No 697 “EN MI OPINIóN” Junio 25, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor
Letrero en la
frontera USA/Mejico que dice:
U.S. BORDER
LOTS OF FREE
STUFF AHEAH
HEALTH CARE . EDUCATION . HOUSING . FOOD . CONTRACEPTION . ABORTION . CASH
. OBAMA PHONES . MEDICAL AND DENTAL SERVICES
DEMOCRATIC
NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Amenper: Sólo
cuestión de Tiempo. El ataque químico a ciudades de Estados Unidos es
inminente.
Leemos esta noticia en el "Capital Hill Daily” Esta semana, nos
llega una noticia devastadora de Irak: los terroristas han incautado de
arsenales de armas químicas, incluyendo el mortal gas sarín.
Este es un suceso aterrador. Como Osama bin Laden antes que él, Baghdadi sabe que los radicales islámicos oran, casi sin cesar, por un líder para por la fuerza causar daño en la patria americana.
Y Baghdadi mismo es famoso por haberse burlado de los Estados Unidos durante los días antes de ser liberado de su detención en un campo de internación iraquí. Antes de que Obama lo liberó, el líder de ISIS amenazó las tropas americanas cuidándolo, diciendo: "Nos vemos en Nueva York"
Baghdadi sabe que con el fin de crear su largo sueño del califato y unir los gobernantes islámicos bajo una sola bandera, debe ser capaz de atacar lo que él llama al "gran Satán", los Estados Unidos de América.
Este es un suceso aterrador. Como Osama bin Laden antes que él, Baghdadi sabe que los radicales islámicos oran, casi sin cesar, por un líder para por la fuerza causar daño en la patria americana.
Y Baghdadi mismo es famoso por haberse burlado de los Estados Unidos durante los días antes de ser liberado de su detención en un campo de internación iraquí. Antes de que Obama lo liberó, el líder de ISIS amenazó las tropas americanas cuidándolo, diciendo: "Nos vemos en Nueva York"
Baghdadi sabe que con el fin de crear su largo sueño del califato y unir los gobernantes islámicos bajo una sola bandera, debe ser capaz de atacar lo que él llama al "gran Satán", los Estados Unidos de América.
Un asesino a sangre fría
Según un informe en el WND.com altamente respetado, "ISIS ha
capturado un arsenal de viejas armas químicas, la producción de armas químicas
de Al Muthanna es compleja y numerosa, como sus luchadores que avanzan a través
de la región controlada por suníes de Irak.
El acceso a una planta de producción de gas venenoso gas sarín y el
hombre con la experiencia necesaria para operar, es el resultado de una nueva
alianza entre los combatientes yihadistas brutal y Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri,
quien era un comandante militar superior y Vicepresidente del derrocado Saddam
Hussein".
Las armas de destrucción que los americanos no pudieron encontrar, y
que fue excusa de los liberales para criticar a Bush, ahora están apareciendo
en Irak
La alianza entre Bagdad y los restos de las fuerzas de Saddam ha creado un peligro muy significativo, ellos saben donde se encuentran estas armas, ya mucha de ellas están en su poder, en el poder de un asesino a sangre fría que ha jurado destruirnos, y que Obama liberó..
La alianza entre Bagdad y los restos de las fuerzas de Saddam ha creado un peligro muy significativo, ellos saben donde se encuentran estas armas, ya mucha de ellas están en su poder, en el poder de un asesino a sangre fría que ha jurado destruirnos, y que Obama liberó..
AMENPER PARECE QUE DICK
CHENEY TIENE LA MISMA OPINION QUE TU O TU TIENES LA MISMA OPINION QUE DICK
CHENEY…
‘FAR DEADLIER’: Dick Cheney
Predicts US Will Suffer a Terrorist Attack Worse Than 9/11
Posted on June 25, 2014
One thing for certain is that ‘violent
religion of peacers’ aren’t going away and it appears that, contrary to Obama’s
claims, they’ve become very emboldened in the last few years. Check it
out …
Former vice president Dick Cheney
believes that a terrorist attack even worse than the destruction of the twin
towers on September 11, 2001 is probable before the end of the decade.
Cheney appeared on Hugh Hewitt’s radio
show on Tuesday and was asked if he thought the United States would ‘get
through this decade without another massive attack on the homeland.’
‘I doubt it,’ Cheney said. ‘I think
there will be another attack and the next time I think it’s likely to be far
deadlier than the last one. You can just imagine what would happen if somebody
could smuggle a nuclear device, put it in a shipping container, and drive it
down the beltway outside Washington D.C.’
Hewitt wondered if the government could
continue in such a scenario and Cheney recalled a Cold War era plan for
constitutional government in the event of a nuclear attack.
‘Basically, it involved having a
government in waiting if you will ready to go in the event of nuclear
attack on the United States so that we could always maintain the
constitutional-based governmental authority,’ he explained.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/far-deadlier-dick-cheney-predicts-us-will-suffer-terrorist-attack-worse-911/#BhRIvjGQVQpqhFdd.99
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/far-deadlier-dick-cheney-predicts-us-will-suffer-terrorist-attack-worse-911/#BhRIvjGQVQpqhFdd.99
Amenper: Mitt Romney
Mitt Romney ha dicho una y otra vez que no tiene ningún interés en
correr para Presidente por tercera vez.
Pero, el domingo por la mañana, en CBS Bob Schieffer dijo que era muy
pronto para decirle que no a la idea de una campaña de 2016 de
Romney tan rápidamente.
"Tengo una fuente que me dijo que si no decide correr Jeb Bush,
Mitt Romney puede realmente intentarlo de nuevo", dijo Schieffer.
