Friday, January 18, 2013

How is that you need a background check to buy a gun and not to be a president?‏ "En mi opinion" Dic 18, 2013



.“EN MI OPINION” ‘IN GOOD WE TRUST’.
.     Viernes, 18  2013      No 299      Editor Lázaro R González Miño    .

"A government big enough to give everything you want is also big enough to take everything you have."
-Ronald Reagan

 President Obama – A Gun Owner’s Best Friend.  By Skip Coryell /
http://clashdaily.com/2013/01/president-obama-a-gun-owners-best-friend/
The other day I got a call from an old friend from college. I’d heard from him only a few times in the past thirty years, so I was a bit surprised. I was taken aback by his short and to the point email. It simply said: “Hi Skip, what is the best gun for self-defense?”
I had to think about that, because I had no idea why he was asking. I told him there was no single “best gun” for self defense, and then I took him and his ten-year-old son to the gun range. I didn’t ask him point blank why this sudden interest in guns at age fifty-something. He was a city dweller, successful business executive, husband and father of two.
When we got to the range it was fifty-five degrees and sunny. Not bad for a January in Michigan. It’s almost like God wanted us to be there. At least that’s the way I took it. I took him through all the basics of safety and shooting, and then we threw some lead downrange. He was pretty good for a banker. And then his son wanted to try. I started him out with a Ruger Mark III 22/45. By time we were done both father and son were hooked.
From the range I took them to the local gun shop, and he bought his son an airsoft pistol. The next day he went out on his own and bought two pistols for himself. He shared with me what caused his transition, how he’d gone from a totally gun-free home to a man ready to buy two guns and sign up for a concealed carry class.
He told me that a few days prior, in his own neighborhood, there had been a home invasion. An elderly couple in their eighties had been shot to death. It was a low-crime, upscale community. His son heard about it and came to him and asked, “Dad, what happens if they break into our house?”
My friend didn’t have an answer for his son. And that’s when he called me. Damn it feels good to reel in a convert!
The anti-gunners are in a tizzy right now, because the NRA just got 250,000 new members on the heels of a school shooting; and because guns are flying off shelves; and because the ammo store cupboards are bare. They’re scratching their heads saying, “What the hell just happened?”
Well, it’s Barack Obama, stupid! Every time the man opens his mouth people buy more guns. And now that he’s proposing gun bans and registration, the anti-gunners don’t stand a prayer. The big question here is why? Why, on the heels of a terrible tragedy like the Sandy Hook elementary shooting where twenty little kids were murdered, are people running out and arming themselves with guns as fast as they can?
It’s simple. Because most people care about their families. Obama’s an anti-gunner, but his kids are protected by dozens of guns and guards. Even the liberals know the only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun. So even while they rail against guns they make sure there are plenty around them and their families. It’s common sense.
So let them keep proposing gun control all they want. They are unifying the 2A troops; our ranks are swelling; many who were on the fence are rapidly jumping over to our side.
You might ask me, “Skip, you seem optimistic in the midst of a full-on frontal assault on the Second Amendment. Is there any chance of us losing more of our freedom?” My answer: “Damn straight there is.”
But quite frankly I prefer an open fight. Let’s duke it out now rather than drag it on for generations to come. This is one old warrior who loves the smell of gun smoke whether it’s literal or figurative.
Here’s what I say: “Bring it on, Bammy! Molon Labe! Come and take them!” But whatever you do, don’t stop shooting your mouth off, because the more you talk the more people see you for the fool you are and buy more guns.
But the most important thing is this: Now my friend has an answer for his 10-year-old son. And it goes something like this: “Don’t worry, son. If someone tries to hurt you, I’ll double-tap center of exposed mass until he stops.”
And that makes sense whether you’re a banker, a redneck or even the anti-gun President of the United States.

Sheriffs, State Lawmakers Push Back on Gun Control
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/Gun-Control-Pushback/2013/01/17/id/471825?s=al&promo_code=11FA9-1#ixzz2IFOrDhyZ

From Oregon to Mississippi, President Barack Obama's proposed ban on new assault weapons and large-capacity magazines struck a nerve among rural lawmen and lawmakers, many of whom vowed to ignore any restrictions — and even try to stop federal officials from enforcing gun policy in their jurisdictions.
"A lot of sheriffs are now standing up and saying, 'Follow the Constitution,'" said Josephine County Sheriff Gil Gilbertson, whose territory covers the timbered mountains of southwestern Oregon.
But their actual powers to defy federal law are limited. And much of the impassioned rhetoric amounts to political posturing until — and if — Congress acts.

