No 598 “En mi opinión” Febrero 19, 2014

“IN GOD WE TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor

-IN CASE OF GOVERNMENT TYRANY-

“USE THE SECOND AMENDMENT”

President Barack Obama has elevated the right to have sex with a member of the same sex to the level of universal “fundamental freedoms”

In a new presidential statement criticizing Uganda. But critics say his promotion of homosexuality in a continent that overwhelmingly opposes that behavior amounts to a form of liberal “cultural imperialism.”

Obama wrote on Sunday that he opposed a proposed bill in Uganda that would criminalize same-sex “marriages” and impose life imprisonment for repeated homosexual acts, among other provisions, because “as a country and a people, the United States has consistently stood for the protection of fundamental freedoms and universal human rights.”

Obama said the bill represents “a serious setback for all those around the world who share a commitment to freedom, justice, and equal rights.”

He added that he had “conveyed” the message that “enacting this legislation will complicate our valued relationship with Uganda.”

His reaction came after Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni said last Friday that, after nearly two months deliberation, he would sign legislation that makes conducting a same-sex “wedding” punishable with seven years in prison. Infecting others with AIDS, having sex with minors, or repeated homosexual acts may earn life imprisonment. An earlier version of the bill called for the death penalty, but the provision was removed.

Read More: http://www.lifesitenews.com

El presidente de EE UU, Barack Obama, durante su discurso sobre economía y Medio Ambiente. / MARK WILSON (AFP)

El presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, ha ordenado a la Agencia de Medio Ambiente (EPA, en sus siglas en inglés) que ponga en marcha nuevas medidas para la reducción de las emisiones de gas de efecto invernadero en los vehículos pesados y semipesados del país. Con el anuncio que ha hecho este martes en un centro de distribución en Maryland de una cadena de supermercados, el mandatario reafirma su intención de cumplir con su agenda sobre lucha contra el cambio climático al margen de un Congreso dividido y opuesto, en gran medida, a disposiciones relacionadas con el medio ambiente.

“Hemos puesto en marcha la primera política a nivel nacional dirigida a incrementar el ahorro en el consumo de gasolina y a reducir la contaminación por CO2”, ha señalado Obama. El presidente ha presentado su nueva apuesta no sólo como un beneficio para el Medio Ambiente sino como una pieza clave para el crecimiento económico del país. “Desde que pusimos en adoptamos estas medidas y ayudamos al sector del automóvil a readaptarse, hemos creado alrededor de 425.000 nuevos puestos de trabajo”, ha asegurado Obama.

Las emisiones de CO2 de los medios de transporte son la segunda fuente de contaminación por gases de efecto invernadero en EE UU (aglutina el 28% de toda la polución del país, según la EPA), tras el sector eléctrico. Las nuevas normas sobre vehículos pesados entrarán en vigor en marzo de 2016 y se sumarán a una primera tanda que ya se hizo efectiva en 2011 para los automóviles de gran tonelaje fabricados entre 2014 y 2018 y que, según la Administración, permitirá reducir la polución por carbono en 270 millones de toneladas métricas. El Partido Republicano y el sector del transporte siempre se han mostrado contrarios a este tipo de disposiciones

El presidente ha adoptado esta nueva medida a través de una orden ejecutiva, una facultad que le permite eludir al Congreso y sortear la oposición republicana, y que ha venido empleando en materia de medio ambiente desde que está en la Casa Blanca. Las medidas avanzadas este martes ponen el colofón a una semana marcada por anuncios en materia medioambiental de la Administración Obama.

El viernes en California, Obama anunció que en su presupuesto había incluido una partida de 1.000 millones de dólares para ayudar a las comunidades a adaptarse a los efectos derivados del cambio climático. El fin de semana, el secretario de Estado, John Kerry, de visita en Indonesia, pidió a su Gobierno que se uniera al acuerdo para reducir las emisiones de CO2 al que se comprometieron los presidentes de EE UU y de China durante la cumbre que mantuvieron el año pasado en el Rancho Mirage, también en California.

El presidente, sin embargo, no puede eludir al Congreso en todas sus medidas referentes al Medio Ambiente. Obama ha instado este martes a los legisladores que eliminen las exenciones fiscales a la industria del gas y del petróleo y que parte de los 4.000 millones anuales que se recortan por esta partida pasen a un fondo para incentivar la investigación en tecnología para desarrollar vehículos híbridos y eléctricos, una petición que ya ha hecho en otras ocasiones y que no tiene visos de prosperar en un Capitolio dividido y pendiente de las elecciones legislativas.

FACT SHEET: Opportunity For All: Improving the Fuel Efficiency of American Trucks – Bolstering Energy Security, Cutting Carbon Pollution, Saving Money and Supporting Manufacturing Innovation

Year of Action: Making Progress Through Executive Action

In his State of the Union address, the President outlined a comprehensive agenda to make America a magnet for middle class jobs and business investment. The President highlighted the autoworker, who, implementing the Administration’s historic fuel economy standards, “fine-tuned some of the best, most fuel-efficient cars in the world, and did his part to help America wean itself off foreign oil.” And the President pledged, “in the coming months” to “build on that success by setting new standards for our trucks, so we can keep driving down oil imports and what we pay at the pump.” The President also called on Congress to do its part “by putting people to work building fueling stations that shift more cars and trucks from foreign oil to American natural gas.” Today, the President laid out additional details for his plan to improve the fuel efficiency of American trucks – bolstering energy security, cutting carbon pollution, and spurring manufacturing innovation.

· Directing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) to Set the Next Round of Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Today, the President is directing the EPA and the DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop and issue the next phase of medium- and heavy-duty vehicle fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas standards by March 2016. Under this timeline, the agencies are expected to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) by March 2015. This second round of fuel efficiency standards will build on the first-ever standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (model years 2014 through 2018), which were proposed and finalized by this Administration and will save vehicle owners and operators an estimated $50 billion in fuel costs and save a projected 530 million barrels of oil.

· Partnering with Private-Sector Leaders to Deploy Advanced Vehicles. In addition, the President highlighted the success of the National Clean Fleets Partnership that he launched to speed the deployment of clean, energy-efficient vehicles and the infrastructure to support their use. This public- private partnership helps the nation’s largest fleet operators reduce diesel and gasoline use in their fleets by incorporating alternative fuels, electric vehicles and fuel-saving measures. To date, 23 major national companies, such as ARAMARK, Coca-Cola, Staples, UPS, AT&T, Enterprise Holdings, and Waste Management have joined the National Clean Fleets Partnership. Collectively, the National Clean Fleets Partners operate more than one million commercial vehicles nationwide. The President has directed his Department of Energy to provide each company that wants to partner with specialized resources, technical expertise and support in developing a comprehensive strategy to reduce fuel use and achieve greater efficiency and cost savings.

· Expanding Fuel Choices for American Drivers. In addition to taking executive action to make America more energy independent and cut carbon pollution, the President is also renewing his call for Congress to end subsidies to oil and gas companies and create an Energy Security Trust Fund to fund research and development for advanced vehicle technologies. And he is proposing to support investment in advanced vehicles and infrastructure through a new tax credit and an extension of tax credits to support cellulosic biofuels.

Further Detail on how the President will Continue to Work with Congress to Improve the Fuel Economy of American Trucks – Bolstering Energy Security, Cutting Carbon Pollution, and Spurring Manufacturing Innovation

· Directing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) to Set the Next Round of Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Today, the President is directing the EPA and the DOT’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to develop and issue the next phase of medium- and heavy-duty vehicle fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas (GHG) standards by March 2016. Under this timeline, the agencies are expected to issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) by March 2015. This second round of fuel efficiency standards will build on the first-ever standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles (model years 2014 through 2018), and will reach well into the next decade, just like the President’s successful national car standards.

Increasing the efficiency of medium-and heavy-duty vehicles (below referred to simply as heavy-duty vehicles) is a key component of the President’s Climate Action Plan to reduce carbon emissions. Heavy-duty vehicles represent a major opportunity to cut transportation oil use and carbon pollution. In 2010, heavy-duty vehicles represented just four percent of registered vehicles on the road in the United States, but they accounted for approximately 25 percent of on-road fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions in the transportation sector. They are currently the second-largest source of greenhouse gas emissions within the transportation sector (passenger cars and light trucks are the largest source). The first round of standards for medium- and heavy-duty vehicles, finalized in September 2011, is projected to save 530 million barrels of oil and reduce GHG emissions by approximately 270 million metric tons, saving vehicle owners and operators an estimated $50 billion in fuel costs over the lifetimes of the vehicles covered. For example, an operator of a new 2018 semi truck could pay for the technology upgrades in under a year and realize a net savings of $73,000 through reduced fuel costs over the truck’s useful life.

· Partnering with Manufacturers, Labor, States, NGOs, and other Stakeholders. To develop standards that provide long-term certainty and promote innovation, EPA and NHTSA will work closely with stakeholders, both large and small, to explore further opportunities for fuel consumption and emissions reductions beyond the model year 2018 timeframe. EPA and NHTSA will also work closely with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) with the goal of ensuring that the next phase of standards allow manufacturers to continue to build a single national fleet.

· Supporting Adoption of New Fuel Efficient Technologies. The second round of fuel efficiency standards will spur manufacturing innovation and lead to the adoption of new fuel-efficient technologies on trucks and semi-trailers. In developing the standards, EPA and NHTSA will assess advanced technologies that may not currently be in production, and will consider, for example:

· Engine and powertrain efficiency improvements

· Aerodynamics

· Weight reduction

· Improved tire rolling resistance

· Hybridization

· Automatic engine shutdown

· Accessory improvements (water pumps, fans, auxiliary power units, air conditioning, etc.).

The President has directed his Department of Energy, working with EPA’s complementary SmartWay Transport Partnership, to provide each company that wants to partner with specialized resources, technical expertise and support in developing a comprehensive strategy to reduce fuel use and achieve greater efficiency and cost savings. Working with the Administration, the private sector partners that have joined the National Clean Fleets Partnership and the SmartWay Transport Partnership are seeing why deploying advanced vehicles is a win-win for them; for example:

· Last year, AT&T achieved a significant milestone with the delivery of its 7,500th alternative fuel vehicle (AFV). AT&T has committed to deploying around 15,000 AFVs over a 10-year period through 2018. AT&T's AFV fleet includes compressed natural gas, hybrid electric, all-electric, and extended-range electric vehicles. AT&T's deployment of alternative fuel vehicles enabled the company to avoid the purchase of 7.7 million gallons of gasoline from the beginning of the program through the end of 2012. And over the 10-year deployment period these AFV’s will save 49 million gallons of gasoline and reduce carbon emissions by 211,000 metric tons.

· Enterprise kicked off a program to make plug-in electric and hybrid cars available to rental customers in major US markets. Four cities have been announced to date (Orlando, San Francisco, Seattle, and Portland). In addition, more than 80 % of their 500 airport shuttle buses now operate on biodiesel or compressed natural gas. Enterprise’s fleet is not only the world’s largest, it’s also one of the most fuel efficient. Approximately 57.3 percent of their vehicles average a highway fuel efficiency rating of at least 28 mpg, and 28 percent of their vehicles average 32 mpg or better.

· Con-Way, a 2013 SmartWay Excellence Award winner, has equipped 100% of its tractors with SmartWay-certified fuel-savings and emissions-reduction technologies, and nearly half its trailers with fuel-saving aerodynamic features. The company’s tractors also have automatic idle shutdown, and the company has equipped its tractors and trailers with low- rolling resistance tires to increase miles per gallon and lower carbon emissions.

· Partnering with Manufacturers to Support Innovation for the Next Generation of Trucks. Class 8 combination trucks – commonly known as 18-wheelers – serve as the backbone of our domestic freight transportation – hauling about 70 percent of all freight tonnage and over 70 percent of the value of all goods shipped. The Administration’s SuperTruck program, launched in 2010 and funded by the Recovery Act and subsequent annual appropriations, is focused on demonstrating that, by 2015, the freight hauling efficiency of heavy-duty Class 8 trucks can be improved by 50 percent.

Through the program, the Department of Energy has partnered with four major engine and truck manufacturers – including Cummins, Volvo, Navistar and Daimler Truck North America – to increase engine efficiency and overall fuel economy from about 6.5 miles per gallon to about 9.75 miles per gallon. Class 8 vehicles have a total weight (including freight) of 33,000-80,000 lbs. and sometimes more; so every mile per gallon gained in fuel economy is worth thousands of dollars in fuel cost savings per truck per year. Since 2010, SuperTruck partners Cummins and PACCAR’s Peterbilt Motors Company have demonstrated a 20 percent increase in engine efficiency and a 70 percent increase in freight efficiency, reaching over 10 miles per gallon under real world driving conditions on a Class 8 tractor-trailer. Cummins is now working toward developing technologies to achieve even higher engine efficiency. The other three partner teams are also on their way to achieving a 50 percent fuel economy increase—leveraging a range of aerodynamics and engine efficiency technologies, including waste heat recovery technologies. Daimler Trucks of North America has demonstrated 50% engine efficiency and halfway through their project, Volvo has already demonstrated 48% engine efficiency.

· Expanding Fuel Choices for American Drivers. While the United States will continue to rely on responsibly produced oil and natural gas, President Obama is committed to a long-term policy that allows us to transition to cleaner energy sources.

· Establishing an Energy Security Trust Fund to Fund R&D for Advanced Vehicle Technologies. In addition to urging Congress to repeal the $4 billion in subsidies that taxpayers provide the oil and gas industry each year, the President has called on Congress to establish an Energy Security Trust and enact reforms to promote diligent oil and gas development on federal lands. The Energy Security Trust proposal has broad bipartisan support, including retired admirals, generals and leading CEOs, and focuses on shifting our cars and trucks off oil. This $2 billion investment in a range of cost-effective technologies – like advanced vehicles that run on electricity, homegrown biofuels, hydrogen, and domestically produced natural gas – will be drawn from revenues generated from federal oil and gas development. Establishing a dedicated source of funding will allow the Energy Department to maintain targeted and sustained investments that are catalytic and directly advance U.S. energy security.

· Supporting Investment in Advanced Vehicles and Infrastructure through a New Tax Credit and an Extension of Tax Credits to Support Cellulosic Biofuels. The President is announcing $200 million in a new tax credit to catalyze investment in the necessary infrastructure to support deployment of advanced vehicles at critical mass. This proposal would be fuel neutral, allowing the private sector to determine if biofuels, electrification, natural gas, hydrogen, or other alternative fuels would be the best fit in different communities. In addition, the President is proposing to extend the cellulosic biofuel producer credit that expired on December 31, 2013. Cellulosic biofuels have the potential to reduce petroleum consumption and carbon pollution while boosting rural economic development. Extending the existing tax credit would accelerate development of this transformative transportation fuel.

Report: Improving the Fuel Efficiency of American Trucks - February 2014

Ted Cruz Calls Out the RINO's. By Onan Coca /

Ted Cruz lays some truth down on Mark Levin about his fellow Senate Republicans. “In the 13 months I’ve been in the Senate, it has become apparent to me the single thing that Republican politicians hate and fear the most, and that is when they’re forced to tell the truth. It makes their heads explode.”

Democrats and liberals in the media often point to the way GOP establishment RINO’s (I’m looking at you, Peter King) curse the name of Ted Cruz as their evidence that the GOP is at war with itself.

Recently Ann-Marie Murrell of Politichicks interviewed Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) that spoke to this fight.

A-M: Many of your colleagues seem to be terrified to do the right thing, to fight for our conservative principles. How can this change, and do you think it ever will?

Rep. Gohmert: We have to assure members of Congress that are more worried about getting reelected–which has been drilled into them–that you can stand up and do the right thing and still raise money, still have a conservative PAC like mine that will help you raise money, will help you fight the battle and it makes it easier to stand up for what’s right.

In my first week going through orientation before I was actually sworn in to Congress, my fellow freshmen were told repeatedly was the most important thing you can do for your country is get reelected. Well I didn’t believe that then, and I don’t believe it now, but it’s been instilled in so many people on both sides of the aisle. Sometimes you just have to take a stand and say things that may not initially be popular, but you’ve still got to do it. But in the meantime, we’ve got to grow the number of people that are willing to stand up for what’s right at any cost–and it helps when they can be encouraged that there are people who will financially stand with them.

A-M: It sounds like you’re describing our fellow Texan Senator Ted Cruz. He was beaten and bashed like a piñata after he stood up for us.

Rep. Gohmert: (laughs) I was thrilled when Ted came into the Senate, that’s why I stayed up with him all night in his filibuster. We talk time to time and try to strategize between the House and Senate, so I’ve been absolutely thrilled that Ted has stood strong despite the slings and arrows that sometimes come when you do the right thing.

A-M: I interviewed Sen. Cruz soon after his filibuster and asked if he had been shocked at the backlash. He said yes, and that he understood why so few politicians are willing to swim against the tide. You’re one of those rare politicians unafraid to speak out, too. What do you and Ted Cruz, Mike Lee seem to have so much more courage than others?

Rep. Gohmert: Well, it comes from having your feet firmly implanted on the foundation and I know all three of us have a firm belief in God and when you know that there is eternal truth, you know what C.S. Lewis realized after having been an atheist, that there must be an absolute standard of right and wrong, justice and injustice, and if there weren’t then we could never know that there was justice and injustice. Once you know that, then you know that you are standing for more than just a temporary gain or loss; you’re standing for truth that will be there when time on this earth runs out.

My late mother did a powerful job; she was a brilliant woman but she used to embarrass me and my other siblings when she was at a church or town meeting–up she would stand, to make a point or take somebody on and I’d say ‘Mother, please sit down, you’re embarrassing me!’ and now I’ve pretty much turned into my mother (laughs). But right is right, wrong is wrong.

There is a lot of tension in our party right now, mostly brought on by RINO willingness to partner with Democrats on making our economic propositions even worse. (As well as by the tone and tenor the RINO caucus has been using to speak to and about conservatives.)

But I’d caution both the liberal and the RINO to be very careful on how they handle the conservatives in Congress.

Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul, Justin Amash, Thomas Massie and a growing crop of other conservatives are not afraid to take consistent stands for their values instead of bending for their popularity. It’s why these conservatives have become rock stars for the grassroots movement among conservatives all over the country. We know that Cruz, Lee and Paul aren’t grandstanding for power, wealth or fame… because there are easier ways to do it. If they would just compromise they could more easily gain positions of power and influence.

Take Justin Amash and Tim Huelskamp for example. A couple of years ago both men were stripped of their seats on the budget committee because the GOP leadership didn’t like how often they refused to bend to the leadership’s will.

While they may have lost their committee seats, both men gained a lot of credibility with grassroots conservatives. It’s that credibility that the RINO leadership needs to be concerned about, because when push comes to shove and the conservatives are forced to stand against EVERYONE else… we will stand with them. If the GOP wants to keep our votes and dollars flowing, they better pick the right side – it’s either the RINO’s or us.

Ricardo Samitier:

Policía Retirado De Miami Es Amenazado Con Arresto

Por Estar PRIVADAMENTE Investigando El Tiroteo En

La Escuela De Sandy Hook...

Ya pasamos la PRIMERA ETAPA del estado policial.

Estamos ahora entrando en la siguiente fase.

El Terror Policía: donde no hay opiniones... ni derechos

que no sean los AUTORIZADOS por la opinión oficial...

¿NO LO CREEN? Aquí tienen la noticia...

http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/01/25/retired-cop-and-educator-threatened-for-questioning-sandy-hook-investigation/

EN FRANCIA:

70% de los hogares tienen Internet

56% han hecho compras por Internet

5% de los hogares, sin padres, criados por tios o abuelos

72% de los trabajadores tiempo parcial son mujeres

1,2% de las viviendas no tienen agua caliente.

12% de las viviendas, tienen goteras en el techo o ventanas rotas.

9,1% de la superficie son carreteras o parkings

9% de la población =75 años

24,6% tiene = 20 años

Edad promedio 40,8 anyos

Personas de mas de 100 anyos un aumento anual de 8%

Producción de vino 19% menos que hace 40 años! Hasta la producción del vino bajo en Socialismo

Funcionarios del estado son 77 / 1000 y suman 5,4 millones.Uno por cada 12 personas

Desempleo oficial 3,3 millones

El estado controla 1,383 empresas, de esas las 3 más grandes son, el correo, los trenes y la electricidad

EN CALIFORNIA:

La Asamblea Estatal De California Declaró Las

“Divisas Electrónicas” Legales, POR UNANIMIDAD!

Se Espera, Que El Senado, También Lo Apruebe.

Si el gobernador lo firma, se hace ley, dentro de California. Eso indica,

que los millonarios de Silicón Valley, están detrás de Bitcoin...

Todos esos millonarios, están financiados por los banqueros...

Por Eso, Solo Podemos Confiar En Oro, Plata YLAS ARMAS.

http://abnk.assembly.ca.gov/sites/abnk.assembly.ca.gov/files/AB_129_0_ABPCA_CX27_Dickinson_RN_SN_20140107_FAROUKMA_20140121_FN_R092121.pdf

EN USA. PORQUE LOS CIUDADANOS NO AYUDAN.

Esto es lo que le paso a uno que quiso ayudar...

Un recuento que pasa todos los días en los 50 estados…

https://medium.com/p/9f53ef6a1c10

¿Los medicamentos, realmente expiran?

(Saquen ustedes sus propias conclusiones) Referencia:

http://www.health.harvard.edu/fhg/updates

por Richard Altschuler.

Tiene alguna validez la fecha de vencimiento que figura en los medicamentos? Si por ejemplo en un frasco de Tylenol dice “ NO USAR DESPUES DE JUNIO 1998” y estamos en agosto del 2002, se podría tomar el medicamento? Lo deberíamos eliminar? Me va a hacer daño si lo tomo? o simplemente ya perdió su efecto y no va servirme de nada?

En otras palabras, son los Laboratorios lo suficientemente honestos con nosotros poniendo una fecha de vencimiento o es un truco para eliminar el medicamento “vencido” que aun cumple su función y comprar uno nuevo?

Hay serias dudas que he investigado, después que mi suegra me dijera “no significa nada la fecha de vencimiento” al ver que ella estaba tomando Tylenol que tenía una fecha de vencimiento de más de cuatro años. Me burlé de ella sintiéndome superior, pero igual se lo tomó,y tuve que admitir su terquedad y su sabiduría en asuntos de salud.

Le di un vaso de agua y se tomó dos cápsulas del supuesto “veneno” para el dolor de espalda, y media hora después el dolor había desaparecido. No queriendo quedarme callado dándole la razón le dije que podía ser el efecto placebo. Me alegré que le pasara el dolor aun antes de tomar algunos cocteles y meterse en una tina de agua caliente. Todo esto sucedió en Laguna Beach, California.

De regreso a Nueva York, me sumergí en una investigación de la literatura médica y base de datos médicos, para encontrar la respuesta sobre la fecha de vencimiento y antes que pudiera decir “engañados nuevamente por lo laboratorios”, ya tenía la respuesta y aquí les presento algunos hechos:

Primero, la fecha de vencimiento requerida por ley en USA comenzó en 1979, especificando solo la fecha de manufactura, garantizando la seguridad del efecto del medicamento, sin que esto significara, por cuanto tiempo la droga era “buena” para su uso.

Segundo, autoridades médicas dijeron que era seguro usar los medicamentos, después de su fecha de vencimiento, sin tener en cuenta el significado que pudiera ser el de “vencidas”. Tampoco se advirtió que pudieran hacer daño o por último producir la muerte.

Estudios muestran que los medicamentos pueden perder su potencia con el tiempo,entre 5% o menos, como mínimo, hasta 50% o más(menos potencia cuanto más tarde). Aun 10 años después de la “fecha de vencimiento”, la mayoría de medicamentos conservan su potencia original. Es sabio pensar que si la vida depende de la potencia 100% de la droga y ha expirado,será mejor, conseguir una nueva, pero si lo que se padece es un dolor de cabeza, un resfrío o un cólico menstrual , tome el medicamento expirado y vea que pasa.

Uno de los más grandes estudios que se han hecho al respecto, lo hizo el Ejercito de EEUU hace 15 años, reportado por Laurie Cohen (Wall Street Journal 29 marzo 2000). Se recolectó medicamentos por un valor de un mil millones de dólares y se fueron probando medicamentos vencidos. LaAgencia de Medicamentos y Alimentos (FDA) condujo el estudio de más de 100 Medicamentos diferentes con receta o sin ella y los resultados mostraron que “MAS DEL 90% DE LOS MEDICAMENTOS SON SEGUROS Y EFECTIVOS HASTA 15 AÑOS MAS ALLA DE SU FECHA DE VENCIMIENTO”

A la luz de estos resultados, el director del programa Francis Flaherty, concluyó que la fecha puesta por los fabricantes no tiene sustento para decir si el medicamento no puede ser usado después de la fecha de vencimiento. Flaherty dice que la obligación de los fabricantes está, en decir que el medicamento funciona, independientemente de la fecha de vencimiento que escojan.

La fecha de vencimiento no significa y ni siquiera sugiere que el medicamento dejará de ser efectivo después de ésta, ni tampoco que hará daño. También afirma que los fabricantes ponen la fecha de vencimiento por razones de mercadeo, y no por razones científicas.

Flaherty fue farmacéutico de la FDA hasta 1999, que se retiró. “No es rentable tener medicamentos por más de 10 años, en las repisas de las farmacias, hay que renovarlos”.

La FDA advierte que no hay evidencias suficientes del estudio, que medicamentos evaluados en combate, para concluir que las mayorías de los medicamento conserven su potencia después de la fecha de vencimiento. Joel Davis (ex jefe de la sección de vencimiento de medicamentos de la FDA) sin embargo dice que con algunas excepciones (nitroglicerina, insulina y algunos antibióticos en forma líquida) la mayoría de medicamentos dura tanto como fue probado por el estudio del ejército de los EEU. Dice “que la mayoría de medicamentos se degradan muy despacio”, agrega “es posible tomar un medicamento que está guardado en casa, por años”. En el caso de la Aspirina, BAYER AG pone de 2 a 3 años como fecha de vencimiento, para ser eliminada, sin embargo Chris Allen vice presidente de la unidad de Aspirina de BAYER, dice que la fecha de vencimiento es un “poco conservadora”. Cuando BAYER probó Aspirina que tenía 4 años, tenía el 100% de su efectividad. La Compañía permanentemente mejora los envoltorios de la Aspirina, y cada cambio, implica pruebas para prolongar fecha de vencimiento. BAYER nunca ha probado la Aspirina después de más de cuatro años. El doctor Jean Carstensen, profesor emérito de la Escuela de Farmacia de la Universidad de Wisconsin ha estudiado la Aspirina después de 5 años, y afirma que si la Aspirina está bien hecha, es muy estable.

Bueno, lo acepto, mi suegra tenía razón y yo estaba equivocado, mis disculpas.

Ahora pienso que usaré ALKA SELTZER cuando me sienta mal, que tengo guardadas hace 10 años. Cuando millones de dólares en medicamentos “vencidos” se echaran a la basura todos los años.

ADIOS, JACKASS: Remington Arms Moves 1000s of Jobs Away From NY/CUOMO. By Clash Daily /

Remington Arms has announced an expansion plan into Alabama that will create 2,000 jobs in the state, while simultaneously reducing the workforce in their current Ilion, NY home, and Governor Cuomo’s SAFE Actwas a catalyst in making it happen.

This past summer, reports started surfacing that Remington Arms was scouting for new locations for their largest manufacturing plant. The new plant would bring with it over 2,000 jobs and $87 million in initial economic impact.

Via Yellowhammer:

High level sources have informed Yellowhammer News that Remington, one of the world’s largest gun manufacturers, will on Monday join Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley in announcing that they are bringing over 2,000 jobs to Alabama.

The company is viewing the move into Alabama as an expansion, but it will likely impact their Ilion, NY plant as well. The New York facility currently employees around 1,200 people. It is expected to stay open, but with a reduced workforce.

“The company is making the move as an expansion of capacity, production and research,” a source told Yellowhammer on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. “The demand for Remington products has skyrocketed recently, for obvious reasons, so they need to increase their production capacity. They will be expanding their research capabilities with the Alabama plant, too.”

The initial estimated impact on Alabama’s economy will be roughly $87 million.

The report states that Remington began its review of new locations after passage of the SAFE Act which banned magazines containing more than seven rounds, and reclassified the Bushmaster – a Remington product – as an “assault weapon.”

Amenper: Satanás Y Lucifer

Bueno, yo iba a ir a ver la película Son of God,(Hijo de Dios), pero ahora no sé si me siento con deseos de ir.

Han sacado a Satanás de la película, y no es que yo sea devoto de Satanás, pero sin lugar a dudas es una figura que tuvo que ver con la estancia de Cristo entre nosotros, sobre todo cuando estaba ayunando en el desierto. Para que la película de la vida de Cristo sea fiel a la realidad, tiene que estar Satanás en ella.

Resulta que han sacado a Satanás de la película porque dicen que era ofensivo porque el artista se parece a Obama.

La corrección política y la sensibilidad de Obama es algo que repugna, nunca había visto a un mulatico tan frágil y eso que conocí en mi pueblo a un mariconcito mulatico que le decían "Isabelita" que era delicadamente frágil, pero Obama es todavía más frágil que "Isabelita", no se puede tocar ni con el pétalo de una rosa. Se molesta hasta del sonido del vuelo de una mariposa.

Realmente no creo que se parezca tanto el artista a Obama, ni siquiera en el color, el mulato de Obama es más rojizo que el mulato más opaco deMohamen Mehdi Ouazanni, que es el artista que have der de Satanás, y las facciones son también diferentes. Quizás si en vez que quitarle el trabajo al pobre Mohamen le hubieran cambiado el nombre a Lucifer que tiene nombre de ángel, y cómo la mayor parte de estos liberales no saben la diferencia quizás lo hubieran aceptado.

Sería más correcto el ángel que se convirtió en el diablo que insinuar que Obama es un diablo que se hace pasar por un ángel.

Yo creo que Obama se parece más a Satanás por su conducta que por el parecido al artista, y eso no se puede remediar con quitarle el trabajo a Mohamen que quedó cesante y ahora con el asunto del desempleo se va a tener que ir al infierno.(esto me hubiera salido mejor en inglés por eso de "go to hell" pero ya estoy por la mitad y no voy a cambiar de idioma)

De todos modos todavía podemos ver a Obama-Satán en los episodios de la Biblia que ponen en la televisión, al no ser que los censuren también.

Hay un dicho que dice que el arte representa a la realidad, y en este caso creo que es adecuado, así que no debieran tener el derecho a interferir con el arte porque no les guste la realidad.

Bueno después de todo aunque interfieran con el arte no pueden interferir con la realidad y no pueden negar que el tipo es del diablo.

Amenper: Como muchas veces en mi vida he sido tildado de fascista porque no soy comunista, les estoy enviando este artículo de Hispanic LA una revista on line con las que no simpatizo por sus complejos hispánicos y sus tendencias izquierdistas, pero que publicaron este ensayo sobre la similitud del comunismo y el fascismo que considero muy apropiado en los tiempos que vivimos en que cada día comparan a los que se oponen al socialismo como fascistas. No dice quien es el autor, pero tiene que ser un colaborador cubano por el conocimiento que expresa sobre el comunismo en Cuba.

Comunismo y fascismo, el mismo perro con diferente bota.

Es demasiado obvio que el socialismo marxista (comunismo) y el fascismo se parecen entre sí como dos gotas de agua fresca. Sin embargo, son poquísimos los historiadores y sociólogos que han comparado estas dos máximas expresiones del totalitarismo moderno, lo cual tiene un fuerte tufo ideológico.

La filósofa y politóloga alemana –de origen judío– Hannah Arendt sí hizo la comparación y en “Los orígenes del totalitarismo”, publicado en 1951, mostró que estos dos experimentos sociales que vapulearon al siglo XX son hermanos gemelos.

Si nos remitimos a las enciclopedias y a los ensayos sobre el tema, el fascismo es una ideología política que plantea el colectivismo por encima del individualismo, coloca al Estado y la nación por encima de individuo, rechaza la “democracia burguesa”, el libre mercado, la competencia capitalista, y suprime todos los partidos políticos excepto el fascista, encargado de construir una sociedad perfecta.

El partido y el gobierno fascistas exigen total obediencia a las masas, a las que adoctrinan para la formación de un “hombre nuevo” superior y sumiso que será el protagonista de la sociedad nueva que se construye. El Estado asume el control absoluto de los medios de comunicación, suprime la libertad de prensa y crea una gran maquinaria de propaganda que machaca la superioridad del fascismo y exalta al líder supremo, en el que se concentran todos los poderes del país cual emperador romano.

A propósito, es importante destacar que al finalizar la Primera Guerra Mundial, aunque Italia fue uno de los aliados vencedores no recibió mucho crédito por ello. Benito Mussolini exacerbó ese resentimiento italiano e impulsó un nacionalismo revanchista que canalizó en 1919 al crear los “Fasci Italiani di Combattimento”, grupos armados que en 1920 pasaron a ser el Partido Nacional Fascista de Italia. Mussolini soñaba con un renacimiento del Imperio Romano y se inspiraba en los antiguos césares. Por eso levantaba su brazo derecho para saludar, como en la Roma imperial. Hitler luego haría lo mismo.

El líder y el partido fascistas siembran en la población el odio a un enemigo imaginario interior o exterior, para alentar el nacionalismo. La desinformación, la manipulación y la represión son los pilares básicos del sistema. Se identifica al líder supremo con la nación.

No se suprime la propiedad privada, pero las industrias son obligadas a producir lo que el gobierno les ordena y así quedan ensambladas al Estado. Los pequeños y medianos negocios se mantienen independientes, aunque pueden ser sometidos a las directrices fascistas.

El Estado paternalista interviene en todos los aspectos de la vida del individuo, al que libera así de su “miedo a la libertad”, al decir del psicólogo y filósofo alemán Erich Fromm. No existen los derechos individuales.

Hay algunas diferencias entre el fascismo alemán y el italiano. Este último se basa en el Estado como su piedra angular, al que considera el espíritu del pueblo.

El nationalsozialismus (nazismo), aunque estatista igualmente, tiene como eje gravitacional lo que el historiador polaco-judío Zeev Sternhell denomina el “determinismo biológico”, o sea, la “raza superior”, una corrupción grotesca del principio darwinista de la evolución de las especies. Se trata de un racismo demencial que canalizó el exterminio de los judíos y de los seres “inferiores” al ario alemán, el superhombre de que hablaba el filósofo racista Friederick Nietzsche.

Socialismo real: ‘nada contra el Estado’

Mussolini resumía la filosofía fascista con una frase: “Todo en el Estado, nada contra el Estado, nada fuera del Estado”.

En junio de 1961 Fidel Castro repitió esa misma frase al trazar la política cultural socialista cubana: “Dentro de la revolución (léase Estado) todo, contra la revolución, nada, ningún derecho”. ¿Casualidad? No lo creo, Castro en su juventud fue un gran admirador de Mussolini.

Las bases del comunismo son igualmente el colectivismo, el partido único, la propaganda y el adoctrinamiento de las “masas”, de las que exige total sumisión para formar al hombre nuevo que vivirá en la sociedad superior. Se suprime la libertad de prensa, se alienta el odio a un enemigo imaginario (el imperialismo y sus agentes internos) para exacerbar el nacionalismo patriótico y mantener una psicología permanente de plaza sitiada.

Todos los poderes del Estado se concentran en el primer secretario del Partido Comunista, que deviene César. El sistema se afinca igualmente sobre la represión, la desinformación y manipulación de la realidad nacional e internacional, prohíbe el libre mercado, identifica patria y pueblo con el líder supremo, y controla totalmente la vida del individuo, que es despojado de casi todos sus derechos.

El socialismo sí suprime toda la propiedad privada, no permite ningún pequeño negocio propio, ni que los ciudadanos inviertan un solo centavo en el país.

Expansión y represión

La expansión territorial nazi fue mediante la guerra más sangrienta ocurrida jamás y los crímenes más atroces, pero el comunismo desde sus orígenes igualmente planteó establecer la dictadura del proletariado a nivel planetario por medio de la violencia y no por la vía democrática de las urnas.

Desde la Internacional Comunista dirigida por Carlos Marx, el comunismo propugna la revolución social para imponerse a como dé lugar. Como decía el Che Guevara, convertir a cada revolucionario en “una perfecta máquina de matar”. La Unión Soviética expandió el socialismo a punta de bayoneta por Europa del Este y parte de Asia.

Cuba desde los años 60 diseminó por Latinoamérica guerrillas rurales, y urbanas que asaltaban bancos y cometían atentados terroristas. El plan de Castro y el Che era imponer continentalmente el comunismo.

En cuanto a represión, los nazis sobrepasaron todos los límites del horror, pero Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc. no eran monjitas de la caridad. Mataron o provocaron la muerte por hambre a 100 millones de personas, según el “Libro negro del comunismo”, un estudio realizado por profesores europeos, casi todos de izquierda, publicado en 1997.

En Cuba, según las fuentes independientes, han sido fusilados unos 5,500 opositores desde 1959, muchos in situ, sin proceso legal alguno. En los 10 meses que estuvo al frente de la Fortaleza de La Cabaña, el Che Guevara ordenó la ejecución de 209 opositores sin el debido proceso legal, a muchos de los cuales él personalmente les dio el tiro de gracia en la cabeza.

El 17 de abril de 1961, horas después de Castro declarar el carácter comunista de la revolución y mientras desembarcaba una brigada de cubanos exiliados por Bahía de Cochinos, fueron arrestados y enviados a instalaciones y campos de concentración unos 340,000 ciudadanos, sin juicio, sólo porque no simpatizaban con el gobierno.

Entre 1960 y 1971 miles de familias campesinas completas fueron sacadas de sus hogares y tierras en la provincia central de Las Villas, donde unos 3,000 opositores se alzaron en armas contra Castro en los años 60, y reubicadas a la fuerza en la provincia occidental de Pinar del Río, a 400 kilómetros de distancia, lo que generó los llamados Pueblos Cautivos, 21 en total, que eran aldeas-presidios al estilo de las de Siberia durante la época de Stalin. Muchas de las mujeres fueron sacadas de esos pueblos cautivos y llevadas con sus hijos para el reparto Miramar en La Habana, con lo cual separaron a las familias como en Cambodia.

Hoy las torturas psicológicas y físicas siguen vigente en Cuba. La frase “pásale la mano” es común entre los jefes de prisiones para ordenar palizas a los presos de conciencia “que no se portan bien”.

En fin, parafraseando a José Martí –y salvando las circunstancias y el simbolismo patriótico de la frase martiana—es evidente que el comunismo y el fascismo son del totalitarismo las dos alas. O dicho popularmente, son el mismo perro con diferente collar.

Amenper: Chattanooga Choo Choo, Bye Bye Union

La caída del gobierno del General Machado fue la consecuencia de una huelga general en 1933. La creación por los comunistas de sindicatos entre 1934 y 1945 se llevó a cabo con el apoyo de la U.R.S.S. Se nos explica como Fulgencio Batista fundó la C.T.C. y la entregó a los comunistas en 1938. Todos los obreros cubanos debían cotizar con el 1% de sus salarios. En Cuba había un millón y medio de personas que contribuían con parte de sus salarios a los sindicatos, para una población de sólo seis millones de personas, un verdadero récord considerando el índice de desempleo y el hecho que la mujer no había entrado completamente en el la corriente laboral.

La sindicalización obligatoria en Cuba tenía una gama extensa con pocas excepciones y el apoyo de todos los gobiernos populistas desde el 1933 incluyendo al populista dictador Batista.

Claro que los que conocimos en Cuba al sindicalismo autoritario y sin respeto al concepto de la economía de mercado, no podemos ser sindicalistas. Pero esto no era más que parte del socialismo en Cuba en los años cincuenta que pavimentó el camino a la implantación de lo que tenemos hoy.

En un país como los Estados Unidos, que se ha formado en la economía de libre mercado, tiene que haber muchos obreros que no pueden estar de acuerdo con el sindicalismo en sus centros de trabajo, y eso se nota en la cada vez más aguda desaprobación a la creación de sindicatos por los trabajadores en elecciones libres en sus empresas. Pero también estamos viendo cómo están usando el ambiente socialista creado por la administración Obama, para circunvenir el proceso democrático a través de legalismos en la Corte Suprema. O sea que quieren considerar inválido en voto democrático de los trabajadores para imponer la sindicalización obligatoria. Como puso Cervantes en la boca del Quijote, “Cosas veredes Sancho”-

La votación, en que los trabajadores en la planta de Volkswagen de Chattanooga rechazó la United Auto Workers, es un revés para el trabajo organizado en una región que los sindicatos consideran clave para su crecimiento. También se ve como una amarga derrota porque VW sí mismo no se oponen a la Unión, o sea que la patronal aceptaba el sindicato y fueron los trabajadores los que lo rechazaron. Si la unidad hubiera sido aceptada, podría haber construido impulso para la organización de otras plantas de automóviles. Por eso ahora quieren hacerlo por la fuerza de legalismos.

Un profesor de relaciones laborales expresó en caso de una manera muy acertada. Dijo, “Esto no fue sólo una pérdida de la UAW, fue una pérdida para la AFL-CIO y el movimiento obrero entero," “El movimiento sindical tiene un producto que están vendiendo y la gente no lo está comprando”

El editorial del WSJ de hoy explica el significado de la votación de los obreros de Tennessee, el tren de Chattanooga Choo Choo arrolló a los sindicalistas.

Volkswagen's Union Defeat

Workers prove to be smarter than their bosses in Tennessee.

The decision by workers at the Volkswagen VOW3.XE -1.28% plant in Chattanooga, Tennessee to reject the United Auto Workers is the best news so far this year for the American economy. Even with Volkswagen management on its side, the union that combined with CEOs to nearly ruin U.S. car makers couldn't persuade a majority voting in a secret ballot to let it become their agent to bargain with the foreign-owned company.

This wasn't merely one more failed union organizing attempt. The UAW and its chief Bob King spent years working toward this vote as part of its strategy to organize plants in the American South, and all the stars were aligned in its favor.

Mr. King colluded with IG Metall, Volkswagen's German union, to neutralize Volkswagen management. It pitched the collaborative vision of a labor-management "works council" at the plant that makes the VW Passat, and it claimed to have learned its lesson from the confrontation and strikes that hurt Detroit's auto makers. Volkswagen management gave the union the run of the plant to lobby workers while denying similar privileges to union opponents.

So it's nothing short of remarkable that the union couldn't make the sale. The failure reflects how well the plant's workers are doing without a union, to the tune of $27 an hour including benefits. The defeat also speaks to the harm the UAW has done to itself by driving GM and Chrysler to bankruptcy and pushing companies like Caterpillar to move new production from union plants.

Workers assemble Volkswagen Passat sedans at the German automaker's plant in Chattanooga, Tenn. in June 2013. Associated Press

These columns have long argued that a company organized by a union usually deserves what it gets, but most workers understand that the modern union offer is often a Faustian bargain. The UAW may be able to negotiate a near-term increase in pay and job security for current workers. But the price—in addition to the steep coerced dues—is usually a less competitive company that means less security and fewer jobs in the long run. The best proof is the UAW itself: It has lost 75% of its members in 35 years as its demands and work rules made their employers less competitive.

That long run might have come soon for Volkswagen's Chattanooga workers. They know the company may decide as early as this month where to build a new SUV for the U.S. market, and the Tennessee plant is competing with Mexico for the job. Mexico already benefits from a low-tariff, free-trade pact with the European Union that the U.S. is only now negotiating, and a UAW victory would have been an additional incentive to go south of the Rio Grande.

The union is blaming Tennessee politicians for raising this possibility, especially GOP Senator Bob Corker, a former mayor of Chattanooga who helped bring Volkswagen to the city and who said last week that he felt "assured" (he didn't say by whom) that the Tennessee plant would get the second production line if it rejected the union. The company disavowed that claim, but the union may use it as an excuse for defeat and to file an unfair labor practice complaint under the Wagner Act with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

This isn't likely to fly on the merits. Mr. Corker may have been impolitic. But he didn't give up his right to free speech when he joined the Senate, and every public action by Volkswagen had favored the union. State legislators had said they might withhold future tax incentives if the UAW organized the plant, and Tennessee had reason to believe that a UAW success would hurt its ability to recruit other companies that would fear the union precedent.

Don't believe those who say this means the end of the UAW. It has too many friends in high political places, as the 2009 auto bailouts proved. Federal law is also stacked in favor of unions, and President Obama's NLRB is routinely stretching and breaking the law to make it even more so.

But the fact that unions must rely on brute government force shows how out of touch they are with modern economic reality. American manufacturing is making a modest comeback with the help of rising labor costs in China and the American energy revolution. But it could stage an even bigger revival without the threat that unions could once again make American production uncompetitive. The last thing the U.S. economy needs is to import European labor practices. In Chattanooga, and not for the first time, the workers are smarter than management.

Gatria: America " Wake-Up

Ayer, Lunes 17 de Febrero, todos o por lo menos los bancos más

importantes de Estados Unidos se mantubieron cerrados observando

el holiday no solo de Lincoln y de Washington sino de todos los Presidentes de esta gran nacion.

Pero para el Chase Manhattan este holiday careció de importancia,

Chase Manhattan abrió sus puertas como un día normal. Sin embargo

lo que llama grandemente la atención es que Chase Manhattan

si observó el dia de Martin Luther King, ese día Chase se mantuvo

cerrado.

Yo personalmente por escrito y con copia al CEO cerraré mi cuenta

con Chase Manhattan.

Siempre habra quien diga que esto lo hago porque soy racista, por

eso como dato adicional les diré que cuando abrí esta cuenta, la

persona a cargo "MANAGER", de esta sucursal en Lyndhurst era y es una

mujer Afro-Americana.

Qué pena que ya algunas empresas no respeten a nuestros Padres Fundadores. Pero la culpa no es toda de éllos, la culpa también es de nosotros que nos quedamos callados. Yo estoy hablando y cerrando

mi cuenta corriente con Chase. Estoy haciendo mi parte.

¿ Y Tu que vas a hacer...........?.

COMERCIO Y VIAJES A CUBA

Me pregunto si algún cubano que haya salido en busca de Libertad ha podido olvidar las humillaciones, los desmanes, la miseria y las violaciones sufridas a todos sus Derechos durante el poco o mucho tiempo que haya vivido bajo la tiranía marxista de Castro.

¿ Es que acaso, ese cubano dispuesto a visitar la Isla donde el verdugo que mantiene esclavizado a todo un pueblo, solo trajo a tierras de Libertad el estomago para llenarlo y el cuerpo para vestirlo, pero dejo en la Isla cautiva: sus convicciones ?

¿ Puede llegar el grado de masoquismo a ese extremo ?

No, no, no, mientras dure esa tiranía en la que un día hicieron alianza la crápula y los ineptos, nosotros no podemos entrar de rodillas. Mientras sigan dirigiendo los destinos de nuestra Patria los asesinos de tantos hermanos, si fuéramos, seria para reclamar justicia, pero no para disfrutar junto a ellos, las bellezas de nuestro País.

Esa belleza que hoy se confunde con la tristeza y el sufrimiento, esa belleza que se opaca con la miseria y la discriminación a los más humildes, esa belleza que se convierte en dolor al ver a los jóvenes vendiendo lo único que poseen: Su Cuerpo, para poder comer. Esa belleza se pierde al saber que son muchos los que tratan de escapar de la realidad, unos por medio del suicidio y otros a través del alcohol porque han perdido la ilusión y la esperanza.

Vas a visitar una nación que condecora con grados de coronel a asesinos que lo único que aprendieron fue a matar y regocijarse viendo caer al indefenso. Vas a visitar una nación que ha creado un hombre nuevo sin dignidad, sin sentimientos y sin valores. Ese hombre nuevo es la clonación de Castro y compañía. Vas a visitar una Isla (que aunque naciste allí), está gobernada por un tirano que un día te convirtió en apátrida. Pudiera recordarte todo el dolor que ha causado el tirano en esa Isla a la que yo también amo tanto….

A Cuba nada, a Cuba no hay que ir mientras esos bastardos estén en el poder.

Negociar con Cuba o visitarla es ser cómplice y colaborador de la opresión.

Diego Quiros, Sr

Ricardo Samitier: 1- Sin Duda Skull & Bones Es Una De Las Logias Masónicas Mas Poderosa Del Mundo... ¿Qué Significan Sus Signos y 322?

Como pueden ver, la sociedad secreta Skull & Bones, tiene su numero, es el 322

Significa el 22 de marzo. Primer día de la primavera. Como los masones, rechazan

a un Dios, su Dios es la Naturaleza su religión es la política.

Sus armas, el dinero, las mentiras y el engaño.

La logia Calavera y Huesos es una de las pocas que proclama que su participación

Es hasta la muerte y que los traidores serán ASESINADOS... tan violenta es esta

Logia que sus símbolos son también los usados por los PIRATAS y es usado para

Identificar los VENENOS...

Esta poderosa logia ha producido 3 presidentes de Estados Unidos...

los 2 Bush y el presidente Taft... debido al secreto masónico no sabemos

cuantos miembros existen en la estructura del gobierno de USA... pero

en la actualidad el “PACIFISTA” John Kerry ministro de relaciones exteriores

de USA... es también un miembro de la Logia...

Para la mayoría de los ciudadanos NADA DE ESO...

ES CONFLICTO DE INTERESES...

2- ¿Como Es Posible; Que Gente Inteligente

Y Que Llegan A Puestos Importantes...

Al Mismo Tiempo... No Sepan De Donde

Son Sus Abuelos?

Ahora resulta que Jonh Kerry… igual que Madeleine

Albright, no supieran que sus abuelos eran JUDÍOS…

Ambos se dicen ser CATÓLICOS... pero están a favor

Del aborto, el divorcio y el matrimonio homosexual...

¿Les Creemos?

3- Dos Cubanos Republicanos Y Un Cubano Demócrata Fueron Cómplices De MATAR La Constitución De USA?

John Boehner y sus 28 traidores republicanos , que incluyen a Ileana Ros Lethenen y a

Mario Díaz Balard han permitido a Abana, dinero ilimitado .

Sí, el límite de la deuda federal ahora se ha suspendido... hasta Marzo del 2015.

Antes de esta ley , el límite de la deuda era una CANTIDAD fija.

Que forzaba al Gobierno Federal, a parar sus gastos cuando llegaba a ese límite.

Ahora, Se Trata De Una Fecha Fija... Pueden seguir

Imprimiendo dinero sin limite... hasta Marzo 2015...

Eso le permite a Obama y los Socialistas Dinero para

Ganar las elecciones de Noviembre 2014...

En la Constitución , sólo la Cámara de Representantes puede escribir el presupuesto.

El Senado sólo puede aprobar o negar un Presupuesto de la Cámara .

El Senado cuenta con una mayoría demócrata , y lo aprobó .

Pero el congreso está controlada por los republicanos.

Todos los demócratas de la Cámara votaron por la eliminación del límite de la deuda

y 28 TRAIDORES republicanos votaron con ellos.

¿Qué Le Da Al Presidente La Autoridad Para Hacer Lo Que Quiera !

Eso Se Llama Dictadura !

El Congreso ha abandonado sus deberes constitucionales .

El concepto de 3 ramas distintas de gobierno,

cada limitación de la otra y todas las comprobaciones y balances previstos contra una

rama que tiene demasiado poder, ahora HAN VOTADO CONTRA LOS PRINCIPIOS DE USA.

Ahora; Todas Las Ramas, Están De Acuerdo, Contra Los Intereses Del Pueblo .

La República Ha Muerto.

¡Viva El Rey! Gritan Los Socialistas...

Solo Un “Julio Cesar” Puede Salvar a Estados Unidos... y arrestar por TRAICIÓN A LA CONSTITUCIÓN

a Todos Los Politiqueros...

AQUI TIENEN LA NOTICIA…

Debt Limit Raised to INFINITY!

The measure does not raise the debt limit by a set amount but would suspend it through March 15, 2015, to allow Treasury to borrow the money it needs to pay bills like Social Security benefits, payments on government debt, and checks for federal workers.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/101393329

Why the Globalists Selected Obama to be President.

What most Americans fail to realize is that the destruction of America has been planned for and is currently underway. The craziness coming out of Washington is not the result of incompetent politicians. Rather, the politicians are doing the bidding of Wall Street in order to accomplish a complete take down of this country. This is being accomplished in such a stealth manner, that the American people will no idea what is happening to them until it is too late.

A Rookie Leads America Down the Primrose Path

The fact that this country was ignorant enough and gullible enough to elect a man with such a questionable background with no accomplishments, to his name, which would represent anything of value, is reason enough to say that America made her own bed and now must lie in it.

Amazingly, Obama only served one term in the State Senate of Illinois and only a partial term in the U.S. Senate prior to being elected president. Don’t you wish you could virtually start at the top with almost no experience like Obama did? What was this country thinking when they elected a man that very few knew anything about and a man who had done virtually nothing except raise hell in Chicago as a “community organizer?” The fact of the matter was that Obama was fast-tracked to become president because he had an agenda (21).

This article discusses the fact that Obama was chosen to purposely destroy the American economy. In order to discuss this goal, Obama was to employ two strategies so that he could eventually achieve his prime directive which was to economically destroy the United States. Obama subsequently drew from his experiences derived from the days of his communist laden youth experiences which culminated in Obama following the strategy of Cloward and Piven and the Weatherman Underground which were both designed to collapse the U.S.

The Authors of the Obama Blueprint

Cloward and Piven present at the signing of NAFTA. This plot has been a long time coming.

Please allow me introduce you to the people whose writings inspired Obama to complete the task of collapsing of our economic system, Richard Cloward and Francis Fox Piven. Cloward and Piven authored the Cloward-Piven strategy which has been a long time coming and is fully in place in the United States.

This isn’t some conspiracy theory being set forth as these two former Columbia professors wrote about collapsing the economy and how they planned to do it in the article they co-authored in the 1960′s called, “Mobilizing the Poor: How it Could Be Done.” Six months after the initial publication, it was published in The Nation, under the title “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty.”

Both publications were inspired by their belief in “social justice and fundamentally transformative change in America.” Interesting choice of words. Where have we heard these terms before? Didn’t Obama say something about fundamentally transforming America?

Inspired by the riots in LA in 1965, Cloward and Piven wrote and published their article which outlined the best way to bring the kind of extreme radical type of social change was to economically destroy America. In their estimation, the plan was designed to overwhelm the system and bring about the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with impossible demands and bring on an economic collapse mostly accomplished by the imposition of a massive welfare system made necessary by a contrived failing economy.

There are presently 97 million full-time working Americans as compared to 101 million Americans receiving some form of welfare. One would have to conclude that Cloward and Piven eventually achieved their goal of overwhelming the American economy through Obama’s presidency.

Cloward, Piven and the Weatherman Underground

Mix in a little homicidal terrorism, and the Weatherman Underground fully embraced Cloward and Piven’s strategies. TARP, representing the greatest wealth transfer in American history, is another example of collapsing the system and the plan had its roots in the partnership of philosophy between the Weathermen and Cloward and Piven. TARP was largely written by the Apollo Alliance, whose alumni include Obama appointee, Van Jones. In New York, the Apollo Alliance is headed by Weather Underground co-founder, Jeff Jones, who was a partner and close friend to Bill Ayers in the radical terrorist group and in whose living room Barack Obama launched his political career in Chicago.

George Soros is the source of funding for most of these radical groups and that Soros and Jeff Jones went into one of the poorest sections of New York and gave away hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of our stimulus money.

The ACORN connections are infamous. These “community organizers” are receiving untold billions in taxpayer money, despite massive voter registration fraud and corruption. Still, Congress won’t turn off the spicket. Does it sound like someone is trying to overload the system yet in the spirit of Cloward and Piven?

Obama Has Been Groomed for the Presidency For a Long Time

Comrade Obama’s ascension to the presidency has been a long time in the making. Interestingly, Barack Obama’s past associates especially the communist terrorists which funded his Harvard legal education and ultimately launched his political career as an Illinois state senator, namely, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, have been in lockstep with Obama his entire adult life. However, Dohrn and Ayers were not the first to indoctrinate Obama with the Marxist communist philosophy. For that information, we have to begin with Frank Marshall Davis.

Obama’s real father, Frank Marshall Davis, was a member of the Communist Party and a former Soviet Agent who was under FBI investigation for a total of 19 years. In 1948, Davis moved from Chicago to Hawaii leaving behind a colleague named Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of Senior White House adviser, Valerie Jarrett. Yes, the Jarrett’s are communists as well. Both Jarrett and Davis wrote for a left-wing newspaper called the Chicago Defender in which they espoused a communist takeover of the United States Government which contained many of Cloward and Piven’s strategies. In 1971, Davis, according to Joel Gilbert, was reunited with his then nine-year-old son, Barack Obama, and schooled him in the ways of being a good communist for the next nine years.

Adding more fuel to this communist fire, it is interesting to note that both Senior White House Advisers, David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett were both “Red Diaper Babies, in which they were the sons and daughters of well-to-do parents who desired to live under communism and lived out their dreams through their children’s revolutionary activities. Other notable red-diaper babies also include such notables as Rahm Emanuel and Eric Holder. The Obama administration is just one big happy “red” family aren’t they?

Valerie Jarrett’s situation is particularly interesting in that her family and the Ayers family have been multi-generational friends which also included a marriage between the two families. Much of the Obama administration is a nest of communists and this should serve to gravely concern every American citizen.

Bill Ayers, the father of Obama’s political career.

Following the nine years of mentoring and parenting by Frank Davis, Obama made some very important communist connections which ultimately led to him obtaining an impressive college education financed by some very familiar communist activists’, namely, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

The Prairie Fire book was co-authored by Dohrn and Ayers, and, quite unbelievably, it was dedicated to Sirhan Sirhan, Robert Kennedy’s assassin. While appearing on The Common Sense Show, former FBI informant, the late Larry Grathwohl, revealed that he testified in a court of law that Ayers and Dohrn had direct involvement in a terrorist plot which killed San Francisco police sergeant, Brian V. McDonnell, by a bomb made and planted by these Weathermen Underground terrorists.

Grathwohl also revealed that he asked Ayers, in a meeting of about 25 well-to do Weatherman, most with advanced degrees from Ivy League Universities, what the Weathermen planned to do when they achieved their goal of a communist take over the government. Grathwohl stated that Ayers paused for a moment and then said that it was likely that about 50 million Americans will have to be re-educated in concentration camps located in the American Southwest and that about 25 million would have to be eliminated, meaning that they would have to be murdered. Bill and Bernardine’s Weather Underground also had the support of Cuba, East German intelligence and the North Vietnamese. I believe that in Obama’s second term, and with the power granted to him by the NDAA, that he is very capable of fulfilling Ayers’ promise to Grathwohl to incarcerate 50 million innocent Americans.

During the Vietnam war era, Ayers championed black civil rights and he and Dohrn further chastised white society for their treatment of blacks. Grathwohl also revealed that Ayers wanted to support the beginning of a race war by killing whites, from supposed black villains, and then blaming whites in order to begin a race war. How eerily similar does this sound to the Charles Manson Family and their Helter Skelter plans to execute that very same objective? Perhaps we now know why Obama’s Justice Department were the ones that would not let go of the Trayvon Martin case. This is the same strategy of creating racial division, just applied in a different generation.

While Grathwohl was infiltrating the Weathermen, Ayers ordered FBI infiltrator, Grathwohl, to blow up a Detroit police substation to which Grathwohl said that a nearby restaurant , where many blacks ate would suffer many casualties. Ayers replied that some have to die for a revolution to proceed. This is the man who was the father of Obama’s political career.

Ayers and Dohrn raised a son, Chesa Boudin, who worked for Hugo Chavez , communist dictator formerly in charge of Venezuela. Chesa Boudin was the child of Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert, members of a Weather Underground spin-off group who went to prison for an armored car robbery that resulted in the murders of two police officers and a security guard. Dohrn served seven in prison for her role in the robbery and this is the reason that she is ineligible to become bar certified as an attorney. Is anyone else uncomfortable with the fact that Ayers and Dohrn were the ones primarily responsible for educating Obama with the communist funds and then subsequently launched his political career from their living room? Well, it is true, please read on.

Who Paid for Obama’s College Education?

Allen Hulton, a 39 year veteran of the postal service, provided a sworn affidavit to Maricopa County, AZ. Sheriff investigators, led by Sheriff Joe Arpaio, in an effort toward determining whether or not the former foreign college student, Barack Obama, was eligible to be placed on Arizona’s 2012 election ballot. After reviewing Hulton’s affidavit, it is apparent that Ayers and Dohrn were in fact the de facto adoptive parents to this foreign student destined to become the first illegitimate President of the United States. As a result, Obama was treated to the finest Ivy League education that communist backed money could buy as Hulton maintains that the Ayers told him that he was financing the education of a promising foreign student at Harvard. Hulton also testified that he met Obama while at the Ayer’s home and he asked Obama what he going to do with all his education, to which Obama politely answered, “I am going to become the President.” Readers should take note that this is an affidavit, and as such, is formally considered to be evidence, not conjecture or hearsay. There can be no other conclusion that the communist terrorist, Bill Ayers, began grooming Obama to become America’s first communist President during Obama’s college years. Their relationship continues into the present time as it is on record that Ayers visited the White House in August of 2009.

We also know that Obama’s communist affiliations continued well into his adulthood because of the good work of Joel Gilbert who discovered that Obama was active with a Weathermen Underground support group known as The May 19th Communist Organization, in New York. Perhaps, this is why Ayers was visiting the White House.

Frank Chapman, a communist activist and a member of the communist front group known as the World Peace Council. Chapman clearly used the term “mole” to describe Obama. He said Obama’s political climb and subsequent success in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries was “a dialectical leap ushering in a qualitatively new era of struggle.” Chapman further stated that, “Marx once compared revolutionary struggle with the work of the mole, who sometimes burrows so far beneath the ground that he leaves no trace of his movement on the surface. This is the old revolutionary ‘mole,’ not only showing his traces on the surface but also breaking through. The Communist Party USA backs Obama to the hilt.” It is clear that Obama is their man!

Crisis Creation

Cloward and Piven instructed activists, such as the one’s in the Weathermen Underground, that if a crisis did not exist, promote or manufacture one by exaggerating some threatening predicament. Global warming and healthcare would certainly fit the description, wouldn’t it?

Obamacare is turning America into a nation of part time workers to avoid the regulations and taxes associated with the program and this will undoubtedly bankrupt most small businesses.

The primary agenda of bringing on of an economic collapse was achieved through the development of contrived economic crises designed to weaken the economy. Does this make anyone else think of the free trade agreements, NAFTA and CAFTA, in which we have seen millions of jobs leaving for overseas labor market after Wall Street got Congress to do away with American jobs by eliminating tariffs’. Say goodbye to the poster child for this plan, Detroit. However, Detroit is not alone, St. Louis and Cleveland will be the next major cities to declare bankruptcy. The Cloward and Piven designed collapse is occurring right here, right now.

And then of course, we come full circle to the explosion of the American welfare state in which half of the work eligible population are on some form of welfare. Please tell me what business could survive with half of its employees still getting paid while producing nothing? The same principle applies to a country as well.