Si analizamos a los candidatos posibles realmente hay solamente dos
que se pueden considerar con posibilidad de ganar y capacitados para ser
presidentes. Estos dos Candidatos son Scott Walker, que todavía está
pendiente de que pueda ganar en las elecciones parciales este noviembre, y el
otro es Mitt Romney.
Ted Cruz tiene el impedimento que le estarán sacando que nació
en Canadá a la vez que tratarán de usan el sentimiento anti-hispano para
quitarle la oportunidad de ser presidente. Algo parecido le pasaría
a Marco Rubio, con el agravante que muchos conservadores no le perdonan que
haya presentado un plan de inmigración con los demócratas. Ben
Carson, además de no tener experiencia suficiente, es negro, y esto es anatema
para muchos republicanos del sur.
Santorum no sacó suficiente votos en Pennsylvania para re-elegirse
senador en una campaña en que una nieta mía trabajó, y no fue electo por sus
apoyos a los sindicatos, aunque es socialmente conservador, no es tan
conservador para los que lo conocen en todas sus facetas así que que podemos
esperar de su aventura como candidato. Además desde mi punto de
vista personal no me parece muy brillante. Esto se encargarán de sacárselo si
aspira en unas elecciones presidenciales como candidato del partido..
Huckabee y Chris Christie tienen poco chance, especialmente después de
la cama que le hicieron a Christie en New Jersey. Esto es algo
que es importante, la maquinaria demócrata destruye a los candidatos
republicanos. A Scott Walker lo están tratando de destruir con lo
que llaman contribuciones ilegales. No importa si esto ya ha sido revisado y
visto que es falso, ellos lo repiten y lo repiten hasta crear una imagen
negativa. El caso de Christie que es algo que debía de haber sido un incidente
secundario parroquial, lo convirtieron en una causa célebre.
Jeb Bush sería un buen presidente, pero también la prensa complaciente
y los demócratas se han dedicado a destruir y demonizar el nombre de Bush,
no importa quién lo lleve.
A Mitt Romney ya le sacaron todo lo que le tenían que sacar, y
los que creyeron que por ser rico y empresario no podía saber lo que era
mejor para América, ahora si tienen dos dedos de frente, se pueden dar cuenta
que lo que necesitamos es un hombre de experiencia y capacidad, no importa si
es pobre o rico, y que el organizador comunitario que escogieron, se ha portado
de acuerdo a su experiencia y capacidad, y los resultados son
palpables. La diferencia de votos populares fue pequeña en las
pasadas elecciones, y los votos electorales se perdieron en algunos estados
también por poco margen en los que ahora se pueden ganar. Así
que el pueblo no lo rechazó, simplemente la campaña de Romney no fue la
mejor en esta era en que la publicidad es tan importante. Todo lo
que necesita es un equipo de campaña mejor para tener la oportunidad de triunfo
ante el desastre de los años de gobierno demócrata.
Que no me digan que Mitt Romney es parte del "establishment
republicano" porque todo lo que le oí decir durante la campaña nos dejó
ver que es su propia persona y que no se ajusta a ninguna vertiente como
doctrina inflexible. Si esto no le gusta a los dogmáticos, no importa, los
que tienen independencia mental saben que no necesitamos un dogmático pero un
buen presidente que tome decisiones por su capacidad.
Para dogmático e incapacitado en la presidencia ya hemos tenido uno
por seis años..
Sin lugar a dudas la trayectoria de su vida, tanto en lo político como
en su vida privada me hace pensar que no es un seguidor de grupo, pero que es
un director de sus propio pensamiento, y que por un largo tramo es el candidato
de más capacidad para ser el presidente de los Estados Unidos.
Dios quiera que el pueblo de Estados Unidos tenga esta nueva
oportunidad para rectificar su error.
How President
Gowdy Solved the Middle East Problem
Back in 2021, right after Trey Gowdy’s
inauguration, Muslims at first fled away from the cities of Mecca and Medina on
the Arabian peninsula, because they generally sensed what was coming. And
they sensed correctly–Gowdy blasted those places to smithereens with a dual
nuclear bomb strike.
Immediately, of course, Muslims across
the globe rioted and struck as hard as they could at any and all possible
targets–both military and civilian, particularly in Western cities–with their
suicide bombs, automatic weapons, arson, assassinations, and various other
tactics.
The carnage around the globe was
extensive and awful, however not nearly as bad as it might have been had not
Western populations and governments already become so fed up, overall, with
Islamic aggression and terrorism that they’d been doing a lot of prevention and
pre-emptive preparation. An almost universal, lightning-fast crackdown
minimized the death toll.
Police and military units deployed
everywhere at top speed in the immediate aftermath of Gowdy’s devastation of
the ultimate Islamic “holy” sites, and the enraged, foaming-at-the-mouth
Muslims who massed in the streets of Western cities in response were
unceremoniously mowed down by tactical units using whatever means
necessary–drone strikes, helicopter gunships, mechanized and armored squads,
you name it.
Problematic Muslim clerics and known
jihad ringleaders living in Western countries, along with their already
watchlisted followers and lesser-recognized adherents, were ruthlessly rounded
up without a moment’s delay–not only by official units and personnel, but
equally by citizen militias and vigilantes who realized an almost uniform,
unwritten, across-the-board de facto deputation status. No one in any official
capacity whatsoever even contemplated objecting to ordinary civilians joining
in the effort to contain and defeat, with extreme prejudice, the imminent
Islamic threat. Those jihadis who mounted any kind of fight to try to
avoid being taken into custody were just killed instantly by overwhelming
force. Numerous hostages, most unfortunately, were sometimes lost when
their Islamic hostage-takers were summarily and hastily obliterated, lest the
enemy think such a tactic would in any way further their jihad by weakening our
resolve.
It was beneficial that so many
governments had already undertaken the process of cleaning house with regard to
the Islamic problem. Things had escalated so much and for so long that
everyone in their right minds simply knew without a doubt that a modern Crusade was not only necessary, but was moreover
the highest moral priority for civilized societies who wished to survive, in
the end, against the sustained and savage aggression and violent onslaught
waged increasingly for so many decades by bloodthirsty Muslim hordes.
Gowdy’s gambit of strikes against Mecca
and Medina was, on the surface, symbolic, however it was extremely effective
and ingenious in the strategic realm.
What took place after the strikes was
exactly what Gowdy and his generals had anticipated, and the fact that they so
carefully planned for the result, and for subsequent actions, is what made
their strategy so brilliant.
As expected, and as the radioactive dust
was still settling, it wasn’t long before virtually millions of Muslim warriors
swarmed toward Mecca from around the world. Obviously, they saw the
freshly vaporized site as that much more of a sacred rallying point; as the
place to coalesce and “make their stand” for Islam, as Western forces
maneuvered and feigned–pretending as if to want to move into, seize, hold,
and occupy the Muslims’ holy wasteland.
Being mostly the regressive, inbred
spawn of marriages between cousins (prevailing practice in Islamic societies),
the Mohammedan armies just weren’t that bright to begin with–but now they seemed
to glow that much more with the fervor of rabid,
wild-eyed, screaming Islamic religiosity as they stupidly flocked and teemed en masse to the poisonously toxic area where the nuclear
warheads had hit home.
That easily forecasted, brainless rush
toward Mecca (in the immediate aftermath of the U.S. nuclear strike) by legions
of the most hyper-rabid Islamic mujahideen from all corners of the globe accomplished two
key goals: First, their aforementioned exposure to whatever degree of
radioactive fallout, which need not really be explained in terms of its
advantage to the civilized world. Second, it gave Gowdy’s generals and
their allied counterparts from friendly countries such easy, ready targets, all
assembled in one big sandbox, for continued tactical elimination, that it was
very soon that the “soldiers of Allah” collectively realized their mistake.
Almost all of them were basically wiped out in a matter of days,
primarily from above.
Gowdy first deliberately drew them into
the killing field, then killed them.
Once the non-Muslim world actually took
the Muslim world up on its long-standing practice of all-out war, the war ended
rather quickly.
It didn’t take long at all for the
message to sink in, in the minds of Muslim leaders and followers worldwide:
The paper tiger had burned up, replaced by a real tiger.
Try as the ayatollahs, muftis, sheiks,
clerics, and would-be caliphs might, to rally the troops for ongoing and
endless jihad against the infidels, they were beaten back and beaten down by
every kind of laser-guided hellfire munition imaginable–until many of the
remaining mosques began to be converted into Christian churches by desperate
goatherders and merchants seeking a better way. Imams either fled, or
shed their dirty nightshirts and traded them in for Joel Osteen designer togs,
heeding the begging and beseeching of their communities’ plaintive pleas for a
new chance at life, and renunciation of Islam in hopes that the laser-precision
bombs and missiles might cease.
Pakistan’s nukes weren’t even part of
the equation once Israel took them out (along with the Pakis’ almost entire
command and control systems), simultaneous to Gowdy’s having blasted the black
stone cube of Mecca into mere metaphysical “carbon credits” toward the heating
and air conditioning costs of keeping Barack Hussein Obama housed in U.S.
federal prison, according of course to the comforts befitting a convicted
former American president.
Very few American servicemen’s lives or
limbs were jeopardized or lost during the final decisive campaign to defeat
Mohammedanism; almost none, in fact, compared with other global conflicts in
recent history. All it took, really, was the will to use the tools at our
disposal, to end an existential threat to us and to our children.
As for Islam, they still practice it in
cults and sectors throughout the Middle East, and elsewhere around the world,
but mainly it’s discussed in history books, and in articles online. Not
too many surviving denizens of even its birthplace are interested in being associated
with such a failed, vanquished, disreputable, and notoriously depraved
ideology. Like Nazism, and like the doomed, kamikaze emperor-worship of Imperial Japan of the
last century, it’s been sent to the dustbin where it belongs.
It’s unfortunate that so many people who
were guilty of nothing more than having been bred into mere supporting roles in
Islam had to die to bring the war to a close, but it’s that much more fortunate that so many millions, even
billions in posterity, will live free from Islam’s shackles and bloodthirsty
reach. Peace be upon you.
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/president-gowdy-solved-middle-east-problem/#bdfzqk4FFr3DRXrv.99
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2014/06/president-gowdy-solved-middle-east-problem/#bdfzqk4FFr3DRXrv.99
Amenper: "Glimpse"
en inglés quiere decir ver algo por unos segundos,o imaginarse algo por un corto
tiempo, la traducción que nos da el diccionario es "vistazo o ojeada" Dios quiera que esta palabra que escogió
la periodista Dorothy Rabinowit en su escrito del Journal de hoy sea una
premonición de los intentos de Hillary a la presidencia de este país, que sea
solamente un vistazo, algo que no se materialice.
Hillary quiere
hacerse pasar por moderada mientras apoya el aborto y el matrimonio homosexual,
quiere hacerse pasar por una Margaret Thatcher tratando de duplicar la victoria
de Obama por ser negro, y alcanzar la victoria por ser mujer al tratar de ganar
el voto de las mujeres, cuando la dama de Hierro siempre dijo que no le dieran
ventajas por ser mujer. Quiere
separarse de la política exterior de Obama cuando fue el arquitecto de esa
política.
Hillary te
falta mucho para ni siquiera parecerte a Margaret. En este escrito de Dorothy Rabinowit
en el Journal de hoy, nos deja ver un "glimpse" de lo que pudiera ser
la presidencia de Hillary, y como si tenemos la desgracia que suceda, vamos a
tener igual que ahora, un presidente que no se puede criticar por la coraza de
la raza, en el caso de Hillary la coraza de su vagina.
A Glimpse of
Hillary as President
It is hard to
imagine Margaret Thatcher complaining, as Mrs. Clinton did, that 'it was all
about my hair.'
DOROTHY RABINOWITZ
The past few weeks of Hillary Clinton's book tour have given Americans more than a modest
whiff of what a future Clinton presidency would bring. Nothing has brought home
with more immediacy the role we can expect gender to play in that
administration—or more to the point, the focus on anti-women bias about which
we would evidently be fated to hear a great deal.
That would come as a change, after what
will by then have been eight years of a different ruling focus in the White
House—that being, of course, the president's race. Years in which Obama administration
staff members, congressional allies and advocates in the political culture
regularly nurtured the view—when they weren't making outright accusations—that
vociferous opposition to this president, and his policies, was largely fueled
by white racism. Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) just last month declared that
opposition to ObamaCare came from people who don't like the president
"because maybe he's the wrong color."
Attorney General Eric Holder in turn delivered himself of bitter complaints
to Al Sharpton's National Action Network in April about the lack of
respect accorded him by a House committee. "What attorney general has ever
had to deal with that kind of treatment? What president has ever had to deal
with that kind of treatment?" Barack Obama had barely taken office, which he could not have
won without the vote of white America, when his attorney general charged that
the American people were "a nation of cowards" in their dealings with
race. Mr. Holder would go on to attack states attempting to curtail voter
fraud, to refuse prosecution of members of the New Black Panther Party who had
menaced white voters at a Philadelphia polling place, and to become, in all,
the most racially polarizing attorney general in the nation's history.
A
Hillary Clinton administration would bring change, yes, but much about the
change would feel familiar. We were given a small foretaste last week in a
statement by Lanny Davis, former special counsel to Bill Clinton and indefatigable
Hillary supporter. Mr. Davis had taken offense at the press description of Mrs.
Clinton's performance on a National Public Radio program—one that had not gone
smoothly for her. He was offended at certain language that had been used to
describe Mrs. Clinton's reactions when the NPR interviewer questioned the
consistency of her support for gay marriage. Reporters had described her as
"testy," "contentious" and "annoyed." Mr. Davis
opined that "had it been a man, the words 'testy' and 'annoyed' would not
have been used."
Mr.
Davis's reflexive discovery of insult to Mrs. Clinton—to women—in those words
comes as no surprise. The idea that certain words are demeaning to women,
because they're deemed unlikely to be used about men, is by now deep-rooted political
faith. Many people were doubtless unaware, until Mr. Davis brought the odd
news, that testy is a word not used for men—that hitherto standard descriptive
words and phrases might now be subjected to close examination and be rendered
illegitimate on the grounds of their potential offensiveness to women.
None of
this would come as a shock to anyone with experience of the speech codes and
all similar products of the ideological fervor on the nation's campuses
today—institutions of learning where any text, any class reference, can be
considered harassment or gender bias, should any student raise a claim of
discomfort. That ideological fervor wasn't going to be confined to universities
and colleges, and it hasn't been. Determining the words that may or may not be
used to describe a woman candidate for the presidency is only its bare
reflection—the beginning. We will be seeing that fervor full-blown should Mrs.
Clinton win election to the White House.
In her conversation with Diane Sawyer on ABC, Mrs. Clinton herself recalled the
unwelcome attention to her appearance during her travels as secretary of state.
People mentioned her hair, the scrunchie she wore to keep it in place. Try as
one may, it's impossible to imagine Margaret Thatcher complaining to an
interviewer, as Mrs. Clinton did, that "it was all about my hair."
There
are other signs that the tone of a Hillary Clinton presidency would bear strong
resemblance to that of Mr. Obama's. Under questioning during her recent media
interviews, the former secretary of state deflected all challenging
questions—when any were put—with her characteristic unyielding aplomb. Whether
queried on al Qaeda's triumphant march to power despite the administration's
long-continued assurances that al Qaeda was a spent force—or about disaster in
Bashar Assad's Syria, or her own role in the Benghazi catastrophe in Libya—she
exuded a serene assurance. And with it, the faintest hint of amazement that such
queries should actually be put to her—a cheery puzzlement that anyone should
think she had anything to do with what might have gone wrong.
"Let's
talk about what was accomplished," she briskly instructed Diane Sawyer,
who had asked about Syria and al Qaeda and Benghazi.
Mrs.
Clinton could not at that moment have sounded more like the current resident of
the White House. Or more like a future one who would be, much like her
predecessor, a leader of boundless self-confidence. One also inclined, when
presented with the evidence of catastrophic policies of her own making, to
wonder what any of that had to do with her.
Ms. Rabinowitz is a member of the
Journal's editorial board.
$3,500’000,000.00
DE ESTA FORMA ES QUE LOS CUBANOS
QUIEREN ELIMINAR A FIDEL CASTRO Y SU RECUA DE DEGENERADOS QUE APLASTAN A LOS
CUBANOS EN CUBA Y EXPLOTAN A LOS CUBANOS DE MIAMI. EN FIN SE RIEN DE TODOS…
MENOS LOS QUELOS HEMOS TIRADO A MIERDA. SI LO SIGUEN HACIENDO ESTE REGIMEN
ASESINO Y DESPOTICO ESTARA AHÍ MILES DE ANOS, AUNQUE SE MUERA EL DEGENERADO EN
JEFE. “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño
Enviado por Georgina López. Emigrantes enviaron a la Isla en 2013 más de 3.500
millones en 'remesas en especie'
|
|
You Are Not Going To Believe What Oprah Just Said
About Michelle Obama…
This is a behind the scenes look...
In
a follow-up to his bestselling Obama exposé, ‘The Amateur’ author Edward
Klein is back with a new book detailing the animosity between the Clintons and
the Obamas.
One
particularly interesting passage in
the book, titled ‘Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas,’ includes quotes
from media mogul Oprah Winfrey, in which she lets loose on the current first
lady and Obama advisor Valarie Jarrett.
“They’re
always badgering you for something,” Klein quotes Winfrey as asserting. “I’ve
spent much of my life fending off powerful and not-so powerful people who want
things from me. But these two women are something else again. They’re walking
agendas. Their wish list never stops.”
According
to Klein’s account, Winfrey described spending time with the pair as
“tiresome.”
Furthermore,
the book alleges the one-time vocal Obama supporter now feels “slighted” by the
first family.
Klein cites
one of Winfrey’s friends who claims the treatment she has received since Obama’s
inauguration has not only been “thoughtless,” but “unfair and hurtful.”
In
contrast, Klein concludes Winfrey is far more loyal to expected 2016
presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. While fielding endorsement requests
from potential nominees including Joe Biden, the book states Winfrey is
considering joining forces with a Clinton candidacy.
“I
have a much warmer relationship with Hillary than I do with either Michelle or
Barack,” Winfrey reportedly said. “The Clintons make me feel at ease 100
percent of the time. But even when the Obamas think they are being charming,
they hold you at arm’s length. They make me jumpy, even when they obviously
don’t mean to.”
“Bill
and Hillary have both had long talks with Oprah,” Klein quotes one source in
his book. “They’ve made it clear they’re planning a run for the White House and
would appreciate her support.”
The
insider further states that the Clintons hope to receive the same enthusiastic
endorsement Winfrey gave Obama in 2008.
“They
think her support is worth a million votes, and maybe more,” the source
reportedly stated. “Hillary says she’s convinced that Oprah is going to come on
board.”
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/oprah-reveals-contempt-michelle-obama-new-book/#CEjwhudlSyAPyVuZ.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/oprah-reveals-contempt-michelle-obama-new-book/#CEjwhudlSyAPyVuZ.99
AMENPER: La Burbuja Racial
Cuando una agencia del gobierno, sobre todo uno
tan poderosa como el IRS, se dedica a algo que incluso las personas que
simpatizan con el gobierno se ve raro y sospechoso, debe de incumbir a todos
los medios de comunicación nacionales para preguntar agresivamente más
preguntas. Los republicanos en el Congreso están haciendo preguntas.
Creo que con una administración diferente, una
que fuera una administración republicana, o inclusive otra administración
demócrata, esta historia sería una obsesión nacional. Y en su lugar, se está
haciendo una cobertura superficial aquí y allá con un silencio cómplice. .
Pero merece mucho más preguntas, es lógico. Tiene
que haber más claridad, no pueden mantener el pueblo en la oscuridad, y no me
estoy refiriendo al color de la piel del presidente y de sus principales
asesores, me refiero a la oscuridad en las explicaciones, en la descarada respuesta
de los oficiales del IRS de que "perdieron" los E Mail de Lois
Lerner. Si hay precedentes como el caso de los tapes de Nixon,
¿Por qué hablar de impugnación es anatema en esta administración?.
Esto es una cuestión de racismo a la inversa, y esto
es también algo que se mantiene en la oscuridad, nadie habla de esto.
Hay una sola y simple razón por los que este
presidente no se puede impugnar y esta es porque es negro. Porque es el
primer presidente negro de los Estados Unidos.
No es racismo el decirlo, es racismo el hecho
evidente.
El complejo de culpabilidad de este país por el
abuso de la segregación, es una coraza que el peor presidente que ha tenido los
Estados Unidos usa como una protectora burbuja racial para proteger una
administración inepta en lo domestico donde constantemente se violan los
derechos civiles fundamentales de los que no comulgan con ellos y criminal en
la política exterior, porque ha costado y costará la vida de personas
inocentes, de civiles y nuestros soldados.
WATCH MSNBC (Yes, MSNBC!) Hammer Obama Over His Lies
About Iraq And Al Qaeda
"You said it was stable."
Morning Joe co-host Mika
Brzezinski pressed President Obama on the deteriorating situation in Iraq: “Is
this part of reality going back into Iraq? You said that the war was
ended in Iraq. You said al-Qaeda was decimated. You said it was stable.”
“It was,” Obama replied.
“But just because something is stable two years ago or four years ago doesn’t
mean it’s stable right now. It is ultimately up to
the Iraqi leadership to pull the politics of the country back together
again. That doesn’t mean that we re-occupy Iraq.”
Obama said that the U.S. will have to deal
with some of the best and some of the worst “impulses” in the region.
“What we’re not going to be able to do is to play ‘whack-a-mole’ and chase
wherever extremists appear and occupy those countries for long periods of
time.” The President added that as the world’s lone superpower, the
ability to solve other country’s problems exceeds our capability.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/brzezinski-obama-said-al-qaeda-decimated-iraq-stable/#v6XFY43VVARYzXz8.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/brzezinski-obama-said-al-qaeda-decimated-iraq-stable/#v6XFY43VVARYzXz8.99
Watch: Rep. Jim Jordan Takes His Turn To Roast IRS
Koskinen's seat has to be getting pretty
toasty..
We sure hope
John Koskinen is OK with heat. Because he is getting grilled long and hard by representatives,
and it’s only a matter of time before legal action takes place.
This
time, Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) was grillmaster during a House committee
hearing, repeatedly asking why IRS Commissioner John Koskinen waited nearly two
months to tell Congress that the agency lost Lois Lerner’s crucial emails due
to a hard drive “crash.”
Koskinen
claimed he didn’t tell Congress, the White House, the FBI, the Inspector
General, or any other outside agencies about losing the emails until the IRS’s
report last week, after Congress asked them about it.
The
Congressman later asked: at which point does this withholding of “critical
information” become an obstruction of justice?
“We’ve
been after this for 13 months,” Jordan said. “We subpoenaed six months ago for
this, you had a hearing on the 26th where everyone went after you and said ‘We
want all the emails,’ and you assured us you’d get them all to us; and then you
learned you can’t, and you don’t tell anybody?”
“This
is ridiculous,” Jordan added.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-rep-jim-jordan-takes-turn-roast-irs/#Dt3w2sORGFozw6Sd.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/watch-rep-jim-jordan-takes-turn-roast-irs/#Dt3w2sORGFozw6Sd.99
AMENPER: Conferencia
de Prensa de Supermán
Supermán y su
compañera Lois Lane, han hecho declaraciones en una conferencia de prensa
el pasado Martes.
Desde su retiro en
Metrópolis, Supermán se ha quejado que Lois ha recibido numerosos E Mails
derogatorios a su persona, así como de que sus E Mail han sido tratadoe de der
robados por diferentes “hackers”
Supermán considera que
estos hechos han sido causados por una confusión en cuanto a la identidad de
Lois Lane. “Quiero aclarar que Lois nunca ha tenido ninguna posición
en el IRS o en el gobierno de Obama y que nunca ha efectuado investigaciones
políticas a grupos conservadores.
Esta confusión debe de
ser porque hay personas que considera que Lois Lerner es Lois Lane por la
similitud de los nombres-
El hombre de acero
dijo que espera que con esta aclaración no se hable más de los E Mail de Lois
Lane y que se preocupen más de los E Mails de Lois Lerner.
‘America Is an Islamic Country’ – Obama Homeland
Security Adviser Insists
Last fall, a top Obama Homeland
Security adviser generated controversy when he wrote that the U.S. Constitution
was “Islamically compliant.”
Mohamed Elibiary returned to the topic in a Saturday
morning Twitter post: “… I said America was an Islamic country not a Muslim
country. Pls study up on the difference b4 attacking me.” The post appears to
have been deleted from Elibiary’s Twitter feed.
Elibiary declined to explain what he meant when the
Investigative Project wrote to him asking for clarification. The tweets are
puzzling considering that there were 2.6 million Muslims in the United States
as of the 2010 census – roughly less than .2 percent of the world’s 1.6 billion
Muslims.
A source close to Elibiary told the IPT, however, that
the Homeland Security adviser meant to say that he feels there is nothing in
the U.S. Constitution and the American system that runs contrary to Islam.
“His entire attempt to repeatedly say that ‘American
is Islamic’ is pure deception in the context of an Islamist ideologue like him
who has not only never critiqued Islamism but rather continuously advocates for
it,” Jasser said. “In fact it is not. American Islamists like Elibiary have
consistently rejected debate with other anti-Islamist Muslims about the threat
of Islamism and the way to separate Islam from Islamism.
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Read more at http://minutemennews.com/2014/06/america-islamic-country-obama-homeland-security-adviser-insists/#iWdMyRBF1e9CD0mw.99
Republicans In This State Just Took Steps To Impeach
Obama
“I’ve got a thick book on impeachable
offenses..."
According
to recent reports,
South Dakota Republicans joined together to pass a resolution demanding Barack
Obama be impeached. Among the reasons listed is the recent release of five
dangerous terrorists in a deal with
the Taliban to return Bowe Bergdahl, a hostage described by his fellow soldiers
as an Army deserter.
The
state’s Republican Party drafted the resolution to convince “our U.S.
Representatives to initiate impeachment proceedings against the president of
the United States.”
In
a relatively close 191-176 vote, party delegates approved the resolution
sponsored by Sioux Falls Republican Allen Unruh. In addition to the Taliban
trade, the document listed allegedly impeachable offenses including the
misrepresentation of ObamaCare and the Environmental Protection Agency’s targeting of
America’s coal-fired power plants.
“I’ve
got a thick book on impeachable offenses of the president,” Unruh asserted.
Butte
County resident Larry Klipp also supported the measure, saying he “will pray
for” anyone who failed to see the “traitorous scandals” that have defined this
administration.
It
remains to be seen whether the resolution will have any bearing among the
state’s legislators. South Dakota has but one U.S. Representative, Kristi Noem,
who has not been receptive to the idea of pursuing impeachment.
A
spokesperson for the congresswoman indicated that she “believes the best way
for Congress to hold the president accountable is to continue aggressive
committee oversight and investigations” into the aforementioned scandals.
She
is far from the only state Republican unwilling to support the idea. David
Wheeler, one of the dissenting delegates in the resolution vote, contended that
pursuing impeachment would essentially be a political move that would
ultimately only damage the GOP.
“By
doing this, we would look petty,” he concluded, “like we can’t achieve our
political goals through the political process.”
Larry
Eliason also disagreed with the move, though he admitted he has disagreed with
every decision Obama has made during his presidency – with the exception of his
pet adoption.
While
this resolution might ultimately fail to gain traction in any definable way, it
is yet another example of the growing trend among experts and
elected officials who
believe Obama’s actions as president warrant a criminal investigation.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republicans-state-just-took-steps-impeach-obama/#zEriEf1400SjZ5m6.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/republicans-state-just-took-steps-impeach-obama/#zEriEf1400SjZ5m6.99
SECURE AMERICA
NOW:
Dear Lazaro R Gonzalez --
President Obama’s time
is up.
The actions of the Obama Administration have gone unchecked for far too long and inaction is no longer an option. It is our responsibility to hold Obama accountable for his repeated failures in office.
Join with Secure America Now as we call Congress to demand they file articles of impeachment against the President. From the Benghazi cover-up to the Bergdahl swap, President Obama has repeatedly risked the lives and liberties of all Americans. Obama has deceived Congress and the American people, breaking the law and facing no penalty for his wrongdoing. Impeachment starts with the House of Representatives, but they will not act unless we rally together and make our voices heard!
Call Congress today and tell them that Americans are ready to impeach the President.Just a few minutes on the phone can help us condemn President Obama's unlawful actions by compelling Congress to start the impeachment process. We cannot allow the Obama Administration to carry on with their culture of cover-ups, scandals and back room deals.
Obama’s actions have a consequence: impeachment. Call your Representative now and remind them that the American people want to see Obama held responsible and impeached!
Together we can make our voices heard and finally impeach President Obama.
The actions of the Obama Administration have gone unchecked for far too long and inaction is no longer an option. It is our responsibility to hold Obama accountable for his repeated failures in office.
Join with Secure America Now as we call Congress to demand they file articles of impeachment against the President. From the Benghazi cover-up to the Bergdahl swap, President Obama has repeatedly risked the lives and liberties of all Americans. Obama has deceived Congress and the American people, breaking the law and facing no penalty for his wrongdoing. Impeachment starts with the House of Representatives, but they will not act unless we rally together and make our voices heard!
Call Congress today and tell them that Americans are ready to impeach the President.Just a few minutes on the phone can help us condemn President Obama's unlawful actions by compelling Congress to start the impeachment process. We cannot allow the Obama Administration to carry on with their culture of cover-ups, scandals and back room deals.
Obama’s actions have a consequence: impeachment. Call your Representative now and remind them that the American people want to see Obama held responsible and impeached!
Together we can make our voices heard and finally impeach President Obama.
Thank
you,
“Aquí sí que se comieron el mecate”
AMERICAN PROSPERITY NETWORK: Militant Islamic Group ISIS Trained at U.S. Base in Jordan.
Jordanian officials recently revealed that members of
the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (also known as ISIS) were trained in 2012
by U.S. military instructors at a secret base in Jordan.
This militant Sunni group has made violent advances
through northern and western Iraq, videotaping executions of civilians and
soldiers and taking over Mosul – Iraq’s second largest city.
ISIS’ ultimate goal is to create an Islamic caliphate
state in Iraq and Syria based on Sharia law.
World
Net Daily reported that
in February 2012 the U.S., Turkey and Jordan ran a training base for Syrian
rebels in the northern Jordan town of Safawi. This report has been corroborated
by Reuters and the German weekly Der Spiegel.
Of course, this raises the obvious question: Why
did the American military train dangerous Islamic militants?
Answer: Because they were being trained with the
intent of overthrowing the Syrian government and President Bashar al-Assad.
Jordanian officials claimed these Syrian rebels were
screened to ensure they had no ties to Al-Qaeda or any other overly radical
Islamic group. They also said that this training had no intention of being used
in Iraq.
However, these good foreign policy intentions have
backfired on the Obama Administration in a big way. Especially since the President
declared an end to combat operations in Iraq nearly four years ago.
It appears that these U.S.-trained forces were better
prepared than their Iraqi counterparts. Many American-trained Iraqi soldiers
threw down their weapons and uniforms or didn’t offer much resistance to the
invading Islamic forces.
The Jordanian officials who spoke to World Net Daily
are also concerned this sectarian violence will spill over into their country.
It’s hard to put the outrage about this scandal into
words, but we’ll give it a shot. Based on the numerous scandals before this
one, the Obama Administration is the most corrupt — and either the most
incompetent or treasonous — in American history.
NESTOR
DAN: SHE IS A REAL TEACHER!!!
In September of 2005, on the first day of school, Martha Cothren, a History teacher at Robinson High School in Little Rock , did something not to be forgotten. On the first day of school, with the permission of the school superintendent, the principal and the building supervisor, she removed all of the desks in her classroom. When the first period kids entered the room they discovered that there were no desks.
> > > 'Ms. Cothren, where are our desks?'
> > >
> > > She replied, 'You can't have a desk until you tell me how you earn the right to sit at a desk.'
> > > They thought, 'Well, maybe it's our grades.' 'No,' she said.
> > > 'Maybe it's our behavior.' She told them, 'No, it's not even your behavior.'
> > >
> > > And so, they came and went, the first period, second period, third period. Still no desks in the classroom. Kids called their parents to tell them what was happening and by early afternoon television news crews had started gathering at the school to report about this crazy teacher who had taken all the desks out of her room.
