.“EN MI OPINION”
‘IN GOD WE TRUST’.
. Martes, 29 2013
No 304
Editor Lázaro R González Miño .
Obama Is An Illegitimate President Says Attorney. The rundown on our Impostor-in-Chief, Barack Hussein Obama. http://www.westernjournalism.com/obama-is-an-illegitimate-president-says-attorney/
WND EXCLUSIVE
New details surface on Iran nuclear explosion.
What we are going to wait... The next Iran Nuclear explosion be in The Central Park in New York?
"En mi opinión" Editor Lázaro R González Mino.
Many said to be trapped underground
Published: 7 hours ago
Reza Kahlili,
author of the award-winning book "A Time to Betray", served in CIA Directorate of Operations, as a spy in
the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, counterterrorism expert; currently serves on the
Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an advisory board authorized by
Congress and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI).
He regularly appears in national and international media as an expert on Iran
and counterterrorism in the Middle East.More ↓
The source who provided the initial information on the explosion at Fordow has now provided details of the explosion and the degree of the destruction at one of Iran’s most important nuclear sites.
The report, published exclusively on WND on Jan. 24, is being covered internationally by major media, with independent intelligence sources confirming the explosion for the Times of London and the German Die Welt.
But White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters Monday: “We have no information to confirm the allegations in the report and we do not believe the report is credible.”
The short White House response, the source said, is an indication that the United States wants to steer away from the subject as any covert operation against the regime’s nuclear installations will have consequences, including retaliation.
Get the inside story in Reza Kahlili’s “A Time To Betray” and learn how the Islamic regime “bought the bomb” in “Atomic Iran.”
The Islamic regime’s media, in a coordinated effort, reflected a similarly short response Sunday night in its denial, and Monday remained silent.
A senior researcher and director of the Centre for Arab & Iranian Studies in London, Dr. Ali Reza Nourizadeh, who has many contacts in Iran, confirmed that the explosion had trapped many inside.
According WND’s source, a member of the security forces protecting Fordow, 36 North Korean technicians and military officers arrived in Tehran on Jan. 15 and 17 and subsequently visited two Iranian nuclear sites under heavy security. One site, still unknown to the West with its vast installation of centrifuges, will be revealed soon on WND. At the other, the Fordow site, the North Koreans were to witness the startup of six cascades of 174 new-generation, speedier centrifuges.
Hamidreza Zakeri, a former member of the regime’s Intelligence Ministry, said 17 technicians and two military supervisors are stationed at the secret site and 14 technicians and two military officers were at Fordow.
The source said a log on closed-circuit cameras installed by the regime to monitor the site’s three centrifuge chambers and two highly enriched uranium reserves gave this account:
- On Jan 21, 14 members of the North Korean team and two military officers now stationed at Fordow along with Iranian scientists started the process of feeding uranium gas into the newly set-up cascades at 9:15 a.m. Tehran time
- At 10:43 a.m., due to a drop in power pressure, system warning signs went off, but everything went back to normal after two minutes.
- At 11:36 a.m., five explosions occurred concurrently in the centrifuge chambers, two explosions in the uranium reserve enclosures and a subsequent explosion in the main hallway close to the exit.
- At the time of the explosions, a very bright red and purple light distorted the image and an extremely loud noise could be heard. Before the explosions knocked out the cameras, interior walls could be seen coming down within the centrifuge chambers. All the explosions seemed to have been initiated from the ceilings.
- All cameras on the lowest floor (about 300 feet deep under a mountain) and the floor above it (about 250 feet deep) were knocked out, and only two cameras above the installation where security personnel are stationed were working.
- Security forces immediately informed their superiors, who ordered them to remain in the monitoring room and avoid further communication with the outside world until counterintelligence forces arrived. Twenty-one personnel were gathered in a conference room to await further instruction.
- Security forces were then told to close down all surrounding roads.
- Approximately two hours after the explosions, counterintelligence agents arrived and, after interviewing personnel and reviewing tapes, initially concluded that explosives may have been placed in ceiling lamps with some kind of trigger mechanism controlled by a power voltage frequency.
- The last images show eight personnel in anti-radiation clothing trying desperately to secure one of the rooms.
Iranian authorities fear that opening the site from the outside in a rescue mission could possibly release radiation and uranium gas or cause further explosions, which could contaminate thousands of people living nearby, the source said.
As of Monday, the regime had not come up with any concrete rescue plan, though more than 200 people remain trapped, including the North Koreans, he said. He added that an agreement reached last September between North Korea and Iran called for further collaboration on Iran’s nuclear bomb project and the arming of missiles with nuclear warheads.
Another source in the Intelligence Ministry said that in a meeting Monday among top officials, including President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, it was decided that the international community would be kept in the dark about the disaster because any validation would undermine their current negotiating power with the 5+1 world powers.
It would also undermine the regime from within should Iranians react to its illicit nuclear activity and the international sanctions it caused, which are being felt deeply.
The source added that the regime is contemplating showing old images of the interior of the site to buy time until it can accurately estimate the extent of damage and possible loss of lives. Ahmadinejad will hold a parliamentary meeting behind closed doors on this issue on Thursday.
Despite severe international pressure and sanctions, Iran had refused to halt the 20 percent uranium enrichment process at Fordow. It takes only weeks to further enrich the stock at the 20 percent level to weaponization grade for a nuclear bomb.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/new-details-surface-on-iran-nuclear-explosion/#si0J34raKIp4Sb4z.99
¿Puede ser posible?
En Estados Unidos, como en Gran Bretaña, Rusia y muchos otros países occidentales, el sistema permite por ejemplo que el Presidente introduzca cambios legislativos sin debate político ninguno a través de las Órdenes Ejecutivas.
Ordenes ejecutivas solamente en Estados Unidos
· OE 10990 que permite al Gobierno tener el control absoluto
de todos los transportes por carretera y puertos
· OE 10995 que permite al Gobierno tener el control absoluto
de todos los medios de comunicación y formas de comunicación
· OE 10998 permite al Gobierno controlar todas las formas
energía y minerales
· OE 10999 permite la incautación de todas las granjas
agrícolas y medios de producción
· OE 11000 da al Gobierno el control total sobre los ciudadanos
para forzarles a trabajar donde y cuando sean ordenados. Esto incluye el
derecho a dividir a las familias
· OE 11001 da al Gobierno el control absoluto de la salud,
educación y servicios sociales
· OE 11002 el derecho a Registrar y fichar a todos los
hombres, mujeres y niños de EE.UU.
· OE 11003 el control de todos los aeropuertos y aviación
· OE 11004 permite incautarse de toda la vivienda y finanzas y
forzar a la gente a dejarles en lo que se denomina “Areas Designadas forzadas
de Recolocación”
· OE 11005 el control absoluto sobre ferrocarriles, vías de
agua e instalaciones de almacenamiento
·
OE 11051 subraya el
papel de la Oficina de Planificación de Emergencias y le da derecho a activar
todas las Ordenes Ejecutivas en momentos de “tensiones internacionales y crisis
económica y financiera”
· OE 11921 permite a la Agencia Federal de Preparación de
Emergencias desarrollar planes para control sobre los mecanismo de producción y
distribución de medios de energía, salarios, crédito y flujo monetario en
cualquier emergencia nacional indefinida
· OE 12919 firmada por el Presidente Clinton en Junio de 1994
que dispone todas las órdenes anteriores mencionadas aquí bajo una sola Orden
De manera que sólo hace falta que se
active una crisis, y ya vamos entendiendo quién y cómo las activan, para que
las leyes nacionales de Estados Unidos y todos los instrumentos democráticos de
este país se anulen por completo y se declare (en silencio, por supuesto) una
dictadura di facto, con todos los poderes bajo el control absoluto del
Gobierno.
Todo lo que se considere “racismo” o
“xenofobia” seria delito. Y por supuesto, la definición de ambas cosas la
ofrecen ellos también; prevemos que una opinión crítica sobre la masiva llegada
de inmigrantes, ante la pasividad de los Gobiernos o la libre manifestación de
una opinión en contra de que los empleos de los ciudadanos de un país se
pierdan y pasen a manos de inmigrantes que harían el trabajo por la mitad de sueldo,
eso ya serían actos de “xenofobia”.
Y de esa forma, se va ejecutando a paso
firme la agenda del Nuevo Orden Mundial con el control de cuatro
territorios en el planeta Tierra.El Gobierno Mundial (con un Banco Central Mundial, un ejército mundial y una población bajo control mediático y mental) dirigiría cuatro zonas geográficas:
1. la Unión Europea (una evolución de la Comunidad Económica
Europea)
2. la Unión Americana (una evolución del tratado NAFTA)
3. la Unión Pacífica (evolución de la APEC)
4. la Unión Africana (evolución de la OAU)
El estado supercentralizado ya está
dividiendo el mundo en regiones administrativas para cuando los estados
nacionales y países desaparezcan.State Bill Would Nullify Federal Laws
Monday, January 28,
2013
Mississippi
defied the union during the Civil War and civil rights era, and at least two
lawmakers think it is time to do so again.Republican state Reps. Gary Chism and Jeff Smith, both of Columbus, filed a bill this month to form the Joint Legislative Committee on the Neutralization of Federal Laws.
Chism said Thursday that the tea party-backed measure is a response to President Barack Obama’s federal health care overhaul and proposals to curb gun violence.
“Certainly, the Obamacare started this,” Chism told The Associated Press, referring to the health care plan, “but then gun show loopholes that the president wanted after Newtown really put an exclamation on that — that we need to do something to stand up for the Tenth Amendment.”
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says powers not specifically reserved for the federal government are reserved for the states.
House Constitution Committee Chairman Scott DeLano, R-Biloxi, said the bill has a good chance of being debated and that he has heard from other lawmakers who support it.
But Mississippi College constitutional law professor Matt Steffey said the measure is a waste of time because federal law trumps state law when the two are in conflict.
“It is hard to imagine a less productive use of time by key legislative officials than to pursue that which they have no power to pursue,” Steffey said.
Republican Gov. Phil Bryant last week asked legislators to block enforcement of “any unconstitutional order” from Obama regarding guns.
Read more: http://patriotupdate.com/2013/01/mississippi-pushes-nullification-of-federal-laws/#ixzz2JMze4NbP
545 dirty People vs. 315’229,000 of US
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it us follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines is in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...
If they do not receive social security but is on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.
Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people and they alone, are responsible.
They and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.
Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.
Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!
Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.
Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.
Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.
Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.
Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.
Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.
When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.
Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...
Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'
When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What in the heck happened? Can you spell ’politicians?'
I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!
GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!
Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them. Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?
Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?
You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.
You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.
You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.
You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.
You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.
One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.
I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.
I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don’t care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.
Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.
What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits. The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.
The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. Who is the speaker of the House? John Boehner. He is the leader of the majority party. He and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want. If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.
It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it us follow that what exists is what they want to exist.
If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.
If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.
If the Army & Marines is in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ...
If they do not receive social security but is on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.
There are no insoluble government problems.
Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.
Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.
Those 545 people and they alone, are responsible.
They and they alone, have the power.
They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses.
Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees...
We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.
Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.
Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!
Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.
Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.
Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.
Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.
Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.
Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.
When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.
Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...
Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'
When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What in the heck happened? Can you spell ’politicians?'
I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!
GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!
Should Women Be Allowed to Serve in Combat? Vote in Urgent Poll Here
Rubio Responds to Jeb: I Never Pushed 'Piecemeal Approach' to Immigration Reform
Monday, 28
Jan 2013 06:18 PM
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio tells Newsmax TV in an
exclusive interview that if the press is “looking for friction and conflict
between Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio, they’re barking up the wrong tree.”
The first-term senator was responding to news reports that he and the former Florida governor are bumping heads on the immigration issue — especially after Bush wrote last week in The Wall Street Journal that any effort to address immigration on a piecemeal basis is “short-sighted and self-defeating.”
Rubio had been on record as arguing for a "piecemeal" approach — one in which different elements of broad immigration reform would be taken up as a series of bills, rather than one comprehensive piece of legislation.
Adding to the drama is that both Rubio and Bush are on the short list of GOP favorites for a presidential run in 2016.
Editor's Note: Get 'An American Son', Marco Rubio's Memoir for Only $2.95! Click Here!
But Rubio told Newsmax on Monday that the bipartisan immigration plan announced on Capitol Hill Monday is neither piecemeal nor based on amnesty. He was among the senators who introduced the plan — and many of his ideas to reform immigration that he has been discussing in recent weeks were included in it.
“I don’t think I’d ever call for a piecemeal approach,” Rubio said. “Immigration needs to be dealt with comprehensively. I just don’t know it should be dealt with in one comprehensive bill.
“I’ve always said that maybe the better way to do this is to file four or five separate bills," he explained. "For example, one bill that modernizes legal immigration, one bill that does enforcement, and one bill that deals with the 11 million people who are already here illegally.
“Piecemeal, in my mind, and what he was talking about was, only doing, for example, a high-tech bill and not addressing anything else. Or only doing an enforcement part of the bill and not doing anything else. Or only dealing with the 11 million people and not doing anything else. That would be piecemeal, where you only deal with some parts of the problem but not every part of the problem.
“But this is really a tactical issue: whether you do the comprehensive package of three or four bills or whether you do one big bill that encompasses all of this,” Rubio added. “At the end of the day, what really matters is whether it takes care of the problem.”
The principles outlined in the plan introduced on Monday include:
The first-term senator was responding to news reports that he and the former Florida governor are bumping heads on the immigration issue — especially after Bush wrote last week in The Wall Street Journal that any effort to address immigration on a piecemeal basis is “short-sighted and self-defeating.”
Rubio had been on record as arguing for a "piecemeal" approach — one in which different elements of broad immigration reform would be taken up as a series of bills, rather than one comprehensive piece of legislation.
Adding to the drama is that both Rubio and Bush are on the short list of GOP favorites for a presidential run in 2016.
Editor's Note: Get 'An American Son', Marco Rubio's Memoir for Only $2.95! Click Here!
But Rubio told Newsmax on Monday that the bipartisan immigration plan announced on Capitol Hill Monday is neither piecemeal nor based on amnesty. He was among the senators who introduced the plan — and many of his ideas to reform immigration that he has been discussing in recent weeks were included in it.
“I don’t think I’d ever call for a piecemeal approach,” Rubio said. “Immigration needs to be dealt with comprehensively. I just don’t know it should be dealt with in one comprehensive bill.
“I’ve always said that maybe the better way to do this is to file four or five separate bills," he explained. "For example, one bill that modernizes legal immigration, one bill that does enforcement, and one bill that deals with the 11 million people who are already here illegally.
“Piecemeal, in my mind, and what he was talking about was, only doing, for example, a high-tech bill and not addressing anything else. Or only doing an enforcement part of the bill and not doing anything else. Or only dealing with the 11 million people and not doing anything else. That would be piecemeal, where you only deal with some parts of the problem but not every part of the problem.
“But this is really a tactical issue: whether you do the comprehensive package of three or four bills or whether you do one big bill that encompasses all of this,” Rubio added. “At the end of the day, what really matters is whether it takes care of the problem.”
The principles outlined in the plan introduced on Monday include:
- Providing for stronger border security. “It’s critical that we get operational control of the border,” Rubio tells Newsmax.
- Strengthening workplace enforcement and the nation’s visa-tracking system. “For both the entry and the exits of visitor visas, because 40 percent of our undocumented immigrants entered the country illegally and overstayed their visas," Rubio says.
- Developing this system for those already in the country illegally for at least five years: Requiring extensive background checks; facing deportation if found to have a criminal history; paying all back taxes and fines; being ineligible for public assistance. “Then, they will be allowed to apply for the legal immigration system, meaning the green-card process,” he adds.
“We have to
have a legal immigration system that works. We have to modernize that system
that has to work for the 21st century,” Rubio tells Newsmax. “As a sovereign
country, we have a right to have immigration laws and we have a right to
enforce them.”
The plan introduced on Monday came under fire immediately by several Republicans and conservatives as an amnesty program.
That’s not the case, Rubio said.
“Amnesty is the forgiveness of something and nothing is being forgiven. If you violated the immigration laws of the United States, you’re going to pay a fine. You’re going to pay back taxes. You’re not going to qualify for any federal benefits. You’re going to have to wait in probationary status for a significant period of time — and then, after all of that, the only thing you get is the opportunity to apply for the same green-card process that anybody else would get.
“Amnesty, in my mind, is that we basically forgive what you’ve done wrong and let you start over,” Rubio added. “And that’s not the case here. All we’re giving people here is the opportunity to earn, through a series of steps and measures, the opportunity to file for a green card the way they should’ve done from the beginning.”
He also expects opposition from Democrats, as well as from members of his own party.
“There’s certainly going to be people that are going to oppose it, not just in the Republican Party. There may be some in the Democratic Party, because they think the pathway is too tough or the enforcement mechanisms are too difficult.
“What we have now are principles — principles that enjoy the support of the enormous majority of Americans in both parties,” Rubio added. “Now we have to come up with a law, and that law has details to it — and that’s where reasonable minds are going to disagree about whether something is adequate or not, and that work needs to be done.
Urgent: Should Women Be in Combat? Vote Here
“I can’t really expect for many of my colleagues to support something until they’ve seen the details of it. The details matter. One thing is that this law provides for enforcement, another thing is to see whether it really does or not. And that’s the work we’re going to have to do to get buy-ins.
“And, of course, this working group we put together, this bipartisan working group, all this group can do is be the starting point in this debate,” Rubio said. “There’s a lot of work yet to be done and a lot of details yet to be established.”
Also in his wide-ranging Newsmax interview, Rubio said that:
The plan introduced on Monday came under fire immediately by several Republicans and conservatives as an amnesty program.
That’s not the case, Rubio said.
“Amnesty is the forgiveness of something and nothing is being forgiven. If you violated the immigration laws of the United States, you’re going to pay a fine. You’re going to pay back taxes. You’re not going to qualify for any federal benefits. You’re going to have to wait in probationary status for a significant period of time — and then, after all of that, the only thing you get is the opportunity to apply for the same green-card process that anybody else would get.
“Amnesty, in my mind, is that we basically forgive what you’ve done wrong and let you start over,” Rubio added. “And that’s not the case here. All we’re giving people here is the opportunity to earn, through a series of steps and measures, the opportunity to file for a green card the way they should’ve done from the beginning.”
He also expects opposition from Democrats, as well as from members of his own party.
“There’s certainly going to be people that are going to oppose it, not just in the Republican Party. There may be some in the Democratic Party, because they think the pathway is too tough or the enforcement mechanisms are too difficult.
“What we have now are principles — principles that enjoy the support of the enormous majority of Americans in both parties,” Rubio added. “Now we have to come up with a law, and that law has details to it — and that’s where reasonable minds are going to disagree about whether something is adequate or not, and that work needs to be done.
Urgent: Should Women Be in Combat? Vote Here
“I can’t really expect for many of my colleagues to support something until they’ve seen the details of it. The details matter. One thing is that this law provides for enforcement, another thing is to see whether it really does or not. And that’s the work we’re going to have to do to get buy-ins.
“And, of course, this working group we put together, this bipartisan working group, all this group can do is be the starting point in this debate,” Rubio said. “There’s a lot of work yet to be done and a lot of details yet to be established.”
Also in his wide-ranging Newsmax interview, Rubio said that:
- While the announced program reflects some bipartisanship on Capitol Hill, “I would caution everyone from over-exuberance. There’s a lot of work to be done here, and there’s still a lot of points of contention in terms of what the details of the legislation should look like.”
- The Republican Party will attract more Hispanics by appealing to “our principles of free enterprise and limited government. We have a lot of work to do to explain to the American people, to a whole new generation of Americans, why limited government and free enterprise has made us exceptional and why big government will rob us of that.”
- He, himself, is focused on better serving his Florida constituents right now rather than eyeing a presidential run in 2016. “There’s some important issues we’re dealing with here. What I have learned is that if you do a good job at whatever your job is now, you always have opportunities to do different things later — and they may be things you never envisioned, perhaps things you never could’ve planned for.”
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/rubio-immigration-reform-piecemeal/2013/01/28/id/487777?s=al&promo_code=12377-1##ixzz2JMv46f3w
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
TOP TEN PREDICTIONS FOR 2013 Irmende MENDEZ
|
With all the problems the World is facing, it can
be unsettling to the mind. However, here are ten predictions that are true!
* 1. The Bible will still have all the answers. 2. Prayer will still be the most powerful force on Earth. 3. The Holy Spirit will still move. 4. God will still honor the praises of His people. 5. There will still be Biblical preaching. 6. There will still be singing of praise to God. 7. God will still pour out blessings upon His people. 8. There will still be room at the Cross. 9. Jesus will still love you. 10. Jesus will still save the lost when they come to Him. Isn't it great to remember Who Is Really In Control, and that; "The Word of the Lord endures forever." ( 1 Peter 1:25 ) We hope you find this encouraging and will send it to friends! Sometimes we need a reminder of just "WHO" really is in control!! 'Til the nets are full, keep |
Obama Attacks Fox; Find Out Which Host Fired Back Here
President Obama’s White House has a troubled history with conservative and/or right-leaning media, and has done pretty much since the president took office. The rancor on both sides is generally equivalent.Certainly, an equal amount of rancor was loosed this weekend from both sides, when President Obama criticized Republicans for being overly beholden to Fox News and radio host Rush Limbaugh, only to have one prominent Fox host fire back accusing him of thin skinned dishonesty.
First, there was President Obama’s comment itself, which he made in an interview with the liberal magazine The New Republic (emphasis added):
Well, look, I’ve always believed that there are a bunch of Republicans of goodwill who would rather get something done than suffer through the sort of nasty atmosphere that prevails in Washington right now. It’s not a fun time to be a member of Congress.
And I think if you talk privately to Democrats and Republicans, particularly those who have been around for a while, they long for the days when they could socialize and introduce bipartisan legislation and feel productive. So I don’t think the issue is whether or not there are people of goodwill in either party that want to get something done. I think what we really have to do is change some of the incentive structures so that people feel liberated to pursue some common ground.
One of the biggest factors is going to be how the media shapes debates. If a Republican member of Congress is not punished on Fox News or by Rush Limbaugh for working with a Democrat on a bill of common interest, then you’ll see more of them doing it.
Apparently President Obama wants his usual media pass and Fox challenges his policies – which happens to be the media’s job.[...]
And do you know what else? Brace yourself for this one! Some Democrats have told me that they want to come on Fox to discuss issues but they get heat from their Leadership for appearing on Fox. Does President Obama know that? So which Party is intimidating its members? And to say Senator Harry Reid is willing to compromise is just wrong. He has not allowed a budget to get to the Senate Floor for years to even begin a discussion. The budget process is where all compromise begins and ends and ended it before it even got started.
Secretary of State grade
inflation -- When Hillary Clinton testified in front of Congress last week
on the Benghazi terrorist attack, Democratic legislators insisted she would go
down as one of the great secretaries of state in American history. For what
reason, no one's exactly sure. TheDC's Jeff Poor reports:
"The case that Hillary Clinton has been a 'great' secretary of state is 'exceedingly weak,' argued Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume Sunday. According to Hume, the list of accomplishments her proponents use to tout her four years as America's top diplomat is nothing exceptional. 'I think those examples you cited would add up to a case for her competence,' Hume said on this weekend’s broadcast of 'Fox News Sunday,' responding to host Chris Wallace laying out a list of Clinton's alleged accomplishments. 'They do not add up to a case for greatness. After all, the groundwork on Burma had been done by the previous administration and the administration properly followed through on it. You look across the world now at the major issues. Are Arabs and Israelis closer to peace? How about Iran and North Korea and their nuclear programs --- have they been halted or seriously set back?'"
What, pray tell, has she really achieved? You've heard of grade inflation. Well, this is secretary of state inflation. Greatness requires great accomplishments, of which Hillary Clinton doesn't really have any at the State Department.
"The case that Hillary Clinton has been a 'great' secretary of state is 'exceedingly weak,' argued Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume Sunday. According to Hume, the list of accomplishments her proponents use to tout her four years as America's top diplomat is nothing exceptional. 'I think those examples you cited would add up to a case for her competence,' Hume said on this weekend’s broadcast of 'Fox News Sunday,' responding to host Chris Wallace laying out a list of Clinton's alleged accomplishments. 'They do not add up to a case for greatness. After all, the groundwork on Burma had been done by the previous administration and the administration properly followed through on it. You look across the world now at the major issues. Are Arabs and Israelis closer to peace? How about Iran and North Korea and their nuclear programs --- have they been halted or seriously set back?'"
What, pray tell, has she really achieved? You've heard of grade inflation. Well, this is secretary of state inflation. Greatness requires great accomplishments, of which Hillary Clinton doesn't really have any at the State Department.
Should Obama's Gun Ban Be Approved? Vote Here Now in Urgent Poll.
Kissinger: US on Brink of Nuclear Crisis with Iran
Sunday, 27 Jan 2013 06:35 PM
Former U.S.
Secretary of State and Nobel Peace laureate Henry Kissinger is warning that the
United States and Israel are very close to facing a crisis with a
nuclear-arming Iran.
The 89-year-old Kissinger told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that such a crisis — a full-fledged atomic war — would be "a turning point in human history," the BBC reported.
"There has emerged in the region, the current and most urgent issue of nuclear proliferation. For 15 years, the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council [UNSC] have declared that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, but it has been approaching," he said.
"In a few years, people will have to come to a determination of how to react, or the consequences of non-reaction.
"I believe this point will be reached in a very foreseeable future," he added.
Kissinger called for “serious” negotiations on both sides to avert the crisis. The most important thing, Kissinger said, was for the West to prevent letting things get so bad that Israel is forced to act alone.
"Unilateral intervention by Israel would be a desperate last resort, but the Iranians have to understand that if they keep using the negotiations to gain time to complete a nuclear programme then the situation will become extremely dangerous," he said.
If Tehran gets nuclear weapons, regimes across the Middle East and Africa will want them, too, Kissinger said.
"The danger is that we could be reaching a point where nuclear weapons would become almost conventional, and there will be the possibility of a nuclear conflict at some point... that would be a turning point in human history," he said.
"If Iran acts as a nation and not as a revolutionary cause, there is no reason for America or other permanent members of the UNSC [United Nations Security Council] to be in conflict with it, nor any countries in the region. On that basis I would hope that a negotiated solution would be found in a measurable time."
The 89-year-old Kissinger told the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that such a crisis — a full-fledged atomic war — would be "a turning point in human history," the BBC reported.
"There has emerged in the region, the current and most urgent issue of nuclear proliferation. For 15 years, the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council [UNSC] have declared that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable, but it has been approaching," he said.
"In a few years, people will have to come to a determination of how to react, or the consequences of non-reaction.
"I believe this point will be reached in a very foreseeable future," he added.
Kissinger called for “serious” negotiations on both sides to avert the crisis. The most important thing, Kissinger said, was for the West to prevent letting things get so bad that Israel is forced to act alone.
"Unilateral intervention by Israel would be a desperate last resort, but the Iranians have to understand that if they keep using the negotiations to gain time to complete a nuclear programme then the situation will become extremely dangerous," he said.
If Tehran gets nuclear weapons, regimes across the Middle East and Africa will want them, too, Kissinger said.
"The danger is that we could be reaching a point where nuclear weapons would become almost conventional, and there will be the possibility of a nuclear conflict at some point... that would be a turning point in human history," he said.
"If Iran acts as a nation and not as a revolutionary cause, there is no reason for America or other permanent members of the UNSC [United Nations Security Council] to be in conflict with it, nor any countries in the region. On that basis I would hope that a negotiated solution would be found in a measurable time."
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/kissinger-iran-nuclear-crisis/2013/01/27/id/487585?s=al&promo_code=12346-1##ixzz2JHz6emhA
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Comprehensive U.S. Immigration Plan Coming This Week -McCain
Sunday, 27
Jan 2013 03:34 PM
Leading
Democratic and Republican senators said on Sunday there were encouraging signs
in the push to overhaul U.S. immigration laws - a top priority for President
Obama's second term - and they would introduce their plan this week.
With Obama set to begin his
push for immigration reform with a speech in Las Vegas on Tuesday, a group of
three Democratic and three Republican senators have been working for weeks on a
plan.One of those senators, Republican John McCain of the border state of Arizona, said on ABC's "This Week" program that the group still had hard work ahead but that he was pleased with the progress and that the principles of a comprehensive plan would be put forth this week.
McCain said the plan was much like a 2007 immigration proposal that died during the presidency of George W. Bush. That plan included a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, tighter borders, a guest worker program and requirements for employers to verify workers' immigration status.
The immigration issue was largely pushed aside during Obama's first term as economic concerns weighed more heavily, but the president, who had overwhelming backing from Hispanic voters in his 2012 re-election, cited it as part of his agenda when sworn in for a second term last week.
McCain said the political aspect of immigration reform should sway any Republicans who object to a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
"We are losing dramatically the Hispanic vote, which we think should be ours, for a variety of reasons, and we've got to understand that," he said.
McCain said change also was needed because "we can't go on forever with 11 million people living in this country in the shadows in an illegal status. We cannot forever have children who were born here, who were brought here by their parents when they were small children, to live in the shadows, as well."
Democrat Dick Durbin of Illinois, another member of the six-person Senate group, said on "Fox News Sunday" that work remained to be done but that the progress was encouraging.
"We are trying work our way through some very difficult issues but we are committed to a comprehensive approach to finally in this country having an immigration law that we can live with," he said. "We have virtually been going for maybe 25 years without a clear statement about immigration policy. That's unacceptable in this nation of immigrants."
Senator Robert Menendez, a Democrat from New Jersey who is also a member of the immigration group, said on "This Week" that he was cautiously optimistic because of the bipartisan spirit that has prevailed in the recent reform effort.
"I see things that were once off the table for agreement and discussion being on the table with a serious pathway forward," he said.
Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, a Republican who is not a member of the group, said he had spoken with one of its members, who said he was "very optimistic" about reform.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/mccain-immigration-reform-hispanic/2013/01/27/id/487572?s=al&promo_code=12346-1##ixzz2JI1pYsX9
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
Posted on Fri, Jan. 25, 2013
’99-percenters’ not the problem in public pension costs
BY XAVIER SUAREZ
District7@miamidade.gov
District7@miamidade.gov
The national debate about the local and state public
sector rages on. Many on the Republican right engage in reflexive bashing of
the public-sector and its capacity to bargain collectively while the
traditional Democratic left has found political support (at the expense of
financial prudence) in embracing a public union-at-all-costs approach.
But there is a constructive middle ground when it comes to our
rank-and-file local and state public employees, the overwhelming majority of
whom work diligently and ethically in delivering critical services, maintaining
public safety, and protecting our physical environment, food, water and air. The concept of civil service is quite simple: the rank-and-file, or lower rungs in the employment ladder, are protected by rules that prevent changeovers with each new administration; conversely, the upper rungs in the ladder, occupied by management, are not protected. (They serve at the will of the elected officials or are hired by professional administrators as at-will employees.)
Now let’s talk about salaries and benefits.
Because pension benefits are typically tied to a percentage of the highest salary earned, there are managers who can retire at 50 or 55 years old with pensions in the six-figure range.
Obviously no system, private or public, can absorb such generous benefits. But it should be kept in mind, as we reform excesses in the bureaucracy, that the lower ranks of the civil service are filled with teachers, nurses and nurses’ assistants, rescue technicians, parks, transit, solid waste and public works employees and others whose salaries often never exceed $50,000 and whose pensions usually do not exceed one-third of that, or about $15,000/year even after 20 years of service.
These rank-and-file employees are already seeing their defined benefit plans cut to align more in market value to the defined contribution plans more common in the private sector.
Those are the “99 percenters,” and they are not the problem.
Miami-Dade County has a manager-to-employee ratio (called "span-of-control") of 1-5. This ratio is in stark contrast to the private sector, where a typical span-of-control ratio is eight to 10 employees for each supervisor.
One county department (Fire) has 2,000 employees, of whom almost 700 are supervisors and no fewer than 80 have the title of "chief" something-or-other.
We need to reduce their ranks to something manageable.
We might find that, in the process, the administration of an agency whose services have not changed substantially in half a century becomes much more efficient, as the number of supervisors is reduced and the number of field employees is increased.
In the debate about the public sector, we need to move beyond the outdated platitudes of the left and right, and do something that rarely occurs in the public discourse on this subject — differentiate.
Distinguish between the public sector equivalent of the middle class — the overwhelming majority of our public employees who are essential to the successful functioning of our local and state governments and who earn a fair wage, and those in the public sector who are underperformers or who add unnecessary layers of
management and often draw compensation (salaries and benefits combined) that exceed the compensation of their private sector counterparts.
And if we do that, we will have a lot more people and resources to fill the ever-growing number of potholes in our county.
Xavier L. Suarez is the Miami-Dade County commissioner representing District 7.
Sheriff To America: ‘Forget 911—Arm Yourselves Against Criminals!’
Due to budget cuts and lack of police officers on the streets, a Milwaukee sheriff is telling his constituents to forget about calling 911, and instead take a gun training course and arm themselves against criminals.
You are
here: Home / Commentary /
Clinton on Benghazi: ‘What Difference Does it Make?’—A lot, Madame Secretary
Clinton On Benghazi: ‘What Difference Does It Make?’—A Lot, Madame Secretary
What difference does it make?
Well, Madam Secretary – a big one.
When Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State, sat before the Senate Foreign Relation Committee hearing on the Benghazi attacks, her conviction on the matter was certainly not in question. The questions came hard and fast and her answers escalated in kind with frustration. Eerily similar to famous exchange at the climax of the movie A Few Good Men when the “You can’t handle the truth” line was delivered, when questioned repeatedly regarding the misinformation that was delivered to the public via both Susan Rice, ambassador to the UN and the White House, she finally delivered the soon-to-be-infamous line “What difference, at this point, does it make!”
I have no argument with the premise that emotionally charged and pointed questions with the goal of her to admit failure are pointless, but the difference that it makes is this: if during the execution and aftermath, the event was so blatantly blamed on inconclusive and arguably concocted evidence (i.e., a “protest turned violent over a YouTube video, instead of a coordinated terrorist attack) to the point the President actually took that defense to the UN himself —what is it that they were hiding? She’s right, Benghazi was a mess. She admitted and took responsibility for the security and adopted all twenty-nine measures recommended by the investigation, but the clover and clean up—that is the problem.
How is it that the same administration that had a play-by-play seat in the world’s most sophisticated war room during the Bin Laden raid couldn’t review simple surveillance camera feeds and figure out what happened weeks later? The White House made this Benghazi-gate, not the Republicans, by the way they handled it. The American people simply do not like being lied to—it is a matter of trust—and it’s a big one. This is notably not the first time Hillary Clinton has had to cover for a man in the White House who is not being truthful, and understandably, she’s getting a little tired of it. So are we, Madam Secretary—so are we.
"El
hombre es el unico animal que tropieza dos veces con la misma piedra"
Exactamente igual le esta pasando a la comision del Condado de Miami-Dade, aprobo un nuevo impuesto a los turistas para complacer la peticion del dueño del Estadio Sun Life por valor de $200 millones de dolares, igual que ocurrio hace mas de 3 años con el Estadio de los Marllins y el famoso Tunel Mutilado, y en definitiva son los contribuyentes los que pagan los impuestos y los que sufrimos las consecuencias, de los errores de algunos comisionados
Si la comision estudiara los resultados del Censo de poblacion y viviendas del 2010, se daria cuenta que tiene unos 450,000 personas pobres, viviendo muchos con sus familias agredos promiscuamente acinados en Albegues, o agregados en casa de familiares, otors muchos en las calles, comiendo de la limonsas de la caridad del gobierno, o de instituciones caritativas y unido a esta verguenza, el Condado mantiene a mas de 113,000 desempleados, sin esperanza de solucion a corto ni largo plazo
No quiero extenderme en explicaciones, pues todo esto esta argumentado en el articulo que les adjunto titulado ""Los errores de la comision del condado de Miami-Dade", ademas a modo de recordatoio les adjunto los articulos; "Los comisioados de Miami Dade"," El Orange Bowl derrivado antes de tiempo", "Ejl Orange Bowl", "El Sector de la economia que genera mas empleo" y "Las Viviendas Fantasmas"
Que felices y agradecidas se sentirian estas 1,667 familias, si con ese dinero hubiesen construido edificios prefabricados con apartamentos de bajo costo, las cuales, integracian el famoso Plan 8, pero siendo la incersion del Estado, en unos 20 años serian dueños de su casa, logrando el "Sueño de su vida" tener su hogar propio..
Es preferible como siempre señalo, fabricar nuevas comunidades, incluyendo los edificios, para brindar todos los servicios publicos y privados y de esta manera, despues de terminads las vivendas, puedan continuar trabajando como empleados, para atender a todos los pobladores de la nueva la comunidad.
Ing. Armando Lopez-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio.-Tf=786-295-2406l
Exactamente igual le esta pasando a la comision del Condado de Miami-Dade, aprobo un nuevo impuesto a los turistas para complacer la peticion del dueño del Estadio Sun Life por valor de $200 millones de dolares, igual que ocurrio hace mas de 3 años con el Estadio de los Marllins y el famoso Tunel Mutilado, y en definitiva son los contribuyentes los que pagan los impuestos y los que sufrimos las consecuencias, de los errores de algunos comisionados
Si la comision estudiara los resultados del Censo de poblacion y viviendas del 2010, se daria cuenta que tiene unos 450,000 personas pobres, viviendo muchos con sus familias agredos promiscuamente acinados en Albegues, o agregados en casa de familiares, otors muchos en las calles, comiendo de la limonsas de la caridad del gobierno, o de instituciones caritativas y unido a esta verguenza, el Condado mantiene a mas de 113,000 desempleados, sin esperanza de solucion a corto ni largo plazo
No quiero extenderme en explicaciones, pues todo esto esta argumentado en el articulo que les adjunto titulado ""Los errores de la comision del condado de Miami-Dade", ademas a modo de recordatoio les adjunto los articulos; "Los comisioados de Miami Dade"," El Orange Bowl derrivado antes de tiempo", "Ejl Orange Bowl", "El Sector de la economia que genera mas empleo" y "Las Viviendas Fantasmas"
Que felices y agradecidas se sentirian estas 1,667 familias, si con ese dinero hubiesen construido edificios prefabricados con apartamentos de bajo costo, las cuales, integracian el famoso Plan 8, pero siendo la incersion del Estado, en unos 20 años serian dueños de su casa, logrando el "Sueño de su vida" tener su hogar propio..
Es preferible como siempre señalo, fabricar nuevas comunidades, incluyendo los edificios, para brindar todos los servicios publicos y privados y de esta manera, despues de terminads las vivendas, puedan continuar trabajando como empleados, para atender a todos los pobladores de la nueva la comunidad.
Ing. Armando Lopez-Calleja.-Miembro del CNP de Cuba en el Exilio.-Tf=786-295-2406l
El Cielo es Real....revista Newsweek
|
Rusia alerta sobre un inminente ataque terrorista que ocurrirá en USA!!!
Another massacre prior to Pre Obama’s 12 February State of Union Address
|
January 26, 2013
Russia Issues “Critical Alert” For US As Billions Flee American Banks By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A sobering “Critical Alert” issued by the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MFA) this afternoon is warning
all Russian diplomatic personal and civilian workers currently residing in
the United States that an “imminent terror attack”should be
expected to occur during the next fortnight, up to and including 12 February.
The three-level alarm system of terrorism threats issued in this report was signed into law by President Putin this past June and includes: Blue Level for elevated alert, Yellow Level for high alert, and Red Level for critical alert. The MFA in issuing this extraordinary warning cites as one of its “sufficiently critical criteria” the mass withdrawal from the largest US banks this past week of $114.1 billion, the largest amount taken from these banks since the 11 September 2001 terror attacks, and which American financial experts have yet to explain because, in their words, they don’t why. Equally concerning the MFA, this report says, was Switzerland joining Germany, the Netherlands and Venezuela in demanding that their gold held in the vaults of the US Federal Reserve Bank in New York be repatriated, a move that has brought fear among many American financial experts as to its full implications. MFA strategic analysts contributing to this report state that these “massive financial moves” by Western elites signal their knowing of an impending crisis about to hit the United States similar to past “false flag attacks”intended to shift US policy, and laws, towards even greater totalitarian measures. One specific example citied in this report was the 28 February 1993 “false flag” event, now called the Waco Siege, which killed 4 US government agents and 82 men, women and children, and which led to the 13 September 1994 passage of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) that outlawed the American people from owning the types of armaments used in this state-sponsored massacre. [Note: This law expired in 2004] Important to note, this report says, and in using past US history as an example, Russian terror experts “fully expect” the Americans to conduct another such staged event/massacre prior to President Obama’s 12 February State of Union Address where he is expected to demand new gun laws to quickly disarm the citizens of his country, a move that has been cheered by the Communist Party USA. Not cheering the Obama regimes move to disarm citizens, however, are the gun owners of New York State who are now faced with some of the most draconian anti-gun laws in America, but who have vowed they will not comply in what is being dubbed as “the largest act of civil disobedience in State history.” Even more disturbing, local Sheriffs across the United States are not cheering either and are vowing not enforce what they call “unconstitutional gun laws.” The opposition of Americas Sheriffs to Obama’s gun-grab, this report continues, is significant as these law enforcement officers generally, but not always, are the highest law enforcement officer of a County with powers even exceeding those of US Federal government agents. Quick to react against these Sheriffs, this report says, Obama regime supporter, and Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, son of Vice President Joe Biden, this past week stripped all of the County Sheriffs in his State of their arrest powers rendering them unable to protect the citizens who elected them from harm. Not acting alone, either, this report continues, Attorney General Biden was joined this past week by US Attorney General Eric Holder who began the Obama regimes push against US citizens owning guns, and by Obama’s former Chief of Staff, and current Mayor of Chicago, Rahm Emanuel, who told Americas banks this past week to stop supporting gun makers. Where President Putin warned in 2009 that “one is sorely tempted to make simple and popular decisions in times of crisis” and continued by saying “we could face far greater complications if we merely treat the symptoms of the disease” and then adamantly warned the Obama regime of the dangers of socialism by stating “In the 20th century, the Soviet Union made the state's role absolute. In the long run, this made the Soviet economy totally uncompetitive. This lesson cost us dearly. I am sure nobody wants to see it repeated.”, his words have, apparently, fallen on deaf ears. To if the American people will continue to allow their once cherished rights to be continually destroyed for the benefit of their elite masters, while at the same time succumbing to any measure of manufactured fear the Obama, or any other, regime throws at them, it still remains unknown. What is known, however, is that the foe these American people find themselves pitted against is the most ruthless and murderous our planet Earth has ever known…over 150 million previously disarmed dead Russians, Chinese and German men, women and children over the past century can attest to that…so now it’s the United States turn to see who will ultimately win this tragic war against humanity. January 26, 2012 © EU and US all rights reserved. Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL. |
Participan
en “En mi opinión” Alberto L. Pérez “amenper”, Alexis Ortiz, Amb. Armando
Valladares, Annie González, Ing. Armando López Calleja, J. Fresno, Bárbara
Fernández, Carlos Bringuier, Efraín Sinaí, Eladio José Armesto, Enrique
Enríquez, Enrique de Diego, Erick Ruiz,
Emigdio Prado, Gerardo Alfredo DeSola, Georgina López, Gustavo Rojas, Héctor
Molina, Héctor Lemange Sando, Irmende Méndez, Jesús Angulo, Jesús Marzo
Fernández, Jorge A Villalon, Jorge Aguiar , José y Marcia Caula, J Fresno, Luis
Pensado, Lili Samways, Manny Fernández, Margarita Sánchez, María Argelia
Vizcaíno, May De La Vega, Mil amigos de Holguín, Miriam Pinedo, Miriam Dopico, Margarita
Sánchez, Marlene, Martha Ruiz, María
Lahullier, Olga Griñan, Oscar Díaz, Philip
V. Riggio, Raúl
Barroso, Reinaldo López jr, Ricardo
Samitier, Rolando Antonio Lara, Sergio Bello, Sofía Iduate, Sonia “Chuchin”
Castell, Tony Flores, V J Marino, William Benard, Victor M Caamaño, http://news.yahoo.com,
NoticieroDigital.com , CNN Español, LaNuevaNacion.com, TheBLAZE.com, The
WesternCenterforJournalism.com, LastResistance.com, NewsMax.com, RealClearPolitics.com, GOPUSA.com, LIGNET.com, TheTradingReport.com, Beforeit’sNews.com,
Editor Lázaro R González Miño
MrLazaroRGonzalez.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment