Gingrich said President Barack Obama has decided to “divide the country as viciously” as needed to beat Republican candidate Mitt Romney.
“I think what Republicans don’t get yet is the Obama team is not running the 2004 campaign, they’re not trying to turn Romney into John Kerry. They’re running the [Jennifer] Granholm campaign against Dick DeVos,” Gingrich said in an video interview with TheDC.
“They’ve decided this is a class warfare election, that they are going to divide the country as viciously and as deeply as they need to and that they are going to crowd Romney into being the defender of the rich while they defend everybody else.”
Gingrich called this a “major challenge” the Romney campaign will have to overcome.
“This is a message that is very dangerous because it is something that resonates, with a lot, particularly in the Midwest, resonates with a lot of people and Romney’s going to have to break through and I think find a trump which knocks it aside and convinces people that it’s baloney,” Gingrich told TheDC.
To counter the Obama team’s message, Gingrich said Romney has to “go straight at Obama.”
Creo que el SOCIALISMO EUROPEO va a estallar ante que la Guerra con Irán. Por Ricardo Samitier.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/13/gingrich-obama-campaign-the-most-methodically-systematic-dishonest-team-weve-ever-seen-video/#ixzz23WTFl96Ahttp://dailycaller.com/2012/08/13/gingrich-obama-campaign-the-most-methodically-systematic-dishonest-team-weve-ever-seen-video/#ixzz23WSt4l9G http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/13/gingrich-obama-campaign-the-most-methodically-systematic-dishonest-team-weve-ever-seen-video/
Los bancos que operan en España pidieron en
julio al Banco Central Europeo (BCE) 402.185 millones de euros, un nuevo récord desde que el Banco de España proporciona estos
datos, en enero de 1999-, que eleva un 10% lo que solicitaron un mes antes y multiplica por siete las peticiones del año
anterior. Cualquiera
de las dos cosas van a INFLUENCIAR las elecciones de Noviembre.... Obama
y los comunistas FABIANOS del mundo están tratando de “APLAZAR LA EXPLOCION”
Si Ricardo, coincido contigo una vez mas. El mundo esta caminando
por una cuerda floja de un hilo de coser. En cualquier momento nos pasa como el
cuento del gallinero:
Cuando llega un guanajo de peso no muy ligero. Se sube y parte el palo y se van pal'carajo los de arriba, los de abajo y los que vinieron primero. LRGM. http://www.abc.es/20120814/economia/abci-bancos-peticiones-201208141030.html
Cuando llega un guanajo de peso no muy ligero. Se sube y parte el palo y se van pal'carajo los de arriba, los de abajo y los que vinieron primero. LRGM. http://www.abc.es/20120814/economia/abci-bancos-peticiones-201208141030.html
$337,500.000 RECAUDADOS POR MULTAS DE TRANSITO. Por Ricardo Samitier. Como estamos en campaña política mientras conducía oí a unos de los jueces postulados decir que más de 1 millón 500 mil casos de transito se realizaban en Miami... poniéndole como promedio $225.00 dólares... el mínimo de los gastos de corte ahora son $150.00 solamente por MULTAS... la recaudación asciende a $337,500.000. Esa es la razón que los policías TIENEN CUOTAS de multas y a finales de mes... se ponen más multas que durante el mes... ¡HAY QUE CUMPLIR LAS CUOTAS... contra los CHOFERES...
Forget Obamacare… This Might Be The Most Important Lawsuit in American History.
Despite a mainstream media blackout on the topic, the alternative media is abuzz with this week’s hearing on the constitutionality of the clearly unconstitutional NDAA. In case you don’t remember, section 1021 of the NDAA, which Obama signed into law on December 31 of last year, allows the government to lock up U.S. citizens indefinitely without a trial. At the time of signing, Obama penned a pathetic letter to many of his outraged supporters where he basically said he signed it but he won’t use it. Thanks pal!In any event, the Administration is showing its true colors by appealing an injunction that judge Katherine Forrest issued against it in May. The injunction was in response to the lawsuit filed by Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Chris Hedges and others. While the NDAA clearly vaporizes the 5th and 6th Amendments of the Constitution, I believe the real target is the 1st Amendment. By having a law on the books that allows the government to arbitrarily lock anyone up and throw away the key, the government is actually trying to instill enough fear in people that they self-censor speech and become too afraid to criticize the criminal elite political and economic oligarchy.
Tangerine Bolen is one the lead plaintiffs in the suit against the government and she penned a powerful piece for the UK’s Guardian. Here are some key quotes:
I am one of the lead plaintiffs in the civil lawsuit against the National Defense Authorization Act, which gives the president the power to hold any US citizen anywhere for as long as he wants, without charge or trial.
In a May hearing, Judge Katherine Forrest issued an injunction against it; this week, in a final hearing in New York City, US government lawyers asserted even more extreme powers – the right to disregard entirely the judge and the law. On Monday 6 August, Obama’s lawyers filed an appeal to the injunction – a profoundly important development that, as of this writing, has been scarcely reported.
Judge Forrest had ruled for a temporary injunction against an unconstitutional provision in this law, after government attorneys refused to provide assurances to the court that plaintiffs and others would not be indefinitely detained for engaging in first amendment activities. At that time, twice the government has refused to define what it means to be an “associated force”, and it claimed the right to refrain from offering any clear definition of this term, or clear boundaries of power under this law.
This past week’s hearing was even more terrifying. Government attorneys again, in this hearing, presented no evidence to support their position and brought forth no witnesses. Most incredibly, Obama’s attorneys refused to assure the court, when questioned, that the NDAA’s section 1021 – the provision that permits reporters and others who have not committed crimes to be detained without trial – has not been applied by the US government anywhere in the world after Judge Forrest’s injunction.
Full article here.
I would also take the time to watch this short video from one of the co-counsels on the case as to exactly what the government is arguing in court. Not a word from the mainstream media on the most important court case in American history. One that will decide the fate of a law that will effectively dismantle at least a third of The Bill of Rights. http://www.yolohub.com/featured/forget-obamacare-this-might-be-the-most-important-lawsuit-in-american-history
Ron Paul exposes United
Nations plan to destroy US. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ArUoyuDd74&feature=share
Verifíquelo en:
http://premium.cnn.com/TRANSCIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.HTML
9. $200 Billones de dólares en supresiones de salarios de americanos son causados por extranjeros ilegales. |
Verifíquelo
en: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSC RI PTS/0604/01/ldt.01.HTML
10. Los extranjeros ilegales que se encuentran en E.U. tienen un promedio de crímenes que es DOS Y MEDIA VECES el de los extranjeros blancos no ilegales. En particular, sus hijos están acrecentando el problema del crimen en E.U.
Verifíquelo en : http://transcripts.cnn./.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML
11. Durante el 2005 entre 4 y 10 MILLONES de extranjeros ilegales cruzaron nuestras frontera del Sur, entre ellos 19,500 de países terroristas, millones de libras de cocaína, metadona, heroína y marihuana que pasaron a través de estas fronteras.
Verifíquelo en: Homeland Security Report:
12. El Instituto Nacional de Política estimo que el costo total de deportación en masa seria entre $206 y $230 BILLONES a un costo promedio annual de entre $41 y $46 BILLONES durante un periodo de 5 anos.
Verifíquelo en: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute./.org/PDF/deportation.PDF ;
13. En el 2006 los extranjeros ilegales enviaron $45 BILLION in remisiones a sus países de origen.
Verifíquelo en: http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm
10. Los extranjeros ilegales que se encuentran en E.U. tienen un promedio de crímenes que es DOS Y MEDIA VECES el de los extranjeros blancos no ilegales. En particular, sus hijos están acrecentando el problema del crimen en E.U.
Verifíquelo en : http://transcripts.cnn./.com/TRANscriptS/0606/12/ldt..01.HTML
11. Durante el 2005 entre 4 y 10 MILLONES de extranjeros ilegales cruzaron nuestras frontera del Sur, entre ellos 19,500 de países terroristas, millones de libras de cocaína, metadona, heroína y marihuana que pasaron a través de estas fronteras.
Verifíquelo en: Homeland Security Report:
12. El Instituto Nacional de Política estimo que el costo total de deportación en masa seria entre $206 y $230 BILLONES a un costo promedio annual de entre $41 y $46 BILLONES durante un periodo de 5 anos.
Verifíquelo en: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute./.org/PDF/deportation.PDF ;
13. En el 2006 los extranjeros ilegales enviaron $45 BILLION in remisiones a sus países de origen.
Verifíquelo en: http://www/..rense.com/general75/niht.htm
14. El LADO
OSCURO de la inmigración ilegal: Casi UN MILLÓN de crímenes sexuales
cometidos por inmigrantes ilegales en E.U.
Verifíquelo en: http:
// www.drdskcom/articleshtml
El costo total es: $ 338.3 BILLONES DE DÓLARES ANUALMENTE
El costo total es: $ 338.3 BILLONES DE DÓLARES ANUALMENTE
Cantidad que es más que suficiente como para ESTIMULAR LA
ECONOMÍA PARA LOS CIUDADANOS DEL PAÍS.
Somos tan ESTÚPIDOS? SÍ, POR DEJAR A AQUELLOS EN EL CONGRESO SALIRSE CON LA SUYA AÑO TRAS AÑO!!!
Somos tan ESTÚPIDOS? SÍ, POR DEJAR A AQUELLOS EN EL CONGRESO SALIRSE CON LA SUYA AÑO TRAS AÑO!!!
Legisladores republicanos presentan demanda civil contra Eric Holder Washington (CNN) – El Comité de Supervisión de la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos, de mayoría republicana, presentó este lunes una demanda civil contra el secretario de Justicia, Eric Holder, en busca de la liberación de documentos relacionados a la operación Rápido y Furioso. La demanda pide a un juez federal que determine que el presidente Barack Obama se extralimitó en su autoridad al reclamar privilegios ejecutivos sobre los documentos buscados por la comisión investigadora de la Cámara para examinar la operación contra el tráfico de armas. http://cnnespanol.cnn.com/2012/08/13/legisladores-republicanos-presentan-demanda-civil-contra-eric-holder/
Stunning, Terrible Choice of Ryan for VP. So much for Romney making a pick that says something about his own views (whatever they are). Instead, he feared what Bill Kristol might say and buckled under. As always. Mitt Romney tells America that he is not his own man and hasn’t even the remotest fleeting desire to be his own man. He is owned by the right wing. Ryan will immediately become the flashpoint of this campaign. Yes, he’ll get the usual soft-focus biographical rollout. Expect Republicans to talk endlessly about his authenticity, his blue-collar roots, the fact that he once drove an Oscar Mayer weiner truck—and, certainly, his Catholicism. Also, his brains. He’s a smart guy, no doubt of that, although as I’ve written many times, it says something deeply pathetic about the GOP that Ryan has managed to become a star just because he’s bothered to learn policy. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/11/michael-tomasky-on-romney-s-stunning-terrible-choice-of-ryan-for-vp.html
La película
“Obama 2016”, se empezó a exhibir en partes de la nación americana “menos” en
Miami??? Por amenper.
La semana pasada, esta semana se empezará a exhibir en
el resto de los Estados Unidos, menos en Miami. 2016: Obama's America | Book a Theater
Dick Cheney dice que” El Amateur” es el libro que
desnuda la personalidad de Obama. Yo leí el libro, y efectivamente, como
está visto desde el punto de vista de un escritor de izquierda, tiende a tener
una objetividad que lo hace diferente, no es sectario, simplemente reconoce la
realidad de que estamos ante un personaje extremadamente peligroso, por sus
ideas y por su incapacidad. Pero la opinión de Ceney viene de un erudito,
para la intelectualidad del ciudadano medio, la película "Obama
2016", presenta una visión más clara y concisa sobre quién es realmente
Obama y cual puede ser el Obama que veremos en 2016 si es re-electo.
Voy a ver la película el próximo viernes, mi hijo ya
la vió la semana pasada, y me cuenta que es mucho mejor que el libro “El
Amateur” no sólo por la visibilidad que produce una película, pero porque se
presenta de una manera que no deja lugar a dudas la personalidad de Obama, y
desnuda sus intenciones al exhibir los deslices en que como decimos los cubanos
“no lo dijo, se le fue”.
Para poder ver la película me voy a pasar el fin de
semana en mi refugio en Estero, en la costa oeste de la Florida.
En la zona de Fort Lauderdale-Miami Dade, la han
logrado bloquear, si ustedes van al link que le puse arriba y ven los teatros
en que se está exhibiendo la película la semana pasada y esta semana, verán que
nuestra zona es posiblemente en todos los Estados Unidos la única en que
no se presenta.
Los 29 votos electorales de la Florida, pueden definir
las elecciones, y la densidad de población y la demográfica de la zona de Fort
Lauderdale-Miami Dade, hacen de nuestra zona un punto estratégico que la
campaña de Obama cree tener cautiva por el voto afro, judío y geriátrico.
Según me dicen, el que vea la película, por muy
izquierdistas que sean sus ideas, nunca votaría por Obama.
No sé como se podría lograr que las cadenas de teatros
de nuestra zona la presentaran, pero creo que cualquier esfuerzo que se pudiera
hacer sería muy conveniente para el futuro de América.
HOW TO DEAL WITH ARMED FOREIGN TROOPS ON US SOIL
|
HOW TO DEAL WITH ARMED FOREIGN TROOPS ON UNITED STATES SOIL
It is being reported by several sources that “Armed
combat ready Mexican troops have entered Texasâ€. It
has further been reported, that both state and federal authorities have been
informed by citizens about this illegal incursion by armed foreign troops
onto US Soil; that both state and federal authorities admitted knowledge of
the illegal incursion by armed foreign troops onto US Soil; and, that both
state and federal authorities approved of this illegal incursion by armed
foreign troops onto US Soil.
It was further reported that Congressman Ron Paul (Texas) responded to
calls about the situation in this way: “Any Mexican troops in the United
States period is Illegal and Unconstitutional.†Congressman Paul is correct!
Why Would Our Government Allow Armed Foreign Troops onto US Soil
The Associated Press reported on September 8 that Mexican troops were
being escorted by the US army to help relief efforts for hurricane Katrina. A
convoy of 45 vehicles crossed into U.S. territory on their way to help
evacuee operations in San Antonio.
Under the guise of disaster relief, foreign troops are allowed onto
American Soil, all in an effort to desensitize the American public to such
illegal and Unconstitutional acts. Today it is 200; next time it will be
20,000; then 200,000. The sad part is, most Americans are completely blind to
the “raison d'être†for these troops being here; and are welcoming them
with open arms.
Constitutional Response to an Illegal Incursion by Armed Foreign Troops onto US Soil
If the United States were still a true Constitutional Republic; that
is, a government of the People, by the People, and for the People, there
would be no question as to what to do about Armed Mexican Troops crossing
over into the United States. That would be an INVASION; and therefore the
Militia would be called forth by Congress to repel the invasion.
US Constitution, Article I, Section 8:
Congress shall have Power to:
Clause 15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and Repel Invasions… What Can We Do about an Illegal Incursion by Armed Foreign Troops onto US Soil?
At this point, all we can do is complain to the government. Since we
have allowed the government to abolish the “Militiaâ€, we have no other
recourse! The only thing we can do is to organize and Re-Build our Militia;
Town by Town, and State by State.
I have updated my article on the Militia, and included it for those
who wish to see just how we have come to be where we are today.
Is this true?
THE
BLUEPRINT FOR OUR REPUBLIC’S DESTRUCTION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A POLICE
STATE By: SCRIBE
09-2005
Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and liberties of the
people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army
upon their ruins".
Massachusetts Representative Elbridge Gerry was absolutely accurate in
his statement! Before any government can impose tyranny upon the populace,
they first have to disarm them! In the case of the United States, that meant
that anyone in government who wished to terminate Constitutional rule and
impose totalitarianism (a Police State), would first have to end the
Militia system, and then outlaw and confiscate all firearms in the hands of
the People. The first of these two steps has already been accomplished!
Although Militia laws still exist at both the Federal and State level, the
whole concept that the ‘Citizen Militia’ is the ‘Palladium of
Liberty’, which was so embedded in our Fore Fathers ideals, has now been
entirely eradicated from the Populace (Palladium means Safeguard).
How to Defend Home and Land
Ever since the establishment of the Colonies in North America in the
early 17th Century, and right through into the later half of the 19th
Century, the Idea of an ‘Armed Populace’ or ‘Citizens Militia’ to
defend home and land was predominant. It was believed that, instead of
depending on a compensated military, that each and every individual, armed,
trained, and ready, was indeed the best way to secure one’s nation against foreign
invasion or tyranny in government! What Follows are some examples of early
American Militia Statutes.
16th Century Militia Laws in Massachusetts - The Bay Colony
"The first General Court (legislative session) in the New World
took place on 25 August 1630. On 22 March 1631 the General Court established
the first military legislation—a simple requirement for universal military
service phrased as a requirement for all adult males (except ministers and
magistrates) to possess arms; towns were to furnish arms to indigents (and
later collect the costs) . This law implemented a concept fundamental in
England since the Assize of Arms (1185), and marked the first of a long
series of laws attempting to enforce this requirement (for example on 12
April 1631 a basic load of ammunition was specified)... Yet another
comprehensive militia law was enacted on 26 May 1652 to codify the various
features which had crept in through amendments and special purpose laws. This
law required for the first time that all minorities (defined in the act as
Scotsmen, Negroes and Indians) living in a town either as settlers, or
servants of settlers, to participate in training as members of
companies" (From Massachusetts Militia Roots - Bay Colony - 17th
Century).
Militias in Virginia between 1600 - 1785
"Organized armed Civilians, known as the Militia, were the
Colonies only protection against Indian raids, internal revolt, and the
threat of Spanish and Dutch invasions. During the Early years of the century
(1600's) All able bodied men, including indentured servants and slaves, were
expected to participate in Militia activities. By the end of the century,
membership in the Militia was more restrictive" (John D. Rockefeller, Jr
Library at Colonial Williamsburg - Researching 17th Century Virginians - Page
4).
During the Revolutionary War years, Thomas Jefferson was the Governor
of Virginia from June 1779 - June 1781. While Governor of Virginia, Jefferson
stated that by law, all males ages 16 to 50, who were not disabled, were
enrolled in the Virginia Militia. Jefferson wrote: "Query IX - The
Number and Condition of the Militia and Regular Troops, And Their Pay - Every
able-bodied freeman, between the ages of sixteen and fifty, is enrolled in
the militia. Those of every county are formed into companies, and these again
into one or more battalions, according to the numbers in the county. They are
commanded by Colonels, and other subordinate officers, as in the Regular
Service. In every county is a country-lieutenant, who commands the whole
militia of his country, but ranks only as a Colonel in the field. We have no
General officers existing. These are appointed occasionally, when an invasion
or insurrection happens, and their commission determines with the occasion.
The Governor is head of the military as well as civil power. The law requires
every militia-man to provide himself with the arms usual to the Regular
Service. But this injunction was always indifferently complied with, and the
arms they had have been so frequently called for to arm the Regulars, that in
the lower parts of the country they are entirely disarmed. In the middle
country a fourth or fifth part of them may have such firelocks as they had
provided to destroy the noxious animals which infest their farms; and on the
western side of the Blue Ridge, they are generally armed with rifles. The pay
of our militia, as well as our Regulars, of whom we have none but
Continentals, and part of a battalion of state troops, is so constantly on
the change, that a state of it at this day would not be its state a month
hence. It is much the same with the condition of the other Continental
troops, which is well enough known" (Thomas Jefferson's Writings, Paris
- dated 1782).
North Carolina Militias - 1777
North Carolina had a Militia Statute similar to that of Virginia. Hugh
Lefler and Albert Ray Newsome tell us on pages 225-226 in their book 'North
Carolina - The History of a Southern State' published in 1954, that:
"State Militia - Realizing that the militia was the 'first line of
defense', the first General Assembly of the new state in 1777 passed an 'Act
To Establish A Militia in This State' under which all free white males, ages
sixteen to sixty, inclusive, were subject to militia service... Governor
Martin, in 1782, placed the figure of state militia at 26,822".
Who is the Militia
In Fact, every Colony (and later every State), had some type of Law or
Statute that Required Militia Service! Why? Because our Fore-Fathers felt
that it was each man’s Duty to Protect his Family, his Home, his State, his
Country; and yes, His Liberties and Freedoms as well! While Debating in
Congress the issue of Standing Armies vs. Militias, Representative Randolph
stated: "A People who mean to continue Free must be prepared to meet
Danger in Person, and not to rely upon the fallacious protection of mercenary
armies". So, the first question we must answer is, exactly who are the
‘Militia’?
"Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Congress have no
power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every other terrible implement
of the soldier, are the birthright of an American.... The unlimited power of
the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments,
but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the
people" - Tench Coxe - The Pennsylvania Gazette - Feb. 20, 1788.
"A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves
and include all men capable of bearing arms …To preserve liberty it is
essential that the whole body of people always possess arms " - Richard
Henry Lee - Letters From the Federal Farmer (1788). “I ask, who are the
militia? They consist now of the whole people. To disarm the people is the
best and most effectual way to enslave them." - George Mason, during
Virginia's Convention to Ratify the Constitution (1788).
Justice Joseph Story, in his highly esteemed Commentaries on the
Constitution (1833) described the militia in this manner: "The Militia
is the natural defense of a free country against foreign invasions, domestic
insurrections, and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against
sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and
standing armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which
they are attended, and the facile means which they afford to ambitious and
unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample the rights of the
people. The right of a citizen to keep and bear arms has justly been
considered the palladium of the liberties of the republic, since it offers a
strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers, and
will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable
the people to resist and triumph over them... We can see why the Articles of
Confederation prescribed that 'every State shall always keep up a well
regulated and disciplined militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and
shall provide and constantly have ready for use, in public stores, a due
number of field pieces and tents, and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition
and camp equipage".
The Militia is Not the National Guard!
I can tell you that when the Founding Fathers used the word Militia,
it meant something quite different than what it means to many today. When the
Constitution was ratified, there was no such thing as the National Guard, or
the Uniform (Enrolled) Militia. The National Guard didn’t exist when the
2nd Amendment was written, either. It came into existence well over a century
later. The Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791. The act that created the
National Guard wasn’t enacted until 1903. It was not until May of 1792,
five months after the adoption of the 2nd Amendment, that the Militia Act
became law (The Militia Act of 1792 - An Act more effectually to provide for
the National Defense, by establishing a Uniform (Enrolled) Militia throughout
the United States). The Militia Act required every able-bodied male citizen
who was between the ages of eighteen years and forty-four years old to have a
military rifle and the ammunition for it, and to report regularly for Militia
Duties and Exercises. These military firearms were to be kept in the Militia
Members' Private Homes; not in some State Armory, as is the case with the
National Guard. The Militia Act, for the first time, brought standardization
to all State Militias, and gave distinction between the Uniformed (Enrolled)
Militia, and the Unorganized Militia. Before the passing of this act in 1792,
there was only the Unorganized Militia, and it is that Militia to which the
2nd Amendment refers. It couldn’t refer to the Uniformed (Enrolled)
Militia, because it didn’t exist yet. Read the Militia act. It will confirm
that the 2nd Amendment came before the Federal law that created the Uniformed
(Enrolled) Militia. Since the ONLY Militia that existed prior to the Passage
of the Bill of Rights was the UNORGANIZED Militia, then it must be this
Militia to which the Second Amendment refers. So, the 2nd Amendment was to
ensure that the Unorganized Militia (All Citizens Capable of Bearing Arms)
were to always be armed. Legally, both militias still exist.
Read this excerpt from the Virginia State Constitution written in
1776, many years BEFORE the adoption of the 2nd Amendment, and the passing of
the Militia Act: “Constitution of Virginia - Article I - Bill of Rights -
Section 13. Militia; standing armies; military subordinate to civil power -
That a well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to
arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state, therefore,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; that
standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty;
and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to,
and governed by, the civil powerâ€.
Another aspect to consider is the New Hampshire State Constitution,
which makes an obvious distinction between the National Guard, the State
Guard, and the Unorganized Militia. This distinction remains as a Part of New
Hampshire’s Constitution to this day.
New Hampshire State Constitution- 110-B:1 Composition of the Militia
I. The militia shall be divided into 3
classes, namely the National Guard, the State Guard, and the Unorganized
Militia.
II. The National Guard shall consist of
an Army National Guard, an Air National Guard, and an Inactive National
Guard. As used in this chapter, the term " National Guard†shall mean
and refer to the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard unless otherwise
indicated.
III. The State Guard shall consist of
those persons serving in accordance with the provisions of RSA 111.
IV. The Unorganized Militia shall consist of all able-bodied residents of
the state who are 18 years of age or older, who are, or have declared their
intention to become, citizens of the United States, and who are not serving
in the National Guard or the State Guard.
1982 Senate Subcommittee Report on the Constitution
"Subsequent legislation in the second Congress likewise supports
the interpretation of the Second Amendment that creates an individual right.
In the Militia Act of 1792, the second Congress defined ‘Militia of the
United States’ to include almost every free adult male in the United
States. These persons were obligated by law to possess a firearm and a
minimum supply of ammunition and military equipment. This statute,
incidentally, remained in effect into the early years of the present century
as a legal requirement of gun ownership for most of the population of the
United States. There can by little doubt from this that when the Congress and
the people spoke of a ‘Militia’, they had reference to the traditional
concept of the entire populace capable of bearing arms, and not to any formal
group such as what is today called the National Guard. The purpose was to
create an armed citizenry, which the political theorists at the time
considered essential to ward off tyranny. From this Militia, appropriate
measures might create a ‘Well Regulated Militia’ of individuals trained
in their duties and responsibilities as citizens and owners of firearms†–
1982 Report by the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on the Constitution, The Right To
Keep And Bear Arms – Preface - Orrin G. Hatch.
Standing Armies; the Bane of Liberty!
The Founders believed that the right to arms was a necessary
ingredient in a Free Society. Bearing arms enabled an individual citizen to
defend himself, his home and family. A group of arms-bearing citizens
functioning as a militia enabled the citizenry at large to defend itself
against tyranny. A professional army was seen as an instrument that could be
used by a tyrannical government to subjugate its citizens. The presence of an
armed citizenry served as a visible reminder to the government of the ability
of the people to remove such government by force if necessary. Militias also
served to eliminate the possibility of a coup by ambitious military leaders.
Finally, the militia served as an instrument through which republican virtues
could be transmitted to generations of new citizens. Because its membership
was universal, there was little danger the militia itself could be employed
in the service of tyranny, since its interests were considered
interchangeable to those of the community from which the militia drew its
members. Furthermore, the local nature of the militia assured that its uses
would be defensive. A professional army, on the other hand, tied
geographically to no one place, might constantly agitate for a policy of
expansion and military adventurism. Just how did the Founders feel about the
idea of a ‘Standing Army’?
Noah Webster, a patriot and scholar, wrote that: "Before a
standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed as they are in almost
every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust
laws by the sword because the whole body of the people are armed, and
constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any
pretense, raised in the United States".
"What, sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the
establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. Now, it must be
evident, that, under this provision, together with their other powers,
Congress could take such measures with respect to a militia, as to make a
standing army necessary. Whenever Governments mean to invade the rights and
liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order
to raise an army upon their ruins" - Massachusetts Representative
Elbridge Gerry, House of Representatives; Amendments to the Constitution -
Amendment 2 - August 17th - 20th, 1789.
"Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the
people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever,
prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of
destruction" - St. George Tucker (1803).
"If circumstances should at any time oblige the government to
form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the
liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at
all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to
defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens" - Alexander
Hamilton, The Federalist No 29.
Debate in Virginia Constitutional Ratifying Convention - 14 June 1788 Article 1 - Section 8 - Clause 12: To Raise and Support Armies Mr. George Mason: “But when once a standing army is established in any country, the people lose their liberty... Why should we not provide against the danger of having our militia, our real and natural strength, destroyed... But we need not give them power to abolish our militia. If they neglect to arm them, and prescribe proper discipline, they will be of no use... They may effect the destruction of the militia, by rendering the service odious to the people themselves, by harassing them from one end of the continent to the other, and by keeping them under martial law". Mr. James Madison: “Mr. Chairman, I most cordially agree, with the honorable member last up, that a standing army is one of the greatest mischiefs that can possibly happen. It is a great recommendation for this system, that it provides against this evil more than any other system known to us, and, particularly, more than the old system of confederation. The most effectual way to guard against a standing army, is to render it unnecessary. The most effectual way to render it unnecessary, is to give the general government full power to call forth the militia, and exert the whole natural strength of the Union, when necessary. Thus you will furnish the people with sure and certain protection, without recurring to this evil". Mr. Patrick Henry: “The militia, sir, is our ultimate safety. We can have no security without it... The great object is, that every man be armed". Mr. George Nicholas: “We must either empower them (government) to employ, and rely altogether on, a standing army; or depend altogether on militia; or else we must enable them to use the one or the other of these two ways, as may be found most expedient. If a standing army were alone to be employed, such an army must be kept up in time of peace as would be sufficient in war. The dangers of such an army are so striking that every man would oppose the adoption of this government, had it been proposed by it as the only mode of defense. Would it be safe to depend on militia alone, without the agency of regular forces, even in time of war? Were we to be invaded by a powerful, disciplined army, should we be safe with militia? Could men unacquainted with the hardships, and unskilled in the discipline of war; men only inured to the peaceable occupations of domestic life, encounter with success the most skilful veterans, inured to the fatigues and toils of campaigns? Although some people are pleased with the theory of reliance on militia, as the sole defense of a nation, yet I think it will be found, in practice, to be by no means adequate... As these two ways are ineligible, let us consider the third method. Does this Constitution put this on a proper footing? It enables Congress to raise an army when necessary, or to call forth the militia when necessary. What will be the consequence of their having these two powers? Till there be a necessity for an army to be raised, militia will do. And when an army will be raised, the militia will still be employed, which will render a less numerous army sufficient. By these means, there will be a sufficient defense for the country, without having a standing army altogether, or oppressing the people". Gov. Edmund Randolph: “With respect to a standing army, I believe there was not a member in the federal Convention, who did not feel indignation at such an institution. What remedy, then, could be provided? Leave the country defenseless? In order to provide for our defense, and exclude the dangers of a standing army, the general defense is left to those who are the objects of defense. It is left to the militia, who will suffer if they become the instruments of tyranny... Is it not incredible that men who are interested in the happiness of their country; whose friends, relations, and connections, must be involved in the fate of their country, should turn against their country... I appeal to every man whether, if any of our own officers were called upon to destroy the liberty of their country, he believes they would assent to such an act of suicide"? Militias Under the Articles of Confederation
Under the Articles of Confederation, Article VI, it states
"...Every State shall always keep a well-regulated and disciplined
militia, sufficiently armed and accoutered, and shall provide, and constantly
have ready for use, in public stores, a due number of field pieces and tents,
and a proper quantity of arms, ammunition, and camp equipment."
The task of fielding an army belonged to the States, and the governor
of each State was the commander-in-chief of that military force. You see, the
people of the various States simply didn't trust their central government
with an army stronger than the militias of the States.
That way, in the event the States were obligated to forcibly subdue an out of control central government, they would always have a superior force with which to do it.
That, by the way, was the main purpose of the 2nd Amendment. The 2nd
Amendment was not structured into the Bill of Rights merely to protect the
right of the American sportsman to hunt quail, or for the American family to
protect itself from intruders in the night. No; it had a much higher purpose!
You see, the Founding Fathers simply did not trust the central government
they were creating. They feared that the day might come when the
“caretakers of freedom†would usurp liberty, unleash tyranny, and
establish a pure democracy. The bureaucrats in the nation's capital would use
their legislative “powers†to obscure the distinctions between a
Constitutionally Limited Republic and a democracy, thereby instituting an
oppressive democratic system where a Free Republic had once existed.
Militias Under the Constitution
While the President is the commander-in-chief of the army and navy, he
does not possess the Constitutional authority to send American Armed Forces,
the Navy, or the Militia, into harm's way. That's a power delegated solely
to the US Congress by the Constitution.
The Congress
Article I, Section 8, of the US Constitution
states: "The Congress shall have power to... Declare War; To raise and
support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a
longer term than two years; To provide and maintain a Navy; To make Rules for
the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forcesâ€.
It goes on to say that “The Congress shall have Power To… Provide
for calling forth the Militia to execute the
Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and Repel Invasions; To
provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United
States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the
Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the
discipline prescribed by Congress."
Therefore, the Congress, and ONLY the Congress (NOT the President) has
the Authority to call forth the Armed Forces or the Militia. And when they
do, it is to be ONLY for the express purpose of “Executing the Laws of
the Union, Suppressing Insurrections, or Repelling Invasionsâ€.
The President
Article II, Section 2, of the US Constitution states: "The
President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United
States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual
Service of the United Statesâ€.
Notice that very important qualifier, “when called
into the actual Service of the United Statesâ€. When called into the actual
Service by whom? By the Congress, of course; the ONLY Branch of the federal
government Constitutionally authorized to do so! The only Constitutional
authority the President has is that of “Commander in Chiefâ€.
Again, notice that very important qualifier, “when called into the actual
Service of the United Statesâ€. The President “shall be Commander in Chief
(of the Militia)… WHEN the Militia are called into the actual Service of
the United States (by Congress)â€. Therefore, the only Constitutional
authority the President has is that AFTER the Congress has called into
actual Service the Militia, he THEN becomes the Commander in Chief!
And for only that period of time that they are in “the actual Service of
the United Statesâ€, for the express purpose of “Executing the Laws of
the Union, Suppressing Insurrections, or Repelling Invasionsâ€!
The Beginning of the End of Militias
Under the Constitution, neither the Congress nor the
White House has the authority to use the “Militia of the Several Statesâ€
to invade another country. And yet they do so, and have done so, since the
early 1900’s. The question then is, exactly when and by what means did they
attain this supposed authority? And exactly when and by what means did they
transform the “Militia of the Several States†into the ‘National
Guard�
After the Spanish-American war of 1898, Federal
defense policymakers, assisted by a group of retired professional military
officers, began to lobby for changing the State Militia system.
Secretary of War Elihu Root initiated a program of
reorganization in the military establishment, resulting in the passage of
‘The Dick Act’ in 1903. The Dick Act signified the beginning of the end
of the old, essentially state-controlled Militia system. The Act required the
States to submit to numerous federal requirements regarding the training,
housing, and equipping of the State Militias. The Dick Act was the first in a
succession of Legislation from Congress that made the States an offer they
couldn't refuse: “FREE†training and equipment, in exchange for
relinquishing control of the Militia. The states happily complied. This was
the birth of the National Guard System that we now have today in every State.
On January 3, 1916, President Wilson further diminished
the powers of the People as a Militia by way of ‘The National Defense Act
of 1916’. This Act authorized the use of the newly constituted 'National
Guard' to serve beyond the borders of the United States. The inability to
order the militia beyond the borders of the United States arose from the fact
that the role of militias was entirely defensive. Without hesitation,
Congress passed the National Defense Act, knowing that America was gearing up
to become involved in WWI; the war to end all wars. The Federal Government
had now devised a clever way to sidestep the Constitutional prohibition
against foreign use of militia troops: President Wilson was authorized to
draft state Guard members into federal service as ‘Reserve Troops’.
Congress subsequently passed ‘The National Defense Act Amendments’ in
1920 as well!
For its part, the Supreme Court upheld this
Constitutional end-run in ‘The Selective Draft Law Cases - Arver v. US’
(1918), Ruling that the power to draft members of the National Guard into the
Regular (Standing) Army, as well as the power to compel civilians to render
military service, was granted to the President by the Constitution.
Subsequently, President Wilson began drafting whole regiments into the
Reserves. Moreover, the National Defense Act, as a condition precedent to the
receipt of federal funds, forced the states to cede most of whatever control
over the Militia that remained, including the Constitutional prerogative to
appoint officers to command the Militia.
Do you see the strategy starting to emerge? The federal government
imposes ever increasing and costly demands upon the States; the States are
forced to accept federal money in order to comply with these demands; yet
must also accept the loss of control that goes along with the money. The end
result? The Militia was destroyed, while a Standing Army was created! A
Standing Army, by the way, which would be taking orders only from the
President. What was once rule from the bottom up, had now become rule from
the top down.
The Militia Today
The demonization of the lawful Militia that
following the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma
City put the final nails in the coffin for the ‘Citizen Militia’. Today,
Militias are viewed as places where right wing, neo-nazi, gun-toting freaks
gather to plot the next overthrow of America! What was once considered the
‘Palladium of Liberty’, is today looked at with abhorrence! And yet, some
State Constitutions still not only recognize the ‘Unorganized Militia’,
but provide for their calling forth in times of trouble! New Hampshire is one
such State!
New Hampshire State Constitution- 110-C:3 Registration and Draft of Unorganized Militia.
(New Hampshire State Constitution- 110-B:1
Composition of the Militia - IV: “The Unorganized Militia shall consist of
all able-bodied residents of the state who are 18 years of age or older, who
are, or have declared their intention to become, citizens of the United
States, and who are not serving in the National Guard or the State Guardâ€.)
I. Whenever it shall be
deemed necessary, the governor may direct the members of the Unorganized
Militia to present themselves for and submit to registration at such time and
place and in such manner as the governor may prescribe in regulations issued
pursuant to this chapter.
II. Whenever it shall be necessary in case of
invasion, disaster, insurrection, riot, breach of the peace, or imminent
danger thereof, or to maintain the National Guard at the number required for
public safety or prescribed by the laws of the United States, the governor
may call for and accept from the Unorganized Militia as many volunteers as
are required for service in the National Guard, or the governor may direct
the members of the Unorganized Militia or such of them as may be necessary to
be drafted into the National Guard.
In Conclusion
"The whole history of Mankind proves that so
far from parting with the powers actually delegated to it, Government is
consistently encroaching on the small pittance of Rights reserved by the
People to themselves, and gradually wresting them out of their hands until it
either terminates in their Slavery or forces them to Arms, and brings about a
Revolution" - Luther Martin, Delegate to the Philadelphia Convention,
March 28th, 1788.
Without the ‘Unorganized Militia’ and our
‘Right To Keep And Bear Arms’, how could we abide by Luther Martin’s
forewarning? Without the “Safeguard of Libertyâ€, how can we stop the
government from moving on to the next logical step in our enslavement: the
abolition of our Unalienable Rights? The sad fact is, it’s already
happening! Along with the loss of our rights, we are witnessing the
Militarization of our Local, County, and State Police. Without a "Well
regulated Militiaâ€, how can we stop this? The truth is, without a "Well
regulated Militiaâ€, we have no defense; no way to ensure “the security of
a free Stateâ€.
The question then is, how do we rebuild our Militia system, and take
back what is rightfully ours? How do we rekindle in each and every Citizen,
that burning Fervor and Desire for Liberty, Freedom, and Rights; that burned
so Passionately in our Fore-Fathers Hearts and Minds? Because, I fear, if we
fail to do so, the Consequences in the end will be to terrible to
contemplate!
Foreign Troops near or in USA NOW ! March 2006. Foreign Troops on US Borders or trained or quartered in our country NOW ! March 2006
NATIONAL Parks Given to UN ?? [1 place where
troops may be quartered]
A comprehensive
government website on the UNESCO and United States MAB or Man and the
Biosphere Program (establishing an extensive biosphere reserve system across
the US, including Yellowstone) as embraced and being implemented by the Clinton
Administration under "ecosystem management/sustained yield" can be
found at the National Biological Service site http://www.nbs.gov/nbii/mab/ This is all part of the
biodiversity treaty approved by Clinton, but never approved by
Congress.
UNESCO's WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE ACTIONS: Yellowstone National Park has now been designated as a "World Heritage Site in Danger."
The spokesman for the
INS Border Patrol Union reports that Asian men and other
The simple truth is that
we've lost control of our own borders and no nation can do that and survive.
We ignore America's lost sovereignty at our peril. President Ronald Reagan.
Is our survival really at stake in our wide-open borders with Mexico
Subtitle In 1952, the
Illuminati re-drew the map of the entire world, carving countries into
segments, designating that these new segments in each country were to be
patrolled by TROOPS foreign to the
people of that segment. United Nations
Red China and Other Nations In The U.S. During The New World Order
Silent Invasion In November 1998, while
traveling through Texas, I heard some disturbing rumors. People were supposedly
seeing Chinese soldiers in the Mexican desert. At least one Texan decided to
go down and look for himself. He didn't make it back alive. Then came a
curious story, forwarded to me by the editor of a national publication. A
woman in Texas reported that her relatives had warned against returning to
the family's ranch in Mexico. Foreign soldiers were said to be there. It
wouldn't be safe coming in contact with them. When she traveled to Mexico and
met with her relatives the woman learned that the strangers were Asians who
were preparing to attack the United States.
UN TROOPS In America Sun Oct 16, 2005 08:39
When the day of Martial Law comes in America, do not expect Fox News Network, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, BBC News 24, ITV News Channel or Reuters to give a full or accurate account of the truth. Mass genocide will occur like it has done in many other countries like Cambodia, Russia, China, Germany, Poland, Armenia, Georgia, Belorussia, Hungary and the Ukraine over the past 100 years. The best option for alot of Americans is to leave your country and go and live in Europe or maybe Britain. When the day of Martial Law begins the 6 million UNISF and UNMNTF TROOPS in America and Canada will be deployed to round up, gangrape and kill millions of Americans whos names appear on the CIA Red Hit List and the CIA Blue Hit List. .
* NWO - Please Read /
Pass On * Russian TROOPS
Buying Food Create Shortages For Some Mexicans..
There are concerning reports of large numbers of foreign TROOPS and equipment throughout the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. One of the most credible accounts comes from Jim Ammerman, a WWII Air Force vet who became a head chaplain afterwards. This man has spoken around the country, and has been on various radio programs. This is a strong Christian man who has various high level inside contracts & intelligence sources that give him information, but who cannot themselves come forward. About 18 months ago Jim estimated that there were about 30,000 foreign TROOPS in America. About six months ago he upped that to 80,000 TROOPS. Recently he has had contact with two U.S. Congressmen and one U.S. Senator who are quite concerned about the situation and confided to Jim that the number he was using was way off. When Jim asked them what the number was, they said in all three countries it is now over 3,000,000 - Yes this is not a misprint, he was told three million foreign TROOPS are positioned throughout North America today.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Emergency & War
Powers
IN A STATE OF EMERGENCY
"Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency." Senate Report 93-549
THE UNITED NATIONS Today Americans would
be outraged if U.N. TROOPS entered Los
Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! - Henry Kissinger
1992
National Radio
Broadcaster and Documentary Filmmaker Alex Jones Tells the Story of His
Infiltration into the Ultra-Secret, Elite Bohemian Grove Where the Global
Elite Clad in Black, Silver and Red Hooded Cloaks Conduct a Bizarre, Occult
Ritual Worshiping a Giant Stone Owl Idol
National Radio
Broadcaster and Documentary Filmmaker Alex Jones Tells the Story of His
Infiltration into the Ultra-Secret, Elite Bohemian Grove Where the Global
Elite Clad in Black, Silver and Red Hooded Cloaks Conduct a Bizarre, Occult
Ritual Worshiping a Giant Stone Owl Idol
War heads closer to
home; gold, steel discount its advance Preparations are now
being made on U.S. soil by foreign TROOPS to undertake a martial law initiative on
U.S. citizens in the very near future.
1997. During the 1950's,
the elitists planning for world government made plans to use occupation
forces in every country that did not submit to their greedy, arrogant
ambitions. Their plan called for using Chinese TROOPS
in America. This fact is documented by Dr. Dennis Cuddy in his book, Secret
Records Revealed. It is also documented by Willard Cantelon in his book,
Money Master of the World. Now that American soldiers have been used in
Kuwait, Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, and Kosovo, a precedent has been set to bring
the red Chinese TROOPS here. The UN
could justify such an action if the Black Muslims instigate a race war. I
expect this scenario if the Democrats loose the White House and Congress in
the 2000 elections. Comrade Clinton could not be slicker in making himself
Commandant of Gulag America.
Conspiracy Central - The
largest and most diverse source of conspiracy related information and media
available on the Internet
illegal Immigration
Crisis in America! Americans for Legal Immigration ALIPAC licenses security
laws congress president campaigns gangs terrorists border patrol illegal
alien crimes
The deployment of 36,000
National Guard TROOPS or state militia
on the U.S.-Mexico border would stop the illegal flow of foreigners into
America, says a congressional report that credits the Minuteman Project with
proving that additional manpower could
|
“Si usted quiere la total aniquilación de USA como nación vote por el “UFO”
Lázaro R González Miño
https://www.facebook.com/lazarorg
“Salmo109”
7-Cuando fuere juzgado salga culpable; 8-Sean sus días pocos; tome otro su
oficio,
Porque tuyo es El
Reino, El Poder y La Gloria Eterna. AMEN
No comments:
Post a Comment