> > >
> > > The final period of the day came and as the puzzled students found seats on the floor of the desk-less classroom. Martha Cothren said, 'Throughout the day no one has been able to tell me just what he or she has done to earn the right to sit at the desks that are ordinarily found in this classroom. Now I am going to tell you.'
> > >
> > > At this point, Martha Cothren went over to the door of her classroom and opened it. Twenty-seven (27) U.S. Veterans, all in uniform, walked into that classroom, each one carrying a school desk. The Vets began placing the school desks in rows, and then they would walk over and stand alongside the wall. By the time the last soldier had set the final desk in place those kids started to understand, perhaps for the first time in their lives, just how the right to sit at those desks had been earned.
> > >
> > > Martha said, 'You didn't earn the right to sit at these desks. These heroes did it for you. They placed the desks here for you. They went halfway around the world, giving up their education and interrupting their careers and families so you could have the freedom you have. Now, it's up to you to sit in them. It is your responsibility to learn, to be good students, to be good citizens. They paid the price so that you could have the freedom to get an education. Don't ever forget it.'
> > >
> > > By the way, this is a true story. And this teacher was awarded Veterans of Foreign Wars Teacher of the Year for the State of Arkansas in 2006. She is the daughter of a WWII POW.
In September of 2005, on the first day of school, Martha Cothren, a History teacher at Robinson High School in Little Rock , did something not to be forgotten. On the first day of school, with the permission of the school superintendent, the principal and the building supervisor, she removed all of the desks in her classroom. When the first period kids entered the room they discovered that there were no desks.
> > > 'Ms. Cothren, where are our desks?'
> > >
> > > She replied, 'You can't have a desk until you tell me how you earn the right to sit at a desk.'
> > > They thought, 'Well, maybe it's our grades.' 'No,' she said.
> > > 'Maybe it's our behavior.' She told them, 'No, it's not even your behavior.'
> > >
> > > And so, they came and went, the first period, second period, third period. Still no desks in the classroom. Kids called their parents to tell them what was happening and by early afternoon television news crews had started gathering at the school to report about this crazy teacher who had taken all the desks out of her room.
> > >
> > > The final period of the day came and as the puzzled students found seats on the floor of the desk-less classroom. Martha Cothren said, 'Throughout the day no one has been able to tell me just what he or she has done to earn the right to sit at the desks that are ordinarily found in this classroom. Now I am going to tell you.'
> > >
> > > At this point, Martha Cothren went over to the door of her classroom and opened it. Twenty-seven (27) U.S. Veterans, all in uniform, walked into that classroom, each one carrying a school desk. The Vets began placing the school desks in rows, and then they would walk over and stand alongside the wall. By the time the last soldier had set the final desk in place those kids started to understand, perhaps for the first time in their lives, just how the right to sit at those desks had been earned.
> > >
> > > Martha said, 'You didn't earn the right to sit at these desks. These heroes did it for you. They placed the desks here for you. They went halfway around the world, giving up their education and interrupting their careers and families so you could have the freedom you have. Now, it's up to you to sit in them. It is your responsibility to learn, to be good students, to be good citizens. They paid the price so that you could have the freedom to get an education. Don't ever forget it.'
> > >
> > > By the way, this is a true story. And this teacher was awarded Veterans of Foreign Wars Teacher of the Year for the State of Arkansas in 2006. She is the daughter of a WWII POW.
NELSON HORTA REPORTA…
Pide el Presidente del Partido Republicano la abolición del IRS
• Reince Priebus dice estar de acuerdo con una re-evaluación total del
sistema tributario
MIAMI
25 DE JUNIO DE 2014, nhr.com—El Presidente del Comité Nacional Republicano
Reince Priebus está pidiendo la abolición del servicio de rentas internas
(IRS), según nelsonhortareporta.com ha podido conocer.
“Una
re-evaluación total de nuestro sistema tributario es importante y necesario,
estoy de acuerdo con todo eso”, dijo Priebus durante una conversación con
reporteros.
Sin embargo
Priebus agrego que la tarea es más fácil decirla que hacerla.
“Estoy
a bordo con la idea de reacondicionamiento o librarnos del IRS y el condigo
tributario y que entre un nuevo sistema”, dijo.
El
Presidente del Partido Republicano estuvo de acuerdo en que
“desafortunadamente, nada de eso va a ocurrir teniendo en la Casa Blanca a una
persona que esta mas interesado en un estilo de gobierno europeo que la manera
en que nuestro país fue creado y ejecutado nuestra Constitución”.
La idea
de anular el IRS es muy difícil de hacer, sobre todo con líderes de la mayoría
en el Senado como Harry Reid que lo hacen más difícil.
El
Servicio de Rentas Internas ha estado en la mirilla de influyentes líderes del
Congreso por haberse realizado un mayor escrutinio a grupos conservadores por
sus creencias políticas.
El
asunto, que saltó a la luz en mayo del pasado año 2013, y ha dado abono a los
republicanos que siempre han criticado las presuntas maniobras políticas y
falta de transparencia de la Administración Obama.
Las
declaraciones de Priebus llegan en el momento en que el Comisionado del IRS
John Koskinen esta compareciendo ante el Comité de supervisión del Congreso que
investiga las denuncias sobre las investigaciones injustas de la agencia
federal contra grupos conservadores.
Koskinen,
ha sido acusado por el Presidente de ese importante comité Darrell Issa de
tener “un problema de credibilidad”.
“Este
tipo, refiriéndose al Comisionado del IRS John Koskinen, es una de las personas
más arrogantes, petulantes que he visto en cualquier tipo de audiencia formal
en Washington, D.C. “Es increíble, dijo Priebus.
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment