No 680 “En mi opinión”
Junio 7, 2014
“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño
Editor
_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_
Ya encontré a quien
encargarle que termine con todos los problemas de Los Estados Unidos. Es un
hombre blanco, rubio, con experiencia,
perfectamente instruido en las debilidades y los vicios de los hombres y
su infinita maldad. Tiene mucha experiencia en esto porque hace algún tiempo,
después que les enseño la verdad. Ellos se aferraron a la mentira, como ahora, y lo
traicionaron, encarcelaron y torturaron hasta asesinarlo clavándolo en un
madero. Pero resucito y no se rindió tiene fe y yo también, el regreso para completar la obra de
redención. Regresa para que los hombres sean buenos y trabajen para hacer este
mundo mejor. Tendremos ahora la oportunidad de demostrarle a ese hombre que
ahora sí que no le fallaremos que ahora si sacaremos a los mercaderes, los
fariseos y los falsos líderes de LOS
ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA y los enviaremos al infierno de donde nunca debieron
ni volverán a salir y allí pagaran por todos sus pecados. AMEN. “En mi opinión” Lázaro R González
Miño
_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_
AMENPER: Los extremos
del Péndulo Racial
Todas las carreras no son iguales.
De hecho, algunas son simplemente mejores que el resto.
En EE.UU. según las estadísticas
los mejores trabajos de 2014 ofrecen un mosaico de oportunidades de
seguridad que facilitan situaciones manejables que ofrecen
conciliación de la vida laboral y seguridad en el trabajo. Lo
que nos dicen las estadísticas es que los mejores trabajos son nuevas
posiciones relacionadas con las modernas metodologías de mercado, como
analistas, contadores y ejecutivos de mercadeo.
Pero lo que no dicen las estadísticas
es que en la nueva sociedad americana la mejor carrera es ser…NEGRO.
Este pudiera parecer un
comentario racista, pero me tienen que creer, no soy racista, todo lo
contrario.
Como testigo de la absurda
discriminación hacia los negros en el sur de los Estados Unidos en los años
cincuenta, no puedo tener en mi persona la actitud de discriminar a nadie por
su raza o color.
Pero este mismo concepto
adquirido en cuanto a la individualidad de la persona sin considerar el color o
raza, me hace rechazar la situación actual de péndulo, en que se considera
intocable a una persona de una raza determinada porque una crítica supone
racismo.
En los Estados Unidos de los años
cincuenta los blancos tenían un margen de oportunidades inmensamente superior
al de cualquier negro sin considerar la educación la decencia o la
inteligencia del negro.
Pero un blanco no era excusado
por ser blanco si cometía un acto fuera de la ley, o no podía avanzar en su
trabajo por el solo hecho de ser blanco.
Un blanco no podía recibir privilegios
especiales por simplemente ser blanco.
Al girar el péndulo social al
otro extremo, de lo que soy testigo hoy es una diferencia racial aberrante, en
esta nueva sociedad el negro se encuentra tan protegido por su raza que se ha
creado una burbuja aislante racial.
Un negro no puede cometer un
delito sin que la raza lo haga tener una ventaja judicial.
Aunque en todas las posiciones
profesionales y políticas el negro ha logrado obtener posiciones de acuerdo con
su capacidad, ingeniosidad y trabajo individual existe un sector de negros
cuyas oportunidades y privilegios existen sólo por el hecho de ser negros.
La excusa es la discriminación
que existió y que no existe hoy en día, pero que todavía se usa para obtener
privilegios sin responsabilidades o habilidades personales.
Los méritos individuales por
hechos del pasado, recibir privilegios por algo que sucedió a un antepasado, no
se ajusta a le realidad que debe imponer en una sociedad democrática.
Los méritos y los privilegios en
una república democrática se obtienen por el esfuerzo individual, no por tu
linaje o raza.,
Tenemos un presidente, un
organizador comunitario, sin más valor ni capacidad para el puesto que el hecho
de ser negro. La negrura también se mide por la importancia
que el individuo le da a la raza. Hay negros que hubieran podido
ocupar la presidencia, que son más capacitados que Obama, pero que no eran
racialmente militantes.
No ha existido un presidente en
los Estados Unidos durante su historia que haya cometido los desmanes que ha
cometido Barack Hussein Obama. Simplemente el hecho de haber liberado
cinco enemigos combatientes considerados los peores criminales de guerra entre
los prisioneros de Guantánamo, hubiera sido suficiente para impugnar a
cualquier presidente. Pero la burbuja racial protege a Obama.
En este entorno socio-racial no
es concebible que el primer presidente negro que ha tenido la nación sea
impugnado. ¿Por qué? Porque somos una nación tan racista
como lo eran los Estados del Sur en los años cincuenta. Por desgracia
para América, el péndulo se ha desbocado.
