“IN GOD WE
TRUST” Lázaro R González Miño Editor.
La Traición y los cómplices…
A nadie aquí le ha llamado la atención de que miles de niños
han entrado de pronto por la frontera de Mejico con USA. Caballeros déjense de
comer enjundia de gallina. Esto es una invasión, si una invasión de niños para
hacerle las cosas más difíciles a los agentes guarda frontera que realmente no
se ocupan demasiado de guardar las fronteras y que además “En m opinión” no
reciben las ordenes enérgicas que debían recibir de su presidente. Esto no es
más que un capítulo más de esta opereta en la que casi todo el mundo es
espectador. Es como si a nadie le importara. Y así perderemos el mejor país del
mundo por los enemigos que entran por la frontera pero principalmente por los
ENEMIGOS INTERNOS que hasta sentados en el congreso y la silla presidencial y
los americanos están chupándose el dedo gordo y no hacen absolutamente nada por
parar este relajo y falta de respeto. Así vamos a celebrar el 4 de Julio. Los
que Firmaron ese documento el cuatro de julio se deben estar estremeciendo en
sus tumbas por ver la traición de los mismos americanos. ¿También eres tú un cómplice, que no vas a
hacer nada? Lázaro R González Miño
Remember How Seal Team 6 Was Shot Down? Now We Could
Finally Know Why Obama Is Covering It Up
In this video, we reveal this and much more...
On August 6,
2011, in Wardak Province, Afghanistan, jihadists perched on top of a building
shot down a decrepit CH-47 helicopter, Extortion 17, packed with 30 Special Ops
forces–most of them part of the elite SEAL Team 6. Almost immediately, facts
about the attack were hushed up that included skirting away the black box.
Furthermore, within hours, everyone on board was cremated, supposedly because
they were burned beyond recognition. Family members of the victims have learned
that virtually everything the Obama administration has revealed about the attack
is a lie.
The likely reason
for the coverup? The high-tech weapon used to shoot down Extortion 17, a
heat-seeking missile, more than likely was supplied by none other than Barack
Hussein Obama.
In this video, we
reveal this and much more…
The
views expressed in this opinion article are solely those of their author and
are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by WesternJournalism.com.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-seal-team-6-murder-weapon-supplied-obama/#IhtAqQPfZUiDBJC8.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/revealed-seal-team-6-murder-weapon-supplied-obama/#IhtAqQPfZUiDBJC8.99
Amenper: Memo to Anti-Coal Warriors
|
|
Usually, I don't speak much about nuclear
power.
Because of the fact that I have a son in the nuclear
industry, some may consider my opinion to be influenced
by personal interests.
But let me pass you this article of William
Tucker about Nuclear energy in today’s Journal.
Now that the liberal press is up in arms
against coal, they should remember that because of Jimmy Carter law against
nuclear plants, coal still exists as an important energy source. Otherwise it would be almost extinct.
We have the energy resources we need and
enough to export.
We have oil, but we don't drill, we have gas
but regulations make it difficult to use it, we have the best nuclear
technology in the world, but we had to give it to other countries, because our
president imposed a ban in nuclear plants for 35 years.
Jimmy Carter is in a close race with Obama for
the dubious honor of being the worst president in the history of the United
States.
Sometimes I ask myself, is this ignorance?, or
is it an intelligent plan designed to destroy the country?
Memo to Anti-Coal
Warriors: Make Nuclear Peace
It's not too late to fix
Jimmy Carter's energy blunder of the 1970s.
WILLIAM
TUCKER
The Environmental Protection Agency has issued a
645-page ruling whose basic aim is to cut coal plants out of the mix in
producing the nation's electricity. States will supposedly be given a choice,
but the only real way to meet the agency's demands for carbon-dioxide
reductions will be to cut back on coal. All this will be a devastating blow to
the Midwestern economy, driving up energy prices for everyone, while having
only the slightest impact on global warming.
There is a great irony to this. In the early 1970s,
coal was being phased out as the nation's principal source of electricity. The
initial concerns about air pollution had focused on coal, and environmental
groups such as the Sierra Club were campaigning to lift the 20-year-old ban on
imported oil so we could replace coal with low-sulfur oil from Libya and
Indonesia.
All this came to a halt with the Arab oil embargo of
1973-74. It became clear that burning oil for electricity in the U.S. was a luxury
we could no longer afford. But there was a salvation on the horizon. The nation
was just embarking on a monumental effort to implement nuclear power, with
almost 200 reactors on the drawing boards or in the pipeline. This would
supplant both coal and oil and solve the problem of air pollution once and for
all. (Concerns about carbon emissions had not yet arisen.)
Work on more than 50 reactors had already begun when
the effort hit a snag. With the new administration of President Jimmy
Carter, environmentalists gained
a foothold in the government for the first time. They were opposed to air
pollution but they were more opposed to nuclear power. At the same time, Mr.
