamente afines. "Pensé que era una interesante carta al presidente Obama y su administración actual que no están prestando atención a Israel y centrándose en Irán."
a través de la Conway Daily Sun
He aquí la carta completa, que continúa propagándose de forma viral en Facebook, lleno de críticas legítimas de Obama ...
Estimado Sr. Obama:
¿Alguna vez has visto a un hospital musulmán?
¿Has escuchado una orquesta musulmán?
¿Has visto una marcha banda musulmana en un desfile?
¿Ha sido testigo de una organización de caridad musulmana?
¿Has visto los musulmanes Shak [ing] manos con musulmanes Girl Scouts?
¿Has visto un Striper de caramelo musulmán?
Han visto el musulmán haga nada que contribuye positivamente a la forma de vida americana ????
La respuesta es no, no lo ha hecho. Simplemente pregúntese ¿POR QUÉ ???
Eran aquellos musulmanes que estaban en Estados Unidos cuando los peregrinos primero aterrizaron? Es curioso, yo pensé que eran los indios nativos americanos.
¿Fueron los musulmanes que celebraba el primer día de Acción de Gracias? Lo siento de nuevo, esos eran peregrinos y los indios nativos americanos.
¿Me puede mostrar una firma musulmana en la Constitución de los Estados Unidos? Declaración de Independencia? Declaración de Derechos? No lo creo.
¿Se musulmanes luchan por la libertad de este país desde Inglaterra? No.
¿Se musulmanes luchan durante la Guerra Civil para liberar a los esclavos en los Estados Unidos? No, no lo hicieron. De hecho, los musulmanes en la actualidad siguen siendo los traficantes más grandes de la esclavitud humana. Su propio hermanastro, un musulmán devoto, todavía defiende a sí mismo la esclavitud, a pesar de que los musulmanes de ascendencia árabe se refieren a los musulmanes negros como "esclavos nariz pug." Dice mucho de lo que el mundo musulmán realmente piensa de la herencia islámica rica de su familia ", "¿no es Obama?
¿Dónde estaban los musulmanes durante la era de los derechos civiles de este país? No presente. No hay imágenes o cuentas de redes de musulmanes caminando al lado de Martin Luther King, Jr. o ayudar a hacer avanzar la causa de los Derechos Civiles.
¿Dónde estaban los musulmanes durante la era del sufragio de la mujer de este país? Una vez más, no se presentará. De hecho, los musulmanes devotos exigen que las mujeres están subordinadas a los hombres en la cultura islámica. Tanto es así, que a menudo son golpeados por no llevar el 'hajib "o para hablar con un hombre que no es un familiar directo o su marido. Sí, los musulmanes son todos de los derechos de las mujeres, ¿no es cierto?
¿Dónde estaban los musulmanes durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial? Estaban alineados con Adolf Hitler. El Gran Mufti musulmanes mismo se reunió con Adolf Hitler, revisaron las tropas y aceptaron el apoyo de los nazis en matar Judios.
Por último, el Sr. Obama, ¿dónde estaban los musulmanes en 11 de septiembre 2001? Si no volaban aviones en el World Trade Center, el Pentágono o en un campo en Pennsylvania matando a casi 3.000 personas en nuestro propio suelo, que se regocijaban en el Medio Oriente.
Nadie puede discutir las imágenes que se muestran de todas partes del mundo musulmán celebra en la CNN, Fox News, MSNBC y otras redes de noticias por cable de ese día. Extrañamente, los musulmanes muy "moderados" ¿Quién es usted asnas hizo lo imposible para besar en El Cairo, Egipto el 4 de junio eran piedra fría posterior silencio 9-11. Para muchos estadounidenses, su silencio ha supuesto la aprobación de los actos de ese día.
Y eso, señor Obama, es el "rico patrimonio" musulmanes tienen aquí en Estados Unidos ...
Oh, lo siento, me olvidé de mencionar los piratas berberiscos. Eran musulmanes.
Y ahora podemos añadir un 5 noviembre de 2009 - la masacre de soldados americanos en Fort Hood por un importante musulmana, un médico y un psiquiatra, que se suponía iba a ser el asesoramiento soldados que regresan de combate en Irak y Afganistán.
Eso, señor Obama es la "herencia musulmana" en Estados Unidos!
PD Ahora, usted puede agregar los atentados de Maratón de Boston, en Texas y en varios otros lugares, también ...
H / T: The Scoop derecho
¿Qué opinas del tratamiento de este entrenador de la crosse? Por favor déjenos un comentario y dinos lo que piensas.
Obama’s New Claim About His Support For Israel Will Either Make You Laugh Or Cry
Netanyahu sees an existential threat to his nation.
In an interview Thursday and in a speech at a prominent synagogue on Friday, President Obama stated his full support for Israel; but his actions in recent months raise questions.
During a lengthy interview with Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic, the president said: “There’s a direct line between supporting the right of the Jewish people to have a homeland and to feel safe and free of discrimination and persecution, and the right of African Americans to vote and have equal protection under the law. These things are indivisible in my mind.”
Goldberg found Obama’s sentiments moving, but the writer has been a strong supporter of the president for years–going as far as calling him the first Jewish president during his re-election campaign in 2012.
Obama re-iterated his support for the Jewish state in an address at Adas Israel Synagogue in northwest Washington, D.C., on Friday, marking the inaugural “solidarity sabbath.” The holiday is meant to consolidate support for Jews amid rising anti-Semitism in Europe and worldwide. A report released in March found 2014 to be the worst year for violent anti-Semitic incidents in a decade.
The president told the congregation: “When we allow anti-Semitism to take root, our souls are destroyed.”
Obama went on: “When I hear some people say that disagreements over policy belie a general lack of support of Israel, I must object – and I object forcefully.” But, he said he was unwilling to “paper over differences.”
“It is precisely because I care so deeply about the state of Israel,” he said, “that I feel a responsibility to speak out honestly about what I think would lead to long-term security and to the preservation of a true democracy in the Jewish homeland, and I believe that’s two states for two peoples, Israel and Palestine living side by side,” peacefully and securely.
As reported by Western Journalism, during the week of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s re-election, the Obama administration strongly suggested that it would pull support for Israel at the United Nations, paving the way for an imposed two-state solution. The international body has a long history of hostility towards Israel.
Netanyahu has been an outspoken critic of the Obama administration’s nuclear arms negotiations with Iran. In a speech before a joint session of Congress in March, he said that the nuclear agreement being championed by the Obama Administration “doesn’t block Iran’s path to the bomb, it paves Iran’s path to the bomb.”
The framework of the nuclear agreement announced last month allows Iran to continue to enrich uranium at the same rate it was when Obama became President.
Many do not understand how Obama can negotiate with a regime that supports terrorism in the region against Israel, and worse, does not even recognize Jewish state’s right to exist.
Netanyahu recognizes Iran represents an existential threat to his nation. During the annual Holocaust memorial day in April, he said:
As the Nazis strived to trample civilization and replace it with a ‘master race’ while destroying the Jewish people, so is Iran striving to take over the region and expand further with a declared goal of destroying the Jewish state.
Watch: Obama Just Called For Cops To Do Something ‘Unbelievable’ To Their Uniforms
"If you were a police officer, what are you thinking right now?"
The Obama administration announced a ban on the sale of some military-style equipment to local law enforcement agencies earlier this week. Additionally, the administration is looking to implement “softer uniforms” for police.
Local police departments are now prohibited from purchasing tracked armored vehicles, bayonets, grenade launchers, and large caliber weapons and ammunition. They will also face limits on other federal equipment, including explosives, riot equipment, and wheeled armored or tactical vehicles.
The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the largest law enforcement union in the United States, lambasted the administration for the move.
“The FOP was very disappointed that the ‘controlled’ equipment list identified protective gear like anti-ballistic shields and helmets as well as armored vehicles, as this will make these defensive purchases much more difficult to obtain,” an FOP statement said. “Similarly, some less than lethal technologies have also been put on the ‘controlled’ equipment list.”
All of us know that this issue is not really about equipment. We ought not to be distracted by thinking the problem is with the types of equipment or how the equipment is procured.
Instead, we need to focus on better command decision-making at the local and State level with respect to how and when the equipment is deployed in the field. This, and of course appropriate training for the officers who are directed to use the equipment, is critical.
Speaking on The Kelly File Thursday, Fox and Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade pointed out the administration also wants “softer uniforms” for police officers.
“They’re concerned about the helmet. They’re concerned about the shield. It’s sending the wrong message,” Kilmeade said. “I used to think from the civilian point of view that that would be a reason not to riot, because the police were ready and ready to act.”
Kilmeade also told Kelly that if he were a police officer today, he would not show up to the next riot.
h/t: Fox News
Scott Walker -- Unintimidated -- Even in the Face of a 'Steady Stream of Death Threats'
Together, we've fired Reid and Pelosi, and hired the Republicans to STOP Obama. But I must admit, I'm very dissappointed with GOP Leaders.
As a conservative, I don't expect Republicans in Washington to win every single battle with Obama. BUT I DO expect them to fight!
It's simply impossible to STOP OBAMA and the DEMOCRATS without confronting them. Instead, our GOP Leaders have 'punted the ball' or 'kicked the can' at every chance.
On the other hand, Gov. Scott Walker is a VERY different type of Republican, which is EXACTLY why I support him to the MAX!
Scott Walker is a genuine conservative, and a bold, PROVEN leader. His 'unintimidated' courage in the face of the very ugliest of Obama attacks is another HUGE reason why I support him Scott Walker for President.
I don't expect Scott Walker to win every single battle. But I KNOW he'll fight for me and my family, just as he has done repeatedly for Wisconsin families.
I'd like to share with you a brief excerpt from Gov. Walker's book,
"Unintimidated". It details one of the many death threats Scott Walker and his family received during the Democrat protests against his 'budget repair bill':
"We soon began to get a steady stream of death threats. Most of these Dave [head of the Governor's security detail] and his team intercepted and kept from Tonette and me. They were often graphic (one threatened to 'gut her like a deer'), but for the most part they amounted to little more than angry venting.
But one afternoon, as I prepared to go out to the conference room for my daily press briefing, Dave came into my office and shut the door. 'Sir, I don't show you most of these, but I thought you ought to see this one.' He handed me a letter addressed to Tonette that had been picked up by a police officer at the executive residence in Maple Bluff. It read:
Has Wisconsin ever had a governor assassinated? Scotts heading that way. Or maybe one of your sons getting killed would hurt him more. I want him to feel the pain. I already follow them when they went to school in Wauwatosa, so it won't be too hard to find them in Mad. Town. Big change from that house by [BLANK] Ave. to what you got now. Just let him know that it's not right to [EXPLETIVE] over all those people. Or maybe I could find one of the Tarantinos [Tonette's parents] back here.
Lots of choices for me.
Gov. Walker, thank you for refusing to be bullied by Obama and his thugs. Thank you for staying in the fight.
As you know, Scott Walker WON that battle, and he then went on to win many others. Earlier this year, he signed Right-to-Work into law.
As you know, Scott Walker WON that battle, and he then went on to win many others. Earlier this year, he signed Right-to-Work into law.
Now, Scott Walker is considering a run for President.
He has already earned our respect, but now he needs our support!
This is why Go Big, Go Bold PAC was started -- to harness into place the financial resources and vital grassroots support needed to elect a bold, conservative President in 2016 -- Scott Walker.
Isn't it time for conservatives to support someone for president who knows how to win, and who's willing to fight for what's right?
Conservatives must urgently rally behind Scott Walker, encouraging him in the strongest of terms to take the next immediate step.
Go Here RIGHT NOW to Rally Support Behind Scott Walker. Please consider a contribution of $10 or $100 or even $1,000. Anything you can do would be incredibly helpful.
It's our way of saying thank you - while helping to build support for Scott Walker.
America urgently needs Gov. Walker's bold, conservative leadership in Washington. He is tough as nails, never quits, and he knows how to win.
Let's bring bold, conservative leadership to America - Scott Walker for President!
Go Scott, Go!
Go Big, Go Bold PAC
Hillary Slept Through Benghazi Briefing
And these are the emails she is letting us see. Imagine what is in the ones she destroyed.
Check it out:
Only the most conspiratorial among us suspected that the State Department’s decision to release a tranche of Hillary Clinton’s private emails on the Friday before a long holiday weekend just might be an effort to bury the revelations. Well, just because you’re paranoid doesn’t mean they’re not out to get you.
The journalists who combed through the emails learned, among other things, that State officials spent quite a bit of their time investigating leads sent to Clinton via her longtime associate Sidney Blumenthal. Though Barack Obama’s White House blocked Clinton’s request to add Blumenthal to her staff at State as a speechwriter, it seems that the Clinton confidant served as a key outside advisor to the former secretary of state.
But some of the most compelling details in those emails regarding Clinton’s conduct were in regards to the deadly 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Benghazi. The emails reveal that the White House regarded Clinton as the “public face of the U.S. effort in Libya” in 2012. “She was instrumental in security the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime.” The White House noted that Clinton had been a “critical voice on Libya,” working closely with the president, NATO, and a number of contact groups both during the coalition intervention and in its aftermath. And when officials received a presidential briefing three days after the September 11, 2012 attack that took the life of a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans, Hillary Clinton was asleep.
Aqui puedes leer alrrededor de 300 de los e-mails de Hillary
Here you can read alrrededor 300 of the e-mails of Hillary
FH: (Hillary in Hot Water)
Internal emails show Clinton got detailed intel on 'planned' Benghazi hit
Published May 22, 2015
Rpt: Clinton received now-classified info on private email
WASHINGTON – Internal State Department emails in the aftermath of the Benghazi terror attack show then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received detailed information indicating the strike was planned by well-trained fighters, yet her office continued to push the narrative days later that it began "spontaneously."
The messages were among 296 emails released Friday by the State Department, in the first batch of emails to be made public from Clinton's tenure as secretary of state. Totaling 896 pages, the emails show a series of Libya dispatches Clinton received from a confidant, as well as the barrage of messages among her and her aides after Sept. 11, 2012.
Those messages depict the rapidly changing understanding of what happened at the U.S. compound that night, and the administration's internal struggle to settle on a public narrative.
As previously reported, confidant Sidney Blumenthal fired off two memos in the two days after the attack. But the full email release shows he gave a highly detailed picture of what "sources" said had happened that night. Initially, on Sept. 12, he sent Clinton an email linking the attacks to anger over an anti-Islam Internet video which had triggered protests across the region.
But the next day, he sent Clinton an email with very different information, saying officials believed the attackers were with the Islamist militia Ansar al-Sharia. He wrote that officials thought the attackers "prepared" for the strike and "took advantage of the cover" from demonstrations over the video. Further, he cited sources saying roughly 21 fighters left from a base in East Benghazi and "infiltrated the crowd" and began opening fire on the U.S. consulate. Libyan officers, he wrote, said the attacks were "planned" for roughly one month.
Fighters with the brigade were described as "well-trained, hardened killers, many of whom have spent time in Afghanistan and Yemen."
Despite the guidance, then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice went on several television programs Sept. 16 to claim the attacks were "spontaneous," and not premeditated, and link them to protests over the anti-Islam video.
The department appeared to back her. In an email sent that day from top department official Jake Sullivan to Clinton, he said Rice had made clear "our view" that "this started spontaneously and then evolved."
Yet on Sept. 24, after a fierce political debate had broken out over the nature of the attacks, the same official sent Clinton a compilation of her own statements on Benghazi, assuring her "you never said spontaneous or characterized the motives" and only said "some sought to justify" the attack by citing the video.
The exchanges are sure to fuel the long-running debate over why some in the administration initially pushed the video explanation and played down the idea that the attack was planned. Fox News reported earlier this week that a Defense Intelligence Agency report from Sept. 12 also said there were indicators the attack was planned and meant as retaliation for a drone strike that killed an Al Qaeda strategist.
Fox News also reported in October 2012 that a set of internal emails declared Ansar al-Sharia claimed responsibility for the attack in Benghazi virtually as the raid played out. The emails were sent by the State Department to a variety of sources.
The emails released Friday are just a fraction of what the department has in its custody -- after it was revealed that Clinton used a private email address and server, and turned over her files to the department.
Spokeswoman Marie Harf said the emails were given to a House committee investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya.
She said redactions were made according to Freedom of Information Act standards. The documents cover emails between 2011 and 2012 related to the Benghazi facility and its security, and to the broader issue of a U.S. diplomatic presence in Libya.
Harf said the emails "do not change the essential facts or our understanding " about the attacks that killed four Americans on Sept. 11, 2012. The State Department is still reviewing 55,000 further pages of emails from Clinton's private email account. They'll be published on a rolling basis.
Another email in the batch showed Clinton received information on her private email server that has now been classified about the deadly attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi. The email in question, forwarded to Clinton by Sullivan, her deputy chief of chief, relates to reports of arrests in Libya of possible suspects in the attack.
The information was not classified at the time the email was sent but was upgraded from "unclassified" to "secret" on Friday at the request of the FBI, according to State Department officials. Because the information was not classified at the time the email was sent, no laws were violated, but Friday's redaction shows that Clinton received sensitive information on her unsecured personal server.
No other redactions were made to the collection of Benghazi-related emails for classification reasons, the officials said.
It is at the end of a chain of communication that originated with Bill Roebuck, the then-director of the Office of Maghreb Affairs, that pointed out that Libyan police had arrested several people who might have connections to the attack. The redacted portion appears to relate to who provided the information about the alleged suspects to the Libyans. A total of five lines related to the source of the information were affected, but only the 23 words were deleted because the FBI deemed them to be classified.
Benghazi committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., questioned the email release in a written statement on Friday, calling it part of a "self-selected public record."
"It is also important to remember these email messages are just one piece of information that cannot be completely evaluated or fully understood without the total record. The Committee is working to collect and evaluate all of the relevant and material information necessary to evaluate the full range of issues in context," he said. "We will not reach any investigative conclusions until our work is complete, but these emails continue to reinforce the fact that unresolved questions and issues remain as it relates to Benghazi."
He reiterated that the committee wants Clinton to turn over her personal server and "the full body of emails over to a neutral, detached, independent third party for review."
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Boy Scouts' Leader Says It's Time to Go 'Gay'
Scratch "morally straight."
And while you're at it, you can cross off "reverent" and "trustworthy."
Boy Scouts of America President Robert Gates is urging his organization to throw in the towel and allow homosexual adults to participate.
"The status quo in our movement’s membership standards cannot be sustained," Gates said at the organization's annual meeting.
Gates was the former secretary of defense, a man who contributed to our country's foreign policy under Presidents Bush and Obama.
Obviously, his track record of success is in danger of continuing.
The homosexual rights crowd for years has been after the Boy Scouts like, well, a group of homosexuals chasing after a group of young boys.
Gates' call for surrender made no reference to the Supreme Court ruling some 15 years ago that the Boy Scouts are a private organization and entitled to set guidelines for the moral fitness of its members.
Inch by inch and seat by seat, the board governing the Boy Scouts has given in to the homosexual agenda as pro-queer members have joined the executive board and moved the group away from its traditional stance of teaching belief in God and moral values to boys.
The Girl Scouts, which is not a related organization but began as a similar idea for girls, has long ago given in to the liberal agenda and made headlines this week with its embracing of transgenderism.
The Boy Scouts, however, had stood strong until recent years. For more than a century, Scouting had taught growing boys the lessons and skills they needed to become men, through everything from camping skills to leadership and science.
The core of that training was always the positive values embodied in things like the Scout Oath and the Scout Law.
Homosexuals and atheists were not allowed, at least not openly, because the Scouts' adult members and older teens were expected to be moral role models for the younger.
Gates' word is not the final decision of the executive board or the advisory council, but if the Scouts' president is leading the homosexual charge, it won't be long before homosexual scoutmasters are spending weekends alone in the woods with pubescent boys, and homosexual boys will be flirting openly with other troop members.
Liberals may think that's all fine, but I think most caring parents wouldn't want their boys exposed to that sort of perverted environment, especially in an organization that will no doubt continue to hypocritically tout its morality.
There is an alternative in the Christian-founded , though I'm not sure how that group handles non-Christians. One nice thing about the Boy Scouts was always their commitment to actual diversity, not the liberal party-line variety.
But unless there's a change of leadership, and quickly, the Boy Scouts can be written off as yet another traditional institution destroyed by the Left.
THUG LIFE: Suspect Wanted in Brutal Murder of White Family, Has Been Arrested [WATCH]
Hopefully justice will be served to this prick. Let’s see how his defense attorney justifies this case.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
“En mi opinión”