30 Years Later, Reagan's Normandy Speech
Still Resonates
President Ronald Reagan was the first sitting
president to attend a D-Day anniversary observance in Normandy, and his
emotional remembrance on the 40th anniversary on June 6, 1984, has been
described as one of his most memorable speeches.
Joining him, 30 years ago Friday, were surviving members of an Army Rangers team that had scaled cliffs at Pointe du Hoc to silence German guns protecting the Normandy beaches.
Story continues below video.
Here are Reagan's remarks to the veterans at Pointe du Hoc:
We're here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For 4 long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved, and the world prayed for its rescue. Here in Normandy the rescue began. Here the Allies stood and fought against tyranny in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history.
We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but 40 years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, 225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs. Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance.
The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers — the edge of the cliffs shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to climb over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe.
Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After 2 days of fighting, only 90 could still bear arms.
Behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war.
Gentlemen, I look at you, and I think of the words of Stephen Spender's poem. You are men who in your "lives fought for life . . . and left the vivid air signed with your honor."
I think I know what you may be thinking right now — thinking "we were just part of a bigger effort; everyone was brave that day." Well, everyone was. Do you remember the story of Bill Millin of the 51st Highlanders? Forty years ago today, British troops were pinned down near a bridge, waiting desperately for help. Suddenly, they heard the sound of bagpipes, and some thought they were dreaming. Well, they weren't. They looked up and saw Bill Millin with his bagpipes, leading the reinforcements and ignoring the smack of the bullets into the ground around him.
Lord Lovat was with him — Lord Lovat of Scotland, who calmly announced when he got to the bridge, "Sorry I'm a few minutes late," as if he'd been delayed by a traffic jam, when in truth he'd just come from the bloody fighting on Sword Beach, which he and his men had just taken.
There was the impossible valor of the Poles who threw themselves between the enemy and the rest of Europe as the invasion took hold, and the unsurpassed courage of the Canadians who had already seen the horrors of war on this coast. They knew what awaited them there, but they would not be deterred. And once they hit Juno Beach, they never looked back.
All of these men were part of a rollcall of honor with names that spoke of a pride as bright as the colors they bore: the Royal Winnipeg Rifles, Poland's 24th Lancers, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, the Screaming Eagles, the Yeomen of England's armored divisions, the forces of Free France, the Coast Guard's "Matchbox Fleet" and you, the American Rangers.
Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet, you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief; it was loyalty and love.
The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge — and pray God we have not lost it — that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt.
You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One's country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew people of your countries were behind you.
The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They fought— or felt in their hearts, though they couldn't know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m., in Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell.
Something else helped the men of D-day: their rockhard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And, so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer he told them: Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we're about to do. Also that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkenss for the promise God made to Joshua: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies.
When the war was over, there were lives to be rebuilt and governments to be returned to the people. There were nations to be reborn. Above all, there was a new peace to be assured. These were huge and daunting tasks. But the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They rebuilt a new Europe together.
There was first a great reconciliation among those who had been enemies, all of whom had suffered so greatly. The United States did its part, creating the Marshall plan to help rebuild our allies and our former enemies. The Marshall plan led to the Atlantic alliance -- a great alliance that serves to this day as our shield for freedom, for prosperity, and for peace.
In spite of our great efforts and successes, not all that followed the end of the war was happy or planned. Some liberated countries were lost. The great sadness of this loss echoes down to our own time in the streets of Warsaw, Prague, and East Berlin. Soviet troops that came to the center of this continent did not leave when peace came. They're still there, uninvited, unwanted, unyielding, almost 40 years after the war. Because of this, allied forces still stand on this continent. Today, as 40 years ago, our armies are here for only one purpose — to protect and defend democracy. The only territories we hold are memorials like this one and graveyards where our heroes rest.
We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect the peace, than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent.
But we try always to be prepared for peace; prepared to deter aggression; prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms; and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever.
It's fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II: 20 million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the Earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.
We will pray forever that some day that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.
We are bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We're bound by reality. The strength of America's allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe's democracies. We were with you then; we are with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.
Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their value [valor], and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.
Thank you very much, and God bless you all.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.comhttp://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Reagan-D-Day-Normandy-anniversary/2014/06/05/id/575497#ixzz33t7ncs3v
Joining him, 30 years ago Friday, were surviving members of an Army Rangers team that had scaled cliffs at Pointe du Hoc to silence German guns protecting the Normandy beaches.
Story continues below video.
Here are Reagan's remarks to the veterans at Pointe du Hoc:
We're here to mark that day in history when the Allied armies joined in battle to reclaim this continent to liberty. For 4 long years, much of Europe had been under a terrible shadow. Free nations had fallen, Jews cried out in the camps, millions cried out for liberation. Europe was enslaved, and the world prayed for its rescue. Here in Normandy the rescue began. Here the Allies stood and fought against tyranny in a giant undertaking unparalleled in human history.