Carter was under tremendous pressure to find a replacement for foreign oil, so
environmentalists came up with a solution. Theorists such as soft-energy guru
Amory Lovins argued that coal could be cleaned up through new technologies—the
fluidized bed, for instance, which pulverizes coal for nearly complete
combustion. This would allow coal to serve as a bridge to the coming legions of
wind, solar and other renewable energies that would be ready to take over
completely somewhere around 2025.
Given the choice between coals and nuclear, Mr. Carter
chose coal. He canceled experimental reactors, shut down research, ended the
reprocessing of spent fuel (a decision that created the unnecessary problem of
nuclear waste), and effectively brought the technology to a halt. At the time,
the nation was burning half-a-billion tons of coal a year. Mr. Carter vowed we
would reach one billion tons by 2000 and that promise was fulfilled. Even as
coal use declines today, we still consume just under one billion tons a year.
As a result, America has lost its lead in nuclear
technology. There are now 60 reactors under construction around the
world—including 26 in China—but only four new ones being built in the U.S.
Russia, France and South Korea are even further ahead in the technology, selling
their reactors all over the world. India and Argentina each just brought a new
reactor on line in May.
On Friday, Russia fired up a fast breeder reactor, the
holy grail that consumes all forms of nuclear waste. We abandoned the
technology in the 1990s.
To illustrate further how far things have declined in
this country: Fourteen years ago Bill Gates assigned Microsoft's MSFT -1.30% technology genius
Nathan Myhrvold to explore the frontiers for advanced energy. Mr. Myhrvold
settled on a design using the traveling wave, a reactor that burns for 50 years
without refueling and consumes its own waste. After waiting a year at the gates
of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Rockville, Md., Messrs. Gates and
Myhrvold realized there was no hope of experimenting in the U.S. So they took
their reactor design to China. In 2011 Mr. Gates signed an agreement with the
Chinese National Nuclear Corporation to develop the traveling wave.
The same thing is happening with thorium, which
produces no plutonium and is therefore proliferation-proof. Most nuclear
engineers believe thorium to be a far superior fuel to uranium. China and India
are developing thorium technology, but not the U.S.
It is ridiculous to think we can go into the
Industrial Belt of the Midwest and tell people they must close down coal plants
without anything to replace them. Natural gas is offered as an alternative, but
with gas leading a manufacturing revival, pressure building to export it, and
attempts under way to substitute gas for gasoline in our cars, who knows how
long the price will remain low?
We should be building nuclear reactors right beside
every old coal plant. Had we pursued this path 40 years ago, we would not only
have lowered U.S. carbon emissions, as have France and Sweden, but we could be
helping other countries reduce theirs as well. We can still, if we go back to
that road not taken and revive nuclear energy.
Mr. Tucker is the
author of "Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Power Will Lead the Green
Revolution and End America's Energy Odyssey" (Bartleby Press, 2010).
WATCH: Impeachment Is Nothing Compared To What Ted
Cruz Wants To Do To Eric Holder
"If this was a Republican
administration..."
Texas Senator Ted Cruz sounds
off on Attorney General Eric Holder for his appointing of of a major democratic
donor, Barbara Bosserman, to investigate the IRS scandal. Cruz then called for
Holder’s impeachment if he refused to appoint an independent prosecutor.
Cruz cited the decisions of
the Attorneys General under Presidents Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton to
appoint independent prosecutors when they both were accused of abusing their
power.
“If this were a Republican
administration, every media outlet would have banner headlines every single
day.”
“If the allegation is of
abusive government power at the IRS, to target citizens for their political
beliefs, then you cannot entrust the investigation to a partisan whose
political interest is protecting the party in power,” said Cruz.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-goes-holder-wont-appoint-special-prosecutor-impeached/#Krki8BMHszK3RtOI.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/ted-cruz-goes-holder-wont-appoint-special-prosecutor-impeached/#Krki8BMHszK3RtOI.99
Israel Finds Missing Teens Dead,
Considers Strikes Against Hamas
Should they strike?
The recent discovery of the
bodies of three missing teens in Israel has triggered outrage against Hamas, the Palestinian
terrorist group. Hamas is believed to be responsible by Israeli authorities for
kidnapping and then murdering the teens.
Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanhayu expressed anger against Hamas for the slayings:
They were kidnapped and murdered in cold blood by beasts.
He added:
Hamas is responsible and Hamas will pay.
Netanyahu also expressed deep
remorse for the three murdered Israeli students:
On behalf of the people of Israel, I wish to tell their dear families …
our hearts are bleeding, the entire nation is weeping with you.
The Israeli ambulance was stoned by Palestinian Arabs after it picked up the corpses of
the three teens.
Now Netanyahu’s security
cabinet has convened after nightfall to discuss the situation. They are
weighing the options of going after Hamas, the group believed to be responsible
by Israel.
If the goal is to create large-scale damage to the infrastructure in
Gaza, it can be done from the air.
He also said:
But if the goal is to change the strategic environment, you need boots
on the ground.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/israel-finds-missing-teens-dead-considers-strikes-against-hamas/#SWY8q8wjYTBXlg6m.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/israel-finds-missing-teens-dead-considers-strikes-against-hamas/#SWY8q8wjYTBXlg6m.99
OBAMA’S ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION INVITATION. John Hayward
You
can tell the tidal wave of illegal aliens, many of them unaccompanied minors,
surging across the southern border is causing a bit of political discomfort for
President Obama, because he briefly felt obliged to pretend he’s not happy
about it. ”Briefly” means last Friday, when the President gave us the
hilarious vaudeville pantomime act of asking the people of Central America to
stop throwing their kids across the hemisphere. From a Washington
Times report:
President
Obama made a personal plea Friday for the families of Central America not to
send their children to America, trying to stanch the crisis of illegal
immigrant youths flooding across the border.
“Our message is absolutely don’t send
your children unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers,” Mr.
Obama said on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”
He
made the plea in response to a bipartisan group of senators who Thursday
demanded that he “personally make clear” that minors jumping the border won’t
get special treatment.
The
president, who continues to struggle with how to deal with the thousands of
unaccompanied alien children flooding across the southern border, stressed that
the journey to America isn’t safe for children traveling alone and that the
U.S. will send them home after they arrive.
“Our
message is absolutely don’t send your children unaccompanied on trains or
through a bunch of smugglers,” he said. “That is our direct message to the
families of Central America: Do not send your children to the borders. If they
do make it, they’ll get sent back. More importantly, they might not make it.”
“They’ll
get sent back?” How stupid does
this man think we are? Tell you what, Mr. President: how about you
personally travel aboard the first mass repatriation flight to Honduras, and
give your “they’ll be sent back” warning in a speech from there, surrounded by
the thousand minors you just hauled back from the refugee camps you want
American taxpayers to spend $2 billion on. Then people might start paying attention to your
rhetorical “messages.”
In
truth, false messages are being sent to American voters, while the incoming
wave of refugees are getting the real message
loud and clear. The same Washington Times article
includes a quote from an unnamed Administration official who admitted “more than
50 percent of children who illegally cross the border alone will be allowed to
remain in the United States.” A 50-50 shot at getting your kid residency
plus benefits in the United States looks pretty good to people trapped in the
violent squalor of Central America, stuck between corrupt governments and
trigger-happy drug gangs. And really, that’s a ridiculous under-estimation of the odds
of success. The real “repatriation” rate for families traveling with
children won’t crack 10 percent, and it’ll be even less for unaccompanied
minors.
Obama
was back to his Cloward-Piven strategy of deliberately overloading the U.S.
immigration system on Monday, promising to use more executive orders like the
one that launched this invasion, his Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
program, because Congress won’t give him what he wants. The Democrats’
enthusiasm for “enlightened” despotism, and their hunger to keep that flood of
illegals coming in, reached insulting lows when Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) said that
if House Speaker John Boehner doesn’t get a “comprehensive immigration reform
bill” cooking soon, “the president will ‘borrow’ the power that is needed to
solve the problems of immigration.”
That’s
the new euphemism for dictatorship: “borrowing” powers forbidden by the
Constitution, because Congress won’t do what the dictator wants. Perhaps
smarting from the long string of Supreme Court decisions that have made a
mockery of his claims to be an expert in constitutional law, the President
didn’t endorse this novel theory of power-borrowing in so many words on Monday,
instead opting to pretend that he’s deeply sorrowful that he must trample on
the separation of powers to get what he wants, because the American system
refuses to obey him. From a Fox
News report:
President
Obama vowed Monday to bypass Congress and pursue unilateral changes to the
country’s immigration system, defying House Republicans who say his executive
actions are part of the problem.
The
president, speaking in the Rose Garden, said he is forced to go it alone
because the House has failed to act on a comprehensive overhaul. He said
Speaker John Boehner informed him last week the House will not vote on an
immigration bill this year.
“America
cannot wait forever for them to act,” Obama said. He said he’s launching a new
effort to “fix as much of our immigration system as I can, on my own, without
Congress.”
I expect thunderous applause from every
Democrat in the land when the next Republican president invokes precisely the
same reasoning to bypass Congress and fix our tax system, which is far more
broken and confusing than our immigration laws.
The
president’s announcement is sure to infuriate congressional Republicans. Obama
is pushing for new executive actions in defiance of Boehner’s vow last week to
pursue a lawsuit against the president over alleged executive overreach. Even
before Monday’s announcement, Boehner and his colleagues alleged that the
president has gone too far in making changes without Congress to immigration
policy, the Affordable Care Act, environmental regulations and other issues.
This
new push would go further still.
In
a written statement, Boehner called Obama’s announcement “sad and
disappointing,” and said executive orders “can’t and won’t fix these problems.”
“Sad”
and “disappointing” are not the correct words for this, Speaker Boehner.
What Obama is doing with this illegal-alien tsunami, and his talk of
shredding the Constitution to get what he wants, is outrageous. And it’s not “sad” in the sense
that we should feel a swell of pity for the President – he’s aggressively
abusing his power, and bringing in foreign power,
to rewrite the American system in a way voters did not endorse, and very few
support. This might be thought of as “sad” if it wasn’t working. But it is.
Which brings us to the classic
Cloward-Piven part of President Obama’s remarks – as pure a distillation of
their manufactured-crisis theory as you’ll ever hear:
During his remarks in the Rose Garden,
Obama cited the current surge of illegal immigrant
children crossing the southern border and said the “crisis” should underscore
the need to pass a comprehensive bill. But Boehner claimed that it was
Obama’s past executive orders — those easing deportations for some illegal
immigrants — that “have led directly to the humanitarian crisis along the
southern border.”
Boehner
said “additional executive action from this president isn’t going to stem the
tide of illegal crossings, it’s only going to make them worse.” He also
referred to last week’s Supreme Court ruling that Obama overstepped in making
recess appointments, saying the court “reminded us” that there are “sharp
limits” to presidential power.
As
for his conversation last week with the president, Boehner said he only told
Obama what he’s been saying for months: that until the public and elected
officials trust him to enforce the law, “it is going to be difficult to make
progress on this issue.”
Yes, he just “cited” the crisis he
deliberately created as a justification for getting even more of what he wants.
Cloward-Piven all the way down, baby! And while Speaker Boehner is
correct to point out that more executive orders to weaken our immigration
system will only make the crisis worse, it’s a bit silly to pretend that Obama
himself doesn’t know that.
House
Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi – reliably dense enough to forget that the victims
aren’t supposed to know they’re
being mauled by a Cloward-Piven attack – chipped in by looking at the thousands
of alien kids tucked into makeshift refugee shelters, beaming warmly at the
humanitarian nightmare her Party has created, and pronouncing
it a wonderful “opportunity.”
“This crisis that some call a crisis, we
have to view as an opportunity,” Pelosi squealed in delight. ”If you
believe as we do that every child, every person has a spark of divinity in
them, and is therefore worthy of respect – what we saw in those rooms was a
dazzling, sparkling array of God’s children, worthy of respect.”
That’s
grimly amusing coming from an abortion extremist who is all about snuffing out
“divine sparks of life” in some children.
How about all the children who are dying on their thousand-mile trek to
accept your amnesty offer, Mrs. Pelosi? Texas police say they come across
such bodies “quite often.” The most
recent gruesome discovery was an 11-year-old Guatemalan boy who got
lost on his way to Nancy Pelosi’s opportunity drive, and died a mile from the
Texas border with a rosary around his neck…. and the phone number of his
brother in Chicago written on the inside of his belt buckle.
As
for the Supreme Court smackdowns, it’s debatable just how “sharp” those limits
on executive power are, especially since Obama and the Democrats show
absolutely no sign of being chastened by their defeats, nor is their friendly
media interested in shaming them. Attacks on the American constitutional
order that get partially repelled years later by Supreme Court decisions cannot
be judged entirely ineffective. In this case, if Obama scribbles some
more amnesty orders and the 150,000 unaccompanied alien minors anticipated this
year turns into 200,000 or 250,000, does anyone really think a 2016 thrashing
at the Supreme Court would result in all those kids getting sent home?
What Obama is doing on the border cannot be reversed by any court, and if
they step in to slow him down in a couple of years, it will already be too late
to make a difference.
Obama’s “plea” to the governments and
people of Central America on Friday was really just a bit of theater to
reinforce the Administration’s favorite new talking point, which is that the
new wave of illegal aliens are wrong or foolish to come here – they were
supposedly deluded by “misinformation” from smugglers, local media, and
government officials. That’s supposed to get Obama off the hook for provoking
the crisis. It’s not his fault that hundreds of thousands of people
failed to read the fine print in his executive orders!
But
it bears repeating that the truth is painfully obvious, and
entirely contrary to this silly talking point. The message being sent to
illegals did not come from Obama looking into a camera, holding up a map of the
Rio Grande, and inviting them all to visit Texas. The message is sent by
what our political class says about illegal immigration, and the reality of
what happens to those who make it across the border. Interviews with the
new arrivals underline that many of them have friends of relatives already
living in the United States, who are giving them not “misinformation,” but a
quite accurate picture of where the immigration reform debate has been heading.
Those
contemplating a run for the border can hear Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) sayingthat while Republicans decide whether or not to provide the
alien-friendly immigration “reforms” he wants, “I believe the President of the
United States has already in statute, in the law, the ability to heal and put
in a safe harbor millions of undocumented immigrants while the Congress of the
United States finally decides it’s going to take action.” He added that
he expects Republicans to keep saying “no, no, no” on an immigration deal… but
he also expects Obama to be “broad, expansive, and generous in the use of his
prosecutorial discretion.” Message to aliens: no deportations.
The
only hitch in this strategy thus far has been the unanticipated volume of the
new arrivals. They weren’t supposed to come quite this rapidly; it
spooked the American electorate, especially once photos of the grim reality in
Nancy Pelosi’s Hubs of Opportunity started leaking out. President Obama
felt obliged to announce on Friday that he’s moving additional resources to the
border – something that he would have done a long time ago, if he was sincerely concerned
about the crisis itself, rather than its political fallout. This story
has been percolating through conservative media for months, and the mainstream
press picked it up weeks ago. The President would have known about the
gathering crisis before those refugee camps started filling up – we have
intelligence services that would detect massive migrant waves moving across the
hemisphere. But only now does
Obama decide to beef up the Border Patrol?
Polls show
Americans not only responding negatively to the humanitarian crisis on the
border, but also a growing desire to restrict legal immigration further, although they still
seem supportive of visa programs for skilled workers. Some of the
reluctance for high levels of legal immigration is probably a response to the
endless economic doldrums of the Obama years, the sense that the American
economy isn’t creating enough jobs to sustain the people who are already here.
In fact, a remarkable
report from the Center for Immigration Studies, released last week, found that
virtually all net jobs created from
2000 to 2014 went to immigrants – in other words, job creation is barely
keeping pace with immigration, while the native-born workforce shrinks.
Hitting
the brakes on immigration in the face of such concerns is a reasonable
response, not xenophobia. But of course, it will be denounced as
xenophobia by the dominant political and media culture of the United States…
and that message will be heard beyond our borders far more clearly than a
presidential press conference or two. The message that what the American
people want from immigration reform matters very little to the Ruling Class has
been sent loud and clear, too.
AMENPER: CORTE SUPREMA DE JUSTICIA DE
LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
No. 13-354. Sostuvo 25 de marzo
2014-Decidió 30 de junio 2014 *
La Ley de Restauración de Libertad Religiosa de 1993 (RFRA) prohíbe "el
Gobierno [de] sustancialmente imponer un cargo por el derecho [ing] del
ejercicio de la religión de una persona, incluso si el cargo resulta de regla
de aplicabilidad general, ¬" a menos que el Gobierno "demuestra
que la aplicación de laa obligación a la persona-(1) es para
promover un convincente ¬ interés mental; y (2) es el medio menos
restrictivo de interés público imperativo más allá de 2 USC § § 2000bb-1 (a),
(b).
En su versión modificada por la Ley
de Uso del derecho Religioso y ´personas institucionalizadas de 2000
(RLUIPA), RFRA cubre "cualquier ejercicio de la religión, sea o no
obligado por, o central, un sistema de creencia religiosa sea ¬." §
2000cc-5 (7) (A).
Esta acertada decisión de la corte
suprema si la sacamos de la verborrea legal, se trata simplemente de la
aplicación de la libertad de culto que implementaron los fundadores de la
nación. Una nación creada en sus principios por perseguidos religiosos.
No se trata realmente de lo que
oímos, no se trata de nada que tenga que ver con la salud ni el derecho de la
mujer. Cualquier mujer puede comprar un anticonceptivo a un precio
barato o lo puede obtener sin costo en las clínicas de “planificación familiar”-
O sea que las reclamaciones de “guerra contra las mujeres” y las reclamaciones
de ataques a la salud de la población es pura política liberal.
Por la otra parte, no es cierta
religión lo que se está defendiendo, la mayoría de los católicos han
usado anticonceptivos. Es simplemente el derecho de una
persona de negarse a que le impongan una carga que va contra el ejercicio de
las doctrinas de institución religiosa a que pertenecen. Esto es lo que aclara
la decisión. Las dos partes están presentando hechos que no son muy exactos,
pero lo que sí es exacto es que la libertad de culto, o sea la libertad de
pensar y practicar una religión al no ser que sea contra el interés
público. O sea que si no afecta el derecho de otros, el derecho
personal de practicar una religión está protegido por la constitución.
Si esta administración por intereses
políticos, trata la constitución como papel higiénico, la Corte Suprema
solamente le está recordando que aunque bajo ataque, todavía en este país la
separación de poderes está vigente y que es el derecho de la corte
interpretarla y asegurar que se cumpla.
Georgia 'Guns Everywhere' Law In Effect Today
Due to a
new measure effective today, Georgia residents may take guns into some bars,
nightclubs and schools as long as they have a license to carry.
The law
allows religious leaders to “opt in” to permit guns on their worship premises
and also makes it legal for permit-holders to take firearms near Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints.
Critics
call the measure the “guns everywhere” bill. They believe it disturbs places of
worship, bars and schools, though Georgians may not bring their firearm into a
bar or church if the property owner bans them. GeorgiaCarry lobbied for the
bill, calling it “meaningful pro-gun legislation.”
Georgia
Governor Nathan Deal signed the bill into law in April. The measure was
approved by the Republican-controlled Georgia General Assembly.
Samitier: Dime Con Quien Andas Y Te
Diré Quién Eres... Resuelto! Los Homosexuales Declaran A El Papa Bergolio oficialmente
"COOL"...
El notorio homosexual Elton John,
declara que el Papa Francisco,
es "maravilloso".
Dijo: “Nosotros, Los Hateros Sexuales, Somos Todos
Homofóbicos, Retrógrados, Intolerantes, Etc.
Porque Queremos Un Mundo Sano!
Ahora Los ENFERMOS Somos Los NORMALES… Qué No DAMOS LAS
NALGAS…
Pop icon Elton John
calls Pope Francis "wonderful"
El
Gobierno, Repleto De Homosexuales Y Comunistas Infiltrados,
Como
Maestros y Técnicos En Toda Clase De Actividades…
Usa
Un Muñequito Lésbico Para Adoctrinar A Los Menores Usando
El
Dinero Del Pueblo.
Justice Dept Uses Lesbian Cartoon
Characters
To Teach Kids
About Cell Phone Safety
The Department of Justice
has spent $1.2 million on a website which depicts cartoon cellphones
engaging in real-life
dating scenarios, in an effort to help teens define their “digital line” as it
pertains to relationship abuse.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/justice-dept-uses-lesbian-cartoon-characters-to-teach-kids-about-cell-phone-safety/#ixzz36Htoac9D
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/justice-dept-uses-lesbian-cartoon-characters-to-teach-kids-about-cell-phone-safety/#ixzz36Htoac9D
¿Qué Es “Abuso De Un Menor” ??? Usted decide...
Los Médicos Dictaminaron Que Nacer En La Casa Es Un
Crimen…
Toda Mis Padres y Hermanos Nacieron En La Casa…
Cualquiera que se enfrenta al sistema medico
oficial, es una amenaza a la sociedad.
El Gobierno decide
lo que es bueno para el Pueblo!
Cuando los
homosexuales sidosos iban por las discotecas infectando a otros,
eso era su
derecho. Pero cuando una madre desea dar a luz en su
casa,
eso es abuso infantil, de acuerdo al
mismo gobierno.
También UNA NALGADA… Es ABUSO Infantil…
Pero Una ENTRADA DE
PALOS POR LA POLICIA
ES UNA NECESIDAD SOCIAL…
Algo no cuadra???
See more at: http://healthydebates.com/police-confiscate-healthy-baby-born-home/#sthash.3nH0wlC5.dpuf
Watch: What Sheriff Joe Just Suggested To Do To Secure
The Border Will Make Liberals Go Crazy
“I would go back to what I did in Mexico..."
In a recent radio interview, the Arizona lawman often described as
‘America’s toughest sheriff’ weighed in once again on the immigration crisis
that has disproportionately affected his state and others that share a border
with Mexico.
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio
concluded that he has “a lot of authority as sheriff,” though he has a few
ideas about how to secure the border and stem the flow of illegal immigrants
that could only be implemented by the federal authorities.
“I would go back to what I did in Mexico,”
he said, recalling his years as a special agent with the Drug Enforcement
Agency.
He explained that U.S. agents “worked
right along with Mexico authorities locking up dope peddlers,” noting the same
approach could be used to fight illegal immigration.
“I’d send my Border Patrol across the
border,” he said, and encourage them to “work with the Federales and the
military.”
While Arpaio conceded that such an
approach is unlikely from this or any modern administration, he concluded
“that’s what we used to do and we really dried up the drug traffic.”
He noted that the U.S. military could be
involved in the interest of safety, noting that the only roadblock would be
convincing the Mexican president that such a bilateral approach would be
beneficial to all involved.
Arpaio asserted that he would simply “go
in there, have a few drinks with him, and get the job done.”
Instead, the sheriff lamented that the
federal government is spending its time accusing him and his department of
racial discrimination based on the effort to uphold federal law.
“I had 160 of my people trained for six
weeks and given the authority to enforce federal illegal immigration laws,” he
said. “They took that away from me. I guess we’re doing too good a job.”
He concluded that the border will continue
to pose problems as long as those in power refuse to act. The recidivism rate
among illegals, he noted, is extraordinarily high, leading him to believe that
criminals are being “dumped on the streets of Arizona” upon their release
instead of being deported to their home country.
The current influx of illegals, he
suggested, was likely “a ploy to generate controversy” in the hopes that
“Congress would finally look at the situation or the president would start
issuing executive orders.”
Public backlash against the steady stream
of border-crossers, however, has caused that plan to backfire, he said.
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-thinks-novel-approach-border-security-work/#iHgigGFje5w0ZEKv.99
Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-thinks-novel-approach-border-security-work/#iHgigGFje5w0ZEKv.99
AMENPER: A comer yerba
Cuando los
ambientalistas preocupados por el "cambio climático" se convierten en
comisarios de la policía federal de nutrición, es una receta para el desastre.
Leyendo de
la actualización para el 2015 de las Guías Alimentarias para los
estadounidenses, que se revisan cada cinco años. Los departamentos federales de
Agricultura y Salud y Servicios Humanos se basan en las recomendaciones del
Comité Asesor de las Guías Dietéticas ambientalista para modificar las normas
de nutrición de la nación.
Y ahí es
donde las ruedas se le caen al carretón.
El comité
incluye a nutricionistas "radicales" que quieren salvar el planeta
para los estadounidenses cambiando a una "dieta basada en
plantas"----, oyeron, no más lechón asado al pincho este cuatro de Julio,
no más arroz con frijoles negros. Nos dicen. "En general, queremos estar
seguros de hacer recomendaciones para una dieta saludable, ecológicamente
responsable", dice la presidenta del comité Bárbara Millen.
Así que es
lo que nos están diciendo, ¿Que los, consejos de nutrición no se basan
consideraciones dietéticas, sino en lo que se considera ser "ecológicamente"
saludable para el planeta?
Incluso si
la mayoría de los estadounidenses ignoramos estas tonterías, las directrices
afectan en última instancia, los programas federales de nutrición, como las
comidas escolares.
Nuestros
hijos y nietos considerarán que somos salvajes comiendo y nos pedirán yerba
verde en nochebuena.
El
Congreso no debe permitir que los extremistas cometan atropellos contra lo que
los estadounidenses consumen.
Si una
cruzada ambiental se apodera de lo que se supone que son las pautas de nutrición,
a continuación, los legisladores deben retener los fondos para las directrices.
No debemos
permitir que con el dinero de nosotros los contribuyentes nuestros hijos tengan
una dieta obligatoria determinada no por dietistas pero por burócratas de la
religión ambientalista.
Y que los
déspotas dietéticos mastiquen eso y se traguen sus yerbas y nos dejen con las
comidas que nos ha permitido vivir por todos estos años.
Claro que como van las cosas
¿Qué importa el congreso? Tenemos al presidente con su pluma alegre
firmando decisiones ejecutivas. Aunque nosotros los cubanos quizás podamos
convencer al presidente que los frijoles como son negros, es mejor que la yerba
verde.
|
|
MIRIAM DOPICO: WANT TO STOP RACISM IN
AMERICA? THIS VIDEO IS ONLY 2 MINUTES LONG...PLEASE WATCH IT AND THEN FORWARD
FAR & WIDE.
Want To Stop Racism
In America ? - Arrest Barack Obama
WND MEDIA
NEWSPAPER VERY SORRY FOR ENDORSING OBAMA
Prez 'has earned every bit of an abysmal approval rating'
The Billings, Montana, Gazette, the biggest newspaper
in the state, and, in fact, the biggest in a region that includes portions of
neighbors North Dakota, Wyoming and Idaho, is admitting, slightly after the
fact, that it was wrong to endorse Barack Obama for president in 2008.
“Sometimes,
you have to admit you’re wrong,” the newspaper said in an
unbylined editorial on June 27. “And, we were wrong.”
It listed a series of scandals and controversies
generated by the Obama administration, and the lack of progress on real issues.
“These are
all signs – none of them definitive on their own, necessarily. However, when
taken in completely, these demonstrate a disturbing trend of incompetence and
failure. It’s not just that Americans are in a sour mood about national politics.
That’s probably part of it. Instead, Obama has become another in a line of
presidents long on rhetoric and hopelessly short on action,” the paper said.
“Obama’s hope and change have left liberals and
conservatives alike hoping for real change, not just more lofty rhetoric.”
The Washington Examiner noted the change of heart with a
headline, “That bad, huh? Newspaper so disappointed in Obama it apologizes for
2008 endorsement.”
The Examiner continued, “Better late than never.”
The Gazette explained that for the 2008 election, it
believed that “things couldn’t get much worse after the sub par presidency of
George W. Bush.”
“But,” the paper wrote, “President Barack Obama’s
administration has us yearning for the good ol’ days when we were at least
winning battles in Iraq.”
It listed the number of “bungled or blown policies” by
Obama, “which lead us to believe Obama has earned every bit of an abysmal
approval rating.”
Those issues, all of which have been covered
extensively on the pages of WND over the last six years, include the National
Security Agency program to spy on Americas, the crackdown by Obama on
coal-fired power plants, Iraq, the Bowe Bergdahl exchange in which Obama
released five known and feared terrorist leaders, the Veterans Administration
scandal, stem cell technology, Obama’s crackdown on journalists and, “finally,
Obamacare has become synonymous with boondoggle.”
The criticisms were pointed on these issues.
“”The administration as done nearly nothing to
safeguard civil liberties or put in safeguards to protect our constitutionally
guaranteed freedoms,” the paper wrote about the NSA spying scandal.
On Bergdahl, the paper said, “What should have been an
easy public relations victory for bringing a lost soldier home turned into a
public relations nightmare, and continued to erode public confidence, leading
some to wonder if Obama’s team can’t even get something as important as
bringing home a captive soldier correct, what can it be successful at?”
The VA debacle “was another black eye for the
administration which appeared to look incompetent when it comes to taking care
of wounded, or in-need veterans.”
On Obamacare, it said, “One thing is certain: The
public presentation and roll-out of the program was so riddled with technical
glitches and problems, it greatly undermined the public’s confidence in the
system.”
The Western Journalism
Center pointed out
that the newspaper did not endorse Obama again in 2012, after calling for his
election in 2008.
At that time, the paper said, “At this extremely
challenging time, America needs a uniter, not a divider. In this economic
turmoil, America needs a thoughtful, cool-headed optimist who envisions a
bright future for all citizens. … Our great nation needs a new leader who can
inspire confidence at home and aboard. Obama is that leader.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/07/newspaper-apologizes-for-endorsing-obama-in-08/#PhjhMWe4Su5vqjBe.99
|
Send Congress the pink slip
Shock campaign that fired up 2010 revolution is back. |
||
|
WASHINGTON – What happens when more than 9 million messages warning Congress to shape up or ship out? The only time it ever happened was 2009. That's when WND launched the "Send Congress a Pink Slip" campaign resulting in an avalanche of imminent firing notices that were carefully and successfully delivered to every member of Congress over a period of several months. The warnings were delivered on pink paper – depleting all supplies of pink paper in North America. Piled on top of one another, they would tower above the tallest building in the Capitol, the Washington Monument – eventually even the tallest building in the world. Some members extolled the campaign against overspending and irresponsible behavior, while others whispered and murmured about it behind closed doors. Ultimately the pink slip campaign presaged the tea party movement and one of the biggest voter revolts in American history in 2010. And that's why WND is bringing it back – updated, rejuvenated and refined – in 2014. Here's the message to every single member of the House and Senate you can send by participating in the campaign before November: THIS IS YOUR FINAL NOTICE! It's time to do the job you were elected to do:
· Hold the president accountable for repeated violations of the
Constitution.
· Punish all those culpable for using the IRS to target citizens based
on their political beliefs and activities.
· Break up the Veterans Administration cartel and get medical care to
our vets now.
· Demand Barack Obama enforce immigration laws now or else.
If you fail to live up to these urgent demands, your REAL PINK SLIP WILL BE ISSUED ON ELECTION DAY. Signed, Your employer, Each pink slip bears your actual name and address as provided in your order. And they all ask for a response from each member. During the last campaign, bundles of pink slips were dispatched... It's a not-so-subtle way of reminding members of Congress - Democrats and Republicans - who they work for, who pays their salaries and who sent them to Washington. It's an effective way to let them know they might be back on the job market in November if they don't read the political tea leaves and understand the frustration and anger being felt on Main Street. "It's time to shake these people up, again," said Joseph Farah, WND founder and chief executive office. "Republicans need to hear it as much as Democrats. After all, they're not holding Barack Obama accountable. He should have been impeached by the House, which is controlled by the so-called opposition party. Participating in this campaign is like taking part in one gigantic collective primal scream heard from coast to coast." ...and cartloads... If you want Congress to exercise its power to hold the White House accountable for abuse of the Constitution, for targeting political "enemies" with Internal Revenue Service harassment, making wounded warriors and other veterans wait months for medical services and for refusing to enforce immigration laws, here's your opportunity to make your voice heard along with millions of others who share your anger and frustration. The secret of its success is the delivery method. All pink slips are sent using FedEx, ensuring actual delivery to congressional offices. The messages are bundled for delivery by recipient to keep the costs down and to increase the impact. "How else could you send every member of Congress a message in one minute for a total cost of $29.95?" asks Farah. "It can't be done. We found the sweet spot for getting their attention in a dramatic way. It's never been replicated – until now." ...and truckloads. If you’d like to bury Congress in pink slips again, now's your chance. For just $29.95 you can send an individualized notice to every member of Congress in the form of a "pink slip." It will bear your name and your address and be sent and delivered to every member of the House and Senate, giving them plenty to think about before the November election. Are you ready for another revolution in 2014? Only you can make it happen. If your memory fails you, or if you never heard of the 2009 pink slip campaign, here are some points to highlight: Pretty in pink slips – 7 million and counting! Pink slips could paper path from NY to Washington Historic! 850,000 'pink slips' to Congress – in 3 days Pink-slipping Congress wipes out paper supplies Congressional news conference hails 5 million pink slips Boxes, pallets, truckloads of pink slips going to Congress Participate in the campaign |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
|
||
|
IMAGINENSE POR 2 MINUTOS QUE ES LO QUE SE DEMORARAN EN
LEER ESTO: IMAGINENSE QUE LOS EXTRATERRESTRES SECUESTRARON A OBAMA Y SE LO
LLEVARON PARA SU PLANETA “TOM-KOLL” DE VISITA A 500 MILLONES DE ANOS LUZ DE USA
Y QUE SU NAVE SE LES ROMPIO Y NO TIENEN MAS NAVES NI LA PUEDEN ARREGLAR, O QUE
UN TRIBU DE CANIVALES DE AFRICA PRIMOS DE EL SE LO COMIERON EN UN AJIACO, O QUE
LE CALLO EN LA CABEZA EL AVION PRESIDENCIAL
EN UNA ISLA REMOTA DE HAWAII, O QUE LOS REPUBLICANOS SE LO COMIERON EN
UN AJIACO EN EL CONGRESO, O SE LO LLEVO EL “CHUPACABRAS O EL “CHICHIRICU” O EL “COCO, O QUE EL MAGO DEL RINGLIN LO
DESAPARECIO DE AVIAJE, O QUE NUNCA EXISTIO OBAMA, O QUE SE METIO EN LA BOLSA DE
UN CANGURO UYENDOLE A MICHEL, O QUE SE LO COMIO EL TIBURON SANGRIENTO…
AHHHHHH!!! QUE
RICO TATA…
“En mi opinión” Lázaro R González Miño
“FREEDOM IS NOT FREE”
No comments:
Post a Comment