Note:
Should Obama's Gun Ban Be Approved? Vote Here Now in Urgent Poll

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat, said Wednesday it's unlikely an assault weapons ban would actually pass the House of Representatives. Absent action by Congress, all that remains are 23 executive orders Obama announced that apply only to the federal government, not local or state law enforcement.
Gun advocates have seen Obama as an enemy despite his expression of support for the interpretation of the Second Amendment as a personal right to have guns. So his call for new measures — including background checks for all gun buyers and Senate confirmation of a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — triggered new vows of defiance.
In Mississippi, Gov. Phil Bryant, a Republican, urged the Legislature to make it illegal to enforce any executive order by the president that violates the Constitution.
"If someone kicks open my door and they're entering my home, I'd like as many bullets as I could to protect my children, and if I only have three, then the ability for me to protect my family is greatly diminished," Bryant said. "And what we're doing now is saying, 'We're standing against the federal government taking away our civil liberties.'"
Tennessee Republican state Rep. Joe Carr wants to make it a state crime for federal agents to enforce any ban on firearms or ammunition. Carr instead called for more armed guards at schools.
"We're tired of political antics, cheap props of using children as bait to gin up emotional attachment for an issue that quite honestly doesn't solve the problem," Carr said.
Legislative proposals to pre-empt new federal gun restrictions also have arisen in Wyoming, Utah and Alaska.
A Wyoming bill specifies that any federal limitation on guns would be unenforceable. It also would make it a state felony for federal agents to try to enforce restrictions.
"I think there are a lot of people who would want to take all of our guns if they could," said co-sponsor Rep. Kendell Kroeker, a Republican. "And they're only restrained by the opposition of the people, and other lawmakers who are concerned about our rights."

Note:
Should Obama's Gun Ban Be Approved? Vote Here Now in Urgent Poll

Republican state Sen. Larry Hicks credited Wyoming's high rate of gun ownership for a low rate of gun violence.
"Our kids grow up around firearms, and they also grow up hunting, and they know what the consequences are of taking a life," Hicks said. "We're not insulated from the real world in Wyoming."
In Utah, some Republicans are preparing legislation to exempt the state from federal gun laws — and fine any federal agents who try to seize guns. A bill in the Alaska House would make it a misdemeanor for a federal agent to enforce new restrictions on gun ownership.
While such proposals are eye-catching, they likely could never be implemented.
"The legislature can pass anything it wants," said Sam Kamin, a constitutional law professor at the University of Denver. "The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution makes that clearly unconstitutional. Where there's a conflict between state and federal law, the federal government is supreme."
Kamin and other legal experts said such disdain of Obama's proposals is reminiscent of former Confederate states' refusal to comply with federal law extending equal rights for blacks after the Civil War.
The National Sheriff's Association has supported administration efforts to combat gun violence after the Sandy Hook Elementary shootings. President Larry Amerson, sheriff of Calhoun, Ala., said he understands the frustrations of people in rural areas with the federal government. But he feels his oath of office binds him to uphold all laws.
"Any sheriff who knows his duty knows we don't enforce federal law, per se," said Amerson, a longtime firearms instructor and hunter.
Some rural sheriffs view the federal government as an adversary, with gun ownership at the core of that belief.
In Minnesota, Pine County Sheriff Robin Cole sent an open letter to residents saying he did not believe the federal government had the right to tell the states how to regulate firearms. He said he would refuse to enforce any federal mandate he felt violated constitutional rights.
The Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, based in Fredericksburg, Texas, encourages that point of view. Founder Richard Mack, a former sheriff of Apache County, Ariz., speaks regularly at gatherings of Tea Party groups and gun rights organizations.

"I will tell Mr. Obama and everybody else who wants to impose gun control in America, that whether you like it or not, it is against the law," said Mack. "Now we have good sheriffs who are standing up and defending the law against our own president."
© Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/Gun-Control-Pushback/2013/01/17/id/471825?s=al&promo_code=11FA9-1#ixzz2IFPDKuip
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed?
Vote Here Now!

The Militia Question, Resolved: Second Amendment 101

by Michael E. Kreca





"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. Indeed I would go so far as to say that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order."

~ Adolf Hitler, April 11, 1942, in “Hitler's Table-Talk at the Führer's Headquarters 1941—1942,” Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaeum Verlag, Bonn, 1951)

Twenty-seven words first published in 1790 are now the source of the bitterest controversy the USA has seen since the 1960s if not since the War Between the States a century before that. They are central to an issue that splits left and right, male and female, white and nonwhite, North and South, East and West, wealthy and not-so wealthy.
They are:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Let's get this straight right away. First of all, the inalienable right of individuals to keep and bear arms as a check on a tyrannical government predates our Declaration of Independence and Constitution. This, among other things, was clearly and eloquently expressed in Sir William Blackstone's 1768 "Commentaries On The Laws of England.” Hence, the Founders were operating within a long historical tradition based upon English common law.

Secondly, the term “well-regulated” meant something quite different two centuries ago. It is not today's definition of “controlled,” “limited,” or “restricted” but was instead defined as “having proper kit and provisions” or in the case of objects or machinery, “properly maintained and kept in good repair.” The next is the Constitutional definition of the “militia,” and this what requires detailed explanation. The militia issue was extensively debated during the 1787—89 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia and today has sadly been ignored by both sides in this issue.

Founder George Mason explicitly wished to have it clearly spelled out that the militia was “of the whole people," in effect, a “general militia” that was affirmed in the Second Amendment and the 1792 Militia Act. Mason and his supporters feared the development of "special militias" — ones much like the Puritan "Roundheads" led by Oliver Cromwell and their opponents, the “Cavaliers,” in the English Civil War of 1642—57. Special militias are nothing more than state-sanctioned paramilitary groups — witness the German Nazi SA and its successor the SS as well as the Italian Fascist "Blackshirts." In those cases, Nazi/Fascist Party membership was strictly required to join them as well as to legally own a firearm of any kind in either of those countries at the time.

These two groups were little different than standing armies. The difference is that they were created and used by the German and Italian governments to bypass any laws against using the military domestically against the people (or in the absence of such laws, to forestall the military's unwillingness to do so) — in order to crush dissent and terrorize opponents. (Sound familiar?) Cromwell used his Roundheads to do much the same thing, even having King Charles I beheaded after a bogus trial, later closing Parliament and then invading Ireland with plans to wipe out the Catholic population, killing those of his comrades and anyone else who refused to comply.
Distressingly, we now have a lot of special militias in the USA — the Secret Service, FBI, BATF, DEA, IRS, the National Guard and today's "near federalized" status of most state and local police departments — to name but a few. And they are all unconstitutional, if the plain meaning of the 2nd Amendment and the 1792 Militia Act is correct. George Mason's fears about them were well placed and have come tragically true. All these alphabet-soup special militias can do and have done (other than freely lapping up taxpayer money in ever-increasing amounts) is be responsible for numerous cruel and meaningless tragedies. These range from spying on, harassing and ruining the lives of anyone deemed an “enemy of the state,” to brutally breaking strikes, violently disrupting demonstrations and killing innocent people in places ranging from Kent State to Ruby Ridge and Waco.

Even the courts are beginning to revive this long forgotten but crucial “general vs. special” militia distinction. The 1990 Supreme Court case Perpich vs. Department of Defense is a case in point. Then Minnesota Gov. Rudy Perpich claimed the DoD violated the Constitution when it ordered the Minnesota National Guard (which he claimed was the 'state militia') to duty outside the state without his consent or that of the state legislature.

The Supreme Court ruled against Perpich. It held the National Guard is an integral component of the US Army Reserve system (it has been since 1916). It further supported its ruling by specifying the difference between the “special militia” (in this case the Minnesota Guard) instead of the “general militia” (citizens with privately procured and owned arms) as expressed in the 2nd Amendment. Also in 1990 the Court in another case affirmed the definition of “the people” expressed in the Bill of Rights as meaning individual persons, not a group.

So the statist left has its “militia” and the rest of us have ours. No wonder so many of them can't free themselves from the false but mesmerizing aura of the “Militia = National Guard” equation. The statist left doesn't want to because it's interested not in the right of individuals to protect their lives and liberty against a tyrannical federal government, but in giving that tyrannical federal government a blank check, figuratively and literally, to indulge in state-sponsored terror under the tautological trinity of “crime prevention," "anti-terrorism" and "national security.” And Clinton Defense Secretary William Cohen has all but told us to “get used to the idea.”
So there it is. General militia versus special militia.
Which are you?

Think about that question the next time you are cajoled by otherwise-idle Million Mom March mavens to support “sensible gun laws” or are exhorted by the denizens of the pseudo-patriotic “law-and-order” crowd to “back the badge.”
Published in the May 26, 2000 issue of Ether Zone.
May 26, 2000
Michael E. Kreca lived in San Diego and had been a financial reporter for Knight-Ridder, Business Week and the Financial Times of London. On February 11, 2006, he was shot to death by a government cop.
Copyright © 2000 Ether Zone


47 states revolt against Obama gun control

Thursday, January 17, 2013
Thousands of gun owners across America have had enough of the Obama administration’s attack on the Second Amendment – and they’re preparing to take their concerns to the capitols in at least 47 states this Saturday at 12 p.m.
Texan Eric Reed, founder and national coordinator of the “Guns Across America” rallies, told WND he’s irritated about all the talk of new gun-control regulations and overreach by the federal government in violation of our Second Amendment rights.
“I was trying to figure out why people weren’t being more proactive about this, Reed said. “Then I realized I’m part of the problem. It takes somebody to stand up and say, ‘Hey, we’re not going to accept this. We’re against it.’
“We want Americans who feel the same way to come out. We want to stand up, be united and get our point across.”

Ryan: GOP Considering Short-Term Debt-Limit Increase Thursday, 17 Jan 2013 02:48 PM
NOTA: and... that's exactly what obama want. Are you stupid, because according with Forrest Gun "STUPID IS WHO STUPID DOES" LRGM

Republicans in the House of Representatives may press only for a short-term extension of U.S. borrowing authority to keep up pressure for significant spending cuts, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said Thursday.
Ryan, breaking a public silence since his failed vice presidential bid in the November election, said the Obama administration can and should prioritize payments to avoid a debt default in the event that an increase in the federal debt limit is delayed.

Urgent:
Do You Agree with Boehner and Obama's Tax Compromise? Vote Now.

Discussing his party's budget strategy with reporters at a retreat for newly sworn-in House Republicans, Ryan stopped short of threatening to push the country into default if the party's spending cut demands are not met.

But he said Republicans were considering the best approach to use their leverage over looming fiscal deadlines in February and March to reduce deficits.
"We believe that it would be wrong if we walk out of this spring with no achievement on debt reduction whatsoever because that will hurt the country, that will hurt the economy," Ryan said.
Among options under consideration are a short-term increase in the debt limit, Ryan said without specifying a time frame.
"We're discussing the possible virtue of a short-term debt limit extension, so that we have a better chance of getting the Senate and White House involved in discussions in March."
The first of the fiscal deadlines, the exhaustion of federal borrowing capacity, will happen sometime between mid-February and mid-March. The second deadline, the delayed launch of automatic spending cuts, will occur on March 1. And a third deadline comes on March 27, as Congress must enact new funding for government agencies and programs.
Asked if he was willing to "shoot the hostage" and allow the United States go into default over spending cut demands, Ryan said he was "not willing to use any metaphors like that at all."
© 2013 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

35 STATES AND COUNTING. MIL AMIGOS DE HOLGUIN.
Found this interesting, Children of congress member do not have to pay back their college student loans. How nice!

Monday on Fox news they learned that the staffers of Congress family members are exempt from having to pay back student loans. This will get national attention if other news networks will broadcast it. When you add this to the below, just where will all of it stop?

35 States file lawsuit against the Federal Government

Governors of 35 states have filed suit against the Federal Government for imposing unlawful burdens upon them. It only takes 38 (of the 50) States to convene a Constitutional Convention.

This will take less than thirty seconds to read. If you agree, please pass it on.

This is an idea that we should address.

For too long we have been too complacent about the workings of Congress. Many citizens had no idea that members of Congress could retire with the same pay after only one term, that they specifically exempted themselves from many of the laws they have passed (such as being exempt from any fear of prosecution for sexual harassment) while ordinary citizens must live under those laws. The latest is to exempt themselves from the Healthcare Reform... in all of its forms. Somehow, that doesn't seem logical. We do not have an elite that is above the law. I truly don't care if they are Democrat, Republican, Independent or whatever. The self-serving must stop.

If each person that receives this will forward it on to 20 people, in three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one proposal that really should be passed around.

Proposed 28th Amendment to the United States Constitution: "Congress shall make no law that applies to the citizens of the United States that does not apply equally to the Senators and/or Representatives; and, Congress shall make no law that applies to the Senators and/or Representatives that does not apply equally to the citizens of the United States."

·         URGENT: Liberty Alert from KrisAnnehall.com‏

To lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com
Having trouble viewing this email?

Click here

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?llr=5xcrkjkab&v=001v2ezZPmZ_iseIhU0tPPbRHi9jA-aNmsPym1k1itzbkxi058w6RXhMOpz1VfqHEERtqgJlbwHXn3XKVdMtD_t5KK67k_d9r3_9NQpXnfzi4yQXnOdrCqR6WUKbT5pvwSdIk0rJliwOWXy2A1lBRCj2Q%3D%3D



[http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001gYzM_XWdKX_q6Co0RuohgVvNjFJEshMxkb4zy9Ie3csU7WwZsDxKKNMnVhO-mrSUd5ufVLMsdqUhM4woEAsKfUlttJiZlzQabjX7HFEmn2pq3BM-oegKSkdqdPVZdkycRYJZHv1Y-jmR9zquo-HaJ0EivCAfvKohg9jxWhRxR58mX2YjJGExaGEhbDq8x7eD72la5as-z24NMObo3CmZDI2h-x_kMpn1GB_zcRAemKZmkfodTZmkuQ==]



 

Dear Lazaro R.,

 

The Second Amendment reads: 

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right

of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. 

That word "infringed" means to violate or transgress.  That means the federal government

is completely forbidden to even regulate the possession of Arms.  But Washington

 DC wants us to believe that it simply a matter of common sense that some guns should

be regulated and even banned.

There are three things we must understand if we are going to be able to maintain

 the Second Amendment as our founders intended

 

1. Who are the Militia?

 

2. What is the "security of a free State"?

 

3. What is the meaning of "infringed"?



 

Washington Has Failed Us.  They Have Failed in Their Oath.  They Have Failed the

 Constitution.



We the People must answer these questions using the definitions used by the Framers

of the Constitution

 

Barak Obama told this nation yesterday that the Second Amendment only applies to

 hunting, sports, personal protection, and collecting.  Is this the Second Amendment

our Founders had in mind?  What would THEY say to Obama in response?

 

The REAL Gun Control Debate:

 

I have prepared for youthe REAL DEBATE that should be happening...Barak Obama vs.

The Founding Fathers on Gun Control.See the Words

of the writers of the Second Amendment side by side with those of Barak Obama.This

is the argumen thatREAL GUN LOVINGrepresentatives should be making. So why aren't

they? Read the argument of George Mason, Noah Webster, Richard Henry Lee, and Daniel

Webster as they go toe to toe with Barak Obama. And thenYOU MAKE THE CHOICE. Who

 is the winner of this Constitutional Debate?

READ: Shall Not Be Infringed? [http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001gYzM_XWdKX-GGm1oIO3ou4uYB2Ke7ifC2RExdQyWj4_T1Lag0EiKbSlVD__VE0A7L4oWdqRM0r1oUr5_jSqi8VjOpC_6ltpwYk6lWGFNScCkfQ6dscCM25scmHkfO4nfPbeAHdu4rq7s2YWsDyZJMKqMwiHvumU1CxQ3wxmsQYmGnf7JHKuKTtkvZQ05292CetNndi9YQoMza7tud21NePR5ioF8FCwsjKsDKjJ7-jD6kva4eE9JR9K_qWgfefwOpFocjdiRBfiqx7qRZQjrtVRCL4CcYKUlLbvEt1hCvKI1B3ZINRzRZg==]



Let ours be the generation that listens from the framers and their experience. Let

ours be the generation that avoids what others called the inevitable demise of a

 Republican government. Let ours be the generation that can claim the victory of

 Liberty for our future generations. 

In Liberty to the Bitter End, 

KrisAnne Hall

KrisAnnehall.com [http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001gYzM_XWdKX_q6Co0RuohgVvNjFJEshMxkb4zy9Ie3csU7WwZsDxKKNMnVhO-mrSUd5ufVLMsdqUhM4woEAsKfUlttJiZlzQabjX7HFEmn2pq3BM-oegKSkdqdPVZdkycRYJZHv1Y-jmR9zquo-HaJ0EivCAfvKohg9jxWhRxR58mX2YjJGExaGEhbDq8x7eD72la5as-z24NMObo3CmZDI2h-x_kMpn1GB_zcRAemKZmkfodTZmkuQ==] 

Here is what you will find in THIS email 

3 Questions we MUST have answers to regarding gun control.

Who is Responsible for proper preservation of the Second Amendment?

The REAL Gun Control Debate!

Take a Look!

Don't Miss This!

 

Frustrated wondering WHAT can be done to RESTORE AMERICA?  This book will give every

reader 10 thingswe can all do to turn this nation back to its foundational principles!

HELP RESTORE AMERICA!

Take a Look! [http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001gYzM_XWdKX-5Hyb5J9VrQMI3XULCl3HonurIHWw-H33k5w_m44h8DIz43vF96G9Hq4mJFVjIndQU6u8MjhgdLnzwZhtzogfbtbw9xJYxDMgYEtHLlbRlEHxVny88WlVyoZOqHIyvun6Y00ZjywmybBqu1yo7i1Firjgwj1jJLPS0zSiZqxHsiWO9UjFNC6C18V-JXE7glx-ujJF4M8u043y5q3auJ4Oz7PU3HK69JxEnYGXGrQNWYyuK0UX042THnS0QjankZwzzB3ULKUdAWTx8WMuNmMRk]

 

Forward this email

http://ui.constantcontact.com/sa/fwtf.jsp?llr=5xcrkjkab&m=1110562081534&ea=lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com&a=1112179330738 

This email was sent to lazarorgonzalez@hotmail.com by krisanne@krisannehall.com. 

Update Profile/Email Address

http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=oo&mse=001ZOpcJZ9gBKnIJB0lSgHnJGxu8G1hmUMB&t=001pNOolYtQSnR7DFNe8BFR9Q%3D%3D&llr=5xcrkjkab 

Instant removal with SafeUnsubscribe(TM)

http://visitor.constantcontact.com/do?p=un&mse=001ZOpcJZ9gBKnIJB0lSgHnJGxu8G1hmUMB&t=001pNOolYtQSnR7DFNe8BFR9Q%3D%3D&llr=5xcrkjkab

Privacy Policy:

http://ui.constantcontact.com/roving/CCPrivacyPolicy.jsp

http://www.constantcontact.com/home.jsp?pn=alturner&cc=TEM_News_233 

KrisAnnehall.com | P.O. Box 26 | Welborn | FL | 32094

The year is 1910, over one hundred years ago.
What a difference a century makes! Enviado por Miriam Pinedo.
Here are some statistics for the Year 1910:
************ ********* ************
The average life expectancy for men was 47 years.
Fuel for this car was sold in drug stores only.
Only 14 percent of the homes had a bathtub.
Only 8 percent of the homes had a telephone.
There were only 8,000 cars and only 144 miles of paved roads.
The maximum speed limit in most cities was 10 mph.
The tallest structure in the world was the Eiffel Tower !
The average US wage in 1910 was 22 cents per hour.
The average US worker made between $200 and $400 per year.
A competent accountant could expect to earn $2000
per year, a dentist $2,500 per year, a veterinarian
between $1,500 and $4,000 per year, and a
mechanical engineer about $5,000 per year.
More than 95 percent of all births took place at HOME.
Ninety percent of all Doctors had NO COLLEGE EDUCATION!
Instead, they attended so-called medical schools, many of which
were condemned in the press AND the government as 'substandard.'
Sugar cost four cents a pound.
Eggs were fourteen cents a dozen.
Coffee was fifteen cents a pound.
Most women only washed their hair once a month,
and used Borax or egg yolks for shampoo.
Canada passed a law that prohibited poor people from
entering into their country for any reason.
The Five leading causes of death were:
1. Pneumonia and influenza
2. Tuberculosis
3. Diarrhea
4. Heart disease
5. Stroke
The American flag had 45 stars.
The population of Las Vegas , Nevada was only 30!
Crossword puzzles, canned beer, and iced tea hadn't been invented yet.
There was no Mother's Day or Father's Day.
Two out of every 10 adults couldn't read or write and only
6 percent of all Americans had graduated from high school.
Marijuana, heroin, and morphine were all available
over the counter at the local corner drugstores.
Back then pharmacists said, 'Heroin clears the complexion, gives
buoyancy to the mind, regulates the stomach and bowels,
and is, in fact, a perfect guardian of health'

Eighteen percent of households had at least one full-time servant or domestic help.
There were about 230 reported murders in the ENTIRE U.S.A. !

Try to imagine what it may be like in another 100 years.

Laugh when you can, 
apologize when you should,
and let go of what you can't change. 
Life's too short to be anything... but happy

Colunna de Ricardo Samitier:

Una Prueba Más De la Decadencia De  Norte América Y Europa…  Raúl Castro El Nuevo líder de América Latina Parece una broma, pero no lo es: A finales de este mes, la Comunidad de 33 países de América Latina y el Caribe (CELAC) - una organización de dos años de edad, que enumera la promoción de la democracia entre sus objetivos principales - jurará al dictador cubano Raúl Castro como su nuevo presidente.Lee más aquí: http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/01/16/3186072/latin-americas-new-leader-raul.html#emlnl=Five_Minute_Herald
From the World Health Organization:
The latest Murder Statistics
Murders per 100,000 citizens
Honduras 91.6
El Salvador 69.2
Cote d'lvoire 56.9
Jamaica 52.2
Venezuela 45.1
Belize 41.4
US Virgin Islands 39.2
Guatemala 38.5
Saint Kits and Nevis 38.2
Zambia 38.0
Uganda 36.3
Malawi 36.0
Lesotho 35.2
Trinidad and Tobago 35.2
Colombia 33.4
South Africa 31.8
Congo 30.8
Central African Republic 29.3
Bahamas 27.4
Puerto Rico 26.2
Saint Lucia 25.2
Dominican Republic 25.0
Tanzania 24.5
Sudan 24.2
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 22.9
Ethiopia 22.5
Guinea 22.5
Dominica 22.1
Burundi 21.7
Democratic Republic of the Congo 21.7
Panama 21.6
Brazil 21.0
Equatorial Guinea 20.7
Guinea-Bissau 20.2
Kenya 20.1
Kyrgyzstan 20.1
Cameroon 19.7
Otserrat 19.7
Greenland 19.2
Angola 19.0
Guyana 18.6
Burkina Faso 18.0
Eritrea 17.8
Namibia 17.2
Rwanda 17.1
Mexico 16.9
Chad 15.8
Ghana 15.7
Ecuador 15.2
North Korea 15.2
Benin 15.1
Sierra Leone 14.9
Mauritania 14.7
Botswana 14.5
Zimbabwe 14.3
Gabon 13.8
Nicaragua 13.6
French Guiana 13.3
Papua New Guinea 13.0
Swaziland 12.9
Bermuda 12.3
Comoros 12.2
Nigeria 12.2
Cape Verde 11.6
Grenada 11.5
Paraguay 11.5
Barbados 11.3
Togo 10.9
Gambia 10.8
Peru 10.8
Myanmar 10.2
Russia 10.2
iberia 10.1
Costa Rica 10.0
Nauru 9.8
Bolivia 8.9          
Mozambique 8.8          
Kazakhstan 8.8
Senegal 8.7
Turks and Caicos Islands 8.7
Mongolia 8.7
British Virgin Islands 8.6
Cayman Islands 8.4
Seychelles 8.3
Madagascar 8.1
Indonesia 8.1
Mali 8.0
Pakistan 7.8
Moldova 7.5
Kiribati 7.3
Guadeloupe 7.0
Haiti 6.9
Timor-Leste 6.9
Anguilla 6.8
Antigua and Barbuda 6.8
Lithuania 6.6
Uruguay 5.9
Philippines 5.4
Ukraine 5.2
Estonia 5.2
Cuba 5.0
Belarus 4.9
Thailand 4.8
Suriname 4.6
Laos 4.6
Georgia 4.3
Martinique 4.2
ALL the countries listed above have a 
100% gun ban.... And... 
The United States:  4.2 
Cómo Ganar $ 24 Millones
Sin Correr Ningún Riesgo ....

Deutsche Bank fue uno de los bancos "Too Big To Fail”
DEMACIADO GRANDES PARA QUEBRAR...que estaban jugando en la tasa LIBOR. (Ver enlace más abajo)
Todos sabemos ahora, que los "bancos" estaban arreglando la tasa LIBOR que regula los intereses.
Las personas que conocía, lo que la tasa real iba a ser, podría obtener un beneficio.
¿ Usted se preguntara; cuándo puede ser ese beneficio?
Que le parece ganar 24 millones de dólares, por cada un cien de un punto porcentual!
¡Eso Es! 24 Millones De Dinero Gratis.
Ese dinero debería haber ido a los inversores y ahorradores (usted y yo).
En su lugar, fue a los banqueros, libre de riesgos. Esa es la razón por la cual, la economía se está ahogando y no está creciendo!
Todos los beneficios, se lo chupan, la gente de arriba!
No hay beneficio dejado para él economía real! (Usted y yo y otros no banqueros)  
Pero, ¿Cómo ocultan esta actividad del Gobierno, de los reguladores y del mercado?
Respuesta es fácil, hasta los bobos los saben. Hace ya años... Cuando alguien los denuncia...  Ellos sólo paga una multa.  Que es una pequeña fracción de sus ganancias!
Es un negocio Libre de riesgo, eso sí solo para los
"Too Big To Fail Banks" que se traduce también como: "Demasiado Grandes Para Ir A La Cárcel"
¡Esto está sucediendo en USA la primera república democrática... donde como en cualquier dictadura hay personas "especiales" que son demasiado importantes como para ir a la cárcel.
Existe una simple palabra para describir esta actividad ... Fraude y Corrupción .
Comencemos por el fraude que es un delito... fácil de probar.
Cuando se comete fraude, los autores son arrestado y encarcelado. Pero no en la administración de Obama.
Eso se llama... Corrupción, estilo americano de Obama!
¿Crees que Bill Clinton fue un presidente corrupto?
Cuando los historiadores tengan acceso con los registros de la administración Obama, dentro de 20 años. Vamos a aprender entonces, ¿Quién Y Cómo Fue Hecho?
Pero, En 20 Años, Será Demasiado Tarde!
Los medios de comunicación sólo están preocupa por la destrucción de la 2 ª Enmienda y el público está preocupado por la Super Bowl, los políticos se entretienen jugando con la proponer como fijar el techo de la deuda, que NO ES EL VERDADERO PROBLEMA... la bomba de tiempo es el Dólar.
Todo el mundo estará interesado y afectado, cuando el dólar se desploma debido a esta corrupción. Debido a que, toda esta corrupción se está produciendo en Dólares! No en Pesos o rublos o ruppees.
Estamos acostumbrados a reírse de la corrupción en otros países... nadie se va a reír, cuando llegue a los EE.UU.!
Las víctimas finales, ES TODO EL MUNDO... y la mitad de ellos van a celebrar la caída del dólar... y después lloraran!
La caída del dólar, que es la moneda más grande de todos los tiempos, está llegando!
Ese es su plan. Para el establecimiento del Régimen Feudal nuevamente... y en América y Europa le van echar la culpa a los chinos.
La culpa no es de China. La culpa esta aquí en Nueva York y se encuentra en Wall Street.
Abre los ojos. Cambia los dólares ahora, pon todos tus ahorros en plata y oro. Defiéndete contra los criminales!
No utilices su moneda, cuando usted invierte en sus acciones, bonos u opciones, usted está poniendo su confianza en un documento de papel  moneda manipulado por ellos.
Usa dinero real para todos tus ahorros. El dinero que ha sido dinero desde que el mundo es mundo.
El Federal Reserve están todos los días oficialmente imprimiendo dólares y se los dan a los “Banqueros” amigos de Obama...
Son 40 MIL MILLONES DE DOLARES AL MES y quizás dan mucho, mucho más que no se dice... quizás no destruyen como dicen los billetes viejos... yo por lo menos NO CONFIO en ningún burócrata...
Todos sabemos... Que Esa Impresión De Papel Moneda...  No Puede Seguir Para Siempre. Cuando esa burbuja estalle, se acabó el juego, por  el dólar de EE.UU... y también del Euro... que sigue la misma política...
Prepárate AHORA! El juego esta amañado y el Gobierno, es el cómplice y tu el CHIVO EXPIATORIO...  
¿No lo crees? Hazte esta pregunta: ¿En quién puedes confiar tus ahorros?
A un banquero o a ti mismo... Vende tus dólares, comprar oro y plata!
Aquí tienes el ultimo articulo del Fraude cometido por todos los Bancos, pues todos lucraron con los intereses, aunque el articulo se refiere al Deutsche Bank el banco Alemán con mas juicios hipotecario en la Florida...
Reagan metió en la cárcel a unos 1,000 banqueros... Obama a ninguno... a pesar de que el robo ahora ha sido mil veces mayor...




Participan en “En mi opinión” Alberto L. Pérez “amenper”, Alexis Ortiz, Amb. Armando Valladares, Annie González, Ing. Armando López Calleja, J. Fresno, Bárbara Fernández, Carlos Bringuier, Efraín Sinaí, Eladio José Armesto, Enrique Enríquez, Enrique de Diego,  Erick Ruiz, Emigdio Prado, Gerardo Alfredo DeSola, Georgina López, Gustavo Rojas, Héctor Molina, Héctor Lemange Sando, Irmende Méndez, Jesús Angulo, Jesús Marzo Fernández, Jorge A Villalon, Jorge Aguiar , José y Marcia Caula, J Fresno, Luis Pensado, Lili Samways, Manny Fernández, Margarita Sánchez, María Argelia Vizcaíno, May De La Vega, Mil amigos de Holguín, Miriam Pinedo, Miriam Dopico, Margarita Sánchez, Marlene, Martha Ruiz, María  Lahullier, Olga Griñan, Oscar Díaz, Philip V. Riggio, Raúl Barroso, Reinaldo López  jr, Ricardo Samitier, Rolando Antonio Lara, Sergio Bello, Sofía Iduate, Sonia “Chuchin” Castell, Tony Flores, V J Marino, William Benard, Victor M Caamaño, http://news.yahoo.com, NoticieroDigital.com , CNN Español, LaNuevaNacion.com, TheBLAZE.com, The WesternCenterforJournalism.com, LastResistance.com, NewsMax.com, RealClearPolitics.com, GOPUSA.com, LIGNET.com, TheTradingReport.com, Beforeit’sNews.com,

Editor Lázaro R González Miño

MrLazaroRGonzalez.blogspot.com 

No comments:

Post a Comment