No 850 “En mi
opinión”
Enero 16, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
The Honorable Trey Gowdy
Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi
The terrorist attack that took the lives of 4 Americans in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 was a terrible tragedy for our country. I commend you for accepting the nomination as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi. I have Digital News paper "En mo opinion" - "In my opinion" in the South Florida. Coral Gables. In English and Spanish, any information you want to publice please send it to me.
The mainstream media has created an illusion to disguise the truth behind what really happened at Benghazi. President Barack Obama and Fmr. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be relieved if you gave up on uncovering the truth.
You have repeatedly expressed your desire for this investigation not to be a media circus, but rather with the intention of bringing the truth out into the open for Americans to witness.
I trust you will do everything in the power to bring the truth to light. America needs a strong leader like you to expose the lies of the Obama Administration and the State Department.
We simply want to encourage you to do everything you can to lay the facts on the table and let the American people judge for themselves who is at fault.
Thank you for pledging your loyalty to our country, our flag, and our freedom.
May God bless you during this investigation.
Sincerely,
Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino
Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi
The terrorist attack that took the lives of 4 Americans in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012 was a terrible tragedy for our country. I commend you for accepting the nomination as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi. I have Digital News paper "En mo opinion" - "In my opinion" in the South Florida. Coral Gables. In English and Spanish, any information you want to publice please send it to me.
The mainstream media has created an illusion to disguise the truth behind what really happened at Benghazi. President Barack Obama and Fmr. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would be relieved if you gave up on uncovering the truth.
You have repeatedly expressed your desire for this investigation not to be a media circus, but rather with the intention of bringing the truth out into the open for Americans to witness.
I trust you will do everything in the power to bring the truth to light. America needs a strong leader like you to expose the lies of the Obama Administration and the State Department.
We simply want to encourage you to do everything you can to lay the facts on the table and let the American people judge for themselves who is at fault.
Thank you for pledging your loyalty to our country, our flag, and our freedom.
May God bless you during this investigation.
Sincerely,
Lazaro R Gonzalez Mino
Editor, “En mi opinion”
------------------------------
This petition was sent by a citizen powered petition tool at Western Center For Journalism: http://www.westernjournalism.com/polls-and-petitions/sign-petition-support-rep-trey-gowdy-benghazi-investigation/
------------------------------
This petition was sent by a citizen powered petition tool at Western Center For Journalism: http://www.westernjournalism.com/polls-and-petitions/sign-petition-support-rep-trey-gowdy-benghazi-investigation/
Trey
Gowdy Votes To Stop Executive Overreach And Hits Out At Obama In The Process
Will the House ever find the courage to
stand up for itself?
IMAGE:
HTTP://WWW.WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/AVATARS/13294/1DEE49EFD67D4F4DA5F1A9D1C5086BCD-BPTHUMB.JPG
Do you support Trey Gowdy
and his Benghazi investigation? Use this tool to email him and tell him what
you think. SEND EMAIL TO TREY GOWDY
Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC)
took to the floor of the House of Representatives Wednesday morning to block
President Obama’s executive action overreach on immigration. Gowdy voted for
H.R. 240 to fund the Department of Homeland Security through September 2015.
Gowdy said that millions of immigrants will receive benefits under the
president’s plan.
“President Obama announced one of the largest
extra-constitutional power-grabs ever by a chief
executive. He declared unilaterally that almost five million undocumented
aliens will receive deferred action under some new-fangled definition of
prosecutorial discretion, Madam Speaker. Not only that, not only escaping
consequences, he has decided to bestow benefits such as work authorization and
immigration benefits.”
Gowdy reminded the
House of Representatives that President Obama’s position may have changed since
he was a Senator, but the text of the constitution has not.
“This, Madam Speaker, despite the fact that the very
same president, over twenty different times, said he lacked the power to do
what he just did. And he repeatedly said he is not a king. Now, Madam Speaker,
his position may have changed, after the election I hasten to add, but the
Constitution has not. That document is clear, time-tested, and true. And it
says that this body passes laws and it is the responsibility of the chief
executive, Madam Speaker, to make sure that those laws are faithfully enforced.”
Gowdy said that Obama’s
executive action will set a precedent for future presidents, and the House must
exert its power to stop him.
“If this president’s unilateral extra-constitutional
acts are not stopped, Madam Speaker, future presidents will no doubt expand
that power of the executive branch and threaten the constitutional equilibrium.
But Madam Speaker, this is not a fight between Republicans and Democrats. It’s
not even a fight over immigration reform. This is a fight over whether this branch
of government will ever find the courage to stand up for itself. The same
document that this and all presidents swears to defend gives this body certain
tools, tools like the power of the purse. And it’s about d–n time we used that
tool. So I would ask you to oppose this motion to recommit, support the
underlying bill and I will yield back my time.”
The bill passed
236-191, with 5 not voting.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/trey-gowdy-votes-stop-executive-overreach/#pZHZZdjPJu381v3c.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/trey-gowdy-votes-stop-executive-overreach/#pZHZZdjPJu381v3c.99
Better Than Impeaching
Obama
Posted on January 15,
2015
image:
http://conservbyte.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/obama-tearing-up-constitution-300x204.jpg
obama-tearing-up-constitution
By Jay Taylor, Senior
Vice President – Liberty Alliance, LLC
With the weekly
scandals and daily lies, nothing seems more appropriate than impeaching Obama.
