No 750 “En mi
opinión” Jueves
Septiembre 25, 2014
(EMO) HOY POR LA MANANA ESCUCHE EN LA RADIO QUE EL
“HOMOSEXUAL DEL ALMA” (NO SE SI EN LA PRACTICA CARNAL) CHARLIE CHRIST” ESTA
EMPATADO CON EL GOBERNADOR SCOT EN LA INTENCION DE VOTO. YO NO PUEDO CREER QUE
HALLA TANTAS PERSONAS QUE DESEEN TENER OTRO OBAMA EN LA FLORIDA. HAY QUE TENER
UN ESPIRITUD HOMOXESUAL-POLITICO Y CARNAL PARA VOTAR POR ESTE CANTINFLESCO
PERSONAJE DESPUES DE TODO EL HISTORIAL COMO GOBERNADOR DE LA FLORIDA. SI ESO
OCURE\RE ESO SERA LA INDICADOR MAS CLAROS QUE AL MENOS LA MITAD DE LOS
FLORIDANOS SON SUICIDAS POLITICOS.
LAZARO R GONZALEZ MIÑO.
QUE Sr.Kevin M.Cabrera
Field Director Carlos Curbelo For Congress
Desde hace varios meses iniciamos una campaña contra
la candidatura del incumbente congresista del distrito #26 del estado de la
Florida Joe Garcia.En aquella epoca no sabiamos todavia quien iba a ser el
candidato del partido republicano.
Nosotros los cubanos exiliados simplemente sentimos un
profundo desprecio hacia el Sr.Joe Garcia por ser un simpatizante de la
ideologia marxista lenninista.El mismo lo admitio'cuando dijo textualmente
"Communism Work".
El Sr.Joe Garcia es un ferviente admirador del
castrismo opresor,sus declaraciones a favor de la dictadura militar de los
Castro son frecuentes.El exilio cubano que tiene derecho al voto lo desprecia.
Joe Garcia tiene poderosos amigos que contribuyen a su
campaña,tiene conexiones con el radicalismo islamico y con el comunismo
internacional a traves de los hermanos Castro.No me sorprenderia que hubiera
contribuciones ilicitas del castrismo y de los radicales islamicos a su
campaña.
Usted debe saber como poder ayudar a la candidatura
del Sr.Carlos Curbelo pues por eso es el Field Director de su campaña,yo
simplemente soy un cubano que ha dedicado su vida a combatir al marxismo
lenninismo,y estoy muy preocupado no solo por los destinos de mi patria
Cuba,pero tambien de mi patria adoptiva los Estados Unidos.
Solo le escribo estas lineas con mi mejor intencion de
tratar de ayudar a la campaña del Sr.Carlos Curbelo y tengo tres
humildes sugerencias.
La primera es acercarse al exilio cubano,probablemente
ya ustedes lo esten haciendo,pero existe una oportunidad magnifica donde
estara' la prensa local y probablemente nacional,que le daria una gran
cobertura de propaganda que no le costaria un solo centavo a la campaña del
Sr.Curbelo,y me refiero a que el proximo 18 de Septiembre en el Auditorium del
condado Dade de la calle Flager y 29 ave se presentara' un duo de cantantes
simpatizantes y agentes del castrismo,se llaman "Buena Fe".Estos
autotitulados "artistas" vienen aqui a provocar al exilio
cubano.Quienes son los responsables de traerlos? pues dos amigos de Joe
Garcia,los señores Hugo Cancio y Alexis Valdes.Al final de la hoja de Cuba
Nacionalista nosotros publicamos la foto donde Garcia esta' con estos elementos
del castrismo.El exilio cubano ha hecho un llamado a demostrar frente al auditorium
el proximo 18 de Septiembre contra la presentacion de estos
"artistas" del regimen de Castro.
Creemos es una gran oportunidad si el Sr.Carlos
Curbelo apoyara la demostracion con su presencia o si el no pudiera asistir por
razones de que tiene otros compromisos sus mas cercanos colaboradores
asistieran.
Se imagina usted Sr.Cabrera la propaganda que
recibiera el Sr.Curbelo si asistiera a la demostracion contra la actuacion
provocativa
de estos "artistas"del regimen de Castro
traidos a Miami por elementos simpatizantes del castrismo amigos del Sr.Joe
Garcia?
Como le dije anteriormente alli estara' la prensa
local y nacional.Esta demostracion de cubanos el proximo 18 de Septiembre
frente al Auditorium del condado Dade situado en la calle Flager y 29 Ave,es
una demostracion pacifica y dentro de las leyes.
La segunda sugerencia que quizas ya ustedes la sepan
es que el Sr.Garcia apoya la inmigracion ilegal a los Estados Unidos,sin
importarle quienes sean estos ilegales que quizas entre ellos existan terroristas
y criminales.El Sr.Garcia le importa muy poco la seguridad de los Estados
Unidos porque es un simpatizante del comunismo,como el mismo lo admitio'.El
condado de Key West es un condado que es de tendencia del partido
democrata,pero tambien los que viven son americanos de economia bastante
desahogada y si ellos se enteran que el Sr.Garcia es un abierto defensor de los
ilegales quizas pudiera restarle votos de Norteamericanos que no estan de
acuerdo que los Estados Unidos sean invadidos por personas que la mayoria no
tienen educacion,que pueden traer enfermedades y que muchos son
antinorteamericanos..
La tercera sugerencia es que quizas ustedes deberian
investigar si las organizaciones radicales islamicas y la dictadura de Casro
estan contribuyendo ilegalmente a la candidatura del Sr.Joe Garcia.
A nosotros no nos sorprenderia pues el castrismo ha
contribuido en el pasado con los candidatos simpatizantes del regimen cubano.
Estas sugerencias son simplemente eso sugerencias
porque nosotros los cubanos exiliados estamos muy interesados en derrotar el
proximo Noviembre al candidato del Castrismo y del Comunismo Internacional Joe
Garcia.
Sin mas,deseandole mucha suerte y ofreciendole nuestra
hoja de Cuba Nacionalista que es leida por miles de personas para lo que
necesite la candidatura del Sr.Carlos Curbelo.
Atentamente
Horacio Minguillon Alonso
Leyes de inmigración en Arabia Saudita y en Emiratos Árabes
Unidos. M. alemán.
"Es muy difícil enseñar a quien no quiere aprender" Anónímo griego de hace 3000 años
|
¿Recuerdas la madre musulmana que protestó porque había un Crucifijo en la clase y eso ofendía a su hijo y casi le dan la razón? Pues lee y que no te se olvide..... Legislación para extranjeros inmigrantes 1. Il n'y aura pas de programmes en langues étrangères dans les écoles. No habrá programas de lenguas extranjeras en las escuelas. 2. Toutes les annonces du gouvernement et les élections se dérouleront dans la langue nationale. Todos los anuncios del gobierno y las elecciones se desarrollaran en lengua nacional. 3. Toutes les questions administratives auront lieu dans notre langue. Todas las cuestiones administrativas tendrán lugar en nuestra lengua. 4. Les étrangers ne seront pas un fardeau pour les contribuables. Pas de sécurité sociale, pas d'indemnité de repas, pas de soins de santé ou tout autre avantage public ne seront accordé. Tout abus provoquera l'expulsion Los extranjeros no serán una carga para los contribuyentes. No tendrán seguridad social, ni indemnización para comidas, no tendrán asistencia sanitaria, ninguna otra ventaja pública le será acordada. Cualquier abuso provocará su expulsión. 5. Les étrangers peuvent investir dans ce pays, mais le montant doit s'élever au minimum à 40.000 fois la moyenne journalière de subsistance. Los extranjeros podrán invertir en este país, pero el importe mínimo tendrá que ser igual a 40.000 veces el salario mínimo. 6. Si les étrangers achètent de l'immobilier, les possibilités sont limitées. Certains terrains, en particulier les biens immobiliers disposants d'accès à l'eau courante, seront réservées pour les citoyens nés ici. Si los extranjeros compran bienes inmuebles, sus posibilidades están limitadas. Ciertos terrenos, en particular bienes inmuebles que tengan acceso al agua corriente, serán reservados para los ciudadanos nacidos aquí. 7. Les étrangers ne peuvent pas protester chez nous. Aucune manifestation, aucune utilisation d'un drapeau étranger, aucune organisation politique. Aucune calomnie sur notre pays, le gouvernement et sa politique. Toute violation conduira à l'expulsion Los extranjeros no pueden protestar en nuestro país. Ningún tipo de manifestación, ninguna utilización de una bandera extranjera, ninguna organización política. Ninguna calumnia dirigida hacia nuestro país, el gobierno y su política. Toda violación conducirá a la expulsión. 8. Si quelqu'un pénètre dans ce pays illégalement, il sera traqué sans merci. Arrêté, il sera détenu jusqu'à ce qu'il soit expulsé. Tous ses biens sont saisis. Si alguien penetra a este país ilegalmente, será acosado sin piedad. Detenido, y retenido hasta que sea expulsado. Todos sus bienes será, confiscados.
Y aquí tienes otra. Como decían en Cuba “Chúpate
esta”
|
¿Por qué no está Israel en la alianza contra el ISIS?
El presidente Obama anunció a la nación el comienzo el pasado
domingo del bombardeo de ISIS extendido hasta Siria.
El bombardeo sin limitaciones siempre ha sido algo necesario y que hacía
tiempo que se debía de haber ejecutado. El problema está en los
detalles.
Nunca una guerra se puede ganar con bombardeos solamente, al no ser que se
trate de un artefacto nuclear.
Tropas en el terreno son necesarias, y no sólo tropas en el terreno sino
tropas efectivas, preparadas y sin las limitaciones políticas.
Estas limitaciones, desgraciadamente, han ocurrido en todas las
guerras despuées de la última victoria, que fue la segunda guerra
mundial.
Hemos visto como el ejercito de los Estados Unidos se ha visto limitado en
sus operaciones por los vientos políticos de Washington. Se ha
permitido de Corea del Norte sea la amenaza que es hoy en día por las políticas
de Truman, que llegó hasta a destituir al General MacArthur cuando ya había
ocupado el territorio de Corea del Norte y quería contestar la intervención
China. (hay que recordar que ni China ni Rusia eran las
potencias nucleares en que se convirtieron después).
Estas limitaciones políticas las vimos despuésn en Vietnam y ahora lo
vemos en el Medio Oriente.
En sus feudos sirios, los extremistas del grupo estado islámico habían
estado entrando en edificios civiles y se había puesto bajo cubierta días antes
los Estados Unidos y sus aliados comenzaron los golpes con los bombardeos que
habían sido filtrados en las noticias con amplia anticipación..
Es una señal de las dificultades para tratar de destruir el grupo
apoyándose principalmente en ataques aéreos.
Romper el control de los militantes sobre las ciudades en Irak y Siria será
complicado porque el grupo fácilmente puede fundirse en la población. En la
ciudad iraquí de Mosul, los extremistas tienen suficiente apoyo entre los
suníes principalmente población musulmana que han reducido la presencia de sus
combatientes en las calles o se mezclan entre ellos, como si fueran
civiles, sin aparente preocupación sobre su control del poder.
Otro problema
es que como no hay fuerzas aliadas sobre el terreno preparado para entrar a
territorio bajo control de ISIS, control porque ahora deben
retirarse de las cercanías bajo los bombardeos aéreos.
Esto facilita
todavía más el control de ISIS que sólo se tiene qe limitar a
protegerse de los bombardeos.
Estas guerras
limitadas no funcionan, nunca han funcionado, y mucho menos en el terreno del
Medio Oriente. Los ataque aéreos le harán daño, sin lugar a dudas,
pero la victoria nunca se podrá completar si no se trata una guerra como lo que
es, una operación para eliminar al enemigo.
Ni siquiera
el poderío militar de la difunta Unión Soviética pudo lograr eliminar a los
guerrilleros de Bin Laden, en Afganistán y usaron todos sus recursos, aéreos y
con tropas.
Cómo vamos a
pensar que con unos aliados en el terreno, con una alianza
artificial, a los que le falta preparación y voluntad se podrá
derrotar a ISIS
Ayer ISIS estaba
amenazando con tomar el control del campo de aviación más grande de Irak y uno
de los puestos militares más importantes de los Estados Unidos durante su
ocupación del país. Esto ssignificaría
que ISIS puede vencer a lo mejor que pueda reunir el ejército iraquí, no sólo
las unidades del norte que han sido ignoradas. Significaría una derrota
estratégica para el ejército iraquí.
Esto
estaba sucediendo mientras se bombardeaba a Siria..
Estos son
los tipos de aliados con que cuenta la alianza en el terreno.
Si le damos el beneficio de la
duda, tenemos que pensar que tienen falta de preparación, a pesar de los
cientos de millones de dólares que se han gastado del dinero de los
contribuyentes para entrenarlos. De lo contrario tenemos que pensar
que son parte del enemigo.
Algunos como los "terroristas
moderados" de Siria, habían sido parte de ISIS, eran parte del Yihad para
destruir a la civilización occidental. Otros en gobiernos ahora parte de la
coalición son sospechosos de haber ayudado económicamente a
ISIS.
La mayor parte del armamento y
equipos de ISIS son del material de guerra que suministramos a nuestros
"aliados". Con estos aliados no creo que necesitamos
enemigos.
Una pregunta inocentes que se
nos ocurre es,
¿Por qué no está Israel en la alianza contra
el ISIS?
Los enemigos de nuestros
aliados, no pueden ser nuestros aliados. Simplemente es algo aberrante que
no funciona.
El Saludo cafeinado de Obama
Presidente Obama
bajó de “Marine One” con una
taza de café en su mano derecha a su regreso de las Naciones Unidas sobre
cambio climático y dirección de ataques aéreos en Siria, respondiendo el saludo
militar a los Marines que lo esperaba sin soltar la taza de café...
La casa blanca publicó un video para las organizaciones
como ABC News que informó sobre el saludo apodándolo como el "Saludo de
café con leche" y "Semper Latte" por la Washington Times, parodiando el lema de los marines
"Semper Fidelis".
El saludo de Obama con el café ha traído comentarios
mundiales. Pero yo he observado algo más sobre el saludo que la mayoría de los
comentaristas no han notado.
Esto es porque tengo algo en común con los presidentes
Bill Clinton y Barack Hussein Obama.
No soy izquierdista, pero tengo algo en común con
esos presidentes izquierdistas, y es que prefiero usar mi mano izquierda a la
derecha. Como ellos yo también soy zurdo.
Al igual que Obama, tomo agua, cerveza o café con mi mano
izquierda.
Si observan el video del incidente, pueden observar
varias cosas. Primero la mirada
de desprecio a los militares. No miró a los militares cuando bajaba del avión ni cuando
saludaba- En el epitome del desprecio miraba para el suelo cuando saludó con su
cafe con leche..
Levaba el café en su mano derecha de saludar.
Sin lugar a dudas estoy convencido que esto no es un
accidente involuntario, es un acto de desprecio estudiado para denigrar a los
militares que han criticado su política de no poner tropas en el terreno. Algo que todos los militares le han recomendado.
Si presionan este link, pueden ver la acción en su
totalidad, se puede ver su mirada y como no saluda respetuosamente. Did Obama serve up a coffee cup-salute
snafu to Marines?
Como zurdo puedo estar convencido que
Obama no llevaba la copa en la izquierda pero en su mano derecha, contra su
intuición natural de zurdo, por alguna razón ulterior, no puede ser de
otra manera. Pueden ver
otras fotos de Obama tomando cerveza o café con la mano izquierda, como lo
hacemos todos los zurdos- Siempre he pensado que es mejor ser zurdo
derecho que diestro siniestro, pero en este es un caso de un zurdo haciendo
algo que me parece muy siniestro.
PREDICCIONES DEL FIN DEL MUNDO
La NASA predice que meteorito colisionará
con la tierra en Marzo del 2880
(LA MIA ES
GARANTIZADA)
Quiero predecir que el próximo 31 de
diciembre del 1914, no se acabará el mundo.
Las
predicciones de Al Gore, en su libro una verdad incómoda; en
realidad, son unas mentiras interesada. Si existe el cambio climático tal como
nos lo presentan, no es culpa del hombre ni hay nada que podamos hacer para
evitarlo.
Pero Al
Gore que nunca ha sido gran cosa como político y no tiene nada de físico, ha
ganado millones con su libro controversial.
En el
proceso es el gurú que nos producen esas manifestaciones que hacen tanta bulla,
que interrumpen el tráfico y ayudan a que Obama no tenga que hablar de los
problemas económicos y del medio oriente.
Ahora
parece que un meteorólogo francés había anunciado que este año debido al cambio
climático, no íbamos tener verano tal como lo conocemos, es decir temperaturas
altas y pocas lluvias.
Bueno es
verdad hubo pocas lluvias y temperaturas altas, solamente se equivocó en el
orden de los factores.
Vamos
a ver si ahora predicen que vamos a poder ir a la playa en el invierno en
Alaska.
¿Realmente
hubiéramos necesitado preocuparnos por una gran tormenta solar que quemaría los
sistemas eléctricos de la mitad del planeta en el 2013?
Autoridades
científicas con bata blanca, y cara seria nos anunciaron graves
advertencias de muerte inminente, un emocionante enemigo nuclear en el espacio
desde la perspectiva científica. ¡Llamaradas solares!
Al
parecer, la preocupación se basaba en que en el año 2013, el sol llegaba a una
etapa de su ciclo natural durante la cual estos grandes eventos (llamaradas y
tormentas) son más probables.
Esto
puede parecerle un poco extraño, si usted probablemente ha oído hablar (como
yo) sobre una especial actividad solar que ha sido notable este último medio
siglo, más o menos, y que se espera que disminuya considerablemente
(posiblemente hasta desaparecer) en los próximos dos años.
Pero no importa,
es emocionante hablar sobre cómo y cuándo se acabará el mundo.
La NASA,
después de haber “sobrevivido” varias predicciones sobre el supuesto fin del
mundo, nos dice ahora que la tierra vuelve a verse amenazada, esta vez por un
asteroide de 1.1 kilómetro de diámetro.
Se trata
del asteroide 1950 AD, que ha sido observado por la Nasa durante más de medio
siglo y que se encuentra en camino hacia la Tierra. El cuerpo celeste podría
colisionar con nuestro planeta exactamente el 16 de marzo de 2880.
El
asteroide es una roca de 1,1 kilómetros de diámetro que viaja a una velocidad
de 15 km por segundo respecto a la Tierra.
Según los
cálculos de la agencia espacial estadounidense, el 1950 DA podría
estrellarse en el continente Africano a 60.000 km/h, causando una explosión
equivalente a 44.800 megatoneladas de TNT.
Bueno
vamos a esperar a marzo del 2880, tenemos que acordarnos de no viajar a África
ese año.
Creo que
esta vez la NASA está jugando al seguro para no equivocarse otra vez,
considerando el hecho que los que lean su anuncio no se acordarán de esto en el
2880. Aunque yo me encuentro un poco preocupado por los habitantes
de África aunque hubiera preferido que esto hubiera sucedido el 4 de Agosto de
1961 con el punto de colisión en Kenia.
A mí me
parece mejor predecir cuando no se acabará el mundo.
Quiero predecir que el próximo 31 de diciembre del
1914, no se acabará el mundo.
Es una
predicción mucho más exacta que la de los científicos, voy al seguro, si no se
acaba el mundo acertaré y si se acaba nadie se enterará porque no hay nadie en
el mundo.
Estrategia de Obama ante ISIS...Ganar las elecciones de Noviembre.
Una
resolución del Consejo de Derechos Humanos en julio sobre Gaza totalmente ha
ignorado a Hamas.
La misma
resolución criticó a Israel 18 veces.
Aunque
Jerusalén tomó medidas sin precedentes para evitar dañar a civiles, en
respuesta a los ataques de misiles de Hamas.
Lo que se
revela no es una visión del mundo desequilibrada, va más allá, es una perspectiva
peligrosa que se hace la vista gorda con el terrorismo de Hamas.
Durante
seis años, Estados Unidos ha mantenido una postura pasiva sobre esta tolerancia
imperdonable a Hamas como miembro del Consejo de derechos humanos un consejo
que incluye a Cuba, China y Rusia países que no respetan los derechos humanos.
Esto ya
no es imprudente. Es intolerable.
En las
semanas después de que terroristas atacaron el World Trade Center y el
Pentágono, el Presidente George W Bush sin importarle lo que pensaban de él
políticamente actuó.
Nuestros
enemigos lo criticaban pero sobre todo lo respetaban. La estrategia de
Bush no fue sólo la invasión de Iraq o de Afganistán, el departamento de
seguiridad que creó, con su vigilancia evitó y ha evitado otro ataque interno
en los Estados Unidos como el del 9-11, pero bajo esta administración el
peligro de nuevo aumenta..
Barack
Obama, quien ganó la Presidencia en gran parte porque él decía que no era
George Bush, y prometió lograr la paz en el Medio Oriente, y establecer lo que
el llamaba un “respeto” a los Estados Unidos, quiere aparecer lo que
sus electores estaban buscando desesperadamente — un presidente nacional
preocupado con la gran política exterior y asuntos de seguridad nacional. Pero
cada día que pasa la realidad de su incompetencia, o quizás su agenda, y sus
resultados se hacen más visible para todos, hasta para algunos de su mismo
partido.
Se puede
ver en sus ojos, su voz, su lenguaje corporal, en la falta de
convicción en sus palabras.
La razón
por la que no existe ninguna estrategia real, como dijo, acerca de los
terroristas islamistas es que sus “cerebros” — Valerie Jarrett y personas clave
en su Consejo de seguridad nacional que se supone que están calificados
para asesorarlo en temas de seguridad-; se centran más en los asuntos internos
de la política doméstica, ignorando el peligro de los terroristas. Sólo actúa
según soplan los vientos de las encuestas que pudieran afectar su posición en
las elecciones parciales del Senado.
Por esto
es que, el día en que ISIS decapitó al periodista Steven Sotloff, vemos a Obama
en Wisconsin, hablando ante de 6.000 miembros de la Unión, predicando en el
estilo de campaña política, hablando no de ISIS pero de los Republicanos como
los opositores de todo lo que él quiere hacer como si realmente él estuviera
haciendo algo que no fuera política doméstica.
Estaba en
su elemento, con miles de seguidores extasiados en cada palabra. No hay
preguntas, no hay especulación, no hay rendición de cuentas, no hay una
situación "difícil" — sólo adulación.
Veinticuatro
horas más tarde, él ignoró preguntas de los periodistas sobre la matanza
de Sotloff y abordó el Air Force One para Estonia, donde tomó dos preguntas
acerca de ISIS, y evadió responder más preguntas, no ofreció nada con claridad.
Fríamente y sin apasionamiento, resumió su estrategia como ISIS un
"problema manejable".
Obama ha
creado un estilo que tiende a fusionar su modo campaña con su modo
de gobernar, sigue siendo el candidato no el presidente. El departamento
de información del Departamento de estado ha convertido en un departamento
de defensa diaria del Presidente, una agencia de publicidad de Obama, excusando
sus acciones o la falta de ellas..
El
Presidente Obama no muestra absolutamente ningún deseo de resolver los problemas
que nos acosan, ya sea inmigración o el terrorismo, se presenta sin
voluntad de hacer lo que debe hacer; hasta ahora, la única voluntad que ha
mostrado es a partir de una amenaza presente en el camino, no la amenaza de los
terroristas, pero la amenaza de las elecciones legislativas para no perder la
mayoría del Senado.
Puede
tomar algunas decisiones cosméticas, pero abordar la amenaza de ISIS en una
manera que logre un fin estratégico para derrotarlo, no es el camino de Obama.
Estas desiciones pueden bajar y subir como un cachumbambé segun las encuestas,
porque su desición no es la de un líder pero de un pollítico interesado en
ganar unas elecciones. Esto es evidente tanto en el terrorismo como en el
caso de inmigración en que un día promete a los inmigrantes amnistía general y
el próximo día dice que hay que esperar ´hasta después de las elecciones.
Todo es dependiente no de una administración del país pero de ganar unas
elecciones.
Ahora en
las declaraciones de hoy aparece como un guerrero determinado a terminar con
ISIS, pero esto puede cambiar mañana si las encuestas dicen lo contrario.
El
elemento evidente de lo que estamos viendo de este presidente es que según las
condiciones puede llegar a una parálisis de decisión táctica. Todo es posible
ante este presidente movido simplemente por sus ambiciones políticas, todo
depende de las encuestas de opinión para las elecciones..
Y si eso
llega a ser parálisis de decisión estratégica, ¿qué pasará con nuestra
seguridad nacional? ¿Eso contribuirá a otro 9/11?
Esto es
algo que todos los que se preocupan por la situación consideran posible,
incluyendo el pentágono.
Si
miramos a nuestra frontera sur: ISIS tiene el deseo y los medios
para entrar en la nación, y los cárteles de la droga los ayudarán, Obama con su
sube y baja en las desiciones migratorias los ayuda al mantener paralizada la
seguirdad de las fronteras..
Nos
estamos quedando sin tiempo ni espacio; No es suficiente bombardear a ISIS en
el Medio Oriente, hay que tomar medidas en nuestro suelo, ellos ya están
aquí, lo dicen todas las agencias de seguiridad. No es inconcebible que
ISIS realice ataques contra nuestras grandes ciudades. Como Nueva York, Boston,
Chicago o Washington — o, aún peor, a las cuatro al mismo tiempo. ISIS
tiene mucho más poder y recursos que los que tenía Osama Bin Ladin en el
2001.
Si
aumenta los bombardeos sin cuidar al enemigo en nuestras ciudades, el remedio
es peor que la enfermedad y Obama sólo responderá a un ataque después de
ocurra, porque no es políticamente correcto la represión contra los musulmanes
en nuestro país.
Lo que
necesitamos es un liderazgo para América. Lo que hemos estado recibiendo
es un tipo que puede dar un buen discurso divisivo sobre aumentar el salario
mínimo, o que actúe según soplen los vientos de las encuestas sobre el problema
migratorio, pero que no ofrece nada acerca de su estrategia para protegernos.
Terrorismo llena el Vacío de la Inercia
Este escrito de Nadia Schadlow, explica mucho mejor la paradoja de la
política exterior de Obama sobre lo que todos vemos pero no podemos poner en
palabras por nuestras limitaciones de conocimientos sobre la profundidad del tema.
Todos sabemos que Obama tiene una mentalidad de no hacer nada, lo cual lo
presenta como un pacifista. Pero
lo que Nadia Schadlow nos dice en su escrito es que la paradoja consiste, en
que no hacer nada, fuerza a hacer lo que está haciendo ahora. Tiene que usar la fuerza
obligatoriamente, precisamente porque no ha hecho nada.
La analista explica que hay un espacio entre la guerra y la paz. Un vacío que es lo que llenan los
terroristas. Si se hace lo
que ha hecho Obama que es no hacer nada, el espacio abierto a los terroristas
les da una fuerza para operar y entonces al final tiene que hacer algo que es
lo que está haciendo ahora con los bombardeos.
Pero como dice el artículo, “La mentalidad táctica que domina la toma de
decisiones de seguridad nacional da prioridad a los medios militares con fines
políticos y confunde la actividad (por ejemplo, el bombardeo de las posiciones
enemigas) con el progreso”.
No hay progreso con los bombardeos que ha sido una decisión con fines
políticos (las elecciones de Noviembre) porque donde hay que atacar al enemigo
es constantemente en su campo de batalla terrorista en este espacio entre la
guerra y la paz, ya sea en el exterior como en lo doméstico.
Pero el problema con la situación Islámica es que no es correctamente
político el atacar al enemigo hasta que no nos ataca directamente, porque
entonces se pierden los votos de los liberales que acusan la acción como
discriminación de grupo.
Entonces ellos operan sin consecuencias, en ese vacío entre la paz y la
guerra, y nos están ganando la batalla.
En otras palabras, el terrorismo llena el vacío de la inercia.
Aquí el artículo de Nadia Schadlow en el Journal de hoy…….
Paradoja
de política exterior de Obama
Estilo
operacional y perspectivas de la política exterior de la administración han
hecho uso del instrumento militar casi inevitable.
El
ccompromiso del Presidente Obama para reducir la dependencia de Estados Unidos
en el instrumento militar de la energía es bien sabido. Ha sido un tema
constante de su Presidencia — desde su primera campaña presidencial a través de
su discurso importante sobre política exterior en West Point a principios de
este año. Por lo tanto, resulta paradójico que el estilo operacional y
perspectivas de la política exterior de la administración han hecho uso del instrumento
militar casi inevitable.
Al
no comprender que el espacio entre la guerra y la paz no es vacía — pero
llenado con un paisaje político, económico y medidas de seguridad que requieren
una atención constante — la política exterior norteamericana corre el riesgo de
quedar reducida a un énfasis en el instrumento militar táctico y reactivo por
defecto.
La
mentalidad táctica que domina la toma de decisiones de seguridad nacional da
prioridad a los medios militares con fines políticos y confunde la actividad
(por ejemplo, el bombardeo de las posiciones enemigas) con el progreso.
Porque
el uso de la fuerza militar no está conectado a los planes operacionales para
la posterior consolidación política, Estados Unidos desocupa el espacio entre
la guerra y la paz. Y porque directamente no coinciden con el poder militar
estadounidense, es en este espacio — los campos de batalla de la percepción, la
coerción, la atrocidad en masa — en
la que prefieren operar enemigos y adversarios de Estados Unidos.
El mensaje del
Presidente Barack Obama
El mensaje del Presidente Barack Obama sobre el estado
islámico de Irak y el Levante sigue siendo un enredo de alto perfil.
El pasado miércoles, Obama y otros funcionarios de la
administración luchaban para definir la meta. En una conferencia de prensa en
Estonia, Obama declaró que su objetivo era "degradar y destruir
ISIL". Momentos más tarde, sin embargo, Obama dijo que le gustaría la
presión del grupo para hacerla "un problema manejable". Hoy dice que
va a bombardearlos hasta destruirlos, pero que no enviará tropas.
El mensaje es sólo el comienzo.
Cuando Obama se instala sobre una estrategia militar,
que tendrá que decidir si pedir autorización a Congreso en primer lugar, o
simplemente bombardea a Siria primero y le dará la noticia al Congreso más
tarde, tendrá que decidir lo que el público va a tolerar y lo que demócratas y
republicanos en realidad apoyarán.
El Presidente
Obama fue bombardeado en la prensa la semana pasada por lo que podría decirse
que fue la mayor metedura de pata en la historia de la humanidad.
Esto resume todo lo malo de su presidencia.
Fue también una de
esas "clásicas meteduras de pata" con una explicación
cantinflesca, tan confusa como la "metedura de pata" original..
Dijo que su
administración estaba examinando las opciones militares acerca de cómo tratar
ISIS en Siria y necesitaría un poco más tiempo antes de establecerse en el plan
apropiado y llevarlo a la opinión pública
Ahora presenta su
“estrategia”. Qué payaso, con su plan de bombardeos que tardará tres años
en completarse, requiere un esfuerzo sostenido que podría durar hasta después
de Presidente Obama ha dejado oficina. La heurística simple
sugiere que si la propia administración dice que puede tardar tres años para
completar, probablemente terminará por tomar de siete a 154 años.
¿Estamos todos
contentos ahora? Ya nos dijo su estrategia.
Los Estados Unidos
están empantanados en una intervención militar repartida en varios países sin
tropas en el terreno eso es específicamente lo que propone.
Obama ha tomado el
despliegue de tropas terrestres fuera de la mesa. ¿Una larga guerra
contra ISIS, sin tropas?
La noticia sobre una intervención militar prolongada
de Medio Oriente es una preocupación por la falta de liderazgo del Presidente
Obama y la falta del establecimiento de prioridades poniendo la
política por encima de todo
La promesa de Obama
de no desplegar tropas terrestres ofrece una ventaja para el enemigo, que ahora
tienen una visión concreta del límite de determinación americana y puede
planificar en consecuencia
En cuanto a si la decisión de Obama de terreno tropas
fuera de la mesa es "política", bueno, ya lo vimos con
la decisión este fin de semana a retrasar la amnistía a los
inmigrantes indocumentados hasta después de las elecciones de Noviembre.
Esto indica que este presidente es ciertamente
políticamente flexible. Incluso si "sólo" para proporcionar apoyo
aéreo, lo cual también podrá crear una situación de dependencia de la cual
cualquier salida se convierte en algo muy difícil.
Splain…a combining form extracted from
“mansplain”.
Meaning “to explain or comment on something in
a condescending, overconfident, and often
inaccurate or oversimplified manner, from theperspective of the group one identifies with,”
As
bloody bodies and smoke rise into the air after a cry of Allahu Akbar and a
bomb detonation, each Muslim terrorist attack is followed by
"Muslimsplaining" why the latest act of Islamic violence had nothing
to do with Islam.
Sometimes the Muslimsplainers are Muslims. Often they aren't even Muslims.
When Boko Haram, an Islamic terrorist group aligned with Al Qaeda, kidnapped Nigerian girls, the media's Muslimsplainers sprang into action to explain why it had nothing to do with Islam.
Time featured "5 Reasons Boko Haram is Un-Islamic"; a listicle friendly article from one of those non-Muslim experts on why Islam is feminist .
"With their sustained campaign of murders and kidnappings, the members of Boko Haram conduct themselves in a manner that could barely be more alien to the Prophet Muhammad teachings," the article claimed. Mohammed spread Islam through a sustained campaign of murders and kidnappings. Claiming that murder was alien to Mohammed is like claiming that pledge drives are alien to PBS.
As proof, Time cited a statement from Saudi Arabia’s grand mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz al-Sheikh that Boko Haram was “set up to smear the image of Islam.”
This is the same Sheikh al-Sheikh who called for destroying all the churches in the region and marrying off 10-year-old girls. Destroying churches and raping schoolgirls is exactly what Boko Haram stands for. If you believe the media, the same grand mufti who supports raping children in Saudi Arabia as Islamic... opposes raping them in Nigeria as un-Islamic.
Either the Sheikh places a higher value on Nigerian girls than Saudi girls or like Mohammed, he considers all women "deficient in intelligence and religion", "harmful to men" and destined for hell.
The only reason the double Sheikh who speaks out of both sides of his mouth denounces Boko Haram and other Al Qaeda groups is because he is a mouthpiece for the Saudi ruling family which opposes them.
Saudi Arabia isn't opposed to ISIS because it’s un-Islamic. It's opposed to ISIS because the Islamic group wants to replace the House of Saud, upsetting the deal between Wahhab and Saud that created a balance between the tyrannical royal family and the mosque.
Saudi Arabia and its mouthpieces don't oppose ISIS because it's un-Islamic. They oppose it because it's too Islamic for them.
Muslimsplaining by non-Muslims is dishonest. Time claims that Mohammed opposed harming women and other non-combatants when he and his men enslaved and raped captured women. It claims that Islam opposes forcibly marrying off underage girls, when Mohammed married an underage girl and the very Muslim religious leader quoted by Time in its introduction supports it.
Time claims that Boko Haram's war against Christians is un-Islamic and yet the Saudi grand mufti it cites who called for the destruction of Christian churches based his demand on Mohammed's deathbed statement, "Two religions shall not co-exist in the Arabian Peninsula."
If we are to believe Time, not only is Boko Haram un-Islamic but so is the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia that Time quoted to prove Boko Haram is un-Islamic.
And so is Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam.
If Mohammed is un-Islamic because he raped girls, enslaved women and murdered religious minorities in a campaign of violence and slavery... is there even an Islam?
Either Mohammed, the founder of Islam, is un-Islamic so that Islam, as defined by the Muslimsplainers, doesn't exist. Or the Muslimsplainers are lying about Islam.
Muslim countries are some of the world's most religiously intolerant places and they are also the places most likely to treat women and girls like dirt. You can either believe the independent statistics, the quotes from Muslim clerics and from Mohammed... or the Muslimsplainers who claim that the condemnation of Boko Haram by a totalitarian Islamic country whose religious police shoved schoolgirlsback to die in a burning building because their hair wasn't covered proves that the group has nothing in common with the moderate form of Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia and by its international gang of clerics.
Sometimes the Muslimsplainers are Muslims. Often they aren't even Muslims.
When Boko Haram, an Islamic terrorist group aligned with Al Qaeda, kidnapped Nigerian girls, the media's Muslimsplainers sprang into action to explain why it had nothing to do with Islam.
Time featured "5 Reasons Boko Haram is Un-Islamic"; a listicle friendly article from one of those non-Muslim experts on why Islam is feminist .
"With their sustained campaign of murders and kidnappings, the members of Boko Haram conduct themselves in a manner that could barely be more alien to the Prophet Muhammad teachings," the article claimed. Mohammed spread Islam through a sustained campaign of murders and kidnappings. Claiming that murder was alien to Mohammed is like claiming that pledge drives are alien to PBS.
As proof, Time cited a statement from Saudi Arabia’s grand mufti, Sheikh Abdulaziz al-Sheikh that Boko Haram was “set up to smear the image of Islam.”
This is the same Sheikh al-Sheikh who called for destroying all the churches in the region and marrying off 10-year-old girls. Destroying churches and raping schoolgirls is exactly what Boko Haram stands for. If you believe the media, the same grand mufti who supports raping children in Saudi Arabia as Islamic... opposes raping them in Nigeria as un-Islamic.
Either the Sheikh places a higher value on Nigerian girls than Saudi girls or like Mohammed, he considers all women "deficient in intelligence and religion", "harmful to men" and destined for hell.
The only reason the double Sheikh who speaks out of both sides of his mouth denounces Boko Haram and other Al Qaeda groups is because he is a mouthpiece for the Saudi ruling family which opposes them.
Saudi Arabia isn't opposed to ISIS because it’s un-Islamic. It's opposed to ISIS because the Islamic group wants to replace the House of Saud, upsetting the deal between Wahhab and Saud that created a balance between the tyrannical royal family and the mosque.
Saudi Arabia and its mouthpieces don't oppose ISIS because it's un-Islamic. They oppose it because it's too Islamic for them.
Muslimsplaining by non-Muslims is dishonest. Time claims that Mohammed opposed harming women and other non-combatants when he and his men enslaved and raped captured women. It claims that Islam opposes forcibly marrying off underage girls, when Mohammed married an underage girl and the very Muslim religious leader quoted by Time in its introduction supports it.
Time claims that Boko Haram's war against Christians is un-Islamic and yet the Saudi grand mufti it cites who called for the destruction of Christian churches based his demand on Mohammed's deathbed statement, "Two religions shall not co-exist in the Arabian Peninsula."
If we are to believe Time, not only is Boko Haram un-Islamic but so is the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia that Time quoted to prove Boko Haram is un-Islamic.
And so is Mohammed, the Prophet of Islam.
If Mohammed is un-Islamic because he raped girls, enslaved women and murdered religious minorities in a campaign of violence and slavery... is there even an Islam?
Either Mohammed, the founder of Islam, is un-Islamic so that Islam, as defined by the Muslimsplainers, doesn't exist. Or the Muslimsplainers are lying about Islam.
Muslim countries are some of the world's most religiously intolerant places and they are also the places most likely to treat women and girls like dirt. You can either believe the independent statistics, the quotes from Muslim clerics and from Mohammed... or the Muslimsplainers who claim that the condemnation of Boko Haram by a totalitarian Islamic country whose religious police shoved schoolgirlsback to die in a burning building because their hair wasn't covered proves that the group has nothing in common with the moderate form of Islam practiced in Saudi Arabia and by its international gang of clerics.
Is
the real Islam to be found in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt or
is it to be found in mainstream media Muslimsplaining articles which act as if
real life in Muslim countries and the actions of the Prophet of Islam have
nothing to do with Islam and can be waved away with a listicle?
Muslimsplaining by Muslims is even more offensive to the victims of Islam.
CAIR, an organization linked to terrorism, insisted that the 9/11 Museum censor mentions of Islam.
Muslimsplaining by Muslims is even more offensive to the victims of Islam.
CAIR, an organization linked to terrorism, insisted that the 9/11 Museum censor mentions of Islam.
Essays
Muslimsplain to the victims that the religion in whose name their friends and
relatives were killed had nothing to do with killing them and that the feelings
of that religion matter more than their sorrow or the truth.
Muslims insist on constructing a Ground Zero Mosque and Museum of Islam while their own "moderate" religious leaders call for destroying all the churches in the Arabian peninsula.
Sheikh Mostafa Elazabawy of the Masjid Manhattan mosque resigned from the interfaith advisory panel to the 9/11 Museum and warned that the movie would offend Muslims. “Unsophisticated visitors who do not understand the difference between Al Qaeda, ISIS and Muslims may come away with a prejudiced view of Islam."
What is the actual difference between ISIS and Islam? It's best not to ask Sheikh Elazabawy who called Jews a "cancer" and accused them of killing all the prophets. CAIR staged a press conference protesting the film at which a speaker accused the Jews of killing Jesus.
It's the same rhetoric that Muslim terrorist groups have used. Muslimsplainers like Sheikh Elazabawy warn Americans against offending Muslims by implying that ISIS is Islamic even as they talk like ISIS. Muslimsplainers want tolerance, but they aren't willing to give it in return. They aren't calling for tolerance, but carving out spaces of Muslim privilege.
That's not fundamentally different than what Islamic supremacist groups like ISIS do. The only difference between Muslim supremacist "moderates" and "extremists" is that the extremists are honest about their supremacism while the moderates hide behind tolerance.
"The film ignorantly implies a religion, rather than a group of criminals, was to blame for the September 11 attacks," CAIR insisted.
Criminals don't commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. Criminals seek to profit from their crimes. The 9/11 hijackers were not criminals. They weren't robbing the World Trade Center. They were trying to kill as many non-Muslims as possible in the name of Islam. They were willing to die because they believed that they would be reborn in a paradise filled with eternal virgins and young boys serving wine. They believed that they would be able to murder, die and profit because of Islam.
The checklist for the 9/11 hijackers told them to read the Koran into their hands and touch their knives and passports to endow them with magic Koran powers. It promised them that airport security would not stop them except through the will of Allah. When they attacked, they were urged to shout praises of Allah and to remember that, "the women of paradise are waiting."
"Strike for Allah's sake," the 9/11 hijackers were told. "Implement the way of the prophet in taking prisoners. Take prisoners and kill them. As Allah said: 'No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood'".
These aren't the words of criminals. They are the motives of religiously devout men who worship death and killing. Censoring references to Islam from the 9/11 Museum would be like eliminating all mentions of National Socialism from a Holocaust museum.
It's not an act of tolerance because it lies by omission and that perpetuates the intolerance of the ideology responsible for the atrocity.
Do the Muslimsplainers of CAIR really believe that ISIS is a gang of criminals? Every leader of ISIS has been a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Under its current leadership, ISIS is effectively a splinter group of the Muslim BrotherhoodCAIR has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It also has a history of supporting another Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group, Hamas.
Does CAIR really believe that when one Muslim Brotherhood linked terrorist group massacres civilians it's a gang of criminals, but when another Muslim Brotherhood linked terrorist group does it they are good Muslims?
Nihad Awad, the founder and executive director of CAIR, said, "I am in support of the Hamas movement."
ISIS has urged support for Hamas and Hamas responded to the death of Osama bin Laden by saying, "We condemn the assassination of a Muslim and Arab warrior and we pray to Allah that his soul rests in peace. We regard this as the continuation of the American oppression and shedding of blood of Muslims and Arabs."
CAIR supports Hamas. Hamas supported Al Qaeda. Supports ISIS, yet the Muslimsplainers at CAIR would like us to believe that they don't support Al Qaeda, even though it's a branch of the same Muslim Brotherhood tree. CAIR even took money from an ISIS linked front group. But CAIR would also like us to believe that any association between Al Qaeda and Islam was made up by Islamophobes.
If ISIS is a gang of un-Islamic criminals, then Hamas, which supports ISIS, is also an un-Islamic gang of criminals. That means that we can't believe anything that CAIR says about Islam because it is, by its own admission, an un-Islamic gang of criminals
Since virtually every Muslim organization in this country is interlinked with CAIR, they too are un-Islamic gangs of criminals and we should ignore anything they say about Islam.
Now that the official Muslimsplainers have all outed themselves as un-Islamic criminals maybe we can have an honest discussion about Islam. And that discussion must begin by acknowledging that religious tolerance and respect for the rights of women are un-Islamic.
It's either that or believe that Al Qaeda and Boko Haram, not to mention Pakistan, Iran, Saudi
Arabia, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, with a combined population of about half-a-billion Muslims, are all un-Islamic. And then where are we to find any actual Muslims except the hypothetical ones in Muslimsplaining mainstream media articles?
Either the Muslimsplainers are right and real Islam, like real Communism, doesn't actually exist in any Muslim country on earth, or they're wrong and real Islam is what we're dealing with here. It isn't a gang of un-Islamic criminals kidnapping schoolgirls, blowing up churches, flying planes into buildings, beheading prisoners and murdering people over Mohammed cartoons.
It's Islam.
The Muslimsplainers insult our intelligence and the countless victims of the Jihad from Africa to Asia, across the Middle East and in Europe and the United States, with their lies. If any of them really oppose Islamic terrorism, then they need to realize that lying about what it is won't make it go away. And those Muslimsplainers who claim not to support terrorists, but only support the terrorists who support the other terrorists, aren't the solution, they're the problem.
We can't expect them to tell the truth. But we should tell the truth about them
Muslims insist on constructing a Ground Zero Mosque and Museum of Islam while their own "moderate" religious leaders call for destroying all the churches in the Arabian peninsula.
Sheikh Mostafa Elazabawy of the Masjid Manhattan mosque resigned from the interfaith advisory panel to the 9/11 Museum and warned that the movie would offend Muslims. “Unsophisticated visitors who do not understand the difference between Al Qaeda, ISIS and Muslims may come away with a prejudiced view of Islam."
What is the actual difference between ISIS and Islam? It's best not to ask Sheikh Elazabawy who called Jews a "cancer" and accused them of killing all the prophets. CAIR staged a press conference protesting the film at which a speaker accused the Jews of killing Jesus.
It's the same rhetoric that Muslim terrorist groups have used. Muslimsplainers like Sheikh Elazabawy warn Americans against offending Muslims by implying that ISIS is Islamic even as they talk like ISIS. Muslimsplainers want tolerance, but they aren't willing to give it in return. They aren't calling for tolerance, but carving out spaces of Muslim privilege.
That's not fundamentally different than what Islamic supremacist groups like ISIS do. The only difference between Muslim supremacist "moderates" and "extremists" is that the extremists are honest about their supremacism while the moderates hide behind tolerance.
"The film ignorantly implies a religion, rather than a group of criminals, was to blame for the September 11 attacks," CAIR insisted.
Criminals don't commit suicide by flying planes into buildings. Criminals seek to profit from their crimes. The 9/11 hijackers were not criminals. They weren't robbing the World Trade Center. They were trying to kill as many non-Muslims as possible in the name of Islam. They were willing to die because they believed that they would be reborn in a paradise filled with eternal virgins and young boys serving wine. They believed that they would be able to murder, die and profit because of Islam.
The checklist for the 9/11 hijackers told them to read the Koran into their hands and touch their knives and passports to endow them with magic Koran powers. It promised them that airport security would not stop them except through the will of Allah. When they attacked, they were urged to shout praises of Allah and to remember that, "the women of paradise are waiting."
"Strike for Allah's sake," the 9/11 hijackers were told. "Implement the way of the prophet in taking prisoners. Take prisoners and kill them. As Allah said: 'No prophet should have prisoners until he has soaked the land with blood'".
These aren't the words of criminals. They are the motives of religiously devout men who worship death and killing. Censoring references to Islam from the 9/11 Museum would be like eliminating all mentions of National Socialism from a Holocaust museum.
It's not an act of tolerance because it lies by omission and that perpetuates the intolerance of the ideology responsible for the atrocity.
Do the Muslimsplainers of CAIR really believe that ISIS is a gang of criminals? Every leader of ISIS has been a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. Under its current leadership, ISIS is effectively a splinter group of the Muslim BrotherhoodCAIR has close ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. It also has a history of supporting another Muslim Brotherhood terrorist group, Hamas.
Does CAIR really believe that when one Muslim Brotherhood linked terrorist group massacres civilians it's a gang of criminals, but when another Muslim Brotherhood linked terrorist group does it they are good Muslims?
Nihad Awad, the founder and executive director of CAIR, said, "I am in support of the Hamas movement."
ISIS has urged support for Hamas and Hamas responded to the death of Osama bin Laden by saying, "We condemn the assassination of a Muslim and Arab warrior and we pray to Allah that his soul rests in peace. We regard this as the continuation of the American oppression and shedding of blood of Muslims and Arabs."
CAIR supports Hamas. Hamas supported Al Qaeda. Supports ISIS, yet the Muslimsplainers at CAIR would like us to believe that they don't support Al Qaeda, even though it's a branch of the same Muslim Brotherhood tree. CAIR even took money from an ISIS linked front group. But CAIR would also like us to believe that any association between Al Qaeda and Islam was made up by Islamophobes.
If ISIS is a gang of un-Islamic criminals, then Hamas, which supports ISIS, is also an un-Islamic gang of criminals. That means that we can't believe anything that CAIR says about Islam because it is, by its own admission, an un-Islamic gang of criminals
Since virtually every Muslim organization in this country is interlinked with CAIR, they too are un-Islamic gangs of criminals and we should ignore anything they say about Islam.
Now that the official Muslimsplainers have all outed themselves as un-Islamic criminals maybe we can have an honest discussion about Islam. And that discussion must begin by acknowledging that religious tolerance and respect for the rights of women are un-Islamic.
It's either that or believe that Al Qaeda and Boko Haram, not to mention Pakistan, Iran, Saudi
Arabia, Afghanistan, Indonesia, Kuwait, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, with a combined population of about half-a-billion Muslims, are all un-Islamic. And then where are we to find any actual Muslims except the hypothetical ones in Muslimsplaining mainstream media articles?
Either the Muslimsplainers are right and real Islam, like real Communism, doesn't actually exist in any Muslim country on earth, or they're wrong and real Islam is what we're dealing with here. It isn't a gang of un-Islamic criminals kidnapping schoolgirls, blowing up churches, flying planes into buildings, beheading prisoners and murdering people over Mohammed cartoons.
It's Islam.
The Muslimsplainers insult our intelligence and the countless victims of the Jihad from Africa to Asia, across the Middle East and in Europe and the United States, with their lies. If any of them really oppose Islamic terrorism, then they need to realize that lying about what it is won't make it go away. And those Muslimsplainers who claim not to support terrorists, but only support the terrorists who support the other terrorists, aren't the solution, they're the problem.
We can't expect them to tell the truth. But we should tell the truth about them
Conquest of América-A simple strategy
Does it sound familiar?
1.
Terminate America's freedom of speech by replacing it
with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.
with statewide and nationwide hate-crime bills.
2.
Wage a war of words using black leaders like Louis
Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson or Obama’s old church pastor Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., screaming "God damn America!" from the pulpit and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of
African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they
fail to tell African-Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and
sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same,
''Abed.''
Farrakhan, Rev. Jesse Jackson or Obama’s old church pastor Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., screaming "God damn America!" from the pulpit and other visible religious personalities who promote Islam as the religion of
African-Americans while insisting Christianity is for whites only. What they
fail to tell African-Americans is that it was Arab Muslims who captured them and
sold them as slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for black and slave is the same,
''Abed.''
3.
Engage the American public in dialogues, discussions,
debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and
mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another
religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.
debates in colleges, universities, public libraries, radio, TV, churches and
mosques on the virtues of Islam. Proclaim how it is historically another
religion like Judaism and Christianity with the same monotheistic faith.
4.
Nominate Muslim sympathizers to political office to
bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential
sympathizers by block voting.
bring about favorable legislation toward Islam and support potential
sympathizers by block voting.
5.
Take control of as much of Hollywood, the press, TV,
radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corportations or a controlling stock.
radio and the Internet as possible by buying the related corportations or a controlling stock.
6.
Yield to the fear of the imminent shut-off of the
lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41
percent of it comes from the Middle East.
lifeblood of America – black gold. America’s economy depends on oil and 41
percent of it comes from the Middle East.
7.
Yell ''foul, out-of-context, personal interpretation,
hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran''
anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.
hate crime, Zionist, un- American, inaccurate interpretation of the Quran''
anytime Islam is criticized or the Quran is analyzed in the public arena.
8.
Encourage Muslims to penetrate the White House,
specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture
of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school
boards. Train Muslims a medical doctors
to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical l companies
(Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries
need them more desperately than America?) Take over the computer industry.
Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of
Islamization in a discreet way.
specifically with Islamists who can articulate a marvelous and peaceful picture
of Islam. Acquire government positions and get membership in local school
boards. Train Muslims a medical doctors
to dominate the medical field, research and pharmaceutical l companies
(Ever notice how numerous Muslim doctors in America are, when their countries
need them more desperately than America?) Take over the computer industry.
Establish Middle Eastern restaurants throughout the U.S. to connect planners of
Islamization in a discreet way.
9.
Accelerate Islamic demographic growth via:
Massive
immigration (100,000 annually since
1961).
1961).
Use
no birth control whatsoever – every baby of Muslim parents is
automatically a Muslim and cannot choose another religion
later.
later.
Muslim
men must marry American women and Islamize them
(10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one
can't legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in
America.
(10,000 annually). Then divorce them and remarry every five years – since one
can't legally marry four at one time. This is a legal solution in
America.
Convert
angry, alienated black inmates and turn them
into militants (so far 2,000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide).
Only a few ''sleeper cells'' have been captured in Afghanistan and on American
soil.
into militants (so far 2,000 released inmates have joined al-Qaida worldwide).
Only a few ''sleeper cells'' have been captured in Afghanistan and on American
soil.
10.
Reading, writing, arithmetic and research through the
American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be
sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are
currently 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the U.S. which teach loyalty to the
Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. In January of 2002, Saudi Arabia’s Embassy in Washington
mailed 4,500 packets of the Quran and videos promoting Islam to America's high
schools – free of charge. Saudi Arabia would not allow the U.S. to reciprocate.
American educational system, mosques and student centers (now 1,500) should be
sprinkled with dislike of Jews, evangelical Christians and democracy. There are
currently 300 exclusively Muslim schools in the U.S. which teach loyalty to the
Quran, not the U.S. Constitution. In January of 2002, Saudi Arabia’s Embassy in Washington
mailed 4,500 packets of the Quran and videos promoting Islam to America's high
schools – free of charge. Saudi Arabia would not allow the U.S. to reciprocate.
11.
Provide very sizeable monetary Muslim grants to
colleges and universities in America to establish ''Centers for Islamic
studies'' with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education
institutions.
colleges and universities in America to establish ''Centers for Islamic
studies'' with Muslim directors to promote Islam in higher-education
institutions.
12.
Let the entire world know through propaganda,
speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked
Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists.
speeches, seminars, local and national media that terrorists have hijacked
Islam, when in truth, Islam hijacked the terrorists.
13.
Appeal to the historically compassionate and
sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who
are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.
sensitive Americans for sympathy and tolerance towards Muslims in America who
are portrayed as mainly immigrants from oppressed countries.
14.
Nullify America's sense of security by manipulating
the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans
with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports,
apartment buildings and malls.
the intelligence community with misinformation. Periodically terrorize Americans
with reports of impending attacks on bridges, tunnels, water supplies, airports,
apartment buildings and malls.
15.
Form riots and demonstrations in the prison system
demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America's justice system.
demanding Islamic Sharia as the way of life, not America's justice system.
16.
Open numerous charities throughout the U.S., but use
the funds
to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.
the funds
to support Islamic terrorism with American dollars.
17.
Raise interest in Islam on America's campuses by
insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam.
insisting freshman take at least one course on Islam.
18.
Unify the numerous Muslim lobbies in Washington,
mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and
papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the
faith and engender news in the media.
mosques, Islamic student centers, educational organizations, magazines and
papers by Internet and an annual convention to coordinate plans, propagate the
faith and engender news in the media.
19.
Send intimidating messages and messengers to the outspoken individuals who are
critical of
Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.
Islam and seek to eliminate them by hook or crook.
20.
Applaud Muslims as loyal citizens of the U.S. by
spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and
ethic groups in America.
spotlighting their voting record as the highest percentage of all minority and
ethic groups in America.
LECCIÓN OLVIDADA Y ESCARNECIDA
Cuando exactamente
40 años atrás, el presidente Gerald Ford decidió extender un perdón
a Richard Nixon que había renunciado ante el escándalo de Watergate, dijo las
siguientes palabras “Que este perdón no sea causa para olvidar la
maldad del tipo de ofensas que se cometieron en Watergate, o que olvidemos la
lección que hemos aprendido”
¿Cuál fue la
ofensa de Nixon? Pues tratar de ocultar los tapes que lo implicaban
en el encubrimiento de los que trataron de robar documentación que probaba que
el candidato demócrata McGovern recibía contribución económica Fidel
Castro. Dada la poca posibilidad de elección de McGovern que se
probó después en las elecciones y el hecho de que no hay que robar documentos
para saber del contubernio de McGovern con Fidel, fue un error garrafal el
tanto el robo como la ocultación.
Pero lo que dijo
Ford tampoco se ha materializado. No solo no hemos aprendido la
lección, pero lo aberrante es que la lección se ha convertido en un chiste.
Ahora el IRS
oculta E Mails descaradamente, con la complicidad del presidente y el fiscal
general. Ni la prensa ni siquiera las cámaras legislativas consideran que esto
pudiera ser motivo de impugnación como fue en el caso de Nixon.
Cuando Watergate
fue un problema de abuso de la oficina de la presidencia, pero nadie
personalmente sufrió por este abuso. En este caso ciudadanos han
sido acosados y abusados por el IRS que oculta la documentación descaradamente
sin consecuencias.
Hemos cambiado,
siempre ha habido y habrá corrupción en el gobierno porque es una
institución humana. Pero el aceptar la maldad de la corrupción como un hecho no
condenable el bajar a un nivel que no es digno de esta nación.
El QUE CON
MUSULMANES SE ACUESTA…
Lyndon Larouche es un personaje que todos los de mi
edad, hemos tenido que
notar. El hecho que ha sido
candidato a presidente perennemente creo que por siete veces, la última en 2004
y sus alarmantes teorías conspirativas y catastróficas le han dado una
visibilidad imposible de ignorar.
Con sus 91 años, Larouche todavía está dando guerra,
tiene un sitio en la web LAROUCHEPAC.COM, en el que nos sigue dando noticias espectaculares.
Aunque Larouche es demócrata, siempre ha tenido
situaciones atravesadas con su partido, y hoy es una de las voces que pide la
impugnación de Obama.
Pero la teoría más controversial que tiene es que
acusa al gobierno de Arabia Saudita, que se supone que sea nuestro aliado, de
ser el culpable del ataque del 9-11 y de ser los que han creado y están
financiando a ISIS para el logro del Califato Mundial.
Lo que
he visto a través de los años de las teorías de Larouche, es que un 75% de
ellas no se materializan o no resultan ser verdad, pero esto deja un 25% que
han sido acertadas.
Aunque el promedio es bajo, el hombre tiene el bate en
la mano y siempre puede dar un hit.
En este caso de Arabia Saudita es algo controversial,
porque se supone que sea nuestro mejor aliado musulmán en la región. Pero la mayoría de los terroristas
vienen de Arabia Saudita, de donde era Osama Bin Ladin y de donde eran todos
los terroristas del 9-11.
Si analizamos que la religión oficial de Arabia
Saudita es el Islam, que fue instituido por Mahoma para la formación del Califato
Mundial, y que según las enseñanzas del profeta todo es permitido, hasta la
simulación y el engaño con tal de lograr el triunfo del Islam, la teoría de
Larouche pudiera ser o no ser verdad, pero no es del todo descabellada.
Otro asunto
misterioso con respecto a esta teoría es ¿De dónde saca ISIS tanto dinero?
Arabia Saudita es el país más rico de la región con
los Emiratos Árabes, también musulmanes.
El Islam es el enemigo, no un gobierno o un
líder. Cuando se derrocó a
Moammar Gadhafi, y cuando se crearon gobiernos “amigos” en Iraq, Afghanistán,
Egipto y otros países musulmanes, se habló de la “primavera árabe”. Pero lo que se ha logrado es un verano
islámico bien caliente.
Los nuevos líderes musulmanes de esos países se
muestran más enemigos de los Estados Unidos que los anteriores. En Libia nos matan a nuestro embajador
y nos sacan del país.
En Siria nos pusimos en contra de Assad, porque
dijimos que era un criminal pero descubrimos que da mismo ASAS QUE ISIS. y con el que se quede
nos vamos a joder.
Todos los musulmanes quieren literalmente arrancarles
la cabeza a todos los infieles.
Ahora Obama nos dice que donde dijo digo
dijo Diego y que tiene una
estrategia.
La estrategia es conseguir aliados musulmanes de la
región para derrotar los otros musulmanes más malos.
Quizás esos hijos del Islam pueda aliados del Barack
Hussein que es otro hijo del islam, pero no pueden ser aliados de la nación
infiel de Estados Unidos. No se lo permite su fe.
Mientras que dependamos de los hijos del Islam, no se
puede resolver la situación. Tanto aquí como allá. Todo lo que vemos es
violencia contra los Estados Unidos de los musulmanes
determinados a destruir a los infieles. Mientras tanto nuestro país
est dirigido por un presidente que estudió en escuelas musulmanas y se
crió con padres musulmanes. Que camina como un musulman habla como un musulmán
pero que dicen que es "cristiano" . Cuando buscamos la salida, donde quiera que
miremos sólo vemos musulmanes
COLUMNA DE RICARDO SAMITIER:
Puede
Alguien Explicarme… ¿Cual Es La Razón?
Que
Nadie Protesta La Celebración De Las Fiestas Religiosas
NO
CRISTIANAS…
Hoy
Es Rosh Hashanah… Ojala Todos los Judíos Tenga Feliz Fiesta.
Dentro
de Dos meses Veremos Las Protestas… Para Quitar Las
Cruces
De Las Navidades, De Los Uniformes, y Hasta De Los Monumentos…
Todas
las religiones pueden celebrar sus FIESTAS menos la Cristiana…
Por
Cierto La Cristiana Es La Creadora De La Civilización…
· La Primera Religión que Prohibió La
Esclavitud… aun
hoy el Corán Lo Permite…
· La “Liberación De la Mujer” fue GRACIAS y la Obra Silenciosa De La Virgen
Maria…
las religiones sin Vírgenes aún mantienen a las
mujeres ENCAPUCHADAS
Y SIN DERECHOS.
Los
Periódicos Socialistas y Pro-Homosexuales… en sus planes TRAIDORES esta reducir
la natalidad
Del
Occidente Cristiano… para que triunfe el “Nuevo Orden Mundial” vencido por el “VIENTRE DE
LAS
MUJERES MUSULMANAS…”
El ministro Galardón dimitió esta semana porque su partido formado por “POLITIQUEROS supuestamente
El ministro Galardón dimitió esta semana porque su partido formado por “POLITIQUEROS supuestamente
De
DERECHA” con
mayoría absoluta no quisieron quitar sino solo modificar la LEY CONTRA EL INFANTICIDIO
conocida
como el DERECHO
AL ABORTO.
Si los POLITIQUEROS que dicen ser de la derecha no tienen el valor de votar sus convicciones contra la
Si los POLITIQUEROS que dicen ser de la derecha no tienen el valor de votar sus convicciones contra la
presión
de la prensa pro
homosexual y comunista estamos perdidos!
Si Vacilan Por Miedo A La Prensa Imagínense Como Van A Responder
Si Vacilan Por Miedo A La Prensa Imagínense Como Van A Responder
Contra
La Invasión Musulmana Y El Dinero De Los Bancos!!
¿Obama Nos está embarcando?
Esta Bueno ya De SOPORTAR SUS
ORDENES… Que Ponen en PELIGRO REAL A Los Estados Unidos. Existen Ordenes Que No Se Pueden
Obedecer… Ciegamente…
Obama Dio La Orden De Traer A Todos Los Porta Aviones Al Mismo
Puerto…Mientras… Roosevelt Dio La Orden 48 Horas Antes Del Ataque A Perl
Harbor Que Los 3 Porta Aviones… Que
Entonces Tenía USA… Salieran URGENTEMENTE HACIA SAN DIEGO…
Todos los
Porta aviones JUNTOS…
PODÍAN SER
DESTRUIDOS DE UN GOLPE
GRACIAS A Obama… O A Los Militares Comprometidos Con El Socialismo…
The picture is of the five first line US nuclear carriers docked together in one place. Just like Battleship Row, Pearl Harbor , December 7, 1941.
This picture was taken the February 2014 in Norfolk , Virginia … Obama ordered 5 nuclear carriers into harbor for "routine" (?) inspections. Heads of the Navy were flabbergasted by the directive but had to comply as it was a direct order from their Commander-in-Chief.
The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role leaving our land forces naked and exposed!
NORFOLK, VA. (February 8, 2014). This is the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were docked together. USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), USS Enterprise (CVN 65), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) are all in port at Naval Station Norfolk , Va. , the world’s largest naval station.
Knowledgeable sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces.
(U..S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released).
Obama is ‘Commander in chief’.
This ordering of most of the Navy's capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor ! This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, why did the following happen? Is this a routine changing of the guard? Or what? I'm afraid of the "what"
Major General Paul Vallely (Ret):
This long list of senior military officers and one sergeant major
comes at no great surprise to me because of the direction this
country is heading.
Here is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:
Commanding Generals fired:
· General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012)
· Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013)
· Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013)
· Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013)
· Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011)
· Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013)
· General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013)
· Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point , NY (2013)
· Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013)
· General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013)
· Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico 's Security Battalion (Oct 2013)
· General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010)
· General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009)
· General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012)
· Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013)
· Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013)
· Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013)
· Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013)
Commanding Admirals fired:
· Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)
· Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2011)
· Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011)
· Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs , NY (Aug 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011)
· Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story , VA (Aug 2011)
· Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011)
· Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (Jun 2011)
· Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011)
· Commander Kevin Harms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln (Mar 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011)
· Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011)
· Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego
(Apr 2011)
· Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific
(Mar 2011)
· Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)
· Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011)
· Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota , U.S. Navy Commander Naval Activities Spain (Apr 2011)
· Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island , WA (Apr 2011)
· Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011)
· Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011)
· Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011)
· Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island , WA (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville , TN (Jul 2011)
· Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011)
· Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011)
· Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012):
· Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012)
· Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012)
· Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012)
· Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012)
· Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station's Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic (Sep 2012)
· Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Captain Daniel Dusek-U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme
· Commander David Faught-Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012)
· Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012)
· Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012)
· Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012)
· Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012)
· Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Commander Dennis Klein- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012)
· Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (Jun 2012)
· Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012)
· Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012)
· Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL (Nov 2012)
· Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012)
· Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxent River , MD (Jun 2012)
· Captain Jeffrey Riedel- Program manager, Littoral Combat Ship program (Jan 2012)
· Commander Sara Santoski- U.S. Navy Commander Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 15 (Sep 2012)
· Commander Kyle G. Strudthoff-Executive Officer Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25 (Sep 2012)
· Commander Sheryl Tannahill- U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Nashville , TN (Sep 2012)
· Commander Michael Ward- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Pittsburgh (Aug 2012)
· Captain Michael Wiegand- U.S. Navy Commander Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (Nov 2012)
· Captain Ted Williams- U.S. Navy Commander amphibious command ship Mount Whitney (Nov 2012)
· Commander Jeffrey Wissel- U.S. Navy Commander of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (Feb 2012)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2013):
· Lieutenant Commander Lauren Allen-Executive Officer submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
· Reserve Captain Jay Bowman-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Fort Dix , NJ (Mar 2013)
· Captain William Cogar-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Mercy's medical treatment facility (Sept 2013)
· Commander Steve Fuller-Executive Officer frigate Kauffman (Mar 2013)
· Captain Shawn Hendricks-Program Manager for naval enterprise IT networks (June 2013)
· Captain David Hunter-U.S. Navy Commander of Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 12 & Coastal Riverine Group 2 (Feb 2013)
· Captain Eric Johnson-U.S. Navy Chief of Military Entrance Processing Command at Great Lakes Naval Training Center, IL (2013)
· Captain Devon Jones-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Air Facility El Centro , CA (July 2013)
· Captain Kevin Knoop-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Comfort's medical treatment facility (Aug 2013)
· Lieutenant Commander Jack O'Neill-U.S. Navy Commander Operational Support Center Rock Island , IL (Mar 2013)
· Commander Allen Maestas-Executive Officer Beachmaster Unit 1 (May 2013)
· Commander Luis Molina-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Pasadena (Jan 2013)
· Commander James Pickens-Executive Officer frigate Gary (Feb 2013)
· Lieutenant Commander Mark Rice-U.S. Navy Commander Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
· Commander Michael Runkle-U.S. Navy Commander of Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 2 (May 2013)
· Commander Jason Stapleton-Executive Office Patrol Squadron 4 in Hawaii (Mar 2013)
· Commander Nathan Sukols-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
· Lieutenant Daniel Tyler-Executive Officer Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
· Commander Edward White-U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 106 (Aug 2013)
· Captain Jeffrey Winter-U.S. Navy Commander of Carrier Air Wing 17 (Sept 2013)
· Commander Thomas Winter-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Montpelier (Jan 2013)
· Commander Corey Wofford- U.S. Navy Commander frigate Kauffman (Feb 2013)
Since Barack Obama has been in the White House, high ranking military officers have been removed from their positions at a rate that is absolutely unprecedented. Things have gotten so bad that a number of retired generals are publicly speaking out about the 'purge' of the U.S. military that they believe is taking place. As you will see below, dozens of highly decorated military leaders have been dismissed from their positions over the past few years. So why is this happening? What is going on right now is absolutely crazy especially during a time of peace. Is there a deliberate attempt to reshape the military and remove those who don't adhere to the proper 'viewpoints' ? Does someone out there feel a need to get officers that won't cooperate out of the way?
Throughout world history, whatever comes next after a military purge is never good.
If this continues, what is the U.S. military going to look like in a few years?
Perhaps you are reading this and you think that 'purge' is too strong a word for what is taking place. Well, just consider the following quotes from some very highly decorated retired officers:
-Retired Army Major General Paul Vallely: The White House protects their own. That's why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He's intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.
-Retired Army Major General Patrick Brady: There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him.
-Retired Army Lt. General William G. Jerry Boykin: Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause.
-Retired Navy Captain Joseph John: I believe there are more than 137 officers who have been forced out or given bad evaluation reports so they will never make Flag (officer), because of their failure to comply to certain views.
A Pentagon official who asked to remain nameless because they were not authorized to speak on the matter said even young officers, down through the ranks have been told not to talk about Obama or the politics of the White House. They are purging everyone and if you want to keep your job just keep your mouth shut. Now this trend appears to be accelerating.
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military>
General Vallely's comment:
Absolutely every communist regime on the planet did this as soon as they got in power. I am surprised this communist traitor with his feet up on our furniture in the white house hasn't done this until now!
SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?
I am doing my part. How about forwarding this.
Paul
(General Paul Vallely)
The picture is of the five first line US nuclear carriers docked together in one place. Just like Battleship Row, Pearl Harbor , December 7, 1941.
This picture was taken the February 2014 in Norfolk , Virginia … Obama ordered 5 nuclear carriers into harbor for "routine" (?) inspections. Heads of the Navy were flabbergasted by the directive but had to comply as it was a direct order from their Commander-in-Chief.
The carriers were all pulled out from the MIDDLE EAST and the Afghanistan support role leaving our land forces naked and exposed!
NORFOLK, VA. (February 8, 2014). This is the first time since WWII that five nuclear powered aircraft carriers were docked together. USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69), USS George H.W. Bush (CVN 77), USS Enterprise (CVN 65), USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75), and USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) are all in port at Naval Station Norfolk , Va. , the world’s largest naval station.
Knowledgeable sources stated that this breached a long standing military protocol in the Navy meant to avoid a massive enemy strike on major US forces.
(U..S. Navy photo by Chief Mass Communication Specialist Ryan J. Courtade/Released).
Obama is ‘Commander in chief’.
This ordering of most of the Navy's capitol ships into one place is unprecedented since Pearl Harbor ! This could be the creation of a false flag atomic incident too stupid for any enemy to pass up.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, why did the following happen? Is this a routine changing of the guard? Or what? I'm afraid of the "what"
Major General Paul Vallely (Ret):
This long list of senior military officers and one sergeant major
comes at no great surprise to me because of the direction this
country is heading.
Here is the list of our military elite who have been purged or fired under Obama:
Commanding Generals fired:
· General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012)
· Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013)
· Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013)
· Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013)
· Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011)
· Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013)
· General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013)
· Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point , NY (2013)
· Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013)
· General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013)
· Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico 's Security Battalion (Oct 2013)
· General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010)
· General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009)
· General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012)
· Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013)
· Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013)
· Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013)
· Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013)
Commanding Admirals fired:
· Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)
· Vice Admiral Tim Giardina(3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2011)
· Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011)
· Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs , NY (Aug 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011)
· Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story , VA (Aug 2011)
· Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011)
· Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (Jun 2011)
· Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011)
· Commander Kevin Harms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln (Mar 2011)
· Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011)
· Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011)
· Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego
(Apr 2011)
· Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific
(Mar 2011)
· Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011)
· Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)
· Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011)
· Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota , U.S. Navy Commander Naval Activities Spain (Apr 2011)
· Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island , WA (Apr 2011)
· Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011)
· Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011)
· Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011)
· Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island , WA (Jul 2011)
· Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville , TN (Jul 2011)
· Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011)
· Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011)
· Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012):
· Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012)
· Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012)
· Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012)
· Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012)
· Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station's Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic (Sep 2012)
· Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Captain Daniel Dusek-U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme
· Commander David Faught-Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012)
· Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012)
· Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012)
· Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012)
· Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012)
· Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012)
· Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012)
· Commander Dennis Klein- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012)
· Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (Jun 2012)
· Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012)
· Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012)
· Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL (Nov 2012)
· Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012)
· Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxent River , MD (Jun 2012)
· Captain Jeffrey Riedel- Program manager, Littoral Combat Ship program (Jan 2012)
· Commander Sara Santoski- U.S. Navy Commander Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 15 (Sep 2012)
· Commander Kyle G. Strudthoff-Executive Officer Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25 (Sep 2012)
· Commander Sheryl Tannahill- U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Nashville , TN (Sep 2012)
· Commander Michael Ward- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Pittsburgh (Aug 2012)
· Captain Michael Wiegand- U.S. Navy Commander Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (Nov 2012)
· Captain Ted Williams- U.S. Navy Commander amphibious command ship Mount Whitney (Nov 2012)
· Commander Jeffrey Wissel- U.S. Navy Commander of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (Feb 2012)
Naval Officers fired: (All in 2013):
· Lieutenant Commander Lauren Allen-Executive Officer submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
· Reserve Captain Jay Bowman-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Fort Dix , NJ (Mar 2013)
· Captain William Cogar-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Mercy's medical treatment facility (Sept 2013)
· Commander Steve Fuller-Executive Officer frigate Kauffman (Mar 2013)
· Captain Shawn Hendricks-Program Manager for naval enterprise IT networks (June 2013)
· Captain David Hunter-U.S. Navy Commander of Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 12 & Coastal Riverine Group 2 (Feb 2013)
· Captain Eric Johnson-U.S. Navy Chief of Military Entrance Processing Command at Great Lakes Naval Training Center, IL (2013)
· Captain Devon Jones-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Air Facility El Centro , CA (July 2013)
· Captain Kevin Knoop-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Comfort's medical treatment facility (Aug 2013)
· Lieutenant Commander Jack O'Neill-U.S. Navy Commander Operational Support Center Rock Island , IL (Mar 2013)
· Commander Allen Maestas-Executive Officer Beachmaster Unit 1 (May 2013)
· Commander Luis Molina-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Pasadena (Jan 2013)
· Commander James Pickens-Executive Officer frigate Gary (Feb 2013)
· Lieutenant Commander Mark Rice-U.S. Navy Commander Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
· Commander Michael Runkle-U.S. Navy Commander of Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 2 (May 2013)
· Commander Jason Stapleton-Executive Office Patrol Squadron 4 in Hawaii (Mar 2013)
· Commander Nathan Sukols-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013)
· Lieutenant Daniel Tyler-Executive Officer Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013)
· Commander Edward White-U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 106 (Aug 2013)
· Captain Jeffrey Winter-U.S. Navy Commander of Carrier Air Wing 17 (Sept 2013)
· Commander Thomas Winter-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Montpelier (Jan 2013)
· Commander Corey Wofford- U.S. Navy Commander frigate Kauffman (Feb 2013)
Since Barack Obama has been in the White House, high ranking military officers have been removed from their positions at a rate that is absolutely unprecedented. Things have gotten so bad that a number of retired generals are publicly speaking out about the 'purge' of the U.S. military that they believe is taking place. As you will see below, dozens of highly decorated military leaders have been dismissed from their positions over the past few years. So why is this happening? What is going on right now is absolutely crazy especially during a time of peace. Is there a deliberate attempt to reshape the military and remove those who don't adhere to the proper 'viewpoints' ? Does someone out there feel a need to get officers that won't cooperate out of the way?
Throughout world history, whatever comes next after a military purge is never good.
If this continues, what is the U.S. military going to look like in a few years?
Perhaps you are reading this and you think that 'purge' is too strong a word for what is taking place. Well, just consider the following quotes from some very highly decorated retired officers:
-Retired Army Major General Paul Vallely: The White House protects their own. That's why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He's intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.
-Retired Army Major General Patrick Brady: There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him.
-Retired Army Lt. General William G. Jerry Boykin: Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause.
-Retired Navy Captain Joseph John: I believe there are more than 137 officers who have been forced out or given bad evaluation reports so they will never make Flag (officer), because of their failure to comply to certain views.
A Pentagon official who asked to remain nameless because they were not authorized to speak on the matter said even young officers, down through the ranks have been told not to talk about Obama or the politics of the White House. They are purging everyone and if you want to keep your job just keep your mouth shut. Now this trend appears to be accelerating.
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military <http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military>
General Vallely's comment:
Absolutely every communist regime on the planet did this as soon as they got in power. I am surprised this communist traitor with his feet up on our furniture in the white house hasn't done this until now!
SO WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT?
I am doing my part. How about forwarding this.
Paul
(General Paul Vallely)
La Prensa No Se Ha
Atrevido A Publicar La Foto…
De Los Futuros Oficiales Del Ejercito
Que Se QUEDARON SENTADOS En
Señal De Rechazo A Obama…
Miren esto y piensen lo que está pasando en Estados Unidos… cuando los futuros
oficiales, todos
ellos nombrados a
West Point por sus Congresistas y Senadores,
Solo El 25% Reciben Al Presidente Parados.
Tenemos un Gobierno que No Tiene El
Respaldo De Sus
Fuerzas Militares, pero La Prensa lo tapa todo
y el traidor
Republicano John Boehner es cómplice que también lo
mantiene callado:
Aquí tienen la NOTICIA sin
foto… Obama receives standing ovation from Less Than 25% Of West Point Cadets
President
Obama was welcomed by the Black Knight of the Hudson for his speech at West
Point on Wednesday,
but
less than 25 percent of the cadets gave him a standing ovation upon his
introduction, the Daily Mail reported.
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/obama-receives-standing-ovation-introduction-less-/#.U4ZRiJ_qf4E.twitter#ixzz3CiLt3NHW
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/obama-receives-standing-ovation-introduction-less-/#.U4ZRiJ_qf4E.twitter#ixzz3CiLt3NHW
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
Fijanse que Obama no confia ni en su propia guardia de honor y los
envia a desfilar con rifles sin cerrojo
aunque Obama esté detrás de una pantalla anti-balas:
Los rifles de la guardia de honor de Obama, no funcionan! Han sido inhabilitados!!
The
email linked to a YouTube video of the 57th Presidential Inaugural Parade,
embedded in this column, featuring Bravo Company Marines from the Marine
Barracks Washington. Sure enough, the observation in the email is confirmed by
watching the video, with screen shots provided in the photo and slide show
accompanying this article.
This prompted an internet search to see if others had also noticed, and the Blur-Brain blog had.
“The bolts have been removed from the rifles rendering them unable to fire a round,” the post stated. “Apparently Obama’s Secret Service doesn’t trust the USMC. Simply searching each guy to make sure he didn’t have a live round hidden on him wasn’t enough, they had to make sure the guns were inoperable.
Wondering if this may be an inauguration policy of long standing that transcends administrations, Gun Rights Examiner made a cursory search and found something even more curious. In the 2009 Inaugural Parade, the United States Navy marched with rifles that had not been so disabled (see 1:24 into that video plus the final slide).
This prompted an internet search to see if others had also noticed, and the Blur-Brain blog had.
“The bolts have been removed from the rifles rendering them unable to fire a round,” the post stated. “Apparently Obama’s Secret Service doesn’t trust the USMC. Simply searching each guy to make sure he didn’t have a live round hidden on him wasn’t enough, they had to make sure the guns were inoperable.
Wondering if this may be an inauguration policy of long standing that transcends administrations, Gun Rights Examiner made a cursory search and found something even more curious. In the 2009 Inaugural Parade, the United States Navy marched with rifles that had not been so disabled (see 1:24 into that video plus the final slide).
No fue la primera vez:
Obama Administration Tells Marines to Leave
Weapons
Outside Tent For Panetta’s Speech
Este Gobierno, es un verguenza pero la jefatura Republicana,
a sido comprada o son cobardes.
Comenzó La Prensa
SOCIALISTAS y Pro Homosexual
LA PUBLICIDAD PARA EXONERAR A
OBAMA Y La Clinton
Por El Abandono Y Las
Muertes Del Embajador y 3 Mas
En La Residencia De
Estados Unidos En Benghazi, Libia…
En las próximas semanas se
dará a la publicidad un LIBRO donde le echan
La culpa al JEFE DE LA OFICINA
de la CIA en Benghazi…
Desde La Época De Rey De
Persia Darío… Los Jefes siempre han
sido los
RESPONSABLES de los DESASTRES…
NO LOS SUBALTERNOS… pues
Darío
Consideró que si los JEFES
RECLAMAN LOS TRIUNFOS… en la misma
Forma son responsables de
las DERROTAS…
Ahora en los Estados Unidos
de Obama y los Clinton… los triunfos son de
Los JEFES… y las DERROTAS…
de los subalternos…
Para leer la noticia del
nuevo libro…
La Ultima Victoria De La “Política Internacional De Obama”Obama Ayer En Wales… Reclamó Una Victoria diciendo:
“Gracias A Las Sanciones Que Le Hemos Hecho
A Rusia… Tuvieron Que Firmar La Tregua”
La Prensa Socialista, Pro Homosexual y Mariguanera… No Le Ha
DESMENTIDO…
Nunca Señala Que Obama Es RESPONSABLE DEL TOTAL DESCALABRO Que Esta Viviendo USA y Todos Los Países…
La Verdad Es que el Presidente de Ucrania en la Cara de Obama…
Firmó Con Putin…Pues No Cree En USA… Que Esta Gobernada Por MUNDIALISTAS Que
Desean Un “Nuevo Orden Mundial” copia del Sistema Feudal… anterior a la
Revolución Francesa…
Aquí tienen la noticia…
Wales on Friday,
Mr. Obama claimed that Western sanctions had made the cease-fire possible. That’s
one way of looking at it.
Another is that the
weak U.S. and European response to Russia’s aggression has placed Mr. Putin in
a position to carve another
piece from Ukraine.
Para leer todo el artículo:
La Teoría Militar Desde La
Guerra Ruso-Japonés De 1905
A Sido, No
En Matar Al Soldado Enemigo, Sino,
Que Era
Mucho Mejor Herir Un
Soldado Enemigo…
El daño moral a los
ejércitos enemigos, es mucho mayor si REGRESAN soldados heridos que muertos
También el costo del
herido es mucho más alto…
Para lograr eso, los
japoneses redujeron el tamaño de sus balas a 6,5mm. Comparado con el calibre
ruso 7.62mm
Después de la Segunda
Guerra Mundial, los EEUU también se unió a esa FILOSOFÍA GUERRERA y cambiaron
los rifles al calibre .223
o 5,56mm reduciendo sus balas del estándar americano de .308 o
7.62mm.
Entonces, es claro que las
ejecuciones de ISIS no es una estrategia militar.
Llevamos más de 100 años hiriendo
a los enemigos. Es
simplemente una estrategia política, ¿PERO DE QUIEN?
Quien dio esa orden y por
que?
¿Quién se beneficia de una guerra a muerte??
Ahora Que Los MUSULMANES Han
Asesinados Indefensos Ciudadanos AMERICANOS…
La PROTESTA ES MUNDIAL… Pero Lo Están Haciendo Desde Hace Tiempo…
En el Mes De Mayo Salió
Publicado nada menos que en la Agencia FINANCIADA
Por los Estados Unidos “Public
Broacasting Company” una
entrevista con un
Terrorista Sirio… (los
que el Senador Republicano McCain decía que eran buenos)
En que confesó que fue
entrenado por los ESTADOS UNIDOS… PARA ASESINAR
A los prisioneros que
quedaran vivos…
Aquí tienen la noticia:
Syrian Rebels Describe U.S.-Backed Training in Qatar
Then in May of 2014 PBS ran a report in
which they interviewed rebels who were trained by the U.S. in Qatar. According
to those rebels they were being trained to finish off soldiers who survived
attacks. "They trained us to ambush regime or enemy vehicles and cut
off the road,” said the fighter, who is identified only as "Hussein."
"They also trained us on how to attack a vehicle, raid it, retrieve
information or weapons and munitions, and how to finish off soldiers still
alive after an ambush." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syria-arming-the-rebels/syrian-rebels-describe-u-s-backed-training-in-qatar/
Qatar es un aliado Americano.
This is the US military base in Qatar. Why is the US training the Syrian rebels to kill captured enemy combatants?
This is the US military base in Qatar. Why is the US training the Syrian rebels to kill captured enemy combatants?
Who needs the shock value of such brutality?
La Noticia Fue Dada En
Mayo… Ahora Explotó el ESCANDALO…
Es Hora De Que Los Ciudadanos
De USA DECIDAN…
Estados Unidos Demoró 34
AÑOS en decir la verdad Sobre Su Intervención Secreta En
Afganistán...
Han Pasado Desde 1957…57 Años Y Todavía No Han RECONOCIDO Que Fidel Castro Fue Apoyado
Primero Y En 1961 Los Norte Americanos Planearon La
TRAICIÓN De Bahía
De Cochinos Para CONSOLIDARLO
EN EL PODER… Y Usarlo Para COMUNIZAR Toda Latino América…
Aquí tienen la noticia de
que el “PACIFISTA” de Carter Fue el que comenzó la guerra En Afganistán… dicha
nada menos que por los miembros de su GABINETE…
Robert Gates finally
reveals and Brzezinski confirms that the US lured the Soviets into invading
Afghanistan!
We have been told,
that the US policy was due to the Soviet Invasion,
but now we know that
it was the USA that armed the Taliban in order to destabilize Afghanistan.
Question:
The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From
the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this
period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You
therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?
Brzezinski:
Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen
began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan,
24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely
otherwise Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first
directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul.
And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him
that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.
Una Pandilla De Negros
Atacaron
A Una Pareja De Blancos
Que Se
Encontraban Juntos…
¿Cuál Fue El Motivo Del
Ataque?
Odio Racial…
Si No fuera Por La
INTERNET Nadie se enteraría…
Donde Esta La Prensa
Socialista y Pro Homosexual…
Que defiende a todos los
“DISCRIMINADOS”
Obama Seguro que No Va A
Decir Que Desea
Tener Un Hijo Como ellos…
Donde Esta La Policía , la
Justicia y el MULATICO DE Eric Holder????
Todos
Los Blancos Somos Los Responsables De Que Los Negros Se Subleven Y Queden Sin
Castigo…
¿Hasta Cuándo Vamos A Permitir Que Los Negros Aterroricen? Ayer un grupo de negros, atacaron a tres blancos, y
los patearon en el suelo…
Sin Duda Un
Hecho De Odio Racial… Pero Nadie Fue Detenido….Los
Politiqueros callados… La Prensa
también. ¿Qué vamos hacer? ¿Que vas hacer tu? http://bearingarms.com/got-white-dude-shannon-watts-need-guns-go-grocery-shopping/?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
Todo
Lo Que Leemos En La Prensa De Occidente
Son Excusas A Los Fracasos Continuos De Obama
A
Mi Entender; Llevamos 6
Años De Continuos Fracasos…Todos
Tapados
Por la Prensa controlada por Socialistas y Pro Homosexuales…
Pero
Los Fracasos Mas Grande Los Ha Cometido Con Putin… 1. Fue Cuando Quiso
Bombardear Siria… Por haber “Cruzado La Línea” Se tuvo que echar para
atrás…
2. Obama y la Clinton por
años planificaron que Ucrania se aliara a La OTAN… y gastaron millones en
ayudas… lo
cual consiguieron… pero
3. Putin en 5 meses…
logró quedarse con la CRIMEA y las ciudades Importantes y definitivamente
Ucrania No Se unirá a la OTAN…
Además de todos esos CONTINUOS FRACASOS
INTERNACIONALES… USA Continua en Crisis y HOY se reportó que los hogares de USA
tienen $5,500.00
Menos que cuando Obama tomo el poder… a pesar de que ha continuado IMPRIMIENDO DÓLARES… Que
van a CAUSAR UNA INFLACIÓN que arruinara Totalmente el país…
¿Por Qué No Hay “NEGROS” Acusados De Odio Racial?
Los Fiscales y Los Politiqueros Los Protegen…
Hay Que Comenzar A DECIR Y
EXIGIR Que la
ley Se Aplique Pareja…
Ayer… Otro
Negro Ataca Por
SORPRESA A
Un Blanco...
Pero, Todavía Nadie Se Atreve A Decir, Que Son
Ataques Raciales!!!
Hasta Los Negros Honestos, Saben Que Estos Ataques Son Racistas…
Esta vez, fue detenido,.. Porque fue
reconocido como UN FUTBOLISTA UNIVERSITARIO… ES decir un BECADO … Posiblemente un PANDILLERO DE BARRIO… que no tiene ningún
interés en estudiar y superarse…
¿Por qué Esta Becado En La
Universidad?
El DECANO DE LA UNIVERSIDAD… desea
tener un equipo de FUTBOL Aunque tenga que traer al recinto PANDILLEROS…
y vendedores
De DROGA…
Para eso le suben la cuota a los
estudiantes… que con sacrificio estudian… ACCIÓN QUE PERVIERTE LA MORAL SOCIAL…
Aquí tiene el video…
Solo Los Militares Retirados
Se Atreven... A Decir La Verdad…
Pero Lo Hacen COBARDEMENTE…
Como Un Honesto Error
Después Que El Daño Fue Hecho…
Ayer en Fox News El General en el video Declaro: Que Fueron
Obama y la Clinton los que Crearon y armaron a ISIS.
Pero porque este General lo hace parecer, COMO UNA
EQUIVOCACIÓN.
Cuando la realidad, más que probada, es que fue la política de
Obama y Hillary
Los que PRODUJERON LA LLAMADA POR LA PRENSA SOCIALISTA Y Pro
Homosexual
“La Primavera Árabe”
La Prensa continua
defendiendo a OBAMA… Lo Cual,
ya todo el mundo lo sabe!
Los Periodistas Que Critican A
Obama Lo Hacen Cobardemente…
El Pueblo En la calle NO…
Aquí
tienen la noticia… desde luego MEDIATIZADA
BOMBSHELL: General Reveals to Fox News
How Obama ARMED the “Islamic State”
“We
backed I believe in some cases, some of the wrong people and not in the right
part of the Free Syrian Army and that’s a little confusing to people, so I’ve
always maintained … that we were backing the wrong types. Some of those weapons
from Benghazi ended up in the hands of ISIS – so we helped build ISIS.”
In fact, Obama himself is responsible
for the rise of the Islamic State,
and for the fearsome and technologically advanced weaponry they wield.
To fully understand how Obama
armed the Islamic State, we must
go back to Libya in 2012, before the Benghazi attack.
According to WND, a new military intelligence report released by the
West Point counterterrorism center details how the Islamic State got their
hands on such advanced weapons as “recoiless rifles, shoulder fired anti-tank
weapons, anti-tank missiles,” and even anti-aircraft missiles, not to mention
thousands of rifles and rounds of ammunition.
It all goes back to Libya, when Obama unilaterally waged an unauthorized
war against Qaddafi. Obama
gave arms to the Libyan rebels,
who were linked to Al-Qaeda, and then supported them with airstrikes on
Qaddafi’s regime. Ultimately, thanks to the weapons and supporting
airstrikes, the Libyan militants were able to assassinate Qaddafi and overthrow
his regime. Libya has yet to recover, and is now a lawless terrorist
state.
¿Cómo Es Posible? La
Policía Escolar Se Arma
Con Equipos Militares Y Hasta
Con Carros Brindados…
Aquí
tienen la noticia
Military rifles,
armor sent to Texas school police
In
all, the departments received 64 M16 rifles, 18 M14 rifles, 25 automatic
pistols, and magazines capable of holding 4,500 rounds of ammunition as well
armored plating, tactical vests, and 15 surplus military vehicles.
Continuamente Nos Enteramos De
Viajes De Nuestros Politiqueros…
¿A Que Viajan?
Sus Viajes Son Para “CONSEGUIR APOYOS” Mejor DEBEMOS DECIR:
“Para Conseguir DINERO”
Para “Vender Sus Votos…
Te puedes imaginar lo que haría la Prensa si un político americano
fuese a una reunión en Rusia?
Pues todos nuestros políticos van a Israel para ser educados… en la
GLOBALIZACIÓN…
Pero Asombrence…
Ahora, que MÉJICO TIENE EL SEGUNDO
HOMBRE MAS RICO DEL
MUNDO… QUIEN SALVO
AL NEW YORK TIME… Han comenzado
a ir
a Méjico a buscar EL APOYO DE
LOS GLOBALISTAS!
El Gobierno Mundial, No Tiene Fronteras.
Las fronteras son solo para las ovejas que pagan los impuestos:
Miren Este TITULAR Que Nos
INFORMA Que La ASPIRANTE A
PRESIDENTE En 2016…SE FUE A MÉJICO A Un Agasajo A Slim
También fue el Gobernador Ex
Gordo de New Jersey…
Hillary Clinton Follows Christie to Mexico for
Carlos Slim Event
Más Cosas Que La Prensa Nos Oculta...
Antes de la revolución de Maidán, Ucrania Era Un Problema Para Rusia.
Pero Rusia
tenía que mantenerla… NO LE
COBRABA… Ni el GAS ni el PETRÓLEO… pues por su territorio pasaban los
oleoductos que se usaban Para enviar el gas y el petróleo a la COMUNIDAD
EUROPEA…
Eso Lo Hacia Rusia Por Razones Estratégicas Y COMERCIALES.
ENTONCES… Los
GLOBALISTAS usando a Obama y la Hillary Clinton Comenzaron la campaña de que
Ucrania se uniera a la Comunidad Europea… y a la OTAN Y SEGÚN SE DICE
invirtieron $1,000 millones… Para cercar a Rusia…
Ante esa situación… Rusia… SE
APODERÓ de La
CRIMEA…territorio que le era IMPORTANTE PUES ERA SU ÚNICA SALIDAD AL
MAR NEGRO… y ahora de la “Segunda Ciudad de Ucrania… Y LE DEJO A la Unión
Europea…La Ucrania que NO PRODUCE…
Ahora Gracias a Obama y La Señora Clinton…Ucrania
DEJO de ser un PROBLEMA PARA RUSIA… y Es Un Problema Más Para
Europa.
La Noticia Que No NOS DICEN… Es
Que Todos Los Bienes De Ucrania Van A Ser VENDIDOS… A PRECIOS REGALADOS A Los Globalistas…
(uno de los beneficiarios es el hijo del vicepresidente de USA Biden… ahora es
Vicepresidente de la compañía que controla los Oleoductos de Ucrania… Y
Todas Las Deudas, Van A Ser Pagadas Por El Pueblo Ucranio.
Lo mismo, va suceder cuando América entre en quiebra!:
Aquí tienen la NOTICIA “El Fondo Monetario Internacional”
(es decir los pobres de los
países occidentales) Le Acaban De
Prestaron $1.3 BILLONES A
UCRANIA… Aquí tienen la NOTICIA… Ukraine Gets $1.3 Bln in Third IMF
Bailout Installment
To receive the IMF
funds in full,
Ukraine agreed to a severe austerity program that includes shedding 24,000
government jobs, raising taxes, selling off state assets and
withdrawing subsidies on natural gas.
Ukraine’s economy is
suffering as a result of the crisis in the country, with government forces
fighting against independence supporters in the southeastern regions.
Kiev also has a
significant gas debt which it owes to Russian gas giant Gazprom and which is
estimated to stand at over $5.3 billion.
Hasta aquí la columna de Ricardo Samitier…
The Virtue of
Subtlety: A U.S. Strategy against the Islamic State
U.S. President Barack
Obama said recently that he had no strategy as yet toward the Islamic State but
that he would present a plan on Wednesday. It is important for a president to
know when he has no strategy. It is not necessarily wise to announce it, as
friends will be frightened and enemies delighted. A president must know what it
is he does not know, and he should remain calm in pursuit of it, but there is
no obligation to be honest about it.
This is particularly
true because, in a certain sense, Obama has a strategy, though it is not
necessarily one he likes. Strategy is something that emerges from reality,
while tactics might be chosen. Given the situation, the United States has an
unavoidable strategy. There are options and uncertainties for employing it. Let
us consider some of the things that Obama does know.
The Formation of National Strategy
There are serious
crises on the northern and southern edges of the Black Sea Basin. There is no
crisis in the Black Sea itself, but it is surrounded by crises. The United States
has been concerned about the status of Russia ever since U.S. President
Theodore Roosevelt negotiated the end of the Russo-Japanese war in 1905. The
United States has been concerned about the Middle East since U.S. President
Dwight D. Eisenhower forced the British to retreat from Suez in 1956. As a
result, the United States inherited -- or seized -- the British position.
A national strategy
emerges over the decades and centuries. It becomes a set of national interests
into which a great deal has been invested, upon which a great deal depends and
upon which many are counting. Presidents inherit national strategies, and they
can modify them to some extent. But the idea that a president has the power
to craft a new national strategy both overstates his power and understates the
power of realities crafted by all those who came before him. We are all trapped
in circumstances into which we were born and choices that were made for us. The
United States has an inherent interest in Ukraine
and in Syria-Iraq. Whether we
should have that interest is an interesting philosophical question for a
late-night discussion, followed by a sunrise when we return to reality. These
places reflexively matter to the United States.
The American strategy
is fixed: Allow powers in the region to compete and balance against each other. When that fails, intervene with as little
force and risk as possible. For example, the conflict between Iran and Iraq
canceled out two rising powers until the war ended. Then Iraq invaded Kuwait
and threatened to overturn the balance of power in the region. The result was
Desert Storm.
This strategy
provides a model. In the Syria-Iraq region, the initial strategy is to allow
the regional powers to balance each other, while providing as little support as
possible to maintain the balance of power. It is crucial to understand the
balance of power in detail, and to understand what might undermine it, so that
any force can be applied effectively. This is the tactical part, and it is the
tactical part that can go wrong. The strategy has a logic of its own.
Understanding what that strategy demands is the hard part. Some nations have
lost their sovereignty by not understanding what strategy demands. France in
1940 comes to mind. For the United States, there is no threat to sovereignty,
but that makes the process harder: Great powers can tend to be casual because
the situation is not existential. This increases the cost of doing what is
necessary.
The ground where we
are talking about applying this model is Syria and Iraq. Both of
these central governments have lost control of the country as a whole, but each
remains a force. Both countries are divided by religion, and the religions are
divided internally as well. In a sense, the nations have ceased to exist, and
the fragments they consisted of are now smaller but more complex entities.
The issue is whether
the United States can live with this situation or whether it must reshape it.
The immediate question is whether the United States has the power to reshape it
and to what extent. The American interest turns on its ability to balance local
forces. If that exists, the question is whether there is any other shape that
can be achieved through American power that would be superior. From my point of
view, there are many different shapes that can be imagined, but few that can be
achieved. The American experience in Iraq highlighted the problems with
counterinsurgency or being caught in a local civil war. The idea of major
intervention assumes that this time it will be different. This fits one famous
definition of insanity.
The Islamic State's Role
There is then the
special case of the Islamic State. It is special because its emergence
triggered the current crisis. It is special because the brutal murder of two
prisoners on video showed a particular cruelty. And it is different because its
ideology is similar to that of al Qaeda, which attacked the United States. It
has excited particular American passions.
To counter this, I
would argue that the uprising by Iraq's Sunni community was inevitable, with
its marginalization by Nouri al-Maliki's Shiite regime in Baghdad. That it took
this particularly virulent form is because the more conservative elements of
the Sunni community were unable or unwilling to challenge al-Maliki. But the
fragmentation of Iraq into Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish regions was well underway
before the Islamic State, and jihadism was deeply embedded in the Sunni
community a long time ago.
Moreover, although
the Islamic State is brutal, its cruelty is not unique in the region. Syrian
President Bashar al Assad and others may not have killed Americans or uploaded
killings to YouTube, but their history of ghastly acts is comparable. Finally,
the Islamic State -- engaged in war with everyone around it -- is much less
dangerous to the United States than a small group with time on its hands,
planning an attack. In any event, if the Islamic State did not exist, the
threat to the United States from jihadist groups in Yemen or Libya or somewhere
inside the United States would remain.
Because the Islamic
State operates to some extent as a conventional military force, it is
vulnerable to U.S. air power. The use of air power against conventional forces
that lack anti-aircraft missiles is a useful gambit. It shows that the United
States is doing something, while taking little risk, assuming that the Islamic
State really does not have anti-aircraft missiles. But it accomplishes little.
The Islamic State will disperse its forces, denying conventional aircraft a
target. Attempting to defeat the Islamic State by distinguishing its supporters
from other Sunni groups and killing them will founder at the first step. The
problem of counterinsurgency is identifying the insurgent.
There is no reason
not to bomb the Islamic State's forces and leaders. They certainly deserve it.
But there should be no illusion that bombing them will force them to capitulate
or mend their ways. They are now part of the fabric of the Sunni community, and
only the Sunni community can root them out. Identifying Sunnis who are
anti-Islamic State and supplying them with weapons is a much better idea. It is
the balance-of-power strategy that the United States follows, but this approach
doesn't have the dramatic satisfaction of blowing up the enemy. That
satisfaction is not trivial, and the United States can certainly blow something
up and call it the enemy, but it does not address the strategic problem.
In the first place,
is it really a problem for the United States? The American interest is not
stability but the existence of a dynamic balance of power in which all players
are effectively paralyzed so that no one who would threaten the United States
emerges. The Islamic State had real successes at first, but the balance of
power with the Kurds and Shia has limited its expansion, and tensions within
the Sunni community diverted its attention. Certainly there is the danger of
intercontinental terrorism, and U.S. intelligence should be active in
identifying and destroying these threats. But the re-occupation of Iraq, or
Iraq plus Syria, makes no sense. The United States does not have the force
needed to occupy Iraq and Syria at the same time. The demographic imbalance
between available forces and the local population makes that impossible.
The danger is that
other Islamic State franchises might emerge in other countries. But the United
States would not be able to block these threats as well as the other countries
in the region. Saudi Arabia must cope with any internal threat it faces not
because the United States is indifferent, but because the Saudis are much better
at dealing with such threats. In the end, the same can be said for the
Iranians.
Most important, it
can also be said for the Turks. The Turks are emerging as a regional power.
Their economy has grown dramatically in the past decade, their military is the
largest in the region, and they are part of the Islamic world. Their government
is Islamist but in no way similar to the Islamic State, which concerns Ankara.
This is partly because of Ankara's fear that the jihadist group might spread to
Turkey, but more so because its impact on Iraqi Kurdistan could affect Turkey's
long-term energy plans.
Forming a New Balance in the Region
The United States
cannot win the game of small mosaic tiles that is emerging in Syria and Iraq.
An American intervention at this microscopic level can only fail. But the
principle of balance of power does not mean that balance must be maintained
directly. Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia have far more at stake in this than the
United States. So long as they believe that the United States will attempt to
control the situation, it is perfectly rational for them to back off and watch,
or act in the margins, or even hinder the Americans.
The United States
must turn this from a balance of power between Syria and Iraq to a balance of
power among this trio of regional powers. They have far more at stake and,
absent the United States, they have no choice but to involve themselves. They
cannot stand by and watch a chaos that could spread to them.
It is impossible to
forecast how the game is played out. What is important is that the game begins.
The Turks do not trust the Iranians, and neither is comfortable with the
Saudis. They will cooperate, compete, manipulate and betray, just as the United
States or any country might do in such a circumstance. The point is that there
is a tactic that will fail: American re-involvement. There is a tactic that
will succeed: the United States making it clear that while it might aid the
pacification in some way, the responsibility is on regional powers. The inevitable
outcome will be a regional competition that the United States can manage far
better than the current chaos.
Obama has sought
volunteers from NATO for a coalition to
fight the Islamic State. It is not
clear why he thinks those NATO countries -- with the exception of Turkey --
will spend their national treasures and lives to contain the Islamic State, or
why the Islamic State alone is the issue. The coalition that must form is not a
coalition of the symbolic, but a coalition of the urgently involved. That
coalition does not have to be recruited. In a real coalition, its members have
no choice but to join. And whether they act together or in competition, they
will have to act. And not acting will simply increase the risk to them.
U.S. strategy is
sound. It is to allow the balance of power to play out, to come in only when it
absolutely must -- with overwhelming force, as in Kuwait -- and to avoid
intervention where it cannot succeed. The tactical application of strategy is
the problem. In this case the tactic is not direct intervention by the United
States, save as a satisfying gesture to avenge murdered Americans. But the
solution rests in doing as little as possible and forcing regional powers into
the fray, then in maintaining the balance of power in this coalition.
Such an American
strategy is not an avoidance of responsibility. It is the use of U.S. power to
force a regional solution. Sometimes the best use of American power is to go to
war. Far more often, the best use of U.S. power is to withhold it. The United
States cannot evade responsibility in the region. But it is enormously
unimaginative to assume that carrying out that responsibility is best achieved
by direct intervention. Indirect intervention is frequently more efficient and
more effective.
Jorge Alberto Villalón Y.
Jorge
A Villalon: Is
not Europe, its Miami, Florida, USA. They are here already:
Have
you seen this in any TV station or newspaper? This is important for us to
know, this is our own city of Miami
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxQpzA8EqSo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BxQpzA8EqSo
Edward de Miranda: HOORAY a 53-46 vote.
The U.N. Resolution
2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most
interest is point number 11. It:"CALLS
FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all
UN countries".
By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution.
HOORAY.
This is that
brief, glorious moment in history when everyone stands around...reloading.
Now, Which 46
Senators Voted to Destroy Us? Well, let their names become known ! See below ..
If you vote in one of the states listed with these
46 "legislators"vote against them.
In a 53-46 vote,
the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from
entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose
from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent
the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade
Treaty." The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the
Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import
and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun
owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international
gun registry, now get this, on all private
guns and ammo.
Astonishingly, 46
out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our
Constitutional rights to a foreign power.
Here are the 46
senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.
Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin
(D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
What? No
Republicans????
Folks: This needs
to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to
lose their next election. We have been betrayed.
46 Senators Voted
to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.
|
|
|
Los hijos del odio.
Muchos de los que conducen
los destinos del gobierno se han criado bajo la cultura del rencor y el
resentimiento. Se cansaron de escuchar desde niños que el progreso ajeno no
es producto del mérito propio, sino de la suerte, la herencia, los negociados
o la picardía. Unas pocas veces ese contaminante relato se ajusta a los
hechos. En la mayoría de los casos tiene que ver con merecimientos genuinos que
deberían ser reconocidos sin atenuantes.
|
|
ALADINO 2014...
Una mujer se encuentra una Lámpara de Aladino.
Una mujer se encuentra una Lámpara de Aladino.
Inmediatamente la frota
y, como es lo usual, sale un Genio.
La mujer mira al Genio y le pide un deseo:
La mujer mira al Genio y le pide un deseo:
.- Quiero que mi marido me mire solo a mí,
.- Que Yo sea la única,
- Que desayune, coma y duerma siempre a mi lado,
.- Que cuando se levante sea lo primero que agarre ,
.- Que no me deje ni para ir al baño ,
.- Que viaje siempre conmigo,
.- Que me cuide, me contemple,
.- Que si me pierdo un segundo, se desespere, y me diga la falta que le hago,
.- Que nunca me deje sola y me lleve a todas partes con él.... Y zasssss.... !!!La convirtió en un Celular!!!!
.- Que Yo sea la única,
- Que desayune, coma y duerma siempre a mi lado,
.- Que cuando se levante sea lo primero que agarre ,
.- Que no me deje ni para ir al baño ,
.- Que viaje siempre conmigo,
.- Que me cuide, me contemple,
.- Que si me pierdo un segundo, se desespere, y me diga la falta que le hago,
.- Que nunca me deje sola y me lleve a todas partes con él.... Y zasssss.... !!!La convirtió en un Celular!!!!
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
Lázaro R. González Miño
“En mi opinión”
No comments:
Post a Comment