Thursday, January 17, 2013

La quinta Sinfonía de Beethoven en tiempo de Guaracha. "En mi opinion" Dic. 17, 2013



.“EN MI OPINION” ‘IN GOOD WE TRUST’.
.     Jueves, 17  2013      No 299      Editor Lázaro R González Miño    .

La quinta Sinfonía de Beethoven en tiempo de Guaracha.
No se la pierdan. Disfrutenla… Y que Beethoven nos perdone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBPu7LiTQHM&list=PLK-2IT9YxC9V70P0TX1Dn4SpMzi5Drt0t&index=10

Did Obama Steal The Election With Hagel’s Help?

Chuck Hagel has been tapped by Obama for Secretary of Defense, which has resulted in a slew of push backs over his troubling record: criticism and lack of support for Israel; coddling of Hezbollah, Hamas, and Iran; and his almost immediate appointment after retiring as a senator to Deutsche Bank’s Americas Advisory Board, the mega bank that has been accused of funneling billions of dollars to Iran’s nuclear program.
But the most troubling aspect of Chuck Hagel is the fact that he may have stolen both of his senatorial elections.
In 1992, Hagel was CEO of Election Systems & Software, maker of computerized voting machines.
On March 15, 1995, Hagel resigned as CEO but kept millions in stock options and declared that he was going to run for the U.S. Senate in Nebraska. Although he was a virtually unknown candidate; although he ran against a former governor, Ben Nelson, who was hugely popular; and although all the polls prior to the election indicated Ben Nelson would win the election, oddly Hagel won by a landslide with 83% of the vote.
It later turned out that Hagel’s voting machines had been used in virtually all of the precincts.
When Hagel ran for reelection in 2006, his previous landslide of 83% was eclipsed by an even wider margin.
It turns out that Hagel’s former company, Election Systems & Software/Diebold now counts the votes in most elections.
And it turns out Hagel’s voting machines have been embroiled in investigations of hacking and vote-switching that continue to this day.
Did Barack Obama win the presidential elections the same way Hagel won his senatorial seat? And is this Secretary of Defense position payback for the favor?
Americans should demand to see each and every vote cast for both Chuck Hagel and Barack Obama. http://www.westernjournalism.com/did-obama-steal-the-election-with-hagels-help/

Obama Risking Impeachment With Executive Order?

January 16, 2013 By Daniel Noe 7 Comments
nShare5
Rep. Steve Stockman reveals how he would try to seek Pres. Obama’s impeachment if he implements new gun control measures by executive order…
http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-risking-impeachment-with-executive-order/
News that they do not make public: On Sunday, 2 days after the CT shooting, a man went to a restaurant in San Antonio to kill his X-girlfriend. After he shot her, most of the people in the restaurant fled next door to a theater.
The gunman followed them and entered the theater so he could shoot more people. He started shooting and people in the theater started running and screaming. It's like the Aurora, CO theater story plus a restaurant!
Now aren't you wondering why this isn't a lead story in the national media along with the school shooting? There was an off duty county deputy at the theater.
SHE pulled out her gun and shot the man 4 times before he had a chance to kill anyone. So since this story makes the point that the best thing to stop a bad person with a gun is a good person with a gun, the media is treating it like it never happened. But the media is not biased? Right.
Only the local media covered it. The city is giving her a medal next week.
I thought everyone should know.
Manny Fernandez


Rough language but she really makes her point clear!
I don't think pissed really covers it!!!!!!!!!!!  
Alan Simpson, Senator from Wyoming, Co-Chair of Obama's deficit commission, calls senior citizens the Greediest Generation as he compared "Social Security" to a Milk Cow with 310 million teats.
Here's a response in a letter from PATTY MYERS in Montana... I think she is a little ticked off! She also tells it like it is!
"Hey Alan, let's get a few things straight. 
1. As a career politician, you have been on the public dole for FIFTY YEARS. 
2. I have been paying Social Security taxes for 48 YEARS (since I was 15 years old. I am now 63).
3 My Social Security payments, and those of millions of other Americans, were safely tucked away in an interest bearing account for decades until you political pukes decided to raid the account and give OUR money to a bunch of zero ambition losers in return for votes, thus bankrupting the system and turning Social Security into a Ponzi scheme that would have made Bernie Madoff proud..
4. Recently, just like Lucy & Charlie Brown, you and your ilk pulled the proverbial football away from millions of American seniors nearing retirement and moved the goalposts for full retirement from age 65 to age 67. NOW, you and your shill commission is proposing to move the goalposts YET AGAIN.
5. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying into Medicare from Day One, and now you morons propose to change the rules of the game. Why? Because you idiots mismanaged other parts of the economy to such an extent that you need to steal money from Medicare to pay the bills.
6. I, and millions of other Americans, have been paying income taxes our entire lives, and now you propose to increase our taxes yet again. Why? Because you incompetent bastards spent our money so profligately that you just kept on spending even after you ran out of money. Now, you come to the American taxpayers and say you need more to pay off YOUR debt.
To add insult to injury, you label us "greedy" for calling "bullshit" on your incompetence. Well, Captain Bullshit, I have a few questions for YOU.
1. How much money have you earned from the American taxpayers during your pathetic 50-year political career?
2. At what age did you retire from your pathetic political career, and how much are you receiving in annual retirement benefits from the American taxpayers?
3. How much do you pay for YOUR government provided health insurance?
4. What cuts in YOUR retirement and healthcare benefits are you proposing in your disgusting deficit reduction proposal, or, as usual, have you exempted yourself and your political cronies?
It is you, Captain Bullshit, and your political co-conspirators called Congress who are the "greedy" ones. It is you and your fellow nutcases who have bankrupted America and stolen the American dream from millions of loyal, patriotic taxpayers. And for what? Votes. That's right, sir. You and yours have bankrupted America for the sole purpose of advancing your pathetic political careers. You know it, we know it, and you know that we know it. 
And you can take that to the bank, you miserable son of a b...
NRA’s New Ad Calls Obama “Elitist Hypocrite” For Having Secret Service                      Protection For His Children The ad appeared on the NRA’s “Stand and Fight” website today after being provided to The Blaze. [[Update]] The ad, and website, were down for a brief time but are back up. A copy that is available on YouTube is also ... READ MORE

WND EXCLUSIVE

47 states revolt against Obama gun control

Fed-up Americans: 'We're not going to accept this. We're against it'

Published: 12 hours ago
by Chelsea Schilling Email | Archive
Subscribe to feed
Chelsea Schilling is a commentary editor and staff writer for WND, an editor of Jerome Corsi's Red Alert and a proud U.S. Army veteran. She has also worked as a news producer at USA Radio Network and as a news reporter for the Sacramento Union.More ↓
Thousands of gun owners across America have had enough of the Obama administration’s attack on the Second Amendment – and they’re preparing to take their concerns to the capitols in at least 47 states this Saturday at 12 p.m.
Texan Eric Reed, founder and national  coordinator of the “Guns Across America” rallies, told WND he’s irritated about all the talk of new gun-control regulations and overreach by the federal government in violation of our Second Amendment rights.
“I was trying to figure out why people weren’t being more proactive about this, Reed said. “Then I realized I’m part of the problem. It takes somebody to stand up and say, ‘Hey, we’re not going to accept this. We’re against it.’
“We want Americans who feel the same way to come out. We want to stand up, be united and get our point across.”
As WND reported today, President Obama announce a sweeping set of directives he intends will cut down on Americans’ access to guns, setting the stage for a constitutional battle with states where lawmakers already are openly defying the latest power grab by the White House.
Obama’s plan would demand federal access to the details every time an uncle sells a .22 to a nephew, would ban some weapons outright through a limit on ammunition capacity, would waive medical privacy laws in some cases so individuals can be reported, and others.
The president also listed 23 executive orders he is preparing to implement.
“He’s essentially restricting and punishing all law-abiding American citizens,” Reed said. “He’s taking people who have never committed a crime in their lives and he’s trying to tell them that these guns are ‘assault weapons.’ Well, I’ve got guns in my home. If they’re ‘assault weapons,’ then mine must be defective because they haven’t assaulted anybody.”
Frustrated by the narrative coming out of Washington, Reed noted that “assault weapons” have been banned since 1934.
“The aesthetics of a rifle do not determine what an assault rifle is,” he said. “That’s what our elected officials in Washington, D.C., are trying to sell to the American people. I mean, if you take a body of a Ferrari and stick it on a Chevrolet, it’s still a Chevrolet. It’s going to perform like a Chevrolet; it’s just a cool-looking Chevrolet.”
Reed added that the media contribute to misinformation and confuse the public about so-called “assault weapons.”
“Part of it is ignorance of the media because a lot of them may not necessarily have a good idea of what an assault rifle is,” he said. “Another part of it is, most of the media do push a liberal spin. They’re helping to push through the political agenda that the Obama administration wants to pass right now.”
Thousands of Americans have taken to Facebook to support the pro-gun rallies this weekend.
“The people are pulling themselves away from their families and their personal obligations for one day because the Second Amendment is very important to them,” he said. “If these people are willing to take that kind of time out of their personal lives to try to tell Washington, D.C., something, those guys work for us. It’s their job to listen.”
While they may be tempted to sit the protest out, Reed warns citizens that time is running out.
“This is the most crucial time,” he said. “This is when all the laws and executive orders are coming down the pike. This is the time that we have to act, not next week, not next month. It’s now.
“If our Second Amendment rights are as important as we say they are, we need to come out and show it to the rest of America and Washington, D.C.”
Citizens are encouraged to bring pro-gun signs and their families to the rallies. A petition supporting Second Amendment rights will be circulated at each event.
Event organizers encourage attendees to follow all state gun laws.
So far, gun-rights advocates from at least 47 states are participating. All rallies begin at 12 p.m. local time:
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/47-states-revolt-against-obama-gun-control/#yBmrwieEftSdKkR4.99

 WND EXCLUSIVE

Poll: Seeds of tyranny present in America

Citizenry unwilling to revolt offers temptation to 'government leaders'

Published: 11 hours ago
by Bob Unruh Email | Archive
Subscribe to feed
Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially.More ↓
Editor’s note: This is another in a series of “WND/WENZEL POLLS” conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.
The seeds of a tyrannical government are present in the United States, with a citizenry happy with a heavily armed law enforcement presence and a disbelief that their government could do anything that would make them want to revolt, according to a new poll.
Ads by Google
“America is largely satisfied with the buildup of military-style equipment and armaments by local law enforcement agencies around the country, as 73 percent said they believe these local and state police agencies should possess such equipment,” wrote Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies, a public-opinion research and media consulting company.
His latest results of questions asking Americans what they think about their government, guns, the Second Amendment and their own futures was just released.
He said only 21 percent disagreed that their local officers should be heavily armed.
“This is perhaps because, the survey shows, a wide majority of Americans doubt their local or state police would ever engage in the imposition of some sort of martial law. Such imposition would severely restrict personal freedoms, but 59 percent said they just don’t think such a thing would happen here in America,” he continued.
“That is largely because 51 percent said they cannot conceive of any circumstances or actions by government that would so cause them to agree it is time for a citizen revolution against the government. Just 18 percent said they could conceive of something the government could do to cause them to want to revolt.
“This is a testament to the longstanding stability that the country has known, but also spells a risk of tyranny. If government leaders know the citizenry is unwilling to revolt and they know their law enforcement agencies are well-equipped to put down any uprising with military-style weaponry, one could argue that those leaders might be tempted to impose tyranny on the country in some form or another,” he said.
The telephone survey of registered voters nationwide was conducted Jan. 9-12, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.22 percentage points.
The poll revealed widespread belief that the Second Amendment, which gives Americans the right, “which shall not be infringed,” to hold and bear arms, really is for self-protection and hunting, not for “fighting back against a tyrannical government.”
What can you do to protect yourself if, and when, the unthinkable happens? Find out here!
That, he said, “demonstrates the downside of more than 230 years of government stability. This survey shows it is hard for many Americans to think of a situation in which their government would need to be overthrown. Of course, the last time there was a serious fight for the future of the federal government, in the Civil War, Washington won.”
Nearly 47 percent said the Second Amendment is for hunting and self-protection, while only 8 percent believe it provides a defense for citizens against a tyranny. Four in 10 say it serves both purposes.
Wenzel noted that a significant majority, 69 percent, said the amendment should be kept, while 22 percent said it should be ignored or repealed.
“This is a very strong message to lawmakers and leaders in Washington should tread very carefully as they draft new legislation in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings,” Wenzel said.
“What is also interesting about this survey is that it shows that most Americans understand that a firearm is merely a tool – albeit an efficient one – in the hands of a person intent on harming others. Seven out of 10 respondents said they think that, if a person who wants to harm others does not have a gun available, that he would find another weapon to use. Just 18 percent said they think such a person would give up,” Wenzel explained.
“While some leaders in Washington want to place bans on guns and ammunition, it is clear that most Americans think more focus should be on the person holding the gun.”
Forty-eight percent said gun bans are a bad idea, while 39 percent support such bans. And the survey showed that 56 percent believe that if guns are banned, “criminals would take advantage of an unarmed citizenry and increase their attacks because they know potential victims cannot protect themselves.
“It appears that most Americans are aware of the experiences of Chicago and Washington, D.C., two cities with very strict gun laws that also suffer from a violent crime rate far above the national average,” Wenzel said.
Wenzel said a cause for alarm is that four in 10 said “they favor banning ammo or taxing it so heavily that it becomes impractical to buy it.”
Nearly six in 10 Democrats thought this was a good idea, he noted.
The registration of all firearms with the federal government was supported by 55 percent, while only 38 percent opposed it, he said.
“It is clear that Americans believe in the Second Amendment, but they also want something done to prevent another Sandy Hook shooting. They want more of an emphasis on the people who create these tragedies, just as national lawmakers and leaders appear ready to forget the evil people who wield these weapons in their race to attack the individual freedoms outlined in our founding documents,” Wenzel said.
What can you do to protect yourself if, and when, the unthinkable happens? Find out here!
See detailed results of survey questions:
I have a question about the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees American citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Which of the following perspectives do you believe about the Second Amendment – do you believe it exists to allow Americans to have small arms for hunting and self-protection, or do you believe it exists to give Americans the ability to defend themselves against government if it becomes tyrannical? Or do you believe it exists for both?
Do you believe the Second Amendment continues to serve a useful purpose and should be retained and respected. Or do you think it is outdated and should be repealed or ignored?
Tell me if you agree or disagree with the following statement: “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”?
If a person who is intent on harming others does not have a firearm available, do you think it is more likely that this perseon will use a different weapon to harm others, or do you think that the would simply give up the idea of hurting other people?
Do you believe that local or state governments should place bans or severe restrictions on civilian ownership of firearms, as several major U.S. cities have done?
Those who favor bans on firearms say the bans will make people safer because there would be fewer guns available. Those who oppose bans say that if weapons are banned for law-abiding citizens, only criminals will have guns and crime would increase because criminals would be more likely to use them, knowing victims would have no guns to protect themselves. Which of these statements do you believe is more true?
Some have said that one way around the constitutional guarantee to allow firearm ownership is to ban ammunition, or to tax it so heavily as to make its purchase impractical. Do you favor or oppose this type of legislative action?
Would you favor or oppose a requirement that anyone possessing a firearm register all of their firearms with the federal government in Washington, D.C.?
Thinking about local police forces around the country, the federal government has largely funded a major buildup among city and state police forces in the amount of military-style equipment. Do you agree or disagree that local and state forces should possess military-style armaments?
Some fear that this buildup of military-style equipment by city and state law enforcement agencies makes it more likely that, sometime in the next few years, the government may use this force as part of an effort to impose a type of martial law on their citizens that severely restricts personal freedoms to move about town, travel, or to freely associate with other like-minded individuals. What do you think is the likelihood of this scenario?
Are there any circumstances or actions that our government might take against its own citizens in modern American society that you believe would cause you to agree it is time for citizens to stage a revolution against the government?
THE FULL STORY ON OBAMA’S MASSIVE GUN GRAB:
Poll: Seeds of tyranny present in America
Obama plan: ‘Assault-weapon’ ban, universal background checks
47 states revolt against Obama gun control
Rush Limbaugh: Obama ‘wants people to snap’
‘Obama has dramatically overshot’
Oops! Gun-map hate mail goes to wrong paper
Constitution ‘no impediment’ to Obama
Chicago murders top Afghanistan death toll
Virginia’s solution to guns in school
See WND’s latest columns on gun control:
Guns don’t kill people, the mentally ill do by Ann Coulter
What happened to Lanza’s 4 handguns? by Jack Cashill
The consequences of volatile speech by Phil Elmore
It’s all about safety by Craige McMillan
Guns and government by Andrew Napolitano
‘Gun Culture’ – what about the ‘Fatherless Culture’? by Larry Elder
What will be final outcome of Obama's anti-gun efforts?
  • He's flirting with the potential for escalated violence, civil disobedience and even revolution (67%, 531 Votes)
  • It's a major step toward turning America into a police state (12%, 94 Votes)
  • It could be the final nail in the coffin of liberty in the U.S. (11%, 83 Votes)
  • Nothing. Executive orders have no power. It's just an effort to circumvent Congress and the Constitution (5%, 38 Votes)
  • Nothing. The American people will roll over and accept their fate as subjects of government (3%, 23 Votes)
  • This is just the beginning – all private firearms must be confiscated (1%, 11 Votes)
  • Other (1%, 8 Votes)
  • Gun violence in America will be greatly reduced (0%, 2 Votes)
  • Obama should make it illegal to produce and sell ammunition, thus circumventing constitutional problems (0%, 0 Votes)
  • America will finally be free of gun violence (0%, 0 Votes)
Total Voters: 790

Ads by Google
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/poll-seeds-of-tyranny-present-in-america/#e3p7UcjfIpCY5psQ.99

Tell Florida Sens. Rubio and Nelson:
Immigration Pushes Welfare Spending Over $1 Trillion
More than a quarter of the $1 trillion spent on welfare in the United States goes directly to the households of immigrants.  And two out of three jobs created in the last four years went to immigrants.  Those are jobs that would lift Americans out of poverty, and reduce welfare spending still more.  Instead, just last month, the unemployment rate among black Americans rose to 14 percent.

The problem isn't only illegal immigration: Most legal immigrants use at least one welfare program.  The problem is simply too much immigration.  In fact, while many illegal immigrants have gone home since the start of the recession, the number of legal immigrants in America continues to explode.
Some immigration makes sense.  But such massive levels of immigration are keeping Americans trapped in poverty. And they're exploding the federal deficit, not to mention busting Florida's own budget! Help Senators Rubio and Nelson get the message by sending the free fax below. Tell them to stop importing poverty.

Colunna de Alberto L Perez, amenper.

Jurando sobre dos Libros
Obama ha anunciado que durante la inauguración al segundo término, jurará con dos Biblias, siendo el primer presidente que ha hecho esto. 
Según Obama  son biblias que fueron de Abraham Lincoln y Martin Luther King.  
Lo que me preocupa es que el que administrará el juramento es el Magistrado del Supremo, John Roberts, que es tan despistado últimamente que emitió el voto decisivo para ratificar el ObamaCare.  
A lo mejor no se da cuenta y los libros sobre los que jura Obama son el Korán y el Manifiesto Comunista.

Control de Armas, simplifica, simplifica
Como en todos los problemas, en el caso del control de armas trato de llegar a un consenso simplificando.
Nunca he tenido un arma de fuego, pero esto no me hace un crítico de las personas que creen que deben de tener armas para su defensa. 
No sólo porque es la ley del país y está bien claro en la segunda enmienda de la constitución, pero porque el derecho a portar armas se deriva directamente del derecho de propiedad, ¿A qué nos referimos cuando hablamos de propiedad? Cuando hablamos de propiedad nos referimos a la posesión de algo y a la capacidad de disponer de ese algo (ambas condiciones deben cumplirse). Además porque creo que el prohibir que las personas sean propietarios de armas no soluciona el problema de las armas, que es evitar la violencia criminal.
La violencia existe, Illinois es el estado en que más personas han muerto por armas de fuego, y es un estado con leyes estrictas del control de armas.
Vamos a simplificar mirando desde el punto de vista de las personas que quieren portar armas para su defensa.
Si en vez crear leyes para prohibir la venta de armas a los ciudadanos respetuosos de la ley, que compran sus armas cumpliendo las leyes y las licencias requeridas, impusieran leyes federales que condenaran severamente a las personas que cometan crimen con armas de fuego o que se encuentren con posesión de armas sin permiso, el resultado sería mejor.
Pero el problema es de perspectiva política.  Los liberales todo lo resuelven imponiendo regulaciones en las personas que cumplen la ley, y son blanditos con los criminales
Pero aquí la simplificación de lo que en realidad es esta situación, se trata de que el problema está creado por la filosofía liberal que le gusta el tipo de gobierno paternalista.
Quieren tratar a los ciudadanos cumplidores de la ley como simplones que tienen que ser educados y controlados por el “papá gobierno” a los que hay que imponerles regulaciones de corrección.
Mientras tanto tratan a los criminales como personas a los que no quieren tocar, a los cuales les permiten que evadan las leyes con legalismos y jueces liberales..
Simplificando….simplificando. ¿Por qué no resolver esto sencillamente?  
Esto es muy simple. persigue a los criminales que portan armas de fuego sin permiso y a los que cometen crimen con armas de fuego, no a los ciudadanos respetuosos de las leyes que compran armas bajo los permisos instituidos, es simple es sencillo, entonces ¿Cuál es el problema?
Hay un hecho, una realidad de la que no se habla, no es políticamente correcto.
En las pasadas elecciones vimos como acusaron a los Republicanos de reprimir el voto porque denunciaron que había personas con record criminal votando.
Es un hecho conocido, pero no mencionado, que la mayoría de los criminales violentos votan demócrata. Así que no puedes perjudicar a tus constituyentes.
 Marco Rubio delinea plan para legalizar a inmigrantes indocumentados
A continuación algunos de los puntos clave del plan de Marco Rubio sobre inmigración:

Que un estimado de 12 millones de indocumentados comiencen con el proceso de legalización permitiendo que las autoridades federales les tomen las huellas digitales. Si no han cometido un crimen, pueden demostrar que han estado en EE.UU. por un tiempo considerable, y pagan una multa e impuestos, entonces podrían obtener un “estatus de limbo”, dijo Rubio. Agregó que “asumiendo que no hayan violado ninguna de las condiciones de ese estatus, los trabajadores recién documentados podrían solicitar la residencia permanente y potencialmente la ciudadanía”.
Un aumento al límite de personas que pueden traer inversión al país. El senador hizo hincapié en que EE.UU. no produce suficientes graduados en las ramas de ciencia, matemáticas e ingeniería para hacer frente a sus necesidades en materia de tecnología. Según Rubio, el número de personas admitidas podría ser ajustado de acuerdo a la demanda. “No creo que haya mucha preocupación en este país de que vayamos de alguna manera a ser excedidos por personas con doctorados y empresarios”, dijo Rubio.
Una debilitación de los aspectos relacionados a la reunificación de familiar de acuerdo a las actuales leyes de inmigración. “Soy un ferviente creyente de la inmigración con base a la familia”, dijo Rubio. “Pero no creo que en el siglo XXI podamos continuar teniendo un sistema de inmigración en el que solamente el 6,5 por ciento de las personas que vienen aquí, está basado en la habilidad y el trabajo. Debemos movernos hacia una inmigración basada en los méritos y habilidades”.

Destaca también un programa para ayudar a satisfacer las necesidades de los agricultores estadounidenses. Según Rubio, la mayoría de los 1,6 millones de trabajadores agrícolas de EE.UU. son indocumentados y la agricultura no podría subsistir sin ellos. Por eso propone otorgar un número de visas para trabajadores temporales. “El objetivo es darle a la agricultura estadounidense una fuerza de trabajo confiable y también darle protección a estos trabajadores”, dijo Rubio. “Cuando alguien es indocumentado es vulnerable a la explotación".
El plan en desarrollo de Rubio ya ha obtenido el apoyo del congresista Paul Ryan, quien fue candidato vicepresidencial del partido republicano en las pasadas elecciones del 6 de noviembre.
“El senador Rubio está exactamente en lo correcto respecto a la necesidad de arreglar nuestro sistema quebrado de inmigración. Apoyo los principios que ha delineado: La modernización de nuestras leyes de inmigración; seguridad más fuerte para disminuir la inmigración ilegal; y respeto al derecho de estado para hacer frente al complejo reto de la población indocumentada. Nuestro futuro depende de un sistema que funciones”, Dijo Ryan.
Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who oversaw a moratorium on offshore drilling after the BP oil spill and promoted alternative energy sources throughout the nation, will step down in March.
With Environmental Protection Agency chief Lisa Jackson also leaving the administration and Energy Secretary Steven Chu expected to depart, Obama will have a clean slate of top officials overseeing energy and environment issues.

While this is a good cleaning....  but the source of the debris is at the top.
The cleaning should  start at the point of origin of the damage, this is the only way to be able to get rid of the filth-

IN REFERENCE TO THE REPUBLICAN PARTY NEED TO EVOLVE AND ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION‏

In reference to comments about the republican party and the need to modify some of it ideas and illegal/legal immigration . I have to say that you do NOT understand or know many of the problems with illegal immigration . You think you know about illegal immigration by reading newspaper's articles or listings of some political pundit. But you don't. Don't get me wrong I know you have a hell of an education and also pretty smart. I also have a lot of respect for your financial/economic  savvy and political acumen. But illegal immigration issues and it's problems are subjects that you do not know very well. 

Since I am an immigrant myself and live among them I know a great deal more on the subject than many that come to your show. I also have a college (financial/business analyst)  as well as a veteran of the US arm forces . I am quite verse on the illegal immigration subject since I deal with many of them in more ways than one . I don't have to be political correct and I know how much dirt is in the system and how it works.

Lets start by saying that our country is almost 17 trillion dollar in debt. Also we have about 7.8% unemployment. What does this tell you . To start the country CANNOT afford to pay for more benefits, infrastructure , defense etc as it is and cannot support not even its own  American citizens AS OF TODAY. Also we don't have enough jobs for regular american citizens NOT EVEN FOR THOSE THAT ARE RETURNING FROM THE WAR . It is also another fact that illegal/legal immigrants that are coming have hardly any education for the most part . And this should be clear to everyone. The illegal immigration that our country is getting is costing the country enormous amount of money in unpaid healthcare, school, taxes, jails and many other illegalities . Mr Kudlow you have no idea of the amount of illegal activity that illegal immigration generates throughout the regular economic system. I can only imagine if all of the illegal immigrants become citizens/residents and are allow to have a family unification program what our country would become.

Now also to your surprise will be to know that many of the recent legal immigrants don't approve of the present illegal immigration. Larry you need to get together  with some people that really know what is happening in reference to immigration. America needs to protect its formation and identity. Don't sell the country because of derange political ideology  for the benefit "OF MONEY" or political party advantages. If you and other don't wise up before you know it you will lose the country and will be talking spanish . Look also what is happening in many countries in Europe they are getting the middle east immigrant and that crowd is not going to change their customs/ways nor they bring any real talent/education to a system that can also NOT AFFORD THEM.

One good thing about illegal immigration perhaps it could be is to have the drug cartel  to run the possible new marijuana enterprise in Colorado and Washington now legal and make public companies of them and list them in the stock exchange . The cartel people really know what to do with it and make money if that is what some here want.

Jorge Aguiar
Doral, Florida

Colunna de Ricardo Samitier:

El Gobierno Mintió Descaradamente
Ahora Sale La Verdadera Noticia. De Los 13 Bancos Rescatados...
12 Estaban Insolventes!
Ellos dijeron que solo era una FALTA DE LIQUIDEZ cuando estaban en
BANCAROTA!! Y los SALVARON a costa de casi 5 millones de casas
REPOSEIDAS y 16 millones de personas votadas a la calle...
Tenían que haber sido liquidados los bancos y sus valores subastado como
en cualquier caso…
Porque, El Trato Especial???
He aquí la noticia  publicada el día 13 hace 4 días... donde nadie la lee...
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/01/12-of-the-13-big-banks-went-bust-and-the-government-lied-when-it-said-it-only-bailed-out-healthy-banks.html

La Historia Oficial Es Una Mentira!
La Verdad Es Que Alemania No Confía
En Los Estados Unidos Porque Los
Estados Unidos Están En Bancarrota!
"Bundesbank de Alemania es de repatriar las reservas de oro en el extranjero para reforzar el control y combatir la crisis de divisas en el futuro", señala el periódico Telegraph de Londres... 
Alemania tiene 3.396 toneladas de oro, solamente superado por Estados Unidos. De ese total, el 45% está en manos de la Fed de Nueva York, y otro 11% en el Banco de Francia.  
"La mayoría de las reservas", explica Evans-Pritchard, "se almacenaron en el extranjero para la seguridad durante la Guerra Fría". Sólo una cantidad simbólica permanecerá en el extranjero en Nueva York y Londres "fines de negociación y liquidez".
La justificación fue presentado hace unas semanas por el miembro del consejo del Bundesbank Carl-Ludwig Thiele:  
Hasta Venezuela RETIRO SU ORO de USA e Inglaterra... Chávez prefirió que se lo robaran sus “Amigos” a que se los robaran los Banqueros de Nueva York...
Mas Sobre El Oro Alemán En Nueva York
La pregunta que me viene a la mente es:
¿Existirán Las 3,396 Toneladas De Oro?
Si las negociaron... como es de esperar... ya que el oro ALMACENADO NADA PRODUCE...
¡No Sé De Donde Van A Sacar El Oro!
No sé de nadie que esté vendiendo su oro. Todos los que conozco, están en la compra y tenencia de oro.
Esto significa, que con el fin de repatriar el oro de Alemania, ellos tienen que sacarlo del mercado o de las reservas de Estados Unidos... como paso en Inglaterra... 
Este informe ha sido anunciado HACE POCOS DIAS, pero fue dado aviso a los funcionarios Norte Americanos hace meses.
¡Ahora hay que unir cabos!  Sabemos qué el banco JPMorgan ha estado haciendo la venta de sus contratos de ORO FUTURO perdiendo dinero!
¿Porque Pierden Dinero?
La respuesta es obvia... Para mantener el precio del oro bajo. ¿A quién le interesa mantener el ORO BAJO?  Al Gobierno de Estados Unidos y también a casi todos los gobiernos...
Pero el precio del oro a estado subiendo en forma constante y ahora hay que sacar 3,996 toneladas de oro en el mercado sin afectar el precio. 
Si aumenta el precio del oro, demostrará que las reservas de oro de Alemania se han ido! DESAPARECIERON... OJO... hay que vigilar las noticias... 
La ultima repatriación del oro alemán fue de Londres... Gran Bretaña tuvo que entregar la mitad de su oro a Alemania.
Pero en aquel entonces, Gran Bretaña tenía el oro físico. Los EE.UU. NO SABEMOS SI LO TIENE...
Las reservas de oro de Estados Unidos, no han sido auditadas desde 1953 desde la presidencia de Eisenhower. Y solamente lo hizo UNA MUJER... ELLA SOLA VIO el ORO... ¿Lo habrá contado todo?... hmmm???
Me Pregunto ¿Por Qué No Se Ha Auditado?
¿No hay nadie interesado en saberlo...las 545 personas, que nos gobiernan; REPRESENTANTES Y SENADORES... no quieren saberlo o es que NO QUIEREN QUE LA GENTE SEPA??    
De todas formas... la retirada del Oro Alemán... AUNQUE APAREZCA... es una muestra de que ya NADIE CONFIA en los Estados Unidos  SOCIALISTA...
Que bajo las administraciones demócratas, ayudados por los Republicanos socialistas ha traicionando al CAPITALISMO...  y directamente traicionaron los siguientes países:
Chiang Kai-shek de china…
Corea que la dejó dividida...
Cuba...
Shah de Irán...
Viet Nam.
Somoza...
Además han permitido que todos los países Latino Americanos cayeran en manos de los comunistas de los años 60... incluyendo el REGRESO DE CHAVEZ después que le dieron el golpe de estado y lo tenían preso... fue Bush el que no reconoció el golpe... haciéndolo fracasar... (mala memoria que tienen algunos)

 UNO COSECHA LO QUE  SIEMBRA ... 

Una  mañana una mujer bien vestida se paró frente a un hombre  desamparado, quien lentamente levantó la vista... y miro  claramente a la mujer que parecía acostumbrada a las cosas  buenas de la vida. Su abrigo era nuevo. Parecía que nunca  se había perdido de una comida en su vida. Su primer  pensamiento fue: “Solo se quiere burlar de mi", como  tantos otros lo habían hecho ...

"Por Favor  Déjeme en paz !! gruñó el Indigente.. Para su sorpresa,  la mujer siguió enfrente de él. Ella sonreía, sus dientes  blancos mostraban destellos deslumbrantes.
"¿Tienes  hambre?" preguntó ella. "No", contestó sarcásticamente.  "Acabo de llegar de cenar con el presidente ... Ahora  vete."
La sonrisa de la mujer se hizo aún más Grande.
De pronto el hombre sintió una mano suave bajo el  brazo. "¿Qué hace usted, señora?" -preguntó el hombre  enojado.
“Le digo que me deje en paz” !!
Justo  en ese momento un policía se acercó. 
 "¿Hay algún problema,  señora?" -le preguntó el oficial ..
"No hay problema  aquí, oficial, contestó la mujer .. "Sólo estoy tratando  de ayudarle para que se ponga de pie ... ¿Me ayudaría?" El  oficial se rascó la cabeza. "Si, el Viejo Juan, Ha sido un  estorbo por aquí por los últimos años. ¿Qué quiere usted  con él?" Pregunto el oficial ...
"Ve la cafetería de  allí?" -preguntó ella 
"Yo voy a darle algo de comer y  sacarlo del frío por un ratito."
"¿Está loca, señora?"  el pobre desamparado se resistió. "Yo no quiero ir ahí!"  Entonces sintió dos fuertes manos agarrándolo de los  brazos y lo levantaron.
"Déjame ir oficial, Yo no hice  nada .."
"Vamos Viejo, esta es una Buena  oportunidad para ti," el oficial le susurró al oído ."
Finalmente, y con cierta dificultad, la mujer y el  agente de policía llevaron al Viejo Juan a la cafetería y  lo sentaron en una mesa en un Rincón de la cafetería.. Era  casi mediodía , la mayoría de la gente ya había almorzado  y el grupo para la comida aún no había llegado ...
El  gerente de la cafetería se acercó y les preguntó. "¿Qué  está pasando aquí, oficial?" "¿Qué es todo esto?
Y  este hombre está en problemas?"
"Esta señora lo trajo  aquí para que coma algo," respondió el policía.
"Oh no, Aquí no !" el gerente respondió  airadamente. "Tener una persona como este aquí es malo  para mi negocio !!!
El Viejo Juan esbozó una  sonrisa con sus pocos dientes. "Señora, se lo dije. Ahora,  si van a dejarme ir ?. Yo no quería venir aquí desde un  principio."
La mujer se dirigió al gerente de la  cafetería y sonrió .. "Señor, ¿está usted familiarizado  con Hernández y Asociados?, la firma bancaria que está a  dos calles ?"
"Por supuesto que los conozco",  respondió el administrador con impaciencia. "Ellos tienen  sus reuniones semanales en una de mis salas de  banquetes."
"¿Y se gana una buena cantidad de  dinero con el suministro de alimentos en estas reuniones  semanales?"
preguntó la Señora ...
"¿Y eso que le  importa a usted?"
"Yo, señor, soy Penélope  Hernández, presidente y dueña de la compañía ". “Oh Perdón  !! dijo el gerente ...

La mujer sonrió de nuevo ..  "Pensé que esto podría hacer una diferencia en su trato."
Le dijo al policía, que fuertemente trataba de  contener una carcajada. "¿Le gustaría tomar con nosotros  una taza de café o tal vez una comida, oficial?" "No,  gracias, señora", replicó el oficial. "Estoy en servicio".
"Entonces, quizá, una taza de café para llevar ?"
"Sí, señora. Eso estaría mejor".
El gerente de la  cafetería giró sobre sus talones como recibiendo una  orden. –
“Voy a traer el café para usted de inmediato  señor oficial "

El oficial lo vio alejarse. Y  opinó :"Ciertamente lo ha puesto en su lugar", dijo.
"Esa no fue mi intención “ dijo la señora ... Lo crea  o no, tengo una buena razón para todo esto".

Se  sentó a la mesa frente a su invitado a cenar. Ella lo miró  fijamente...
"Juan ¿te acuerdas de mí?"
El viejo  Juan miró su rostro, el rostro de ella, con los ojos  lagañosos "Creo que sí - Digo , se me hace familiar".

"Mira Juan , quizá estoy un poco más grande , pero  mírame bien", dijo la Señora .. "Tal vez me veo más  llenita ahora ... pero cuando tu trabajabas aquí hace  muchos años vine aquí una vez, y por esa misma puerta,  muerta de hambre y frio."
Algunas lágrimas se posaron  sobre sus mejillas ..

"¿Señora?" dijo el Oficial,  No podía creer lo que estaba presenciando, ni siquiera  pensar que la mujer podría llegar a tener hambre.
"Yo  acababa de graduarme en la Universidad de mi pueblo", la  mujer comentó. "Yo había llegado a la ciudad en busca de  un trabajo, pero no pude encontrar nada. Con la voz  quebrantada la mujer continuaba: Pero cuando me quedaban  mis últimos centavos y me habían corrido de mi  apartamento, deambulé por las calles. Era febrero y hacía  frío y estaba casi muerta de hambre, entonces vi este  lugar y entre con la mínima posibilidad de poder conseguir  algo de comer. " Con lágrimas en sus ojos la mujer  continuó platicando ...

"Juan me recibió con una  sonrisa". "Ahora me acuerdo!", dijo Juan. "Yo estaba  detrás del mostrador de servicio. Se acercó y me preguntó  si podría trabajar por algo de comer”. “ Me dijiste que  estaba en contra de la política de la  empresa".
Continuó la mujer.. "Entonces, tú me hiciste  el sándwich de carne más grande que había visto nunca... me diste una taza de café, y me fui a un rincón a  disfrutar de mi comida. Tenía miedo de que te metieras en  problemas. Luego, cuando miré y te vi a poner de tu  bolsillo el precio de la comida en la caja registradora,  supe entonces que todo iba a estar bien ".

"Así  que usted comenzó su propio negocio?" dijo el viejo Juan.

" Si, encontré un trabajo esa misma tarde. Trabajé  muy duro, y me fui hacia arriba con la ayuda de Mi Padre  Dios. Posteriormente empecé mi propio negocio el cual, con  la ayuda de Dios, prosperó .." Ella abrió su bolso y sacó  una tarjeta. "Cuando termines aquí , quiero que vayas a  hacer una visita al señor Martínez. Él es el director de  personal de mi empresa. Iré a hablar con él y estoy segura  de que encontrará algo para que puedas hacer algo en la  oficina ".
Ella sonrió. "Creo que incluso podría darte  un adelanto, lo suficiente para que puedas comprar algo de  ropa y conseguir un lugar para vivir hasta que te  recuperes.. Si alguna vez necesitas algo, mi puerta está  siempre abierta para ti Juan."

Hubo lágrimas en  los ojos del anciano. "¿Cómo le puedo agradecer? ,  preguntó.
"No me des las gracias", respondió la mujer.  "A Dios dale la gloria. El me trajo a ti."

Fuera  de la cafetería, el oficial y la mujer se detuvieron y  antes de irse cada uno por su lado... "Gracias por toda su  ayuda, oficial.." Dijo La Sra. Hernandez.
“Al  contrario", dijo el oficial, "Gracias a usted. Hoy vi un  milagro, algo que nunca voy a olvidar. Y ... Y gracias por  el café. ".....

Que Dios te bendiga siempre y no te  olvides que cuando tiramos el pan sobre las aguas, nunca  sabes cuándo será devuelto a ti .. Dios es tan grande que  puede cubrir todo el mundo con su amor y a la vez tan  pequeño para entrar en tu corazón.

Cuando Dios te  lleva al borde del acantilado, confía en él plenamente y  déjate llevar.
Sólo 1 de 2 cosas van a suceder, o él  te sostiene cuando tú te caes, o te va a enseñar a volar!

Con el poder de una frase! Dios va a cambiar las  cosas hoy y pondrá todo a tu favor. Si eres creyente,  reenviarlo, si tú no crees, elimínalo.

Dios cierra  puertas que ningún hombre puede abrir y Dios abre puertas  que ningún hombre puede cerrar ..
Si tú necesitas que  Dios abra alguna puerta para ti ... Comparte este correo  con otros.
Y recuerda ser una bendición para  otros.

  Dios ha  visto tus luchas, y dice que están llegando a su fin, una  bendición está viniendo en tu dirección. Si crees en Dios  por favor envía este mensaje a 20 amigos. No lo ignores,  estás siendo probado. Si lo niegas, acuérdate que Jesús  dijo: si me niegas entre los hombres te negaré delante del  Padre.

Dentro de 4 minutos te darán una  noticia.



Participan en “En mi opinión” Alberto L. Pérez “amenper”, Alexis Ortiz, Amb. Armando Valladares, Annie González, Ing. Armando López Calleja, J. Fresno, Bárbara Fernández, Carlos Bringuier, Efraín Sinaí, Eladio José Armesto, Enrique Enríquez, Enrique de Diego,  Erick Ruiz, Emigdio Prado, Gerardo Alfredo DeSola, Georgina López, Gustavo Rojas, Héctor Molina, Héctor Lemange Sando, Irmende Méndez, Jesús Angulo, Jesús Marzo Fernández, Jorge A Villalon, Jorge Aguiar , José y Marcia Caula, J Fresno, Luis Pensado, Lili Samways, Manny Fernández, Margarita Sánchez, María Argelia Vizcaíno, May De La Vega, Mil amigos de Holguín, Miriam Pinedo, Miriam Dopico, Margarita Sánchez, Marlene, Martha Ruiz, María  Lahullier, Olga Griñan, Oscar Díaz, Philip V. Riggio, Raúl Barroso, Reinaldo López  jr, Ricardo Samitier, Rolando Antonio Lara, Sergio Bello, Sofía Iduate, Sonia “Chuchin” Castell, Tony Flores, V J Marino, William Benard, Victor M Caamaño, http://news.yahoo.com, NoticieroDigital.com , CNN Español, LaNuevaNacion.com, TheBLAZE.com, The WesternCenterforJournalism.com, LastResistance.com, NewsMax.com, RealClearPolitics.com, GOPUSA.com, LIGNET.com, TheTradingReport.com, Beforeit’sNews.com,

Editor Lázaro R González Miño

lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com 
MrLazaroRGonzalez.blogspot.com 
https://www.facebook.com/lazarorg,

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)