But to be really honest, he is just the typical political monster we the people
have allowed to be created in our current system. The power belongs to the
people and elected officials can only do what we allow them to do. The growth
of our large federal government didn’t happen overnight, but Obama has
certainly taken it to the next level. The time is NOW to stop Obama and all
future Obamas.
Our only choice is to
take the power away from the federal government once and for all. All
impeaching Obama would do is give us another power hungry tyrant looking for
the next conquest. We need to fix the federal government for all time and make
sure that this out of control government will never happen again.
With state legislatures
beginning their sessions across the nation this month, now is our chance to put
our own local elected officials on notice. They have the power to rein in the
federal government and they must use this power. Through the Convention of
States and their efforts to call an Article 5 Convention to propose amendments
to limit the power of the federal government we can restore America to what it
was meant to be. They have made the process extremely easy with the ability for
you to write your legislature here: YOUR State Legislator
They must hear from you
or nothing will happen. Government only acts to restrain itself when people
demand it. After you do your part in contacting your legislators, continue the
support by getting your friends and family to do likewise. The elections this
past year have put government on notice, but until we make them act nothing
will change. A balanced budget, term limits, and tax limits could become a
reality with your help. Do you think government would restrain itself unless we
force it?
More information and
lots of endorsements can be found at Convention of States. This won’t happen
without grassroots efforts. We have a great opportunity to save our county and
hope you will be part of it. Let’s send a shockwave of freedom across the bow
of big government. History is depending on you.
Amenper: Igualdad? No lo creo
En
una nueva iniciativa para promover el pluralismo religioso y la igualdad, la
Universidad de Duke planea emitir el llamado musulmán a la oración todos los
viernes en el campus. La llamada a la oración, también conocido como
"adhan" -se iba a ser cantado por la Asociación de Estudiantes
Musulmanes de Duke.
La
oración misma se fijó para comenzar este viernes a las 1:00 pm y que iba a ser
transmitido y amplificado desde la torre campanario de la capilla en el campus.
Cuando
mi nieto Marc se graduó de la Universidad de Duke, el inicio tuvo lugar en la
Capilla de la Torre.
Tuve
la oportunidad de ver los folletos que anuncian los diferentes servicios para
todo tipo de religiones en nombre de la diversidad. Me pareció razonable, si
era a diferentes horas y la asistencia fue por los alumnos de cada credo.
Pero
mi nieto me explicó que la mayoría de los estudiantes prefieren asistir a las
iglesias de su elección fuera de la escuela, para evitar los sermones políticos
de la diversidad y los derechos humanos predicados por el pastor durante el
servicio.
El
cristianismo tradicional fue pasado por alto por los derechos humanos, la
igualdad y la diversidad de los sermones religiosos. Pero querían que vaya más
allá; querían que sus cantos a ser por todo el campus.
Y
la Universidad aceptó en nombre de los derechos humanos de los estudiantes
musulmanes.
Pero
cuando hablamos de derechos humanos, vemos que el Islam y Mahoma no tienen ni
siquiera una gota de respeto hacia los demás. Cualquiera que niegue su fe, si
él es un anciano o una mujer débil, está sujeto a la muerte. Si una persona es
un Judio o un cristiano, se le ofrecerán estas tres opciones-Islam, la muerte,
o pagar el impuesto de la cabeza y la humillación. Vemos cómo se persigue a las
mujeres, humillados y tratados de manera inhumana. Francamente, el Islam está
desprovisto de la faceta más simple de amor o respeto.
Y
estamos hablando de un país como Irán que se considera la teocracia de pura fe
del Islam, no un estado musulmán radical como ISIS.
Propagandistas
musulmanes usan un lema atractivo que dice que el Islam es la religión de la
justicia y la igualdad.
Dinos
dónde la justicia y la igualdad es en el Islam cuando la vida de un musulmán
está a salvo incluso si mata a un cristiano intencionalmente mientras que un
musulmán sólo puede ser obligado a morir si asesina a otro musulmán.
La
razón, como dijo Muhammad es que "la sangre de los musulmanes sólo se
considera igual." Por lo tanto, ningún musulmán debería ser asesinado por
asesinar a un no musulmán.
Si
Muhammad dice-de acuerdo con todos los eruditos que "la sangre sólo de los
musulmanes son iguales" (tienen el mismo valor), tenemos el derecho a
preguntar: "¿Dónde, pues, está la igualdad?" Muhammad nos dice,
"me refería a la igualdad entre un musulmán y otro musulmán y no entre un
musulmán y un no musulmán."
Por
otra parte, vamos a ver que si un no musulmán sólo maldice a un musulmán, debe
o bien ser condenado a muerte o convertirse al Islam! Sin embargo, si un
asesinato musulmanes un no musulmán, él sólo pagar una multa.
En
su libro, "derechos de los no musulmanes en los Estados islámicos",
que ha sido traducido a muchos idiomas, este gran erudito afirma que hay que
distinguir entre los derechos de los no musulmanes y los derechos de los
musulmanes. . En las páginas 2-3, Abu Ala al-Mawdudi dice:
"Un
estado islámico ... es por su propia naturaleza obligado a distinguir entre
musulmanes y no musulmanes, y, de una manera honesta y recta, no sólo declara
públicamente este estado de cosas, sino también establece precisamente lo que
se conferirán los derechos sobre su ciudadanos no musulmanes y que de ellos no
van a ser disfrutados por ellos ".
"Lugares
de culto que no se permite que se construyan o ser renovado o que ser
reconstruido si se destruyen"
¿Puedes
creer que este veredicto injusto? Esto se practica en los países que eran
originalmente cristiana como Siria y Egipto. Estos países habían invadido y
ocupado por los musulmanes y tom por la guerra.
Debido
a la actitud del Islam contra los lugares de culto cristianos, descubrimos
persecución evidente y la desigualdad.
Ahora analicemos los derechos que no se supone que se otorgan a los no
musulmanes vamos a presenciar las peores prácticas de discriminación racial y
de segregación religiosa.
Así
que les pido la Universidad de Duke, donde es la diversidad? ¿Dónde está la
igualdad?
Mi
nieto, su esposa, y otros ex alumnos, así como los estudiantes actuales,
protestó.
Duke
se va a ver como un país musulmán de los viernes.
Bajo
presión, la Universidad de Duke ha revertido su plan para hacer sonar la
llamada a la oración musulmana de la torre de Duke Chapel campana.
Michael
Schoenfeld, vicepresidente de asuntos públicos y relaciones con el gobierno,
dijo que "estaba claro que lo que fue concebido como un esfuerzo por
unificar fue no tener el efecto deseado."
Por
supuesto, como no podía tener ningún otro efecto? ¿Cómo es que un erudito como
el señor Schoenfeld no se dio cuenta?
El
efecto fue a presentar la mayoría de los estudiantes a escuchar el canto
amplificado todo la universidad, mientras que los estudiantes cristianos NO
HACEN incluso tener la oportunidad de orar en el campus.
Fue
justo por el duque de revertirlo plan. Pero es una lástima que esta decisión se
produjo después de las protestas, ya que la primera iniciativa que fue una
imposición de una religión sobre las creencias del resto del alumnado.
Pero
esto es lo que estamos viendo en las universidades y escuelas de todo el país,
simplemente están ganando, están matando a los cristianos en sus países y
solicitando la aceptación y sumisión a su fe en nuestro país.
English versión. Amenper: Equality? I don’t think so
In
a new initiative to promote religious pluralism and equality, Duke University
planned to broadcast the Muslim call to prayer every Friday on campus. The call
to prayer—also known as “adhan”—it was going to be chanted by the Duke Muslim
Student Association.
The
prayer itself was set to start this Friday at 1:00 p.m. and was going to be
broadcasted and amplified from the Chapel bell tower on campus.
When
my grandson Marc graduated from Duke University, the commencement took place at
the Tower Chapel.
I
had the opportunity to see the pamphlets announcing the different services for
all kind of religions in the name of diversity.
I found it reasonable, if it was at different hours and the attendance
was by the students of each creed.
But
my grandson explained me that most of the students preferred to attend to the
churches of their choice off campus, to avoid the diversity and human rights
political sermons preached by the pastor during the service.
Traditional
Christianity was passed over by human rights, equality and diversity of faith
sermons. But they wanted it to go further; they wanted their chants to be all
over campus.
And
the University accepted it in name of the Human rights of the Muslim students.
But
when we discuss human rights, we see that Islam and Muhammad do not have even
one drop of respect for others. Anyone who denies his faith, whether he is an
old man or a weak woman, is subject to death. If a person is a Jew or a
Christian, he will be presented with three options—Islam, death, or paying the
head tax and humiliation. We see how women are persecuted, humiliated and
inhumanely treated. Frankly, Islam is
devoid of the simplest facet of love or respect.
And
we are talking of a country like Iran that is considered theocracy of pure
Islam faith, not a radical Muslim state like ISIS.
Muslim
propagandists use an attractive motto which says that Islam is the religion of
justice and equality.
Tell
us where the justice and equality is in Islam when a Muslim’s life is spared
even if he kills a Christian intentionally while a Muslim may only be required
to die if he assassinates another Muslim.
The
reason, as Muhammad said is that "only Muslims’ blood is regarded
equal." Thus, no Muslim should be killed for murdering a non-Muslim.
If
Muhammad says–according to all scholars–that "only Muslims’ blood is
equal" (have the same value), we have the right to ask, "Where, then,
is equality?" Muhammad says to us, "I meant the equality between a
Muslim and another Muslim and not between a Muslim and a non-Muslim."
On
the other hand, we will see that if a non-Muslim merely curses a Muslim, he
must either be sentenced to death or be converted to Islam! However, if a
Muslim murders a non-Muslim, he will only pay a fine.
In
his book, "Rights of Non-Muslims in Islamic States" which has been
translated into many languages, this great scholar asserts that we should
distinguish between the rights of non-Muslims and the rights of Muslims. On pp.
2-3, Abu Ala al-Mawdudi says:
"An
Islamic state ... is by its very nature bound to distinguish between Muslims
and non-Muslims, and, in an honest and upright manner, not only publicly
declares this state of affairs but also precisely states what rights will be
conferred upon its non-Muslim citizens and which of them will not be enjoyed by
them."
“Places
of Worship are Not Allowed to Be Built or to Be Renovated or to Be Rebuilt If
They Are Destroyed”
Can
you believe this unjust verdict? This is practiced in countries which were
originally Christian such as Syria and Egypt. These countries had been invaded
and occupied by Muslims and tom by war.
Because
of the attitude of Islam against the Christian places of worship, we discover
obvious persecution and inequality.
Now let us analyze the rights which are not
supposed to be conferred on non-Muslims we will witness the worst practices of
racial discrimination and religious segregation.
So
I ask Duke University, where is the diversity? Where is the equality?
My
grandson, his wife, and others alumni, as well as current students, protested.
Duke
was going to look like a Muslim country on Fridays.
Under
pressure, Duke University has reversed its plan to sound the Muslim
call-to-prayer from the Duke Chapel bell tower.
Michael
Schoenfeld, vice president for public affairs and government relations, said
"it was clear that what was conceived as an effort to unify was not having
the intended effect."
Of
course, how could it have any other effect? How come a scholar like Mr.
Schoenfeld didn’t realize it?
The
effect was to submit the majority of the students to listen to the amplified
chanting all over the university, while the Christian students don´t even have
the opportunity to pray in campus.
It
was right by Duke to reverse it plan. But it is a shame that this decision came
after the protests, because the first initiative that was an imposition of one
religion over the beliefs of the rest of the student body.
But
this is what we are watching at Universities and schools all over the country,
simply they are winning, they are killing Christians in their countries and
asking for acceptance and submission to their faith in our country.
What the Media Missed About
Obama’s New Proposal: It’s a Wage Cut for Workers
As
senior policy analyst in labor economics at The Heritage Foundation, James
Sherk researches ways to promote competition and mobility in the workforce
rather than erect barriers that prevent workers from getting ahead. Read his research.
Alex
Belica is currently a member of the Young Leaders Program at The Heritage
Foundation.
President
Obama just urged Congress to cut workers’ wages. Of course, the news headlines
did not report it as such. However, make no mistake: The president’s call for
mandatory paid sick leave would simultaneously cut workers’ pay.
The
president proposes requiring businesses to offer seven days paid sick leave to
their workers. That sounds great. But the president never explained where
businesses will get the money for it. In fact, the cost almost certainly will
come out of workers’ paychecks.
Businesses care about the total
compensation they pay workers. They care much less about how that compensation
splits between wages and benefits.Economists have
repeatedly found that when the government requires businesses to offer a
benefit, they do so – and take the cost out of workers’ pay.
Ironically, some of the best research
on this comes from Jonathan Gruber, the Obamacare architect who boasted that
the healthcare law takes advantage of Americans’ “stupidity.” Gruber’s research
finds that mandated increases in medical benefits and mandatory
workers compensation insurance
lead to offsetting reductions in cash wages.
Currently 91 percent of businesses already provide some form of sick
leave.
The
popularity of Obama’s paid sick leave proposal depends on workers not realizing
it ultimately comes out of their paychecks. If the president’s proposal becomes
law, many workers will lose the equivalent of seven days of pay a year.
The government should let employees
and businesses decide for themselves how to divide compensation between wages
and paid leave. Of course, most workers do want paid sick leave. Currently 91 percent of businesses already provide some form of it.
Workers
should be the ones who decide whether to work at a firm that offers lower wages
and more fringe benefits, or vice versa. The government should not make that
decision for them. Some workers value paid sick leave. Some have tight budgets
and would prefer higher wages instead. Individuals understand their own needs
much better than the government does.
Milton
Friedman observed that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Someone pays for
it. The president should remember that there is also no such thing as a free
day off.
Bobby Jindal: Muslims Must Admit 'Islam Has a Problem'
Muslim leaders must publicly condemn jihadist terror attacks like the
deadly strikes in France and concede "Islam has a problem," Louisiana
Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal says.
"If Islam does not support what is happening in the name of Islam, then they need to stand up and stop it," Jindal declares in a speech he'll give Monday in London, the Daily Caller reports.
"Many Islamic leaders argue that these are the acts of a radical few."
But, Jindal's speech at the Henry Jackson Society will argue, "Let’s be honest here, Islam has a problem."
"If Islam does not support what is happening in the name of Islam, then they need to stand up and stop it," Jindal declares in a speech he'll give Monday in London, the Daily Caller reports.
"Many Islamic leaders argue that these are the acts of a radical few."
But, Jindal's speech at the Henry Jackson Society will argue, "Let’s be honest here, Islam has a problem."
"I will warn you in advance that I’m going to say some things that
are not politically correct, so brace yourselves," he will say, the Daily
Caller reports.
"To be clear, I have no interest in defaming any religion, nor do I have any interest in assigning the maniacal acts of radical Islamists to millions of Muslims worldwide. I’m interested only in dealing with reality and facts.
"And the fact is that radical Islamists do not believe in freedom or common decency, nor are they willing to accommodate them in any way and anywhere," Jindal says. "We need to stop pretending otherwise. … We are fools to pretend otherwise."
According to the Daily Caller, Jindal will insist that Muslim leaders emphasize anyone who commits "acts of terror in the name of Islam is in fact not practicing Islam at all."
"If they refuse to say this, then they are condoning these acts of barbarism," Jindal says.
"There is no middle ground."
Jindal's remarks are in stark contrast to the Obama administration, which has carefully avoided using the term "radical Islam," insisting it doesn't want to legitimize terrorists' use of Islam for their attacks.
"To be clear, I have no interest in defaming any religion, nor do I have any interest in assigning the maniacal acts of radical Islamists to millions of Muslims worldwide. I’m interested only in dealing with reality and facts.
"And the fact is that radical Islamists do not believe in freedom or common decency, nor are they willing to accommodate them in any way and anywhere," Jindal says. "We need to stop pretending otherwise. … We are fools to pretend otherwise."
According to the Daily Caller, Jindal will insist that Muslim leaders emphasize anyone who commits "acts of terror in the name of Islam is in fact not practicing Islam at all."
"If they refuse to say this, then they are condoning these acts of barbarism," Jindal says.
"There is no middle ground."
Jindal's remarks are in stark contrast to the Obama administration, which has carefully avoided using the term "radical Islam," insisting it doesn't want to legitimize terrorists' use of Islam for their attacks.
In his speech, Jindal also will say America needs to get tough and stay
that way, the Daily Caller reports.
"I want America’s allies to trust us and respect us, and I want our enemies to fear us," he says. "Every day our enemies spend their time trying to avoid our justice is a day they are not plotting against us. And I fear that in recent years this has not been the case."
He will also take on a leftist notion that it's bigoted to expect immigrants to assimilate when they come to the United States, the Daily Caller reports.
"There was once a time when it was taken for granted in America that people who came to our country were coming to America to be Americans," he says. "But over time, a different philosophy has crept in, and that philosophy now dominates the thinking of the American left, and perhaps even the mainstream of thinking in Europe.
"This philosophy holds the view that it is wrong to expect assimilation, that assimilation is colonialist, assimilation is backward, and assimilation is in fact evidence of cultural bigotry and insensitivity.
"I want America’s allies to trust us and respect us, and I want our enemies to fear us," he says. "Every day our enemies spend their time trying to avoid our justice is a day they are not plotting against us. And I fear that in recent years this has not been the case."
He will also take on a leftist notion that it's bigoted to expect immigrants to assimilate when they come to the United States, the Daily Caller reports.
"There was once a time when it was taken for granted in America that people who came to our country were coming to America to be Americans," he says. "But over time, a different philosophy has crept in, and that philosophy now dominates the thinking of the American left, and perhaps even the mainstream of thinking in Europe.
"This philosophy holds the view that it is wrong to expect assimilation, that assimilation is colonialist, assimilation is backward, and assimilation is in fact evidence of cultural bigotry and insensitivity.
"They think it is wrong to expect that people who chose to
immigrate to your country should be expected to endorse and abide by your laws.
"They think it is unenlightened, discriminatory, and even racist to expect immigrants to endorse and assimilate into the culture in their new country.
"This is complete rubbish," Jindal said.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/bobby-jindal-radical-islam-muslims/2015/01/15/id/618922/#ixzz3OzfdGIpQ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
"They think it is unenlightened, discriminatory, and even racist to expect immigrants to endorse and assimilate into the culture in their new country.
"This is complete rubbish," Jindal said.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/bobby-jindal-radical-islam-muslims/2015/01/15/id/618922/#ixzz3OzfdGIpQ
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Amenper: La Sátira está protegida por la Libertad de Expresión
La
religión de los mormones, fue fundada por un hombre común, con un nombre que no
pudiera ser más común, Joseph Smith, con un nivel educativo que no pasó del
tercer grado.
La teoría
más aceptada por los adherentes es la promovida por Joseph Smith, que dice que
él tradujo el libro desde un antiguo conjunto de planchas escritas por
profetas, las cuales descubrió en un bosque, cerca de su casa en Palmyra, al
oeste del estado de Nueva York en 1820 después de que el ángel Moroni le
indicara ir allí.
También
dijo que el ángel le había dado unos cristales a través de los cuales tradujo
las planchas.
Los
críticos afirman que Smith basó varios pasajes de El Libro de Mormón en el
material que se encuentra en el libro Vista de los Hebreos, publicado en 1823,
con una edición ampliada en 1825, por Ethan Smith, y que todo es plagiado con
pequeñas diferencias.
La
creencia es que la tribu perdida de Israel, desembarcó en un lugar en América
donde ahora se encuentra Perú, y el libro cuenta la vida y la historia de la
tribu de dónde saca las doctrinas de la religión mormona.
Me
perdonan los mormones, sé que para algunos es su tradición y la aceptan como
tal, no hay burla en lo que dije arriba, es una descripción de la religión,
Pero si luce absurda y hasta cómica por su contenido, la burla es el
punto de vista del que la ve desde afuera, y no se puede imponer otro punto de
vista porque es una violación del derecho a cada persona a pensar como le
plazca.
Pero para
mí la historia de John Smith es bastante absurda, y que me perdonen Obama y el
Papa Francisco que dicen que tenemos que ser tolerantes que tenemos que ser
respetuosos que no podemos hacer burla de otras religiones y creencias.
Dice el
Papa que la libertad de expresión tiene limitaciones, y es evidente, no podemos
gritar “fuego” en un recinto lleno de gente.
Pero en
cuando a dar nuestra opinión de lo que consideramos absurdo de ciertas
religiones, y recibir la opinión de otros contra la nuestra, es un derecho que
está protegido por la libertad de pensamiento y expresión y que no se puede
limitar.
Si yo
creo en el cristianismo, pero otros se burlan de mi creencia, me duele, pero
tengo que aceptarlo, después de todo lo que ellos piensan no afecta mi
pensamiento, si lo afecta es que mi convicción o no es firme o no es real.
Pero
resulta que ahora después de los sucesos de Francia, la han cogido con la
cantaleta de que no se puede ofender las creencias de otros, refiriéndose a los
musulmanes.
O sea que
los asesinos lograron su objetivo, ganaron, ellos pueden imponernos su creencia
y hasta matarnos por nuestra “infidelidad” pero nosotros tenemos que respetar
su irrespetarle creencia tenemos que ser “tolerantes” que es el nuevo eufemismo
para decir que tenemos que callarnos la boca.
Charlie
Hebdo es una publicación de segunda, los chistes no me parecen cómicos, son
además de ofensivos y vulgares. Pero ahora todo el mundo quiere leerlos, debido
a la estupidez del asesinato de los caricaturistas.
Al que no
le guste mi opinión o mi creencia, acepto su manera de pensar, siempre que su
respuesta no sea violenta. Podemos aceptar una manera de pensar diferente de
los mormones, los santeros, hasta los testgigos de Jehová que nos tocan a la
puerta los sábados cuando estamos descansando, pero no podemos aceptar una
religión que nos quiere destruir porque no creemos igual que ellos..
Pero si
me declaran la guerra por mis creencias o por la falta de respeto a sus
creencias, para imponer la suya, ya no estamos hablando de religión o creencia
estamos hablando de guerra, estamos hablando de nuestra supervivencia.
Estamos
en la tercera guerra mundial, no importa que digan lo contrario, y el enemigo,
como nuestros enemigos en el pasado, no pueden ser respetados.
Porque
los que respetaron y fueron “tolerantes” con Hitler como Chamberlain en
Inglaterra y Pétain en Francia fueron responsables de la muerte de
miles de sus ciudadanos.
Obama Takes Heat
for Terror Approach
Terror seems to be his middle name…
Check it out:
Check it out:
The Obama administration drew
fire Thursday from a growing list of frustrated lawmakers over the release of
more Guantanamo detainees — this time Yemeni terrorists to the volatile Arabian
Peninsula — as concerns mount over the spreading threat of Islamic terrorism,
and the administration’s refusal to publicly call out Islam’s radical elements.
The Department of Defense
announced Wednesday that five Yemeni terror suspects held at Guantanamo Bay
were released — with four of the five heading for Oman, Yemen’s neighbor.
The release comes despite
knowledge that one of the two assassins who carried out the Charlie Hebdo
massacre in Paris traveled to Yemen in 2011, and met with the radical American
cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/36129/obama-takes-heat-terror-approach-gitmo-releases-threat-spreads/
Read more at http://cowboybyte.com/36129/obama-takes-heat-terror-approach-gitmo-releases-threat-spreads/
Arpaio Lawsuit Against Obama Amnesty Wins Accelerated Hearing
Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio's lawsuit challenging President Barack Obama's sweeping orders that protect
millions of illegal aliens — dismissed by a federal judge last month — is back
on the front burner, with an appeals court Wednesday ordering an accelerated
hearing in the constitutional case.
Larry Klayman, Arpaio's lawyer and founder of the watchdog group Freedom Watch, had argued an expedited hearing schedule for an appeal was crucial to prevent the immigration orders from taking effect this spring.
Larry Klayman, Arpaio's lawyer and founder of the watchdog group Freedom Watch, had argued an expedited hearing schedule for an appeal was crucial to prevent the immigration orders from taking effect this spring.
"It is a big victory to Sheriff Arpaio and indeed
the American people that the D.C. Circuit recognized the need for this case to
be quickly resolved before Obama's unconstitutional amnesty program goes into
full effect…" Klayman said in a statement.
"There are constitutional issues of great magnitude at stake and we are confident that the D.C. Circuit will put a legal stop to this illegal activity, which seeks to end-run congressional authority. I am grateful for Sheriff Arpaio's courage in pursuing this very necessary legal action."
"There are constitutional issues of great magnitude at stake and we are confident that the D.C. Circuit will put a legal stop to this illegal activity, which seeks to end-run congressional authority. I am grateful for Sheriff Arpaio's courage in pursuing this very necessary legal action."
On Dec. 23, Federal District Court Judge Beryl Howell
dismissed the suit filed by the self-proclaimed "America's toughest
sheriff'," saying the Maricopa County law enforcement official lacked the
legal standing to bring the case on constitutional grounds.
But Klayman later slammed Howell,telling Newsmax TV she was "highly political," basing her ruling in the important case on "her subjective politics."
The key appellate court ruling came the same day the House voted to block fundingfor the controversial executive order, which protects millions from deportation and lets them work legally in the United States.
The 236-191 vote came on a broad bill that would provide nearly $40 billion to finance the Homeland Security Department through the rest of the budget year.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/joe-arpaio-lawsuit-barack-obama-executive/2015/01/14/id/618665/#ixzz3Oval9736
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
But Klayman later slammed Howell,telling Newsmax TV she was "highly political," basing her ruling in the important case on "her subjective politics."
The key appellate court ruling came the same day the House voted to block fundingfor the controversial executive order, which protects millions from deportation and lets them work legally in the United States.
The 236-191 vote came on a broad bill that would provide nearly $40 billion to finance the Homeland Security Department through the rest of the budget year.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/joe-arpaio-lawsuit-barack-obama-executive/2015/01/14/id/618665/#ixzz3Oval9736
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Rick Perry to Newsmax: If Obama Won't Protect Border, Texas Will
The federal government has a constitutional duty to secure America's
porous southern border but if the Obama administration refuses to do so, Texas
Gov. Rick Perry says he's prepared to do what it takes.
"It
is clear that our federal government has failed in one of their most important
responsibilities and that is to secure the border with Mexico, in this case.
"Certainly
there is very good intelligence that Mexico and that southern border with the
United States has one of the potentials to allow individuals to come into this
country," Perry said Thursday during an appearance on Newsmax TV's "America's Forum," where he
discussed immigration, border security and terrorism.
In July, Perry deployed 1,000 National Guard troops to the South Texas
border to help stem the flow of illegal immigrants flooding the country through
the Rio Grande.
He pointed out Thursday that 55 percent of all apprehensions of illegal immigrants last year occurred along the 1,800-mile border between Mexico and Texas.
"That's the reason we've asked the president and Washington so often to do their duty, do their constitutional duty, send the resources, send the aviation assets, send the drones to defend and secure that border," he said.
"It can be done. You put the boots on the ground, the technology in the air, use the strategic fencing in the metropolitan areas, and that border can be secured. And Americans will sleep better knowing that their federal government is actually doing their constitutional duty."
He pointed out Thursday that 55 percent of all apprehensions of illegal immigrants last year occurred along the 1,800-mile border between Mexico and Texas.
"That's the reason we've asked the president and Washington so often to do their duty, do their constitutional duty, send the resources, send the aviation assets, send the drones to defend and secure that border," he said.
"It can be done. You put the boots on the ground, the technology in the air, use the strategic fencing in the metropolitan areas, and that border can be secured. And Americans will sleep better knowing that their federal government is actually doing their constitutional duty."
To ensure America's safety and security, Perry suggests three courses of
action the president should take:
"Opening up the XL Pipeline, opening up our federal estate to get the people working and getting out country more energy secure," he said.
"I'd add some corporate tax reforms that gave incentives to companies to continue to really look at expanding their manufacturing in the United States as these oil prices continue to go down and shale prices continue to push down the cost of electric power. There's no reason that America can't have a renaissance in the manufacturing side," Perry said.
"Then obviously, the third thing is border security. We have to have Washington doing its duty, but I tell people, I said listen, if Washington's not going to do its duty to secure the Texas and Mexico border, Texas will. We're going to send the resources that we need whether it's our law enforcement, whether it's our National Guard, to continue to send the message that Texas is going to do everything that it needs to do to keep its citizens safe and an extension of that."
Perry characterized President Barack Obama's absence at the Paris unity rally last week as a huge mistake and a missed opportunity to show the world, especially Islamic terrorists, the West's solidarity.
"The message that was sent, when you see (German Chancellor Angela) Merkel, when you see (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu, when you see the other leaders of the NATO countries — and America to not be there, for America's leader to not be there standing up and sending the clear message that Western values are going to be defended, Western values that the world needs to be strong about.
"Opening up the XL Pipeline, opening up our federal estate to get the people working and getting out country more energy secure," he said.
"I'd add some corporate tax reforms that gave incentives to companies to continue to really look at expanding their manufacturing in the United States as these oil prices continue to go down and shale prices continue to push down the cost of electric power. There's no reason that America can't have a renaissance in the manufacturing side," Perry said.
"Then obviously, the third thing is border security. We have to have Washington doing its duty, but I tell people, I said listen, if Washington's not going to do its duty to secure the Texas and Mexico border, Texas will. We're going to send the resources that we need whether it's our law enforcement, whether it's our National Guard, to continue to send the message that Texas is going to do everything that it needs to do to keep its citizens safe and an extension of that."
Perry characterized President Barack Obama's absence at the Paris unity rally last week as a huge mistake and a missed opportunity to show the world, especially Islamic terrorists, the West's solidarity.
"The message that was sent, when you see (German Chancellor Angela) Merkel, when you see (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu, when you see the other leaders of the NATO countries — and America to not be there, for America's leader to not be there standing up and sending the clear message that Western values are going to be defended, Western values that the world needs to be strong about.
"For him not to have been there was a huge mistake," Perry
said. "Not only politically, it was a huge mistake from the standpoint of
sending a message to those in the Islamic terrorist world that we are going to
stand together, we are going to defeat you and the Western values that the
world needs are going to be continued to be supported and defended."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/border-security-Texas-National-Guard-Rio-Grande/2015/01/15/id/618770/#ixzz3Ovbn0qKd
European
Rabbi: Change The Laws To Allow Jews To Defend Themselves
Rabbi Menachem Margolin warns of rise in anti-semitism.
IMAGE:
HTTP://WWW.WESTERNJOURNALISM.COM/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/AVATARS/33316/78CA689B2BD8CB8C1950E450B02D00CD-BPTHUMB.JPG
One of Europe’s most prominent Jewish
organizations is asking leaders on the continent to review firearms laws due to
the uptick of terrorism and anti-semitism across the continent. A letter making
the request comes after last week’s terrorist attack on satirical news
organization Charlie Hebdo, in which 17 people died.
European Jewish Association (EJA) General
Director Rabbi Menachem Margolin (pictured above) told The Washington Free
Beacon in an
article published Thursday that anti-semitism in Europe has been growing for “a
very long time.”
“We demanded from the European governments some
time ago that action should be taken [and] we’re not surprised to see the
results in Paris,” Margolin said. “Many people today are not coming to
synagogue because of the issue and they’d be more comfortable if they knew
people were trained to react in an emergency.”
In his letter to European leaders Tuesday, Margolin is asking
laws across Europe to be revisited so members of the Jewish community can carry
firearms “for the essential protection of their communities.”
“The Paris attacks, as well as the many
challenges and threats which have been presented to the European Jewish
community in recent years, have revealed the urgent need to stop talking and
start acting,” he writes.
We hereby ask that gun licensing laws are
reviewed with immediate effect to allow designated people in the Jewish
communities and institutions to own weapons for the essential protection of
their communities, as well as receiving the necessary training to protect their
members from potential terror attacks.
Let there be no doubt, we are asking that all
weapons will be issued for self-protection only, and to designated personnel
that will undergo thorough investigation and training by local authorities.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/european-rabbi-change-laws-allow-jews-defend/#febSHPgz3jKAk8P0.99
Bobby Jindal: Muslims Must Admit 'Islam Has a Problem'
Muslim leaders must publicly condemn jihadist terror attacks like the
deadly strikes in France and concede "Islam has a problem," Louisiana
Republican Gov. Bobby Jindal says.
"If Islam does not support what is happening in the name of Islam, then they need to stand up and stop it," Jindal declares in a speech he'll give Monday in London, the Daily Caller reports.
"Many Islamic leaders argue that these are the acts of a radical few."
But, Jindal's speech at the Henry Jackson Society will argue, "Let’s be honest here, Islam has a problem."
"If Islam does not support what is happening in the name of Islam, then they need to stand up and stop it," Jindal declares in a speech he'll give Monday in London, the Daily Caller reports.
"Many Islamic leaders argue that these are the acts of a radical few."
But, Jindal's speech at the Henry Jackson Society will argue, "Let’s be honest here, Islam has a problem."
"I will warn you in advance that I’m going to say some things that
are not politically correct, so brace yourselves," he will say, the Daily
Caller reports.
"To be clear, I have no interest in defaming any religion, nor do I have any interest in assigning the maniacal acts of radical Islamists to millions of Muslims worldwide. I’m interested only in dealing with reality and facts.
"And the fact is that radical Islamists do not believe in freedom or common decency, nor are they willing to accommodate them in any way and anywhere," Jindal says. "We need to stop pretending otherwise. … We are fools to pretend otherwise."
According to the Daily Caller, Jindal will insist that Muslim leaders emphasize anyone who commits "acts of terror in the name of Islam is in fact not practicing Islam at all."
"If they refuse to say this, then they are condoning these acts of barbarism," Jindal says.
"There is no middle ground."
Jindal's remarks are in stark contrast to the Obama administration, which has carefully avoided using the term "radical Islam," insisting it doesn't want to legitimize terrorists' use of Islam for their attacks.
"To be clear, I have no interest in defaming any religion, nor do I have any interest in assigning the maniacal acts of radical Islamists to millions of Muslims worldwide. I’m interested only in dealing with reality and facts.
"And the fact is that radical Islamists do not believe in freedom or common decency, nor are they willing to accommodate them in any way and anywhere," Jindal says. "We need to stop pretending otherwise. … We are fools to pretend otherwise."
According to the Daily Caller, Jindal will insist that Muslim leaders emphasize anyone who commits "acts of terror in the name of Islam is in fact not practicing Islam at all."
"If they refuse to say this, then they are condoning these acts of barbarism," Jindal says.
"There is no middle ground."
Jindal's remarks are in stark contrast to the Obama administration, which has carefully avoided using the term "radical Islam," insisting it doesn't want to legitimize terrorists' use of Islam for their attacks.
In his speech, Jindal also will say America needs to get tough and stay
that way, the Daily Caller reports.
"I want America’s allies to trust us and respect us, and I want our enemies to fear us," he says. "Every day our enemies spend their time trying to avoid our justice is a day they are not plotting against us. And I fear that in recent years this has not been the case."
He will also take on a leftist notion that it's bigoted to expect immigrants to assimilate when they come to the United States, the Daily Caller reports.
"There was once a time when it was taken for granted in America that people who came to our country were coming to America to be Americans," he says. "But over time, a different philosophy has crept in, and that philosophy now dominates the thinking of the American left, and perhaps even the mainstream of thinking in Europe.
"This philosophy holds the view that it is wrong to expect assimilation, that assimilation is colonialist, assimilation is backward, and assimilation is in fact evidence of cultural bigotry and insensitivity.
"I want America’s allies to trust us and respect us, and I want our enemies to fear us," he says. "Every day our enemies spend their time trying to avoid our justice is a day they are not plotting against us. And I fear that in recent years this has not been the case."
He will also take on a leftist notion that it's bigoted to expect immigrants to assimilate when they come to the United States, the Daily Caller reports.
"There was once a time when it was taken for granted in America that people who came to our country were coming to America to be Americans," he says. "But over time, a different philosophy has crept in, and that philosophy now dominates the thinking of the American left, and perhaps even the mainstream of thinking in Europe.
"This philosophy holds the view that it is wrong to expect assimilation, that assimilation is colonialist, assimilation is backward, and assimilation is in fact evidence of cultural bigotry and insensitivity.
"They think it is wrong to expect that people who chose to
immigrate to your country should be expected to endorse and abide by your laws.
"They think it is unenlightened, discriminatory, and even racist to expect immigrants to endorse and assimilate into the culture in their new country.
"This is complete rubbish," Jindal said.
"They think it is unenlightened, discriminatory, and even racist to expect immigrants to endorse and assimilate into the culture in their new country.
"This is complete rubbish," Jindal said.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Newsfront/bobby-jindal-radical-islam-muslims/2015/01/15/id/618922/#ixzz3Ozmbylk6
“En mi opinión”
No 850 Enero 16, 2015
“IN GOD WE TRUST”
Lázaro R González Miño EDITOR
No comments:
Post a Comment