We stand on a lonely, windswept point on the northern shore of France. The air is soft, but 40 years ago at this moment, the air was dense with smoke and the cries of men, and the air was filled with the crack of rifle fire and the roar of cannon. At dawn, on the morning of the 6th of June, 1944, 225 Rangers jumped off the British landing craft and ran to the bottom of these cliffs. Their mission was one of the most difficult and daring of the invasion: to climb these sheer and desolate cliffs and take out the enemy guns. The Allies had been told that some of the mightiest of these guns were here and they would be trained on the beaches to stop the Allied advance.
The Rangers looked up and saw the enemy soldiers — the edge of the cliffs shooting down at them with machine guns and throwing grenades. And the American Rangers began to climb. They shot rope ladders over the face of these cliffs and began to climb over the face of these cliffs and began to pull themselves up. When one Ranger fell, another would take his place. When one rope was cut, a Ranger would grab another and begin his climb again. They climbed, shot back, and held their footing. Soon, one by one, the Rangers pulled themselves over the top, and in seizing the firm land at the top of these cliffs, they began to seize back the continent of Europe.
Two hundred and twenty-five came here. After 2 days of fighting, only 90 could still bear arms.
Behind me is a memorial that symbolizes the Ranger daggers that were thrust into the top of these cliffs. And before me are the men who put them there.
These are the boys of Pointe du Hoc. These are the men who took the cliffs. These are the champions who helped free a continent. These are the heroes who helped end a war.
Gentlemen, I look at you, and I think of the words of Stephen Spender's poem. You are men who in your "lives fought for life . . . and left the vivid air signed with your honor."
I think I know what you may be thinking right now — thinking "we were just part of a bigger effort; everyone was brave that day." Well, everyone was. Do you remember the story of Bill Millin of the 51st Highlanders? Forty years ago today, British troops were pinned down near a bridge, waiting desperately for help. Suddenly, they heard the sound of bagpipes, and some thought they were dreaming. Well, they weren't. They looked up and saw Bill Millin with his bagpipes, leading the reinforcements and ignoring the smack of the bullets into the ground around him.
Lord Lovat was with him — Lord Lovat of Scotland, who calmly announced when he got to the bridge, "Sorry I'm a few minutes late," as if he'd been delayed by a traffic jam, when in truth he'd just come from the bloody fighting on Sword Beach, which he and his men had just taken.
There was the impossible valor of the Poles who threw themselves between the enemy and the rest of Europe as the invasion took hold, and the unsurpassed courage of the Canadians who had already seen the horrors of war on this coast. They knew what awaited them there, but they would not be deterred. And once they hit Juno Beach, they never looked back.
All of these men were part of a rollcall of honor with names that spoke of a pride as bright as the colors they bore: the Royal Winnipeg Rifles, Poland's 24th Lancers, the Royal Scots Fusiliers, the Screaming Eagles, the Yeomen of England's armored divisions, the forces of Free France, the Coast Guard's "Matchbox Fleet" and you, the American Rangers.
Forty summers have passed since the battle that you fought here. You were young the day you took these cliffs; some of you were hardly more than boys, with the deepest joys of life before you. Yet, you risked everything here. Why? Why did you do it? What impelled you to put aside the instinct for self-preservation and risk your lives to take these cliffs? What inspired all the men of the armies that met here? We look at you, and somehow we know the answer. It was faith and belief; it was loyalty and love.
The men of Normandy had faith that what they were doing was right, faith that they fought for all humanity, faith that a just God would grant them mercy on this beachhead or on the next. It was the deep knowledge — and pray God we have not lost it — that there is a profound, moral difference between the use of force for liberation and the use of force for conquest. You were here to liberate, not to conquer, and so you and those others did not doubt your cause. And you were right not to doubt.
You all knew that some things are worth dying for. One's country is worth dying for, and democracy is worth dying for, because it's the most deeply honorable form of government ever devised by man. All of you loved liberty. All of you were willing to fight tyranny, and you knew people of your countries were behind you.
The Americans who fought here that morning knew word of the invasion was spreading through the darkness back home. They fought— or felt in their hearts, though they couldn't know in fact, that in Georgia they were filling the churches at 4 a.m., in Kansas they were kneeling on their porches and praying, and in Philadelphia they were ringing the Liberty Bell.
Something else helped the men of D-day: their rockhard belief that Providence would have a great hand in the events that would unfold here; that God was an ally in this great cause. And, so, the night before the invasion, when Colonel Wolverton asked his parachute troops to kneel with him in prayer he told them: Do not bow your heads, but look up so you can see God and ask His blessing in what we're about to do. Also that night, General Matthew Ridgway on his cot, listening in the darkenss for the promise God made to Joshua: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
These are the things that impelled them; these are the things that shaped the unity of the Allies.
When the war was over, there were lives to be rebuilt and governments to be returned to the people. There were nations to be reborn. Above all, there was a new peace to be assured. These were huge and daunting tasks. But the Allies summoned strength from the faith, belief, loyalty, and love of those who fell here. They rebuilt a new Europe together.
There was first a great reconciliation among those who had been enemies, all of whom had suffered so greatly. The United States did its part, creating the Marshall plan to help rebuild our allies and our former enemies. The Marshall plan led to the Atlantic alliance -- a great alliance that serves to this day as our shield for freedom, for prosperity, and for peace.
In spite of our great efforts and successes, not all that followed the end of the war was happy or planned. Some liberated countries were lost. The great sadness of this loss echoes down to our own time in the streets of Warsaw, Prague, and East Berlin. Soviet troops that came to the center of this continent did not leave when peace came. They're still there, uninvited, unwanted, unyielding, almost 40 years after the war. Because of this, allied forces still stand on this continent. Today, as 40 years ago, our armies are here for only one purpose — to protect and defend democracy. The only territories we hold are memorials like this one and graveyards where our heroes rest.
We in America have learned bitter lessons from two World Wars: It is better to be here ready to protect the peace, than to take blind shelter across the sea, rushing to respond only after freedom is lost. We've learned that isolationism never was and never will be an acceptable response to tyrannical governments with an expansionist intent.
But we try always to be prepared for peace; prepared to deter aggression; prepared to negotiate the reduction of arms; and, yes, prepared to reach out again in the spirit of reconciliation. In truth, there is no reconciliation we would welcome more than a reconciliation with the Soviet Union, so, together, we can lessen the risks of war, now and forever.
It's fitting to remember here the great losses also suffered by the Russian people during World War II: 20 million perished, a terrible price that testifies to all the world the necessity of ending war. I tell you from my heart that we in the United States do not want war. We want to wipe from the face of the Earth the terrible weapons that man now has in his hands. And I tell you, we are ready to seize that beachhead. We look for some sign from the Soviet Union that they are willing to move forward, that they share our desire and love for peace, and that they will give up the ways of conquest. There must be a changing there that will allow us to turn our hope into action.
We will pray forever that some day that changing will come. But for now, particularly today, it is good and fitting to renew our commitment to each other, to our freedom, and to the alliance that protects it.
We are bound today by what bound us 40 years ago, the same loyalties, traditions, and beliefs. We're bound by reality. The strength of America's allies is vital to the United States, and the American security guarantee is essential to the continued freedom of Europe's democracies. We were with you then; we are with you now. Your hopes are our hopes, and your destiny is our destiny.
Here, in this place where the West held together, let us make a vow to our dead. Let us show them by our actions that we understand what they died for. Let our actions say to them the words for which Matthew Ridgway listened: "I will not fail thee nor forsake thee."
Strengthened by their courage, heartened by their value [valor], and borne by their memory, let us continue to stand for the ideals for which they lived and died.
Thank you very much, and God bless you all.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.comhttp://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Reagan-D-Day-Normandy-anniversary/2014/06/05/id/575497#ixzz33t7ncs3v
AMENPER: Obama no debe
de ser Impugnado por las cámaras legislativas.
Siempre
había pensado que las actitudes de Obama durante su presidencia, son causa de
impugnación. He cambiado de opinión. Obama no debe de ser
impugnado por las cámaras legislativas, obama debe de ser juzgado en
Corte Marcial por un tribunal militar, como comandante en jefe insubordinado
que ha cometido actos criminales.
Corte
marcial es la denominación usada para designar a los tribunales
militares que determinan las sanciones penales aplicables a los
miembros de las fuerzas fuerzas armadas conforme al derecho
militar
Leyes
militares son el conjunto de disposiciones legales que regulan la organización,
funciones y mantenimiento de las instituciones armadas, para el cumplimiento de
sus fines, en orden a la defensa y servicio de la patria, incumplimiento de
estas leyes son causa de Corte Marcial
Barack
Obama se convirtió en un símbolo para los anti guerrerista, en gran parte por que
se presentó como un político contra la guerra. Sería la altura de la ironía si
este presidente "contra la guerra" pudiera terminar siendo
acusado de crímenes de guerra, acusado de su conducta en la guerra, o una corte
marcial por abandono del deber. El desenlace de su narrativa de Bengasi, que
costó la vida a soldados estadounidenses, y la liberación de cinco talibanes
con grado equivalente a mariscales de guerra, culpables de crímenes contra las
fuerzas armadas y el pueblo de Estados Unidos, cuya libertad pone en
peligro la vida de miembros de las fuerzas armadas todos son
crímenes de guerra que presentan precisamente las posibilidades frente a él de
ser acusado como criminal de guerra.
Las
responsabilidades de la oficina de la presidencia tienen que tener
consecuencias cuando en su cumplimiento afecta a una nación y a sus fuerzas
armadas. Es como cuando entramos a esas tiendas de artículos de
cristal que tienen un rótulo que dice "si rompe algo, tiene que
pagarlo" sin lugar a dudas cuando un comandante en jefe rompe con su
conducta la vida de los miembros de las fuerzas armadas que defienden a esta
nación tiene que pagar por su conducta.
El presidente
posee todos los poderes que se otorgan por el derecho internacional a cualquier
comandante supremo. En ausencia de intentos por parte del Congreso para limitar
su poder, podrá establecer y prescribir la competencia y procedimiento de las
comisiones militares, el Presidente es el tribunal de última instancia para la
aplicación de las normas y reglamentos que adopte el Congreso para el gobierno
de las fuerzas, y que se hacen cumplir a través de los consejos de
guerra.
En el caso de
Obama simplemente se limpia su trasero con el congreso, actúa no sólo como un
comandante en jefe, pero como un emperador.
Artículo II,
sección 4 de la Constitución establece que "El Presidente,
[Vicepresidente], y todos los funcionarios civiles de los Estados Unidos serán
separados de sus puestos al ser acusados y declarados culpables de traición, cohecho u
otros delitos y faltas graves, por un juicio de impugnación de las cámaras
legislativas, pero en el caso de Obama que actúa como un jefe militar
autoritario, sin consultar al congreso, se trata de un caso definido
como insubordinación militar y debe de ser juzgado bajo una Corte Marcial.
We
all enjoy talking about guns, but the fact of the matter is that if dealers,
distributors, and manufacturers don’t get paid, we don’t have a gun industry.
It
appears that this was precisely the plot of a number of anti-gun financial
companies (that just happen to donate millions to anti-gun Democrats) that
started several years ago during the first term of “hope and change.” The April
2012 showdown between anti-gun Bank of America (BOA) and Kelly McMillan of McMillan USA that resulted
from this behind-the-scenes battle quickly became legendary. He spent
5 minutes talking about how McMillan has changed in the last 5 years and has
become more of a firearms manufacturer than a supplier of accessories.
At
this point I interrupted him and asked, “Can I possible save you some time so
that you don’t waste your breath? What you are going to tell me is that because
we are in the firearms manufacturing business you no longer want my business.”
“That
is correct,” he said.
I
replied, “That is okay, we will move our accounts as soon as possible. We can
find a 2nd Amendment-friendly bank that will be glad to have our business. You
won’t mind if I tell the NRA, SCI, and everyone one I know that BofA is not
firearms industry friendly?”
“You
have to do what you must,” he said.
“So
you are telling me this is a politically motivated decision, is that right?”
Mr Fox confirmed that it was. At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing let for him to say.
Mr Fox confirmed that it was. At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing let for him to say.
There
was, however, plenty for the shooting community to say, especially Kelly
McMillan.
When Bearing Arms spoke with Kelly McMillan last week he
said that he still fields emails and phone calls every
day about the BOA snub, more than a year and a half later, from other gun
industry companies that have been similarly targeted.
The
sad fact of the matter is that BOA and other financial services merchants such
as Intuit and PayPal have treated other firearms industry companies and
customers just as poorly. The difference between Kelly McMillan and most others
that these anti-gun companies have discriminated against is that Kelly McMillan
had the means and the determination to do something about it.
That
“something” is the just-launched McMillan Merchant Solutions (MMS)
a company established with Merchant Services Limited, which now offers credit
card processing services to gun companies from a company that will never turn
them down for political reasons.
“Yeah,
but what does that mean to me?”
Whether
you buy online or in the store, roughly 90-percent of sales are conducted with
credit or debit cards. By refusing to do business with gun companies, anti-gun
banks and processing services were attempting to gut the firearms industry from
underneath, making it difficult, if not impossible, for gun dealers to process
sales. MMS is coming in to partner with dealers as their credit card processor
to key both gun stores and their customers happy.
A
third-generation firearms industry figurehead, Kelly McMillan is adamant that
McMillian Merchant Solutions is designed first and foremost to give back to and
support the gun industry by giving it a sound financial footing, and he’s
showing that in unique way. A small percentage of every dollar of revenue
that MMS goes to gun rights and conservation groups in order to keep up the fight to defend our
Second Amendment rights, and the dealers that use MMS get to pick which one of
these organizations that their processing fees supports.
MMS
is great for full-time gun shops, but smaller FFLs and accessory makers might
not need their kind of service, and they aren’t set up to handle the customer
side of transactions the way Paypal is. Paypal is actively shutting down
payments for firearms-related transactions, but there is an alternative that is
starting to gain traction.
PistolPay is a PayPal
replacement made for shooters, by shooters. Ira Goodstadt is a retired
firefighter, avid 1911 junkie, home AR-15 builder, and online forum dweller who
was attempting to use PayPal to process a forum group-buy from AIM Surplus, when Paypal
locked down his account, then his wife’s account, and then finally his
daughter’s, because they didn’t approve of what he was attempting to buy.
Tired
of being treated as a second-class citizen just for exercising his
constitutional rights, Ira and Chapman Ducote, a trigger-pulling friend with
financial services background, went to work, and soon afterward PistolPay was
born.
The
first few months of PistolPay’s existence was slow, due in part to the meltdown
of GPal/GunPal, which is either
described as being Ponzi scheme or simply incompetent, depending on who you
talk to. The GPal/GunPal meltdown made many in the firearms community leery of
dealing with a new brand, fearing a scam.
Unlike
GPal however, PistolPay operates though a major bank as the depository and
Merchant Services Limited handles the card processing (as they do for McMillan
Merchant Solutions). After partnering to handle the financial ends of raffles
for a number of pro-gun groups ( including the 1911 Addicts forumand One Million Moms Against Gun Control), PistolPay started to gain momentum mostly by word
of mouth, and is starting to build relationships within companies within the
industry.
You
might soon start to see PistolPay appear as a payment option on prominent
industry web sites as a payment option.
Financial
companies aligned with anti-gun Democrats are trying to hamper or shutdown the
firearms industry. Thanks to companies like McMillan Merchant Solutions and
PistolPay, their desire to infringe on our Constitutional rights just go that
much harder.
RICARDO SAMITIER: NSA Mantuvo Secreto Un Virus Informático, Para Poder Usarlo... y espiar a los ciudadanos…
Los virus
informaticos son usados por criminales ciberneticos para robar
los datos
de personas inocentes…
Ahora
sabemos que el NSA de Obama supo de un virus criminal y lo mantuvo secreto...
para
poder usarlo!!!
Osea,
dejaron a los criminales seguir usando este virus por anyos,
para
tambien usar el mismo virus y poder espionar americanos.
El NSA no
es una agencia federal fuera de control.
Es otra
agencia federal que está haciendo exactamente, lo que le pide el gobierno de
Obama!
Por eso
el IRS investiga al Tea Party.
Por eso
el BLM le roba las vacas a Bundy.
Por eso
el VA deja morir a los veteranos.
Por eso
dejaron morir a los americanos en Benghazi.
Nada de
eso, fue accidental.
Todo fue
la politica oficial de Obama
y solo
despues de ser descubierto,
es
explicado como unos agentes fuera de control.
No!
Basta Ya De MENTIRAS, Una ´Tras Una!
NSA Said to Exploit Heartbleed
Bug
for Intelligence for Years
7 “Lideres
Europeos” + Obama Contra Putín...
Que Grupo
Tan Distinguido Se Reune Para Darle A Putín Otra Amenaza.
¿Cual Es La Amenaza Contra Putín?
No dicen,
pero si dijieron que ya informaron a Putín.
Que si no retira su ayuda a los Separatistas en Ucránia
van van aplicar mas sanciones sobre Rúsia.
Cual es la queja de los Globalistas contra Putín?
Simple! Putín Es Un Nacionalista
RUSO y no un Globalista…
Ese es su crimen. Los Globalistas quieren borrar las
naciones, para poder gobernar COMO
EN LOS
TIEMPOS FEUDALES…. Cualquiera que no se doblega, es destruido.
Obama dijo que las sanciones van a pegar mas fuertes a Rúsia que a Europa!
Los líderes europeos, todos sonrientes, aparentemente no saben que con esas mismas sanciones
tambien sufre el Pueblo europeo!
Cualquier sacrificio para el Gobierno Mundial es buena.Entre copas
de champagne y platos de pato l'orange,
nadie recordó el Pueblo… El que paga la cuenta
siempre!
Los
Intereses A Los Banqueros Por
Debajo de “CERO” PORCIENTO…
El
estafador más grande del mundo, Mario Draghi director del monopolio
financiero, conocido como el Banco Central Europeo
acaba
de hacer história!
Regala
el dinero a su amigotes!!
Por
que?
Draghi,
siendo un economista, bien sabe que el Capitalismo, necesita Capital.
El
Capital, es producto de los Ahorros!
Para
atraer Ahorros, hay que pagar un interés mas alto que la inflación!!
Pero
que hace Draghi? Exactamente lo contrario!!!
Garantiza
la destrucción de los Ahorros, pagando intereses negativos.
De
contra, facilita dinero-crediticio (osea falsificado) a los bancos primarios.
Estos
bancos, todos ellos quebrados, no los prestan a los Pequenyos y Medianas
Empresas.
Al
contrario, juegan en el gran Casino conocido como las bolsas de valores.
Siguiendo
los pasos, de todos los Imperios del pasado que han destruido sus paises con
dinero falso!!!
Sr.
Draghi papel impreso no son Ahorros.
Quebrastes
a Grecia, cuando trabajabas para Goldman-Sachs
y
ahora quieres quebrar a toda Europa.
Eso,
ya es claro!
Lo Que
Deseo Saber, Sr. Draghi, Es Que Si Te Pagan Por Hacerlo O Eres Un Idiota???
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Nos
Burlamos Cuando Chávez Pidió La Devolución Del Oro… Ahora Lo Han Pedido… Los
Grandes países…
La
Manipulación Es Ya Tan Descarada Y Tan Obvia…
Que Todos
Los Países Están Reclamando La
Devolución
De Su Oro!... Esta Vez,
Fue Austria.
¿Por qué?
Porque
saben, que el dólar no vale nada!
Cuando
colapse el dólar, el que tenga oro, plata y petroleo
va a
sobrevivir bien durante EL REAJUSTE DE CUENTAS.
Los que
tengan sus ahorros en dolares,
van a
sentirse que se han mudado a Mexico,
el Peso
y el Dólar van a valer lo mismo!!!
Ya lo
verán...
LECCIONES HISTORICAS
Ucrania tiene un grave problema.
Los Separatistas reciben ayuda y armas de Rúsia.
El control de la frontera era necesario para los Separatistas
pero los rusos, no podian intervenir.
Los Separatistas han destruido todos los controles fronterizos.
Ya no existe fronteras en los cruces mas importantes.
El flujo de ayuda puede pasar libremente.
Putín a logrado esto, sin perder un solo soldado!
Ahora, comparemos esto, con las costas de Cuba,
y con el Exilio Cubano.
Las costas son una frontera natural.
Pero es imposible costodiar toda una frontera marítima
y aún más dificil, defender todas las costas!
La prueba de esto, es que decenas de miles de balseros
han cruzado en balsas, sin ser detectados, ni por los
Americanos!!
Pero en los 55 anyos de los Castros, nada efectivo se a podido hacer.
Por qué? Ustedes que piensan?
Son los Separatistas mas valientes que los cubanos?
Tienen mas voluntad??
o será que ellos tienen a un Putín de su lado y nosotros, solo
traidores???
Mejor prueba no existe.
Ningún presidente Americano a querido liberar a Cuba!!!
Si hubieran querido, el estrecho de la Florida,
se hubiera convertido en la Normandia Cubana.
Vean lo que han hecho los Separatistas en Ucránia:
Increíble,
Pero Cierto!:
Corruptos
en Washington, compraron a los corruptos
“Generales
Sin Victorias” en el Pentágono…
(Si…
No Se Deje Engañar… El País más Poderoso
NO HA
GANADO Ninguna Guerra DESDE 1945…
Siempre
Se “Retira”… Dejando las Cosas Peor…
Ahora
Nuestros “GENERALES” Son
Burócratas…
De
Contra… Administran Un Presupuesto Millonario…
El Ultimo
Negocito… De Los Generales Burócratas
Del
Pentágono… Fue Darle Un Contrato A Una
Compañía
Canadiense… para Proteger Las Computadoras
Del
Pentágono…
Aquí
tienen la Noticia…
Indeed, the Department of Health and Human Services
kicked CGI Federal to the curb in February for making a hash of HealthCare.gov.
But the Department of Defense seems unconcerned.
CGI Federal is a division of publicly traded CGI
Group (GIB). While Obamacare has delivered GIB a mild hit in recent months,
the firm’s overall performance since the start of the stock market rally in
2009 has crushed the S&P 500…
Teen's Simple Question Makes Nancy Pelosi Look
Ridiculous
How sad is it that it takes a
teenager to ask Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) a real question? Sure, if you watch the
video it seems that a child has completely flummoxed the ancient
Representative from Californai, but don’t judge her too harshly. The media is
constantly treating the Democrat Party with kid gloves – so when somebody
asks a Democrat a real question they get very flustered.
In an effort to not make any
Democrat angry, folks in the media hardly ever ask questions as
straightforward as teenager Andrew Demeter does here. Perhaps they should
start, or we may begin turning to High School children for the news…
Watch Nancy get her hat handed to
her by a child… it’s a lot of fun.
Read more at http://visiontoamerica.com/17787/teens-simple-question-makes-nancy-pelosi-look-ridiculous/#9W41gbkJXLvMo1cG.99
Teen Unemployment In
Major U.S. Cities Tops 50%
Old timers often say that the young people in the U.S. today don’t have the
work ethic of their predecessors. This may be true, but is this perceived
weakness a symptom of a greater problem? Has the opportunity for many young
people to find employment diminished, and thus made it harder for them to
learn the necessary work ethic on the job?
Before we
try to answer that question, let’s examine some evidence from a new analysis
by the Employment Policy Institute (EPI) that shows unemployment among teens
without a high school diploma is greater than 50% in two very large cities.
CNS News reports:
Using U.S.
Census Bureau data from May 2013 to April 2014, the analysis reveals that in
Riverside-San Bernardino area of Southern California, the unemployment rate
for teenagers 16 to 19 years old who don’t have a high school diploma is 54.2
percent.
In the
Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, Ore., metropolitan area, the unemployment rate
from that population is 53.8 percent.
“These numbers are staggering,” Michael Saltsman,
director of research at EPI told CNSNews.com. “Teens across the country this
summer are missing out on valuable work experience as they continue to suffer
through an extended period of high unemployment and difficult job prospects.”
The
national average for this age group and skill level is 21.6%, but the high
unemployment rate for the least skilled young people is not contained to the
west coast. Rounding out the top ten on the list are Los Angeles-Long
Beach-Santa An, CA (39%), San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA (37.5%), San
Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA (35.2%), Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington,
PA-NJ-DE (33.2%), Chicago-Naperville-Joliet, IN-IN-WI (33%), Pittsburgh, PA
(32.9%), Sacramento-Arden-Arcade Roseville, CA (32.1%), and Baltimore-Towson,
MD (31.4%)
The issue
of teen unemployment is a complex one that has grown worse over the years.
Often, people point to minimum wage laws as a driving force behind these
disappointing employment numbers. Minimum wage is certainly partially to
blame for the issue. Minimum wage laws reduce opportunities for employment by
making low paying jobs for unskilled teenagers illegal. Companies are forced
to lump those job functions in with a higher wage earner’s job duties,
replace the duties with automation, or stop providing the services.
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2014/06/07/teen-unemployment-major-u-s-cities-tops-50/#sPIImiyoeyicWF51.99
Surprise!
The Government Now Can’t Even Guess How Much Obamacare Ultimately Will
Ultimately Cost
COMMENTARY BY Genevieve Wood@genevievewood
Genevieve Wood advances policy priorities of The Heritage Foundation
as senior contributor to The Daily Signal.
It’s no secret
Obamacare is unaffordable. But now we also know that even the Congressional
Budget Office can’t predict how much more this disastrous law will cost.
According to a
footnote from a Congressional Budget Office report released in April but
reported this week by Roll
Call, the law’s true costs and long-term fiscal impact are simply
impossible to track.
That’s a change in
tune for the CBO, which originally reported in 2010 that Obamacare would pay
for itself and over the course of a decade would decrease the deficit.
So what’s changed?
Well, thanks to the
constant modifications to the law, the only thing predictable about
Obamacare’s provisions is that they’re unpredictable.
Many of the “savings”
and “revenue” (read: mandates and tax increases) originally proposed to pay
for this redesign of one-sixth of the U.S. economy, whether Medicare cuts or
employer mandates, have been waived, stalled or simply not implemented,
making a defensible revised forecast impossible. The changes occurred because
it became clear such measures were both politically unpopular and
realistically unaffordable.
There are other
reasons that it’s virtually impossible to even guess how much Obamacare will
ultimately cost.
We learned this week
that more than 2 million people—a whopping quarter of those enrolled in
Obamacare—who signed up for insurance via Obamacare’s health care
exchanges have discrepancies in their records and paperwork.
Apparently the
government has inaccurate or inadequate information regarding the income
levels of more than 1 million people who signed up and can’t verify the
immigration or citizenship status for more than 900,000. That means some
current enrollees may not be eligible for Obamacare subsidies and may lose their
coverage or may have been given too generous a subsidy and eventually will
have to pay the government back.
Serco, Inc., a
government contractor hired to track down and verify the missing information,
released a statement saying, “Current system access and functionality … limits the ability
to resolve outstanding inconsistencies.”
That means the
government’s website again was not up to par and much of the work to resolve
the data discrepancies will require hands-on work to figure out who among
these 2 million people should be getting insurance and subsidies through the
exchange and who should not. In other words, there will need to be a
significant number of extra staffers brought onto fix this mess.
Guess the Obama
administration finally is delivering on those “job creation” promises—too bad
it’s at the taxpayers’ expense.
Not all the bad news
regarding the spending train wreck that is Obamacare emanates from Washington.
Many of the statesthat chose to set up
their own exchanges spent hundreds of millions of federal dollars to do
so—and yet ended up with exchanges that don’t work.
As we approach the
next enrollment period in November, lawmakers in those states are frantically
trying to figure out whether they can get more dollars from Washington to fix
their problems or if they are going to have to use their own state funds.
State Rep. John Delaney, a Democrat in Maryland, worries his state will have
to divert dollars from education, fixing potholes and other programs to
address its broken exchange. “You can’t just print money in the states,” he said.
That’s right. But the
printing presses in Washington have been overused for some time as well—and
states that gladly jumped on the Obamacare bandwagon and took the bait
shouldn’t be let off the hook by Congress.
So to sum up, the CBO
can’t calculate Obamacare’s future costs, confusion about enrollees’ actual
salaries could lead to wildly varying numbers on how much it costs this year,
and there’s no telling how much money some states ultimately will weasel out
of Washington to set up Obamacare.
Talk about a
monstrosity of a government program.
What we do know for
sure is that Obamacare will cost far more than President Obama and all those
who voted for it in Congress told us it would. Which most of us realized all along.
|
_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*_*__*_*_
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." ~Abraham Lincoln
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." ~Abraham Lincoln
“FREEDOM
IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment